Plan Review Details - Permit 17090144
Plan Review Stops For Permit 17090144
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 5 Status P Date 2017-10-30 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2017-10-30 Time 14:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2017-10-30 Time 14:55 Sent To  
Notes
2017-10-30 14:56:36LEE SUBMITTED REVISED CALCULATIONS. JG.
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2017-10-25 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2017-10-24 Time 18:15 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2017-10-24 Time 17:15 Sent To  
Notes
2017-10-24 17:40:39RESIDENTIAL (R3) RE-ROOF FOURTH BUILDING REVIEW
 CHECKLIST.
 CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014).
  
 1- ENGINEER TO REVISE RAS 117 CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED:
 A) CALCULATIONS ARE NOT CLEAR AND SEEM TO BE INCORRECT.
 CLARIFY WHY THE # OF ROWS HAVING SPACING A IS "0". I
 THINK THIS SHOULD BE 1. SINCE CALCULATIONS ARE NOT
 CLEAR, I ASSUME THIS IS THE SIDE LAP. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
 NOTE: CALCULATIONS ARE NOT CLEAR, THE LETTERS "A" AND
 "C" ARE REPEATED BUT THEY SEEM TO APPLY FOR DIFFERENT
 THINGS. I AM JUST ASSUMING ONE A IS FOR FASTENER
 SPACING IN THE LAP AND THE OTHER A IS FOR FASTENER
 SPACING IN THE CENTER ROWS. AND, ONE C IS FOR THE
 NUMBER OF ROWS HAVING SPACING A IN THE SIDE LAP AND THE
 OTHER C IS FOR # OF ROWS HAVING SPACING A IN THE CENTER
 ROWS.
  
 B) NUMBER OF ROWS AND SPACING SPECIFIED FOR THE CORNER
 AREAS SEEM TO BE INCORRECT. WE USE A SPREAD SHEET TO
 VERIFY RAS 117 CALCULATIONS WHEN WE THINK THERE IS
 SOMETHING THAT IS NOT CLEAR. BASED ON THE DESIGN
 PRESSURES AND INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM THE NOA
 SUBMITTED IT LOOKS LIKE CORNER ZONES WILL REQUIRE AT
 LEAST FOUR ROWS OF FASTENER IN THE CENTER OF THE SHEET
 AND NOT 3 AS SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER ( FASTENER
 SPACING CAN NOT BE LESS THAN 4" O.C. AS REQUIRED BY RAS
 117 SEC. 8.1). ENCLOSED SEE THE RAS 117 CALCULATIONS
 THAT I RUN FOR THIS PROJECT. ENGINEER TO REVISE AS
 REQUIRED OR PROVIDE COMPLETE RAS 117 CALCULATIONS
 SHOWING THAT OUR SAMPLE IS INCORRECT. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY
 AMENDMENTS.
  
 NOTE: AS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B)
 ENGINEER MAY BE CHARGED FOUR TIMES THE PLAN REVIEW FEES
 FOR MULTIPLE REJECTIONS.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2017-10-18 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2017-10-18 Time 07:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2017-10-17 Time 18:13 Sent To  
Notes
2017-10-18 08:41:35RESIDENTIAL (R3) RE-ROOF THIRD BUILDING REVIEW
 CHECKLIST.
 CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014).
  
 1- ENGINEER TO REVISE THE RAS 117 CALCULATIONS
 SUBMITTED:
  
 A) THE FASTENING SPECIFIED ON THE THE SELECTED ASSEMBLY
 ON PAGE 14 OF NOA 17-0222.09 AND THE FASTENING
 SPECIFIED ON RAS 117 CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED DON'T
 MATCH. NOA SHOWS THREE ROWS OF FASTENERS IN THE CENTER
 OF THE SHEET, WHILE ENGINEER CALCULATIONS SHOW TWO
 ROWS. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. NOTE: CLEARLY SHOW
 NUMBER OF ROWS REQUIRED FOR THE PERIMETER AND CORNER
 AREAS ON THE ENHANCED FASTENING PATTERN. SEC. 8.1 OF
 RAS 117.
  
 B) NOA 17-0222.09 SHOWS THE FASTENER SPACING TO BE AT
 6"O.C. ENGINEER CHANGED THE FASTENER SPACING TO 7"O.C.
 FOR FIELD ZONE. ACCORDING TO RAS 117 SEC. 8.1 THE
 FASTENING SPACING SHOWN ON THE NOA SHALL BE APPLICABLE
 TO THE FIELD ZONE. THEREFORE, IT CAN NOT BE CHANGED.
 ENGINEER TO REVISE FASTENER SPACING AS REQUIRED.
  
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2017-10-11 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2017-10-11 Time 11:05 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2017-10-11 Time 09:51 Sent To  
Notes
2017-10-11 10:47:25RESIDENTIAL (R3) RE-ROOF SECOND BUILDING REVIEW
 CHECKLIST.
 CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014).
  
 1- ENGINEER TO REVISE THE RAS 117 CALCULATIONS
 SUBMITTED:
 A) ACCORDING TO SEC. R301.2.1.4.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH
 EDITION (2014) THIS BUILDING IS LOCATED IN EXPOSURE "D"
 NOT EXPOSURE "C". REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 B) IT IS NOT CLEAR WHICH APPROVED FLAT ROOF SYSTEM IS
 GOING TO BE INSTALLED. ROOFING CONTRACTOR SUBMITTED
 SYSTEM TYPE E(3) ON PAGE 14 OF 15 OF NOA 17-0222.09.
 ENGINEER DOESN'T DESCRIBE THE SPECIFIC FLAT ROOF SYSTEM
 FROM NOA 17-0222.09 TO BE INSTALLED, BUT THE FASTENER
 SPACING ENGINEER IS SPECIFYING ON PAGE TWO OF THREE OF
 CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED DOESN'T MATCH THE FASTENER
 SPACING SHOWN ON THE SYSTEM SUBMITTED BY THE ROOFING
 CONTRACTOR. ENGINEER TO COORDINATE WITH ROOFING
 CONTRACTOR AND CLEARLY IDENTIFY WHICH SPECIFIC FLAT
 ROOF SYSTEM IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY
 AMENDMENTS.
  
 C) THE MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURE OF THE SELECTED FLAT
 ROOF SYSTEM IS LESS THAN THE CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURE
 FOR ROOF ZONE #1. THEREFORE, THIS FLAT ROOF SYSTEM CAN
 NOT BE USED. SEE SEC. 8.1 OF RAS 117. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED TO COMPLY.
  
 D) PAGE 3 OF RAS 117 CALCULATIONS SHOW A FASTENER
 SPACING OF 3 INCHES FOR CORNER AREAS. THE MINIMUM
 FASTENER SEPARATION SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 4 INCHES
 O.C. AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 8.1 OF RAS 117. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED TO COMPLY.
  
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2017-09-07 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2017-09-07 Time 07:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2017-09-06 Time 17:02 Sent To  
Notes
2017-09-07 10:46:59RESIDENTIAL (R3) RE-ROOF BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS.
 CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014).
  
 1- PROVIDE SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS FOR
 NAIL ENHANCEMENT AT PERIMETER AND CORNER AREAS AS
 REQUIRED BY GENERAL LIMITATION #7 ON LAST PAGE OF NOA
 17-0222.09 SUBMITTED. NEED THE CALCULATIONS TO MEET THE
 DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH
 EDITION (2014).
  
 2- PROVIDE ROOF SKETCH SHOWING THE TOTAL FLAT ROOF AREA
 AS REQUIRED BY CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH POLICY FOR
 RE-ROOF PERMITS. ALSO, SPECIFY THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT.
 SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2017-10-25 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2017-10-24 Time 18:15 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2017-10-23 Time 10:19 Sent To  
Notes
2017-10-24 10:19:27RESUB ROUTED TO JGOMEZ
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2017-10-18 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2017-10-18 Time 07:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2017-10-16 Time 13:35 Sent To  
Notes
2017-10-17 13:35:13RESUB ROUTED TO JGOMEZ
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2017-10-11 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2017-10-11 Time 11:58 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2017-10-06 Time 10:35 Sent To  
Notes
2017-10-10 10:35:56RESUB ROUTED TO JGOMEZ
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2017-09-07 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2017-09-07 Time 07:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2017-09-05 Time 09:39 Sent To  
Notes
2017-09-06 09:39:32JGOMEZ


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved