| Plan Review Stops For Permit 17101066 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2018-02-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2018-02-23 |
Time |
12:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2018-02-23 |
Time |
12:53 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-02-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2018-02-20 |
Time |
17:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2018-02-20 |
Time |
17:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-02-20 19:00:30 | ROOFING MATERIAL: POLYGLASS MODIFIED BITUMEN FL1654-20 | | | | | | THE RAS117 CALCULATIONS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE FOR THE | | | FOLLOWING REASONS: | | | 1) THIS PRODUCT APPROVAL IS NOT A MIAMI-DADE NOTICE OF | | | ACCEPTANCE. THIS IS A FLORIDA (DBPR) PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | | IN ORDER TO AVOID CONFUSION, REMOVE THE NOA FROM THE FL | | | 1654-R20 FROM THE ENGINEER'S LETTER. FBC 107.2.1 | | | | | | 2) THE PAGE NUMBER FROM THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL IS | | | INCORRECTLY SPECIFIED AS SHEET 17 OF 58. THE SYSTEM | | | NUMBER IS SPECIFIED ON THE ENGINEER'S LETTER AS W-94, | | | WHICH IS LOCATED ON PAGE 18 OF 55. FBC 107.2.1 | | | | | | 3) THE REQUIRED UPLIFT PRESSURES FOR THE ROOF ZONES IS | | | NOT SPECIFIED ON THE ENGINEER'S LETTER. THE WIND SPEED, | | | EXPOSURE CATEGORY AND MEAN ROOF HEIGHT ARE ALSO NOT | | | PROVIDED. FBC-R301.2.1 | | | | | | 4) THE W-94 ROOFING SYSTEM HAS A MAXIMUM DESIGN | | | PRESSURE OF -67.5 PSF. THE LETTER STATES THAT THE | | | MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURE IS -60 PSF. FBC 107.2.1 | | | | | | 5) THE W-94 ROOFING SYSTEM IS A PROPRIETARY SYSTEM AND | | | REQUIRES POLYGLASS APP BASE FOR THE BASE SHEET. THE | | | OTHERS LISTED IN THE LETTER CAN NOT BE USED WITH THIS | | | SYSTEM. FBC 107.2.1 | | | | | | 6) THIS SYSTEM REQUIRES FOUR (4) EQUALLY SPACED | | | STAGGERED CENTER ROWS AND THE LETTER ONLY SPECIFIES | | | THREE (3). FBC 107.2.1 | | | | | | 7) THE PERIMETER AND CORNER AREA FASTENING DOES NOT | | | SPECIFY THE LAP OR THE NUMBER OF CENTER ROWS. FBC | | | 107.2.1 | | | | | | 8) SUBMIT TWO SETS OF THE ACTUAL RAS 117 CALCULATIONS | | | THAT WERE USED TO DETERMINE THE ENHANCED FASTENING. FBC | | | 107.2.1.3 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-02-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2018-02-01 |
Time |
18:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2018-02-01 |
Time |
17:02 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2018-02-01 18:24:15 | PLAN | | | REVIEW COMMENTS | | | | | | 1ST REVIEW: FBC FIFTH EDITION (2014) | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561) 805-6714 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | DENIED BY BUILDING | | | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: | | | FBC 107.2.1 | | | THE RAS 117 CALCULATIONS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE FOR THE | | | FOLLOWING REASONS: | | | 1) THE SYSTEM NUMBER FROM THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL | | | (FL1654-R20) IS NOT SPECIFIED. | | | 2) THE PAGE NUMBER FROM THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL IS | | | NOT SPECIFIED. | | | 3) THE UPLIFT PRESSURE FOR ROOF ZONE 3 IS NOT CORRECT. | | | IT SHOULD BE -95.7 PSF FOR THIS PROJECT. | | | 4) I COULD NOT FIND ANY SYSTEMS THAT HAVE A MAXIMUM | | | DESIGN PRESSURE OF -60 PSF WITH FASTENER SPACINGS OF | | | 10"OC AT THE 4" LAP AND 6"OC IN THREE EQUALLY SPACED | | | STAGGERED ROWS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2017-11-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2017-11-02 |
Time |
17:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2017-11-02 |
Time |
07:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-11-02 17:58:04 | PLAN | | | REVIEW COMMENTS | | | | | | 1ST REVIEW: FBC FIFTH EDITION (2014) | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561) 805-6714 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | DENIED BY BUILDING | | | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: | | | | | | 1) ENERGY FORM R402 - 2014 IS REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED AND | | | DATED BY THE PREPARER AND THE OWNER/AGENT CERTIFYING | | | COMPLIANCE WITH THE ENERGY CODE. FBC ENERGY | | | CONSERVATION SECTION R103. | | | | | | 2) INDICATE THE SYSTEM NUMBER AND MAXIMUM DESIGN | | | PRESSURE FOR THE ROOF COVERING THAT WILL BE USED ON THE | | | PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE POLYGLASS MODIFIED BITUMEN | | | ROOF SYSTEM. FBC 107.2.1 | | | | | | 3) SUBMIT TWO SETS OF SIGNED AND SEALED ENHANCED | | | FASTENING CALCULATIONS FROM A FLORIDA LICENSED ENGINEER | | | FOR THE POLYGLASS MODIFIED BITUMEN ROOF SYSTEM. SEE | | | NOTE 8 ON PAGE 2 OF 55 OF THE PRODUCT APPROVAL. FBC - | | | R301.2.1 | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2018-01-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jpearson |
Date |
2018-01-31 |
Time |
11:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jpearson |
Date |
2018-01-31 |
Time |
06:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2017-11-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jpearson |
Date |
2017-11-17 |
Time |
11:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jpearson |
Date |
2017-11-17 |
Time |
11:14 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2017-11-17 11:14:32 | CODES IN EFFECT: | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2014 5TH EDITION | | | FBC CE = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ENERGY CONSERVATION 2014 | | | 5TH EDITION | | | FBC RE = FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE 2014 5TH EDITION | | | NEC = NFPA 70 2011 EDITION, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE | | | FS = FLORIDA STATUTES | | | | | | ELECTRICAL REVIEW STATUS: DENIED, SEE COMMENTS BELOW. | | | | | | 1. RISER DIAGRAM SHOW # 6 WIRE FEEDING A 125 AMP PANEL. | | | PROVIDE CORRECTION FOR WIRE SIZE, # 6 IS NOT RATED FOR | | | 125 AMPS. NEC 310.15(B)(16); FBC RE 3705.1 | | | 2. RISER DIAGRAM SHOWS 2 PANELS, PROVIDE PANEL SCHEDULE | | | FOR EACH. NEC 408.4; FBC 107.2.1 | | | 3. RISER DIAGRAM SHOWS THE INTERSYSTEM BONDING | | | TERMINATION POINT LOCATED AT SUB-PANEL. THIS SHOULD BE | | | AT MAIN SERVICE. PROVIDE CORRECTION. FBC RE 3609.3 | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED | | | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. WHEN | | | RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY | | | RESUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, INSERT CORRECTED PAGES | | | INTO THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE OR VOID THE | | | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS. | | | | | | SINCERELY, | | | | | | JOHN PEARSON | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6746 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2018-02-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2018-02-23 |
Time |
13:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2018-02-21 |
Time |
14:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-02-22 14:15:28 | RESUB ROUTED TO RMCDOUGAL |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2018-02-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2018-02-20 |
Time |
18:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2018-02-15 |
Time |
13:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-02-16 13:17:48 | RESUB ROUTED TO RMCDOUGAL |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2018-02-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2018-02-01 |
Time |
18:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2018-01-08 |
Time |
15:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2017-11-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jpearson |
Date |
2017-11-17 |
Time |
11:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jpearson |
Date |
2017-10-25 |
Time |
12:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2018-02-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2018-02-26 |
Time |
16:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2018-02-26 |
Time |
16:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2017-11-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2017-11-02 |
Time |
07:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2017-11-02 |
Time |
07:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-11-02 07:45:39 | BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT CAN BE ISSUED, IMPACT FEES | | | MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. UPON APPROVAL, ONE | | | SET OF PLANS SHALL BE SIGNED OUT AND SUBMITTED TO PALM | | | BEACH COUNTY FOR AN IMPACT FEE REVIEW. THE PLANS WITH | | | THE IMPACT FEE STAMP AND A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT | | | MUST BE RETURNED TO THE CITY BUILDING DEPARTMENT BEFORE | | | THE BUILDING PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. FOR INFORMATION CALL | | | PALM BEACH COUNTY IMPACT FEES AT (561) 233-5025. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2018-01-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
hmoser |
Date |
2018-01-31 |
Time |
13:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
hmoser |
Date |
2018-01-31 |
Time |
13:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2017-11-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2017-11-02 |
Time |
14:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2017-11-02 |
Time |
14:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2017-11-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2017-11-02 |
Time |
10:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2017-11-02 |
Time |
10:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2018-02-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2018-02-23 |
Time |
12:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2018-02-23 |
Time |
12:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-02-23 13:07:14 | FL16709-R4, CERTAINTEED MODIFIED BITUMEN ROOF SYSTEM, | | | PAGES 13-14 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-02-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2018-02-20 |
Time |
17:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2018-02-20 |
Time |
17:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-02-20 18:51:15 | ROOFING MATERIAL: POLYGLASS MODIFIED BITUMEN FL1654-20 | | | | | | THE RAS117 CALCULATIONS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE FOR THE | | | FOLLOWING REASONS: | | | 1) THIS PRODUCT APPROVAL IS NOT A MIAMI-DADE NOTICE OF | | | ACCEPTANCE. THIS IS A FLORIDA (DBPR) PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | | IN ORDER TO AVOID CONFUSION, REMOVE THE NOA FROM THE FL | | | 1654-R20 FROM THE ENGINEER'S LETTER. FBC 107.2.1 | | | | | | 2) THE PAGE NUMBER FROM THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL IS | | | INCORRECTLY SPECIFIED AS SHEET 17 OF 58. THE SYSTEM | | | NUMBER IS SPECIFIED ON THE ENGINEER'S LETTER AS W-94, | | | WHICH IS LOCATED ON PAGE 18 OF 55. FBC 107.2.1 | | | | | | 3) THE REQUIRED UPLIFT PRESSURES FOR THE ROOF ZONES IS | | | NOT SPECIFIED ON THE ENGINEER'S LETTER. THE WIND SPEED, | | | EXPOSURE CATEGORY AND MEAN ROOF HEIGHT ARE ALSO NOT | | | PROVIDED. FBC-R301.2.1 | | | | | | 4) THE W-94 ROOFING SYSTEM HAS A MAXIMUM DESIGN | | | PRESSURE OF -67.5 PSF. THE LETTER STATES THAT THE | | | MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURE IS -60 PSF. FBC 107.2.1 | | | | | | 5) THE W-94 ROOFING SYSTEM IS A PROPRIETARY SYSTEM AND | | | REQUIRES POLYGLASS APP BASE FOR THE BASE SHEET. THE | | | OTHERS LISTED IN THE LETTER CAN NOT BE USED WITH THIS | | | SYSTEM. FBC 107.2.1 | | | | | | 6) THIS SYSTEM REQUIRES FOUR (4) EQUALLY SPACED | | | STAGGERED CENTER ROWS AND THE LETTER ONLY SPECIFIES | | | THREE (3). FBC 107.2.1 | | | | | | 7) THE PERIMETER AND CORNER AREA FASTENING DOES NOT | | | SPECIFY THE LAP OR THE NUMBER OF CENTER ROWS. FBC | | | 107.2.1 | | | | | | 8) SUBMIT TWO SETS OF THE ACTUAL RAS 117 CALCULATIONS | | | THAT WERE USED TO DETERMINE THE ENHANCED FASTENING. FBC | | | 107.2.1.3 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-02-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2018-02-01 |
Time |
18:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2018-02-01 |
Time |
18:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-02-01 18:32:12 | ROOFING MATERIAL: POLYGLASS MODIFIED BITUMEN FL1654-20 | | | | | | THE RAS117 CALCULATIONS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE FOR THE | | | FOLLOWING REASONS: | | | 1) THE SYSTEM NUMBER FROM THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL | | | (FL1654-R20) IS NOT SPECIFIED. | | | 2) THE PAGE NUMBER FROM THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL IS | | | NOT SPECIFIED. | | | 3) THE UPLIFT PRESSURE FOR ROOF ZONE 3 IS NOT CORRECT. | | | IT SHOULD BE -95.7 PSF FOR THIS PROJECT. | | | 4) I COULD NOT FIND ANY SYSTEMS THAT HAVE A MAXIMUM | | | DESIGN PRESSURE OF -60 PSF WITH FASTENER SPACINGS OF | | | 10"OC AT THE 4" LAP AND 6"OC IN THREE EQUALLY SPACED | | | STAGGERED ROWS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2018-01-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
2018-01-22 |
Time |
16:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
2018-01-22 |
Time |
15:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-01-22 16:04:08 | SCOPE OF WORK DOES NOT EXCEED 50% OF THE VALUE OF THE | | | STRUCTURE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2017-11-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
LL |
Date |
2017-11-15 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
2017-11-06 |
Time |
16:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-11-15 16:24:44 | SCOPE OF WORK DOES NOT EXCEED 50% OF THE VALUE OF THE | | | STRUCTURE. |
|
|