Plan Review Details - Permit 17050878
Plan Review Stops For Permit 17050878
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2017-11-08 Cont ID  
Sent By cthroop Date 2017-11-08 Time 09:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cthroop Date 2017-11-08 Time 09:42 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2017-09-13 Cont ID  
Sent By cthroop Date 2017-09-13 Time 17:16 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cthroop Date 2017-09-13 Time 16:39 Sent To E
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2017-08-23 Cont ID  
Sent By cthroop Date 2017-08-23 Time 10:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cthroop Date 2017-08-23 Time 10:01 Sent To  
Notes
2017-08-23 10:29:43BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
 2014 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W/2010 WEST PALM BEACH
 AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1
 ADMINISTRATION
  
 CHRISTOPHER S. THROOP, C.B.O.
 PLANS EXAMINER, PX3169
 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DIVISION
 TEL: 561-805-6726
 FAX: 561-805-6676
  
 1ST REVIEW
 RESULTS: DENIED
 ADDRESS THE ATTACHED COMMENTS AND RE-SUBMIT
  
 1. DESIGN WIND LOADS AND FOUNDATION COMMENTS HAVE BEEN
 ADDRESSED.
 2. THERE APPEARS TO BE AN OPEN ISSUE WITH LOCATION OF
 SOME POLES ON THE SITE PLAN.
 2. ADDRESS ZONING AND ELECTRICAL COMMENTS AND
 RE-SUBMIT.
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2017-06-02 Cont ID  
Sent By cthroop Date 2017-06-02 Time 15:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cthroop Date 2017-06-02 Time 15:25 Sent To  
Notes
2017-06-02 15:36:31BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
 2014 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W/2010 WEST PALM BEACH
 AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1
 ADMINISTRATION
  
 CHRISTOPHER S. THROOP, C.B.O.
 PLANS EXAMINER, PX3169
 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DIVISION
 TEL: 561-805-6726
 FAX: 561-805-6676
  
 1ST REVIEW
 RESULTS: DENIED
 ADDRESS THE ATTACHED COMMENTS AND RE-SUBMIT
  
 YOUR SUBMITTAL IS DEFICIENT FOR THE REASONS LISTED
 BELOW.
 DUE TO THE DEFICIENCIES OF THIS PLAN, A COMPLETE AND
 THOROUGH REVIEW CANNOT BE PERFORMED AT THIS TIME. UPON
 RE-SUBMITTAL, ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE MADE.
  
 1. PROVIDE SITE PLAN INDICATING LOCATION OF EACH
 POLE/FIXTURE.
 2. PROVIDE DESIGN WIND LOADS FOR EACH TYPE OF
 POLE/LIGHT FIXTURE.
 3. ALL SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS SHALL BE IN DUPLICATE.
 4. 4X FEE WILL BE ASSESSED FOR WORK PERFORMED WITHOUT
 PERMIT.
 5. ADDRESS ZONING AND ELECTRICAL COMMENTS AND
 RE-SUBMIT.
  
 FBC 107.2.1 INFORMATION ON CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS.
 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE DIMENSIONED AND DRAWN
 UPON SUITABLE MATERIAL. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 OF SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE
 AND EXTENT OF THE WORK PROPOSED AND SHOW IN DETAIL THAT
 IT WILL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE AND
 RELEVANT LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS, AS
 DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL.
  
 FBC 107.3.5.1.1(8) - PROVIDE WIND DESIGN LOADS/DESIGN
 PRESSURES PURSUANT TO FBC-CHAPTER 16
  
 1603.1.4 WIND DESIGN DATA.
 THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION RELATED TO WIND LOADS SHALL
 BE SHOWN, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER WIND LOADS GOVERN THE
 DESIGN OF THE LATERAL FORCE-RESISTING SYSTEM OF THE
 STRUCTURE:
 1. ULTIMATE DESIGN WIND SPEED, VULT, (3-SECOND GUST),
 MILES PER HOUR (KM/HR) AND NOMINAL DESIGN WIND SPEED,
 VASD, AS DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION
 1609.3.1.
 2. RISK CATEGORY.
 3. WIND EXPOSURE. APPLICABLE WIND DIRECTION IF MORE
 THAN ONE WIND EXPOSURE IS UTILIZED.
 4. APPLICABLE INTERNAL PRESSURE COEFFICIENT.
 5. DESIGN WIND PRESSURES TO BE USED FOR EXTERIOR
 COMPONENT AND CLADDING MATERIALS NOT SPECIFICALLY
 DESIGNED BY THE REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN OF THE STRUCTURE, PSF (KN/
 M2).
  
 FBC107.1 GENERAL. SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS CONSISTING OF
 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, STATEMENT OF SPECIAL
 INSPECTIONS, GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND OTHER DATA SHALL
 BE SUBMITTED IN TWO OR MORE SETS WITH EACH PERMIT
 APPLICATION.
 THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE PREPARED BY A
 REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL WHERE REQUIRED BY
 CHAPTER 471, FLORIDA STATUTES& 61G15 FLORIDA
 ADMINISTRATIVE CODE OR CHAPTER 481, FLORIDA STATUTES&
 61G1 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE
 LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY
 RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. PLEASE, ADDITIONALLY, INSERT
 CORRECTED PAGES INTO SUBMITTAL AND LEAVE THE PREVIOUSLY
 REVIEWED SHEETS DETACHED AND MARK VOID.
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2017-11-08 Cont ID  
Sent By jleahy Date 2017-11-08 Time 06:54 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jleahy Date 2017-11-08 Time 06:54 Sent To B
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2017-09-14 Cont ID  
Sent By jleahy Date 2017-09-14 Time 10:56 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jleahy Date 2017-09-14 Time 10:56 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2017-08-21 Cont ID  
Sent By jleahy Date 2017-08-21 Time 18:14 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jleahy Date 2017-08-21 Time 18:13 Sent To B
Notes
2017-08-21 18:15:31PLEASE SEE THE ORIGINAL COMMENTS FOR CONTROL OF
 LIGHTING AND SHOW IT ON PLANS FOR REVIEW.
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2017-06-02 Cont ID  
Sent By jleahy Date 2017-06-02 Time 11:02 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jleahy Date 2017-06-02 Time 11:02 Sent To B
Notes
2017-06-02 11:05:49FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2014 5TH EDITION
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ENERGY CONSERVATION 2014 5TH
 EDITION
 NFPA 70 2011 EDITION
  
 JAKE LEAHY
 ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER II
 561-805-6713
 [email protected]
  
  
 ONLY ONE SET OF SPECS AND DRAWING HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED.
 AT LEAST TWO SETS ARE REQUIRED.
  
 C405.2.4 EXTERIOR LIGHTING CONTROLS.
 LIGHTING NOT DESIGNATED FOR DUSK-TO-DAWN OPERATION
 SHALL BE CONTROLLED BY EITHER A COMBINATION OF A
 PHOTOSENSOR AND A TIME SWITCH, OR AN ASTRONOMICAL TIME
 SWITCH. LIGHTING DESIGNATED FOR DUSK-TO-DAWN
 OPERATION SHALL BE CONTROLLED BY AN ASTRONOMICAL TIME
 SWITCH OR PHOTOSENSOR. ALL TIME SWITCHES SHALL BE
 CAPABLE OF RETAINING PROGRAMMING AND THE TIME SETTING
 DURING LOSS OF POWER FOR A PERIOD OF AT LEAST 10
 HOURS.
  
 FBC 107.3.5.1.1(8) - PROVIDE WIND DESIGN LOADS/DESIGN
 PRESSURES PURSUANT TO FBC-CHAPTER 16
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2017-11-08 Cont ID  
Sent By cthroop Date 2017-11-08 Time 09:43 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cthroop Date 2017-10-16 Time 15:43 Sent To I
Notes
2017-10-17 15:43:35RESUB ROUTED TO ESCHNEIDER VIA ZONING INBOX
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2017-09-14 Cont ID  
Sent By jleahy Date 2017-09-14 Time 10:57 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jleahy Date 2017-08-29 Time 13:20 Sent To  
Notes
2017-08-30 13:20:42RESUB ROUTED TO ESCHNEIDER VIA ZONING INBOX
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2017-08-23 Cont ID  
Sent By cthroop Date 2017-08-23 Time 10:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cthroop Date 2017-08-02 Time 14:05 Sent To  
Notes
2017-08-03 14:05:32RESUB ROUTED TO ESCHNEIDER VIA ZONING INBOX
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2017-06-02 Cont ID  
Sent By cthroop Date 2017-06-02 Time 15:25 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cthroop Date 2017-05-18 Time 13:25 Sent To  
Notes
2017-05-19 13:25:39ROUTED TO ZONING
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2017-11-02 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2017-11-02 Time 15:31 Rev Time 0.50
Received By eschneid Date 2017-11-02 Time 14:54 Sent To E
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2017-09-07 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2017-09-07 Time 12:45 Rev Time 0.50
Received By eschneid Date 2017-09-07 Time 12:45 Sent To E
Notes
2017-09-07 12:45:57FAILED
  
 PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS.
  
 1) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE INFORMATION/DRAWINGS THAT
 THE NORTHERNMOST LIGHT POLE BEING SHOWN AS RELOCATED IN
 DETAIL 2 ON SHEET E2.02 WILL NOT CONFLICT WITH THE
 EXISTING COCONUT PALMS LOCATED IN THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND.
 THE POLE NEEDS TO BE AT LEAST FIVE (5) FEET FROM THE
 CLOSEST POINT OF THE TREE.
  
 2) REVISED REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN
 TO VERIFY THAT THERE IS NO GLARE BEING CAST ONTO THE
 ADJACENT PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY. NO PHOTOMETRICS (OTHER
 THAN A SMALL SECTION ALONG PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD
 TO ADDRESS A PREVIOUS COMMENT) WERE PROVIDED THAT
 VERIFY THAT THE LIGHTING LEVELS AT THE PROPERTY LINES
 ADJACENT TO THE RIGHTS-OF-WAY DO NOT EXCEED 1
 FOOTCANDLE AND THAT GLARE WILL NOT BE CAST INTO THE
 RIGHTS-OF-WAY.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  
2017-08-30 15:47:02ROUTED TO ERIC SCHNEIDER
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2017-08-18 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2017-08-18 Time 10:43 Rev Time 1.00
Received By eschneid Date 2017-08-18 Time 10:43 Sent To E
Notes
2017-08-18 10:43:57FAILED
  
 PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS.
  
 1) PROVIDE THE SETBACK DIMENSION FOR THE NEW LIGHT POLE
 SHOWN IN DETAIL 2 ON SHEET E2.01. PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS
 POLE IS REQUIRED TO BE A MINIMUM OF 25 FEET FROM NORTH
 FLAGLER DRIVE.
  
 2) PROVIDE INFORMATION/DRAWINGS THAT THE NORTHERNMOST
 LIGHT POLE BEING SHOWN AS RELOCATED IN DETAIL 2 ON
 SHEET E2.02 WILL NOT CONFLICT WITH THE EXISTING COCONUT
 PALMS LOCATED IN THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND. THE POLE NEEDS
 TO BE AT LEAST FIVE (5) FEET FROM THE CLOSEST POINT OF
 THE TREE.
  
 3) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN TO VERIFY
 THAT THERE IS NO GLARE BEING CAST ONTO THE ADJACENT
 RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES OR THE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY. THE
 CITY STANDARD IS THAT ILLUMINATION LEVELS SHALL NOT
 EXCEED ONE FOOT CANDLE AT THE PROPERTY BOUNDARY AND
 THAT GLARE DOES NOT EXCEED 0.5 FOOT CANDLES IN A
 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. *** SHEET E3.01 SHOWS
 ILLUMINATION LEVELS AS HIGH AS 1 FOOTCANDLE ALONG THE
 WEST PROPERTY LINE, WHICH IS PERMITTED; HOWEVER, IT
 DOES NOT VERIFY THAT THE GLARE IS ONLY 0.5 FOOTCANDLES
 ON THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY IMMEDIATELY WEST OF THE
 PROPERTY LINE. NO PHOTOMETRICS WERE PROVIDED THAT
 VERIFY THAT THE LIGHTING LEVELS AT THE PROPERTY LINES
 ADJACENT TO THE RIGHTS-OF-WAY DO NOT EXCEED 1
 FOOTCANDLE AND THAT GLARE WILL NOT BE CAST INTO THE
 RIGHTS-OF-WAY THEMSELVES.
  
 4) STAFF HAS CONCERNS WITH THE POTENTIAL GLARE CREATED
 BY FIXTURE TYPES B AND D DUE TO THE EXPOSED LIGHT
 SOURCE AND THE SIDE LIGHT CASTING. THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN
 WILL VERIFY IF THESE ARE ACCEPTABLE.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  
2017-08-04 16:38:13ROUTED TO ERIC SCHNEIDER
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2017-06-01 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2017-06-01 Time 16:33 Rev Time 1.00
Received By eschneid Date 2017-06-01 Time 16:33 Sent To E
Notes
2017-06-01 16:34:15FAILED
  
 PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS.
  
 1) PROVIDE TWO COPIES OF A RECENT SURVEY SHOWING THE
 EXISTING LIGHT POLE LOCATIONS. TWO OF THE THREE SHEETS
 THAT YOU PROVIDED ARE FROM THE EARLY 90'S AND ARE
 OBSOLETE. YOU NEED TO BASE YOUR SITE PLAN ON EXISTING
 CONDITIONS. PLEASE NOTE: YOU CAN'T REPLACE WHAT DOES
 NOT EXIST.
  
 2) PROVIDE TWO COPIES OF THE SITE PLANS. PLEASE NOTE
 THAT SHEET E1.1 IS NOT AN ACCURATE BASE SITE PLAN FOR
 EXISTING CONDITIONS (THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SITE
 NOW CONTAINS THREE PARKING SPACES WHERE ONE LIGHT POLE
 IS SHOWN) BUT IT DIFFERS FROM THE RECENTLY APPROVED
 SITE PLAN THAT YOU INCLUDED AS SHEET 1 OF 5).
  
 3) PROVIDE A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN TO VERIFY THAT THERE IS
 NO GLARE BEING CAST ONTO THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL
 PROPERTIES OR THE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY. THE CITY
 STANDARD IS THAT ILLUMINATION LEVELS SHALL NOT EXCEED
 ONE FOOT CANDLE AT THE PROPERTY BOUNDARY AND THAT GLARE
 DOES NOT EXCEED 0.5 FOOT CANDLES IN A RESIDENTIAL
 DISTRICT.
  
 4) THE PLAN SHOWS THE REPLACEMENT OF FOUR POLES (TYPE
 1) ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE PARKING
 GARAGE. CURRENTLY, TWO OF THE POLES HAVE BEEN REMOVED
 (ONLY THE BASE STILL REMAINS). PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY THEY
 WERE REMOVED.
  
 5) THE PLAN SHOWS THE REPLACEMENT OF NINE POLES (TYPE
 3) ALONG PALM BEACH LAKES AND THE PARKING LOT TO THE
 WEST OF THE BUILDING. CURRENTLY, THE TWO WESTERN POLES
 ALONG PALM BEACH LAKES HAVE BEEN REMOVED. PLEASE
 EXPLAIN WHY THEY WERE REMOVED. AS MENTIONED IN COMMENT
 NO. 1, THERE NO LONGER IS A POLE WHERE THE PARKING
 SPACES NOW EXIST. ADDITIONALLY, THE NORTHERNMOST POLE
 IS IN A LOCATION WHERE A NEW PARKING SPACE IS PLANNED.
 IT SEEMS COUNTER INTUITIVE TO REPLACE THIS POLE IN A
 LOCATION WHERE IT IS SLATED TO BE REMOVED.
  
 6) THE NARRATIVE STATES 12 BOLLARDS WILL BE REPLACED.
 THE PLANS SHOW EIGHT BOLLARDS. HOWEVER, THE EXISTING
 SITE ONLY CONTAINS SIX BOLLARDS.
  
 7) THE NARRATIVE STATES THAT THERE ARE 10 WALL PACKS
 (TYPE 5) BEING REPLACED. THE PLANS SHOW SIX TYPE 5
 LIGHTS; HOWEVER, THESE LIGHTS ARE SHOWN IN A SODDED
 LANDSCAPE AREA WHERE NO LIGHTS EXIST OR A WALL TO MOUNT
 THEM ON. PLEASE REVIEW YOUR PLANS.
  
 8) PROVIDE THE OVERALL HEIGHT OF LIGHT TYPE 6 FROM
 GRADE.
  
 9) MANY OF THE TYPE 7 POLES ARE NOT IN THE LOCATIONS
 APPROVED ON THE LATEST SITE PLAN. YOU HAVE SHOWN THEM
 IN DIFFERENT LOCATIONS ON YOUR MARKUP, WHICH PUTS THEM
 INTO DIRECT CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED TREES. THE POLES
 MUST GO IN THE APPROVED LOCATIONS.
  
 10) PROVIDE THE OVERALL HEIGHT OF LIGHT TYPE 7 FROM
 GRADE.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  
2017-05-19 17:04:41ROUTED TO ERIC SCHNEIDER


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved