Plan Review Details - Permit 19020379
Plan Review Stops For Permit 19020379
Review Stop AD ADDRESSING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2022-03-22 Cont ID  
Sent By cpuell Date 2022-03-22 Time 10:13 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cpuell Date 2022-03-22 Time 10:13 Sent To  
Notes
2022-03-22 10:14:17ADDRESS ASSIGNED OF 3 @ N CLEMATIS ST
Review Stop AD ADDRESSING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2022-01-05 Cont ID  
Sent By cpuell Date 2022-01-05 Time 12:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cpuell Date 2022-01-05 Time 12:44 Sent To  
Notes
2022-01-05 12:45:10101 S FLAGLER DR IS NOT AN APPROVED ADDRESS FOR THIS
 PROJECT, PLEASE CONTACT [email protected], TO BE ASSIGNED
 A GENERIC PROPERTY CONTROL NUMBER FOR VERIZON, ALSO
 PLEASE EMAIL A SITE PLAN SHOWING THE EXACT LOCATION OF
 THE POLE IS TO BE INSTALLED.
Review Stop ENG-P ENGINEERING PLANNING REVIEW
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2022-10-25 Cont ID  
Sent By sberglun Date 2022-10-25 Time 13:35 Rev Time 0.00
Received By sberglun Date 2022-10-25 Time 13:35 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG-P ENGINEERING PLANNING REVIEW
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2022-06-24 Cont ID  
Sent By sberglun Date 2022-06-24 Time 08:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By sberglun Date 2022-06-24 Time 08:08 Sent To  
Notes
2022-06-24 08:09:571) CITY UTILITIES ARE SHOWN INCORRECTLY ON PLANS.
 INCLUDE CITY UNDERGROUND UTILITIY PIPE SIZE, PIPE
 MATERIAL, AND DESCRIPTION ON THE SITE PLAN. CONTACT
 JANICE TARBILL, [email protected] FOR AS-BUILT
 INFORMATION. INCLUDE AS-BUILT INFORMATION IN YOUR
 RESUBMITTAL.
 2) PROFILE PROVIDED DOES NOT ACCURATELY SHOW CITY
 UTILITIES. INCLUDE UTILITY TYPE, PIPE SIZE, PIPE
 MATERIAL AND CROSSIND DATA FOR ALL UTILITIES.
 3) ALL ROADWAY, SIDEWALK, AND SWALE RESTORATIONS ARE
 REQUIRED PER CITY STANDARD.
  
 SUZANNE BERGLUND
 [email protected]
 561-494-1075
  
Review Stop ENG-P ENGINEERING PLANNING REVIEW
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2021-05-28 Cont ID  
Sent By gpatrie Date 2021-05-28 Time 13:30 Rev Time 0.00
Received By gpatrie Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-28 13:30:141. PULL BOX LAT & LONG LOCATION REQUIRED ON SHEET C2
 SITE PLAN.
  
 CONTACT: [email protected]
2019-02-21 13:26:28PERMIT 19020379 - 101 S. FLAGLER DRIVE POLE
  
 PLEASE SEE THE LIST BELOW FOR AN ANALYSIS OF THE
 DEFICIENCIES IN INFORMATION REQUIRED BY SECTION 78-401
 OF THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CODE AS PART OF THE
 COMMUNICATION FACILITIES PLACEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION.
 THE DEFICIENT INFORMATION MUST BE PROVIDED FOR STAFF TO
 REVIEW THE PERMIT APPLICATION. PLEASE NOTE THAT STAFF
 HAS ALSO INCLUDED SOME SUBSTANTIVE REVIEW COMMENTS,
 THAT WHILE NOT RESULTING IN A DEFICIENT APPLICATION,
 NEED TO BE ADDRESSED OR THE PERMIT WILL NOT BE
 APPROVED.
  
 1) ENGINEERING PLANS - THE ENGINEERING PLANS WERE
 SUBMITTED AT A 1/16TH = 1 FOOT SCALE, WHICH DOES NOT
 COMPLY WITH THE CITY CODE SCALE REQUIREMENT OF 10FT,
 20FT, OR 40FT SCALE. PROVIDE THE PLANS AT THE REQUIRED
 SCALE.
  
 A) SHOW DIMENSIONS ON SH C4.
  
 B) SH E4 GROUND ROD DETAIL DIMENSION "A" NOT SHOWN
  
 C) PROPOSED POLE DOES NOT SHOW ORIENTATION TO ROADWAY.
  
 D) IRRIGATION LINES NOT SHOW ON DRAWINGS.
  
 E) ALL RESTORATION TO CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY PER CITY
 STANDARD DETAILS.
  
 F) HAND HOLDS NOT LOCATED.
  
 F) ALL ROADWAY CUTS REQUIRE A MINIUM OF 25FT EITHER
 SIDE OF TRENCH FULL LANE WIDTH.
  
 2) SURVEY OF UNDERGROUND FACILITIES - THE BASE OF THE
 POLE IS BEING INSTALLED UNDERGROUND SO THIS IS
 REQUIRED. ALL SURVEYS TO BE SHOWN OVER AERIAL.
  
 A. ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES NEED TO BE PROVIDED ON THE
 SURVEY. THE PROVIDED SURVEY SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT NO
 UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATES WERE DONE, WHICH DOES NOT
 COMPLY WITH THE CITY CODE REQUIREMENTS.
  
 B. THE ENGINEERING PLAN MUST BE BASED OFF OF THIS
 SURVEY INFORMATION.
  
 3) SURVEY OF ABOVEGROUND FACILITIES - A NEW POLE IS
 BEING INSTALLED ABOVEGROUND SO THIS IS REQUIRED.
  
 A. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE SURVEY DOES NOT PROVIDE THE
 SIZE OF THE EXISTING UTILITY POLE BASE DIAMETER, WHICH
 WILL NEED TO BE CORRECTED ON THE REVISED SURVEY.
  
 B. IDENTIFY ALL ABOVEGROUND COMMUNICATION FACILITIES IN
 THE AREA TO INCLUDE AN INVENTORY OF THE REGISTRANT'S
 EXISTING FACILITIES - NO INFORMATION ON EXISTING
 FACILITIES WAS PROVIDED. SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON THE
 PLANS AND PROVIDE A NARRATIVE. IF THERE ARE NO
 FACILITIES, THIS SHALL BE NOTED ON THE SURVEY.
  
 4) CONCEALMENT METHODS DESCRIPTIONS - NO CONCEALMENT
 INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PROPOSED
 SUPPORT POLE DOES NOT MEET THE CITY CONCEALMENT
 STANDARDS OUTLINED IN SECTION 78-411 OF THE CITY CODE.
 PROVIDE PLANS AND NARRATIVE ON HOW THE INSTALLATION
 COMPLIES WITH THE CITY'S CONCEALMENT REQUIREMENT.
  
 5) RESTORATION ESTIMATE - YOU MUST PROVIDE A
 RESTORATION ESTIMATE FOR THE SPECIFIC LOCATION OF THE
 POLE, NOT A GENERIC ESTIMATE THAT IS NOT LINKED TO THE
 SPECIFIC LOCATION AND WORK TO BE DONE.
  
 6) RADIO FREQUENCY INTERFERENCE - NO INFORMATION WAS
 PROVIDED THAT THE PROPOSED FACILITIES WILL NOT CAUSE
 RADIO FREQUENCY INTERFERENCE WITH THE CITY'S PUBLIC
 SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT. PROVIDE A STATEMENT
 REGARDING RADIO FREQUENCY INTERFERENCE.
  
 7) EVIDENCE OF INSURANCE COVERAGE
  
 A. THE CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE LISTS ONLY
 THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AS THE ADDITIONAL INSURED.
 THE CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE NEEDS TO BE
 REVISED TO NAME THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, ITS
 COMMISSIONERS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS AS
 ADDITIONAL INSURED.
  
 B. THE CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE STATES THAT
 THE INSTALLATION IS IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY. THE WORK IS
 ACTUALLY WITHIN WEST PALM BEACH AND THE CERTIFICATE OF
 LIABILITY INSURANCE NEEDS TO BE CHANGED TO REFLECT
 THIS.
  
 8) START OF OPERATION - AN ATTESTATION FROM THE
 COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES SERVICE PROVIDER THAT
 COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES FACILITIES WILL BE INSTALLED
 AND OPERATIONAL ON THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE NO LATER THAN
 NINE MONTHS AFTER THE DATE THE APPLICATION IS APPROVED
 IS REQUIRED. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED ATTESTATION.
  
 9) PUBLIC UTILITY LETTERS, TELEPHONE, NATURAL GAS,
 ELECTRIC SERVICE, AND TELEVISION CABLE - THE PUBLIC
 UTILITY LETTERS WERE NOT PROVIDED. WHILE IMPORTANT, THE
 811 RESPONSE FORM DOES NOT ADDRESS THIS COMMENT.
 PROVIDE COPIES OF THE PUBLIC UTILITY LETTERS.
  
 10) ELECTRONIC FORMAT OF SUBMITTAL - THE SUBMITTAL WAS
 NOT PROVIDED IN ELECTRONIC FORM. A COPY OF ALL OF THE
 SUBMITTAL MATERIAL MUST BE SUBMITTED IN ELECTRONIC
 FORMAT.
  
 11) PROOF OF MAILING NOTICE TO OWNERS, ONE COPY OF
 ADDRESS LIST OF PROPERTY OWNER'S ADDRESSES WITHIN 250
 FEET AND ONE COPY OF RADIUS MAP PROVIDED BY THE PAPA
 SHOWING THOSE PROPERTIES WITHIN 250 FEET OF AFFECTED
 RIGHTS-OF-WAY - A COPY OF THE RADIUS MAP WAS NOT
 SUBMITTED. THE OWNER'S ADDRESS LIST, WHILE SUBMITTED IS
 SUCH A SMALL FONT THAT IT IS NOT EASILY READABLE.
 PLEASE PROVIDE THE RADIUS MAP FROM PAPA AND THE ADDRESS
 LIST AT A BIGGER, READABLE FONT.
  
 12) PUBLIC NOTICE MAILER AFFIDAVIT - THE AFFIDAVIT WAS
 PROVIDED, BUT NOTHING TO SHOW WHAT WAS MAILED OUT WAS
 PROVIDED. PLEASE CLARIFY AND PROVIDE THE INFORMATION.
  
 CONTACT GORDON PATRIE @ (561) 494-1082
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2022-12-19 Cont ID  
Sent By lmarchan Date 2022-12-19 Time 08:00 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmarchan Date 2022-11-04 Time 12:03 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2022-10-26 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcphers Date 2022-10-26 Time 08:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcphers Date 2022-09-02 Time 08:09 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2022-07-28 Cont ID  
Sent By aoliver Date 2022-07-28 Time 14:29 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2021-11-03 Time 12:59 Sent To I
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2021-12-07 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2021-05-28 Time 12:59 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2021-04-14 Time 13:29 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2022-12-12 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcphers Date 2022-12-12 Time 14:13 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcphers Date 2022-12-12 Time 14:13 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2022-10-26 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcphers Date 2022-10-26 Time 08:45 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcphers Date 2022-10-26 Time 08:45 Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-26 08:46:03SIGNATURE REVIEW
  
 CORRECTIONS NEEDED -
  
 1) DRAWING B-1 DOES NOT SHOW AS DIGITALLY SIGNED IN
 ADOBE READER -
  
 SIGNED AND SEALED DRAWINGS IN PROJECTDOX NEED TO BE
 DIGITALLY/ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED TO BE USED IN
 ELECTRONIC PLAN REVIEW. (A CERTIFICATE-BASED DIGITAL
 SIGNATURE (OFTEN JUST CALLED A DIGITAL SIGNATURE) IS A
 SPECIFIC TYPE OF E-SIGNATURE).
  
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2022-07-28 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2022-07-28 Time 14:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2022-07-28 Time 14:26 Sent To  
Notes
2022-07-28 14:29:35SIGNATURE REVIEW:
  
 1-ENGINEER DRAWINGS T-1, N-1, B-1, C-3, C-4, C-5, E-1,
 E-2, E-3 AND E-4 SUBMITTED HAVE A COPY OF THE
 ENGINEER'S SIGNATURE. PLANS NEED TO HAVE THE ORIGINAL
 SEAL AND SIGNATURE OF THE ENGINEER OF RECORD AS
 REQUIRED BY SEC. 61G15-23.001 FAC AND CHAPTER 471 F.S.
 WHEN SUBMITTING PLANS/DOCUMENTS FOR PUBLIC RECORDS.
  
 NOTE: SUBMIT DRAWINGS ELECTRONICALLY WITH VERIFIABLE
 ORIGINAL DIGITAL SIGNATURE
  
 ENGINEERS
 61G15-23.004 PROCEDURES FOR DIGITALLY SIGNING AND
 SEALING ELECTRONICALLY TRANSMITTED PLANS,
 SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS.
  
  
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2021-12-07 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2021-12-07 Time 12:58 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2021-12-07 Time 12:58 Sent To  
Notes
2021-12-07 12:58:49SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 COMMUNICATIONS APPLICATIONS - NEW PROCESS EFFECTIVE
 12/6/2021
  
 1. FOR ALL FUTURE SUBMITTALS, PRIOR TO SUBMISSION,
 CONTACT [email protected] TO OBTAIN THE CORRECT ADDRESS
 FOR YOUR APPLICATION. SHE WILL ASSIGN AN ADDRESS VIA
 EMAIL. WHEN YOU SUBMIT THE APPLICATION, INCLUDE THE
 EMAIL AS AN ATTACHMENT.
  
 2. FOR ALL FUTURE SUBMITTALS, TO SUBMIT THE
 COMMUNICATIONS APPLICATION, EMAIL THE COMPLETED
 APPLICATION TO [email protected]. THEY WILL
 GENERATE YOUR APPLICATION AND SEND YOU INSTRUCTIONS TO
 UPLOAD YOUR PLANS.
  
 3. FS471/FS481 DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ARCHITECT OR
 ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE
 SIGNED, SEALED, DATED ORIGINALS. IT APPEARS THAT THE
 DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED PAPER TO THE BUILDING DIVISION WERE
 DIGITALLY SIGNED PLANS THAT WERE PRINTED.
  
 IF THIS APPLICATION FAILS REVIEW - WHEN RESUBMITTING,
 UPLOAD INDIVIDUALLY SIGNED AND SEALED DRAWINGS IF
 POSSIBLE. IF YOU CANNOT OBTAIN PLANS IN THAT FORMAT,
 UPLOAD THE SINGLE MULTIPAGE DIGITALY SIGNED PDF TO THE
 SIGNATURE FOLDER.
  
 IF THIS APPLICATION PASSES REVIEW - UPLOAD THE
 DIGITALLY SIGNED DOCUMENTS (SHOULD BE IDENTICAL TO THE
 DOCUMENTS REVIEWED) TO THE SIGNATURE FOLDER.
  
 IF THE ENGINEER DOES NOT HAVE A DIGITAL SIGNATURE,
 PLEASE CONTACT ME DIRECTLY TO DISCUSS OPTIONS.
  
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 6 Status P Date 2022-12-16 Cont ID  
Sent By ckimmerl Date 2022-12-16 Time 16:07 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ckimmerl Date 2022-12-16 Time 16:07 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 5 Status F Date 2022-09-29 Cont ID  
Sent By ckimmerl Date 2022-09-29 Time 14:00 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ckimmerl Date 2022-09-29 Time 14:00 Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-29 14:00:54MEETS/SATISFIES ZONING REVIEW REQUIREMENTS
  
  
 ***** FAIL STATUS IS SO THAT THIS PERMIT IS VERIFIED BY
 ZONING AFTER NEXT ENGINEERING REVIEW *****
  
 THE POLE STYLE AND HEIGHT MEET CITY REQUIREMENTS. THE
 POLE COLOR AT THIS LOCATION IS RAL/RAYCAP 7022 UMBRA
 GREY A.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2022-07-26 Cont ID  
Sent By ckimmerl Date 2022-07-26 Time 10:23 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ckimmerl Date 2022-07-26 Time 10:21 Sent To  
Notes
2022-07-26 10:23:17MEETS/SATISFIES ZONING REVIEW REQUIREMENTS
  
