| 2019-10-31 17:52:25 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) RE-ROOF BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 1- FLAT ROOF RAS 117 CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: |
| | A)CALCULATIONS ARE NOT SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE |
| | ENGINEER. CALCULATIONS NEED TO HAVE THE ORIGINAL SEAL |
| | AND SIGNATURE OF THE ENGINEER AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | 61G15-23.003 FAC AND CHAPTER 471 F.S. WHEN SUBMITTING |
| | PLANS/DOCUMENTS FOR PUBLIC RECORDS. |
| | |
| | 2- ENGINEER TO PROVIDE SKETCH SHOWING HOW 8 ROWS OF |
| | FASTENERS ARE GOING TO BE PLACED ON THE FIELD AREA OF |
| | THE UNDERLAYMENT.. (SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS). IT |
| | LOOKS LIKE PLACING 8 ROWS OF FASTENERS IN THE FIELD |
| | AREA WON'T COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM FASTENER SEPARATION |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 8.1 OF RAS 117. THE FASTENER |
| | SEPARATION SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 4IN O.C.. REVISE |
| | CALCULATIONS OR PROVIDE DETAIL SHOWING THE PLACEMENT OF |
| | ALL 8 ROWS. |
| | |
| | 3- IT IS NOT CLEAR WHICH SHINGLES ARE GOING TO BE |
| | INSTALLED. THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT NOA'S SUBMITTED. GAF |
| | SHINGLES NOA 18-0123.06 AND CERTAIN TEED SHINGLES NOA |
| | 17-1211.08. PROVIDE TWO COPIES OF THE SPECIFIC SHINGLES |
| | TO BE INSTALLED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | NOTE: SHINGLES NOA 18--0123.06 IS MISSING THE LAST PAGE |
| | OF THE NOA. PROVIDE COMPLETE NOA IS USING THIS PRODUCT. |
| | |
| | IN ORDER TO AVOID MULTIPLE SUBMITTALS, PLEASE FEEL FREE |
| | TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE |
| | COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
