Plan Review Details - Permit 19020386
Plan Review Stops For Permit 19020386
Review Stop AD ADDRESSING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2022-03-17 Cont ID  
Sent By cpuell Date 2022-03-17 Time 10:03 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cpuell Date 2022-03-17 Time 10:03 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2022-06-24 Cont ID  
Sent By sberglun Date 2022-06-24 Time 09:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By sberglun Date 2022-06-24 Time 09:09 Sent To  
Notes
2022-06-24 09:10:381) CITY UTILITIES ARE SHOWN INCORRECTLY ON PLANS.
 INCLUDE CITY UNDERGROUND UTILITIY PIPE SIZE, PIPE
 MATERIAL, AND DESCRIPTION ON THE SITE PLAN. CONTACT
 JANICE TARBILL, [email protected] FOR AS-BUILT
 INFORMATION. INCLUDE AS-BUILT INFORMATION IN YOUR
 RESUBMITTAL.
 2) PROFILE PROVIDED DOES NOT ACCURATELY SHOW CITY
 UTILITIES. INCLUDE UTILITY TYPE, PIPE SIZE, PIPE
 MATERIAL AND CROSSIND DATA FOR ALL UTILITIES.
 3) ALL ROADWAY, SIDEWALK, AND SWALE RESTORATIONS ARE
 REQUIRED PER CITY STANDARD.
  
 SUZANNE BERGLUND
 [email protected]
 561-494-1075
  
Review Stop ENG - APP2 ENGINEERING APP. REVIEW TELCOM
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2022-03-30 Cont ID  
Sent By gpatrie Date 2022-03-30 Time 10:35 Rev Time 0.00
Received By gpatrie Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-03-30 10:34:56THIS AREA WAS RECENTLY STREET SCAPED. RESUBMIT WITH
 LATEST DRAWINGS OVER AERIAL
 WITH CITY UTILITIES SHOWN. CONTACT [email protected] FOR
 UTILITY DRAWINGS.
  
 CONTACT: [email protected]
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2022-06-27 Cont ID  
Sent By lmarchan Date 2022-06-27 Time 08:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmarchan Date 2021-12-13 Time 13:48 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2022-03-15 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2022-03-15 Time 08:37 Rev Time 0.50
Received By eschneid Date 2022-03-14 Time 16:39 Sent To  
Notes
2022-03-15 08:41:21INSUFFICIENT
  
 1) WHEN THIS LOCATION WAS ORIGINALLY SUBMITTED TO THE
 CITY IN 2019, STAFF PROVIDED THE FOLLOWING COMMENT, "IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH SECTIONS 78-402(B) AND 78-411(B)(4) OF
 THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CODE OF ORDINANCES, THE
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH IS REQUESTING THAT THIS
 PROPOSED SMALL WIRELESS FACILITY BE MOVED TO ANOTHER
 LOCATION IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND PLACED ON AN
 ALTERNATIVE UTILITY POLE OR ON A NEW UTILITY POLE TO BE
 INSTALLED WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY." THERE WAS NO
 DISCUSSION REGARDING AN ALTERNATIVE LOCATION. STAFF HAS
 BEEN IN DISCUSSION WITH THE RELATED COMPANY, DEVELOPER
 OF THE ADJOINING PROPERTIES, SINCE THIS LOCATION WAS
 ORIGINALLY PROPOSED. THEY WOULD LIKE TO BE INVOLVED IN
 THE ALTERNATIVE SITING LOCATION SO THAT THE PROPOSED
 POLE LOCATION DOES NOT CONFLICT WITH THE REDEVELOPMENT
 OF ROSEMARY SQUARE. PLEASE REACH OUT TO DAVID HARRISON
 AT THE CONTACT BELOW TO BEGIN DISCUSSIONS.
  
 DAVID HARRISON
 VICE PRESIDENT
 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
  
 RELATED COMPANIES
 501 FERN STREET, SUITE 105
 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401
 (561) 570-3352 OFFICE
  
 2) THE SURVEY AND ENGINEERING PLAN PROVIDED WITH THE
 APPLICATION INCORRECTLY SHOW THE SIDEWALK WIDTH AND
 THUS TRAVEL LANE CURB. STAFF HAS SURVEYS FROM WHEN
 RELATED RECONSTRUCTED HIBISCUS STREET WHICH SHOW THE
 SIDEWALK AT APPROXIMATELY 15 FEET IN WIDTH. THE
 PROPOSED POLE LOCATION AT 8.75 IS IN THE VALET DROP OFF
 AREA.
  
 3) THE SURVEY CALLS OUT INCORRECT OWNERSHIP INFORMATION
 IN THE AREA AND STATES THE PROPOSED POLE HEIGHT AT ZERO
 FEET. THE SURVEY NEEDS TO SHOW ACCURATE INFORMATION.
  
 4) THE EXISTING DECORATIVE LIGHT SHOWN ON THE SURVEY IS
 17 FEET TALL (CITY CODE REQUIREMENT FOR HIBISCUS
 STREET). THE OVERALL FACILITY HEIGHT IS 24 FEET IN
 HEIGHT, WHICH EXCEEDS THE ALLOWANCE LISTED IN SECTION
 94-411(G)(1) OF THE CITY CODE.
  
 5) PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION OF THE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC
 WHICH VERIFIES THAT THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS WITH
 EXISTING UTILITIES.
  
 6) THE POLE STYLE MEETS CITY REQUIREMENTS. THE POLE
 COLOR IN THIS AREA SHALL BE RAL/RAYCAP 7022 UMBRA GREY.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2019-02-20 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2019-02-20 Time 18:27 Rev Time 0.50
Received By eschneid Date 2019-02-20 Time 18:27 Sent To  
Notes
2019-02-20 18:27:33PERMIT 19020386 - INTERSECTION OF S. ROSEMARY AVENUE &
 HIBISCUS STREET POLE
  
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTIONS 78-402(B) AND 78-411(B)(4)
 OF THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CODE OF ORDINANCES, THE
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH IS REQUESTING THAT THIS
 PROPOSED SMALL WIRELESS FACILITY BE MOVED TO ANOTHER
 LOCATION IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND PLACED ON AN
 ALTERNATIVE UTILITY POLE OR ON A NEW UTILITY POLE TO BE
 INSTALLED WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 PLEASE SEE THE LIST BELOW FOR AN ANALYSIS OF THE
 DEFICIENCIES IN INFORMATION REQUIRED BY SECTION 78-401
 OF THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CODE AS PART OF THE
 COMMUNICATION FACILITIES PLACEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION.
 THE DEFICIENT INFORMATION MUST BE PROVIDED FOR STAFF TO
 REVIEW THE PERMIT APPLICATION. PLEASE NOTE THAT STAFF
 HAS ALSO INCLUDED SOME SUBSTANTIVE REVIEW COMMENTS,
 THAT WHILE NOT RESULTING IN A DEFICIENT APPLICATION,
 NEED TO BE ADDRESSED OR THE PERMIT WILL NOT BE
 APPROVED.
  
 1) ENGINEERING PLANS
  
 A. THE ENGINEERING PLANS WERE SUBMITTED AT A 1/16TH = 1
 FOOT SCALE, WHICH DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE CITY CODE
 SCALE REQUIREMENT OF 10FT, 20FT, OR 40FT SCALE. PROVIDE
 THE PLANS AT THE REQUIRED SCALE.
  
 B. THE 500 BLOCK OF HIBISCUS STREET IS CURRENTLY BEING
 RECONSTRUCTED. THE ENGINEERING PLANS THAT YOU SUBMITTED
 DO NOT SHOW THE FINAL RECONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS AND
 THUS DO NOT ACCURATELY SHOW THE PLACEMENT LOCATION FOR
 THE PROPOSED FACILITIES. PROVIDE ACCURATE PLANS BASED
 ON THE FINAL RECONSTRUCTION OF THE HIBISCUS STREET
 RIGHT-OF-WAY. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PROPOSED POLE
 LOCATION IS IN FUTURE VALET DROP OFF DRIVEWAY.
  
 2) SURVEY OF UNDERGROUND FACILITIES - THE BASE OF THE
 POLE IS BEING INSTALLED UNDERGROUND SO THIS IS
 REQUIRED.
  
 A. AS PREVIOUSLY STATED, HIBISCUS STREET IS BEING
 RECONSTRUCTED, INCLUDING UNDERGROUND UTILITY WORK. ONCE
 THE RECONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED, PROVIDE A SURVEY
 SHOWING ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND FEATURES WITH THE
 PROPOSED POLE NOT INTERFERING WITH UNDERGROUND
 FACILITIES.
  
 B. THE ENGINEERING PLANS MUST BE BASED OFF OF THIS
 SURVEY INFORMATION.
  
 3) SURVEY OF ABOVEGROUND FACILITIES - A NEW POLE IS
 BEING INSTALLED ABOVEGROUND SO THIS IS REQUIRED.
  
 A. AS PREVIOUSLY STATED, HIBISCUS STREET IS BEING
 RECONSTRUCTED. ONCE THE RECONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED,
 PROVIDE A SURVEY SHOWING ALL ABOVEGROUND FEATURES,
 INCLUDING LANDSCAPE WITH THE PROPOSED POLE NOT
 INTERFERING WITH ABOVE GROUND FACULTIES, INCLUDING
 LANDSCAPE.
  
 B. THE ENGINEERING PLANS MUST BE BASED OFF OF THIS
 SURVEY INFORMATION.
  
 C. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE SURVEY DOES NOT PROVIDE THE
 SIZE OF THE EXISTING UTILITY POLE BASE DIAMETER, WHICH
 WILL NEED TO BE CORRECTED ON THE REVISED SURVEY.
  
 D. IDENTIFY ALL ABOVEGROUND COMMUNICATION FACILITIES IN
 THE AREA TO INCLUDE AN INVENTORY OF THE REGISTRANT'S
 EXISTING FACILITIES - NO INFORMATION ON EXISTING
 FACILITIES WAS PROVIDED. SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON THE
 PLANS AND PROVIDE A NARRATIVE. IF THERE ARE NO
 FACILITIES, THIS SHALL BE NOTED ON THE SURVEY.
  
 E. PLEASE NOTE: THE EXISTING DECORATIVE LIGHT SHOWN ON
 THE SURVEY IS 17 FEET TALL (CITY CODE REQUIREMENT FOR
 HIBISCUS STREET). THE SUPPORT POLE INCLUDED WITH THE
 APPLICATION IS 25 FEET IN HEIGHT, WHICH EXCEEDS THE
 ALLOWANCE LISTED IN SECTION 94-411(G)(1) OF THE CITY
 CODE.
  
 4) CONCEALMENT METHODS DESCRIPTIONS - NO CONCEALMENT
 INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PROPOSED
 SUPPORT POLE DOES NOT MEET THE CITY CONCEALMENT
 STANDARDS OUTLINED IN SECTION 78-411 OF THE CITY CODE.
 PROVIDE PLANS AND NARRATIVE ON HOW THE INSTALLATION
 COMPLIES WITH THE CITY'S CONCEALMENT REQUIREMENT.
  
 5) RESTORATION ESTIMATE - YOU MUST PROVIDE A
 RESTORATION ESTIMATE FOR THE SPECIFIC LOCATION OF THE
 POLE, NOT A GENERIC ESTIMATE THAT IS NOT LINKED TO THE
 SPECIFIC LOCATION AND WORK TO BE DONE.
  
 6) RADIO FREQUENCY INTERFERENCE - NO INFORMATION WAS
 PROVIDED THAT THE PROPOSED FACILITIES WILL NOT CAUSE
 RADIO FREQUENCY INTERFERENCE WITH THE CITY'S PUBLIC
 SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT. PROVIDE A STATEMENT
 REGARDING RADIO FREQUENCY INTERFERENCE.
  
 7) EVIDENCE OF INSURANCE COVERAGE - THE CERTIFICATE OF
 LIABILITY INSURANCE LISTS PALM BEACH COUNTY AS THE
 ADDITIONAL INSURED. THE CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY
 INSURANCE NEEDS TO BE REVISED TO NAME THE CITY OF WEST
 PALM BEACH, ITS COMMISSIONERS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND
 AGENTS AS ADDITIONAL INSURED.
  
 8) START OF OPERATION - AN ATTESTATION FROM THE
 COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES SERVICE PROVIDER THAT
 COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES FACILITIES WILL BE INSTALLED
 AND OPERATIONAL ON THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE NO LATER THAN
 NINE MONTHS AFTER THE DATE THE APPLICATION IS APPROVED
 IS REQUIRED. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED ATTESTATION.
  
 9) PUBLIC UTILITY LETTERS, TELEPHONE, NATURAL GAS,
 ELECTRIC SERVICE, AND TELEVISION CABLE - THE PUBLIC
 UTILITY LETTERS WERE NOT PROVIDED. WHILE IMPORTANT, THE
 811 RESPONSE FORM DOES NOT ADDRESS THIS COMMENT.
 PROVIDE COPIES OF THE PUBLIC UTILITY LETTERS.
  
 10) ELECTRONIC FORMAT OF SUBMITTAL - THE SUBMITTAL WAS
 NOT PROVIDED IN ELECTRONIC FORM. A COPY OF ALL OF THE
 SUBMITTAL MATERIAL MUST BE SUBMITTED IN ELECTRONIC
 FORMAT.
  
 11) PROOF OF MAILING NOTICE TO OWNERS, ONE COPY OF
 ADDRESS LIST OF PROPERTY OWNER'S ADDRESSES WITHIN 250
 FEET AND ONE COPY OF RADIUS MAP PROVIDED BY THE PAPA
 SHOWING THOSE PROPERTIES WITHIN 250 FEET OF AFFECTED
 RIGHTS-OF-WAY - A COPY OF THE RADIUS MAP WAS NOT
 SUBMITTED. THE OWNER'S ADDRESS LIST, WHILE SUBMITTED IS
 SUCH A SMALL FONT THAT IT IS NOT EASILY READABLE.
 PLEASE PROVIDE THE RADIUS MAP FROM PAPA AND THE ADDRESS
 LIST AT A BIGGER, READABLE FONT. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE
 RADIUS LOCATION IS TO BE FROM THE POLE LOCATION, WHICH
 WAS NOT DONE ON THE NODE 1 MAP PROVIDED.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved