|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 18020058
| Plan Review Stops For Permit 18020058 |
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2018-02-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
2018-02-02 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2018-02-02 |
Time |
11:57 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2018-02-02 13:19:49 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | PLEASE CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING AS PROVISO: | | | | | | THESE PROVISO COMMENTS WILL BE VERIFIED AND CONFIRMED | | | AT THE TIME OF FIRE INSPECTION. FAILURE TO FOLLOW THESE | | | PROVISO COMMENTS WILL RESULT IN A FAILED FIRE | | | INSPECTION. | | | | | | | | | | | | 1) THERE IS NO CLEAR INDICATION OF A MANUAL PULL | | | STATION FOR THE SYSTEM. PLEASE ENSURE ONE IS INSTALLED | | | PER NFPA 96: | | | | | | 10.5 MANUAL ACTIVATION. | | | 10.5.1 A READILY ACCESSIBLE MEANS FOR MANUAL ACTIVATION | | | SHALL BE LOCATED BETWEEN 1067 MM AND 1219 MM (42 IN. | | | AND 48 IN.) ABOVE THE FLOOR, BE ACCESSIBLE IN THE EVENT | | | OF A FIRE, BE LOCATED IN A PATH OF EGRESS, AND CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFY THE HAZARD PROTECTED. | | | 10.5.1.1 AT LEAST ONE MANUAL ACTUATION DEVICE SHALL BE | | | LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 3 M (10 FT) AND A MAXIMUM OF 6 M | | | (20 FT) FROM THE PROTECTED HOOD EXHAUST SYSTEM(S) | | | WITHIN A PATH OF EGRESS OR AT AN ALTERNATIVE LOCATION | | | ACCEPTABLE TO THE AHJ. | | | 10.5.1.2 MANUAL ACTIVATION USING A CABLE-OPERATED PULL | | | STATION SHALL NOT REQUIRE MORE THAN 178 N (40 LB) OF | | | FORCE, WITH A PULL MOVEMENT NOT TO EXCEED 356 MM (14 | | | IN.) TO ACTIVATE THE AUTOMATIC FIRE-EXTINGUISHING | | | EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | | | | | | | 2) ENSURE THAT A FIRE ALARM TECH IS ON SITE WHEN THE | | | FIRE INSPETION TEST IS SCHEDULED. | | | | | | | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
2018-05-10 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2018-04-24 |
Time |
11:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-04-25 11:47:12 | RESUB ROUTED TO CCOLE |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
2018-04-03 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2018-03-21 |
Time |
13:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-03-22 13:20:10 | RESUB ROUTED TO CCOLE |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
2018-02-13 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2018-02-01 |
Time |
10:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-02-02 10:21:28 | ROUTED TO FIRE INBOX |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2018-05-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ccole |
Date |
2018-05-15 |
Time |
15:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ccole |
Date |
2018-05-15 |
Time |
15:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-05-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ccole |
Date |
2018-05-10 |
Time |
11:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ccole |
Date |
2018-05-10 |
Time |
11:13 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2018-05-10 11:24:13 | 3RD REVIEW FBC-2017 MECHANICAL | | | PERMIT #18020058 | | | 5/10/18 | | | | | | PLAN REVIEW RESULTS: DENIED. | | | | | | 1) THE RESUBMITTED LETTER FROM KAMM ENGINEERING IS | | | ADDRESSING PRESSURIZATION OF THE SPACES RATHER THAN THE | | | ISSUE OF TEMPERSATURE OF MAKEUP AIR. PLEASE NOTE THAT | | | IF USING THE EXCEPTION IN 508.1.1 THAT THE ADDED | | | COOLING LOAD FROM THE MAKEUP AIR DOES NOT EXCEED THE | | | CAPACITY OF THE AC SYSTEM, PLEASE STATE THAT CLEARLY IN | | | THE LETTER AND PROVIDE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY | | | RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE INSERT | | | CORRECTED PLAN SHEETS INTO THE SETS, REMOVE THE | | | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS AND MARK VOID ON THEM, AND | | | KEEP THEM WITH THE SUBMITTALS. | | | | | | CHRISTOPHER L. COLE | | | MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET | | | WEST PALM BEACH FL 33401 | | | 561-805-6719 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-04-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ccole |
