| Plan Review Stops For Permit 20030601 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-10-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pvalenti |
Date |
2020-10-17 |
Time |
10:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pvalenti |
Date |
2020-10-17 |
Time |
10:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-10-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pvalenti |
Date |
2020-10-05 |
Time |
08:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pvalenti |
Date |
2020-10-05 |
Time |
07:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-07-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pvalenti |
Date |
2020-07-06 |
Time |
08:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pvalenti |
Date |
2020-07-06 |
Time |
06:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2020-04-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jbrooks |
Date |
2020-04-02 |
Time |
12:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jbrooks |
Date |
2020-04-02 |
Time |
12:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-04-02 12:20:35 | JONATHAN BROOKS JR. | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | WORK HOURS TUESDAY & THURSDAY 7:00 AM TO 3:00 PM | | | (561) 805-6716 ALTERNATE: CONTACT SAMANTHA HILL (561) | | | 805-6724 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | 1ST REVIEW: FBC 2017 6TH EDITION | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 6TH EDITION (2017) | | | FBC B = FBC BUILDING | | | FBC R = FBC RESIDENTIAL | | | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING | | | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY | | | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION | | | WPB A = CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENMENTS TO THE FBC | | | RESULTS: DENIED | | | ADDRESS THE ATTACHED COMMENTS AND RE-SUBMIT | | | IF THE RESUBMITTAL IS NOT PREPARED BY A DESIGN | | | PROFESSIONAL (ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER), AND THE PAGES ARE | | | 11X17 OR SMALLER, YOU MAY RESUBMIT ALONG WITH A | | | COMPLETED RESUBMITTAL FORM, VIA EMAIL TO | | | [email protected]. THE EMAIL SHOULD INCLUDE THE PERMIT | | | NUMBER AND "RESUBMITTAL" IN THE SUBJECT LINE. THE | | | RESUBMITTAL FORM CAN BE FOUND AT THIS WEBSITE: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/DEVELOPMENT-SERVICES/FORMS/B | | | UILDING-PERMIT-FORMS | | | | | | 1. PLEASE ADDRESS ZONING COMMENTS. | | | 2. FBC B 107.2.1. SUBMITTED DRAWINGS INDICATE 3 SHEETS; | | | SHEET 2 OF 3 SHEETS MISSING, PROVIDE TWO SETS. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-09-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleahy |
Date |
2020-09-29 |
Time |
07:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleahy |
Date |
2020-09-29 |
Time |
07:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-07-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleahy |
Date |
2020-07-05 |
Time |
16:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleahy |
Date |
2020-07-05 |
Time |
15:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-04-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jpearson |
Date |
2020-04-10 |
Time |
07:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jpearson |
Date |
2020-04-07 |
Time |
07:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2020-11-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cpuell |
Date |
2020-11-02 |
Time |
08:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cpuell |
Date |
2020-10-09 |
Time |
10:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2020-10-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2020-10-07 |
Time |
06:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2020-09-24 |
Time |
11:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2020-07-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2020-07-15 |
Time |
13:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2020-06-30 |
Time |
14:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2020-04-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jbrooks |
Date |
2020-04-10 |
Time |
12:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2020-03-12 |
Time |
11:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-04-02 18:46:05 | TO ELECTRICAL | | 2020-04-01 10:41:17 | BLDG MISC 2 | | 2020-03-13 11:01:32 | ROUTED TO ZONING INBOX |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-10-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pvalenti |
Date |
2020-10-17 |
Time |
10:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pvalenti |
Date |
2020-10-17 |
Time |
10:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-10-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pvalenti |
Date |
2020-10-05 |
Time |
08:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pvalenti |
Date |
2020-10-05 |
Time |
07:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-07-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pvalenti |
Date |
2020-07-06 |
Time |
08:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pvalenti |
Date |
2020-07-06 |
Time |
06:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2020-04-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2020-04-08 |
Time |
10:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2020-04-08 |
Time |
10:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-04-08 10:09:26 | ENGINEER'S ORIGINAL SEAL/SIGNATURE IN CITY'S HARD COPY | | | SUBMITTAL. | | | IF REVISED, FUTURE SUBMITTALS WILL NEED TO BE REVIEWED. | | | SINCE THIS APPLICATION WAS CONVERTED TO DIGITAL, | | | ENGINEER'S DIGITAL SIGNATURE VIA CITY'S PROJECTDOX | | | SYSTEM IS RECOMMENDED. JG. | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-11-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2020-11-02 |
Time |
08:24 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2020-10-28 |
Time |
14:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-10-28 15:47:37 | THIS IS A SIGN TYPE 1A - FASCIA IDENTITY SIGN | | | | | | PERMITTED: 53 SF | | | PROPOSED: 10.99 SF | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2020-10-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2020-10-06 |
Time |
14:40 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2020-10-06 |
Time |
13:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-10-06 14:42:35 | FAILED | | | | | | THIS IS A SIGN TYPE 1A - FASCIA IDENTITY SIGN | | | | | | 1) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA REQUIRE | | | THAT REVERSE CHANNEL LETTERS ARE FABRICATED OUT OF | | | ALUMINUM WITH A MINIMUM METAL THICKNESS OF .060 INCHES. | | | THE THICKNESS IS NOT PROVIDED. | | | | | | 2) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA REQUIRE THE | | | STUD MOUNTS TO BE SERIES 316 STAINLESS STEEL ANCHOR | | | BOLTS. PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THE STAINLESS STEEL | | | STUDS SHOWN ON THE PLANS COMPLY WITH THIS | | | | | | 3) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA REQUIRES | | | THAT ALL CONDUIT, CROSSOVERS, WIRING NECESSARY FOR THE | | | SIGN?S ELECTRICAL CONNECTION TO BE CONCEALED AND NOT | | | VISIBLE TO THE PUBLIC. THE WIRES FROM THE WALL TO THE | | | SIGN ARE EXPOSED. | | | | | | 4) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA REQUIRE | | | THAT THE CHANNEL DEPTH CAN BE NO MORE THAN FOUR (4) | | | INCHES. THE DEPTH WAS NOT PROVIDED ON THE PLANS. | | | | | | PERMITTED: 53 SF | | | PROPOSED: 10.99 SF | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2020-07-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2020-07-15 |
Time |
11:34 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2020-07-15 |
Time |
09:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-07-15 11:28:18 | FAILED | | | | | | THIS IS A SIGN TYPE 1A - FASCIA IDENTITY SIGN | | | | | | 1) UPDATED COMMENT: THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN | | | CRITERIA PERMIT A MAXIMUM SIGN PANEL (THE DECK CABINET) | | | AND LETTER HEIGHT OF 18 INCHES FOR A FASCIA IDENTITY | | | SIGN UNLESS CITYPLACE RETAIL IS GRANTED A WAIVER II | | | (MINOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT). THE LETTER FROM | | | CITYPLACE RETAIL DOES NOT APPROVE THE WAIVER II. A | | | WAIVER II MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION AS | | | A MINOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT. CURRENTLY, THE | | | WAIVER II MAY INCREASE THE SIGNS DIMENSION BY UP TO 25 | | | PERCENT, SO THE SIGN PANEL (THE DECK CABINET) AND | | | LETTER HEIGHT COULD BE UP TO 22.5 INCHES. SINCE THE | | | PROPOSED SIGN IS 23 INCHES IN HEIGHT, THIS DIMENSION IS | | | CURRENTLY NOT PERMITTED. HOWEVER, CITYPLACE RETAIL HAS | | | AN AMENDMENT TO THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN | | | CRITERIA SUBMITTED THAT, IF APPROVED IN SEPTEMBER, | | | WOULD PERMIT THE WAIVER II TO ALLOW SIGN TYPE 1A - | | | FASCIA IDENTITY SIGN TO INCREASE IN DIMENSION UP TO | | | 50%. YOU CAN EITHER REDUCE THE SIGN SIZE NOW AND | | | CITYPLACE RETAIL APPLIES FOR A WAIVER II UNDER THE | | | CURRENT REGULATIONS OR WAIT FOR THE AMENDED REGULATIONS | | | TO PASS AND GET THE LARGER DIMENSION AFTER A WAIVER II | | | WITH THE APPROVAL OF A FUTURE WAIVER II. | | | | | | 2) REPEAT COMMENT: THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN | | | CRITERIA REQUIRE THAT LETTER CHANNELS ARE TO BE STUD | | | MOUNTED A MAXIMUM ONE (1) INCH FROM THE WALL. THE | | | PROPOSED DESIGN WITH AN ALUMINUM DECK CABINET MOUNTED | | | TO THE WALL AND THE CHANNEL LETTERS MOUNTED TO THE | | | CABINET IS NOT PERMITTED. PLEASE REFER TO THE ROSEMARY | | | SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA FOR THE REQUIREMENTS | | | REGARDING THE USE OF CHANNEL LETTERS VS THE USE OF A | | | PANEL DESIGN. | | | | | | | | | PERMITTED: 53 SF | | | PROPOSED: 23.8 SF | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2020-03-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2020-03-31 |
Time |
15:55 |
Rev Time |
0.75 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2020-03-31 |
Time |
15:55 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2020-03-31 15:56:18 | FAILED | | | | | | 1) THE SIGN INCLUDES NOT ONLY THE TD AND THE AMERITRADE | | | TEXT, BUT ALSO THE DECK CABINET, WHICH MAKES THE ENTIRE | | | SIGN 23.8 SQUARE FEET. | | | | | | 2) THE PROPOSED SIGN IS A FASCIA SIGN IN THE ROSEMARY | | | SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA. FASCIA SIGNS ARE PERMITTED | | | ON A CASE-BY-CASE BASIS FOR SINGLE HEIGHT TENANTS | | | WITHOUT ARCADES (STOREFRONT TYPE 3). SIGNS PERMITTED ON | | | A CASE-BY-CASE BASIS REQUIRE THE APPROVAL OF A WAIVER | | | I, WHICH IS WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM CITYPLACE RETAIL ON | | | THEIR LETTERHEAD. | | | | | | 3) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA REQUIRE | | | THAT THE WALL SIGNS (WHICH INCLUDE FASCIA SIGNS) BE | | | BALANCED WITHIN THE SIGN SPACE. PLEASE PROVIDE THE | | | DIMENSIONS FROM THE SIGN TEXT TO EACH END OF THE DECK | | | CABINET. THESE DIMENSIONS MUST BE EQUAL. | | | | | | 4) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA PROHIBIT | | | VISIBLE WIRING. THE ELEVATION DRAWING SHOWS VISIBLE | | | WIRES RUNNING FROM THE BACK OF EACH LETTER TO THE DECK | | | CABINET. | | | | | | 5) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA PERMIT | | | FASCIA SIGNS TO HAVE A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF TWELVE FEET | | | FROM FINISHED GRADE. THE PROPOSED SIGN WILL EXCEED THIS | | | HEIGHT (11 FEET + 1 FOOT 11 INCHES). | | | | | | 6) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA PERMIT A | | | MAXIMUM SIGN PANEL (THE DECK CABINET) AND LETTER HEIGHT | | | OF 18 INCHES FOR A FASCIA SIGN UNLESS CITYPLACE RETAIL | | | IS GRANTED A WAIVER II (MINOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT | | | AMENDMENT). THE WAIVER II MAY INCREASE THE SIGNS | | | DIMENSION BY UP TO 25 PERCENT, SO THE SIGN PANEL (THE | | | DECK CABINET) AND LETTER HEIGHT COULD BE UP TO 22.5 | | | INCHES. NOTE: THE PROPOSED SIGN IS 23 INCHES IN HEIGHT. | | | | | | 7) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA REQUIRE | | | THAT LETTER CHANNELS ARE TO BE STUD MOUNTED A MAXIMUM | | | ONE (1) INCH FROM THE WALL. THE PROPOSED DESIGN WITH A | | | DECK CABINET MOUNTED TO THE WALL AND THE CHANNEL | | | LETTERS MOUNTED TO THE DECK PANEL DOES IS NOT | | | PERMITTED. | | | | | | 8) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA REQUIRE THE | | | STUD MOUNTS TO BE SERIES 316 STAINLESS STEEL ANCHOR | | | BOLTS. PROVIDE VERIFICATION OF THIS REQUIREMENT ON THE | | | PLANS. | | | | | | PERMITTED: 53 SF | | | PROPOSED: 23.8 SF | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|