 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 18100648
| Plan Review Stops For Permit 18100648 |
| Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2019-10-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2019-10-21 |
Time |
18:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2019-10-21 |
Time |
18:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-10-21 18:35:37 | HELLO EVERYONE, | | | | | | IN THE ON GOING EFFORT TO BRING ADDRESSES TO A COMMON | | | STANDARD I AM UPDATING THE ADDRESS SEQUENCE AND UNIT | | | IDENTIFIERS FOR THE PROPERTY WITH THE PCN: | | | 74434321060240130. | | | | | | THERE ARE TWO STRUCTURES ON THIS PROPERTY AND THE | | | ADDRESS SEQUENCE IS CHANGING THE LOWER NUMBER OF 803 | | | FROM THE REAR TO THE FRONT WHICH WILL NOW BE THE | | | PRIMARY ADDRESS. | | | | | | FRONT: NEW ADDRESS OF 803 3RD ST CHANGED FROM THE OLD | | | ADDRESS OF 805 3RD ST | | | REAR: NEW ADDRESS OF 805 3RD ST UNIT 1 CHANGED FROM THE | | | OLD ADDRESS OF 803 3RD ST UNIT 1. FIRST FLOOR | | | NEW ADDRESS OF 805 3RD ST UNIT 2 CHANGED FROM THE OLD | | | ADDRESS OF 803 ? 3RD ST UNIT 2. SECOND FLOOR | | | | | | I HAVE UPDATED THE WPB AND THE PBC EPZB ADDRESS | | | DATABASES. | | | | | | REGARDS | | | | | | MICHAEL ORIO | | | GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST | | | | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET ? WEST PALM BEACH ? FLORIDA 33401 | | | P: 561.494.1080 | WWW.WPB.ORG |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-02-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pvalenti |
Date |
2020-02-10 |
Time |
08:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pvalenti |
Date |
2020-02-10 |
Time |
06:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-02-10 08:56:13 | PETER E VALENTI | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6673 | | | | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 6TH EDITION (2017) | | | FBC B = FBC BUILDING | | | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING | | | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY | | | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION | | | FBC R = FBC RESIDENTIAL | | | FBC M = FBC MECHANICAL | | | | | | BUILDING REVIEW APPROVED WITH PROVISO: | | | | | | SEE THE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED SUBMITTALS FOR DETAILS | | | ON SIMPSON STRONG TIE ROOF CONNECTORS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2019-10-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2019-10-28 |
Time |
18:13 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2019-10-28 |
Time |
15:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-10-28 18:14:27 | | | | *****NOTE: | | | 01/15/2020 MEETING W/ SAMANTHA HILL, JORGE GONZALEZ | | | (ENG'R) AND DANIEL ACEVEDO (CONTR) TO GO OVER COMMENTS. | | | JG. | | | | | | | | | | | | RESIDENTIAL (R3) SIXTH BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS | | | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | 1- SHEET S-01: | | | PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ONE | | | HOUR FIRE RATED FLOOR ASSEMBLY SEPARATING DUPLEX A AND | | | B. | | | SEC. 801.3 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING AND SEC. R302.3 | | | FBC-RESIDENTIALL. | | | | | | RESPONSE: | | | REPEAT COMMENT (SIX TIMES). REVISED DRAWING SUBMITTED | | | THIS TIME ON SHEET S-01 DOESN'T PROVIDE ANY DETAIL OR | | | SPECIFICATIONS FOR AN APPROVED ONE HOUR FIRE RATED | | | FLOOR /CEILING ASSEMBLY COMPLYING WITH THE REQUIREMENTS | | | OF SEC. R302.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. THE PREVIOUS PLANS | | | SPECIFIED APPROVED ASSEMBLY NO L501 BUT IT WAS NOT | | | COORDINATED WITH THE BUILDING SECTION ON SAME SHEET. | | | THE COMMENT WAS FOR ENGINEER TO COORDINATE THE | | | INFORMATION. NOW ENGINEER PROVIDES A NEW DRAWING THAT | | | DOESN'T PROVIDE ANY ONE HOUR APPROVED FIRE RATED | | | ASSEMBLY. NEED TO PROVIDE DETAIL/SPECIFICATIONS FOR AN | | | APPROVED 1 HOUR FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLY THAT IS TESTED | | | IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E119 OR UL 263 AS REQUIRED BY | | | SEC. R302.3 FRBC-RESIDENTIAL. | | | | | | THIS PLAN REVIEW HAVE BEEN DENIED SIX TIMES FOR THIS | | | SAME ITEM. ENGINEER OF RECORD TO PAY FOUR TIMES THE | | | PLAN REVIEW FEE ($1630.72) AS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA | | | STATUTE 553.80(2)(B). | | | | | | ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS | | | FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B): | | | WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS | | | DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT NECESSARY, IN | | | ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING | | | CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT DESIGN DOCUMENTS | | | REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE TIMES FOR FAILURE TO | | | CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY | | | NOTED IN EACH REJECTION, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, | | | EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION, STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, | | | ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, | | | MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS SYSTEMS, OR OTHER | | | REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING | | | COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL | | | GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH | | | REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, | | | A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT OF THE PROPORTION OF THE | | | PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS REVIEW | | | | | | | | | 2- WINDOW REPLACEMENT: | | | A) CLEARLY SPECIFY TYPE AND SIZE OF EXISTING WINDOWS | | | AND TYPE AND SIZE OF PROPOSED WINDOWS TO VERIFY | | | COMPLIANCE WITH THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 702.5 | | | FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. | | | | | | RESPONSE: | | | REPEAT COMMENT (SIX TIMES). EGRESS NOTE ON SHEET A-01 | | | DOESN'T ADDRESS THE COMMENT. THIS NOTE DOESN'T ANSWER | | | WHAT IT WAS REQUESTED. PLEASE READ THE COMMENT AGAIN | | | AND PROVIDE THE REQUIRED INFORMATION. ALSO, IT LOOKS | | | LIKE THE CODE SECTION IS TAKING FROM ANOTHER CODE OTHER | | | THAN THE 2017 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. IN ADDITION, THE WINDOW | | | SIZES SHOWN ON THE PROPOSED WINDOW SCHEDULE DON'T | | | COMPLY. | | | | | | ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS | | | FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B): | | | WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS | | | DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT NECESSARY, IN | | | ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING | | | CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT DESIGN DOCUMENTS | | | REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE TIMES FOR FAILURE TO | | | CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY | | | NOTED IN EACH REJECTION, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, | | | EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION, STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, | | | ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, | | | MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS SYSTEMS, OR OTHER | | | REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING | | | COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL | | | GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH | | | REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, | | | A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT OF THE PROPORTION OF THE | | | PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS REVIEW | | | | | | | | | | | | 3- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY | | | FAC 61G20-3.001 FOR: | | | A) EXTERIOR DOORS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. NOTE: PROVIDE | | | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE THAT CORRESPOND TO | | | DRAWINGS MA-FL0211-17 SUBMITTED. | | | | | | RESPONSE: | | | REPEAT COMMENT (SIX TIMES). FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL | | | COVER PAGE WAS NOT PROVIDED. NEED TO PROVIDE COMPLETE | | | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL, INCLUDING THE FLORIDA PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL COVER PAGE THAT CORRESPONDS TO THE DRAWINGS | | | SUBMITTED. THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED | | | BECAUSE IT SHOWS IF PRODUCT IS APPROVED AND CURRENT | | | CODE IN EFFECT. | | | NOTE: IF THERE IS NOT CURRENT FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL, | | | THEN MANUFACTURER MAY APPLY FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | | 2 COPIES OF COMPLETE ENGINEERED PACKAGE WITH ORIGINAL | | | SEAL/SIGNATURE ALONG WITH APPLICATION FOR PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL WILL BE REQUIRED FOR BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | REVIEW/APPROVAL PROCESS. | | | | | | 4- RAFTER CONNECTION DETAIL ON SHEET S-01. ENGINEER TO | | | PROVIDE ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS SHOWING THAT THE | | | SPECIFIED CONNECTION IS ADEQUATE FOR THE SUPPORT OF | | | SECOND FLOOR JOISTS. ENGINEER TO SHOW THAT 1/4" X | | | 3-1/4" TAPCONS SPACED AT 24" O.C ARE ADEQUATE TO CARRY | | | ALL LIVE AND DEAD LOADS. SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY | | | AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | RESPONSE: | | | SCOPE OF WORK IS NO CLEAR NOW. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY | | | AMENDMENTS. NEW STRUCTURAL DRAWING S-01 SHOWS WHAT | | | LOOKS LIKE A SECOND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN (THERE IS NO | | | NAME FOR THIS PLAN). IN ADDITION IT DOESN'T SPECIFY | | | WHAT IS THE SCOPE OF WORK ON THIS PLAN. PREVIOUS FLOOR | | | FRAMING PLAN WAS FOR THE REPAIR ON ONE CORNER OF THE | | | FLOOR. NOW, THE SCOPE OF WORK IS NOT CLEAR. | | | ALSO, PREVIOUS SET OF PLANS SHOWED A ROOF FRAMING PLAN | | | FOR REPAIR AT ONE CORNER ALSO. THE STRUCTURAL PLAN | | | SUBMITTED (S-01) IS NOT CLEAR ON THE SCOPE OF WORK. | | | | | | ON THE OTHER HAND, WALL SECTIONS ON THE RIGHT HAND SIDE | | | OF THE SHEET SHOWS THE SECOND FLOOR CONCRETE BLOCK WALL | | | BEING SUPPORTED BY WOOD FLOOR JOISTS. THIS DOESN'T SEEM | | | TO BE RIGHT. ( MASONRY SHALL NOT BE SUPPORTED ON WOOD. | | | SEC. 2104.1.1 FBC-BUILDING). PREVIOUS DRAWINGS SHOWED A | | | CONTINUOUS CONCRETE BLOCK WALL ALL THE WAY UP TO THE | | | SECOND FLOOR. AND, FLOOR JOISTS WERE SUPPORTED ON | | | STRUCTURAL WOOD LEDGERS. CLARIFY/REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | ALSO, THE HURRICANE TIES (SIMPSON H3) SPECIFIED FOR THE | | | FIRST FLOOR FRAMING PLAN AND ROOF FRAMING PLAN ARE WOOD | | | TO WOOD CONNECTORS. ACCORDING TO WALL SECTIONS | | | SUBMITTED THERE ARE WOOD JOISTS ATTACHED TO THE | | | CONCRETE BLOCK WALL. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SPECIFY | | | CONNECTORS FOR MASONRY CONSTRUCTION. | | | AND, THERE IS NOT INFORMATION ABOUT THE ROOF VENTS. | | | PREVIOUS DRAWINGS SHOWED CONTINUATIONS ROOF VENTS. | | | | | | ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS | | | FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B): | | | WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS | | | DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT NECESSARY, IN | | | ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING | | | CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT DESIGN DOCUMENTS | | | REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE TIMES FOR FAILURE TO | | | CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY | | | NOTED IN EACH REJECTION, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, | | | EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION, STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, | | | ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, | | | MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS SYSTEMS, OR OTHER | | | REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING | | | COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL | | | GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH | | | REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, | | | A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT OF THE PROPORTION OF THE | | | PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS REVIEW | | | | | | | | | | | | 5- ALL PLANS SUBMITTED HAVE A COPY OF THE SEAL AND | | | SIGNATURE OF THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. NEED TO PROVIDE | | | PLANS WITH ORIGINAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE AS REQUIRED BY | | | 61G15-23.001 FAC. | | | | | | | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED | | | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. | | | ENGINEER OF RECORD TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS | | | REGARDING THE COMMENTS AND PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER | | | ADDRESSING EACH COMMENT TO AVOID ANY PLAN REVIEW FEES | | | AND TO HELP EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. | | | ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE INSERT CORRECTED PAGES INTO THE | | | SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE/VOID THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED | | | SHEETS. PLEASE DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS. SUBMIT OLD | | | DRAWINGS FOR REFERENCE. | | | | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | BUILDING DIVISION | | | (561)805-6712 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2019-10-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2019-10-21 |
Time |
18:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2019-10-21 |
Time |
17:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-10-21 18:31:45 | BUILDING REVIEW CAN NOT BE COMPLETED AT THIS TIME. | | | PLANS SUBMITTED ARE FOR THE MAIN HOUSE ONLY. THERE ARE | | | TWO STRUCTURES IN THIS PARCEL. IT WAS REQUESTED ON | | | 09/18/19 MEETING WITH CONTRACTOR AND OWNER TO HAVE A | | | SEPARATE PERMIT APPLICATION FOR EACH STRUCTURE. | | | | | | NOTE: | | | DRAWINGS SUBMITTED DON'T HAVE AN ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AS | | | REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA STATUES WHEN SUBMITTING | | | PLANS /DOCUMENTS FOR PUBLIC RECORDS. | | | | | | | | | | | | 09/18/19 MET WITH RONEN HAZAN (OWNER),DANIEL ACEVEDO | | | (CONTRACTOR), JOHN FRASCA (CODE ENFORCEMENT) TO GO OVER | | | COMMENTS. JG. | | | | | | | | | | | | RESIDENTIAL (R3) FIFTH BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS | | | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | NOTE: | | | ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS | | | FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B): | | | WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS | | | DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT NECESSARY, IN | | | ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING | | | CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT DESIGN DOCUMENTS | | | REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE TIMES FOR FAILURE TO | | | CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY | | | NOTED IN EACH REJECTION, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, | | | EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION, STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, | | | ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, | | | MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS SYSTEMS, OR OTHER | | | REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING | | | COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL | | | GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH | | | REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, | | | A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT OF THE PROPORTION OF THE | | | PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS REVIEW | | | | | | | | | 1- SHEET S-01: | | | PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ONE | | | HOUR FIRE RATED FLOOR ASSEMBLY SEPARATING DUPLEX A AND | | | B. | | | SEC. 801.3 EXISTING BUILDING AND SEC. R302.3 | | | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. | | | | | | RESPONSE: | | | REPEAT COMMENT. DETAIL FOR 1 HOUR FLOOR ASSEMBLY AND | | | INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE BUILDING SECTION FOR THE | | | FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLY ON SAME SHEET DON'T MATCH. | | | REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. | | | SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. THERE IS NO COORDINATION | | | BETWEEN 1 HOUR FLOOR ASSEMBLY NO L501 AND INFORMATION | | | SHOWN ON THE WALL SECTION ON SAME SHEET. | | | | | | PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAIL/SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE APPROVED | | | FLOOR /CEILING FIRE RATED ASSEMBLY. SPECIFY ALL | | | FINISHES, INCLUDING THE FINISH FLOOR. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY | | | AMENDMENTS. | | | ENGINEER IS NOT PROVIDING A COMPLETE DRAWING OF THE 1 | | | HOUR APPROVED FLOOR/CEILING FIRE RATED ASSEMBLY. | | | PROVIDE COMPLETE UL L501 APPROVED ASSEMBLY DETAIL THAT | | | MATCHES PROPOSED INSTALLATION. SPECIFY THICKNESS OF | | | MATERIALS, FASTENING SPECIFICATIONS, ETC. TYPICALLY | | | THIS IS DONE BY COPYING THE DETAILS FROM THE UL | | | WEBSITE. | | | | | | 2- WINDOW REPLACEMENT : | | | A) CLEARLY SPECIFY TYPE AND SIZE OF EXISTING WINDOWS | | | AND TYPE AND SIZE OF PROPOSED WINDOWS TO VERIFY | | | COMPLIANCE WITH THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 702.5 | | | FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. | | | | | | RESPONSE: | | | REPEAT COMMENT. EGRESS NOTE ON SHEET A-01 DOESN'T | | | ADDRESS THE COMMENT. THIS NOTE DOESN'T ANSWER WHAT IT | | | WAS REQUESTED. PLEASE READ THE COMMENT AGAIN AND | | | PROVIDE THE REQUIRED INFORMATION. ALSO, IT LOOKS LIKE | | | THE CODE SECTION IS TAKING FROM ANOTHER CODE OTHER THAN | | | THE 2017 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. IN ADDITION, THE WINDOW SIZES | | | SHOWN ON THE PROPOSED WINDOW SCHEDULE DON'T COMPLY. | | | | | | 3- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY | | | FAC 61G20-3.001 FOR: | | | A) EXTERIOR DOORS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. NOTE: PROVIDE | | | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE THAT CORRESPOND TO | | | DRAWINGS MA-FL0211-17 SUBMITTED. | | | | | | RESPONSE: | | | REPEAT COMMENT. FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE WAS | | | NOT PROVIDED. NEED TO PROVIDE COMPLETE FLORIDA PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL, INCLUDING THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER | | | PAGE THAT CORRESPONDS TO THE DRAWINGS SUBMITTED. THE | | | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED BECAUSE IT SHOWS | | | IF PRODUCT IS APPROVED AND CURRENT CODE IN EFFECT. | | | NOTE: IF THERE IS NOT CURRENT FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL, | | | THEN MANUFACTURER MAY APPLY FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | | 2 COPIES OF COMPLETE ENGINEERED PACKAGE WITH ORIGINAL | | | SEAL/SIGNATURE ALONG WITH APPLICATION FOR PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL WILL BE REQUIRED FOR BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | REVIEW/APPROVAL PROCESS. | | | | | | 4- RAFTER CONNECTION DETAIL ON SHEET S-01. ENGINEER TO | | | PROVIDE ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS SHOWING THAT THE | | | SPECIFIED CONNECTION IS ADEQUATE FOR THE SUPPORT OF | | | SECOND FLOOR JOISTS. ENGINEER TO SHOW THAT 1/4" X | | | 3-1/4" TAPCONS SPACED AT 24" O.C ARE ADEQUATE TO CARRY | | | ALL LIVE AND DEAD LOADS. SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY | | | AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | 5- SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED ON A SEPARATE LETTER BY THE | | | ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR THE REPAIR OF RAFTERS IN MAIN | | | HOUSE DON'T MATCH DETAILS SHOWN ON THE STRUCTURAL | | | DRAWINGS. ENGINEER TO COORDINATE AND PROVIDE ALL THE | | | SPECIFICATIONS ON THE STRUCTURAL PLANS TO AVOID | | | CONFLICTS. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED | | | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. | | | ENGINEER OF RECORD TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS | | | REGARDING THE COMMENTS AND PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER | | | ADDRESSING EACH COMMENT TO AVOID ANY PLAN REVIEW FEES | | | AND TO HELP EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. | | | ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE INSERT CORRECTED PAGES INTO THE | | | SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE/VOID THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED | | | SHEETS. PLEASE DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS. SUBMIT OLD | | | DRAWINGS FOR REFERENCE. | | | | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | BUILDING DIVISION | | | (561)805-6712 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2019-06-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2019-06-26 |
Time |
09:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2019-06-25 |
Time |
17:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-06-26 09:46:25 | 09/18/19 MET WITH RONEN HAZAN (OWNER),DANIEL ACEVEDO | | | (CONTRACTOR), JOHN FRASCA (CODE ENFORCEMENT) TO GO OVER | | | COMMENTS. JG. | | | | | | | | | | | | RESIDENTIAL (R3) FOURTH BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS | | | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | NOTE: | | | ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS | | | FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B): | | | WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS | | | DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT NECESSARY, IN | | | ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING | | | CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT DESIGN DOCUMENTS | | | REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE TIMES FOR FAILURE TO | | | CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY | | | NOTED IN EACH REJECTION, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, | | | EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION, STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, | | | ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, | | | MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS SYSTEMS, OR OTHER | | | REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING | | | COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL | | | GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH | | | REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, | | | A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT OF THE PROPORTION OF THE | | | PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS REVIEW | | | | | | | | | 1- SHEET S-01: | | | PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ONE | | | HOUR FIRE RATED FLOOR ASSEMBLY SEPARATING DUPLEX A AND | | | B. | | | SEC. 801.3 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING AND SEC. R302.3 | | | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. | | | | | | RESPONSE: | | | REPEAT COMMENT. DETAIL FOR 1 HOUR FLOOR ASSEMBLY AND | | | INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE BUILDING SECTION FOR THE | | | FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLY ON SAME SHEET DON'T MATCH. | | | REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. | | | SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. THERE IS NO COORDINATION | | | BETWEEN 1 HOUR FLOOR ASSEMBLY NO L501 AND INFORMATION | | | SHOWN ON THE WALL SECTION ON SAME SHEET. | | | | | | PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAIL/SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE APPROVED | | | FLOOR /CEILING FIRE RATED ASSEMBLY. SPECIFY ALL | | | FINISHES, INCLUDING THE FINISH FLOOR. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY | | | AMENDMENTS. | | | ENGINEER IS NOT PROVIDING A COMPLETE DRAWING OF THE 1 | | | HOUR APPROVED FLOOR/CEILING FIRE RATED ASSEMBLY. | | | PROVIDE COMPLETE UL L501 APPROVED ASSEMBLY DETAIL THAT | | | MATCHES PROPOSED INSTALLATION. SPECIFY THICKNESS OF | | | MATERIALS, FASTENING SPECIFICATIONS, ETC. TYPICALLY | | | THIS IS DONE BY COPYING THE DETAILS FROM THE UL | | | WEBSITE. | | | | | | 2- WINDOW REPLACEMENT : | | | A) CLEARLY SPECIFY TYPE AND SIZE OF EXISTING WINDOWS | | | AND TYPE AND SIZE OF PROPOSED WINDOWS TO VERIFY | | | COMPLIANCE WITH THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 702.5 | | | FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. | | | | | | RESPONSE: | | | REPEAT COMMENT. EGRESS NOTE ON SHEET A-01 DOESN'T | | | ADDRESS THE COMMENT. THIS NOTE DOESN'T ANSWER WHAT IT | | | WAS REQUESTED. PLEASE READ THE COMMENT AGAIN AND | | | PROVIDE THE REQUIRED INFORMATION. ALSO, IT LOOKS LIKE | | | THE CODE SECTION IS TAKING FROM ANOTHER CODE OTHER THAN | | | THE 2017 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. IN ADDITION, THE WINDOW SIZES | | | SHOWN ON THE PROPOSED WINDOW SCHEDULE DON'T COMPLY. | | | | | | 3- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY | | | FAC 61G20-3.001 FOR: | | | A) EXTERIOR DOORS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. NOTE: PROVIDE | | | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE THAT CORRESPOND TO | | | DRAWINGS MA-FL0211-17 SUBMITTEDD. | | | | | | RESPONSE: | | | REPEAT COMMENT. FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE WAS | | | NOT PROVIDED. NEED TO PROVIDE COMPLETE FLORIDA PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL, INCLUDING THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER | | | PAGE THAT CORRESPONDS TO THE DRAWINGS SUBMITTED. THE | | | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED BECAUSE IT SHOWS | | | IF PRODUCT IS APPROVED AND CURRENT CODE IN EFFECT. | | | NOTE: IF THERE IS NOT CURRENT FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL, | | | THEN MANUFACTURER MAY APPLY FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | | 2 COPIES OF COMPLETE ENGINEERED PACKAGE WITH ORIGINAL | | | SEAL/SIGNATURE ALONG WITH APPLICATION FOR PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL WILL BE REQUIRED FOR BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | REVIEW/APPROVAL PROCESS. | | | | | | 4- RAFTER CONNECTION DETAIL ON SHEET S-01. ENGINEER TO | | | PROVIDE ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS SHOWING THAT THE | | | SPECIFIED CONNECTION IS ADEQUATE FOR THE SUPPORT OF | | | SECOND FLOOR JOISTS. ENGINEER TO SHOW THAT 1/4" X | | | 3-1/4" TAPCONS SPACED AT 24" O.C ARE ADEQUATE TO CARRY | | | ALL LIVE AND DEAD LOADS. SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY | | | AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | 5- SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED ON A SEPARATE LETTER BY THE | | | ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR THE REPAIR OF RAFTERS IN MAIN | | | HOUSE DON'T MATCH DETAILS SHOWN ON THE STRUCTURAL | | | DRAWINGS. ENGINEER TO COORDINATE AND PROVIDE ALL THE | | | SPECIFICATIONS ON THE STRUCTURAL PLANS TO AVOID | | | CONFLICTS. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED | | | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. | | | ENGINEER OF RECORD TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS | | | REGARDING THE COMMENTS AND PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER | | | ADDRESSING EACH COMMENT TO AVOID ANY PLAN REVIEW FEES | | | AND TO HELP EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. | | | ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE INSERT CORRECTED PAGES INTO THE | | | SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE/VOID THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED | | | SHEETS. PLEASE DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS. SUBMIT OLD | | | DRAWINGS FOR REFERENCE. | | | | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | BUILDING DIVISION | | | (561)805-6712 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2019-05-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2019-05-10 |
Time |
16:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2019-05-09 |
Time |
18:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-05-09 18:27:22 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) THIRD BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS | | | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | NOTE: | | | ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS | | | FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B): | | | WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS | | | DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT NECESSARY, IN | | | ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING | | | CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT DESIGN DOCUMENTS | | | REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE TIMES FOR FAILURE TO | | | CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY | | | NOTED IN EACH REJECTION, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, | | | EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION, STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, | | | ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, | | | MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS SYSTEMS, OR OTHER | | | REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING | | | COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL | | | GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH | | | REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, | | | A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT OF THE PROPORTION OF THE | | | PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS REVIEW | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1- SHEET S-01: | | | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | | PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ONE | | | HOUR FIRE RATED FLOOR ASSEMBLY SEPARATING DUPLEX A AND | | | B. | | | SEC. 801.3 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING AND SEC. R302.3 | | | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. | | | | | | RESPONSE: | | | A) DETAIL FOR 1 HOUR FLOOR ASSEMBLY DESIGN NO. L501 | | | DON'T SEEM TO WORK. THIS ASSEMBLY REQUIRES 2X10 MIN. | | | WOOD JOISTS. PLANS SUBMITTED SHOW 2X8 WOOD JOISTS. | | | REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | B)DETAIL FOR 1 HOUR FLOOR ASSEMBLY AND INFORMATION | | | SHOWN ON THE BUILDING SECTION FOR THE FLOOR/CEILING | | | ASSEMBLY ON SAME SHEET DON'T MATCH. REVISE AS REQUIRED | | | TO MATCH. | | | SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | C) PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAIL/SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE | | | APPROVED FLOOR /CEILING FIRE RATED ASSEMBLY. SPECIFY | | | ALL FINISHES, INCLUDING THE FINISH FLOOR. SEC. 107.2.1 | | | CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | | | | 2- OK. | | | | | | 3- OK. | | | | | | 4- OK. | | | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | | 5- WINDOW REPLACEMENT : | | | CLEARLY SPECIFY TYPE AND SIZE OF EXISTING WINDOWS AND | | | TYPE AND SIZE OF PROPOSED WINDOWS TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 702.5 FBC-EXISTING | | | BUILDING. | | | NOTE: NEED TO VERIFY MANUFACTURER'S LARGEST STANDARD | | | SIZE WINDOW THAT WILL FIT WITHIN THE EXISTING FRAME OR | | | EXISTING ROUGH OPENING AND THAT WILL NOT REDUCE THE | | | EGRESS SIZE OPENING OF EXISTING WINDOW AS REQUIRED BY | | | SEC. 702.5. | | | | | | RESPONSE: | | | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT PROPERLY ADDRESSED. ENGINEER | | | RESPONSE LETTER STATES "EGRESS WINDOW NOTES AND DETAIL | | | ADDED TO SHEET A-01". BASED ON THE TYPE AND SIZE OF | | | WINDOWS SHOWN ON THE WINDOW/DOOR SCHEDULES ON SHEET | | | A-01, THE BEDROOM WINDOWS DON'T COMPLY WITH THE EGRESS | | | WINDOW NOTES PROVIDED. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO COMPLY. | | | | | | | | | 6- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY | | | FAC 61G20-3.001 FOR: | | | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | | A) EXTERIOR DOORS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. NOTE: PROVIDE | | | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE THAT CORRESPOND TO | | | DRAWINGS MA-FL0211-17 SUBMITTED. | | | | | | RESPONSE: | | | REPEAT COMMENT. FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE WAS | | | NOT PROVIDED. | | | | | | B) OK. | | | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | | C) FLAT ROOF NOA 16-0517.08. PROVIDE SIGNED AND SEALED | | | RAS 117 CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY GENERAL LIMITATION | | | #7 ON LAST PAGE OF NOA TO MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES AT | | | ALL ROOF ZONES. | | | SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. | | | | | | RESPONSE: | | | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 7- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING | | | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS | | | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | RESPONSE: | | | REPEAT COMMENT. | | | | | | | | | 8- PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR | | | REVISED MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW | | | COMMENTS. | | | ENGINEER OF RECORD TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS | | | REGARDING THE COMMENTS AND PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER | | | ADDRESSING EACH COMMENT TO AVOID ANY PLAN REVIEW FEES | | | AND TO HELP EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. | | | ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE INSERT CORRECTED PAGES INTO THE | | | SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE/VOID THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED | | | SHEETS. PLEASE DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS. SUBMIT OLD | | | DRAWINGS FOR REFERENCE. | | | | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | BUILDING DIVISION | | | (561)805-6712 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2019-02-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2019-02-21 |
Time |
18:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2019-02-21 |
Time |
13:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-02-21 18:12:18 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) SECOND BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS | | | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | NOTE: | | | ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS | | | FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B): | | | WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS | | | DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT NECESSARY, IN | | | ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING | | | CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT DESIGN DOCUMENTS | | | REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE TIMES FOR FAILURE TO | | | CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY | | | NOTED IN EACH REJECTION, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, | | | EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION, STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, | | | ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, | | | MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS SYSTEMS, OR OTHER | | | REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING | | | COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL | | | GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH | | | REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, | | | A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT OF THE PROPORTION OF THE | | | PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS REVIEW | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1- SHEET S-01: | | | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | | A) PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ONE | | | HOUR FIRE RATED FLOOR ASSEMBLY SEPARATING DUPLEX A AND | | | B. | | | SEC. 801.3 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING AND SEC. R302.3 | | | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. | | | | | | RESPONSE: | | | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | | B) CLARIFY WHY PROVIDING ONE HOUR FIRE RATED DEMISING | | | PARTITION ON THESE SHEET. THERE ARE NO DEMISING | | | PARTITIONS BETWEEN DWELLING UNITS. THE REQUIRED FIRE | | | RATING SEPARATION IS LOCATED ON THE FLOOR/CEILING | | | ASSEMBLY. COORDINATE WITH ITEM #1(A) ABOVE. PROVIDE | | | WALL DETAIL/SPECIFICATIONS THAT SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH | | | THE FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLY PENETRATIONS AS REQUIRED BY | | | SEC. R302.4 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. | | | | | | RESPONSE: | | | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT. | | | 2- ROOF TRUSS REPAIR DETAILS ON SHEET S-02 ARE | | | INCOMPLETE. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | A)SPECIFY NAIL TYPE AND HOW LONG ARE THE 2X4'S THAT ARE | | | SISTERED TO THE TRUSSES. | | | | | | RESPONSE: | | | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | | B) SPECIFY WHICH CONNECTOR IS GOING TO BE USED FOR THE | | | ROOF TO WALL CONNECTIONS. | | | | | | RESPONSE: | | | REPEAT COMMENT. DETAILS ARE KEYED WITH SOME CONNECTORS, | | | BUT THERE IS NOT CONNECTOR SCHEDULE. REVISE AS | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | C) NEW SHEET S-02 WAS NOT SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE | | | ENGINEER OF RECORD AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 471. F.S. | | | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | | 3- FLAT ROOF REPAIR DETAIL ON SHEET S-02 IS NOT CLEAR | | | AND DOESN'T MATCH FRAMING PLAN SHOWN ON SAME SHEET. | | | REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. ALSO, WHERE IS DETAIL 3 | | | S-01? SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | RESPONSE: | | | A)REPEAT COMMENT. THIS DETAIL WAS REDUCED AND PLACED | | | UNDER THE ROOF TRUSS REPAIR DETAIL BOX BELOW. NOW THERE | | | IS MORE CONFUSION OF WHAT DETAIL APPLIES TO. ALSO, IT' | | | TOO SMALL AND IS NOT LEGIBLE. REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS ANS SPECIFICATIONS THAT APPLY | | | TO THIS JOB. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | NEW COMMENT: | | | B) NEW FLAT ROOF SECTION DETAIL DOESN'T MATCH FLAT ROOF | | | PLAN. AND, (1)ROOF SHEATHING NAILING SPECIFICATIONS IS | | | NOT CLEAR. (2)PLYWOOD PANEL SIZE AND NAILING PATTERN | | | DON'T SEEM TO MATCH LOCATION OF ROOF STRUCTURAL FRAMING | | | MEMBERS. (3)SPECIFY ROOF SHEATHING NAIL TYPE. | | | (4)CLARIFY HOW 4" X 20" @ 4' ROOF VENTS WILL PROVIDE | | | CROSS VENTILATION ON A FLAT ROOF IF THERE IS NOT AIR | | | SPACE IN BETWEEN THE ROOFING JOISTS TO ALLOW FOR CROSS | | | VENTILATION?. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | | 4- DOORS AND WINDOWS CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN | | | ON SHEET A-01 ARE THE SAME FOR ALL OPENINGS. DESIGN | | | PRESSURES SEEM TOO LOW FOR SOME OPENINGS. BASED ON THE | | | ACTUAL OPENING EFFECTIVE AREA, WALL ZONE AND MEAN ROOF | | | HEIGHT. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL DESIGN PRESSURES FOR EACH | | | OPENING OR PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR WORST CASED | | | SCENARIO THAT WILL COVER ALL OPENINGS. SEC. R301.1 | | | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. | | | | | | RESPONSE: | | | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 4(A)- REVISED SHEET A-01 WAS NOT SIGNED AND SEALED BY | | | THE ENGINEER OF RECORD AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 471. F.S. | | | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | | 5- WINDOW REPLACEMENT : | | | A)CLEARLY SPECIFY TYPE AND SIZE OF EXISTING WINDOWS AND | | | TYPE AND SIZE OF PROPOSED WINDOWS TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 702.5 FBC-EXISTING | | | BUILDING. | | | NOTE: NEED TO VERIFY MANUFACTURER'S LARGEST STANDARD | | | SIZE WINDOW THAT WILL FIT WITHIN THE EXISTING FRAME OR | | | EXISTING ROUGH OPENING AND THAT WILL NOT REDUCE THE | | | EGRESS SIZE OPENING OF EXISTING WINDOW AS REQUIRED BY | | | SEC. 702.5. | | | | | | RESPONSE: | | | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | | | | B) OK. | | | | | | 6- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY | | | FAC 61G20-3.001 FOR: | | | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | | A) EXTERIOR DOORS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. NOTE: PROVIDE | | | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE THAT CORRESPOND TO | | | DRAWINGS MA-FL0211-17 SUBMITTED. | | | | | | RESPONSE: | | | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | | B) WINDOW MULLIONS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. REQUIRED: CLEARLY | | | SPECIFY MULLION SIZE TO BE USED TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURES. | | | | | | RESPONSE: | | | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | | C) FLAT ROOF NOA 16-0517.08. PROVIDE SIGNED AND SEALED | | | RAS 117 CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY GENERAL LIMITATION | | | #7 ON LAST PAGE OF NOA TO MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES AT | | | ALL ROOF ZONES. | | | SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. | | | | | | RESPONSE: | | | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 7- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING | | | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS | | | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS | | | | | | | | | 8- PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR | | | REVISED MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW | | | COMMENTS. | | | ENGINEER OF RECORD TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS | | | REGARDING THE COMMENTS AND PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER | | | ADDRESSING EACH COMMENT TO AVOID ANY PLAN REVIEW FEES | | | AND TO HELP EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. | | | ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE INSERT CORRECTED PAGES INTO THE | | | SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE/VOID THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED | | | SHEETS. PLEASE DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS. SUBMIT OLD | | | DRAWINGS FOR REFERENCE. | | | | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | BUILDING DIVISION | | | (561)805-6712 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-11-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-11-27 |
Time |
10:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-11-27 |
Time |
10:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-11-27 10:47:59 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS | | | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | NOTE: SEC. 801.3 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. ALL NEW | | | CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, SYSTEMS, AND SPACES | | | SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FLORIDA | | | BUILDING CODE, BUILDING. | | | | | | 1- SHEET S-01: | | | A) PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ONE | | | HOUR FIRE RATED FLOOR ASSEMBLY SEPARATING DUPLEX A AND | | | B. | | | SEC. 801.3 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING AND SEC. R302.3 | | | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. | | | | | | B) CLARIFY WHY PROVIDING ONE HOUR FIRE RATED DEMISING | | | PARTITION ON THESE SHEET. THERE ARE NO DEMISING | | | PARTITIONS BETWEEN DWELLING UNITS. THE REQUIRED FIRE | | | RATING SEPARATION IS LOCATED ON THE FLOOR/CEILING | | | ASSEMBLY. COORDINATE WITH ITEM #1(A) ABOVE. PROVIDE | | | WALL DETAIL/SPECIFICATIONS THAT SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH | | | THE FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLY PENETRATIONS AS REQUIRED BY | | | SEC. R302.4 FBC_RESIDENTIAL. | | | | | | 2- ROOF TRUSS REPAIR DETAILS ON SHEET S-02 ARE | | | INCOMPLETE. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | A)SPECIFY NAIL TYPE AND HOW LONG ARE THE 2X4'S THAT ARE | | | SISTERED TO THE TRUSSES. | | | B) SPECIFY WHICH CONNECTOR IS GOING TO BE USED FOR THE | | | ROOF TO WALL CONNECTION. | | | | | | 3- FLAT ROOF REPAIR DETAIL ON SHEET S-02 IS NOT CLEAR | | | AND DOESN'T MATCH FRAMING PLAN SHOWN ON SAME SHEET. | | | REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. ALSO, WHERE IS DETAIL 3 | | | S-01? SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | 4- DOORS AND WINDOWS CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN | | | ON SHEET A-01 ARE THE SAME FOR ALL OPENINGS. DESIGN | | | PRESSURES SEEM TOO LOW FOR SOME OPENINGS. BASED ON THE | | | ACTUAL OPENING EFFECTIVE AREA, WALL ZONE AND MEAN ROOF | | | HEIGHT. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL DESIGN PRESSURES FOR EACH | | | OPENING OR PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR WORST CASED | | | SCENARIO THAT WILL COVER ALL OPENINGS. | | | SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. | | | | | | 5- WINDOW REPLACEMENT : | | | A)CLEARLY SPECIFY TYPE AND SIZE OF EXISTING WINDOWS AND | | | TYPE AND SIZE OF PROPOSED WINDOWS TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 702.5 FBC-EXISTING | | | BUILDING. | | | NOTE: NEED TO VERIFY MANUFACTURER'S LARGEST STANDARD | | | SIZE WINDOW THAT WILL FIT WITHIN THE EXISTING FRAME OR | | | EXISTING ROUGH OPENING AND THAT WILL NOT REDUCE THE | | | EGRESS SIZE OPENING OF EXISTING WINDOW AS REQUIRED BY | | | SEC. 702.5. | | | | | | B) SECOND FLOOR WINDOW OPENING CONTROL DEVICES: WINDOW | | | OPENING CONTROL DEVICES IN WINDOW REPLACEMENT ARE | | | REQUIRED WHEN THE TOP SILL OF THE WINDOW OPENING IS AT | | | A HEIGHT LESS THAN 24 INCHES (610 MM) ABOVE THE | | | FINISHED FLOOR. CLEARLY SPECIFY IF THERE ARE ANY | | | WINDOWS WHERE THE WINDOW SILL IS LESS THAN 24" ABOVE | | | THE FINISH FLOOR. | | | SEC. 702.4 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. | | | | | | 6- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY | | | FAC 61G20-3.001 FOR: | | | (NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS A DEFERRED | | | SUBMITTAL) | | | | | | A) EXTERIOR DOORS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. NOTE: PROVIDE | | | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE THAT CORRESPOND TO | | | DRAWINGS MA-FL0211-17 SUBMITTED. | | | | | | B) WINDOW MULLIONS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. REQUIRED: CLEARLY | | | SPECIFY MULLION SIZE TO BE USED TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURES. | | | | | | C) FLAT ROOF NOA 16-0517.08. PROVIDE SIGNED AND SEALED | | | RAS 117 CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY GENERAL LIMITATION | | | #7 ON LAST PAGE OF NOA TO MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES AT | | | ALL ROOF ZONES. | | | SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED | | | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY | | | RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. PLEASE, ADDITIONALLY, INSERT | | | CORRECTED PAGES INTO TO SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE/VOID THE | | | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS. | | | PLEASE DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS. SUBMIT OLD DRAWINGS | | | FOR REFERENCE. | | | | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | BUILDING DIVISION | | | (561)805-6712 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | ************NOTE: | | | SEE E-MAIL FROM JOHN FRASCA REGARDING WORK WITHOUT | | | PERMITS DATED 12/19/18. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-02-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jpearson |
Date |
2020-02-24 |
Time |
13:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jpearson |
Date |
2020-02-24 |
Time |
11:03 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2019-11-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jpearson |
Date |
2019-11-12 |
Time |
13:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jpearson |
Date |
2019-11-12 |
Time |
13:19 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2019-11-12 13:18:41 | CODES IN EFFECT: | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2017 6TH EDITION | | | WPB FBC = WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC 2017 | | | 6TH ED, CHAPTER 1. | | | FBC EC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ENERGY CONSERVATION 2017 | | | 6TH EDITION | | | FBC EX = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE EXISTING BUILDING 2017 | | | 6TH EDITION | | | FBC RE = FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE 2017 6TH EDITION | | | NEC = NFPA 70 2014 EDITION, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE | | | FS = FLORIDA STATUTES | | | FAC = FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | | | | ELECTRICAL REVIEW STATUS: DENIED, SEE COMMENTS BELOW. | | | | | | PREVIOUS COMMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED | | | SATISFACTORILY ARE MARKED AS CORRECTED. PREVIOUS | | | COMMENTS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN ADDRESSED SATISFACTORILY | | | HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS IN PARENTHESES. ANY NEW | | | COMMENTS WILL BE LISTED AFTER PREVIOUS COMMENTS. | | | | | | 1. CORRECTED. | | | 2. SMOKE ALARMS MUST BE INSTALLED AT LEAST 3 FEET FROM | | | BATHROOM DOOR, 3 FEET FROM CEILING FANS, AND 3 FEET | | | FROM ANY MECHANICAL DUCT. PROVIDE CORRECTIONS. FBC RE | | | R314.3(4), NFPA 72:29.8.3.4 (SMOKE ALARM NOT PERMITTED | | | IN BATHROOM, ALL OTHER LOCATIONS NEED TO BE CORRECTED.) | | | 3. PROVIDE GFCI PROTECTED RECEPTACLE OUTLET FOR | | | SERVICING OF A/C EQUIPMENT WITHIN 25 FEET OF THE | | | EQUIPMENT PER CODE. NEC 210.63; FBC RE E3901.12 (NOT | | | PROVIDED.) | | | | | | END OF COMMENTS. | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED | | | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. WHEN | | | RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY | | | RESUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, INSERT CORRECTED PAGES | | | INTO THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE THE PREVIOUSLY | | | REVIEWED SHEETS. ONE COPY OF THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED | | | SHEETS SHOULD REMAIN IN PACKAGE AND BE MARKED OLD | | | SHEETS. | | | | | | SINCERELY, | | | | | | JOHN PEARSON | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6746 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2019-10-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jpearson |
Date |
2019-10-18 |
Time |
07:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jpearson |
Date |
2019-10-18 |
Time |
07:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-10-18 07:54:38 | CODES IN EFFECT: | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2017 6TH EDITION | | | WPB FBC = WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC 2017 | | | 6TH ED, CHAPTER 1. | | | FBC EC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ENERGY CONSERVATION 2017 | | | 6TH EDITION | | | FBC EX = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE EXISTING BUILDING 2017 | | | 6TH EDITION | | | FBC RE = FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE 2017 6TH EDITION | | | NEC = NFPA 70 2014 EDITION, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE | | | FS = FLORIDA STATUTES | | | FAC = FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | | | | ELECTRICAL REVIEW STATUS: DENIED, SEE COMMENTS BELOW. | | | | | | 1. NEW PLAN SUBMISSION IS MISSING SHEET E-02. PROVIDE | | | FULL SET OF PLANS FOR REVIEW. WPB FBC 107.2.1 | | | 2. SMOKE ALARMS MUST BE INSTALLED AT LEAST 3 FEET FROM | | | BATHROOM DOOR, 3 FEET FROM CEILING FANS, AND 3 FEET | | | FROM ANY MECHANICAL DUCT. PROVIDE CORRECTIONS. FBC RE | | | R314.3(4), NFPA 72:29.8.3.4 | | | 3. PROVIDE GFCI PROTECTED RECEPTACLE OUTLET FOR | | | SERVICING OF A/C EQUIPMENT WITHIN 25 FEET OF THE | | | EQUIPMENT PER CODE. NEC 210.63; FBC RE E3901.12 | | | | | | END OF COMMENTS. | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED | | | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. WHEN | | | RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY | | | RESUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, INSERT CORRECTED PAGES | | | INTO THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE THE PREVIOUSLY | | | REVIEWED SHEETS. ONE COPY OF THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED | | | SHEETS SHOULD REMAIN IN PACKAGE AND BE MARKED OLD | | | SHEETS. | | | | | | SINCERELY, | | | | | | JOHN PEARSON | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6746 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2019-10-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jpearson |
Date |
2018-11-19 |
Time |
12:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jpearson |
Date |
2018-11-19 |
Time |
08:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-10-18 07:52:06 | CHANGES STATUS TO REFLECT FAIL DUE TO 10-18-19 REVIEW. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
HIST |
HISTORICAL |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-02-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
fmittner |
Date |
2020-02-10 |
Time |
15:13 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
fmittner |
Date |
2020-02-10 |
Time |
15:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
HIST |
HISTORICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2019-11-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
fmittner |
Date |
2019-11-13 |
Time |
13:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
fmittner |
Date |
2019-11-13 |
Time |
13:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
HIST |
HISTORICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2019-10-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
fmittner |
Date |
2019-10-11 |
Time |
12:13 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
fmittner |
Date |
2019-10-11 |
Time |
12:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
HIST |
HISTORICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2018-11-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
fmittner |
Date |
2018-11-14 |
Time |
08:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
fmittner |
Date |
2018-11-14 |
Time |
08:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
N |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
2020-02-24 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2020-02-03 |
Time |
13:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-02-21 16:23:56 | ROUTED FROM ZONING TO PERMIT LIBRARIAN 2/24/20 EL | | 2020-02-04 13:27:48 | R31 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2019-11-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2019-11-19 |
Time |
06:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2019-10-24 |
Time |
13:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-11-18 16:02:53 | ROUTED FROM ZONING TO HISTORIC EL | | 2019-11-12 12:56:54 | TO JP DESK | | | | | 2019-11-07 14:54:34 | ROUTED TO DESK OF SHILL PER HER REQUEST ALONG WITH | | | #19101417 | | 2019-10-28 13:48:50 | R21 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2019-10-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2019-10-21 |
Time |
19:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2019-10-04 |
Time |
14:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-10-18 16:37:01 | TO HM DESK | | | | | 2019-10-10 16:26:28 | NEW COMMENTS FROM ZONING | | | | | | ROUTED FROM ZONING TO PERMIT LIBRARIAN | | | EL | | 2019-10-07 14:59:56 | R32 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2019-06-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2019-06-26 |
Time |
09:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2019-06-20 |
Time |
14:58 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2019-06-20 14:58:36 | RESUB ROUTED TO JGOMEZ |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2019-05-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2019-05-10 |
Time |
16:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2019-04-25 |
Time |
15:48 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2019-05-02 11:36:09 | ROUTED FROM ZONING TO PERMIT LIBRARIAN 5/2/19 EL | | | | | 2019-04-26 15:48:13 | RESUB ROUTED TO ZONING INBOX |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2019-02-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2019-02-21 |
Time |
18:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2019-02-05 |
Time |
14:06 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2019-02-13 16:48:00 | ROUTED FROM ZONING TO PERMIT LIBRARIAN 2/13/2019 EL | | 2019-02-06 14:06:26 | RESUB ROUTED TO ZONING INBOX |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2018-11-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jesmith |
Date |
2018-11-29 |
Time |
12:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jesmith |
Date |
2018-11-29 |
Time |
12:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-11-14 10:09:57 | R32 | | 2018-10-23 16:26:43 | ROUTED FROM ZONING (EL) TO HISTORIC (FM) 10/23/18 | | 2018-10-16 11:14:02 | LIBRARY |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-02-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pvalenti |
Date |
2020-02-10 |
Time |
08:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pvalenti |
Date |
2020-02-10 |
Time |
06:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2019-11-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cmontell |
Date |
2019-11-12 |
Time |
14:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cmontell |
Date |
2019-11-12 |
Time |
14:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2019-10-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cmontell |
Date |
2019-10-21 |
Time |
06:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cmontell |
Date |
2019-10-21 |
Time |
06:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2018-11-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cmontell |
Date |
2018-11-15 |
Time |
13:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cmontell |
Date |
2018-11-15 |
Time |
13:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2019-11-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jesmith |
Date |
2019-11-07 |
Time |
14:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jesmith |
Date |
2019-11-07 |
Time |
14:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-11-07 14:39:14 | 18100648 805 3RD ST | | | PLUMBING COMMENTS: APPROVED | | | ALL WORK PER STATE AND CITY CODES SUBJECT TO FIELD | | | INSPECTOR'S APPROVAL | | | SCOPE OF WORK IS LIMITED TO CHANGE OUT OF BATH AND | | | KITCHEN FIXTURES ONLY |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2019-10-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2019-10-17 |
Time |
08:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2019-10-17 |
Time |
08:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2018-11-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jesmith |
Date |
2018-11-29 |
Time |
12:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jesmith |
Date |
2018-11-29 |
Time |
12:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-11-29 12:46:15 | APPROVED | | | PLUMBING PROVISO | | | 1. ALL WORK PER CITY CODES SUBJECT TO FIELD INSPECTOR'S | | | APPROVAL | | | 2. SCOPE OF WORK IS LIMITED TO CHANGE OUT OF BATH AND | | | KITCHEN FIXTURES ONLY. CONNECT TO EXISTING PLUMBING | | | CONNECTIONS. | | | 3. SHOWER FLOOR(S) AS DETAILED ON PLAN PAGE A-04 | | | 4. TUB/SHOWER CONTROL VALVE(S) SHALL BE PRESSURE | | | BALANCED PB, THERMOSTATIC MIXING (TM) OR COMBINATION | | | PB/TM VALVE TYPES WITH HIGH TEMPERATURE LIMITING STOP. | | | FBC RES P2708.4 | | | 5. PROVIDE WATER HAMMER ARRESTORS AT WATER SUPPLIES TO | | | NEW ICE LINE AND NEW DISHWASHER. FBC RES P2903.5 | | | | | | JERALD SMITH | | | PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | EMAIL [email protected] | | | PHONE 561-805-6715 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-02-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pvalenti |
Date |
2020-02-10 |
Time |
08:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pvalenti |
Date |
2020-02-10 |
Time |
08:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2019-11-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2019-11-19 |
Time |
17:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2019-11-19 |
Time |
17:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-11-19 17:55:47 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | 1. THE PLANS SUBMITTED HAVE A PHOTOCOPY SIGNATURE. | | | FS471, ORIGINAL REQUIRED. A MEETING WITH THE DESIGN | | | PROFESSIONAL IS REQUESTED; HE CAN SIGN THE PLANS AT | | | THAT TIME, OR PROVIDE ORIGINALS WHEN RESUBMITTING. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-02-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
elevesqu |
Date |
2020-02-21 |
Time |
16:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
elevesqu |
Date |
2020-02-21 |
Time |
16:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-02-21 16:23:39 | PER EMAIL FROM RAY CARANCI TO RONEN HAZAN OF YAKUT TEAM | | | SENT ON 2/21/2020 : | | | HOLD IS PUT ON PERMIT FOR CO UNTIL LANDSCAPE PERMIT IS | | | SUBMITTED AND APPROVED | | | | | | LIZ LEVESQUE, URBAN DESIGN PLANNER | | | [email protected] | | | 561 822 1426 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2019-11-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
elevesqu |
Date |
2019-11-18 |
Time |
15:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
elevesqu |
Date |
2019-11-18 |
Time |
15:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-11-18 15:20:36 | REPEAT COMMENT: | | | | | | NEW COMMENTS AS PLANS HAVE CHANGED AND IT HAVE BEEN SO | | | LONG SINCE LAST SUMITTAL: | | | | | | | | | STAFF HAS RECOGNIZED THAT THE PROPERTY MUST MEET | | | ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE CRITERIA. PERMITS FOR SINGLE | | | FAMILY RESIDENCES, WHERE THE PERMIT VALUE IS OVER 50% | | | OF THE IMPROVED LAND VALUE (PER PAPA), MUST BE ABLE TO | | | SHOW THAT THEY ARE MEETING THE CRITERIA FOR LANDSCAPING | | | FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES. THIS PERMIT VALUE MEETS | | | THIS REQUIREMENT. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION TO RAY | | | CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER: | | | PROVIDE A LIST OF THE NUMBER AND SPECIES OF TREES ON | | | SITE | | | PROVIDE A LIST OF THE AMOUNT (LENGTH) AND SPECIES OF | | | SHRUBS ON SITE | | | | | | IF CURRENT LANDSCAPING DOES NOT MEET CURRENT CODE, A | | | LANDSCAPE PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED. ZONING CANNOT PASS | | | PERMIT UNTIL IT IS VERIFIED THAT THE SITE MEETS | | | LANDSCAPE CODE, OR UNTIL A LANDSCAPE PERMIT IS SUMITTED | | | (IF NEEDED) | | | | | | LANDSCAPE CODE FOR SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS IS AS | | | FOLLOWS: | | | | | | (2)GENERAL LANDSCAPING STANDARDS FOR SINGLE-FAMILY | | | DWELLING UNITS AND ALL OTHER DEVELOPMENTS . GENERAL | | | LANDSCAPING STANDARDS FOR SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS | | | AND ALL OTHER DEVELOPMENTS SHALL BE AS | | | FOLLOWS:A.SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS . FOR | | | SINGLE-FAMILY AND DUPLEX DWELLING UNITS, AT LEAST ONE | | | SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE SHALL BE PLANTED FOR EACH 1,000 | | | SQUARE FEET OF OPEN SPACE OR PORTION THEREOF. AT LEAST | | | ONE SHRUB SHALL BE PLANTED FOR EACH 500 SQUARE FEET OF | | | OPEN SPACE OR PORTION THEREOF. FRONT YARDS SHALL BE | | | LANDSCAPED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION | | | 94-482(A). | | | 94-482(A): LOCATION AND SURFACE. REQUIRED OFF-STREET | | | PARKING SPACES FOR LESS THAN THREE RESIDENTIAL DWELLING | | | UNITS SHALL BE PROVIDED ON THE PROPERTY ON WHICH THE | | | UNITS ARE LOCATED. REQUIRED PARKING MAY BE LOCATED IN A | | | FRONT YARD; HOWEVER, THE LESSER OF 1,000 SQUARE FEET OR | | | 75 PERCENT OF THE FRONT YARD AREA SHALL BE LANDSCAPED | | | WITH LIVING PLANT MATERIAL (SUCH AS GRASS, GROUND | | | COVER, SHRUBS, HEDGES, VINES OR TREES). | | | | | | PLEASE CONTACT RAY CARANCI AT [email protected] OR AT | | | 561-822-1462 | | | | | | | | | | | | LIZ LEVESQUE, URBAN DESIGN PLANNER | | | [email protected] | | | 561 822 1426 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2019-10-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
elevesqu |
Date |
2019-10-10 |
Time |
15:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
elevesqu |
Date |
2019-10-10 |
Time |
15:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-10-10 16:26:02 | NEW COMMENTS AS PLANS HAVE CHANGED AND IT HAVE BEEN SO | | | LONG SINCE LAST SUMITTAL: | | | | | | | | | 1. SCOPE OF WORK HAS NOT CHANGED - STILL MODIFICATIONS | | | TO DUPLEX BUT ALL PLANS FOR THE DUPLEX HAVE BEEN | | | REMOVED. | | | ARE RENOVATIONS ONLY OCCURING TO THE MAIN HOUSE? IF | | | RENOVATIONS STILL OCCURING TO DUPLEX, FULL PLANS NEED | | | TO BE SUBMITTED. | | | | | | 2. THE ADDRESS FOR THIS PROJECT IS 805 3RD STREET, NOT | | | 803 3RD STREET. PLEASE FIX ON ALL PLANS THAT SAY "803 | | | 3RD STREET" | | | | | | 3. STAFF HAS RECOGNIZED THAT THE PROPERTY MUST MEET | | | ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE CRITERIA. PERMITS FOR SINGLE | | | FAMILY RESIDENCES, WHERE THE PERMIT VALUE IS OVER 50% | | | OF THE IMPROVED LAND VALUE (PER PAPA), MUST BE ABLE TO | | | SHOW THAT THEY ARE MEETING THE CRITERIA FOR LANDSCAPING | | | FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES. THIS PERMIT VALUE MEETS | | | THIS REQUIREMENT. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION TO RAY | | | CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER: | | | PROVIDE A LIST OF THE NUMBER AND SPECIES OF TREES ON | | | SITE | | | PROVIDE A LIST OF THE AMOUNT (LENGTH) AND SPECIES OF | | | SHRUBS ON SITE | | | | | | IF CURRENT LANDSCAPING DOES NOT MEET CURRENT CODE, A | | | LANDSCAPE PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED. ZONING CANNOT PASS | | | PERMIT UNTIL IT IS VERIFIED THAT THE SITE MEETS | | | LANDSCAPE CODE, OR UNTIL A LANDSCAPE PERMIT IS SUMITTED | | | (IF NEEDED) | | | | | | LANDSCAPE CODE FOR SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS IS AS | | | FOLLOWS: | | | | | | (2)GENERAL LANDSCAPING STANDARDS FOR SINGLE-FAMILY | | | DWELLING UNITS AND ALL OTHER DEVELOPMENTS . GENERAL | | | LANDSCAPING STANDARDS FOR SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS | | | AND ALL OTHER DEVELOPMENTS SHALL BE AS | | | FOLLOWS:A.SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS . FOR | | | SINGLE-FAMILY AND DUPLEX DWELLING UNITS, AT LEAST ONE | | | SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE SHALL BE PLANTED FOR EACH 1,000 | | | SQUARE FEET OF OPEN SPACE OR PORTION THEREOF. AT LEAST | | | ONE SHRUB SHALL BE PLANTED FOR EACH 500 SQUARE FEET OF | | | OPEN SPACE OR PORTION THEREOF. FRONT YARDS SHALL BE | | | LANDSCAPED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION | | | 94-482(A). | | | 94-482(A): LOCATION AND SURFACE. REQUIRED OFF-STREET | | | PARKING SPACES FOR LESS THAN THREE RESIDENTIAL DWELLING | | | UNITS SHALL BE PROVIDED ON THE PROPERTY ON WHICH THE | | | UNITS ARE LOCATED. REQUIRED PARKING MAY BE LOCATED IN A | | | FRONT YARD; HOWEVER, THE LESSER OF 1,000 SQUARE FEET OR | | | 75 PERCENT OF THE FRONT YARD AREA SHALL BE LANDSCAPED | | | WITH LIVING PLANT MATERIAL (SUCH AS GRASS, GROUND | | | COVER, SHRUBS, HEDGES, VINES OR TREES). | | | | | | PLEASE CONTACT RAY CARANCI AT [email protected] OR AT | | | 561-822-1462 | | | | | | | | | | | | LIZ LEVESQUE, URBAN DESIGN PLANNER | | | [email protected] | | | 561 822 1426 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2019-05-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
elevesqu |
Date |
2019-05-02 |
Time |
11:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
elevesqu |
Date |
2019-05-02 |
Time |
11:36 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2019-05-02 11:35:51 | PROVISO: MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE OUTSIDE OF 5' | | | SIDE SETBACK | | | | | | LIZ LEVESQUE, URBAN DESIGN PLANNER | | | [email protected] | | | 561 822 1426 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2019-02-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
elevesqu |
Date |
2019-02-13 |
Time |
16:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
elevesqu |
Date |
2019-02-13 |
Time |
16:46 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2019-02-13 16:47:13 | PROVISO: MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO BE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF | | | 5' SIDE SETBACK | | | | | | LIZ LEVESQUE, URBAN DESIGN PLANNER | | | 561 822 1426 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-10-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
elevesqu |
Date |
2018-10-23 |
Time |
16:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
elevesqu |
Date |
2018-10-23 |
Time |
16:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-10-23 16:22:46 | PLEASE PROVIDE SITE PLAN SHOWING PROPERTY BOUNDARIES | | | WITH EXISTING/PROPOSED STRUCTURES. | | | | | | PLEASE INDICATE SETBACK OF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT FROM | | | PROPERTY LINES. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT CAN ENCROACH NO | | | MORE THAN FOUR FEET INTO REQUIRED SETBACKS. | | | THE REQUIRED SIDE SETBACK FOR THIS PROPERTY IS MINIMUM | | | 5 FEET, SO THE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT MUST BE AT LEAST | | | ONE FOOT AWAY FROM THE SIDE PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | PLEASE INDICATE WHAT THE RED HATCHED AREA ALONG THE | | | WEST SIDE OF THE ONE STORY RESIDENCE IS. | | | | | | PLEASE REFER TO HISTORICAL REVIEW STOP FOR ANY OTHER | | | ZONING COMMENTS. | | | | | | LIZ LEVESQUE, URBAN DESIGN PLANNER | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | 561 822 1426 |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |
