Plan Review Details - Permit 18071040
Plan Review Stops For Permit 18071040
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2019-01-14 Cont ID  
Sent By jleahy Date 2019-01-14 Time 09:39 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jleahy Date 2019-01-14 Time 09:39 Sent To Z
Notes
2019-01-14 09:39:551/14/19 SENT TO ZONING JLEAHY
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2018-08-06 Cont ID  
Sent By jleahy Date 2018-08-06 Time 11:22 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jleahy Date 2018-08-06 Time 11:22 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2019-01-22 Cont ID  
Sent By jleahy Date 2019-01-22 Time 09:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jleahy Date 2018-12-20 Time 11:18 Sent To  
Notes
2018-12-21 11:18:38RESUB ROUTED TO ZONING INBOX
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2018-08-30 Cont ID  
Sent By cpuell Date 2018-08-30 Time 15:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cpuell Date 2018-08-14 Time 10:26 Sent To  
Notes
2018-08-16 10:26:45RESUB ROUTED TO ZONING INBOX
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2018-08-06 Cont ID  
Sent By jleahy Date 2018-08-06 Time 11:23 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jleahy Date 2018-07-24 Time 14:20 Sent To  
Notes
2018-07-25 14:20:48ROUTED TO ZONING INBOX
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2019-01-15 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2019-01-15 Time 16:11 Rev Time 0.50
Received By eschneid Date 2019-01-10 Time 10:14 Sent To PC
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2018-08-30 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2018-08-30 Time 13:31 Rev Time 0.50
Received By eschneid Date 2018-08-30 Time 13:31 Sent To  
Notes
2018-08-30 13:48:36FAILED
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSE.
  
 1) THE PERMIT APPLICATION LISTS THE SCOPE OF WORK AS
 "ELECTRICAL SITE LIGHTING PER PLAN", YET THE PLANS SHOW
 NOT ONLY THE "SA" LIGHT LOCATIONS, BUT ALSO THE "F"
 LIGHT LOCATIONS. AN E-MAIL THAT IS INCLUDED WITH THE
 RESPONSE STATES THAT ONLY THE SA LIGHTS ARE PART OF THE
 SCOPE OF WORK. IF ONLY SA ARE PART OF THE SCOPE OF
 WORK:
  
 A. ALL THE F POLE PAGES NEED TO BE REMOVED. PLEASE NOTE
 THAT THE F SERIES POLES MAY NOT EXCEED 80 FEET IN
 OVERALL HEIGHT.
 B. SHEET E-1 NEEDS TO REMOVE OR MARK OUT THE F SERIES
 OF POLES FROM THE PLANS (F1 AND F2 STILL NOT SHOWN IN
 THE CITY COMMISSION APPROVED LOCATIONS).
  
 2) REPEAT COMMENT: POLE P87 IS IS SHOWN IN TWO
 DIFFERENT LOCATIONS ON THE SUBMITTED PLANS. THE
 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN AND THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOW THE SAME
 CONDITION AND THE POLE NOT CONFLICTING WITH ANY TREES.
 ON SHEET E-1.1 IT IS SHOWN CONFLICTING WITH A REQUIRED
 TERMINAL ISLAND TREE. SHEET E-1.1 NEEDS TO BE REVISED
 TO SHOW THE APPROVED POLE LOCATION, SINCE THE LOCATION
 SHOWN ON SHEET E-1.1 CONFLICTS WITH APPROVED LANDSCAPE.
  
 3) REPEAT COMMENT: POLE P103 IS IN A LOCATION WITH
 EXISTING TREES. PLEASE PROVIDE A CUT SHEET OF THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWING THE POLE LOCATIONS SO STAFF CAN
 VERIFY THAT NO CONFLICT EXISTS WITH THE EXISTING TREES
 (ALTERNATIVELY, A PHOTO WITH THE PROPOSED POLE CLEARLY
 MARKED WOULD SUFFICE). THE LANDSCAPE PLAN PROVIDED WITH
 THE RESUBMITTAL DOES NOT COVER THIS AREA.
  
 4) THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHOWS VALUES FOR P86 THAT ARE
 1.1 INSIDE THE PROPERTY LINE, BUT DO NOT VERIFY THAT
 THE LEVELS ARE LESS THAN 1.0 FOOT CANDLES ON THE
 ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY. PLEASE VERIFY THE
 LIGHTING LEVELS ON THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY. A CUT
 SHEET WILL SUFFICE.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2018-08-02 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2018-08-02 Time 15:56 Rev Time 0.75
Received By eschneid Date 2018-07-27 Time 11:18 Sent To E
Notes
2018-08-02 16:06:51FAILED
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSE.
  
 1) THE F1 AND F2 LOCATIONS ARE NOT PERMITTED TO HAVE
 LIGHT POLES AS THIS IS WITHIN THE REQUIRED 100 FOOT
 SETBACK AREA. THE POLE LOCATIONS ARE FURTHER EAST ON
 THE APPROVED SITE PLAN.
  
 2) INCLUDE THE SETBACKS FOR ALL POLES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS.
  
 3) THE PROPOSED SA POLE AT THE WEST END OF THE GRASS
 PARKING ROW IS NOT IN THE APPROVED LOCATION. IT APPEARS
 THAT IT WOULD CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED LANDSCAPE. PLEASE
 PROVIDE A CUT SHEET OF THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWING THE
 POLE LOCATION SO STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT NO CONFLICT
 EXISTS FOR THE NEW LOCATION.
  
 4) THE PAD MOUNTED TRANSFORMER APPEARS TO BE LOCATED
 WHERE THE SIDEWALK ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING IS
 TO BE INSTALLED. PLEASE CLARIFY. ADDITIONALLY, THE
 TRANSFORMER WILL NEED TO BE SCREENED. THE TRANSFORMER
 IS NOT SHOWN ON ANY APPROVED PLANS.
  
 5) THE POLE AT THE EAST SIDE OF THE PARKING BAY WITH
 FOUR ADA SPACES LOOKS LIKE IT MAY CONFLICT WITH THE
 REQUIRED TREE. THERE IS A POLE AND REQUIRED TREE SHOWN
 AT THIS LOCATION ON THE APPROVED SITE PLAN, SO BE
 COGNIZANT OF THE SHARED LOCATION UPON INSTALL.
  
 6) THE POLES SHOWN FLANKING THE SIDEWALK SOUTH OF THE
 DORMS ARE IN LOCATIONS WITH EXISTING TREES. PLEASE
 PROVIDE A CUT SHEET OF THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWING THE
 POLE LOCATIONS SO STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT NO CONFLICT
 EXISTS WITH THE EXISTING TREES.
  
 7) PROVIDE A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN. THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN
 SHALL VERIFY THAT NO GLARE WILL OCCUR INTO THE MILITARY
 TRAIL RIGHT-OF-WAY OR ONTO THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES
 SOUTH AND WEST OF THE LIGHT LOCATIONS. THE PLAN SHALL
 FURTHER SHOW THAT THE FOOT CANDLE LEVELS ARE LESS THAN
 ONE FOOT CANDLE PAST THE PROPERTY LINE.
  
 8) THE SITE LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE ON SHEET E-1.1
 STATES THAT THE FIXTURES WILL BE MOUNTED ON HAPCO
 POLES. THE POLE CUT SHEET DOES NOT IDENTIFY THE POLES
 AS HAPCO POLES, INSTEAD THEY APPEAR TO BE SMARTSHEET
 POLES. PLEASE EXPLAIN.
  
 9) PROVIDE A CUT SHEET SHOWING THE SPECIFIC LIGHT
 FIXTURE BEING PROPOSED.
  
 10) SINCE POLE LOCATIONS HAVE MOVED AND ADDITIONAL
 POLES HAVE BEEN ADDED, PRIOR TO C.O. OF THE ATHLETIC
 FACILITY, AN AS-BUILT SITE PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED TO
 THE PLANNING DIVISION THROUGH THE MINOR AMENDMENT
 PROCESS.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved