Plan Review Details - Permit 17051100
Plan Review Stops For Permit 17051100
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2017-06-24 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-06-24 Time 12:18 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-06-24 Time 12:18 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2017-05-30 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-05-30 Time 16:22 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-05-30 Time 07:24 Sent To  
Notes
2017-05-30 16:22:32****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014)
 FBC B = FBC BUILDING
 FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING
 FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY
 FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION
  
 1. REVISE PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC B 713.14.1,
 708.1. IF AN EXCEPTION IS APPLICABLE, REVISE PLAN TO
 NOTE EXCEPTION. THE PLAN MAKES REFERENCE TO THE
 "ELEVATOR LOBBY" BUT NO FIRE RATINGS ARE SHOWN.
  
 2. SEPARATE PERMIT REQUIRED FOR ACCESS CONTROL; THIS
 WAS NOT REVIEWED AT THIS TIME AND WILL BE REVIEWED
 UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT APPLICATION, FBC 107.
  
 3. A601 DOOR SCHEDULE IS LABELED "SECOND FLOOR", REVISE
 OR CLARIFY. WORK APPEARS TO BE LOCATED ON ONE FLOOR,
 10TH ONLY, FBC 107.
  
 4. DBPR WEBSITE DOES NOT SHOW THAT ENGINEER (R.A.KAMM,
 PE) HAS COMPLETED THE ADVANCED FLORIDA BUILDING CODE
 COURSE REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE 471.0195 (REQUIRED
 TO BE COMPLETED BY JUNE 30, 2016). CONTACT FBPE TO HAVE
 THEM UPDATE THE WEBSITE. THIS COMMENT WILL NOT DELAY
 PERMIT ISSUANCE; PLEASE HAVE ENGINEER ACKNOWLEDGE THAT
 COURSE HAS BEEN TAKEN AND FBPE INFORMED.
  
 5. G101 REFERS TO "CHIEF MEIZISO" AS AHJ; REVISE.
  
 6. REVISE PLAN TO INCLUDE COMPLIANCE METHOD ELECTED;
 FBC EB 301.1.
  
  
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2017-06-01 Cont ID  
Sent By jpearson Date 2017-06-01 Time 10:43 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jpearson Date 2017-06-01 Time 10:43 Sent To  
Notes
2017-06-01 10:44:49APPROVED WITH EXCEPTION: NEED ELECTRICAL PERMIT
 APPLICATION. FBC 105.1
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2017-06-16 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 2017-06-16 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 2017-06-16 Time 09:59 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2017-05-31 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 2017-05-31 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 2017-05-31 Time 10:23 Sent To  
Notes
2017-05-31 13:52:30THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE
 MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
  
 1) SHEET G 101 - IN SECTION D6 IT INDICATES, COMMON
 PATH OF TRAVEL CODE REFERENCE NFPA 101 12.2.5.1.2. THAT
 REFERENCE IS RELALATED TO ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCIES. THE
 PROPOSED APPEARS TO BE A BUSINESS OCCUPANCY.
  
 PLEASE CORRECT OR CLARIFY.
  
  
  
 2) SHEET G 101 - IN SECTION D6 IT INDICATES, # OF
 EXITS, CODE REFERENCE NFPA 101 12.2.4.1. THAT REFERENCE
 IS RELALATED TO ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCIES. THE PROPOSED
 APPEARS TO BE A BUSINESS OCCUPANCY.
  
 PLEASE CORRECT OR CLARIFY.
  
  
  
 3) SHEET G 101 - IN SECTION D6 IT INDICATES, FE, CODE
 REFERENCE NFPA 1 13.6.6.2. THAT REFERENCE IS "ANY FIRE
 EXTINGUISHER THAT CAN NO LONGER BE SERVICED IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER?S MAINTENANCE MANUAL
 IS
 CONSIDERED OBSOLETE AND SHALL BE REMOVED FROM SERVICE".
  
 I DO NOT BELIEVE IT APPLIES.
  
 PLEASE CORRECT OR CLARIFY.
  
  
  
 4) SHEET G 101 - IN SECTION D6 IT INDICATES A REFERENCE
 TO CHIEF MEIZISO. THIS REFERENCE HAS NO RELATION TO
 ANYONE AT WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE AND IS NOT
 APPLICABLE NOR APPROVED.
  
 PLEASE REVIEW AND REMOVE OR PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION OR
 DETAILS OF ALTERNATIVE MEANS AND METHODS.
  
  
  
 5) SHEET G 101 - IT INDICATES FIRE CODE REFERENCES TO
 NFPA 101, 7.2.1.6.3 BUT LEAVES OUT # (14)*THE
 PROVISIONS OF 7.2.1.6.2 FOR ACCESS-CONTROLLED EGRESS
 DOOR ASSEMBLIES ARE NOT APPLIED TO THE ELEVATOR LOBBY
 DOOR ASSEMBLIES.
  
  
 THE APPENDIX STATES:
  
 A.7.2.1.6.3(14) IT IS NOT THE INTENT TO PROHIBIT
 ELEVATOR LOBBY DOORS FROM BEING EQUIPPED WITH CARD
 ACCESS SYSTEMS FOR GAINING ACCESS, FOR EXAMPLE, TO
 TENANT SPACES. IT IS THE ACCESS CONTROLLED EGRESS DOOR
 SYSTEM DESCRIBED IN 7.2.1.6.2 THAT IS PROHIBITED FROM
 BEING INSTALLED ON THE SAME DOOR AS THE LOCK ADDRESSED
 BY 7.2.1.6.3.
  
 NFPA 101, CHAPTER 7, MEANS OF EGRESS STATES:
  
 7.4.1.6 ELEVATOR LANDING AND LOBBY EXIT ACCESS.
 7.4.1.6.1 EACH ELEVATOR LANDING AND LOBBY SHALL HAVE
 ACCESS TO AT LEAST ONE EXIT.
 7.4.1.6.2 THE ELEVATOR LANDING AND LOBBY EXIT ACCESS
 REQUIRED BY
 7.4.1.6.1 SHALL NOT REQUIRE THE USE OF A KEY, A TOOL,
 SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE, OR SPECIAL EFFORT, UNLESS PERMITTED
 BY 7.4.1.6.3.
 7.4.1.6.3 DOORS SEPARATING THE ELEVATOR LOBBY FROM THE
 EXIT ACCESS REQUIRED BY 7.4.1.6.1 SHALL BE PERMITTED TO
 BE ELECTRONICALLY LOCKED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 7.2.1.6.3.
  
 BASED ON THE ABOVE AND THE PROPOSED EXIT CONFIGURATION
 THE ACCESS CONTROL ON THE DOOR LEADING TO THE
 ACCESSIBLE EXIT DOOR OF THE LOBBY CAN NOT BE ACCESS
 CONTROLLED.
  
 PLEASE CORRECT.
  
  
  
 6) PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAILED REVIEW OF THE BUILDINGS
 SMOKE CONTROL/ELEVATOR PRESSURAZATION SYSTEM TO ENSURE
 THAT THIS LOBBY CONFIGURATION MEETS THE INITIAL AND/OR
 CURRENT BUILDING DESIGN REQUIRERMENTS.
  
 IS THE ELEVATOR PRESSURIZED AND/OR IS THE ELEVATOR
 LOBBY REQUIRED TO BE PRESSURIZED?
  
 ARE THE LOBBY DOORS REQUIRED TO BE SMOKE PROOF/SMOKE
 BARRIER?
  
  
  
 7) SHEET G 101 - IN SECTION D6 # 11, THERE IS AN
 INDICATION (NO LATCH PROVIDED ON LOBBY DOORS). ON SHEET
 A 601, DOOR SCHEDULE, THERE IS AN INDICATION ON DOOR #
 100A, HARDWARE SET # 1, IT INDICATES "DOUBLE SECURE
 GLASS DOORS".
  
 PLEASE CLARIFY AND PROVIDE DETAILS AS TO HOW THIS MEETS
 THE FIRE CODE # 11.
  
  
  
 8) THERE IS NO REFERENCE FOUND INDICATING THE
 MAINTENANCE OR REVISION OF THE FIRE SPRINKLER.
  
 ANY REMOVAL AND/OR CONSTRUCTION OF WALLS AND /OR
 CEILINGS REQUIRE AN EVALUATION OF THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM
 FOR CODE COVERAGE AND COMPLIANCE BY CERTIFIED LIFE
 SAFETY CONTRACTORS.
  
 ANY AND ALL WORK ON THE FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM SHALL BE
 DONE UNDER SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS AND BY CERTIFIED LIFE
 SAFETY CONTRACTORS.
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE AN APPLICABLE NOTE.
  
  
  
 9) THE LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS, FIRE ALARM AND/OR FIRE
 SPRINKLER SHALL REMAIN ACTIVE THROUGHOUT THE
 CONSTRUCTION PERIOD.
  
 ANY TIME THAT WORK ON THE LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS,
 SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM, EXCEEDS 4 HOURS, A FIRE
 WATCH SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL FULL
 AND COMPLETE PROTECTION IS RETURNED.
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE AN APPLICABLE NOTE.
  
  
  
 10) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET
 REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE
 ABOVE.
  
  
  
 11) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE
 RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE.
  
  
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
  
  
  
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2017-06-24 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-06-24 Time 12:18 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-06-12 Time 09:27 Sent To  
Notes
2017-06-13 14:17:58B22
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2017-06-01 Cont ID  
Sent By jpearson Date 2017-06-01 Time 10:43 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jpearson Date 2017-05-24 Time 13:54 Sent To  
Notes
2017-05-25 13:54:07B17
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2017-06-16 Cont ID  
Sent By ccole Date 2017-06-16 Time 17:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ccole Date 2017-06-16 Time 16:41 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2017-05-31 Cont ID  
Sent By ccole Date 2017-05-31 Time 16:35 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ccole Date 2017-05-31 Time 16:35 Sent To  
Notes
2017-05-31 16:54:011ST REVIEW FBC-2014 MECHANICAL
 PERMIT #17051100
 5/31/17
  
 RESULTS: DENIED.
  
 1) M2.1: PLEASE REVIEW BUILDING AND FIRE REVIEW
 COMMENTS CONCERNING THE ELEVATOR LOBBY, PENDING
 RESPONSES FROM THE DESIGN PROFESSIONALS AND POSSIBLE
 PLAN REVISIONS THE DUCTS PENETRATING THE LOBBY WALLS
 MAY REQUIRE FIRE/SMOKE DAMPERS.
  
 2) M2.1 & M6.1: HP-4 HAS A CAPACITY OF 1129 SUPPLY
 CFMS, HOWEVER THE MECHANICAL PLAN INDICATES THE UNIT
 MUST SUPPLY 1350 CFMS.
  
 3) M2.1: THERE IS AN 8X8 BRANCH DUCT CONNECTED TO THE
 MAIN TRUNK OF HP-5 WITH NO DIFFUSER.
  
 4) M2.1 & M6.1: HP=5 & HP-6A APPEAR TO BE OVERSIZED IN
 CAPACITY BASED ON THE SCHEDULE AND SUPPLY CFM
 DISTRIBUTION IN THE MECHANICAL PLAN- PLEASE CLARIFY.
  
 CHRISTOPHER L. COLE
 MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER
 401 CLEMATIS STREET
 WEST PALM BEACH FL 33401
 561-805-6719
 [email protected]
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved