| Plan Review Stops For Permit 17050508 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2017-07-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2017-07-21 |
Time |
07:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2017-07-21 |
Time |
06:54 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2017-06-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2017-06-20 |
Time |
15:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2017-06-20 |
Time |
13:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-06-20 15:39:34 | PLAN | | | REVIEW COMMENTS | | | | | | 3RD REVIEW: FBC FIFTH EDITION (2014) | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561) 805-6714 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | DENIED BY BUILDING - COMMENT NUMBER 1 FROM THE FIRST | | | TWO REVIEWS WAS NOT ADDRESSED. | | | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEM NOTED BELOW: | | | | | | 1) THE GENERATOR PAD WINDLOAD ANCHORING DETAILS FROM | | | RONALD H. WILSON A FLORIDA LICENSED ENGINEER ARE | | | REQUIRED TO HAVE HIS ORIGINAL HANDWRITTEN SIGNATURE IN | | | ADDITION TO HIS SEAL AND THE DATE. COPIES OR OTHER | | | FACSIMILES ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. FAC 61G15-23.002 | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2017-06-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2017-06-05 |
Time |
07:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2017-06-05 |
Time |
07:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-06-05 07:47:28 | PLAN | | | REVIEW COMMENTS | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW: FBC FIFTH EDITION (2014) | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561) 805-6714 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | DENIED BY BUILDING - COMMENTS FROM THE FIRST REVIEW | | | WERE NOT ADDRESSED | | | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: | | | | | | 1) THE GENERATOR PAD WINDLOAD ANCHORING DETAILS FROM | | | RONALD H. WILSON A FLORIDA LICENSED ENGINEER ARE | | | REQUIRED TO HAVE HIS ORIGINAL HANDWRITTEN SIGNATURE IN | | | ADDITION TO HIS SEAL AND THE DATE. COPIES OR OTHER | | | FACSIMILES ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. FAC 61G15-23.002 | | | | | | 2) A MINIMUM OF TWO IDENTICAL SETS OF PLAN DOCUMENTS | | | ARE REQUIRED. SEE GAS REVIEW COMMENTS. FBC 107.1 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2017-05-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2017-05-26 |
Time |
18:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2017-05-26 |
Time |
17:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-05-26 17:55:29 | PLAN | | | REVIEW COMMENTS | | | | | | 1ST REVIEW: FBC FIFTH EDITION (2014) | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561) 805-6714 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | DENIED BY BUILDING | | | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: | | | | | | 1) THE GENERATOR PAD WINDLOAD ANCHORING DETAILS FROM | | | RONALD H. WILSON A FLORIDA LICENSED ENGINEER ARE | | | REQUIRED TO HAVE HIS ORIGINAL HANDWRITTEN SIGNATURE IN | | | ADDITION TO HIS SEAL AND THE DATE. COPIES OR OTHER | | | FACSIMILES ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. FAC 61G15-23.002 | | | | | | 2) A MINIMUM OF TWO IDENTICAL SETS OF PLAN DOCUMENTS | | | ARE REQUIRED. SEE GAS REVIEW COMMENTS. FBC 107.1 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2017-07-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleahy |
Date |
2017-07-21 |
Time |
15:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleahy |
Date |
2017-07-21 |
Time |
15:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2017-06-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleahy |
Date |
2017-06-16 |
Time |
12:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleahy |
Date |
2017-06-16 |
Time |
17:03 |
Sent To |
G |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2017-05-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleahy |
Date |
2017-05-24 |
Time |
07:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleahy |
Date |
2017-05-24 |
Time |
07:56 |
Sent To |
G |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2017-08-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2017-08-11 |
Time |
10:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2017-08-11 |
Time |
09:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2017-07-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2017-07-20 |
Time |
09:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2017-07-20 |
Time |
08:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-07-20 09:05:39 | 1) CITY RECORDS SHOW AN EXISTING GAS SYSTEM WITH AN | | | EXISTING BTU LOAD OF 540,000 BTU'S. THE ADDED 281,000 | | | BTU'S BRINGS THE TOTAL TO 821,000 BTU'S. THE GALVANIZED | | | SUPPLY LINE FROM THE METER SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 2 | | | INCHES FOR A LESS THAN 2 PSI SYSTEM PER TABLE 402.4 (2) | | | . THE PLANS ON RECORD SHOWS THIS SUPPLY AS 1 1/2 | | | INCHES. | | | 2) ONE OF THE PE TABLES REFERENCED ON THE DRAWING | | | (TABLE 402.4 (24) IS FOR PE TUBING WITH A MAX SIZE OF | | | 3/4 INCH. THIS TABLE IS NOT APPLICABLE. | | | 3) THE PLANS INDICATE AN EXISTING GAS METER. THE BTU | | | LOAD OF THE EXISTING GAS SYSTEM MUST BE ADDED INTO THE | | | TOTAL BTU LOAD ON THE SYSTEM TO ENSURE THE EXISTING | | | SYSTEM IS PROPERLY SIZED. IF UNDERSIZED, THE EXISTING | | | SYSTEM MUST BE REDONE TO ENSURE A SAFE OPERATING | | | SYSTEM. SUBMIT A GAS PIPING RISER DIAGRAM THAT SHOWS | | | THE TYPE OF EXISTING APPLIANCE, THE BTU LOAD OF EACH | | | APPLIANCE, THE PIPE SIZE AND TYPE OF PIPE TO EACH | | | APPLIANCE, AND THE DISTANCE OF THE LONGEST LENGTH OF | | | PIPING FROM THE POINT OF DELIVERY TO THE MOST REMOTE | | | OUTLET AND THE LOAD OF THE SECTION. NOTE: IF THE | | | EXISTING SYSTEM IS LESS THAN A 2 PSI SYSTEM AND THE | | | SYSTEM PRESSURE IS INCREASED TO 2 PSI, A LINE PRESSURE | | | REGULATOR IS REQUIRED AT ALL THE EXISTING APPLIANCES. | | | FGC SECS. 401.4, 401.8, 402.1, 402.2, 402.3 OR FBCR | | | SECS.G2412.4, G2412.8, G2413.1, G2413.2, G2413.3. | | | | | | NOTE; I HAVE INCLUDED A COPY OF THE PLAN ON CITY FILE | | | FOR YOUR INFORMATION. | | | | | | | | | TIM LARGE | | | CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6692 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2017-06-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleahy |
Date |
2017-06-20 |
Time |
17:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2017-06-19 |
Time |
06:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-06-19 06:05:30 | 1) THERE ARE SEVERAL SETS OF DOCUMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN | | | SUBMITTED AND ALL THE SETS DO NOT CONTAIN THE SAME | | | SHEETS. THERE ARE LOOSE SHEETS THAT I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT | | | GOES WHERE. THIS SUBMITTAL IS VERY DISORGANIZED AND A | | | PLAN REVIEW COULD NOT BE PERFORMED.REMOVE ALL OLD PLAN | | | SHEETS AND ORGANIZE THE SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS INTO 2 | | | COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW. WPB AMEND. TO FBC SEC. | | | 107.2.1. 3RD REQUEST. NOTE: THE NEXT RESUBMITTAL WILL | | | BE SUBJECT TO 4 TIMES THE PLAN REVIEW FEE PER F.S. | | | 553.80 (2) (B). | | | | | | TIM LARGE | | | CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6692 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2017-06-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2017-06-05 |
Time |
07:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2017-06-05 |
Time |
05:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-06-05 06:07:46 | 1) THERE ARE 4 SETS OF DOCUMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN | | | SUBMITTED AND ALL THE SETS DO NOT CONTAIN THE SAME | | | SHEETS. ORGANIZE THE SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS INTO COMPLETE | | | SETS FOR REVIEW. WPB AMEND. TO FBC SEC. 107.2.1. 2ND | | | REQUEST. | | | 2) THE SURVEY AND ONE OF THE GAS PLANS SHOWS 1 INCH | | | UNDERGROUND PE AND ANOTHER GAS DRAWING SHOWS 3/4 INCH | | | PE. CLARIFY.2ND REQUEST. | | | 3) ONE OF THE GAS PLANS SHOWS A BTU LOAD OF 330,000 | | | BTU'S BUT THE MANUF. SPEC SHEETS FOR THE GENERATOR | | | SHOWS 281,000 BTU'S AT FULL LOAD. CLARIFY.2ND REQUEST. | | | 4) THE GAS APPLICATION NOTES A NEW GAS METER UNDER THE | | | DESCRIPTION OF WORK BUT THE PLANS SHOW AN EXISTING GAS | | | METER. CLARIFY.2ND REQUEST. | | | 5) THE GAS PLAN SHOWS A LOW PRESSURE SYSTEM BUT YOU | | | HAVE ALSO SUBMITTED A SIZING TABLE FOR A 2 PSI SYSTEM. | | | IF THIS IS NOT APPLICABLE REMOVE COPIES OF THIS | | | DOCUMENT FROM THE PLANS. WPB AMEND. TO FBC | | | SEC.107.2.1.2ND REQUEST. | | | | | | NOTE: NONE OF THE COMMENTS FROM THE FIRST REVIEW HAVE | | | BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | | | | TIM LARGE | | | CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6692 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2017-05-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2017-05-25 |
Time |
06:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2017-05-25 |
Time |
05:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-05-25 06:21:15 | 1) THERE ARE 4 SETS OF DOCUMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN | | | SUBMITTED AND ALL THE SETS DO NOT CONTAIN THE SAME | | | SHEETS. ORGANIZE THE SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS INTO COMPLETE | | | SETS FOR REVIEW. WPB AMEND. TO FBC SEC. 107.2.1. | | | 2) THE SURVEY AND ONE OF THE GAS PLANS SHOWS 1 INCH | | | UNDERGROUND PE AND ANOTHER GAS DRAWING SHOWS 3/4 INCH | | | PE. CLARIFY. | | | 3) ONE OF THE GAS PLANS SHOWS A BTU LOAD OF 330,000 | | | BTU'S BUT THE MANUF. SPEC SHEETS FOR THE GENERATOR | | | SHOWS 281,000 BTU'S AT FULL LOAD. CLARIFY. | | | 4) THE GAS APPLICATION NOTES A NEW GAS METER UNDER THE | | | DESCRIPTION OF WORK BUT THE PLANS SHOW AN EXISTING GAS | | | METER. CLARIFY. | | | 5) THE GAS PLAN SHOWS A LOW PRESSURE SYSTEM BUT YOU | | | HAVE ALSO SUBMITTED A SIZING TABLE FOR A 2 PSI SYSTEM. | | | IF THIS IS NOT APPLICABLE REMOVE COPIES OF THIS | | | DOCUMENT FROM THE PLANS. WPB AMEND. TO FBC SEC.107.2.1. | | | | | | TIM LARGE | | | CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6692 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2017-08-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2017-08-11 |
Time |
10:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2017-08-01 |
Time |
14:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-08-02 14:42:12 | RESUB ROUTED TO TKLARGE |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2017-07-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleahy |
Date |
2017-07-21 |
Time |
17:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleahy |
Date |
2017-07-17 |
Time |
08:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-07-19 08:31:19 | RESUB ROUTED TO TKLARGE |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2017-06-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleahy |
Date |
2017-06-20 |
Time |
17:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleahy |
Date |
2017-06-13 |
Time |
10:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-06-14 10:28:04 | RESUB ROUTED TO NJWIRA VIA ZONING INBOX |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2017-06-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2017-06-05 |
Time |
07:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2017-05-31 |
Time |
09:10 |
Sent To |
G |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2017-05-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2017-05-26 |
Time |
18:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2017-05-10 |
Time |
13:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-05-11 13:24:04 | ROUTED TO ZONING INBOX |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2017-06-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
njwira |
Date |
2017-06-15 |
Time |
09:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
njwira |
Date |
2017-06-14 |
Time |
14:40 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2017-05-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
njwira |
Date |
2017-05-17 |
Time |
16:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
njwira |
Date |
2017-05-11 |
Time |
16:43 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
|
|