Plan Review Details - Permit 19031079
Plan Review Stops For Permit 19031079
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 7 Status P Date 2021-07-01 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2021-07-01 Time 09:27 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2021-07-01 Time 09:27 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 6 Status F Date 2021-04-14 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2021-04-14 Time 17:19 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2021-04-14 Time 17:19 Sent To  
Notes
2021-04-14 17:19:40PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS
  
 6TH REVIEW: FBC FIFTH EDITION (2014)
 ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 (561) 805-6714
 [email protected]
  
 THE SUBMITTALS HAVE BEEN DENIED BY BUILDING
 PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW:
  
 1) THE CALCULATIONS FROM WILLIAM RAIOLA, P.E. THAT WERE
 SUBMITTED, STATE THAT PER FBC AND ASCE7-10 WIND
 PRESSURES MAY BE INTERPOLATED BETWEEN ZONES. I
 DISCUSSED THIS WITH THE BUILDING OFFICIAL ROBERT BROWN
 AND WE ARE AWARE THAT THE FBC BUILDING (FIGURE 1609A,
 NOTE 2) ALLOWS INTERPOLATION BETWEEN ZONES ON THE WIND
 SPEED MAPS, BUT WE DO NOT KNOW OF ANY PROVISION IN THE
 CODE THAT ALLOWS FOR INTERPOLATION OF THE COMPONENT AND
 CLADDING PRESSURES BETWEEN THE WALL ZONES OF A
 BUILDING. PLEASE PROVIDE THE CODE SECTION FROM THE FBC
 OR THE SECTION FROM ASCE 7-10 THAT SPECIFICALLY ALLOWS
 THE INTERPOLATION OF COMPONENT AND CLADDING PRESSURES.
 WHEN YOU HAVE PROVIDED THE SECTIONS THAT YOU ARE USING
 FOR YOUR INTERPOLATIONS AND CALCULATIONS, WE WILL
 RE-EVALUATE YOUR SUBMITTAL. HOWEVER, BASED ON THE
 SUBMITTAL WE AGREE THAT IF ANY PORTION OF THE WINDOW IS
 LOCATED IN WALL ZONE 5, THEN THE COMPONENT AND CLADDING
 PRESSURES OF ZONE 5 APPLY TO THE WINDOW.
  
 PREVIOUS COMMENTS: [ THE PREVIOUS COMMENTS HAVE NOT
 BEEN RESOLVED. AS STATED IN PREVIOUS COMMENT #1,
 RATIONAL ANALYSIS IS NOT ALLOWED TO BE USED TO INCREASE
 THE MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURES OF A TESTED ASSEMBLY. THE
 WINDOW SYSTEMS HAVE BEEN TESTED AND THEN SAFETY FACTORS
 ARE APPLIED PER FBC 1710.
  
 1) NOT RESOLVED. ALL OF THE PREVIOUS COMMENTS HAVE BEEN
 ADDRESSED WITH ONE EXCEPTION. THE RATIONAL ANALYSIS
 CALCULATIONS THAT WERE SUBMITTED FOR THE 24" X 24" ES
 1500 FIXED WINDOWS IN ZONE 5 ARE INCORRECT. RATIONAL
 ANALYSIS CAN NOT BE USED TO INCREASE THE WIND LOAD
 PRESSURES FOR A TESTED ASSEMBLY. THE NEGATIVE AND
 POSITIVE PRESSURES OF +70, -90 PSF LISTED IN PRODUCT
 APPROVAL ARE BASED ON THE TESTING AND SAFETY FACTORS AS
 REQUIRED BY THE 2014 FBC SECTION 1710.5.
  
