|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 18110051
| Plan Review Stops For Permit 18110051 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2018-11-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-11-28 |
Time |
19:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-11-28 |
Time |
18:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-11-28 18:55:08 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) RE-ROOF SECOND BUILDING REVIEW | | | COMMENTS | | | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS | | | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | | 1) THIS ONE STORY STRUCTURE IS LOCATED IN EXPOSURE | | | CATEGORY D. THE REQUIRED UPLIFT PRESSURE FOR THE FLAT | | | ROOF IS -116 PSF FOR ROOF ZONE 3 FOR A STRUCTURE WITH A | | | 15 FT. MEAN ROOF HEIGHT EXCEEDS THE -97.5 PSF FOR | | | SYSTEM NO. W-19 THAT WAS SELECTED FROM FL16027-R2. | | | SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS THAT MEET THE REQUIRED UPLIFT. | | | FBC-R301.2.1 | | | | | | RESPONSE: | | | NEW FLAT ROOF ASSEMBLY W-5 DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN | | | PRESSURES FOR ALL ROOF ZONES EITHER. DESIGN PRESSURES | | | ARE EVEN LOWER THAN THE ASSEMBLY SELECTED ON THE FIRST | | | SUBMITTAL. NEED TO SELECT ASSEMBLY THAT MEETS THE | | | DESIGN PRESSURES FOR ALL ROOF ZONES. NOTE: BONDED | | | ASSEMBLIES DON'T ALLOW RATIONAL ANALYSIS (RAS 117 | | | CALCULATIONS FOR NAIL ENHANCEMENT). SEE NOTE #10 ON | | | PAGE 2 OF 26 OF PRODUCT APPROVAL FL16027-R2 SUBMITTED. | | | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | | 2) THE UNDERLAYMENT AND CAP SHEET SPECIFIED ON PAGE 4 | | | OF ROOFING FORM 100, DO NOT MATCH THE ONES THAT WERE | | | MARKED ON THE PRODUCT APPROVAL FL16027. PLEASE CORRECT. | | | FBC 107.2.1 | | | | | | RESPONSE: | | | INFORMATION SUBMITTED IS NOT CLEAR. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY | | | AMENDMENTS. | | | WHAT'S CAP SHEET SA-P? AND WHAT'S OTHER UNDERLAYMENT | | | SA-V ?. | | | | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | BUILDING DIVISION | | | (561)805-6712 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-11-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-11-16 |
Time |
18:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-11-16 |
Time |
18:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-11-16 19:17:51 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) RE-ROOF SECOND BUILDING REVIEW | | | COMMENTS | | | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS | | | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | | 1) THIS ONE STORY STRUCTURE IS LOCATED IN EXPOSURE | | | CATEGORY D. THE REQUIRED UPLIFT PRESSURE FOR THE FLAT | | | ROOF IS -116 PSF FOR ROOF ZONE 3 FOR A STRUCTURE WITH A | | | 15 FT. MEAN ROOF HEIGHT EXCEEDS THE -97.5 PSF FOR | | | SYSTEM NO. W-19 THAT WAS SELECTED FROM FL16027-R2. | | | SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS THAT MEET THE REQUIRED UPLIFT. | | | FBC-R301.2.1 | | | | | | RESPONSE: | | | NEW FLAT ROOF ASSEMBLY W-5 DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN | | | PRESSURES FOR ALL ROOF ZONES EITHER. DESIGN PRESSURES | | | ARE EVEN LOWER THAN THE ASSEMBLY SELECTED ON THE FIRST | | | SUBMITTAL. NEED TO SELECT ASSEMBLY THAT MEETS THE | | | DESIGN PRESSURES FOR ALL ROOF ZONES. NOTE: BONDED | | | ASSEMBLIES DON'T ALLOW RATIONAL ANALYSIS (RAS 117 | | | CALCULATIONS FOR NAIL ENHANCEMENT). SEE NOTE #10 ON | | | PAGE 2 OF 26 OF PRODUCT APPROVAL FL16027-R2 SUBMITTED. | | | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | | 2) THE UNDERLAYMENT AND CAP SHEET SPECIFIED ON PAGE 4 | | | OF ROOFING FORM 100, DO NOT MATCH THE ONES THAT WERE | | | MARKED ON THE PRODUCT APPROVAL FL16027. PLEASE CORRECT. | | | FBC 107.2.1 | | | | | | RESPONSE: | | | INFORMATION SUBMITTED IS NOT CLEAR. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY | | | AMENDMENTS. | | | WHAT'S CAP SHEET SA-P? AND WHAT'S OTHER UNDERLAYMENT | | | SA-V ?. | | | | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | BUILDING DIVISION | | | (561)805-6712 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-11-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2018-11-01 |
Time |
16:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2018-11-01 |
Time |
15:50 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2018-11-01 16:26:07 | PLAN | | | REVIEW COMMENTS | | | | | | 1ST REVIEW: FBC SIXTH EDITION (2017) | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561) 805-6714 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | DENIED BY BUILDING | | | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: | | | | | | 1) THIS ONE STORY STRUCTURE IS LOCATED IN EXPOSURE | | | CATEGORY D. THE REQUIRED UPLIFT PRESSURE FOR THE FLAT | | | ROOF OF -116 PSF FOR ROOF ZONE 3 FOR A STRUCTURE WITH A | | | 15 FT. MEAN ROOF HEIGHT EXCEEDS THE -97.5 PSF FOR | | | SYSTEM NO. W-19 THAT WAS SELECTED FROM FL16027-R2. | | | SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS THAT MEET THE REQUIRED UPLIFT. | | | FBC-R301.2.1 | | | | | | 2) THE UNDERLAYMENT AND CAP SHEET SPECIFIED ON PAGE 4 | | | OF ROOFING FORM 100, DO NOT MATCH THE ONES THAT WERE | | | MARKED ON THE PRODUCT APPROVAL FL16027. PLEASE CORRECT. | | | FBC 107.2.1 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2018-11-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-11-28 |
Time |
19:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-11-26 |
Time |
16:33 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2018-11-27 16:33:43 | RESUB ROUTED TO JGOMEZ |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2018-11-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-11-16 |
Time |
19:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-11-15 |
Time |
09:16 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2018-11-16 09:16:56 | RESUB ROUTED TO RMCDOUGAL |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |
|