  
 ***** FAIL STATUS IS SO THAT THIS PERMIT IS VERIFIED BY
 ZONING AFTER NEXT ENGINEERING REVIEW *****
  
 THE POLE STYLE AND HEIGHT MEET CITY REQUIREMENTS. THE
 POLE COLOR AT THIS LOCATION IS RAL/RAYCAP 7022 UMBRA
 GREY A.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2022-01-25 Cont ID  
Sent By ckimmerl Date 2022-01-25 Time 15:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ckimmerl Date 2022-01-25 Time 15:05 Sent To  
Notes
2022-01-25 15:17:20 
 1. ANTENNA POLE COLOR SHALL BE ANALOGOUS TO THE
 EXISTING DECORATIVE CITY STREET LAMPS ALONG N CLEMATIS
 ST.
  
 2. ALL SHEETS MUST SHOW THE STEALTH POLE THAT MEETS
 CITY DESIGN STANDARDS. SHEET P-2 (UNDERGROUND ROUTING
 PROFILE) SHOWS AN UNACCEPTABLE POLE DESIGN, PLEASE
 ADJUST.
  
 3. PLEASE PROVIDE THE NECESSARY PUBLIC UTILITY LETTERS
 GRANTING APPROVAL OF THE BORE PITS, HANDHOLES, AND
 UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL FOR THIS PROPOSED POLE LOCATION.
  
 4. THE POLE STEALTH DESIGN MEETS CITY STANDARDS.
  
  
 CHRIS KIMMERLY @ (561)822-1426
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2021-05-26 Cont ID  
Sent By ckimmerl Date 2021-05-26 Time 13:07 Rev Time 0.75
Received By eschneid Date 2021-05-26 Time 13:07 Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-26 13:28:33FAILED
  
 1) SHEET T1 LISTS THE SCOPE OF WORK INCLUDES THE
 INSTALLATION OF AN ENCLOSURE CABINET. NONE OF THE PLANS
 SHOW AN ENCLOSURE CABINET. PLEASE CLARIFY WHAT THIS
 MEANS. THE CITY DOES NOT PERMIT FREESTANDING OR POLE
 MOUNTED CABINETS.
  
 2) THE POLE STYLE AND HEIGHT MEET CITY REQUIREMENTS.
 THE POLE COLOR IS TO MATCH THE EXISTING DECORATIVE CITY
 LIGHT POLES (SPECKLED BLACK) LOCATED ON NORTH CLEMATIS
 STREET.
  
 3) THE GENERAL POLE LOCATION IS APPROVED BY THE SPECIAL
 EVENTS AND PLANNING STAFF; HOWEVER, THE PLANS NEED TO
 BE UPDATED TO SHOW THE FOLLOWING:
  
 A. THE STEALTH POLE SHOWN ON SHEET C3, ELEVATION AND
 EQUIPMENT PLAN, HAS A 14-INCH DIAMETER. SCALING THE
 POLE ON THE SURVEY AND SITE PLAN SHOW A SEVEN (7) INCH
 DIAMETER POLE. THE SURVEY AND SITE PLAN NEED TO SHOW
 THE CORRECT POLE SIZE AND DIMENSIONS FROM THE VARIOUS
 FEATURES SHOWN.
  
 B. THE CENTER OF THE POLE NEEDS TO BE OFFSET FROM THE
 INSIDE EDGE OF THE CURVED CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER THE
 SAME DIMENSION AS THE CENTER OF THE DECORATIVE CONCRETE
 SPHERES. THIS SHIFT OF THE PROPOSED WIRELESS POLE A
 LITTLE CLOSER TO THE CURB LINE WILL CREATE A UNIFORM
 RHYTHM OF STREET FURNITURE ALONG THE CURB LINE.
  
 4) THE UTILITY POWER PLAN WAS NOT INCLUDED THAT SHOWS
 HOW THE UNDERGROUND POWER IS BEING PROVIDED TO THE
 POLE. THE UNDERGROUND POWER PATH, INCLUDING ANY BORE
 PITS AND HANDHOLES ARE REQUIRED TO BE SHOWN ON THE
 WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY ROW PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 5) PROVIDE A SURVEY, PREPARED BY A FLORIDA LICENSED
 SURVEYOR, SHOWING THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND THE EDGE OF
 THE SIDEWALK, WITH DIMENSIONS FOR THE UNDERGROUND POWER
 ROUTE SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT IT IS WITHIN A
 RIGHT-OR-WAY AND DOES NOT CONFLICT WITH ANY UNDERGROUND
 FACILITIES, INCLUDING LANDSCAPE ROOT AREAS.
  
 6) THE ENGINEERING PLAN (UTILITY POWER PLAN) NEEDS TO
 SHOW THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE (BASED ON THE SURVEY) AND
 CLEARLY DEMONSTRATE THAT THE HANDHOLES, BORE PITS AND
 UNDERGROUND POWER BORE ARE COMPLETELY LOCATED WITHIN
 THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2019-02-20 Cont ID  
Sent By ckimmerl Date 2019-02-20 Time 17:25 Rev Time 0.50
Received By eschneid Date 2019-02-20 Time 17:25 Sent To  
Notes
2019-02-20 17:26:31PERMIT 19020379 - FLAGLER DRIVE MEDIAN, SOUTH OF N.
 CLEMATIS STREET POLE
  
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTIONS 78-402(B) AND 78-411(B)(4)
 OF THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CODE OF ORDINANCES, THE
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH IS REQUESTING THAT THIS
 PROPOSED SMALL WIRELESS FACILITY BE MOVED TO ANOTHER
 LOCATION IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND PLACED ON AN
 ALTERNATIVE UTILITY POLE OR ON A NEW UTILITY POLE TO BE
 INSTALLED WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 PLEASE SEE THE LIST BELOW FOR AN ANALYSIS OF THE
 DEFICIENCIES IN INFORMATION REQUIRED BY SECTION 78-401
 OF THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CODE AS PART OF THE
 COMMUNICATION FACILITIES PLACEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION.
 THE DEFICIENT INFORMATION MUST BE PROVIDED FOR STAFF TO
 REVIEW THE PERMIT APPLICATION. PLEASE NOTE THAT STAFF
 HAS ALSO INCLUDED SOME SUBSTANTIVE REVIEW COMMENTS,
 THAT WHILE NOT RESULTING IN A DEFICIENT APPLICATION,
 NEED TO BE ADDRESSED OR THE PERMIT WILL NOT BE
 APPROVED.
  
 1) ENGINEERING PLANS - THE ENGINEERING PLANS WERE
 SUBMITTED AT A 1/16TH = 1 FOOT SCALE, WHICH DOES NOT
 COMPLY WITH THE CITY CODE SCALE REQUIREMENT OF 10FT,
 20FT, OR 40FT SCALE. PROVIDE THE PLANS AT THE REQUIRED
 SCALE.
  
 2) SURVEY OF UNDERGROUND FACILITIES - THE BASE OF THE
 POLE IS BEING INSTALLED UNDERGROUND SO THIS IS
 REQUIRED.
  
 A. ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES NEED TO BE PROVIDED ON THE
 SURVEY. THE PROVIDED SURVEY SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT NO
 UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATES WERE DONE, WHICH DOES NOT
 COMPLY WITH THE CITY CODE REQUIREMENTS.
  
 B. THE ENGINEERING PLAN MUST BE BASED OFF OF THIS
 SURVEY INFORMATION.
  
 C. PLEASE NOTE THAT FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT IS IN THE
 PROCESS OF RELOCATING TRANSFORMERS IN THE AREA AND HAS
 INSTALLED A NEW VAULT WITH UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINES
 IN THE AREA OF THE PROPOSED POLE. THESE UNDERGROUND
 FEATURES NEED TO BE SHOWN ON A REVISED UNDERGROUND
 SURVEY THAT IS PROVIDED AS PART OF THE SUFFICIENCY
 RESUBMITTAL.
  
 3) SURVEY OF ABOVEGROUND FACILITIES - A NEW POLE IS
 BEING INSTALLED ABOVEGROUND SO THIS IS REQUIRED.
  
 A. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE SURVEY DOES NOT PROVIDE THE
 SIZE OF THE EXISTING UTILITY POLE BASE DIAMETER, WHICH
 WILL NEED TO BE CORRECTED ON THE REVISED SURVEY.
  
 B. IDENTIFY ALL ABOVEGROUND COMMUNICATION FACILITIES IN
 THE AREA TO INCLUDE AN INVENTORY OF THE REGISTRANT'S
 EXISTING FACILITIES - NO INFORMATION ON EXISTING
 FACILITIES WAS PROVIDED. SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON THE
 PLANS AND PROVIDE A NARRATIVE. IF THERE ARE NO
 FACILITIES, THIS SHALL BE NOTED ON THE SURVEY.
  
 4) CONCEALMENT METHODS DESCRIPTIONS - NO CONCEALMENT
 INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PROPOSED
 SUPPORT POLE DOES NOT MEET THE CITY CONCEALMENT
 STANDARDS OUTLINED IN SECTION 78-411 OF THE CITY CODE.
 PROVIDE PLANS AND NARRATIVE ON HOW THE INSTALLATION
 COMPLIES WITH THE CITY'S CONCEALMENT REQUIREMENT.
  
 5) RESTORATION ESTIMATE - YOU MUST PROVIDE A
 RESTORATION ESTIMATE FOR THE SPECIFIC LOCATION OF THE
 POLE, NOT A GENERIC ESTIMATE THAT IS NOT LINKED TO THE
 SPECIFIC LOCATION AND WORK TO BE DONE.
  
 6) RADIO FREQUENCY INTERFERENCE - NO INFORMATION WAS
 PROVIDED THAT THE PROPOSED FACILITIES WILL NOT CAUSE
 RADIO FREQUENCY INTERFERENCE WITH THE CITY'S PUBLIC
 SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT. PROVIDE A STATEMENT
 REGARDING RADIO FREQUENCY INTERFERENCE.
  
 7) EVIDENCE OF INSURANCE COVERAGE
  
 A. THE CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE LISTS ONLY
 THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AS THE ADDITIONAL INSURED.
 THE CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE NEEDS TO BE
 REVISED TO NAME THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, ITS
 COMMISSIONERS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS AS
 ADDITIONAL INSURED.
  
 B. THE CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE STATES THAT
 THE INSTALLATION IS IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY. THE WORK IS
 ACTUALLY WITHIN WEST PALM BEACH AND THE CERTIFICATE OF
 LIABILITY INSURANCE NEEDS TO BE CHANGED TO REFLECT
 THIS.
  
 8) START OF OPERATION - AN ATTESTATION FROM THE
 COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES SERVICE PROVIDER THAT
 COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES FACILITIES WILL BE INSTALLED
 AND OPERATIONAL ON THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE NO LATER THAN
 NINE MONTHS AFTER THE DATE THE APPLICATION IS APPROVED
 IS REQUIRED. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED ATTESTATION.
  
 9) PUBLIC UTILITY LETTERS, TELEPHONE, NATURAL GAS,
 ELECTRIC SERVICE, AND TELEVISION CABLE - THE PUBLIC
 UTILITY LETTERS WERE NOT PROVIDED. WHILE IMPORTANT, THE
 811 RESPONSE FORM DOES NOT ADDRESS THIS COMMENT.
 PROVIDE COPIES OF THE PUBLIC UTILITY LETTERS.
  
 10) ELECTRONIC FORMAT OF SUBMITTAL - THE SUBMITTAL WAS
 NOT PROVIDED IN ELECTRONIC FORM. A COPY OF ALL OF THE
 SUBMITTAL MATERIAL MUST BE SUBMITTED IN ELECTRONIC
 FORMAT.
  
 11) PROOF OF MAILING NOTICE TO OWNERS, ONE COPY OF
 ADDRESS LIST OF PROPERTY OWNER'S ADDRESSES WITHIN 250
 FEET AND ONE COPY OF RADIUS MAP PROVIDED BY THE PAPA
 SHOWING THOSE PROPERTIES WITHIN 250 FEET OF AFFECTED
 RIGHTS-OF-WAY ? A COPY OF THE RADIUS MAP WAS NOT
 SUBMITTED. THE OWNER?S ADDRESS LIST, WHILE SUBMITTED IS
 SUCH A SMALL FONT THAT IT IS NOT EASILY READABLE.
 PLEASE PROVIDE THE RADIUS MAP FROM PAPA AND THE ADDRESS
 LIST AT A BIGGER, READABLE FONT.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved