Plan Review Details - Permit 17060359
Plan Review Stops For Permit 17060359
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 6 Status P Date 2018-05-03 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2018-05-03 Time 16:18 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2018-05-03 Time 16:18 Sent To  
Notes
2018-05-03 16:20:00***PROVISO***
  
 ISSUED AT APPLICANT'S RISK
  
 SUBMIT STOREFRONT AND DOOR PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR REVIEW
 PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. THEY ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE IMPACT
 PROTECTION, ADA THRESHOLD, AND PANIC BARS.
  
 SEE FBC B 1008.1.9, PLAN WAS REVISED TO SHOW REMOVAL OF
 DOOR HARDWARE. THIS WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE FIELD
 INSPECTOR'S APPROVAL. IF THE DOOR LOOKS LIKE A DOOR,
 REMOVAL OF THE HARDWARE WILL NOT BE ADEQUATE TO RESOLVE
 THE COMMENT. IF APPLICANT IS ABLE TO MODIFY THE DOOR IN
 SUCH A WAY THAT IT IS CLEARLY NOT A DOOR, THAT IS
 ACCEPTABLE. A REVISION SHOWING MODIFICATIONS
 IMPLEMENTED MAY BE REQUIRED, SUBJECT TO FIELD
 INSPECTOR'S DISCRETION.
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 5 Status F Date 2018-04-28 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2018-04-28 Time 10:47 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2018-04-28 Time 10:47 Sent To  
Notes
2018-04-28 11:08:03***CORRECTION****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014)
 FBC B = FBC BUILDING
 FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING
 FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY
 FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION
  
 1. REPEAT COMMENT - FBC B 1008, PANIC DEVICE REQUIRED
 FOR THE DOORS (ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY WITH OCC LOAD OVER
 50). AS DISCUSSED AND NOTED IN PREVIOUS PLAN REVIEWS,
 THE STOREFRONT AND DOORS ARE A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF
 THE PROPOSED WORK AND NON COMPLIANT INFORMATION HAS
 BEEN SUBMITTED IN EACH OF THE FIVE REVIEWS. FOR THIS
 REASON, THIS INFORMATION IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO PERMIT
 ISSUANCE AND WILL NOT BE A PROVISO ITEM AS IS OUR
 GENERAL PRACTICE.
  
 THE DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED IS FOR A NON IMPACT
 DOOR AND DOES NOT INCLUDE A PANIC DEVICE.
  
 IMPACT PROTECTION IS REQUIRED PER FBC B 1609.1.2.
  
 A SHUTTER IS NOT PERMITTED AT THE DOORS PER FBC B
 1003.6. SHUTTERS ARE PERMITTED AT EXITS WHEN THEY FALL
 UNDER THE EXEMPTION FBC B 1008.1.4, BUT THIS EXEMPTION
 DOES NOT INCLUDE ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY. USE OF NON IMPACT
 DOORS WOULD REQUIRE APPROVAL BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL;
 APPLICANT MUST PROVIDE RATIONALE IN A SIGNED AND SEALED
 LETTER.
  
 USE OF REMOVABLE SHUTTERS IN A COMMERCIAL BUILDING
 REQUIRES APPROVAL BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. IT IS NOT
 CLEAR WHETHER FIXED OR REMOVABLE IMPACT PROTECTION IS
 PROPOSED.
  
 NO THRESHOLD INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED; ADA THRESHOLD
 REQUIRED ON BOTH DOORS; IS THIS WHAT IS PROPOSED?
  
 YOU MAY SEND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION VIA EMAIL AND A
 COURTESY REVIEW WILL BE PERFORMED.
  
 2. BUILDING TYPE NOT CLEAR; IIB IS STATED IN SOME
 LOCATIONS, IIIB IN ANOTHER, CLARIFY. THIS WILL BE
 REDLINED UPON REQUEST.
  
 3. THIS PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH PROVISO:
  
 THE EXISTING DOOR IS SHOWN AS PERMANENTLY LOCKED. SEE
 FBC B 1008.1.9,
  
 THIS WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE FIELD INSPECTOR'S APPROVAL.
 IF THE DOOR LOOKS LIKE A DOOR, REMOVAL OF THE HARDWARE
 WILL NOT BE ADEQUATE TO RESOLVE THE COMMENT. IF
 APPLICANT IS ABLE TO MODIFY THE DOOR IN SUCH A WAY THAT
 IT IS CLEARLY NOT A DOOR, THAT IS ACCEPTABLE. A
 REVISION SHOWING MODIFICATIONS IMPLEMENTED MAY BE
 REQUIRED, SUBJECT TO FIELD INSPECTOR'S DISCRETION.
  
  
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2018-03-17 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2018-03-17 Time 12:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2018-03-17 Time 12:06 Sent To  
Notes
2018-03-17 12:16:10***CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014)
 FBC B = FBC BUILDING
 FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING
 FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY
 FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION
  
 1. THE EXISTING DOOR IS SHOWN AS PERMANENTLY LOCKED.
 SEE FBC B 1008.1.9,
  
 2ND REVIEW, PLAN WAS REVISED TO SHOW REMOVAL OF DOOR
 HARDWARE. THIS WAS NOT DISCUSSED PREVIOUS TO THE
 RESUBMITTAL AS STATED IN THE RESPONSE LETTER. THIS
 PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH PROVISO: THIS WILL BE
 SUBJECT TO THE FIELD INSPECTOR'S APPROVAL. IF THE DOOR
 LOOKS LIKE A DOOR, REMOVAL OF THE HARDWARE WILL NOT BE
 ADEQUATE TO RESOLVE THE COMMENT. IF APPLICANT IS ABLE
 TO MODIFY THE DOOR IN SUCH A WAY THAT IT IS CLEARLY NOT
 A DOOR, THAT IS ACCEPTABLE. A REVISION SHOWING
 MODIFICATIONS IMPLEMENTED MAY BE REQUIRED, SUBJECT TO
 FIELD INSPECTOR'S DISCRETION.
  
 9. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE CONTRACT FOR THIS JOB, FBC
 109.
  
 11. FBC 107, THE DESIGNER OF RECORD IS TO REVIEW
 PRODUCT APPROVALS AND DELEGATED ENGINEERING. A DOOR
 DETAIL SIGNED AND SEALED BY THOMAS TWOMEY, PE WAS
 INCLUDED AND DOES NOT INCLUDE PANIC DEVICES (STATES "NO
 PANIC") AND INCLUDES A LOCK, SEE FBC B 1008.
  
 3RD REVIEW, IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW THIS WAS ADDRESSED.
 SAME DETAIL PROVIDED, NO PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED.
 4TH REVIEW, SAME SPECS PROVIDED. A PANIC BAR IS
 REQUIRED FOR THE DOORS DUE TO ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY,
 OCCUPANT LOAD OVER 50. ENGINEER'S REVIEW OF A NON
 COMPLIANT DOOR DOES NOT ADDRESS 2ND HALF OF THE
 COMMENT.
  
 12. FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80, A 4X PLAN REVIEW FEE WILL
 BE ASSESSED IF COMMENTS NOT ADDRESSED A THIRD TIME.
  
 FEE IS REQUIRED TO BE ADDED PER FLORIDA STATUTE. DUE TO
 THE NUMBER OF TIMES THIS HAS BEEN RESUBMITTED WITHOUT
 COMMENTS BEING ADDRESSED, PLEASE REQUEST A
 PRE-RESUBMITTAL MEETING. THIS MAY BE THE APPLICANT AS A
 REVIEW WILL NOT BE DONE, BUT THE INDIVIDUAL SUBMITTING
 THE RESUBMITTAL MUST BE ABLE TO SHOW HOW EACH COMMENT
 WAS ADDRESSED.
  
 NEW COMMENT:
  
 IN A CONVERSATION WITH PETE RUSSO, I AGREED TO PASS THE
 REVIEW WITH PROVISO. SINCE AN ENTRY DOOR WITH PANIC BAR
 IS READILY AVAILABLE, BUT APPLICANT HAS NOT PROVIDED A
 PRODUCT APPROVAL OR PROPOSED INSTALLATION SPEC WHICH
 INCLUDES A PANIC DEVICE, I'M CONCERNED THAT THE
 INSTALLATION WILL BE DONE INCORRECTLY. TO MY BEST
 KNOWLEDGE, AN EXTERIOR IMPACT RATED TESTED DOOR
 ASSEMBLY CANNOT HAVE A PANIC BAR INSTALLED
 RETROACTIVELY WITHOUT VOIDING THE PRODUCT TESTING.
 THEREFORE, THIS INFORMATION IS REQUIRED AT THIS TIME.
 SUBJECT TO THE PLANS EXAMINER'S DISCRETION, PRODUCT
 APPROVALS FOR COMPONENTS & CLADDING CAN BE DEFERRED
 SUBMITTALS, ESPECIALLY FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION. THIS IS A
 MINOR ALTERATION, THE DOOR INSTALLATION IS A
 SIGNIFICANT PART OF THE PROJECT, AND THE CODE IS
 RESTRICTIVE. I DO NOT FEEL THAT A PROVISO FOR THIS ITEM
 IS APPROPRIATE. PLEASE CONTACT ME TO DISCUSS IF YOU
 WOULD LIKE FOR ME TO TAKE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
 INTO CONSIDERATION.
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2018-01-12 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2018-01-12 Time 17:27 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2018-01-10 Time 07:39 Sent To  
Notes
2018-01-12 17:27:33***CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014)
 FBC B = FBC BUILDING
 FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING
 FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY
 FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION
  
 1. THE EXISTING DOOR IS SHOWN AS PERMANENTLY LOCKED.
 SEE FBC B 1008.1.9,
  
 9. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE CONTRACT FOR THIS JOB, FBC
 109.
  
 11. FBC 107, THE DESIGNER OF RECORD IS TO REVIEW
 PRODUCT APPROVALS AND DELEGATED ENGINEERING. A DOOR
 DETAIL SIGNED AND SEALED BY THOMAS TWOMEY, PE WAS
 INCLUDED AND DOES NOT INCLUDE PANIC DEVICES (STATES "NO
 PANIC") AND INCLUDES A LOCK, SEE FBC B 1008.
  
 3RD REVIEW, IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW THIS WAS ADDRESSED.
 SAME DETAIL PROVIDED, NO PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED.
  
 12. FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80, A 4X PLAN REVIEW FEE WILL
 BE ASSESSED IF COMMENTS NOT ADDRESSED A THIRD TIME.
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2017-09-14 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-09-14 Time 08:59 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-09-14 Time 08:01 Sent To  
Notes
2017-09-14 09:00:01****HOLDS HAVE BEEN PLACED ON UNITS 26, 27, 28 - NO
 PERMITS OR BUSINESS TAX TO BE ISSUED UNTIL THE EXITING
 ISSUE HAS BEEN RESOLVED - PERMIT AND BUSINESS TAX
 RECEIPT APPLICATIONS MAY BE SUBMITTED BUT WILL NOT BE
 ISSUED UNTIL THE EXITING ISSUE IS RESOLVED, SEE COMMENT
 #3****
  
 ****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014)
 FBC B = FBC BUILDING
 FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING
 FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY
 FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION
  
 1-2. OK
  
 3. COMMENT FROM PREVIOUS LIST: THIS RESTAURANT AREA
 PREVIOUSLY OCCUPIED UNITS 26, 27, AND 28 (WALL
 SEPARATING UNITS 27 AND 28 REMOVED WITH PERMIT
 12060109, COMBINED UNITS 26-28 RENOVATED INTO ONE
 RESTAURANT). UNIT 28 THEN PROVIDED THE REQUIRED SECOND
 EXIT.
  
 PERMIT #17010091, PLAN PREPARED BY MARK S. BEATTY
 AR92184 WAS SUBMITTED AND ISSUED TO SEPARATE UNIT 28
 FROM UNITS 26/27. THE PLAN DID NOT SHOW EXISTING
 OCCUPANCY OR ROOM DESIGNATIONS. THIS PERMIT CREATED A
 LIFE SAFETY ISSUE WHICH MUST BE CORRECTED BEFORE UNITS
 26/27 CAN BE OCCUPIED.
  
 THE DINING AREA, WITH AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF 151, HAS BEEN
 DESIGNED TO HAVE ONLY ONE COMPLIANT EXIT, TWO REQUIRED.
  
 PAPA RECORDS SHOW YEAR BUILT AS 1987. STANDARD BUILDING
 CODE 1982 (ALSO SBC1985, SBC1988) REQUIREMENTS WERE
 SIMILAR TO CURRENT CODE - TWO EXITS REQUIRED, EXITING
 THROUGH KITCHENS PROHIBITED.
  
 IT IS NOT CLEAR WHY PERMIT 17010091 DID NOT DISCLOSE
 THAT INSTALLATION OF A WALL CREATED AN EXITING ISSUE,
 AND WHY PERMIT APPLICATION 17060359 DID NOT CORRECT THE
 LIFE SAFETY VIOLATION.
  
 2ND REVIEW, NO RESPONSE LETTER WAS PROVIDED. THE PLAN
 SHOWS THE AREA WHICH WAS FORMERLY PART OF THE
 RESTAURANT AS MERCANTILE, WAS A CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY
 APPLIED FOR AND ISSUED?
  
 THE NEW PLAN SHOWS A 2ND PROPOSED EXIT WHICH DOES NOT
 APPEAR TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF FBC B 1015.2.1.
 REVISE.
  
 5. OK
  
 6. PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE BAR SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH
 FBC A 226, 902.
  
 2ND REVIEW, IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW THIS WAS ADDRESSED.
  
 7. EVIDENCE THAT THE ADVANCED FLORIDA BUILDING CODE
 COURSE WAS TAKEN IS REQUIRED TO BE SENT TO FBPE SO THAT
 THE DBPR WEBSITE CAN BE UPDATED (JAMES BIAGI,PE),
 PLEASE ADDRESS PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL, FS471.0195. THIS
 COMMENT DOES NOT PREVENT THIS PERMIT FROM BEING ISSUED.
  
 2ND REVIEW, THIS ENGINEER'S DBPR RECORD HAS NOT BEEN
 UPDATED. FAILURE TO HAVE IT UPDATED WILL RESULT IN
 REPORT TO FBPE AS REQUIRED BY FS471.0195.
  
 PLEASE REFER ENGINEER TO THIS WEBSITE:
  
 HTTPS://FBPE.ORG/FLORIDA-APPROVED-ADVANCED-BUILDING-COD
 E-COURSE-PROVIDERS/#
  
 8. SHEET A1 SHOWS THIS UNIT AS IN THE "NORTH WEST
 WING"' NOT CLEAR WHAT THIS MEANS. REVISE THE PLANS AND
 APPLICATION TO INCLUDE UNIT NUMBERS. BASED ON THE
 PHOTOGRAPH, I WAS ABLE TO DETERMINE THAT THIS IS LIKELY
 THE UNITS REFERENCED IN COMMENT #3, WHICH ARE IN THE
 CENTER OF THE STRIP MALL. IT HAS AN EAST/WEST
 ORIENTATION, NOT CLEAR HOW THIS IS IN A "NORTH WEST
 WING."
  
 2ND REVIEW, IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW THIS WAS ADDRESSED.
  
 9. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE CONTRACT FOR THIS JOB, FBC
 109.
  
 NEW COMMENTS:
  
 10. THIS IS NOT A LEVEL 1 ALTERATION AS THE PREVIOUS
 ALTERATION (RECONFIGURATION OF WALLS) CREATED A
 CONDITION WHICH DID NOT COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE. REVISE; THIS IS A LEVEL II ALTERATION,
 FBC EB 504. WHEN A PLAN IS SEVERELY DEFICIENT (MARK S.
 BEATTY AR92184) AND LEADS TO A PERMIT ISSUED IN ERROR
 DUE TO LACK OF PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PLAN, AND
 THAT PLAN DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE CODE IN EFFECT AT
 THE TIME OF ISSUANCE, YOU CANNOT CONSIDER THIS WORK
 "EXISTING".
  
 PLEASE HAVE MR. BEATTY CONTACT ME; IS HE AWARE OF THIS
 ISSUE?
  
 11. FBC 107, THE DESIGNER OF RECORD IS TO REVIEW
 PRODUCT APPROVALS AND DELEGATED ENGINEERING. A DOOR
 DETAIL SIGNED AND SEALED BY THOMAS TWOMEY, PE WAS
 INCLUDED AND DOES NOT INCLUDE PANIC DEVICES (STATES "NO
 PANIC") AND INCLUDES A LOCK, SEE FBC B 1008. THE DBPR
 RECORD FOR THIS ENGINEER ALSO DOES NOT REFLECT THAT HE
 HAS TAKEN THE ADVANCED FBC COURSE; SEND EVIDENCE
 DIRECTLY TO FBPE TO RESOLVE.
  
 PLEASE REFER MR. TWOMEY TO THIS SITE:
  
 HTTPS://FBPE.ORG/FLORIDA-APPROVED-ADVANCED-BUILDING-COD
 E-COURSE-PROVIDERS/#
  
 12. FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80, A 4X PLAN REVIEW FEE WILL
 BE ASSESSED IF COMMENTS NOT ADDRESSED A THIRD TIME.
  
 13. REVISE APPLICATION TO INCLUDE UNIT NUMBER(S), FBC
 107.
  
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2017-06-13 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-06-13 Time 12:03 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-06-12 Time 10:32 Sent To  
Notes
2017-06-13 12:03:39****HOLDS HAVE BEEN PLACED ON UNITS 26, 27, 28 - NO
 PERMITS OR BUSINESS TAX TO BE ISSUED UNTIL THE EXITING
 ISSUE HAS BEEN RESOLVED - PERMIT AND BUSINESS TAX
 RECEIPT APPLICATIONS MAY BE SUBMITTED BUT WILL NOT BE
 ISSUED UNTIL THE EXITING ISSUE IS RESOLVED, SEE COMMENT
 #3****
  
 ****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014)
 FBC B = FBC BUILDING
 FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING
 FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY
 FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION
  
 1. P1 HAS INCORRECT JOB INFORMATION IN THE TITLE BLOCK,
 REVISE.
  
 2. THIS PROPERTY HAS A NUMBER OF EXPIRED PERMITS,
 PLEASE CONTACT [email protected] TO RESOLVE. PLEASE
 ADVISE AS TO ACTION PROPOSED TO GET THE EXPIRED PERMITS
 CLOSED. PERMITS AND APPLICATIONS EXPIRE AFTER 180 DAYS
 OF INACTIVITY; NOTE THAT SOME PERMITS OR PERMIT
 APPLICATIONS MAY BE EXPIRED EVEN IF OUR SYSTEM SHOW
 THEM IN "OPEN" STATUS RATHER THAN "EXPIRED".
  
 3. THIS RESTAURANT AREA PREVIOUSLY OCCUPIED UNITS 26,
 27, AND 28 (WALL SEPARATING UNITS 27 AND 28 REMOVED
 WITH PERMIT 12060109, COMBINED UNITS 26-28 RENOVATED
 INTO ONE RESTAURANT). UNIT 28 THEN PROVIDED THE
 REQUIRED SECOND EXIT.
  
 PERMIT #17010091, PLAN PREPARED BY MARK S. BEATTY
 AR92184 WAS SUBMITTED AND ISSUED TO SEPARATE UNIT 28
 FROM UNITS 26/27. THE PLAN DID NOT SHOW EXISTING
 OCCUPANCY OR ROOM DESIGNATIONS. THIS PERMIT CREATED A
 LIFE SAFETY ISSUE WHICH MUST BE CORRECTED BEFORE UNITS
 26/27 CAN BE OCCUPIED.
  
 THE DINING AREA, WITH AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF 151, HAS BEEN
 DESIGNED TO HAVE ONLY ONE COMPLIANT EXIT, TWO REQUIRED.
  
 PAPA RECORDS SHOW YEAR BUILT AS 1987. STANDARD BUILDING
 CODE 1982 (ALSO SBC1985, SBC1988) REQUIREMENTS WERE
 SIMILAR TO CURRENT CODE - TWO EXITS REQUIRED, EXITING
 THROUGH KITCHENS PROHIBITED.
  
 IT IS NOT CLEAR WHY PERMIT 17010091 DID NOT DISCLOSE
 THAT INSTALLATION OF A WALL CREATED AN EXITING ISSUE,
 AND WHY PERMIT APPLICATION 17060359 DID NOT CORRECT THE
 LIFE SAFETY VIOLATION.
  
 5. THE SEATING PLAN ON A4 DOES NOT INCLUDE AN
 ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, FBC A CHAPTER 4, COMPLIANCE WITH
 ACCESSIBLE SEATING REQUIREMENTS NOT SHOWN. ALTHOUGH
 THIS REVIEW DOES NOT COVER MOVEABLE SEATS, A PLAN WHICH
 OBVIOUSLY DOES NOT COMPLY WITH FEDERAL LAW CANNOT BE
 STAMPED AS APPROVED.
  
 6. PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE BAR SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH
 FBC A 226, 902.
  
 7. EVIDENCE THAT THE ADVANCED FLORIDA BUILDING CODE
 COURSE WAS TAKEN IS REQUIRED TO BE SENT TO FBPE SO THAT
 THE DBPR WEBSITE CAN BE UPDATED (JAMES BIAGI,PE),
 PLEASE ADDRESS PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL, FS471.0195. THIS
 COMMENT DOES NOT PREVENT THIS PERMIT FROM BEING ISSUED.
  
 8. SHEET A1 SHOWS THIS UNIT AS IN THE "NORTH WEST
 WING"' NOT CLEAR WHAT THIS MEANS. REVISE THE PLANS AND
 APPLICATION TO INCLUDE UNIT NUMBERS. BASED ON THE
 PHOTOGRAPH, I WAS ABLE TO DETERMINE THAT THIS IS LIKELY
 THE UNITS REFERENCED IN COMMENT #3, WHICH ARE IN THE
 CENTER OF THE STRIP MALL. IT HAS AN EAST/WEST
 ORIENTATION, NOT CLEAR HOW THIS IS IN A "NORTH WEST
 WING."
  
 9. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE CONTRACT FOR THIS JOB, FBC
 109.
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2018-04-30 Cont ID  
Sent By jpearson Date 2018-04-30 Time 16:24 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jpearson Date 2018-04-30 Time 16:15 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2018-03-12 Cont ID  
Sent By jpearson Date 2018-03-12 Time 17:05 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jpearson Date 2018-03-12 Time 17:05 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2017-08-31 Cont ID  
Sent By jpearson Date 2017-08-31 Time 13:50 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jpearson Date 2017-08-31 Time 13:50 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2017-06-12 Cont ID  
Sent By jpearson Date 2017-06-12 Time 08:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jpearson Date 2017-06-12 Time 08:28 Sent To  
Notes
2017-06-12 09:05:48CODES IN EFFECT:
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2014 5TH EDITION
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ENERGY CONSERVATION 2014 5TH
 EDITION
 NFPA 70 2011 EDITION, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE
  
 ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. SHEET E1, ELECTRICAL NOTES > MATERIALS. THERE ARE
 SEVERAL ITEMS LISTED THAT DO NOT APPLY TO THE
 ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION. PLEASE REMOVE INFORMATION THAT
 IS NOT RELEVANT OR USED FOR THE ELECTRICAL PLAN. FBC
 107.2.1
 2. PROVIDE RISER DIAGRAM. THE ELECTRICAL PLAN SHOWS TWO
 200 AMP PANELS (A & B), BUT THERE IS ONLY ONE AREA
 INDICATED FOR A 200 AMP SERVICE ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE
 BUILDING. PLEASE CLARIFY AND/OR CORRECT. NEC 215.5, FBC
 107.2.1
 3. PANEL A, CIRCUITS 2,4 AND 6,8 SHOW A #12 WIRE ON A
 30 AMP BREAKER. PROVIDE CORRECTION. NEC 240.4;
 310.15(B)(16)
 4. PANEL A, CIRCUIT 10 SHOWS A #12 WIRE ON A 25 AMP
 BREAKER. PROVIDE CORRECTION. NEC 240.4; 310.15(B)(16)
 5. PROVIDE DETAIL FOR METHOD OF FAN CONTROL SPECIFIED
 IN ELECTRICAL NOTE>ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR>D. FBC
 107.2.1; FBC MECH. 503.1
 6. SHOW ON PLAN GFCI PROTECTION FOR ALL OUTLETS IN
 KITCHEN AND BAR AREAS. NEC 210.8(B)(2)
 7. IDENTIFY RTU LOCATIONS(WITH UNIQUE IDENTIFICATION)
 AND THE CIRCUITS THAT FEED THEM. CURRENTLY, THE
 CIRCUITS ARE MARKED AS FED FROM PANEL A, WHICH DOES NOT
 CORRESPOND WITH THE PANEL SCHEDULE. GFCI CONVENIENCE
 OUTLET CIRCUITS ARE NOT IDENTIFIED. FBC 107.2.1, NEC
 210.63, 210.8
 8. SHOW ON PLAN THE LOCATION OF REQUIRED SHOW WINDOW
 OUTLETS AND SIGN CIRCUIT. PROVIDE DETAIL OF AUTOMATIC
 CONTROL OF THESE ITEMS. FBC 107.2.1; FBC C405.2.2 AND
 C405.2.4
 9. ON SHEET E1 THERE IS A J-BOX WITH CIRCUITS B-17,19
 LOCATED IN THE KITCHEN. PROVIDE CLARIFICATION. IS THIS
 A POWER CIRCUIT FOR SOMETHING, OR A LIGHTING CIRCUIT AS
 THE PANEL SCHEDULE INDICATES? FBC 107.2.1
 10. PROVIDE DETAILS OF LIGHTING CONTROL FOR DINING ROOM
 AND BAR AREA. FBC C405.2.2.1
 11. PROVIDE DETAIL SHOWING THAT THE LIGHTING ALLOWANCE
 PER THE ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE IS MET. YOU CURRENTLY
 HAVE A NOTE THAT STATES THE SYSTEM IS DESIGNED PER 2014
 ENERGY CONSERVATION SECTION 505, WHICH DOES NOT EXIST.
 FBC C405.5.2
 12. PROVIDE DETAIL OF SHUT DOWN FOR ANY ELECTRICAL
 EQUIPMENT UNDER THE HOOD. FBC MECHANICAL 503.1; NFPA 96
  
 PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED
 MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. WHEN
 RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE
 LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY
 RESUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, INSERT CORRECTED PAGES
 INTO THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE OR VOID THE
 PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS.
  
 SINCERELY,
  
 JOHN PEARSON
 ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER
 561-805-6746
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 5 Status P Date 2018-05-01 Cont ID  
Sent By scaldero Date 2018-05-01 Time 12:03 Rev Time 0.00
Received By scaldero Date 2018-05-01 Time 12:03 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2018-03-12 Cont ID  
Sent By scaldero Date 2018-03-12 Time 11:58 Rev Time 0.00
Received By scaldero Date 2018-03-09 Time 11:22 Sent To  
Notes
2018-03-12 11:57:12PERMIT # 17060359
 REVIEW COMMENTS - FIRE DEPARTMENT
 4TH REVIEW
  
 4TH REVIEW - SAME COMMENT
 1) SHEET A4: THE OCCUPANT LOAD AND SEATING PROVIDED DO
 NOT MATCH AND DO NOT APPEAR TO COMPLY WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 1 AND NFPA 101.
 THE SEATING LAYOUT HAS BEEN ADJUSTED, HOWEVER THE
 OCCUPANT LOAD CALCULATIONS CONTINUE TO NOT APPEAR
 CORRECT. FOR EXAMPLE, THE OCCUPANT LOAD CALCULATION
 SHOWS NON-FIXED SEATING AS HAVING AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF
 51. HOWEVER, SEATING FOR 83 PERSONS IS PROVIDED.
 SEATING SHALL COMPLY FULLY WITH PERTINENT FIRE AND
 BUILDING CODES. THE OCCUPANT LOAD FOR THIS SPACE IS 101
 PERSONS. THE SEATING AND STAFF DETAILS SHOULD MATCH
 THIS. PLEASE PROVIDE PROPER JUSTIFICATION FOR OCCUPANT
 LOAD PERMITTED AND SEATING PROVIDED.
  
 2) ADDRESSED IN THIS REVIEW.
  
 3) ADDRESSED IN THIS SUBMISSION.
  
 4)SAME COMMENT - 2ND TIME:
 SHEETS A4 AND E2 DO NOT MATCH. ONE OF THE NEW
 ENTRY/EXIT DOORS AND EXIT SIGNS IS NOT SHOWN ON SHEET
 E2. SHEET E2 CONTINUES TO SHOW CENTER DOORS AS
 EMERGENCY EGREES DOORS. PLEASE UPDATE SHEET E2.
  
 5) NOTE: NEW SEATING LAYOUT SHOWS POTENTIAL FOR EGRESS
 DOOR OBSTRUCTION DUE TO PROXIMITY OF SEATS TO DOOR.
 PLEASE REVIEW. THIS MAY BE CORRECTED WITH PROPER
 SPACING OF SEATS, AS THIS ROW OF SEATS DOES NOT APPEAR
 TO BE EQUALLY SPACED OUT.
  
  
  
  
 SUE ELLEN CALDERON
 ASSISTANT FIRE MARSHAL
 OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL
 WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE
 [email protected]
 (561) 644-7326
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2018-01-22 Cont ID  
Sent By scaldero Date 2018-01-22 Time 16:31 Rev Time 0.00
Received By scaldero Date 2018-01-22 Time 15:48 Sent To I
Notes
2018-01-22 16:31:54PERMIT # 17060359
 REVIEW COMMENTS - FIRE DEPARTMENT
 3RD REVIEW
  
 3RD REVIEW - SAME COMMENT
 1) SHEET A4: THE DINING ROOM SEATING LAYOUT APPEARS
 OVER CONCENTRATED. THE "OCCUPANCY TAB" INDICATES THAT
 THE DINING & BAR AREA WAS CALCULATED AS 1584 SQ FT /
 13. HOWEVER, PER NFPA 1, TABLE 14.8.1.2, THE
 CALCULATION SHOULD BE
 1584 SQ FT / 15 FOR AN OCCUPANCY OF 105. THERE ARE
 ABOUT 14 SEATS OVER PERMITTED OCCUPANCY.
 PLEASE ALSO CONFIRM SEATING LAYOUT COMPLIES WITH NFPA
 101: CHAPTER 12 - NEW ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCIES;
 SPECIFICALLY SECTIONS 12.2.5.7 AND 12.2.5.8, AISLE
 ACCESSWAYS AND AISLES SERVING SEATING AT TABLES.
  
  
 2) 2ND REVIEW - SAME COMMENT:
 *** INCLUDE THE DIMENSIONS THAT SUPPORT YOUR COMPLIANCE
 OF THE CODE REQUIREMENT LISTED BELOW. THE DIMENSIONS
 FOR THE OVERALL DIAGONAL DIMENSION OF THE BUILDING OR
 AREA TO BE SERVED IS NOT PROVIDED. NEITHER IS THE
 SEPARATION DISTANCE FOR THE TWO NEW ENTRY/EXIT
 DOORS.****
 THE REMOTENESS BETWEEN THE REQUIRED EXITS SHALL COMPLY
 WITH THE FOLLOWING:
 7.5.1.3 REMOTENESS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 7.5.1.3.1 THROUGH 7.5.1.3.7.
 7.5.1.3.1 WHERE MORE THAN ONE EXIT, EXIT ACCESS, OR
 EXIT DISCHARGE IS REQUIRED FROM A BUILDING OR PORTION
 THEREOF, SUCH EXITS, EXIT ACCESSES, OR EXIT DISCHARGES
 SHALL BE REMOTELY LOCATED FROM EACH OTHER AND BE
 ARRANGED TO MINIMIZE THE POSSIBILITY THAT MORE THAN ONE
 HAS THE POTENTIAL TO BE BLOCKED BY ANY ONE FIRE OR
 OTHER EMERGENCY CONDITION.
 7.5.1.3.2* WHERE TWO EXITS, EXIT ACCESSES, OR EXIT
 DISCHARGES ARE REQUIRED, THEY SHALL BE LOCATED AT A
 DISTANCE FROM ONE ANOTHER NOT LESS THAN ONE-HALF THE
 LENGTH OF THE MAXIMUM OVERALL DIAGONAL DIMENSION OF THE
 BUILDING OR AREA TO BE SERVED, MEASURED IN A STRAIGHT
 LINE BETWEEN THE NEAREST EDGE OF THE EXITS, EXIT
 ACCESSES, OR EXIT DISCHARGES, UNLESS OTHERWISE PROVIDED
 IN 7.5.1.3.3 THROUGH 7.5.1.3.5.
 7.5.1.3.3 IN BUILDINGS PROTECTED THROUGHOUT BY AN
 APPROVED, SUPERVISED AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.7, THE MINIMUM SEPARATION
 DISTANCE BETWEEN TWO EXITS, EXIT ACCESSES, OR EXIT
 DISCHARGES, MEASURED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 7.5.1.3.2,
 SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN ONE-THIRD THE LENGTH OF THE
 MAXIMUM OVERALL DIAGONAL DIMENSION OF THE BUILDING OR
 AREA TO BE SERVED.
  
 3) PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THIS SUITE IS PROTECTED WITH AN
 APPROVED FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND/OR FIRE ALARM SYSTEM
 AND THAT A PERMIT WILL BE APPLIED FOR DUE TO ANY AND
 ALL CHANGES MADE TO THOSE SYSTEMS. SHEET A4 HAS
 CONFLICTING INFORMATION AS IT STATES THAT THERE WILL BE
 NO CHANGES, HOWEVER THERE ARE PORTIONS OF THE SUITE
 THAT HAVE WALLS BEING REMOVED OR ADDED, PER SHEETS A2
 AND A3....THIS WILL AFFECT FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE
 ALARM COVERAGE.
  
 4) NEW COMMENT:
 SHEETS A4 AND E2 DO NOT MATCH. ONE OF THE NEW
 ENTRY/EXIT DOORS AND EXIT SIGNS IS NOT SHOWN ON SHEET
 E2. PLEASE UPDATE SHEET E2.
  
  
  
  
 SUE ELLEN CALDERON
 ASSISTANT FIRE MARSHAL
 OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL
 WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE
 [email protected]
 (561) 644-7326
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2017-09-14 Cont ID  
Sent By scaldero Date 2017-09-14 Time 11:05 Rev Time 0.00
Received By scaldero Date 2017-09-14 Time 11:05 Sent To I
Notes
2017-09-14 11:05:44PERMIT # 17060359
 REVIEW COMMENTS - FIRE DEPARTMENT
 2ND REVIEW
  
 2ND REVIEW - SAME COMMENT
 1) SHEET A4: THE DINING ROOM SEATING LAYOUT APPEARS
 OVER CONCENTRATED. PLEASE CONFIRM SEATING LAYOUT
 COMPLIES WITH NFPA 101: CHAPTER 12 - NEW ASSEMBLY
 OCCUPANCIES; SPECIFICALLY SECTIONS 12.2.5.7 AND
 12.2.5.8, AISLE ACCESSWAYS AND AISLES SERVING SEATING
 AT TABLES.
 DOES NOT APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED FROM THE 1ST
 REVIEW, NO NOTES OR NARRATIVE PROVIDED WITH
 RESUBMISSION.
  
 2ND REVIEW - SAME COMMENT
 2) SHEET A4; TWO MEANS OF EGRESS ARE REQUIRED FOR
 ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCIES. PER NFPA 101, SECTION 7.5.2.1,
 ACCESS TO AN EXIT SHALL NOT BE THROUGH KITCHENS,
 STOREROOMS OTHER THAN AS PROVIDED IN CHAPTERS 36 AND
 37, RESTROOMS, WORKROOMS, CLOSETS, BEDROOMS OR SIMILAR
 SPACES, OR OTHER ROOMS OR SPACES SUBJECT TO LOCKING.
 DOES NOT APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED FROM THE 1ST
 REVIEW, NO NOTES OR NARRATIVE PROVIDED WITH
 RESUBMISSION.
  
 3) NEW COMMENT: THE REMOTENESS BETWEEN THE REQUIRED
 EXITS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING:
 7.5.1.3 REMOTENESS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 7.5.1.3.1 THROUGH 7.5.1.3.7.
 7.5.1.3.1 WHERE MORE THAN ONE EXIT, EXIT ACCESS, OR
 EXIT DISCHARGE IS REQUIRED FROM A BUILDING OR PORTION
 THEREOF, SUCH EXITS, EXIT ACCESSES, OR EXIT DISCHARGES
 SHALL BE REMOTELY LOCATED FROM EACH OTHER AND BE
 ARRANGED TO MINIMIZE THE POSSIBILITY THAT MORE THAN ONE
 HAS THE POTENTIAL TO BE BLOCKED BY ANY ONE FIRE OR
 OTHER
 EMERGENCY CONDITION.
 7.5.1.3.2* WHERE TWO EXITS, EXIT ACCESSES, OR EXIT
 DISCHARGES ARE REQUIRED, THEY SHALL BE LOCATED AT A
 DISTANCE FROM ONE ANOTHER NOT LESS THAN ONE-HALF THE
 LENGTH OF THE MAXIMUM OVERALL DIAGONAL DIMENSION OF THE
 BUILDING OR AREA TO BE SERVED, MEASURED IN A STRAIGHT
 LINE BETWEEN THE NEAREST EDGE OF THE EXITS, EXIT
 ACCESSES,
 OR EXIT DISCHARGES, UNLESS OTHERWISE PROVIDED IN
 7.5.1.3.3 THROUGH 7.5.1.3.5.
 7.5.1.3.3 IN BUILDINGS PROTECTED THROUGHOUT BY AN
 APPROVED, SUPERVISED AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.7, THE MINIMUM SEPARATION
 DISTANCE BETWEEN TWO EXITS, EXIT ACCESSES, OR EXIT
 DISCHARGES, MEASURED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 7.5.1.3.2,
 SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN ONE-THIRD THE LENGTH OF THE
 MAXIMUM OVERALL
 DIAGONAL DIMENSION OF THE BUILDING OR AREA TO BE
 SERVED.
  
 4) IF FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM MODIFICATIONS
 ARE REQUIRED SEPARATE PLANS AND PERMITS WILL BE
 REQUIRED FOR THAT WORK.
  
 2ND REVIEW - SAME COMMENT
 5) PLEASE REVIEW AND RESPOND TO BUILDING DEPT.
 COMMENTS.
  
  
 SUE ELLEN CALDERON
 ASSISTANT FIRE MARSHAL
 OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL
 WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE
 [email protected]
 (561) 644-7326
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2017-06-14 Cont ID  
Sent By scaldero Date 2017-06-14 Time 15:30 Rev Time 0.00
Received By scaldero Date 2017-06-14 Time 14:13 Sent To  
Notes
2017-06-14 15:30:10PERMIT # 17060359
 REVIEW COMMENTS - FIRE DEPARTMENT
  
 1) SHEET A4: THE DINING ROOM SEATING LAYOUT APPEARS
 OVER CONCENTRATED. PLEASE CONFIRM SEATING LAYOUT
 COMPLIES WITH NFPA 101: CHAPTER 12 - NEW ASSEMBLY
 OCCUPANCIES; SPECIFICALLY SECTIONS 12.2.5.7 AND
 12.2.5.8, AISLE ACCESSWAYS AND AISLES SERVING SEATING
 AT TABLES.
  
 2) SHEET A4; TWO MEANS OF EGRESS ARE REQUIRED FOR
 ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCIES. PER NFPA 101, SECTION 7.5.2.1,
 ACCESS TO AN EXIT SHALL NOT BE THROUGH KITCHENS,
 STOREROOMS OTHER THAN AS PROVIDED IN CHAPTERS 36 AND
 37, RESTROOMS, WORKROOMS, CLOSETS, BEDROOMS OR SIMILAR
 SPACES, OR OTHER ROOMS OR SPACES SUBJECT TO LOCKING.
  
 3) IF FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM MODIFICATIONS
 ARE REQUIRED SEPARATE PLANS AND PERMITS WILL BE
 REQUIRED FOR THAT WORK.
  
 4) PLEASE REVIEW AND RESPOND TO BUILDING DEPT.
 COMMENTS.
  
  
  
 SUE ELLEN CALDERON
 ASSISTANT FIRE MARSHAL
 OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL
 WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE
 [email protected]
 (561) 644-7326
  
Review Stop G GAS REVIEW
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2018-04-30 Cont ID  
Sent By gjohnson Date 2018-04-30 Time 10:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By gjohnson Date 2018-04-30 Time 10:17 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop G GAS REVIEW
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2018-03-17 Cont ID  
Sent By lcrespo Date 2018-03-17 Time 14:27 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lcrespo Date 2018-03-17 Time 14:27 Sent To  
Notes
2018-03-17 14:32:11GAS PLAN REVIEW DENIED,
 A GAS PLAN HAS BEEN INCLUDED IN THIS SUBMITTAL PACKAGE.
 A GAS PLAN REVIEW HAS NOT BEEN PERFORMED AT THIS TIME.
 A SEPARATE GAS PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR A CONTRACTOR
 TO PERFORM THE RELATED WORK. WPB AMENDMENTS TO FBC SEC.
 107.2.1.
  
 1. 2ND REQUEST, WITH THE GAS WATER HEATER NOW BEING IN
 A CLOSET PLEASE PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE WATER
 HEATER AND THE REQUIRED MAKE UP AIR FOR THE ROOM TO
 COMPLY WITH 2014 FBC FG SEC. 304. FBC 102.7.1
 2. 2ND REQUEST, PLEASE PROVIDE THE SIZING TABLE USED IN
 SIZING SYSTEM FROM 2014 FBC FG 402.
 3. 2ND REQUEST, THE COMBUSTION AIR CALCULATIONS SHOW A
 TOTAL BTU LOAD OF 166,000 THE PLAN SHOWS 589,000 PLEASE
 PROVIDE AN ACCURATE COMBUSTION AIR CALCULATION. PER
 2014 FBC FG 304.
  
 PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED
 MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. WHEN
 RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE
 LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY
 RESUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, INSERT CORRECTED PAGES
 INTO THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE OR VOID THE
 PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS.
  
 LUIS A. CRESPO
 PLUMBING INSPECTOR /
 PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW
 [email protected]
 561-805-6720
  
  
Review Stop G GAS REVIEW
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2018-01-22 Cont ID  
Sent By gjohnson Date 2018-01-22 Time 10:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By gjohnson Date 2018-01-22 Time 10:55 Sent To  
Notes
2018-01-22 11:14:381ST REVIEW: FBC 2014 5TH EDITION
  
 GAS COMMENTS: THE EXISTING GAS SYSTEM SHALL BE SIZED TO
 ACCOMMODATE NEW BTU LOAD.
  
 1. PLEASE INDICATE ON THE GAS RISER THE SYSTEM PRESSURE
 AND TYPE OF PIPE BEING USED. PER WPB AMEND TO FBC
 107.2.1
  
 2. SHOW THE DISTANCE FROM THE POINT OF DELIVERY,
 (METER), TO THE MOST REMOTE OUTLET IN THE BUILDING
 AND/OR SYSTEM PER THE FBC-2014 FUEL GAS APPENDIX A ?
 USE OF CAPACITY SECTION A.3.1(4) & 2014 FUEL GAS CODE
 SEC. 402.4.1.
  
 3. ON THE GAS RISER NEXT TO THE NEW FRYER IT SHOWS EX.
 1/2" CWL STOVE WHAT IS THIS FOR IT IS NOT SHOWN ON THE
 PLAN OR EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE PLEASE CLARIFY. PER WPB
 AMEND TO FBC 107.2.1
  
 4. THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT MANUFACTURE SPEC SHEETS FOR
 THE FRYER PLEASE CLARIFY WHICH MANUFACTURE AND MODEL #
 IS BEING USED. PER WPB AMEND TO FBC 107.2.1
  
 5. THE COMBUSTION AIR CALCULATIONS SHOWS A TOTAL BTU
 LOAD OF 166,000 THE PLAN SHOWS 589,000 PLEASE PROVIDE
 AN ACCURATE COMBUSTION AIR CALCULATION. PER FBC FG 304
  
 6. THE EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE SHOWS THE FRYER AS EXISTING
 THE PLAN SHOWS IT AS NEW PLEASE CLARIFY. PER WPB AMEND
 TO FBC 107.2.1
  
 7. PLEASE PROVIDE THE SIZING TABLE USED IN SIZING
 SYSTEM FROM FBC FG 402
  
 8. IS THERE A ANSUL SYSTEM EXITING PLEASE INDICATE ON
 RISER . PER WPB AMEND TO FBC 107.2.1
  
  
  
 PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED
 MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS.
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE
 LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY
 RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. PLEASE, ADDITIONALLY, INSERT
 CORRECTED PAGES INTO TO SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE OR VOID
 THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS.
  
 GEORGE JOHNSON
 PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
  561-805-6711
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 5 Status N Date 2018-05-03 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2018-05-01 Time 16:18 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2018-04-20 Time 14:45 Sent To  
Notes
2018-04-23 14:46:04B29
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2018-03-17 Cont ID  
Sent By lcrespo Date 2018-03-17 Time 14:27 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lcrespo Date 2018-03-06 Time 14:18 Sent To  
Notes
2018-03-07 14:18:07B16
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2018-02-12 Cont ID  
Sent By lmarchan Date 2018-02-12 Time 10:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmarchan Date 2018-01-03 Time 16:16 Sent To  
Notes
2018-01-04 16:17:05B25
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2017-09-14 Cont ID  
Sent By cpuell Date 2017-09-14 Time 12:57 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cpuell Date 2017-08-29 Time 13:52 Sent To  
Notes
2017-08-30 13:53:03B21
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 2017-06-15 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmarchan Date 2017-06-08 Time 16:13 Sent To  
Notes
2017-06-09 16:13:30B19
Review Stop IMPACT COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2017-06-13 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-06-13 Time 12:05 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-06-13 Time 12:05 Sent To  
Notes
2017-06-13 12:06:12IMPACT FEE ISSUE ADDRESSED UNDER PERMIT 12060109 (NO
 FEES DUE PER MICHELLE B. PALM BEACH COUNTY)
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 5 Status P Date 2018-04-25 Cont ID  
Sent By ccole Date 2018-04-25 Time 17:32 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ccole Date 2018-04-25 Time 17:32 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2018-03-13 Cont ID  
Sent By ccole Date 2018-03-13 Time 12:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ccole Date 2018-03-13 Time 12:53 Sent To  
Notes
2018-03-13 13:27:514TH REVIEW FBC-2014 MECHANICAL, WEST PALM BEACH
 AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC
 PERMIT #17060359
 3/13/18
  
 PLAN REVIEW RESULTS: DENIED.
  
 1) M1: THE RTU EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE
 PLAN SHEETS SHOWS 3 EXISTING 5-TON SYSTEMS, HOWEVER THE
 EQUIPMENT SCHEDULES AT THE THE CENTERTOP OF THE SHEET
 SHOW EXISTING 5-TON AND 3.5 TON SYSTEMS, AND ONE NEW
 5-TON SYSTEM- SECTION 107.2.1 WPB AMENDMENTS
  
 2) M1: THE AIR BALANCE CALCULATION SHOWS RTU-2
 PROVIDING 403 CFMS OF OUTDOOR AIR, HOWEVER THE PLAN
 SHOWS THE UNIT IS PROVIDING 230 CFMS- SECTION 107.2.1
  
 3) M1: PLEASE CLARIFY HOW THE NEW RTU-3, WHICH HAS NO
 DUCTWORK, AND IS LOCATED IN THE BACK OF THE HOUSE, IS
 SUPPLYING AIR TO THE DINING ROOM- SECTION 107.2.1.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE
 LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY
 RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE INSERT
 CORRECTED PLAN SHEETS INTO THE SETS, REMOVE THE
 PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS AND MARK VOID ON THEM, AND
 KEEP THEM WITH THE SUBMITTALS.
  
 CHRISTOPHER L. COLE
 MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER
 401 CLEMATIS STREET
 WEST PALM BEACH FL 33401
 561-805-6719
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2018-01-10 Cont ID  
Sent By ccole Date 2018-01-10 Time 14:39 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ccole Date 2018-01-10 Time 11:52 Sent To  
Notes
2018-01-10 14:44:173RD REVIEW FBC-2014 MECHANICAL, ENERGY CONSERVATION
 CODES.
 PERMIT #17060359
 1/10/18
  
 PLAN REVIEW RESULTS: DENIED.
  
 1) SHEET M1: RECIRCULATION OF AIR FROM THE KITCHEN AC
 SYSTEM (RTU-1) INTO THE BAR AREA IS PROHIBITED PER
 TABLE 403.3 FOOTNOTE B.
  
 2) M1: THE REQUESTED EXHAUST VENTILATION CALULATION AND
 EXHAUST SYSTEM FOR THE KITCHEN WERE NOT PROVIDED.
  
 3) M1: THE PLAN SHOWS INADEQUATE AMOUNTS OF OUTDOOR AIR
 TO BE PROVIDED TO THE DINING ROOM AND BAR AREA. USING
 TABLE 403.3 I AM CALCULATING 1118 CFMS OF O/A REQUIRED
 FOR THE DINING ROOM AND BAR: 70 PERSONS PER 1000 SQ.
 FT.= 111 PERSONS FOR 1584 SQ. FT. X 7.5 CFMS PER SQ.
 FT= (833 CFMS) + 0.18 CFMS X 1584 SQ. FT.= (285 CFMS)-
 (TOTAL 1118 CFMS REQUIRED).
  
 4) M1: DS DETECTORS SHALL BE LOCATED IN THE RETURN AIR
 SYSTEMS OF THE AIR HANDLERS- SECTION 606.2.1. THE PLAN
 SHOWS THE DETECTORS IN THE SUPPLY DUCTS.
  
 5) M1: AUTOMATICALLY CONTROLLED SHUTOFF DAMPERS ARE
 REQUIRED FOR THE O/A DUCTS SUPPLYING THE AC SYSTEMS-
 SECTION C403.2.4.4 FBC-14 ENERGY CONSERVATION. THE PLAN
 IS INCORRECTLY SPECIFYING MANUAL DAMPERS- PLEASE
 CORRECT.
  
 6) M1: THE REQUESTED AIR BALANCE CALCULATIONS WERE NOT
 PROVIDED.
  
 7) M2: PLEASE PROVIDE THE BTUH CAPACITIES OF ALL THE
 GAS-FIRED COOKING APPLIANCES IN THE EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE,
 AND CIRCLE, HIGHLIGHT THE MODEL NUMBERS AND BTUH
 CAPACITIES ON THE PRODUCT SUBMITTALS. PLEASE NOTE THAT
 THE SUBMITTED COMBUSTION AIR CALCULATIONS APPEAR TO BE
 BASED ON 166,000 BTU'S WHICH IS AN INCORRECT, VERY LOW
 AMOUNT WHEN COMPARED WITH THE CAPACITIES
  
 LISTED ON THE SUBMITTALS, AND SHOWN IN THE ISOMETRIC
 DRAWING- PLEASE CORRECT.
  
 8) PROVIDE AC CALCULATIONS FOR THE NEW 5-TON RTU
 SYSTEM- SECTION C403.2.1 FBC-14 ENERGY CONSERVATION.
  
 9) M1, DETAIL M/6: REFER TO TABLE 1509.6.5 FBC-BUILDING
 AND PROVIDE THE CLEARANCE DISTANCE HEIGHT FROM THE
 FINISHED ROOF SURFACE TO THE BOTTOM SIDE OF THE RTU.
 PLEASE NOTE THAT THE RTU IS BEING IDENTIFIED AS
 A"CONDENSING " UNIT INSTEAD OF "PACKAGE" UNIT IN THE
 DETAIL. IT APPEARS THIS DETAIL DOES NOT ACTUALLY DEPICT
 WHAT TH3E ACTUAL INSTALLATION WILL BE BECAUSE NO
 DUCTWORK IS
  
 SHOWN CONNECTING TO THE UNIT.
  
 10) M1, DETAIL M/6: THE ATTACHMENT DETAIL IS
 INCOMPLETE. MISSING DETAILS INCLUDE: A) NUMBER OF
 ANCHORING STRAPS AND HOW THEY ARE ATTACHED TO THE BEAM.
 B) ATTACHMENT OF THE CABLES TO THE BEAM. C) ENGINEERING
 FOR THE STAND, AND ATTACHMENT OF THE STAND TO THE
 STRUCTURE. D) WIND DESIGN CRITERIA: WIND SPEED,
 EXPOSUIRE CATEGORY, IMPORTANCE FACTOR, HEIGHT ABOVE
 GRADE, ETC.
  
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE
 LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY
 RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE INSERT
 CORRECTED PLAN SHEETS INTO THE SETS, REMOVE THE
 PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS AND MARK VOID ON THEM, AND
 KEEP THEM WITH THE SUBMITTALS.
  
 CHRISTOPHER L. COLE
 MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER
 401 CLEMATIS STREET
 WEST PALM BEACH FL 33401
 561-805-6719
 [email protected]
  
  
  
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2017-09-07 Cont ID  
Sent By ccole Date 2017-09-07 Time 09:18 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ccole Date 2017-09-06 Time 17:21 Sent To  
Notes
2017-09-07 09:20:252ND REVIEW FBC-2014 MECHANICAL
 PERMIT #17060359
 9/7/17
  
 PLAN REVIEW RESULTS: DENIED.
  
 MANY OF THE 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS WERE NOT ADDRESSED AND
 STILL EXIST. I HAVE REPRINTED THOSE COMMENTS BELOW-
 PLEASE COMPLY.
  
 2) M1: KITCHEN EXHAUST AT A RATE OF .070 PER SF. IS
 REQUIRED PER TABLE 403.3, AND RECIRCULATION OF AIR FROM
 THAT SPACE IS PROHIBITED PER FOOTNOTE B. THE MECHANICAL
 PLAN IN ITS CURRENT DESIGN IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE AS IT
 CLEARLY SHOWS RTU-1 & 2 IS RECIRCULATING AIR FROM THE
 KITCHEN INTO THE DINING ROOM.
  
 3) M1: PROVIDE IN THE AC EQUIPMENT SCHEDULES THE AMOUNT
 OF O/A BEING SUPPLIED BY EACH UNIT.
  
 4) M1: A DUCT SMOKE DETECTOR IS REQUIRED IN THE RETURN
 AIR SYSTEM OF RTU-1 PER SECTION 606.2.1. THIS
 REQUIREMENT IS BASED ON THE FACT THAT A TYPICAL 5-TON
 SYSTEM CAN PRODUCE SUPPLY AIR IN EXCESS OF 2000 CFMS.
 PROVIDE A SYMBOL ON THE PLAN TO SHOW THE LOCATION OF
 THE DETECTOR AND INDICATE HOW IT WILL BE SUPERVISED PER
 SECTION 606.4.1.
  
 5) PROVIDE A COMPLETE KITCHEN EQUIPMENT PLAN THAT
 INDICATES MAKES AND MODELS OF ALL NEW AND EXISTING
 EQUIPMENT. SUBMIT SPEC SHEETS FOR ALL NEW EQUIPMENT
 INCLUDING THE NEW FRYER. PLEASE NOTE THAT INSTALLATION
 OF GAS-FIRE APPLIANCES WILL REQUIRE SUBMITTAL OF A GAS
 PIPING ISOMNETRIC DRAWING, COMBUSTION AIR CALULATIONS,
 AND SUBMITTALS OF SEPARATE PERMITS AND PLANS FOR A
 GREASE
  
 EXHAUST HOOD AND FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM.
  
 6) PROVIDE COMBUSTION AIR CALULATIONS.
  
 7) PROVIDE AN AIR BALANCE CALCULATION.
  
 8) INDICATE THE SIZES OF THE MAIN TRUNK LINES FROM THE
 RTU'S.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE
 LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY
 RE-SUBMITTAL FORM.
  
 ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE INSERT CORRECTED PAGES INTO THE
 SUBMITTAL AND LEAVE THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS.
  
 CHRISTOPHER L. COLE
 MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER
 401 CLEMATIS STREET
 WEST PALM BEACH FL 33401
 561-805-6719
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2017-06-15 Cont ID  
Sent By ccole Date 2017-06-15 Time 16:47 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ccole Date 2017-06-15 Time 16:36 Sent To  
Notes
2017-06-15 17:26:051ST REVIEW FBC-2014 MECHANICAL
 PERMIT #17060359
 6/15/17
  
 RESULTS: DENIED.
  
 1) SHEET M1: THE OUTSIDE AIR CALCULATIONS ARE INCORRECT
 AND NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH TABLE 403.3. O/A RATES FOR
 DINING ROOMS AND BARS ARE 7.5 CFM PER PERSON, PLUS 0.18
 CFMS PER SF. THIS CALCULATION WOULD RESULT IN
 APPROXIMATELY 1414 CFMS OF O/A REQUIRED FOR THE DINING
 ROOM AND BAR AREA. PLEASE NOTE THE 2433 SF. AREA SHOWN
 IN THE CALCULATION IS THE ENTIRE SPACE CALULATION THAT
 IS
  
 INCLUDING THE KITCHEN, STORAGE, AND UTILITY RIOOMS AND
 SPACES. THESE AREAS ARE CALCULATED DIFFERENTLY THEN THE
 DINING ROOM- SEE TABLE 403.3.
  
 2) M1: KITCHEN EXHAUST AT A RATE OF .070 PER SF. IS
 REQUIRED PER TABLE 403.3, AND RECIRCULATION OF AIR FROM
 THAT SPACE IS PROHIBITED PER FOOTNOTE B. THE MECHANICAL
 PLAN IN ITS CURRENT DESIGN IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE AS IT
 CLEARLY SHOWS RTU-1 & 2 IS RECIRCULATING AIR FROM THE
 KITCHEN INTO THE DINING ROOM.
  
 3) M1: PROVIDE IN THE AC EQUIPMENT SCHEDULES THE AMOUNT
 OF O/A BEING SUPPLIED BY EACH UNIT.
  
 4) M1: A DUCT SMOKE DETECTOR IS REQUIRED IN THE RETURN
 AIR SYSTEM OF RTU-1 PER SECTION 606.2.1. THIS
 REQUIREMENT IS BASED ON THE FACT THAT A TYPICAL 5-TON
 SYSTEM CAN PRODUCE SUPPLY AIR IN EXCESS OF 2000 CFMS.
 PROVIDE A SYMBOL ON THE PLAN TO SHOW THE LOCATION OF
 THE DETECTOR AND INDICATE HOW IT WILL BE SUPERVISED PER
 SECTION 606.4.1.
  
 5) PROVIDE A COMPLETE KITCHEN EQUIPMENT PLAN THAT
 INDICATES MAKES AND MODELS OF ALL NEW AND EXISTING
 EQUIPMENT. SUBMIT SPEC SHEETS FOR ALL NEW EQUIPMENT
 INCLUDING THE NEW FRYER. PLEASE NOTE THAT INSTALLATION
 OF GAS-FIRE APPLIANCES WILL REQUIRE SUBMITTAL OF A GAS
 PIPING ISOMNETRIC DRAWING, COMBUSTION AIR CALULATIONS,
 AND SUBMITTALS OF SEPARATE PERMITS AND PLANS FOR A
 GREASE
  
 EXHAUST HOOD AND FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM.
  
 6) PROVIDE COMBUSTION AIR CALULATIONS.
  
 7) PROVIDE AN AIR BALANCE CALCULATION.
  
 8) INDICATE THE SIZES OF THE MAIN TRUNK LINES FROM THE
 RTU'S.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE
 LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY
 RE-SUBMITTAL FORM.
  
 ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE INSERT CORRECTED PAGES INTO THE
 SUBMITTAL AND LEAVE THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS.
  
 CHRISTOPHER L. COLE
 MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER
 401 CLEMATIS STREET
 WEST PALM BEACH FL 33401
 561-805-6719
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 5 Status P Date 2018-04-30 Cont ID  
Sent By gjohnson Date 2018-04-30 Time 10:18 Rev Time 0.00
Received By gjohnson Date 2018-04-30 Time 10:18 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2018-03-17 Cont ID  
Sent By lcrespo Date 2018-03-17 Time 14:27 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lcrespo Date 2018-03-17 Time 12:52 Sent To  
Notes
2018-03-17 14:25:504TH REVIEW: FBC 2014 5TH EDITION
  
 DENIED
  
 1. PAGE A-4 BATHROOM LEGEND LIST GRAB BARS MISSING
 DIMENSIONS ON THE SIDE WALL VIEW. TO COMPLY WITH
 FBC-ACC 604.5.1 SIDE WALL. ALSO, SHOW THE TOILET PAPER
 HOLDER TO COMPLY WITH 2014 FBC-ACC 604.7 AND BE 7"-9"
 FROM THE LIP TO THE CENTER OF THE ROLL OR CENTER OF THE
 FIRST ROLL.
 2. THE VOIDED SET OF THE PLAN, P1 HAD AN ISOMETRIC
 DRAWING, NOTES, AND INFORMATION THAT IS NEEDED FOR THE
 FIELD, P-2 WAS ADDED AND THIS INFORMATION SHOULD HAVE
 BEEN TRANSPIRED TO REFLECT WORK. WPB AMENDMENTS TO THE
 FBC SEC. 107.2.1
 3. NEW GREASE TRAP INTERCEPTOR APPLICATION AND
 INSPECTION ARE REQUIRED WPB AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC SEC.
 105.1 REQUIRED. WPB ORDINANCE SEC. 90-125. -
 APPLICATION, CONSTRUCTION, AND CONNECTION TO CWPBSS.
  
 PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED
 MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. WHEN
 RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE
 LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY
 RESUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, INSERT CORRECTED PAGES
 INTO THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE OR VOID THE
 PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS.
  
 LUIS A. CRESPO
 PLUMBING INSPECTOR /
 PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW
 [email protected]
 561-805-6720
  
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2018-01-22 Cont ID  
Sent By gjohnson Date 2018-01-22 Time 10:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By gjohnson Date 2018-01-22 Time 08:18 Sent To  
Notes
2018-01-22 10:55:003RD REVIEW: FBC 2014 5TH EDITION
  
 PLUMBING COMMENTS:
  
 1. THE SANITARY ISOMETRIC ON P-1 SHOW THE SANITARY
 DISCHARGING INTO THE GREASE INTERCEPTOR THIS IS
 PROHIBITED ONLY DISCHARGE FROM FIXTURES PRODUCING
 GREASE LADEN WASTE SHALL DISCHARGE THROUGH GREASE
 INTERCEPTORS NO TOILETS. PER FBC PL 1003.2 AND 1003.3.1
  
 PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED
 MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS.
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE
 LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY
 RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. PLEASE, ADDITIONALLY, INSERT
 CORRECTED PAGES INTO TO SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE OR VOID
 THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS.
  
 GEORGE JOHNSON
 PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
  561-805-6711
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2017-09-07 Cont ID  
Sent By thunt Date 2017-09-07 Time 13:04 Rev Time 0.00
Received By thunt Date 2017-09-07 Time 10:24 Sent To  
Notes
2017-09-07 13:06:479/7/17 2ND REVIEW PLUMBING DENIED
  
 1.BASED ON THE OCCUPANCY LOAD OF 162 YOUR REQUIRED TO
 HAVE 2 TOILETS FOR EACH SEX TO COMPLY WITH FBC-PLB
 403.1 A-2 RESTAURANTS. I WOULD ADVISED YOU TO ASK FOR
 RELIEF FROM THE CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR OR LOWER YOUR
 OCCUPANCY
  
 2.PAGE A-4 BATHROOM LEGEND LIST GRAB BARS TO BE
 INSTALLED @ 33". TO COMPLY WITH FBC-ACC 609.4 GRAB BARS
 SHALL BE 33"-36" TO THE TOP OF THE GRIPPING SURFACE.
  
 3.PAGE A-4 BATHROOM LEGEND LIST THE TOILET PAPER
 DISPENSER TO BE INSTALLED @ 24" FROM THE HORIZONTAL
 LIP, THIS IS INCORRECT AND MUST COMPLY WITH FBC-ACC
 604.7 AND BE 7"-9" FROM THE LIP TO THE CENTER OF THE
 ROLL OR CENTER OF THE FIRST ROLL.
  
 4.PLAN SHOWS A DEEP FRYER BEING ADDED BUT IS NOT SHOWN
 ON THE ELECTRIC PLAN. IF DEEP FRYER IS GOING TO BE GAS
 UNIT A SEPARATE PERMIT AND DRAWINGS WILL BE REQUIRED.
  
 5.WITH THE GAS WATER HEATER NOW BEING IN A CLOSET
 PLEASE PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE WATER HEATER AND
 THE REQUIRED MAKE UP AIR FOR THE ROOM TO COMPLY WITH
 FBC-FUEL GAS SECTION 304. FBC 102.7.1
  
 6.PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS ON EXISTING GREASE TRAP AND
 SIZING BASED ON PLANNED OCCUPANCY LOAD
  
  
 TIM HUNT
 PLUMBING INSPECTOR / PLUMBING PLAN REVIEWER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 561-805-6695
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2017-06-13 Cont ID  
Sent By gjohnson Date 2017-06-13 Time 13:49 Rev Time 0.00
Received By gjohnson Date 2017-06-13 Time 13:49 Sent To  
Notes
2017-06-13 14:19:511ST REVIEW: FBC 2014 5TH EDITION
  
 PLUMBING COMMENTS:
  
 1. DUE TO THE ALTERATION OF THE LAYOUT OF THE BATHROOM
 IT NO LONGER MEETS ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS THE WIDTH
 OF THE BATHROOM OF 70" DOES NOT ALLOW FOR THE 60"
 CLEARANCE FOR THE TOILET THE LAVATORY CAN NOT ENCROACH
 ON THIS CLEAR FLOOR SPACE . PER FBC ACC 604.3.1 SIZE.
 CLEARANCE AROUND A WATER CLOSET SHALL BE 60 INCHES
 (1525 MM) MINIMUM MEASURED PERPENDICULAR FROM THE SIDE
 WALL AND 56 INCHES (1420 MM) MINIMUM MEASURED
 PERPENDICULAR FROM THE REAR WALL.
 604.3.2 OVERLAP.
 THE REQUIRED CLEARANCE AROUND THE WATER CLOSET SHALL BE
 PERMITTED TO OVERLAP THE WATER CLOSET, ASSOCIATED GRAB
 BARS, DISPENSERS, SANITARY NAPKIN DISPOSAL UNITS, COAT
 HOOKS, SHELVES, ACCESSIBLE ROUTES, CLEAR FLOOR SPACE
 AND CLEARANCES REQUIRED AT OTHER FIXTURES, AND THE
 TURNING SPACE. NO OTHER FIXTURES OR OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL
 BE LOCATED WITHIN THE REQUIRED WATER CLOSET CLEARANCE.
  
 2. AN ALTERATION THAT DECREASES OR HAS THE EFFECT OF
 DECREASING THE ACCESSIBILITY OF A BUILDING OR FACILITY
 BELOW THE REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION AT THE TIME
 OF THE ALTERATION IS PROHIBITED. PER FBC ACC 202.3.1
  
 3. PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC ACC 603-604-606 PER
 FBC ACC 213
  
 4. SHT P-1 APPEARS TO BE FROM A DIFFERENT PROJECT THE
 LAYOUT IS COMPLETELY DIFFERENT AND THE JOB NAME AND
 ADDRESS DO NOT MATCH THE REST OF THE PLAN PLEASE
 CLARIFY. PER WPB AMEND TO FBC 107.2.1
  
  
  
 PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED
 MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS.
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE
 LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY
 RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. PLEASE, ADDITIONALLY, INSERT
 CORRECTED PAGES INTO TO SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE OR VOID
 THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS.
  
 GEORGE JOHNSON
 PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
  561-805-6711
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop P-GREASE GREASE INTERCEPTOR/TRAP REVIEW
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2018-04-30 Cont ID  
Sent By gjohnson Date 2018-04-30 Time 10:18 Rev Time 0.00
Received By gjohnson Date 2018-04-30 Time 10:18 Sent To  
Notes
2018-04-30 10:20:32SEPARATE PERMIT AND PLANS REQUIRED WITH SIZING
 CALCULATIONS FOR NEW GREASE INTERCEPTOR.
  
 GEORGE JOHNSON
 PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
  561-805-6711
 [email protected]
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved