| 2018-07-17 10:58:39 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PETER LEDUC, |
| | FIRE MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | PLEASE CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING AS PROVISO: |
| | |
| | THESE PROVISO COMMENTS WILL BE VERIFIED AND CONFIRMED |
| | AT THE TIME OF FIRE INSPECTION. FAILURE TO FOLLOW THESE |
| | PROVISO COMMENTS WILL RESULT IN A FAILED FIRE |
| | INSPECTION. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) SHEET A 3 - THERE IS AN INDICATION OF A LOCK SET |
| | WITH A CYLINDER BOLT. THIS IS THE MAIN EXIT DOOR FROM |
| | THE PHARMACY AREA AND MUST COMPLY WITH NFPA 101, |
| | CHAPTER 7, MEANS OF EGRESS. |
| | |
| | 7.2.1.5 LOCKS, LATCHES, AND ALARM DEVICES |
| | |
| | 7.2.1.5.3 LOCKS, IF PROVIDED, SHALL NOT REQUIRE THE USE |
| | OF A KEY, A |
| | TOOL, OR SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE OR EFFORT FOR OPERATION FROM |
| | THE EGRESS |
| | SIDE. |
| | |
| | 7.2.1.5.5 KEY-OPERATED LOCKS. |
| | 7.2.1.5.5.1* EXTERIOR DOOR ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE |
| | PERMITTED TO HAVE |
| | KEY-OPERATED LOCKS FROM THE EGRESS SIDE, PROVIDED THAT |
| | ALL OF THE |
| | FOLLOWING CRITERIA ARE MET: |
| | (1) THIS ALTERNATIVE IS PERMITTED IN CHAPTERS 11 |
| | THROUGH 43 FOR |
| | THE SPECIFIC OCCUPANCY. |
| | (2) A READILY VISIBLE, DURABLE SIGN IN LETTERS NOT LESS |
| | THAN 1 IN. |
| | (25 MM) HIGH ON A CONTRASTING BACKGROUND THAT READS AS |
| | FOLLOWS IS LOCATED ON OR ADJACENT TO THE DOOR LEAF: |
| | THIS |
| | DOOR TO REMAIN UNLOCKED WHEN THE |
| | BUILDING IS OCCUPIED. |
| | (3) THE LOCKING DEVICE IS OF A TYPE THAT IS READILY |
| | DISTINGUISHABLE |
| | AS LOCKED. |
| | (4) A KEY IS IMMEDIATELY AVAILABLE TO ANY OCCUPANT |
| | INSIDE THE |
| | BUILDING WHEN IT IS LOCKED. |
| | |
| | THOUGH THIS DOOR IS NOT A TRUE EXTERIOR DOOR, IT IS THE |
| | EXTERIOR DOOR OF THE PHARMACY AND SIMILAR NEED EXIST |
| | FOR EXITING THIS SPACE. |
| | |
| | PLEASE ENSURE THAT EGRESS FROM THE PHARMACY COMPLIES |
| | WITH THE OF NOTED AREAS ON FIRE INSPECTIONS. |
| | |
| | |
| | PETER LEDUC |
| | FIRE MARSHAL |
| | 561-804-4709 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
