| 2019-01-22 08:46:06 | 2017 FBC- BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | W. P. B. PERMIT: 18110093 |
| | ADD: 609 8TH ST. |
| | CONT: COOPER CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & CONSULTING |
| | TEL: 561-588-5222 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | 2017 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W 2017 WEST PALM BEACH |
| | AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, |
| | ADMINISTRATION |
| | |
| | 1ST REVIEW |
| | DATE: TUES. JAN. 22/ 2019 |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | 1) ASBESTOS: IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 553.79 F. S. |
| | THIS IS TO ADVISE YOU OF THE OWNERS OR OPERATORS? |
| | RESPONSIBILITY TO COMPLY WITH THE STATE & FEDERAL |
| | ASBESTOS REGULATIONS, INCLUDING SECTION 376.60 F. S. |
| | AND CFR 61- NESHAP REQUIREMENTS. REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE- |
| | ASBESTOS SURVEYS AND SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN NOTIFICATION |
| | TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PRIOR TO: |
| | * DEMOLITION OF ALL REGULATED STRUCTURES; |
| | * MOST RENOVATION ACTIVITIES IN REGULATED STRUCTURES |
| | WHERE ASBESTOS IS DISTURBED OR REMOVED. |
| | NON-COMPLIANCE MAY RESULT IN SEVERE MONETARY PENALTY. |
| | |
| | FOR FURTHER INFORMATION IN PALM BEACH COUNTY, CONTACT |
| | THE DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND ENGINEERING |
| | HRS/ PALM BEACH COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH UNIT |
| | (DIVISION OF ENGINEERING SCIENCE & ENGINEERING AIR |
| | POLLUTION CONTROL SECTION) |
| | |
| | 901 EVERNIA STREET |
| | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 |
| | (561) 355-3070 |
| | |
| | 2) THIS BUILDING QUALIFIES AS A THRESHOLD BUILDING / FL |
| | S. S. 553.71(7) ?THRESHOLD BUILDING" MEANING ANY |
| | BUILDING WHICH IS GREATER THAN (3) STORIES OR 50 FT. IN |
| | HEIGHT, OR WHICH HAS AN ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY |
| | CLASSIFICATION AS DENIED IN THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| | WHICH EXCEEDS 5,000 SQ. FT. IN AREA AND AN OCCUPANT |
| | CONTENT OF GREATER THAN 500 PERSONS. |
| | |
| | 2A) COMPLETED. 109.3.6.1 THRESHOLD INSPECTION PLAN. THE |
| | ENFORCING AGENCY SHALL REQUIRE A (WRITTEN/ TYPED) |
| | SPECIAL INSPECTOR TO PERFORM STRUCTURAL INSPECTIONS ON |
| | A THRESHOLD BUILDING PURSUANT TO A STRUCTURAL |
| | INSPECTION PLAN PREPARED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. THE |
| | STRUCTURAL INSPECTION PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE |
| | ENFORCING AGENCY PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING |
| | PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A THRESHOLD BUILDING. |
| | THE PURPOSE OF THE STRUCTURAL INSPECTION PLAN IS TO |
| | PROVIDE SPECIFIC INSPECTION PROCEDURES AND SCHEDULES SO |
| | THAT THE BUILDING CAN BE ADEQUATELY INSPECTED FOR |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE PERMITTED DOCUMENTS. |
| | |
| | 2B) THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: WPB AMENDMENT 109.3.6.2 W.P.B. |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR THRESHOLD |
| | BUILDINGS A SPECIAL INSPECTOR AS REQUIRED BY FL S S |
| | 553.79(5) FLORIDA STATUTES TO THE MINIMUM INSPECTIONS |
| | REQUIRED BY THIS CODE. THE THRESHOLD INSPECTION FORMS |
| | ARE REQUIRED TO BE FILED OUT BY ALL PARTIES WITH |
| | INTEREST, NOTARIZED AND RETURNED TO THIS OFFICE, AND |
| | REVIEWED AND APPROVED BEFORE PERMIT ISSUANCE WILL TAKE |
| | PLACE. |
| | |
| | FORMS SENT TO: [email protected] MON. JAN. 14/ 2019 |
| | 12:54 PM |
| | |
| | 2C) THRESHOLD BLDG., REQUIRED STATEMENT: W.P.B. |
| | AMENDMENT 110.3.7.4.4 ALL PLANS FOR THE BUILDING WHICH |
| | ARE REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE ARCHITECT |
| | OR ENGINEER OF RECORD CONTAIN A STATEMENT THAT, TO THE |
| | BEST OF THE ARCHITECT'S OR ENGINEER'S KNOWLEDGE, THE |
| | PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE |
| | FIRE-SAFETY STANDARDS AS DETERMINED BY THE LOCAL |
| | AUTHORITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION AND 633 |
| | FLORIDA STATUTE. |
| | |
| | 2D) FOR THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR PLEASE PROVIDE A RESUME' |
| | OF INSPECTION EXPERIENCE ON PREVIOUS PROJECT. THE |
| | RESUME' MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY ALL CERTIFICATES AS |
| | SPECIFIED HEREIN. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OR HIS DESIGNEE |
| | WILL REVIEW THE RESUME'. AFTER THE RESUME' IS REVIEWED, |
| | AN INTERVIEW WILL BE SCHEDULED. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES |
| | WILL AN INSPECTOR BE INTERVIEWED FOR WORK WITHOUT FIRST |
| | MEETING THE ABOVE CRITERIA. |
| | |
| | 2E) THE CONTRACTOR WILL PRODUCE A JOB SUMMARY OR |
| | HISTORY FOR THIS TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION. |
| | |
| | 2F) NOTE FOR PAPER PLANS 3 SETS OF DOCUMENTS ARE |
| | REQUIRED. FOR DIGITAL PLANS, AFTER PERMIT ISSUANCE, |
| | PLEASE E-MAIL THE PERMIT LIBRARIAN OF THE PERMIT BEING |
| | ISSUED, THE PERMIT LIBRARIAN WILL THEN E-MAIL YOU THE |
| | APPROVED AND BATCH STAMPED PLANS SO YOU MAY PRINT YOUR |
| | PLANS, TWO SETS OF PLANS WILL NEED TO BE PRINTED IN |
| | COLOR, (1) FOR THE THRESHOLD INSPECTOR, THE OTHER FOR |
| | THE MEP INSPECTORS OTHER PLANS YOU WISH TO PRINT MAYBE |
| | IN BLACK & WHITE.. |
| | 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| | CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 110.3.7 THRESHOLD |
| | BUILDINGS, GUIDELINES AND POLICIES FOR PROJECTS |
| | CONCERNING SPECIAL INSPECTORS. |
| | |
| | 2G) 110.3.7.4.3 ALL SHORING AND RESHORING PROCEDURES, |
| | PLANS AND DETAILS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ENFORCEMENT |
| | AGENCY FOR RECORDKEEPING. EACH SHORING AND RESHORING |
| | INSTALLATION SHALL BE SUPERVISED, INSPECTED AND |
| | CERTIFIED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE SHORING |
| | DOCUMENTS BY THE CONTRACTOR. |
| | |
| | 2H) PLEASE CALL THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH?S AUTOMATED |
| | TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS LINE (561) 805-6700) FOR ALL |
| | BUILDING INSPECTIONS FOR AUDITING OF JOBSITE |
| | INSPECTIONS WITHOUT THIS THE PERMIT EXPIRES IN 6 |
| | MONTHS, ABANDONMENT OF JOB, NO INSPECTION ACTIVITY. |
| | |
| | 2I) 109.3.6 THRESHOLD BUILDINGS, OPERATING GUIDELINES |
| | FOR THRESHOLD INSPECTORS #26. ASSURE THAT THE DESIGNER |
| | HAS REQUIRED ON THE PLANS OR SPECIFICATIONS ONE |
| | MATERIAL, APPROVED FOR FIRE STOPPING PENETRATIONS, FOR |
| | WALLS AND CEILINGS. |
| | |
| | 3) THE STRUCTURAL SHEET S0.1 UNDER THE HEADING |
| | EARTHWORK & FOUNDATIONS NOTE A INDICATES THAT THE |
| | FOUNDATION DESIGN WAS BASED ON THE GEOTECHNICAL |
| | ENGINEERING REPORT PREPARED BY TERRACON CONSULTANTS, |
| | INC. (REPORT NO. 185072). DATED JULY 20/2018. PLEASE |
| | SUBMIT AN ELECTRONIC REPORT WITH ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE |
| | OR A PAPER REPORT WITH SIGNATURE AND SEAL. |
| | |
| | 4A) THE SHEET S0.1 GENERAL NOTES, DESIGN CRITERIA (4) |
| | WIND LOADS OR THE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA IS MISSING THE |
| | MEAN ROOF HEIGHT FOR MULTIPLIERS FOR THE HEIGHT OF THE |
| | BUILDING AND EXPOSURE. WIND EXPOSURE. APPLICABLE WIND |
| | DIRECTION IF MORE THAN ONE WIND EXPOSURE IS UTILIZED. |
| | TABLE 1609.7.2. HEIGHT AND EXPOSURE. ASCE 7-10 TABLE |
| | 30.3.1. THE CODE ANALYSIS ON SHEET A0.03 DOES STATE THE |
| | MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT OF 41 FEET 7 INCHES. THIS IS |
| | NOT GIVEN IN THE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA, AND THE FACTOR |
| | FOR HEIGHT AND EXPOSURE IS NOT GIVEN, B EXPOSURE @ 40 |
| | FEET. MULTIPLIER OF 1.09 USED. |
| | |
| | 4B) THE OTHER ISSUE IS IN NOTE 5 ON SHEET S0.4. DESIGN |
| | VALUES SHOWN IN THIS TABLE ARE ULTIMATE VALUES FOR USE |
| | WITH LRFD (LOAD RESISTANCE FACTORED DESIGN). THE 2017 |
| | FBC-B USES PRESSURES FOR COMPONENTS AND CLADDING IN |
| | VULT( ULTIMATE DESIGN WIND SPEED) AND VASD (ALLOWABLE |
| | OR NOMINAL SERVICE LOADS). THE SAME HOLDS TRUE IN ASCE |
| | 7-10 CHAPTER 30 HOLDS TRUE TO THE USAGE OF THE |
| | TERMINOLOGY OF VULT AND VASD. THE TERMINOLOGY OF LRFD |
| | LENDS ITSELF TO MORE LIKE CONCRETE, STEEL AND TIMBER. |
| | |
| | 4C) PLEASE SUBMIT THE WIND PRESSURES IN VASD SINCE ALL |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE PUBLISHED IN VASD, THE INSPECTORS |
| | DO NOT HAVE THE TIME TO COMPUTE THE VULT TO VASD. FBC-B |
| | 1609.3.1. |
| | |
| | 5) COMPONENTS & CLADDING. 2017 FBC-B 1609.1.2 |
| | PROTECTION OF OPENINGS, 1609.6.4.4.1 COMPONENTS & |
| | CLADDING. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 61G20-3.005, RULE 9N-3 NOV. 01/ |
| | 2010 (31) SUB-CATEGORY OF PRODUCTS OR CONSTRUCTION |
| | SYSTEMS THAT WILL REQUIRE PRODUCT APPROVALS: |
| | (31)(A) EXTERIOR DOORS ,MULLIONS & ROOF HATCHES. |
| | (B) WINDOWS & MULLIONS |
| | (C) PANEL WALLS: STOREFRONTS, WALL LOUVERS, |
| | (D) ROOFING PRODUCTS AND ASSEMBLIES, LIGHTWEIGHT |
| | CONCRETE INSULATION, ROOF TOP VENTILATORS |
| | (G) PRE-ENGINEERED A/C STANDS |
| | |
| | 5A) W. P. B. 107.3.4. PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCTS |
| | WHICH ARE REGULATED BY FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE RULE |
| | 61G20 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR |
| | JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| | FL 61G1-23.015 (2) THE ARCHITECT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR |
| | SUPERVISING AND REVIEWING ALL PROJECT DATA, REPORTS, |
| | SHOP DRAWINGS ETC.. |
| | |
| | DELEGATED ENGINEERING. 61G15-30.003 ENGINEERING |
| | DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION. FL 61G-15-30.006 (3) THE |
| | DELEGATED ENGINEER SHALL FORWARD THE DELEGATED |
| | ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS TO THE ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR |
| | REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 5B) 107.3.4.2 DEFERRED SUBMITTALS. FOR THE PURPOSES OF |
| | THIS SECTION, DEFERRED SUBMITTALS ARE DEFINED AS THOSE |
| | PORTIONS OF THE DESIGN THAT ARE NOT SUBMITTED AT THE |
| | TIME OF THE APPLICATION AND THAT ARE TO BE SUBMITTED TO |
| | THE BUILDING OFFICIAL WITHIN A SPECIFIED PERIOD. |
| | DEFERRAL OF ANY SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL HAVE THE PRIOR |
| | APPROVAL OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. THE REGISTERED |
| | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE SHALL LIST |
| | THE DEFERRED SUBMITTALS ON THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS |
| | FOR REVIEW BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. |
| | |
| | DOCUMENTS FOR DEFERRED SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL BE |
| | SUBMITTED TO THE REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN |
| | RESPONSIBLE CHARGE WHO SHALL REVIEW THEM AND FORWARD |
| | THEM TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL WITH A NOTATION |
| | INDICATING THAT THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS HAVE |
| | BEEN REVIEWED AND FOUND TO BE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE TO |
| | THE DESIGN OF THE BUILDING. THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL |
| | ITEMS SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED UNTIL THE DEFERRED |
| | SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE BUILDING |
| | OFFICIAL. |
| | |
| | 5C) IDENTIFY GLAZING/ MULLIONS. PLEASE IDENTIFY ON THE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL BEFORE SUBMITTING TO DESIGNER OF |
| | RECORD AND BEFORE SUBMISSION TO THE BUILDING |
| | DEPARTMENT. FOR ALL PRODUCTS WITH GLAZING, PLEASE |
| | IDENTIFY THE OPENING WIDTH & HEIGHT, TYPE OF GLAZING, |
| | MULLION SIZE, LENGTH IF UNREINFORCED OR REINFORCED |
| | INFORMATION IF REQUIRED, ATTACHMENTS AND ASSOCIATE |
| | PRESSURES FOR EACH OPENING SIZE. 2014 FBC-B 1405.13.1 |
| | INSTALLATION. WINDOWS AND DOORS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVED MANUFACTURER?S INSTRUCTIONS. |
| | FASTENER SIZE AND SPACING SHALL BE PROVIDED IN SUCH |
| | INSTRUCTIONS AND SHALL BE CALCULATED BASED ON MAXIMUM |
| | LOADS AND SPACING USED IN THE TESTS. |
| | |
| | 6) SHEET C6.1& C2.1 SHOWS THE EXISTING BUILDING GOING |
| | THROUGH THE PROPERTY LINE FOR LOT 4 & 5, AND THE |
| | PROPOSED 3 STORY ADDITION GOING THROUGH THE PROPERTY |
| | LINE BETWEEN LOTS 5 & 6. PLEASE PROVIDE IS THE3 LOTS |
| | GOING TO BE REPLATED. SO NO PROPERTY LINES GO THROUGH |
| | THE BUILDING AND THE REQUIREMENT FOR 4 HOUR FIRE WALLS |
| | WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. 2017 FBC-B TABLE 602 & FIRE WALLS |
| | FBC-B 706.1.1. |
| | |
| | 7A) SHEET 005-A0.03 CODE ANALYSIS. THE 2017 FLORIDA |
| | EXISTING BUILDING CODE, PRESCRIPTIVE COMPLIANCE METHOD. |
| | CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY. 407.1. 407.1 CONFORMANCE. NO |
| | CHANGE SHALL BE MADE IN THE USE OR OCCUPANCY OF ANY |
| | BUILDING UNLESS SUCH BUILDING IS MADE TO COMPLY WITH |
| | THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING |
| | FOR THE USE OR OCCUPANCY. CHANGES IN USE OR OCCUPANCY |
| | IN A BUILDING OR PORTION THEREOF SHALL BE SUCH THAT THE |
| | EXISTING BUILDING IS NO LESS COMPLYING WITH THE |
| | PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE THAN THE EXISTING BUILDING OR |
| | STRUCTURE WAS PRIOR TO THE CHANGE. SUBJECT TO THE |
| | APPROVAL OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, THE USE OR OCCUPANCY |
| | OF EXISTING BUILDINGS SHALL BE PERMITTED TO BE CHANGED |
| | AND THE BUILDING IS ALLOWED TO BE OCCUPIED FOR PURPOSES |
| | IN OTHER GROUPS WITHOUT CONFORMING TO ALL OF THE |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF THIS CODE FOR THOSE GROUPS, PROVIDED |
| | THE NEW OR PROPOSED USE IS LESS HAZARDOUS, BASED ON |
| | LIFE AND FIRE RISK, THAN THE EXISTING USE. |
| | PLEASE NOTE THE CODE RESEARCH FOUND ON SHEET A0.03 DOES |
| | INDICATE THAT THERE WERE 2 FLOORS WITH AN R-2 |
| | OCCUPANCY. SO THERE IS A PARTIAL CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY. |
| | THE NEW OCCUPANCY (ASSEMBLY) IS A MORE STRINGENT USE |
| | AND OCCUPANCY THAN THE R2. |
| | |
| | 2017 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING CODE 401.3 DANGEROUS |
| | CONDITIONS. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL SHALL HAVE THE |
| | AUTHORITY TO REQUIRE THE ELIMINATION OF CONDITIONS |
| | DEEMED DANGEROUS. THIS NOTE HOLDS TRUE FOR ALL OF |
| | COMMENTS 7A- 7_. |
| | |
| | 7B) PLEASE NOTE SHEET 005-A0.03 CODE ANALYSIS UNDER THE |
| | HEADING CODE RESEARCH APPLICABLE CODES. THE DESIGNER OF |
| | RECORD LIST THE APPLICABLE CODES 2017 FBC-EB CHAPTER 4 |
| | PRESCRIPTIVE COMPLIANCE METHOD AND CHAPTER 12 HISTORIC |
| | BUILDINGS. ON THE LEFT SIDE OF THE SAME PAGE THE WORK |
| | AREA METHOD, LEVEL 2, LEVEL 3 CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY 10 |
| | WHICH IS UNDER THE WORK AREA METHOD OF COMPLIANCE, |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY TO WHAT DESIGN METHOD (EXISTING BUILDING |
| | CODE) THIS PROJECT IS TO BE DESIGNED AND COMPLY? |
| | 107.2.1.2. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS REQUIRED. THIS |
| | REVIEW WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED UNDER THE 2017 FBC-EB |
| | CHAPTER 4 PRESCRIPTIVE COMPLIANCE METHOD AND CHAPTER 12 |
| | HISTORIC BUILDINGS AND THE 2017 FBC-BUILDING WHERE |
| | DIRECTED BY CHAPTER 4 PRESCRIPTIVE COMPLIANCE METHOD. |
| | |
| | 7C) PLEASE NOTE SHEET 005-A0.03 CODE ANALYSIS UNDER THE |
| | HEADING OCCUPANCY DATA ROOMS 201 BALLROOM, & ROOM 202 |
| | UNDER STAGE ARE TO IN THE SAME ROOM. BALLROOM LENDS ONE |
| | TO BELIEVE THERE WILL BE DANCING IN THIS ROOM. IN THE |
| | OCCUPANCY TABLE CHART LIST TABLE 1004.1.2 WITH ASSEMBLY |
| | UNCONCENTRATED 1/15 NET. |
| | PLEASE REVIEW TABLE 1004.1.2 OF THE 2017 FBC-B 15 SQ. |
| | FT. WOULD BE USED FOR TABLES AND CHAIRS, 7 SQ. FT. |
| | WOULD BE USED FOR CHAIRS ONLY, & 5 SQ. FT. WOULD BE |
| | USED FOR STANDING. IT WOULD APPEAR THAT DANCING WOULD |
| | BE THE CLOSEST FIT TO THE USAGE AND 5 SQ. FT. SHOULD BE |
| | USED FOR THE CODE ANALYSIS FOR THE 2ND FLOOR. |
| | |
| | 7D) THIS WILL TRIPLE THE OCCUPANT LOAD PLEASE PROVIDE A |
| | NEW ANALYSIS FOR THIS FLOOR FOR EXITING. PLEASE SHOW |
| | HOW THE OCCUPANTS WILL EXIT SHOW THE EXITING FOR THIS |
| | FLOOR AND THE ADDITIONAL LOAD FROM THE MEZZANINE. THE |
| | MEZZANINE OCCUPANT LOAD IS FIGURED IN WITH THE 2ND |
| | FLOOR OCCUPANT LOAD FOR EXITING. PLEASE PROVIDE THE |
| | TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD FOR THE 2ND FLOOR WITH MEZZANINE |
| | OCCUPANT LOAD. FBC-B 1019.1. 2017 FBC-B 505.2.2 MEANS |
| | OF EGRESS. THE MEANS OF EGRESS FOR MEZZANINES SHALL |
| | COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 10. |
| | |
| | 7E) SINCE THE 2017 FBC-B SECTION 1019.3 (MEZZANINE |
| | LEVEL & 2ND FLOOR) DOES ALLOW FOR OPEN STAIRS (EXIT |
| | ACCESS STAIRWAYS) FOR 2 STORIES: |
| | 1019.3. (1). EXIT ACCESS STAIRWAYS AND RAMPS THAT SERVE |
| | OR ATMOSPHERICALLY COMMUNICATE BETWEEN ONLY TWO |
| | STORIES. SUCH INTERCONNECTED STORIES SHALL NOT BE OPEN |
| | TO OTHER STORIES. PLEASE SHOW HOW EXITING IS TO OCCUR |
| | WITH NOT GOING THROUGH THE NEW 3 STORY ADDITION. |
| | |
| | 7F) MEANS OF EGRESS HEADING. FOR THE MEZZANINE LEVEL |
| | AND 2ND FLOOR, PLEASE SHOW THE TRAVEL DISTANCE FROM THE |
| | MOST REMOTE POINT ON THE MEZZANINE LEVEL TO AN EXIT, |
| | SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH |
| | 2017 FBC-B TABLE 1017.2 ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY, 250 FEET/ |
| | FIRE SPRINKLERED BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 7G) THE CODE ANALYSIS SHEET A0.03 UNDER THE HEADING |
| | MEANS OF EGRESS HAS TAKEN A FACTOR OF 0.2? PER OCCUPANT |
| | FOR STAIRS AND A FACTOR OF 0.15? FOR OTHER MEANS OF |
| | EGRESS OTHER COMPONENT WIDTHS. THIS EXCEPTION IS FROM |
| | THE 2017 FBC-B SECTION 1005.3.1 EXCEPTION 1. THE |
| | EXCEPTION STATES: IN BUILDINGS EQUIPPED THROUGHOUT WITH |
| | AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE |
| | WITH SECTION 903.3.1.1 OR 903.3.1.2 AND AN EMERGENCY |
| | VOICE/ALARM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH |
| | SECTION 907.5.2.2. IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED |
| | YOU ARE TAKING THE EXCEPTION BUT NO PLANS WERE |
| | SUBMITTED FOR THE EMERGENCY VOICE/ALARM COMMUNICATION |
| | SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 907.5.2.2. |
| | |
| | 7H) THE CODE ANALYSIS SHEET A0.03 UNDER THE HEADING |
| | MEANS OF EGRESS LIST UNDER THE STAIR REQUIREMENT A |
| | SINGLE STAIR AND THE SAME FOR DOORWAYS/ EXITS A SINGLE |
| | DOOR WAY AS MEETING THE WIDTH REQUIREMENTS. WHEN AN |
| | OCCUPANT LOAD IS MORE THAN 49 THERE IS REQUIRED 2 MEANS |
| | OF EGRESS SEE TABLE 1006.1.2 OF THE 2017 FBC-B. |
| | |
| | 7I) (1) THE CODE ANALYSIS SHEET A0.03 UNDER THE HEADING |
| | MEANS OF EGRESS LIST UNDER THE STAIR REQUIREMENT |
| | MINIMUM WIDTH LIST THE FBC 1009.4. PLEASE NOTE THIS IS |
| | AN OLD CODE SECTION. UNDER THE 2017 FBC-B SECTION |
| | 1011.2 IS WIDTH AND CAPACITY. |
| | |
| | 7I) (2) THE CODE ANALYSIS SHEET A0.03 UNDER THE HEADING |
| | MEANS OF EGRESS LIST UNDER THE STAIR REQUIREMENT |
| | MINIMUM STAIR WIDTH LIST < 50 OCCUPANTS = 36 INCH |
| | STAIRS (AT MEZZANINE STAIRS). PLEASE BE AWARE IN THE |
| | 2015 IBC COMMENTARY SECTION 1011.2 EXCEPTION 1 STATES: |
| | THE USE OF THIS EXCEPTION IS LIMITED TO BUILDINGS WHERE |
| | THE ENTIRE OCCUPANT LOAD OF EACH UPPER STORY AND / OR |
| | BASEMENT IS LESS THAN 50. |
| | |
| | 7J) THE CODE ANALYSIS LIST THE EXISTING 3RD FLOOR A R2 |
| | RESIDENTIAL MEZZANINE. SHEET 053-A1.01 LIST THE |
| | BUILDING AREAS. THE 2ND FLOOR OF THE EXISTING BUILDING |
| | IS GIVEN AS 4,670 SQ. FT. AND THE EXISTING MEZZANINE |
| | STAGE AS 2,530 SQ. FT. EQUALS 0.54 PERCENT OF THE 2ND |
| | FLOOR. MY CALCULATIONS FOR THE 2ND FLOOR ARE 41X89= |
| | 3,649 SQ. FT. AND FOR THE MEZZANINE WITHOUT STAIRS |
| | BEING DEDUCTED ARE 2,284 SQ. FT. OR 0.62 % OF THE 2ND |
| | FLOOR, THIS MAKES THE 3RD LEVEL A 3RD FLOOR NOT A |
| | MEZZANINE WITH A 2 STORY ATRIUM BETWEEN THE 2ND FLOOR |
| | AND 3RD FLOOR. PLEASE NOTE IF THERE ARE OPEN STAIRS |
| | THAT COMMUNICATE WITH THE 1ST FLOOR THEN THERE IS A 3 |
| | STORY ATRIUM THAT WOULD COMMUNICATE. |
| | |
| | 7K) PLEASE NOTE IN THE 2017 FBC DECLARING A BUILDING |
| | TYPE III-B IS THE EQUIVALENT TO A BUILDING TYPE V IN |
| | THE 1935 WEST PALM BEACH BUILDING CODE. SECTION 2202. |
| | TYPE V BUILDINGS SHALL NOT EXCEED A HEIGHT OF 35 FEET |
| | IN HEIGHT IN WHICH THERE MAY BE NO MORE THAN 2 I/2 |
| | STORIES. |
| | 1935 DEFINITION FOR: HEIGHT OF BUILDING. IS THE |
| | VERTICAL DISTANCE FROM THE GRADE TO THE HIGHEST POINT |
| | OF THE COPING OF A FLAT ROOFED BUILDING TO THE DECK |
| | LINE OF A MANSARD ROOF OR TO THE AVERAGE HEIGHT OF THE |
| | HIGHEST GABLE OF A PITCH OR HIP ROOF. |
| | |
| | 7L) PLEASE ALSO NOTE IN THE 1035 WEST PALM BEACH |
| | BUILDING CODE, THE CODE ONLY MAKES MENTION OF |
| | MEZZANINES IN BUILDING TYPES I AND II BUILDINGS. WHICH |
| | IN THE 2017 FBC-B WOULD BE TYPE I-A AND I-B TYPE |
| | BUILDINGS. |
| | PLEASE ALSO NOTE THAT UNDER THE 1935 CODE TYPE II |
| | CONSTRUCTION WAS HEAVY TIMBER BUILDINGS COULD BE UP TO |
| | 65 FEET IN HEIGHT, 5 STORIES, (HEAVY TIMBER BUILDINGS |
| | CANNOT EXCEED ONE STORY) ROOF CONSTRUCTION HEAVY |
| | TIMBER, FLOORS AND NON-BEARING PARTITIONS MAYBE OF |
| | WOOD. |
| | |
| | 8) STAIR SHAFTS & ELEVATOR SHAFTS: |
| | 8A) STAIR 126 ON THE 2ND FLOOR AND 3RD FLOOR THERE ARE |
| | DUCTS PENETRATING THE STAIRWELL SHAFT WITH A A/C VENT. |
| | SEE SHEETS 096-M-102 AND 097-M-103. PLEASE REVIEW: |
| | |
| | 2017 FBC-B 1023.5 PENETRATIONS. PENETRATIONS INTO OR |
| | THROUGH INTERIOR EXIT STAIRWAYS AND RAMPS ARE |
| | PROHIBITED EXCEPT FOR EQUIPMENT AND DUCTWORK NECESSARY |
| | FOR INDEPENDENT VENTILATION OR PRESSURIZATION, |
| | SPRINKLER PIPING, STANDPIPES, ELECTRICAL RACEWAY FOR |
| | FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS AND ELECTRICAL |
| | RACE-WAY SERVING THE INTERIOR EXIT STAIRWAY AND RAMP |
| | AND TERMINATING AT A STEEL BOX NOT EXCEEDING 16 SQUARE |
| | INCHES (0.010 M2). SUCH PENETRATIONS SHALL BE PROTECTED |
| | IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 714. THERE SHALL NOT BE |
| | PENETRATIONS OR COMMUNICATION OPENINGS, WHETHER |
| | PROTECTED OR NOT, BETWEEN ADJACENT INTERIOR EXIT |
| | STAIRWAYS. |
| | |
| | 8B) SHEET 097-M-103 IN THE ELEV. F1 THERE APPEARS TO BE |
| | A 4 INCH DIAMETER SUPPLY THAT DUMPS INTO THE ELECTRIC |
| | ROOM 315. PLEASE REVIEW THE 2017 FBC-B SECTIONS: |
| | FBC-B 3002.1 HOISTWAY ENCLOSURE PROTECTION. ELEVATOR |
| | ENCLOSURES SHALL BE SHAFT ENCLOSURES COMPLYING WITH |
| | SECTION 713. |
| | |
| | FBC-B 713.8.1 PROHIBITED PENETRATIONS. PENETRATIONS |
| | OTHER THAN THOSE NECESSARY FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE SHAFT |
| | SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED IN SHAFT ENCLOSURES. |
| | |
| | 8C)(1) SHEET 056-A1.04 STAIR 126 NOTE # 3 INDICATES THE |
| | USE OF A ROOF HATCH, SHEET 081-A4.10 STAIR 126 DETAIL |
| | NO. 7 ALSO SHOWS THE ROOF HATCH. 2017 FBC-B 1023.5 |
| | PENETRATIONS. PENETRATIONS INTO OR THROUGH INTERIOR |
| | EXIT STAIRWAYS AND RAMPS ARE PROHIBITED EXCEPT FOR |
| | EQUIPMENT AND DUCTWORK NECESSARY FOR INDEPENDENT |
| | VENTILATION OR PRESSURIZATION, SPRINKLER PIPING, |
| | STANDPIPES, ELECTRICAL RACEWAY FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| | COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS AND ELECTRICAL RACE-WAY SERVING |
| | THE INTERIOR EXIT STAIRWAY AND RAMP AND TERMINATING AT |
| | A STEEL BOX NOT EXCEEDING 16 SQUARE INCHES (0.010 M2). |
| | SUCH PENETRATIONS SHALL BE PROTECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH |
| | SECTION 714. THERE SHALL NOT BE PENETRATIONS OR |
| | COMMUNICATION OPENINGS, WHETHER PROTECTED OR NOT, |
| | BETWEEN ADJACENT INTERIOR EXIT STAIRWAYS. |
| | |
| | 8C)(2) SHEET 056-A1.04 STAIR 126 NOTE # 3 INDICATES THE |
| | USE OF A ROOF HATCH, SHEET 081-A4.10 STAIR 126 DETAIL |
| | NO. 7 ALSO SHOWS THE ROOF HATCH. PLEASE NOTE DOOR |
| | SCHEDULE FOUND ON SHEET 090-A6.02 INDICATES A DOOR # |
| | 401 A BILCO (NOA 14-0708.07) TYPE S ROOF HATCH. PLEASE |
| | REVIEW 3 OF 10 OF THIS PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR CLEAR |
| | OPENING SIZE AND COMPLIANCE WITH FBC-B 1011.12.2 ROOF |
| | ACCESS EXCEPTION. IN BUILDINGS WITHOUT OCCUPIED ROOFS, |
| | ACCESS TO THE ROOF SHALL BE PERMITTED TO BE A ROOF |
| | HATCH OR TRAPDOOR NOT LESS THAN 16 SQUARE FEET IN AREA |
| | AND HAVING A MINIMUM DIMENSION OF 2 FEET. |
| | |
| | 9) SHEET 056-A1.04 DETAIL # 2 INDICATES THE USE OF A |
| | CONCRETE PAVER PEDESTAL SYSTEM. |
| | |
| | 9A) PLEASE INDICATE WHERE THE APPROVED ROOF COVERING IS |
| | IN THIS DETAIL. THE DETAIL SHOWS CONCRETE PLANK |
| | STRUCTURAL ROOF DECK SYSTEM, 2 INCH RIGID BOARD |
| | INSULATION, LIGHTWEIGHT CONCRETE TOPPING, SLOPED TO |
| | ROOF DRAINS, AND PEDESTAL CONCRETE PAVER SYSTEM? |
| | |
| | 2017 FBC-B 1503.1. ROOF DECKS SHALL BE COVERED WITH |
| | APPROVED ROOF COVERINGS SECURED TO THE BUILDING OR |
| | STRUCTURE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS |
| | CHAPTER. ROOF COVERINGS SHALL BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED |
| | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS CODE AND THE APPROVED |
| | MANUFACTURER?S INSTRUCTIONS SUCH THAT THE ROOF COVERING |
| | SHALL SERVE TO PROTECT THE BUILDING OR STRUCTURE. |
| | |
| | 9B) PLEASE SUBMIT THE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE CONCRETE |
| | PAVER PEDESTAL SYSTEM AND THAT WAS TESTED FOR THIS TYPE |
| | OF INSTALLATION ONTO LIGHTWEIGHT CONCRETE. 107.2.1.2 |
| | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED. |
| | 2017 FBC-B 1609.5.2 ROOF COVERINGS. ROOF COVERINGS |
| | SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 1609.5.1. |
| | |
| | 1609.5.1 ROOF DECK. THE ROOF DECK SHALL BE DESIGNED TO |
| | WITHSTAND THE WIND PRESSURES DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE |
| | WITH ASCE 7. |
| | |
| | 10) A THOROUGH REVIEW OF THE PLANS COULD NOT HAPPEN |
| | SINCE THERE WAS A GREAT DEFICIENCY IN PLANS AND |
| | REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION. A COMPLETE REVIEW DID NOT OCCUR |
| | IN THE 1ST REVIEW CYCLE, WITH THE NEXT PLAN REVIEW |
| | CYCLE THERE MAYBE ADDITIONAL NEW REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | BECAUSE OF, PORTIONS OF PLANS NOT REVIEWED, NEW PLANS |
| | AND INFORMATION LACKING UNDER THE PRIOR REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 11) - DIGITAL SUBMITTALS: PLANS WILL BE REVIEWED BY THE |
| | PBC IMPACT FEE OFFICE DIGITALLY VIA PROJECT DOX UPON |
| | NOTIFICATION BY THIS OFFICE. NOTIFICATION MAY OCCUR |
| | WHEN PLANS ARE NEAREST FINAL FORM. YOU MAY COORDINATE |
| | WITH THE IMPACT FEE OFFICE AT (561) 233-5025 OR SIMPLY |
| | UPLOAD THE MUNICIPAL IMPACT FEE QUESTIONNAIRE FORM TO |
| | YOUR PROJECT AND NAME THE FILE MUNICIPAL IMPACT FEE |
| | QUESTIONNAIRE. THE FORM CAN BE FOUND AT: HTTP://DISCOVE |
| | R.PBCGOV.ORG/PZB/ADMINISTRATION/PDF/IMPACTFEES/FORMS/QU |
| | ESTIONNAIRE.PDF UPON APPROVAL AND FEE PAYMENT, PLEASE |
| | UPLOAD THE RECEIPT TO YOUR PROJECT OR EMAIL IT TO |
| | [email protected] . |
| | PALM BEACH COUNTY IMPACT FEE OFFICE IS LOCATED AT 2300 |
| | N. JOG RD. ROOM?S 2W01-2W14 WEST PALM BEACH, FL. |
| | |
| | 12) A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW |
| | COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION |
| | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE |
| | THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR |
| | PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | JAMES A. WITMER BN, PX, SFP, CBO |
| | SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | BUILDING DIVISION / DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | 401 CLEMATIS ST. WEST PALM BEACH. FL 33402 |
| | TEL: 561-805-6717 |
| | FAX: 561-805-6676 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |