Plan Review Details - Permit 17060327
Plan Review Stops For Permit 17060327
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2017-08-10 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-08-10 Time 12:15 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-08-10 Time 12:15 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2017-08-09 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-08-09 Time 08:11 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-08-09 Time 08:08 Sent To  
Notes
2017-08-09 08:16:06****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014)
 FBC B = FBC BUILDING
 FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING
 FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY
 FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION
  
 1. THE FILES IN THE DRAWINGS FOLDER ARE OK.
  
 SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS FOLDER STILL HAS TWO DOCUMENTS
 UPLOADED 6/14/17. AS THIS IS DELEGATED ENGINEERING, THE
 SEOR IS REQUIRED BY FAC61G15 TO REVIEW THE DELEGATED
 ENGINEERING. THE DOCUMENTS THAT SEOR REVIEWED ARE NOT
 THE SAME AS THE (SOON TO BE) APPROVED PLAN. ALSO, IT IS
 NOT CLEAR IF THEY COMPLY WITH FBC, SO CANNOT BE
 STAMPED.
  
 PLEASE REPLACE THE TWO DOCUMENTS IN THE SUPPORTING DOCS
 FOLDER WITH DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE THE SAME AS THE
 DRAWINGS FOLDER, REVIEWED BY SEOR.
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2017-07-21 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-07-21 Time 07:21 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-07-20 Time 17:57 Sent To  
Notes
2017-07-21 07:34:01****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014)
 FBC B = FBC BUILDING
 FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING
 FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY
 FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION
  
 2ND REVIEW, NOT CLEAR HOW THE PREVIOUS LIST WAS
 ADDRESSED.
  
 IT IS NOT CLEAR WHICH DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE REVIEWED.
 THERE ARE TWO DOCUMENTS NAMED "SUB
 136-03-309-26.01-TRUSS LAYOUT", SUBMITTED ON TWO
 DIFFERENT DATES, SAME SIZE. IF ONE SHOULD SUPERSEDE THE
 OTHER, ONLY ONE SHOULD APPEAR. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH
 DIGITAL LIBRARIANS TO CORRECT SUBMITTAL.
  
 COMMENT FROM PREVIOUS LIST:
 *******************************
 FBC 603, CALCULATIONS FOR NON FRT TRUSSES WERE
 SUBMITTED. IT APPEARS THAT THE SPECIFICATION FOR
 NON-FRT WAS REDLINED BY SOMEONE FROM "NON FIRE
 RETARDANT LUMBER" TO REMOVE THE SPECIFICATION "NON".
  
 FBC 107, PROJECT IS TO COMPLY WITH BOTH FBC AND
 DESIGNER'S SPECIFICATIONS.
  
 ON THE PERMIT DOCUMENTS, IS FRT OR NON FRT SPECIFIED
 FOR 2ND FLOOR AWNING TRUSSES?
  
 IT APPEARS THAT ALTHOUGH NOT A "ROOF" OVER THE
 BUILDING, IT STILL SERVES AS A ROOF OVER EITHER BALCONY
 OR OTHER OUTDOOR AREAS. IT IS NOT CLEAR UNDER WHICH
 EXCEPTION THIS WOULD FALL; SEE FBC B 603.
  
 IF DESIGNER(S) FEEL THAT INSTALLATION OF NON FRT WOOD
 TRUSSES ON THE 2ND LEVEL ARE INCLUDED IN AN EXCEPTION,
 SUBMIT A LETTER EXPLAINING RATIONALE VIA EMAIL FOR
 PRELIMINARY REVIEW. OTHERWISE, REVISE CALCS TO INCLUDE
 FRT ONLY AND RESUBMIT.
 *************************
 2ND REVIEW, INFORMATION FROM DOR NOT RECEIVED. THIS
 ITEM FAILED IN THE FIRST PLAN REVIEW FOR THIS BUILDING.
 ARCHITECT'S RESPONSE AT THAT TIME WAS THAT ALL LUMBER
 PROPOSED WAS FRT. PERMIT WAS ISSUED BASED ON THIS
 STATEMENT. IF DOR WOULD LIKE TO PROPOSE NON FRT LUMBER
 FOR THIS TYPE 1 BUILDING, AND IT IS NOT SPECIFICALLY
 CALLED OUT ON THE PLAN, A REVISION IS REQUIRED.
  
 EMAIL FROM CONTRACTOR STATES THAT PLAN SPECIFIES NON
 FRT. PLEASE INDICATE WHERE. WHEN NON FRT IS PASSED IN
 PLAN REVIEW, I GENERALLY REQUIRE THAT THEY INCORPORATE
 THE APPLICABLE EXCEPTION INTO THE PLAN. IF PLAN WAS
 PASSED SPECIFYING NON FRT, PLEASE HAVE ARCHITECT SEND
 AN EMAIL INDICATING EXCEPTION TO FBC B CHAPTER 6
 REQUIREMENTS FOR NON COMBUSTIBLE BUILDINGS.
  
 2. SEE SHEET 11 OF THE TRUSS CALCS (TRUSSED VALLEY SET
 DETAIL), PLEASE UPDATE (INCORRECT DESIGN CRITERIA,
 WIND, ETC.)
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2017-06-24 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-06-24 Time 12:57 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-06-24 Time 12:57 Sent To  
Notes
2017-06-24 13:09:37****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014)
 FBC B = FBC BUILDING
 FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING
 FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY
 FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION
  
 FBC 603, CALCULATIONS FOR NON FRT TRUSSES WERE
 SUBMITTED. IT APPEARS THAT THE SPECIFICATION FOR
 NON-FRT WAS REDLINED BY SOMEONE FROM "NON FIRE
 RETARDANT LUMBER" TO REMOVE THE SPECIFICATION "NON".
  
 FBC 107, PROJECT IS TO COMPLY WITH BOTH FBC AND
 DESIGNER'S SPECIFICATIONS.
  
 ON THE PERMIT DOCUMENTS, IS FRT OR NON FRT SPECIFIED
 FOR 2ND FLOOR AWNING TRUSSES?
  
 IT APPEARS THAT ALTHOUGH NOT A "ROOF" OVER THE
 BUILDING, IT STILL SERVES AS A ROOF OVER EITHER BALCONY
 OR OTHER OUTDOOR AREAS. IT IS NOT CLEAR UNDER WHICH
 EXCEPTION THIS WOULD FALL; SEE FBC B 603.
  
 IF DESIGNER(S) FEEL THAT INSTALLATION OF NON FRT WOOD
 TRUSSES ON THE 2ND LEVEL ARE INCLUDED IN AN EXCEPTION,
 SUBMIT A LETTER EXPLAINING RATIONALE VIA EMAIL FOR
 PRELIMINARY REVIEW. OTHERWISE, REVISE CALCS TO INCLUDE
 FRT ONLY AND RESUBMIT.
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2017-08-10 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-08-10 Time 12:15 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-08-09 Time 16:46 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2017-08-09 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-08-09 Time 08:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-08-08 Time 13:03 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2017-07-21 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-07-21 Time 07:39 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-07-14 Time 11:44 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2017-06-24 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-06-24 Time 13:09 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-06-14 Time 10:01 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2017-08-09 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-08-09 Time 08:16 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-08-09 Time 08:16 Sent To  
Notes
2017-08-09 08:17:59THE SIGNED & SEALED DOCUMENTS IN THE "DRAWINGS" FOLDER
 ARE OK
 (NOTE - SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS ARE TO DEMONSTRATE DOR
 REVIEW ONLY, AND CANNOT BE S&S)
  
  
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2017-07-21 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-07-21 Time 07:37 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-07-21 Time 07:36 Sent To  
Notes
2017-07-21 07:39:25****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 THE DIGITALLY SIGNED AND SEALED DOCUMENTS ARE OK.
 HOWEVER, BUILDING ISSUE REGARDING USE OF NON FRT NEEDS
 TO BE ADDRESSED. IF NOT ADDRESSED, AND IT IS DETERMINED
 THAT FRT IS REQUIRED, NEW CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED.
  
  
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2017-06-24 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-06-24 Time 13:09 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-06-24 Time 13:09 Sent To  
Notes
2017-06-24 13:10:16SIGNATURES OK
 NEW DOCUMENTS TO BE REVIEWED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE
  
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved