Plan Review Details - Permit 19100999
Plan Review Stops For Permit 19100999
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2020-01-22 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2020-01-22 Time 14:32 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2020-01-22 Time 13:45 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2019-12-23 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2019-12-23 Time 14:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2019-12-23 Time 14:30 Sent To  
Notes
2019-12-23 14:39:19RESIDENTIAL (R3) EXTERIOR DECK SECOND BUILDING REVIEW
 COMMENTS
 CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 NOTE: SEC. 801.3 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. ALL NEW
 CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, SYSTEMS, AND SPACES
 SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE, BUILDING.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 1- THE FRAMING OF THE PROPOSED DECK DOESN'T SEEM TO BE
 A CONVENTIONAL FLOOR FRAMING DESIGN. ENGINEER OF RECORD
 TO PROVIDE A COMPLETE ENGINEERING ANALYSIS SHOWING HOW
 THE PROPOSED FRAMING WILL MEET ALL DESIGN LOADS. LIVE
 LOADS, DEAD LOADS, WIND LOADS, ETC. ALSO, ENGINEER TO
 SPECIFY THE THICKNESS OF THE DECK BOARD AND PROVIDE
 COMPLETE SPECIFICATIONS FROM DECK MANUFACTURER SHOWING
 THAT THE DECK BOARD MEETS THE DESIGN SPAN SHOWN ON
 PLANS. SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS AND SEC. R507
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 RESPONSE:
 CONVENTIONAL FLOOR FRAMING DETAIL FOR DECKS IS FOR
 EXAMPLE 1X6 DECKING SUPPORTED ON 2X8 JOISTS AT 16" O.C.
 AS SPECIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR ON HIS PROPOSAL. THE
 ENGINEER OF RECORD IS PROPOSING 1X6 TREX DECK BOARDS
 SUPPORTED AT 4'-0" O.C. ENGINEER DIDN'T PROVIDE
 MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING THAT THE 1X6 TREX
 BOARDS WILL MEET THE 4'-0" PROPOSED SPAN. ALSO, SEE
 TABLE R507.4 FBC-RESIDENTIAL FOR MAXIMUM JOIST SPACING.
 (NOTE: PLASTIC COMPOSITE BOARD NEEDS TO MEET THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM D7032. SEE SEC. R507.3
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL).
 ALSO, THE LIVE LOAD SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER IS
 INCORRECT. SEE TABLE R301.5 AND REVISE AS REQUIRED.
 SINCE THE PROPOSED FRAMING PLAN IS NOT A CONVENTIONAL
 FRAMING, THAT'S WHY A COMPLETE ENGINEERING ANALYSIS IS
 REQUESTED. SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS AND SEC. R507
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 2- ENGINEER TO SPECIFY ALL DESIGN LOADS INCLUDING THE
 LIVE LOADS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R301.1 AND TABLE R301.5
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 RESPONSE:
 THE LIVE LOAD SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER IS INCORRECT.
 SEE TABLE R301.5 AND REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 3- THERE IS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE ENGINEER PLANS
 SUBMITTED AND THE "ITEM AND DESCRIPTION" SPECIFIED ON
 THE CONTRACTOR'S COPY OF CONTRACT SUBMITTED. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED TO MATCH TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. SEC.
 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 RESPONSE:
 THE PROPOSED FRAMING SPECIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND
 THE PROPOSED FRAMING SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER DON'T
 MATCH. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH.
  
 4- BASED ON PLANS SUBMITTED, IT LOOKS LIKE THE 4X4 WOOD
 POSTS ARE GOING TO BE BURIED IN THE GROUND. PROVIDE
 SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE TYPE OF WOOD THAT IS DESIGNED
 FOR THIS TYPE OF INSTALLATION. NOTE: COORDINATE WITH
 SPECIFICATIONS SHOWN ON THE CONTRACTOR'S CONTRACT. TO
 AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. SEC. R317.1.2 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 RESPONSE:
 ENGINEER TO SPECIFY TYPE OF WOOD (GROUND CONTACT).
 COORDINATE WITH SPECIFICATIONS SHOWN ON THE
 CONTRACTOR'S CONTRACT. TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. SEC.
 R317.1.2 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
  
  
 ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS
 FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B):
 WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS
 DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT NECESSARY, IN
 ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING
 CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT DESIGN DOCUMENTS
 REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE TIMES FOR FAILURE TO
 CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY
 NOTED IN EACH REJECTION, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO,
 EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION, STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY,
 ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL,
 MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS SYSTEMS, OR OTHER
 REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING
 COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL
 GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH
 REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION,
 A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT OF THE PROPORTION OF THE
 PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS REVIEW
  
  
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION &
 REMOVE ANY VOIDED SHEETS & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS
 NECESSARY. PLEASE, SUBMIT OLD DRAWINGS FOR REFERENCE.
 A TRANSMITTAL LETTER FROM THE ENGINEER LISTING THE
 ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF
 THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR
 SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL
 HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR
 ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
 IN ORDER TO AVOID MULTIPLE SUBMITTALS, PLEASE FEEL FREE
 TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE
 COMMENTS,
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2019-11-06 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2019-11-06 Time 10:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2019-11-05 Time 17:18 Sent To  
Notes
2019-11-05 19:04:31RESIDENTIAL (R3) EXTERIOR DECK BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS
 CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 NOTE: SEC. 801.3 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. ALL NEW
 CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, SYSTEMS, AND SPACES
 SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE, BUILDING.
  
 1- THE FRAMING OF THE PROPOSED WOOD DECK DOESN'T SEEM
 TO BE A CONVENTIONAL FLOOR FRAMING DESIGN. ENGINEER OF
 RECORD TO PROVIDE A COMPLETE ENGINEERING ANALYSIS
 SHOWING HOW THE PROPOSED FRAMING WILL MEET ALL DESIGN
 LOADS. LIVE LOADS, DEAD LOADS, WIND LOADS, ETC. ALSO,
 ENGINEER TO SPECIFY THE THICKNESS OF THE DECK BOARD AND
 PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECIFICATIONS FROM DECK MANUFACTURER
 SHOWING THAT THE DECK BOARD MEETS THE DESIGN SPAN SHOWN
 ON PLANS. SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS AND SEC. R507
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 2- ENGINEER TO SPECIFY ALL DESIGN LOADS INCLUDING THE
 LIVE LOADS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R301.1 AND TABLE R301.5
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 3- THERE IS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE ENGINEER PLANS
 SUBMITTED AND THE "ITEM AND DESCRIPTION" SPECIFIED ON
 THE CONTRACTOR'S COPY OF CONTRACT SUBMITTED. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED TO MATCH TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. SEC.
 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 4- BASED ON PLANS SUBMITTED, IT LOOKS LIKE THE 4X4 WOOD
 POSTS ARE GOING TO BE BURIED IN THE GROUND. PROVIDE
 SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE TYPE OF WOOD THAT IS DESIGNED
 FOR THIS TYPE OF INSTALLATION. NOTE: COORDINATE WITH
 SPECIFICATIONS SHOWN ON THE CONTRACTOR'S CONTRACT. TO
 AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. SEC. R317.1.2 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 5- DESIGN CRITERIA ON PLANS SPECIFY THAT THIS IS A
 "BUILDING CODE LEVEL II ALTERATION". THIS IS INCORRECT.
 THIS IS AN ADDITION (SEC. 507 FBC-EXISTIN BUILDING) .
 SEE THE DESCRIPTION OF LEVEL II ALTERATION ON SEC. 504
 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING AND REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION &
 REMOVE ANY VOIDED SHEETS & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS
 NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER FROM THE ENGINEER
 LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A
 DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET
 OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND
 WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR
 ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
 IN ORDER TO AVOID MULTIPLE SUBMITTALS, PLEASE FEEL FREE
 TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE
 COMMENTS,
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop HIST HISTORICAL
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2020-01-21 Cont ID  
Sent By fmittner Date 2020-01-21 Time 11:40 Rev Time 0.00
Received By fmittner Date 2020-01-21 Time 11:40 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop HIST HISTORICAL
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2019-12-20 Cont ID  
Sent By fmittner Date 2019-12-20 Time 11:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By fmittner Date 2019-12-20 Time 11:53 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop HIST HISTORICAL
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2019-10-23 Cont ID  
Sent By fmittner Date 2019-10-23 Time 15:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By fmittner Date 2019-10-23 Time 15:10 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2020-01-22 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2020-01-22 Time 14:43 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2020-01-13 Time 13:29 Sent To I
Notes
2020-01-21 13:58:33ROUTED TO JGOMEZ
2020-01-14 13:30:06RESUB ROUTED TO HISTORIC INBOX
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2019-12-23 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2019-12-23 Time 16:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2019-12-18 Time 14:30 Sent To I
Notes
2019-12-19 14:30:28RESUB ROUTED TO HISTORIC INBXO
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2019-11-06 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2019-11-06 Time 10:33 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2019-10-18 Time 13:31 Sent To  
Notes
2019-11-05 16:58:49TO JG DESK
  
2019-10-21 13:31:38ROUTED TO HISTORIC INBOX
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2020-01-21 Cont ID  
Sent By fmittner Date 2020-01-21 Time 11:41 Rev Time 0.00
Received By fmittner Date 2020-01-21 Time 11:41 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2019-12-20 Cont ID  
Sent By fmittner Date 2019-12-20 Time 11:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By fmittner Date 2019-12-20 Time 11:53 Sent To B
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2019-10-23 Cont ID  
Sent By fmittner Date 2019-10-23 Time 15:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By fmittner Date 2019-10-23 Time 15:10 Sent To B
Notes
***NONE***


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved