| Plan Review Stops For Permit 20030974 |
| Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-12-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cpuell |
Date |
2020-12-29 |
Time |
09:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cpuell |
Date |
2020-12-29 |
Time |
09:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-12-29 09:47:59 | GIVEN ADDRESS IF 189@OKEECHOBEE BLVD TO REFLECT THE | | | START OF THE PROJECT |
|
|
| Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2020-07-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cpuell |
Date |
2020-07-31 |
Time |
15:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cpuell |
Date |
2020-07-31 |
Time |
15:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-07-31 15:55:03 | PLEASE CONTACT [email protected], TO BE ASSIGNED A GENERIC | | | PROPERTY CONTROL NUMBER FOR VERIZON, ALSO PLEASE EMAIL | | | A SITE PLAN SHOWING THE EXACT LOCATION OF THE POLE IS | | | TO BE INSTALLED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2021-06-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-06-24 |
Time |
13:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-06-24 |
Time |
13:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-06-24 13:22:34 | 05/28/21 DISCUSSED WITH ROBERT BROWN. | | | POLE IS LOCATED WITHIN FDOT ROW. POLE DESIGN AND | | | SPECIFICATIONS REVIEWED/APPROVED UNDER FDOT PERMIT | | | #2019-H-496-00552. | | | PERMIT PACKAGE IS INCLUDED IN THIS SUBMITTAL. JG. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-06-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-06-07 |
Time |
14:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-06-07 |
Time |
13:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-06-07 14:01:13 | NOTE: | | | CHRISTINA WARR SEND ME EMAIL ON 06/03/21 LISTING | | | SEVERAL PROJECTS, INCLUDING THIS ONE 20030974. THERE IS | | | NOTHING NEW UPLOADED TO PROJECTDOX. CONTRACTOR NEEDS TO | | | UPLOAD TO PROJECTDOX THE INFORMATION TO ADDRESS THE | | | COMMENTS BY ALL THE PLAN REVIEWERS. | | | NOTE: | | | PROVIDE FDOT APPROVED PERMIT PACKAGE. IF THERE IS NOT | | | FDOT APPROVED PERMIT PACKAGE THEN ALL THE BUILDING | | | REVIEW COMMENTS APPLY. SEE COMMENTS BELOW. | | | | | | | | | SECOND BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS | | | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | 1- APPLICATION WAS SUBMITTED AS AN ELECTRICAL PERMIT | | | ONLY FOR THE INSTALLATION OF 100 AMP ELECTRICAL SERVICE | | | TO SMALL CELL POLE. BASED ON THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED, | | | IT LOOKS LIKE A COMMUNICATIONS PERMIT IS REQUIRED. CITY | | | ORDINANCE NO. 4774-18. | | | NOTE: PLEASE SEE ZONING AND ENGINEERING COMMENTS. | | | | | | RESPONSE. | | | PLEASE SEE ZONING AND ENGINEERING COMMENTS. | | | | | | 2- TITLE SHEET T1 SPECIFIES "INSTALLATION OF PROPOSED | | | POWER FOR SMALL CELL EQUIPMENT ON PROPOSED METAL POLE". | | | SCOPE OF WORK IS NOT CLEAR. IS THERE A NEW METAL POLE | | | OR IS IT EXISTING INSTALLED BY FPL.?. PLANS ALSO SHOW | | | VERIZON WIRELESS ENCLOSURE ATTACHED TO THE POLE. THERE | | | ARE NO SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE ATTACHMENT OF THIS | | | ENCLOSURE TO THE POLE. IS THIS DONE UNDER ANOTHER | | | PERMIT?. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | PROVIDE PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR | | | THE PROPOSED METAL POLE AND VERIZON WIRELESS ENCLOSURE | | | ATTACHMENT IF THEY ARE PART OF THIS PERMIT. SEC. 1609.1 | | | FBC-BUILDING. | | | | | | RESPONSE: | | | A) IT IS NOT CLEAR IF A NEW POLE WILL BE INSTALLED OR | | | NOT. IF NEW POLE IS INSTALLED, THEN PROVIDE COMPLETE | | | ENGINEERING DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS, INCLUDING THE | | | EFFECTIVE PROJECTIVE AREA OF THE POLE AND PROPOSED | | | EQUIPMENT TO BE INSTALLED IN IT. | | | PLANS ALSO SHOW VERIZON WIRELESS ENCLOSURES ATTACHED TO | | | THE POLE. THERE ARE NO SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE | | | ATTACHMENT OF THIS ENCLOSURES TO THE POLE. SEC. 1609.1 | | | FBC-BUILDING. ALSO, PROVIDE ALL THE WIND DESIGN DATA AS | | | REQUIRED BY SEC. 1603.4 FBC-BUILDING. | | | | | | B)PROVIDE POLE MANUFACTURER'S SPECS MEETING THE | | | ENGINEER'S DESIGN CRITERIA. ENGINEER OF RECORD TO | | | REVIEW/APPROVED POLE SPECS PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL. SEC. | | | 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | | | | 3- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS LOW. | | | VALUATION TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, CONTRACTOR'S | | | OVERHEAD AND PROFIT AND DESIGN PROFESSIONAL FEES AS | | | REQUIRED BY SEC. 109.3 CITY AMENDMENTS. UPDATE | | | VALUATION AS REQUIRED, INCLUDING DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | | | FEES. | | | | | | RESPONSE | | | NOT ADDRESSED. SCOPE OF WORK IS NOT CLEAR. UNABLE TO | | | DETERMINE VALUE. | | | | | | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY | | | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | BUILDING DIVISION | | | (561)805-6712 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-03-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-03-09 |
Time |
13:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-03-09 |
Time |
12:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-03-09 13:13:26 | SECOND BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS | | | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | 1- APPLICATION WAS SUBMITTED AS AN ELECTRICAL PERMIT | | | ONLY FOR THE INSTALLATION OF 100 AMP ELECTRICAL SERVICE | | | TO SMALL CELL POLE. BASED ON THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED, | | | IT LOOKS LIKE A COMMUNICATIONS PERMIT IS REQUIRED. CITY | | | ORDINANCE NO. 4774-18. | | | NOTE: PLEASE SEE ZONING AND ENGINEERING COMMENTS. | | | | | | RESPONSE. | | | PLEASE SEE ZONING AND ENGINEERING COMMENTS. | | | | | | 2- TITLE SHEET T1 SPECIFIES "INSTALLATION OF PROPOSED | | | POWER FOR SMALL CELL EQUIPMENT ON PROPOSED METAL POLE". | | | SCOPE OF WORK IS NOT CLEAR. IS THERE A NEW METAL POLE | | | OR IS IT EXISTING INSTALLED BY FPL.?. PLANS ALSO SHOW | | | VERIZON WIRELESS ENCLOSURE ATTACHED TO THE POLE. THERE | | | ARE NO SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE ATTACHMENT OF THIS | | | ENCLOSURE TO THE POLE. IS THIS DONE UNDER ANOTHER | | | PERMIT?. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | PROVIDE PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR | | | THE PROPOSED METAL POLE AND VERIZON WIRELESS ENCLOSURE | | | ATTACHMENT IF THEY ARE PART OF THIS PERMIT. SEC. 1609.1 | | | FBC-BUILDING. | | | | | | RESPONSE: | | | A) IT IS NOT CLEAR IF A NEW POLE WILL BE INSTALLED OR | | | NOT. IF NEW POLE IS INSTALLED, THEN PROVIDE COMPLETE | | | ENGINEERING DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS, INCLUDING THE | | | EFFECTIVE PROJECTIVE AREA OF THE POLE AND PROPOSED | | | EQUIPMENT TO BE INSTALLED IN IT. | | | PLANS ALSO SHOW VERIZON WIRELESS ENCLOSURES ATTACHED TO | | | THE POLE. THERE ARE NO SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE | | | ATTACHMENT OF THIS ENCLOSURES TO THE POLE. SEC. 1609.1 | | | FBC-BUILDING. ALSO, PROVIDE ALL THE WIND DESIGN DATA AS | | | REQUIRED BY SEC. 1603.4 FBC-BUILDING. | | | | | | B)PROVIDE POLE MANUFACTURER'S SPECS MEETING THE | | | ENGINEER'S DESIGN CRITERIA. ENGINEER OF RECORD TO | | | REVIEW/APPROVED POLE SPECS PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL. SEC. | | | 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | | | | 3- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS LOW. | | | VALUATION TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, CONTRACTOR'S | | | OVERHEAD AND PROFIT AND DESIGN PROFESSIONAL FEES AS | | | REQUIRED BY SEC. 109.3 CITY AMENDMENTS. UPDATE | | | VALUATION AS REQUIRED, INCLUDING DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | | | FEES. | | | | | | RESPONSE | | | NOT ADDRESSED. SCOPE OF WORK IS NOT CLEAR. UNABLE TO | | | DETERMINE VALUE. | | | | | | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY | | | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | BUILDING DIVISION | | | (561)805-6712 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2020-07-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2020-07-02 |
Time |
17:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2020-06-17 |
Time |
16:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-07-02 18:00:11 | BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS | | | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | 1- APPLICATION WAS SUBMITTED AS AN ELECTRICAL PERMIT | | | ONLY FOR THE INSTALLATION OF 100 AMP ELECTRICAL SERVICE | | | TO SMALL CELL POLE. BASED ON THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED, | | | IT LOOKS LIKE A COMMUNICATIONS PERMIT IS REQUIRED. CITY | | | ORDINANCE NO. 4774-18. | | | NOTE: PLEASE SEE ZONING AND ENGINEERING COMMENTS. | | | | | | 2- TITLE SHEET T1 SPECIFIES "INSTALLATION OF PROPOSED | | | POWER FOR SMALL CELL EQUIPMENT ON PROPOSED METAL POLE". | | | SCOPE OF WORK IS NOT CLEAR. IS THERE A NEW METAL POLE | | | OR IS IT EXISTING INSTALLED BY FPL.?. PLANS ALSO SHOW | | | VERIZON WIRELESS ENCLOSURE ATTACHED TO THE POLE. THERE | | | ARE NO SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE ATTACHMENT OF THIS | | | ENCLOSURE TO THE POLE. IS THIS DONE UNDER ANOTHER | | | PERMIT. ? SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | PROVIDE PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR | | | THE PROPOSED METAL POLE AND VERIZON WIRELESS ENCLOSURE | | | ATTACHMENT IF THEY ARE PART OF THIS PERMIT. SEC. 1609.1 | | | FBC-BUILDING. | | | | | | 3- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS LOW. | | | VALUATION TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, CONTRACTOR'S | | | OVERHEAD AND PROFIT AND DESIGN PROFESSIONAL FEES AS | | | REQUIRED BY SEC. 109.3 CITY AMENDMENTS. UPDATE | | | VALUATION AS REQUIRED, INCLUDING DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | | | FEES. | | | | | | 4- PLANS SUBMITTED HAVE A COPY OF THE ENGINEER'S SEAL | | | AND SIGNATURE. PLANS NEED TO HAVE THE ORIGINAL SEAL AND | | | SIGNATURE OF THE ENGINEER OF RECORD AS REQUIRED BY SEC. | | | 61G15-23.003 FAC AND CHAPTER 471 F.S. WHEN SUBMITTING | | | PLANS/DOCUMENTS FOR PUBLIC RECORDS. ENGINEER TO SUBMIT | | | PLANS WITH ORIGINAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE OR ENGINEER MAY | | | SUBMIT PLANS WITH DIGITAL SIGNATURE IF FOLLOWING THE | | | PROCEDURE OF SEC. 61G15-23.004 FAC. | | | | | | ENGINEERS | | | 61G15-23.004 PROCEDURES FOR DIGITALLY SIGNING AND | | | SEALING ELECTRONICALLY TRANSMITTED PLANS, | | | SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS. | | | | | | | | | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY | | | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | BUILDING DIVISION | | | (561)805-6712 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2021-10-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleahy |
Date |
2021-10-28 |
Time |
11:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleahy |
Date |
2021-10-28 |
Time |
11:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-08-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleahy |
Date |
2021-08-27 |
Time |
15:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleahy |
Date |
2021-08-27 |
Time |
15:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-08-27 15:13:48 | ELECTRICAL REVIEW STATUS: DENIED, SEE COMMENTS BELOW. | | | | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2017 6TH EDITION | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ENERGY CONSERVATION 2017 6TH ED | | | NFPA 70 2014 EDITION | | | | | | JAKE LEAHY BN, BU, PX | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER II | | | 561-805-6713 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | WITH THE PANEL BEING IN THE POLE HOW DOES IT COMPLY | | | WITH 110.26 FOR WORKING CLEARANCES? |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2021-06-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleahy |
Date |
2021-06-17 |
Time |
13:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleahy |
Date |
2021-06-17 |
Time |
13:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-03-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleahy |
Date |
2021-03-05 |
Time |
12:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleahy |
Date |
2021-03-05 |
Time |
07:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-03-05 12:45:08 | REVIEW COMMENTS FROM 3/23/20 HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED ALL | | | BUT #1 PLEASE SEE COMMENTS AND REPLY. JLEAHY | | | | | | JAKE LEAHY BN, BU, PX | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER II | | | 561-805-6713 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2020-03-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jpearson |
Date |
2020-03-23 |
Time |
15:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jpearson |
Date |
2020-03-23 |
Time |
15:30 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2020-03-23 15:30:45 | CODES IN EFFECT: | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2017 6TH EDITION | | | WPB FBC = WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC 2017 | | | 6TH ED, CHAPTER 1. | | | FBC EC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ENERGY CONSERVATION 2017 | | | 6TH EDITION | | | FBC EX = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE EXISTING BUILDING 2017 | | | 6TH EDITION | | | FBC RE = FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE 2017 6TH EDITION | | | NEC = NFPA 70 2014 EDITION, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE | | | FS = FLORIDA STATUTES | | | FAC = FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | | | | ELECTRICAL REVIEW STATUS: DENIED, SEE COMMENTS BELOW. | | | | | | 1. VALUE FOR WORK STATED ON PERMIT APPLICATION APPEARS | | | LOW. PROVIDE COPY OF SIGNED CONTRACT WITH SCOPE AND | | | VALUE OF WORK, TO INCLUDE ALL MATERIALS AND LABOR. THIS | | | IS FOR TOTAL PROJECT, NOT JUST ELECTRICAL. WPB FBC | | | 109.3 | | | 2. PROVIDE AVAILABLE SHORT CIRCUIT CALCULATION FOR | | | SERVICE INCLUDING INFORMATION FROM THE POWER COMPANY | | | STATING WHAT THE AVAILABLE SHORT CIRCUIT CURRENT IS FOR | | | THE SERVICE TO CONFIRM THE STATED AIC RATING OF THE | | | SERVICE EQUIPMENT IS ADEQUATE. NEC 110.9, 110.10 | | | 3. PROVIDE AIC RATING OF ANY SERVICE DISCONNECTS AND | | | PANELS. NEC 110.3, 110.9 | | | 4. PROVIDE NOTES TO INDICATE THE REQUIRED MARKING OF | | | SERVICE EQUIPMENT FOR ARC FLASH HAZARD WARNING AND | | | AVAILABLE FAULT CURRENT PER CODE. NEC 110.16, 110.24 | | | 5. PROVIDE GROUNDING DETAIL FOR SERVICE ON RISER | | | DIAGRAM. NEC 215.5, 250; WPB FBC 107.2.1 | | | 6. PROVIDE WIND LOAD DESIGN CRITERIA FOR POWER POLE. | | | FBC 1609.1 | | | | | | END OF COMMENTS. | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED | | | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. WHEN | | | RESUBMITTING, PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH | | | ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY RESUBMITTAL FORM. | | | ADDITIONALLY, INSERT CORRECTED PAGES INTO THE ORIGINAL | | | SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS. | | | ONE COPY OF THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS SHOULD | | | REMAIN IN PACKAGE AND BE MARKED OLD SHEETS. | | | | | | SINCERELY, | | | | | | JOHN PEARSON | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6746 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2021-07-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
gpatrie |
Date |
2021-07-07 |
Time |
06:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
gpatrie |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-07-07 06:57:24 | I WILL REVIEW THE WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY | | | PERMIT WITH REGARD TO THIS. | | | | | | CONTACT: [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-05-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
gpatrie |
Date |
2021-05-05 |
Time |
07:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
gpatrie |
Date |
2021-05-05 |
Time |
07:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-05-05 07:55:00 | SEE PREVIOUS COMMENTS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2020-09-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
gpatrie |
Date |
2020-09-16 |
Time |
07:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
gpatrie |
Date |
2020-09-16 |
Time |
07:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-09-16 07:02:42 | NO PLOE DESIGN SHOWN. | | | OKEECHOBEE IS A FDOT ROADWAY. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2021-10-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mpeterso |
Date |
2021-10-14 |
Time |
09:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mpeterso |
Date |
2021-08-11 |
Time |
09:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2021-07-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2021-07-08 |
Time |
17:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2021-06-10 |
Time |
11:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2021-06-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-06-07 |
Time |
14:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-06-07 |
Time |
13:57 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2021-06-07 14:02:08 | NOTE: | | | CHRISTINA WARR SEND ME EMAIL ON 06/03/21 LISTING | | | SEVERAL PROJECTS, INCLUDING THIS ONE 20030974. T | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2021-05-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2021-05-06 |
Time |
08:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2021-03-01 |
Time |
07:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2020-09-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2020-09-21 |
Time |
17:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2020-06-17 |
Time |
12:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-06-17 16:53:57 | 06/17/2020 NEW INCOMING STOP WAS ADDED BECAUSE A | | | COMMUNICATIONS PERMIT MAY BE REQUIRED (CITY ORDINANCE | | | NO. 4774-18). THEREFORE, ZONING AND ENGINEERING REVIEWS | | | WERE ADDED. JG. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
2020-03-23 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2020-03-19 |
Time |
15:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-03-19 15:33:54 | ELEC<5K |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2021-10-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mpeterso |
Date |
2021-10-14 |
Time |
09:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mpeterso |
Date |
2021-10-14 |
Time |
09:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-10-14 08:46:33 | APPEARS AS ALL DOCUMENTS ARE DIGITALLY SIGNED | | | MICHAEL PETERSON | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6746 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2021-06-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-06-24 |
Time |
13:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-06-24 |
Time |
13:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2021-03-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-03-09 |
Time |
13:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-03-09 |
Time |
13:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-03-09 13:17:59 | DRAWINGS T1, E1, E2, E3, E4, E5, E6 AND MT1 HAVE | | | DIGITAL SIGNATURE. JG. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2020-07-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2020-07-02 |
Time |
17:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2020-07-02 |
Time |
17:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-07-02 17:47:47 | 1-ENGINEER DRAWINGS SUBMITTED DON'T HAVE THE ENGINEER'S | | | ORIGINAL SIGNATURE. PLANS SUBMITTED HAVE A COPY OF THE | | | ENGINEER'S SIGNATURE. PLANS NEED TO HAVE THE ORIGINAL | | | SEAL AND SIGNATURE OF THE ENGINEER OF RECORD AS | | | REQUIRED BY SEC. 61G15-23.003 FAC AND CHAPTER 471 F.S. | | | WHEN SUBMITTING PLANS/DOCUMENTS FOR PUBLIC RECORDS. | | | | | | NOTE: | | | NEED TO PROVIDE HARD COPY OF DRAWINGS WITH ORIGINAL | | | SEAL AND SIGNATURE AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 472 F. S. OR | | | SUBMIT DIGITALLY SIGNED DRAWINGS FOLLOWING THE | | | PROCEDURE OF SEC.61G15-23.004. NOTE: COORDINATE WITH | | | CITY LIBRARIAN AT [email protected] FOR PROPER | | | UPLOADING. | | | | | | | | | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY | | | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | BUILDING DIVISION | | | (561)805-6712 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2021-10-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2021-10-28 |
Time |
14:26 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2021-10-28 |
Time |
14:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-10-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2021-10-08 |
Time |
13:24 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2021-09-21 |
Time |
08:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-10-08 13:29:27 | FAILED | | | | | | THE COMMUNICATION FACILITY PLACEMENT PERMIT - CITY | | | RIGHTS-OF-WAY HAS NOT BEEN ISSUED FOR THE PORTION OF | | | THIS FACILITY WITHIN THE CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY. PLEASE SEE | | | THE COMMENTS UNDER PERMIT NO. 21090908 FOR THE | | | CORRECTIONS THAT NEED TO BE MADE FOR THE CITY TO | | | APPROVE THE TWO PERMITS. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-07-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2021-07-02 |
Time |
11:33 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2021-07-01 |
Time |
15:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-07-02 09:37:16 | FAILED | | | | | | THE RESPONSE COMMENTS WERE FOR A DIFFERENT PERMIT, | | | PLEASE PROVIDE THE CORRECT COMMENTS. | | | | | | 1) THE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC WITHIN THE CHASE STREET | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY REQUIRES A CITY WIRELESS COMMUNICATION | | | FACILITY - ROW PERMIT. INFORMATION HAS BEEN SENT TO | | | CHRISTINA WARR REGARDING THE APPLICATION. ONCE IT IS | | | APPROVED, ZONING CAN COMPLETE THE REVIEW OF THE | | | ELECTRIC PERMIT. | | | | | | 2) ON GOING - PLEASE NOTE THAT THE CITY HAS APPROVED A | | | REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AT THIS LOCATION AND THE PROPOSED | | | POLE LOCATION APPEARS TO CONFLICT WITH THE FINAL DESIGN | | | OF THE IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY WHERE THE | | | POLE AND HANDHOLE ARE PROPOSED (POLE LOCATED A FEW FEET | | | TO THE SOUTH MAY CORRECT THIS). ADDITIONALLY, THE | | | DEVELOPER PLANS TO REMOVE THE POWER POLE THAT YOU | | | PROPOSE TO GET POWER FROM. THIS WILL NOT AFFECT THE | | | ZONING APPROVAL OF THE ELECTRIC PERMIT; HOWEVER IT DOES | | | AFFECT THE ULTIMATE PLACEMENT OF THE ITEMS WITHIN THE | | | FDOT ROW. | | | | | | POLE COMPLIES WITH CITY STEALTH REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-03-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2021-03-25 |
Time |
11:21 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2021-03-25 |
Time |
10:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-03-25 11:22:25 | FAILED | | | | | | PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSE TO COMMENTS, | | | | | | 1) THE PLANS SUBMITTED WITH THE PERMIT SHOW THAT THE | | | PROPOSED WIRELESS FACILITY (POLE) DOES NOT MEET THE | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CONCEALMENT (STEALTH) OR STYLE | | | REQUIREMENTS LISTED IN SECTIONS 78-411(E) AND 78-411(F) | | | OF THE CITY CODE. PROVIDE A POLE THAT MEETS THE CITY | | | CODE REQUIREMENTS. NOTE: VERIZON HAS SHOWN POLES ON | | | OTHER APPLICATIONS FOR OTHER LOCATIONS WITHIN THE CITY | | | THAT MEET THE CITY CODE REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 2) PLEASE NOTE THAT THE CITY HAS APPROVED A | | | REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AT THIS LOCATION AND THE PROPOSED | | | POLE LOCATION APPEARS TO CONFLICT WITH THE FINAL DESIGN | | | OF THE IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY WHERE THE | | | POLE AND HANDHOLE ARE PROPOSED (POLE LOCATED A FEW FEET | | | TO THE SOUTH MAY CORRECT THIS). PLEASE CONTACT ANA | | | MARIA APONTE, CITY URBAN DESIGNER, @ (561) 822-1439 OR | | | [email protected] FOR MORE DETAILS. ADDITIONALLY, THE | | | DEVELOPER PLANS TO REMOVE THE POWER POLE THAT YOU | | | PROPOSE TO GET POWER FROM. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2020-07-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2020-07-31 |
Time |
10:37 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2020-07-31 |
Time |
10:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-07-31 10:41:46 | FAILED | | | | | | 1) PROVIDE A PROVIDE A SURVEY, PREPARED BY A FLORIDA | | | LICENSED SURVEYOR, WHICH SHOWS THE POLE LOCATION AND | | | THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THE | | | WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY IS WITHIN THE | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY AND NOT ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. | | | | | | 2) PROVIDE A COPY OF THE FDOT APPROVAL IF THE SURVEY | | | SHOWS THE PROPOSED WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY IN | | | THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | | | | 3) THE PLANS SUBMITTED WITH THE PERMIT SHOW THAT THE | | | PROPOSED WIRELESS FACILITY (POLE) DOES NOT MEET THE | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CONCEALMENT (STEALTH) OR STYLE | | | AND POSSIBLY HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS LISTED IN SECTIONS | | | 78-411(E), 78-411(F) AND 78-411(G) OF THE CITY CODE. | | | PROVIDE A POLE THAT MEETS THE CITY CODE REQUIREMENTS. | | | NOTE: VERIZON HAS SHOWN POLES ON OTHER APPLICATIONS FOR | | | OTHER LOCATIONS WITHIN THE CITY THAT MEET THE CITY CODE | | | REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 4) PLEASE NOTE THAT THE CITY HAS APPROVED A | | | REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AT THIS LOCATION AND THE PROPOSED | | | POLE LOCATION APPEARS TO CONFLICT WITH THE FINAL DESIGN | | | OF THE IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE AREA (POLE LOCATED A FEW | | | FEET TO THE SOUTH MAY CORRECT THIS). PLEASE CONTACT ANA | | | MARIA APONTE, CITY URBAN DESIGNER, @ (561) 822-1439 OR | | | [email protected] FOR MORE DETAILS. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