 A) THE WIND LOAD PRESSURES ON SHEET S.04 IN THE TABLE
 FOR AN EFFECTIVE WIND AREA LESS THAN 10 SQFT IN WALL
 ZONE 5A IS +90.3 PSF, -165.9 PSF. NOTE #5 STATES THAT
 THE VALUES IN THE TABLE ARE ULTIMATE AND CAN BE
 MULTIPLIED BY 0.6 TO DETERMINE SERVICE LOADS OR ASD.
 AFTER THESE PRESSURES ARE MULTIPLIED BY 0.6, THE
 REQUIRED WINDOW DESIGN PRESSURES ARE +54.3 PSF AND
 -99.54 PSF. SINCE THE MAXIMUM NEGATIVE DESIGN PRESSURE
 FOR THE (2' X 2') FIXED WINDOWS IN NOA NO. 17-1114.10
 IS -90 PSF, THEY DO NOT MEET THE REQUIRED PRESSURE.
  
 B) THE CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON PART OF THE WINDOWS
 BEING LOCATED IN WALL PRESSURES ZONE 4. HOWEVER, IF ANY
 PORTION OF THE WINDOW IS LOCATED IN WALL ZONE 5, THEN
 THE ENTIRE WINDOW IS EVALUATED TO THE GREATER PRESSURES
 OF ZONE 5.
  
 2) WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A
 RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE
 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. ]
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 5 Status F Date 2021-02-03 Cont ID  
Sent By mcdougal Date 2021-02-03 Time 14:52 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2021-02-03 Time 14:52 Sent To  
Notes
2021-02-03 14:51:58PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS
  
 5TH REVIEW: FBC FIFTH EDITION (2014)
 ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 (561) 805-6714
 [email protected]
  
 THE SUBMITTALS HAVE BEEN DENIED BY BUILDING
 PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW:
  
 THE PREVIOUS COMMENTS HAVE NOT BEEN RESOLVED. AS STATED
 IN PREVIOUS COMMENT #1, RATIONAL ANALYSIS IS NOT
 ALLOWED TO BE USED TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM DESIGN
 PRESSURES OF A TESTED ASSEMBLY. THE WINDOW SYSTEMS HAVE
 BEEN TESTED AND THEN SAFETY FACTORS ARE APPLIED PER FBC
 1710.
  
 1) NOT RESOLVED. ALL OF THE PREVIOUS COMMENTS HAVE BEEN
 ADDRESSED WITH ONE EXCEPTION. THE RATIONAL ANALYSIS
 CALCULATIONS THAT WERE SUBMITTED FOR THE 24" X 24" ES
 1500 FIXED WINDOWS IN ZONE 5 ARE INCORRECT. RATIONAL
 ANALYSIS CAN NOT BE USED TO INCREASE THE WIND LOAD
 PRESSURES FOR A TESTED ASSEMBLY. THE NEGATIVE AND
 POSITIVE PRESSURES OF +70, -90 PSF LISTED IN PRODUCT
 APPROVAL ARE BASED ON THE TESTING AND SAFETY FACTORS AS
 REQUIRED BY THE 2014 FBC SECTION 1710.5.
  
 A) THE WIND LOAD PRESSURES ON SHEET S.04 IN THE TABLE
 FOR AN EFFECTIVE WIND AREA LESS THAN 10 SQFT IN WALL
 ZONE 5A IS +90.3 PSF, -165.9 PSF. NOTE #5 STATES THAT
 THE VALUES IN THE TABLE ARE ULTIMATE AND CAN BE
 MULTIPLIED BY 0.6 TO DETERMINE SERVICE LOADS OR ASD.
 AFTER THESE PRESSURES ARE MULTIPLIED BY 0.6, THE
 REQUIRED WINDOW DESIGN PRESSURES ARE +54.3 PSF AND
 -99.54 PSF. SINCE THE MAXIMUM NEGATIVE DESIGN PRESSURE
 FOR THE (2' X 2') FIXED WINDOWS IN NOA NO. 17-1114.10
 IS -90 PSF, THEY DO NOT MEET THE REQUIRED PRESSURE.
  
 B) THE CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON PART OF THE WINDOWS
 BEING LOCATED IN WALL PRESSURES ZONE 4. HOWEVER, IF ANY
 PORTION OF THE WINDOW IS LOCATED IN WALL ZONE 5, THEN
 THE ENTIRE WINDOW IS EVALUATED TO THE GREATER PRESSURES
 OF ZONE 5.
  
 2) WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A
 RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE
 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL FORM.
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2019-10-16 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2019-10-16 Time 08:34 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2019-10-16 Time 07:00 Sent To I
Notes
2019-10-16 08:34:55PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS
  
 4TH REVIEW: FBC FIFTH EDITION (2014)
 ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 (561) 805-6714
 [email protected]
  
 THE SUBMITTALS HAVE BEEN DENIED BY BUILDING
 PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW:
  
 1) ALL OF THE PREVIOUS COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED
 WITH ONE EXCEPTION. THE RATIONAL ANALYSIS CALCULATIONS
 THAT WERE SUBMITTED FOR THE 24" X 24" ES 1500 FIXED
 WINDOWS IN ZONE 5 ARE INCORRECT. RATIONAL ANALYSIS CAN
 NOT BE USED TO INCREASE THE WIND LOAD PRESSURES FOR A
 TESTED ASSEMBLY. THE NEGATIVE AND POSITIVE PRESSURES OF
 +70, -90 PSF LISTED IN PRODUCT APPROVAL ARE BASED ON
 THE TESTING AND SAFETY FACTORS AS REQUIRED BY THE 2014
 FBC SECTION 1710.5.
  
 A) THE ENGINEERING THAT WAS SUBMITTED FOR THE 2' X 2'
 WINDOW LOCATED IN WALL ZONE 4, DOES NOT RESOLVE THE
 ISSUE OF THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR THE WINDOW BEING LESS
 THAN REQUIRED. NOA NO.17-1114.10 FOR THE ES 1500
 WINDOWS LISTS THE MAXIMUM DESIGN LOAD CAPACITY AS +70,
 -90 PSF. THE ENGINEER'S CALCULATIONS APPEAR TO SHOW THE
 REQUIRED PRESSURES AS +90.5 PSF, -150.82 PSF, WHICH
 APPEAR TO BE VULT PRESSURES. HE THEN STATES THE WINDOW
 PRESSURE ALLOWABLE AS 160 PSF IS GREATER THAN 150.82
 PSF. PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW THE 160 PSF WAS DETERMINED.
  
 B) THE ENGINEER'S REPORT HAS A SIGNED AND SEALED COVER
 SHEET, HOWEVER, THE ATTACHED PAGES ARE NOT SIGNED AND
 SEALED. THE PAGES ARE NOT NUMBERED AND IDENTIFIED ON
 THE COVER SHEET OR INDEX SHEET AS REQUIRED BY FAC
 61G15-23.002.
  
 C) THE WALL EXTERNAL PRESSURES ARE LOWER THAN THE ONES
 IN THE COMPONENTS AND CLADDING EXTERNAL PRESSURE LOADS
 IN THE CHART ON PLAN SHEET S0.4. THE PLANS OR THE
 CALCULATIONS WILL NEED TO BE REVISED SO THAT THE
 PRESSURES ARE THE SAME. FBC 107.2.1
  
 3) WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A
 RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE
 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL FORM.
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2019-08-05 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2019-08-05 Time 15:05 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2019-08-02 Time 18:27 Sent To I
Notes
2019-08-05 15:04:55PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS
  
 3RD REVIEW: FBC FIFTH EDITION (2014)
 ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 (561) 805-6714
 [email protected]
  
 THE SUBMITTALS HAVE BEEN DENIED BY BUILDING
 PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW:
  
 1) ALL OF THE PREVIOUS COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED
 WITH ONE EXCEPTION. THE RATIONAL ANALYSIS CALCULATIONS
 THAT WERE SUBMITTED FOR THE 24" X 24" ES 1500 FIXED
 WINDOWS IN ZONE 5 ARE INCORRECT. RATIONAL ANALYSIS CAN
 NOT BE USED TO INCREASE THE WIND LOAD PRESSURES FOR A
 TESTED ASSEMBLY. THE NEGATIVE AND POSITIVE PRESSURES OF
 +70, -80 PSF LISTED IN PRODUCT APPROVAL ARE BASED ON
 THE TESTING AND SAFETY FACTORS AS REQUIRED BY THE 2014
 FBC SECTION 1710.5.
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2019-06-07 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2019-06-07 Time 09:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2019-06-07 Time 09:48 Sent To I
Notes
2019-06-07 10:27:44PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS
  
 2ND REVIEW: FBC FIFTH EDITION (2014)
 ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 (561) 805-6714
 [email protected]
  
 THE SUBMITTALS HAVE BEEN DENIED BY BUILDING
 PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW:
  
 1) NOT ADDRESSED. THE BILCO ROOF HATCH, NOA NO
 18-0226.04, HAS A MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURE OF +/- 70
 PSF. THE ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL ROOF PLANS SHOW
 THAT PART OF THE HATCH IS LOCATED IN ROOF ZONE 2 AND
 THE REST OF IT IS IN ROOF ZONE 1. THE REQUIRED NEGATIVE
 PRESSURE FOR ROOF ZONE 2 IS - 126.9 PSF AND FOR ROOF
 ZONE 1 IS -80.8 PSF , ACCORDING TO THE PRESSURES
 DETERMINED BY THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER ON SHEET S0.4 OF
 THE PLANS. FBC 1609 AND 107.3.4
  
 2) NOT COMPLETELY ADDRESSED. THE NEW WINDOW/SLIDING
 GLASS DOOR AND AC ROOF STAND SUBMITTALS DO NOT HAVE THE
 DESIGNER OF RECORD'S SHOP REVIEW APPROVAL STAMP ON
 THEM. THE DESIGNER OF RECORD FOR THE BUILDING IS
 REQUIRED TO REVIEW AND APPROVE THE PRODUCT APPROVALS
 FOR THE EXTERIOR DOORS AND WINDOWS, AS WELL AS, THE
 SHOP DRAWINGS FROM THE SPECIALTY ENGINEER. FBC 107.3.4
 & 107.3.4.1
  
 3) NOT ADDRESSED. THESE WERE NOT RESUBMITTED. THE
 SPECIALTY ENGINEER WHOSE NAME APPEARS IN THE TITLE
 BLOCK IS REQUIRED TO SIGN, SEAL AND DATE THE WINDOW
 WATERPROOFING DETAILS. 471.025, F.S., AND RULE
 61G15-23.001, F.A.C.
  
 4) COMPLIED.
  
 5) COMPLIED.
  
 6) COMPLIED.
  
 7) COMPLIED.
  
 8) COMPLIED.
  
 9) WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A
 RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE
 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE INSERT
 CORRECTED PLAN SHEETS INTO THE SETS, REMOVE THE
 PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS AND MARK VOID ON THEM, AND
 KEEP THEM WITH THE SUBMITTALS.
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2019-04-03 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2019-04-03 Time 10:18 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2019-04-01 Time 18:52 Sent To I
Notes
2019-04-02 19:04:53PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS
  
 1ST REVIEW: FBC FIFTH EDITION (2014)
 ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 (561) 805-6714
 [email protected]
  
 THE SUBMITTALS HAVE BEEN DENIED BY BUILDING
 PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW:
  
 1) THE BILCO ROOF HATCH, NOA NO 18-0226.04, HAS A
 MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURE OF +/- 70 PSF. THE
 ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL ROOF PLANS SHOW THAT PART
 OF THE HATCH IS LOCATED IN ROOF ZONE 2 AND THE REST OF
 IT IS IN ROOF ZONE 1. THE REQUIRED NEGATIVE PRESSURE
 FOR ROOF ZONE 2 IS - 126.9 PSF AND FOR ROOF ZONE 1 IS
 -80.8 PSF , ACCORDING TO THE PRESSURES DETERMINED BY
 THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER ON SHEET S0.4 OF THE PLANS. FBC
 1609 AND 107.3.4
  
 2) THE DESIGNER OF RECORD FOR THE BUILDING IS REQUIRED
 TO REVIEW AND APPROVE THE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE
 EXTERIOR DOORS AND WINDOWS, AS WELL AS, THE SHOP
 DRAWINGS FROM THE SPECIALTY ENGINEER. FBC 107.3.4 &
 107.3.4.1
  
 3) THE SPECIALTY ENGINEER WHOSE NAME APPEARS IN THE
 TITLE BLOCK IS REQUIRED TO SIGN, SEAL AND DATE THE
 WINDOW WATERPROOFING DETAILS. 471.025, F.S., AND RULE
 61G15-23.001, F.A.C.
  
 4) THERE WAS NO PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED FOR THE 20'
 (240") WIDTH SLIDING GLASS DOOR (SGD) FRAME. THE TWO
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE SUBMITTED HAVE A MAXIMUM FRAME WIDTH
 OF 16' (192"). FBC 107.2.1 & FLORIDA STATUTE 553.842
 (5)
  
 5) PLEASE INDICATE THE SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS, GLASS TYPE,
 DESIGN PRESSURES, ETC. FOR THE WINDOWS AND EXTERIOR
 DOORS THAT WILL BE INSTALLED BY MARKING THE APPROPRIATE
 ITEMS FROM THE CHARTS THAT ARE LOCATED IN THE PRODUCT
 APPROVALS. FBC 107.2.1 AND 1609.
  
 6) NO FL PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER SHEET ASSOCIATED WITH
 THE SGD DRAWING NUMBER W17-41 WAS SUBMITTED. FBC
 107.2.1 & FLORIDA STATUTE 553.842 (5)
  
 7) THE GENERAL NOTES ON PAGE 1 OF THE SHOP DRAWINGS,
 SPECIFY MIAMI-DADE NOA PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBERS FOR THE
 6000 AND 6001 SERIES SGDS AND FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVALS
 WERE SUBMITTED. COORDINATE SUBMITTALS. FBC 107.2.1
  
 8) THE ELEVATION PRESSURES THAT ARE PROVIDED ON SHEET 1
 OF THE WINDOW AND SGD SHOP DRAWINGS ARE UNCLEAR AND ARE
 NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPONENT AND CLADDING
 PRESSURES SPECIFIED BY THE ON SHEET S0.4. EITHER REMOVE
 IT OR REVISE TO MATCH PLANS. FBC 107.2.1 & FBC 1609
  
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 7 Status N Date 2021-07-01 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2021-07-01 Time 09:27 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2021-06-21 Time 06:41 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 6 Status N Date 2021-04-14 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2021-04-14 Time 17:19 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2021-04-13 Time 08:58 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 5 Status N Date 2021-02-03 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2021-02-03 Time 14:52 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2021-01-27 Time 12:11 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2019-10-16 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2019-10-16 Time 08:35 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2019-10-10 Time 14:42 Sent To  
Notes
2019-10-10 14:42:36RESUB ROUTED TO RMCDOUGAL
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2019-08-05 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2019-08-05 Time 15:05 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2019-08-01 Time 14:36 Sent To  
Notes
2019-08-02 14:36:22RESUB ROUTED TO RMCDOUGAL
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2019-06-07 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2019-06-07 Time 10:27 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2019-05-30 Time 13:51 Sent To  
Notes
2019-05-31 13:51:59RESUB ROUTED TO RMCDOUGAL
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2019-04-03 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2019-04-03 Time 10:18 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2019-03-22 Time 15:35 Sent To  
Notes
2019-03-25 15:35:18SUBMITTAL ROUTED TO RMCDOUGAL
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2021-07-01 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2021-07-01 Time 09:27 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2021-07-01 Time 09:27 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2021-01-27 Cont ID  
Sent By medwards Date 2021-01-27 Time 14:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By medwards Date 2021-01-27 Time 14:26 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved