City of West Palm Beach eGovPlus

Plan Review Details - Permit 19020390

Plan Review Stops For Permit 19020390

Review Stop	AD			ADDRESSING
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	2022-09-21			Cont ID
Sent By	cpuell			Date	2022-09-21	Time	08:09	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	cpuell			Date	2022-09-21	Time	08:09	Sent To

Notes

2022-09-21 08:09:30

ADDRESS UPDATED TO 105 @ DATURA ST

Review Stop	AD			ADDRESSING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	2022-01-05			Cont ID
Sent By	cpuell			Date	2022-01-05	Time	12:38	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	cpuell			Date	2022-01-05	Time	12:38	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	ENG			ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	2022-10-25			Cont ID
Sent By	sberglun			Date	2022-10-25	Time	08:36	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	sberglun			Date	2022-10-25	Time	08:36	Sent To

Notes

2022-10-25 08:36:11	1) VERIFY POLE IS 2' MINIMUM FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF
	POLE.
	2) ADDRESS ZONING COMMENTS
	3) UNDERGROUND ROUTING DOES NOT APPEAR TO CONFLICT WITH
	EXISTING CITY FACILITIES.
	SUZANNE BERGLUND
	[email protected]

Review Stop	ENG			ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	2022-06-24			Cont ID
Sent By	sberglun			Date	2022-06-24	Time	08:29	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	sberglun			Date	2022-06-24	Time	08:29	Sent To

Notes

2022-06-24 08:29:12	1) CITY UTILITIES ARE SHOWN INCORRECTLY ON PLANS.
	INCLUDE CITY UNDERGROUND UTILITIY PIPE SIZE, PIPE
	MATERIAL, AND DESCRIPTION ON THE SITE PLAN. CONTACT
	JANICE TARBILL, [email protected] FOR AS-BUILT
	INFORMATION. INCLUDE AS-BUILT INFORMATION IN YOUR
	RESUBMITTAL.
	2) PROFILE PROVIDED DOES NOT ACCURATELY SHOW CITY
	UTILITIES. INCLUDE UTILITY TYPE, PIPE SIZE, PIPE
	MATERIAL AND CROSSIND DATA FOR ALL UTILITIES.
	3) ALL ROADWAY, SIDEWALK, AND SWALE RESTORATIONS ARE
	REQUIRED PER CITY STANDARD.

	SUZANNE BERGLUND
	[email protected]
	561-494-1075

Review Stop	ENG-P			ENGINEERING PLANNING REVIEW
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	2022-06-24			Cont ID
Sent By	gpatrie			Date	2022-06-24	Time	08:28	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	sberglun			Date	2022-06-24	Time	08:28	Sent To

Notes

2022-06-24 08:28:44	1) CITY UTILITIES ARE SHOWN INCORRECTLY ON PLANS.
	INCLUDE CITY UNDERGROUND UTILITIY PIPE SIZE, PIPE
	MATERIAL, AND DESCRIPTION ON THE SITE PLAN. CONTACT
	JANICE TARBILL, [email protected] FOR AS-BUILT
	INFORMATION. INCLUDE AS-BUILT INFORMATION IN YOUR
	RESUBMITTAL.
	2) PROFILE PROVIDED DOES NOT ACCURATELY SHOW CITY
	UTILITIES. INCLUDE UTILITY TYPE, PIPE SIZE, PIPE
	MATERIAL AND CROSSIND DATA FOR ALL UTILITIES.
	3) ALL ROADWAY, SIDEWALK, AND SWALE RESTORATIONS ARE
	REQUIRED PER CITY STANDARD.

	SUZANNE BERGLUND
	[email protected]
	561-494-1075

Review Stop	ENG-P			ENGINEERING PLANNING REVIEW
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	2022-06-24			Cont ID
Sent By	gpatrie			Date	2020-06-08	Time	13:42	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	sberglun			Date	2022-06-24	Time	08:27	Sent To

Notes

2020-06-08 13:43:59	SUBMIT A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT TO THE CITY OF WEST PALM
	BEACH.

	CONTACT: [email protected]

Review Stop	ENG-P			ENGINEERING PLANNING REVIEW
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	2020-06-08			Cont ID
Sent By	rsklarew			Date	2020-06-08	Time	13:51	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rsklarew			Date	2020-06-08	Time	13:51	Sent To

Notes

2020-02-04 07:30:31	LOCATION REVISED, NEW S FLAGLER DR NORTH OF DATURA
	SOUTH OF S CLEMATIS ST.

	1) NEW LOCATION IS ACCEPTABLE.

	2) NEW POLE DESIGN NEEDS COMMISION APPROVAL.

	CONTACT: GORDON PATRIE / [email protected]
2019-02-21 13:02:49	PERMIT 19020390 - INTERSECTION OF TRINITY PLACE & S.
	FLAGLER DRIVE POLE

	PLEASE SEE THE LIST BELOW FOR AN ANALYSIS OF THE
	DEFICIENCIES IN INFORMATION REQUIRED BY SECTION 78-401
	OF THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CODE AS PART OF THE
	COMMUNICATION FACILITIES PLACEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION.
	THE DEFICIENT INFORMATION MUST BE PROVIDED FOR STAFF TO
	REVIEW THE PERMIT APPLICATION. PLEASE NOTE THAT STAFF
	HAS ALSO INCLUDED SOME SUBSTANTIVE REVIEW COMMENTS,
	THAT WHILE NOT RESULTING IN A DEFICIENT APPLICATION,
	NEED TO BE ADDRESSED OR THE PERMIT WILL NOT BE
	APPROVED.

	1) ENGINEERING PLANS - THE ENGINEERING PLANS WERE
	SUBMITTED AT A 1/16TH = 1 FOOT SCALE, WHICH DOES NOT
	COMPLY WITH THE CITY CODE SCALE REQUIREMENT OF 10FT,
	20FT, OR 40FT SCALE. PROVIDE THE PLANS AT THE REQUIRED
	SCALE.

	A) SHOW DIMENSIONS ON SH C4.

	B) SH E4 GROUND ROD DETAIL DIMENSION "A" NOT SHOWN

	C) PROPOSED POLE DOES NOT SHOW ORIENTATION TO ROADWAY.

	D) IRRIGATION LINES NOT SHOW ON DRAWINGS.

	E) ALL RESTORATION TO CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY PER CITY
	STANDARD DETAILS.

	F) HAND HOLDS NOT LOCATED.

	F) ALL ROADWAY CUTS REQUIRE A MINIUM OF 25FT EITHER
	SIDE OF TRENCH FULL LANE WIDTH.

	2) SURVEY OF UNDERGROUND FACILITIES - THE BASE OF THE
	POLE IS BEING INSTALLED UNDERGROUND SO THIS IS
	REQUIRED. ALL SURVEYS TO BE SHOWN OVER AERIAL.

	A. ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES NEED TO BE PROVIDED ON THE
	SURVEY. THE PROVIDED SURVEY SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT NO
	UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATES WERE DONE, WHICH DOES NOT
	COMPLY WITH THE CITY CODE REQUIREMENTS.

	B. THE ENGINEERING PLAN MUST BE BASED OFF OF THIS
	SURVEY INFORMATION.

	3) SURVEY OF ABOVEGROUND FACILITIES - A NEW POLE IS
	BEING INSTALLED ABOVEGROUND SO THIS IS REQUIRED.

	A. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE SURVEY DOES NOT PROVIDE THE
	SIZE OF THE EXISTING UTILITY POLE BASE DIAMETER, WHICH
	WILL NEED TO BE CORRECTED ON THE REVISED SURVEY.

	B. IDENTIFY ALL ABOVEGROUND COMMUNICATION FACILITIES IN
	THE AREA TO INCLUDE AN INVENTORY OF THE REGISTRANT'S
	EXISTING FACILITIES - NO INFORMATION ON EXISTING
	FACILITIES WAS PROVIDED. SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON THE
	PLANS AND PROVIDE A NARRATIVE. IF THERE ARE NO
	FACILITIES, THIS SHALL BE NOTED ON THE SURVEY.

	4) CONCEALMENT METHODS DESCRIPTIONS - NO CONCEALMENT
	INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PROPOSED
	SUPPORT POLE DOES NOT MEET THE CITY CONCEALMENT
	STANDARDS OUTLINED IN SECTION 78-411 OF THE CITY CODE.
	PROVIDE PLANS AND NARRATIVE ON HOW THE INSTALLATION
	COMPLIES WITH THE CITY'S CONCEALMENT REQUIREMENT.

	5) RESTORATION ESTIMATE - YOU MUST PROVIDE A
	RESTORATION ESTIMATE FOR THE SPECIFIC LOCATION OF THE
	POLE, NOT A GENERIC ESTIMATE THAT IS NOT LINKED TO THE
	SPECIFIC LOCATION AND WORK TO BE DONE.

	6) RADIO FREQUENCY INTERFERENCE - NO INFORMATION WAS
	PROVIDED THAT THE PROPOSED FACILITIES WILL NOT CAUSE
	RADIO FREQUENCY INTERFERENCE WITH THE CITY'S PUBLIC
	SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT. PROVIDE A STATEMENT
	REGARDING RADIO FREQUENCY INTERFERENCE.

	7) EVIDENCE OF INSURANCE COVERAGE

	A. THE CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE LISTS ONLY
	THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AS THE ADDITIONAL INSURED.
	THE CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE NEEDS TO BE
	REVISED TO NAME THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, ITS
	COMMISSIONERS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS AS
	ADDITIONAL INSURED.

	B. THE CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE STATES THAT
	THE INSTALLATION IS IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY. THE WORK IS
	ACTUALLY WITHIN WEST PALM BEACH AND THE CERTIFICATE OF
	LIABILITY INSURANCE NEEDS TO BE CHANGED TO REFLECT
	THIS.

	8) START OF OPERATION - AN ATTESTATION FROM THE
	COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES SERVICE PROVIDER THAT
	COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES FACILITIES WILL BE INSTALLED
	AND OPERATIONAL ON THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE NO LATER THAN
	NINE MONTHS AFTER THE DATE THE APPLICATION IS APPROVED
	IS REQUIRED. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED ATTESTATION.

	9) PUBLIC UTILITY LETTERS, TELEPHONE, NATURAL GAS,
	ELECTRIC SERVICE, AND TELEVISION CABLE - THE PUBLIC
	UTILITY LETTERS WERE NOT PROVIDED. WHILE IMPORTANT, THE
	811 RESPONSE FORM DOES NOT ADDRESS THIS COMMENT.
	PROVIDE COPIES OF THE PUBLIC UTILITY LETTERS.

	10) ELECTRONIC FORMAT OF SUBMITTAL - THE SUBMITTAL WAS
	NOT PROVIDED IN ELECTRONIC FORM. A COPY OF ALL OF THE
	SUBMITTAL MATERIAL MUST BE SUBMITTED IN ELECTRONIC
	FORMAT.

	11) PROOF OF MAILING NOTICE TO OWNERS, ONE COPY OF
	ADDRESS LIST OF PROPERTY OWNER'S ADDRESSES WITHIN 250
	FEET AND ONE COPY OF RADIUS MAP PROVIDED BY THE PAPA
	SHOWING THOSE PROPERTIES WITHIN 250 FEET OF AFFECTED
	RIGHTS-OF-WAY - A COPY OF THE RADIUS MAP WAS NOT
	SUBMITTED. THE OWNER'S ADDRESS LIST, WHILE SUBMITTED IS
	SUCH A SMALL FONT THAT IT IS NOT EASILY READABLE.
	PLEASE PROVIDE THE RADIUS MAP FROM PAPA AND THE ADDRESS
	LIST AT A BIGGER, READABLE FONT.

	12) PUBLIC NOTICE MAILER AFFIDAVIT - THE AFFIDAVIT WAS
	PROVIDED, BUT NOTHING TO SHOW WHAT WAS MAILED OUT WAS
	PROVIDED. PLEASE CLARIFY AND PROVIDE THE INFORMATION.

	CONTACT GORDON PATRIE @ (561) 494-1082
	[email protected]

Review Stop	I			INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No	2	Status	N	Date	2022-10-26			Cont ID
Sent By	aoliver			Date	2022-10-26	Time	08:12	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	aoliver			Date	2022-09-06	Time	07:59	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	I			INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No	1	Status	N	Date	2022-06-27			Cont ID
Sent By	lmarchan			Date	2022-06-27	Time	08:44	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	lmarchan			Date	2021-11-03	Time	14:40	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	5	Status	F	Date	2022-09-29			Cont ID
Sent By	ckimmerl			Date	2022-09-29	Time	11:42	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	ckimmerl			Date	2022-09-29	Time	11:41	Sent To

Notes

2022-09-29 11:42:08	1. PLEASE PROVIDE SURVEY FOR ENTIRE SCOPE OF PROJECT,
	POLE LOCATION, AND INCLUDING THE POWER ROUTE. APPEARS
	POWER IS BEING PULLED FROM A TRANSFORMER WITHIN
	PRIVATE/CITY PROPERTY, PLEASE PROVIDE PROOF OF
	UTILITY/ACCESS EASEMENT ON THE SURVEY OR PROVIDE
	OWNER???S CONSENT. OTHERWISE POLE WILL HAVE TO DRAW
	POWER FROM AN ALTERNATIVE LOCATION.

	2. THE POLE STEALTH DESIGN AND COLOR MEETS CITY
	STANDARDS.

	CHRIS KIMMERLY, AICP
	URBAN DESIGN PLANNER
	(561)822-1426 [email protected]

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	4	Status	F	Date	2021-12-06			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	2021-12-06	Time	14:38	Rev Time	0.50
Received By	eschneid			Date	2021-12-06	Time	14:38	Sent To

Notes

2021-12-06 14:39:37	FAILED

	1) THE SURVEY PROVIDED WITH THE APPLICATION DOES NOT
	COVER THE ENTIRE SCOPE OF WORK, SPECIFICALLY THE SOUTH
	WEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF EVERNIA STREET AND
	FLAGLER DRIVE. THIS SECTION OF THE INTERSECTION CALLS
	OUT A PROPOSED BORE PIT AND HANDHOLE FOR THE
	UNDERGROUND POWER. THE SURVEY NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED SO
	THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THE INSTALLATIONS ARE FULLY
	WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND NOT ON PRIVATE PROPERTY.

	2) THE POLE NEEDS TO BE IN LINE WITH PALM TREES ALONG
	DATURA STREET. PLEASE NOTE THE OUTSIDE EDGE OF THE POLE
	MUST BE SETBACK A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES FROM THE CURB.

	3) PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS FROM THE EDGE OF THE
	EXCAVATION PIT FOR THE PROPOSED HANDHOLE WITHIN THE
	FLAGLER DRIVE RIGHT-OF-WAY, GENERALLY MIDWAY BETWEEN
	DATURA AND EVERNIA STREETS, TO THE TRUNK OF THE
	ADJACENT PALM TREES. THIS DIMENSION SHALL BE NO LESS
	THAN 5 FEET.

	4) THE PLANS MUST CLEARLY CALL OUT THAT THE BORE, AND
	THUS THE BORE EQUIPMENT STAGING, IS DONE FROM THE BORE
	PITS ALONG FLAGLER DRIVE. THE BORE EQUIPMENT MAY NOT BE
	STAGED ADJACENT TO A PALM TREE (AT THE POLE OR AT THE
	HANDHOLE) SO AS NOT TO DAMAGE THE TREES.

	5) THE POLE DESIGN AND THE UNDERGROUND FIBER PATH/DEPTH
	COMPLY WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS.

	6) THE POLE COLOR SHALL BE GREY TO MATCH THE DECORATIVE
	LIGHT POLES ALONG DATURA STREET.

	CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
	[email protected]

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	2020-08-06			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	2020-08-06	Time	15:19	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	eschneid			Date	2020-07-28	Time	14:10	Sent To

Notes

2020-08-06 15:26:56	PERMIT 19020390 - WEST PALM BEACH NODE 2 SITE #15034001
	INTERSECTION S. FLAGLER DRIVE AND DATURA ST. - 3RD
	REVIEW

	FAILED

	THE CITY HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSED POLE LOCATION AND
	HAS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

	1) THE SURVEY PROVIDED WITH THE APPLICATION FAILS TO
	SHOW THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE. THE ENGINEERING PLAN BASED
	ON THE SURVEY SHOWS THE PROPERTY LINE AT THE BACK OF
	THE SIDEWALK; HOWEVER, THIS IS NOT ACCURATE. THE
	RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE IS CLOSER TO THE CURB. THIS LOCATION
	IS VERIFIED BY THE SURVEYS PROVIDED BY MCIMETRO FOR THE
	FIBER BORES ON VERIZON'S BEHALF. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE
	MCIMETRO PROVIDED SURVEYS WERE NOT SPECIFICALLY DONE TO
	VERIFY THAT THE PROPOSED POLE LOCATION IS INDEED WITHIN
	THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, SO IT IS NOT CONCLUSIVE. IN THE
	ABSENCE OF YOUR TEAM PROVIDING A SURVEY, WHICH CLEARLY
	SHOWS THE POLE LOCATION WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, THIS
	LOCATION WILL NOT BE APPROVED. YOU MUST PROVIDE A
	SURVEY SHOWING THE ACCURATE LOCATION OF THE
	RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE CURB, THE TREE WILL AND OTHER
	FEATURES.

	2) THE ENGINEERING PLAN AND THE SURVEY SHOW THE
	PROPOSED POLE LOCATE ADJACENT TO AN EXISTING TREE WELL
	WHICH NOW ONLY CONTAINS THE PALM TREE STUMP. THE CITY
	HAS DETERMINED THAT THE INSTALLATION OF THE POLE WITHIN
	THE CENTER, INSTEAD OF ADJACENT TO, IS THE APPROPRIATE
	LOCATION FOR THE NEW POLE. IT WOULD BE IN LINE WITH THE
	EXISTING PALM TREES ON DATURA STREET AND NOT CREATE AN
	ADDITIONAL OBSTRUCTION OF THE SIDEWALK. THIS OF COURSE
	IS SUBJECT TO THE TREE WELL BEING SHOWN WITHIN THE
	RIGHT-OF-WAY BY YOUR UPDATED SURVEY. ANY PULL BOXES,
	HANDHOLES, ETC. WOULD ALSO NEED TO BE CLEARLY SHOWN
	WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. YOU MUST PROVIDE AN UPDATED
	ENGINEERING PLAN SHOWING THE POLE IN THE TREE WELL.

	3) SINCE NEITHER THE SURVEY NOR THE ENGINEERING PLAN
	SHOW UTILITY LINES ADJACENT TO THE TREE WELL, YOU DO
	NOT NEED TO PROVIDE UTILITY PROVIDER LETTERS FOR THIS
	LOCATION.

	4) AS PART OF THE INSTALLATION WITHIN THE TREE WELL,
	YOU WILL BE REQUIRED TO EXCAVATE THE ROOT BALL AND ANY
	MATERIAL WITHIN THE TREE WELL AND INSTALL PAVERS TO
	MATCH THE EXISTING PAVERS TO FILL IN THE AREA BETWEEN
	THE PROPOSED POLE BASE AND THE EXISTING PAVERS. AS PART
	OF THE EVENTUAL RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT YOU WILL NEED TO
	HAVE A RESTORATION PLAN THAT INCLUDES THE INSTALLATION
	OF THE PAVERS

	OTHER THAN THE COMMENTS LISTED ABOVE, STAFF IS READY TO
	APPROVE YOUR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY PERMIT.

	CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
	[email protected]

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	2020-02-13			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	2020-02-13	Time	14:43	Rev Time	1.00
Received By	eschneid			Date	2020-02-13	Time	14:43	Sent To

Notes

2020-02-13 14:44:31	INCOMPLETE APPLICATION

	PERMIT 19020390 - WEST PALM BEACH NODE 2 SITE #15034001
	INTERSECTION S. FLAGLER DRIVE AND S. CLEMATIS - 2ND
	REVIEW

	REPEAT COMMENT: IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTIONS 78-402(B)
	AND 78-411(B)(4) OF THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CODE OF
	ORDINANCES, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH IS REQUESTING
	THAT THIS PROPOSED SMALL WIRELESS FACILITY BE MOVED TO
	ANOTHER LOCATION IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND PLACED ON AN
	ALTERNATIVE UTILITY POLE OR ON A NEW UTILITY POLE TO BE
	INSTALLED WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. WHILE STAFF
	APPRECIATES THE REMOVAL OF THE POLE FROM THE FLAGLER
	DRIVE MEDIAN, VERIZON DID NOT CONTACT STAFF REGARDING
	ALTERNATIVE LOCATIONS PRIOR TO RESUBMITTING THE
	APPLICATION.

	PLEASE SEE THE LIST BELOW FOR AN ANALYSIS OF THE
	DEFICIENCIES IN INFORMATION REQUIRED BY SECTION 78-401
	OF THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CODE AS PART OF THE
	COMMUNICATION FACILITIES PLACEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION.
	THE DEFICIENT INFORMATION MUST BE PROVIDED FOR STAFF TO
	REVIEW THE PERMIT APPLICATION. PLEASE NOTE THAT STAFF
	HAS ALSO INCLUDED SOME SUBSTANTIVE REVIEW COMMENTS,
	THAT WHILE NOT RESULTING IN A DEFICIENT APPLICATION,
	NEED TO BE ADDRESSED OR THE PERMIT WILL NOT BE
	APPROVED.

	1) UPDATED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING A SURVEY
	PREPARED BY A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR. THE SURVEY
	PROVIDES THE REQUIRED INFORMATION EXCEPT IF FAILS TO
	SHOW THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, SO STAFF IS UNABLE FOR
	VERIFY THAT THE PROPOSED POLE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE
	RIGHT-OF-WAY OR ON PRIVATE (CITY OWNED) PROPERTY. A
	COMPARISON WITH CITY RECORDS INDICATES THAT THE POLE
	MAY OR MAY NOT BE ON CITY PROPERTY; HOWEVER, IF THE
	PROPOSED PULL-BOXES ARE CLEARLY ON THE CITY OWNED
	PROPERTY. THESE ITEMS MAY NOT BE LOCATED ON CITY
	PROPERTY WITHOUT CITY APPROVAL AND POSSIBLY A LEASE
	AMENDMENT. THE APPLICATION IS NOT COMPLETE WITHOUT THE
	RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE SHOWN ON THE SURVEY

	2) REPEAT COMMENT: CONCEALMENT METHODS DESCRIPTIONS -
	THE PROPOSED SUPPORT POLE DOES NOT MEET THE CITY
	CONCEALMENT STANDARDS OUTLINED IN SECTION 78-411(F)(1)
	OF THE CITY CODE. THE POLE DESIGN DOES NOT COMPLY WITH
	THE REQUIREMENTS THAT THE POLE BE COMPARABLE IN STYLE
	AND CONFIGURATION TO EXISTING STREETLIGHT FIXTURES AND
	THAT ANY WIRELESS FACILITY EQUIPMENT MUST BE CONCEALED
	WITHIN THE POLE STRUCTURE.

	3) UPDATED COMMENT: PUBLIC UTILITY LETTERS ELECTRIC
	SERVICE, AND TELEVISION CABLE ? THE SURVEY PROVIDED
	WITH THE APPLICATION SHOWS COMCAST AND FPL FACILITIES
	WITHIN FIVE FEET OF THE PROPOSED POLE EMBEDMENT. IN
	ORDER TO VERIFY THAT THE INSTALLATION WILL NOT
	INTERFERE WITH THE EXISTING FACILITIES, PROVIDE COPIES
	OF THE PUBLIC UTILITY LETTERS FROM COMCAST AND FPL.
	PLEASE NOTE, IF THE POLE IS INSTALLED IN A DIFFERENT
	LOCATION BASED ON THE RELOCATION REQUEST THAT IS NOT
	LOCATED NEAR EXISTING UTILITY PROVIDERS, THEN THIS WILL
	NO LONGER BE REQUIRED.

	CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
	[email protected]

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	2019-02-20			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	2019-02-20	Time	17:48	Rev Time	0.50
Received By	eschneid			Date	2019-02-20	Time	17:48	Sent To

Notes

2019-02-20 17:48:51	PERMIT 19020390 - FLAGLER DRIVE MEDIAN, NORTH OF DATURA
	STREET POLE

	IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTIONS 78-402(B) AND 78-411(B)(4)
	OF THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CODE OF ORDINANCES, THE
	CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH IS REQUESTING THAT THIS
	PROPOSED SMALL WIRELESS FACILITY BE MOVED TO ANOTHER
	LOCATION IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND PLACED ON AN
	ALTERNATIVE UTILITY POLE OR ON A NEW UTILITY POLE TO BE
	INSTALLED WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.

	PLEASE SEE THE LIST BELOW FOR AN ANALYSIS OF THE
	DEFICIENCIES IN INFORMATION REQUIRED BY SECTION 78-401
	OF THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CODE AS PART OF THE
	COMMUNICATION FACILITIES PLACEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION.
	THE DEFICIENT INFORMATION MUST BE PROVIDED FOR STAFF TO
	REVIEW THE PERMIT APPLICATION. PLEASE NOTE THAT STAFF
	HAS ALSO INCLUDED SOME SUBSTANTIVE REVIEW COMMENTS,
	THAT WHILE NOT RESULTING IN A DEFICIENT APPLICATION,
	NEED TO BE ADDRESSED OR THE PERMIT WILL NOT BE
	APPROVED.

	1) ENGINEERING PLANS - THE ENGINEERING PLANS WERE
	SUBMITTED AT A 1/16TH = 1 FOOT SCALE, WHICH DOES NOT
	COMPLY WITH THE CITY CODE SCALE REQUIREMENT OF 10FT,
	20FT, OR 40FT SCALE. PROVIDE THE PLANS AT THE REQUIRED
	SCALE.

	2) SURVEY OF UNDERGROUND FACILITIES - THE BASE OF THE
	POLE IS BEING INSTALLED UNDERGROUND SO THIS IS
	REQUIRED.

	A. ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES NEED TO BE PROVIDED ON THE
	SURVEY. THE PROVIDED SURVEY SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT NO
	UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATES WERE DONE, WHICH DOES NOT
	COMPLY WITH THE CITY CODE REQUIREMENTS.

	B. THE ENGINEERING PLAN MUST BE BASED OFF OF THIS
	SURVEY INFORMATION.

	3) SURVEY OF ABOVEGROUND FACILITIES - A NEW POLE IS
	BEING INSTALLED ABOVEGROUND SO THIS IS REQUIRED.

	A. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE SURVEY DOES NOT PROVIDE THE
	SIZE OF THE EXISTING UTILITY POLE BASE DIAMETER, WHICH
	WILL NEED TO BE CORRECTED ON THE REVISED SURVEY.

	B. IDENTIFY ALL ABOVEGROUND COMMUNICATION FACILITIES IN
	THE AREA TO INCLUDE AN INVENTORY OF THE REGISTRANT'S
	EXISTING FACILITIES - NO INFORMATION ON EXISTING
	FACILITIES WAS PROVIDED. SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON THE
	PLANS AND PROVIDE A NARRATIVE. IF THERE ARE NO
	FACILITIES, THIS SHALL BE NOTED ON THE SURVEY.

	4) CONCEALMENT METHODS DESCRIPTIONS - NO CONCEALMENT
	INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PROPOSED
	SUPPORT POLE DOES NOT MEET THE CITY CONCEALMENT
	STANDARDS OUTLINED IN SECTION 78-411 OF THE CITY CODE.
	PROVIDE PLANS AND NARRATIVE ON HOW THE INSTALLATION
	COMPLIES WITH THE CITY'S CONCEALMENT REQUIREMENT.

	5) RESTORATION ESTIMATE - YOU MUST PROVIDE A
	RESTORATION ESTIMATE FOR THE SPECIFIC LOCATION OF THE
	POLE, NOT A GENERIC ESTIMATE THAT IS NOT LINKED TO THE
	SPECIFIC LOCATION AND WORK TO BE DONE.

	6) RADIO FREQUENCY INTERFERENCE - NO INFORMATION WAS
	PROVIDED THAT THE PROPOSED FACILITIES WILL NOT CAUSE
	RADIO FREQUENCY INTERFERENCE WITH THE CITY'S PUBLIC
	SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT. PROVIDE A STATEMENT
	REGARDING RADIO FREQUENCY INTERFERENCE.

	7) EVIDENCE OF INSURANCE COVERAGE

	A. THE CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE LISTS ONLY
	THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AS THE ADDITIONAL INSURED.
	THE CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE NEEDS TO BE
	REVISED TO NAME THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, ITS
	COMMISSIONERS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS AS
	ADDITIONAL INSURED.

	B. THE CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE STATES THAT
	THE INSTALLATION IS IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY. THE WORK IS
	ACTUALLY WITHIN WEST PALM BEACH AND THE CERTIFICATE OF
	LIABILITY INSURANCE NEEDS TO BE CHANGED TO REFLECT
	THIS.

	8) START OF OPERATION - AN ATTESTATION FROM THE
	COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES SERVICE PROVIDER THAT
	COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES FACILITIES WILL BE INSTALLED
	AND OPERATIONAL ON THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE NO LATER THAN
	NINE MONTHS AFTER THE DATE THE APPLICATION IS APPROVED
	IS REQUIRED. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED ATTESTATION.

	9) PUBLIC UTILITY LETTERS, TELEPHONE, NATURAL GAS,
	ELECTRIC SERVICE, AND TELEVISION CABLE - THE PUBLIC
	UTILITY LETTERS WERE NOT PROVIDED. WHILE IMPORTANT, THE
	811 RESPONSE FORM DOES NOT ADDRESS THIS COMMENT.
	PROVIDE COPIES OF THE PUBLIC UTILITY LETTERS.

	10) ELECTRONIC FORMAT OF SUBMITTAL - THE SUBMITTAL WAS
	NOT PROVIDED IN ELECTRONIC FORM. A COPY OF ALL OF THE
	SUBMITTAL MATERIAL MUST BE SUBMITTED IN ELECTRONIC
	FORMAT.

	11) PROOF OF MAILING NOTICE TO OWNERS, ONE COPY OF
	ADDRESS LIST OF PROPERTY OWNER'S ADDRESSES WITHIN 250
	FEET AND ONE COPY OF RADIUS MAP PROVIDED BY THE PAPA
	SHOWING THOSE PROPERTIES WITHIN 250 FEET OF AFFECTED
	RIGHTS-OF-WAY ? A COPY OF THE RADIUS MAP WAS NOT
	SUBMITTED. THE OWNER?S ADDRESS LIST, WHILE SUBMITTED IS
	SUCH A SMALL FONT THAT IT IS NOT EASILY READABLE.
	PLEASE PROVIDE THE RADIUS MAP FROM PAPA AND THE ADDRESS
	LIST AT A BIGGER, READABLE FONT.

	CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
	[email protected]