| 2020-01-06 19:01:34 | PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS FOR REVISION #19120609 |
| | |
| | 1ST REVIEW: FBC SIXTH EDITION (2017) |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: |
| | |
| | 1) THE ONE REVISED PLAN SHEET LABELED "GROUND |
| | FLOOR/REFLECTED CEILING PLAN" THAT SHOWS THE RECESSED |
| | LIGHTS AND STUCCO REPAIR IS OKAY, OTHER THAN IT HAS THE |
| | SAME DRAWING NUMBER "A-1" AS THE PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS |
| | FOR THE GROUND AND UPPER LEVEL. A REFLECTED CEILING |
| | PLAN HAD NOT BEEN SUBMITTED PREVIOUSLY. PLEASE ASSIGN A |
| | NEW DRAWING NUMBER TO THIS DRAWING TO SHOW THAT IT IS |
| | NOT REVISING PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED DRAWINGS. FBC |
| | 107.2.1.3 |
| | |
| | 2) IN ADDITION TO THE ONE NEW SHEET, THREE OTHER SHEETS |
| | WERE SUBMITTED. THE FEES THAT WERE CHARGED ARE FOR ONLY |
| | A ONE PAGE REVISION. DURING MY REVIEW I DISCOVERED |
| | THERE WAS SOME REQUIRED ITEMS MISSING FROM THE APPROVED |
| | PLANS AND THAT THE WINDOWS SHOWN ON THE BUILDING'S |
| | NORTH ELEVATION ON SHEET A-2 DIFFER FROM THE APPROVED |
| | PLANS. THIS WILL REQUIRE A REVISION. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 3) I DID NOT SEE A WINDOW SCHEDULE ON THE APPROVED |
| | PLANS. PLEASE SUBMIT A WINDOW SCHEDULE THAT SHOWS THE |
| | TYPE AND SIZE OF THE WINDOWS THAT WILL BE INSTALLED. |
| | FBC 107.2.1.2 |
| | |
| | 4) A REVISED STRUCTURAL PLAN THAT SPECIFIES THE |
| | REQUIRED DESIGN PRESSURES FOR EACH OF THE WINDOWS AND |
| | EXTERIOR DOORS IS REQUIRED. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 5) PRODUCT APPROVALS AND SHOP DRAWINGS FOR THE STORE |
| | FRONT WINDOWS AND EXTERIOR DOORS ARE REQUIRED TO BE |
| | SUBMITTED. THIS CAN BE DONE AS A DEFERRED SUBMITAL IF |
| | YOU WOULD LIKE. FBC 107.3.4.1 & FBC 107.3.4 |
| | |
| | 6) THE CALCULATIONS FOR ALLOWABLE OPENING AREA FOR THE |
| | NORTH ELEVATION WILL NEED TO BE REVISED BASED ON THE |
| | CHANGES TO THE WINDOW OPENINGS. THE APPROVED PLANS |
| | INDICATE THE ALLOWABLE AREA OF OPENINGS IS 25 PERCENT. |
| | PROVIDE THE CRITERIA THAT WAS USED TO DETERMINE THE 25 |
| | PERCENT. IS THE BUILDING FULLY SPRINKLERED? WHAT IS THE |
| | DISTANCE FROM THE WALL TO THE CENTER LINE OF THE |
| | ADJACENT ALLEY? WHAT IS THE REQUIRED FIRE-RESISTANCE |
| | RATING OF THE EXTERIOR BEARING WALLS, EXTERIOR |
| | NON-BEARING WALLS AND EXTERIOR PRIMARY EXTERIOR FRAME? |
| | FBC 705.8.1 |
| | |
| | 7) THE PLANS SHOW THAT A PORTION OF THE EXTERIOR GROUND |
| | FLOOR COVERED AREA AT THE EAST ELEVATION IS BEING |
| | ENCLOSED TO BECOME PART OF THE CONDITIONED BUILDING |
| | SPACE. PLEASE INDICATE THE DIMENSIONS AND THE AREA OF |
| | THIS ADDED SPACE ON THE PLANS. THIS IS REQUIRED TO BE |
| | REVIEWED BY PALM BEACH COUNTY TO DETERMINE IF ANY |
| | IMPACT FEES ARE DUE. PLANS REQUIRE REVIEW BY THE PBC |
| | IMPACT FEE OFFICE. CALL (561) 233-5025. YOU WILL NEED |
| | TO CHECK OUT ONE PLAN SET AND TAKE IT TO THAT OFFICE |
| | FOR REVIEW. PLEASE RETURNED STAMPED AND WITH A COPY OF |
| | THE PAID RECEIPT AS APPLICABLE. PLEASE PROVIDE THE |
| | MUNICIPAL IMPACT FEE QUESTIONNAIRE FORM TO THE PBC |
| | IMPACT FEE OFFICE. THE FORM CAN BE FOUND AT: |
| | HTTP://DISCOVER.PBCGOV.ORG/PZB/AD |
| | MINISTRATION/PDF/IMPACTFEES/FORMS/QUESTIONNAIRE.PDF |
| | |
| | 8) WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A |
| | RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE |
| | CITY RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE INSERT |
| | CORRECTED PLAN SHEETS INTO THE SETS, REMOVE THE |
| | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS AND MARK VOID ON THEM, AND |
| | KEEP THEM WITH THE SUBMITTALS. |