Date |
2018-04-03 |
Time |
11:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ccole |
Date |
2018-04-03 |
Time |
10:58 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2018-04-03 11:26:41 | 2ND REVIEW FBC-2017 MECHANICAL | | | PERMIT #18020058 | | | 4/3/18 | | | | | | PLAN REVIEW RESULTS: DENIED. | | | | | | 1) THE LETTER FROM KAMM ENGINEERING THAT WAS SIGNED BY | | | THE PROJECT MANAGER JOHN MAYR DOES NOT ADDRESS COMMENT | | | #1 FROM THE 1ST REVIEW. THE SUBMITTED LETTER MAKES THIS | | | GENERAL STATEMENT " THE HOOD SYSTEM HAS BEEN TAKEN INTO | | | ACCOUNT DURING THE DESIGN OF THE BUILDING HVAC SYSTEM". | | | HOWEVER NO EVIDENCE IN THE FORM OF CALCULATIONS, DATA, | | | OR EXPLANATORY INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO SHOW | | | THE ADDED COOLING LOAD OF THE MAKEUP AIR HAS BEEN | | | CALCULATED INTO THE TOTAL DESIGN LOADS FOR SIZING OF | | | THE HVAC SYSTEMS. PLEASE NOTE THAT GENERALLY ABOUT 20% | | | OF THE SUPPLY AIR PROVIDED FOR THE HOOD IS DIFFUSED | | | INTO THE SPACE. THAT IS THE BASIS OF THE REQUIRED | | | CALCULATION. I HAVE REPRINTED THE COMMENT BELOW- PLEASE | | | SHOW COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | 1) VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 508.1.1 MAKEUP AIR | | | TEMPERATURE: THE TEMPERATURE DIFFERENTIAL BETWEEN | | | MAKEUP AIR AND THE AIR IN THE CONDITIONED SPACE SHALL | | | NOT EXCEED 10?F (6?C) EXCEPT WHERE THE ADDED HEATING | | | AND COOLING LOADS OF THE MAKEUP AIR DO NOT EXCEED THE | | | CAPACITY OF THE HVAC SYSTEM. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY | | | RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE INSERT | | | CORRECTED PLAN SHEETS INTO THE SETS, REMOVE THE | | | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS AND MARK VOID ON THEM, AND | | | KEEP THEM WITH THE SUBMITTALS. | | | | | | CHRISTOPHER L. COLE | | | MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET | | | WEST PALM BEACH FL 33401 | | | 561-805-6719 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-02-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ccole |
Date |
2018-02-13 |
Time |
14:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ccole |
Date |
2018-02-13 |
Time |
14:50 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2018-02-13 15:07:37 | 1ST REVIEW FBC-2017 MECHANICAL | | | PERMIT #18020058 | | | 2/13/18 | | | | | | PLAN REVIEW RESULTS: DENIED. | | | | | | | | | 1) VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 508.1.1 MAKEUP AIR | | | TEMPERATURE: THE TEMPERATURE DIFFERENTIAL BETWEEN | | | MAKEUP AIR AND THE AIR IN THE CONDITIONED SPACE SHALL | | | NOT EXCEED 10?F (6?C) EXCEPT WHERE THE ADDED HEATING | | | AND COOLING LOADS OF THE MAKEUP AIR DO NOT EXCEED THE | | | CAPACITY OF THE HVAC SYSTEM. | | | | | | 2) PROVIDE THE WIND LOAD DESIGN CRITERIA FOR | | | INSTALLATION OF THE ROOFTOP FANS- SEE SECTION 1609 | | | FBC-17 BUILDING. | | | | | | 3) SUBMIT MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE DUCT | | | WRAP WITH SHOP DRAWING STAMP BY THE EOR- SECTION | | | 506.3.11. | | | | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY | | | RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE INSERT | | | CORRECTED PLAN SHEETS INTO THE SETS, REMOVE THE | | | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS AND MARK VOID ON THEM, AND | | | KEEP THEM WITH THE SUBMITTALS. | | | | | | CHRISTOPHER L. COLE | | | MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET | | | WEST PALM BEACH FL 33401 | | | 561-805-6719 | | | [email protected] | | | PLAN REVIEW RESULTS: DENIED. |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |
|
