Plan Review Details - Permit 17040807
Plan Review Stops For Permit 17040807
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 5 Status P Date 2018-03-22 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2018-03-22 Time 11:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2018-03-22 Time 11:12 Sent To I
Notes
2018-03-22 11:13:18****PROVISOS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 1. ACCESSIBLE SIGHT LINE REQUIRED PER FBC
 ACCCESSIBILITY 802. LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE SEATING,
 SIGHT LINES, COMPANION SEATING NOT CLEAR. PRIOR TO
 INSTALLATION OR C.O., THIS INFORMATION IS REQUIRED TO
 BE SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED. SUBJECT TO THE FIELD
 INSPECTOR'S DISCRETION, HE OR SHE MAY WAIVE THE
 REQUIREMENT.
  
 2. SHEET A0.05 AND OTHER SHEETS, A3 OCCUPANCY DECLARED.
 THIS APPEARS TO BE A2 OCCUPANCY. REVISE PLAN, SUBMIT AS
 A REVISION, OR HAVE ARCHITECT SEND RATIONALE FOR A3
 OCCUPANCY VIA EMAIL. THIS IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO C.O.
  
 3. THIS IS A THRESHOLD BUILDING PER FS 553. THREE SETS
 OF PLANS ARE REQUIRED. AS ONLY TWO SETS WERE SUBMITTED,
 HAVE A SET COPIED AFTER PERMIT ISSUANCE. THIS CAN BE
 DONE IN BLACK & WHITE, CANNOT BE USED FOR INSPECTION
 PURPOSES.
  
 4. PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR COMPONENTS AND CLADDING ARE TO
 BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO
 INSTALLATION. PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO BE REVIEWED BY
 DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THE BUILDING
 DIVISION.
  
 5. SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR FIRE ALARM, FIRE
 SPRINKLER, LANDSCAPING, FENCING, SIGNS, AWNINGS, ETC. -
 ONLY BUILDING, MEP ARE INCLUDED IN THIS PERMIT. SUB
 PERMITS REQUIRED FOR ROOF, MEP.
  
 6. IN THE EVENT OF ANY CONFLICT BETWEEN CIVIL SHEETS
 SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING DIVISION AND THE ENGINEERING
 DEPARTMENT, IT IS CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO
 CORRELATE.
  
 7. THIS IS A THRESHOLD BUILDING. CONTRACTOR IS TO MAKE
 A COPY OF THE PLANS STAMPED BY THE CITY FOR USE BY THE
 THRESHOLD INSPECTOR.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2018-03-15 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2018-03-15 Time 15:33 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2018-03-15 Time 15:33 Sent To  
Notes
2018-03-15 15:34:07****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014)
 FBC B = FBC BUILDING
 FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING
 FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY
 FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION
  
 1. VALUE IS LOWER THAN ICC TABLES PER SF; PROVIDE
 CONTRACT AND COST BREAKDOWN FOR REVIEW, OR AGREE FOR
 VALUE TO BE ADJUSTED TO ICC TABLES. THIS MAY BE
 ADDRESSED BY EMAIL.
  
 2. PLEASE REMOVE THE STEEL BUILDING PAGES FROM THE
 SUBMITTAL AS THEY WERE ALREADY APPROVED UNDER THE
 FOUNDATION/STRUCTURE PERMIT.
  
 3. SEE PREVIOUS LIST REGARDING ACCESSIBLE SIGHT LINE.
 RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT THIS IS ON THE "A" SHEETS,
 BUT I WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE THIS INFORMATION. THIS
 PERMIT WILL BE PASSED WITH PROVISO, COMPLIANCE
 REQUIRED, TO BE VERIFIED AT INSPECTION, REVISION
 REQUIRED SUBJECT TO FIELD INSPECTOR'S DISCRETION.
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2018-02-26 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2018-02-26 Time 17:31 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2018-02-12 Time 06:21 Sent To  
Notes
2018-02-28 06:49:54****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014)
 FBC B = FBC BUILDING
 FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING
 FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY
 FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION
  
 1. VALUE IS LOWER THAN ICC TABLES PER SF; PROVIDE
 CONTRACT AND COST BREAKDOWN FOR REVIEW, OR AGREE FOR
 VALUE TO BE ADJUSTED TO ICC TABLES. THIS MAY BE
 ADDRESSED BY EMAIL.
  
 2. PLEASE REMOVE THE STEEL BUILDING PAGES FROM THE
 SUBMITTAL AS THEY WERE ALREADY APPROVED UNDER THE
 FOUNDATION/STRUCTURE PERMIT.
  
 3. SEE PREVIOUS LIST REGARDING ACCESSIBLE SIGHT LINE.
 RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT THIS IS ON THE "A" SHEETS,
 BUT I WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE THIS INFORMATION. THIS
 PERMIT WILL BE PASSED WITH PROVISO, COMPLIANCE
 REQUIRED, TO BE VERIFIED AT INSPECTION, REVISION
 REQUIRED SUBJECT TO FIELD INSPECTOR'S DISCRETION.
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2017-09-22 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-09-22 Time 08:56 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-09-14 Time 12:11 Sent To  
Notes
2017-09-22 08:59:48***CORRECTIONS***
 REVISED 9/26/17 (ITEM #1)
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014)
 FBC B = FBC BUILDING
 FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING
 FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY
 FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION
  
 GREENE SCHOOL CLASSROOM & GYMNASIUM EXPANSION
 REVIEW #2
  
 COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS LIST:
  
 1. A GEOTECHNICAL REPORT IS REQUIRED, FBC B 1803.1.
 SEOR IS TO REVIEW THE SOILS REPORT; PROVIDE A SHOP
 DRAWING REVIEW, A REVIEW LETTER, OR INCORPORATE
 REFERENCE INTO THE PLAN. THE REPORT SUBMITTED IS FOR A
 PROJECT AT ANOTHER LOCATION; IT IS NOT CLEAR WHY THIS
 WAS SUBMITTED, FBC B 1803.1, FBC 107.
  
 2ND REVIEW, TWO SOILS REPORTS PROVIDED, THREE REQUIRED.
 ADVISE AS TO WHERE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER OF RECORD'S
 REVIEW CAN BE FOUND. IF NOT IN THE PLAN, PROVIDE A
 LETTER OR SHOP DRAWING REVIEW STAMP ON THE SOILS
 REPORT, FBC 107.
  
 **REVISED ON 9/26/17: IF THE FOUNDATION PERMIT 17060234
 HAS BEEN ISSUED PRIOR TO NEXT REVIEW FOR THIS PERMIT,
 THE SOILS REPORT WILL NOT REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED AS
 IT WILL BE A PART OF THE PERMIT RECORD. REVIEW BY SEOR
 IS STILL REQUIRED.**
  
 2-5. OK
  
 6. A SITE PLAN PREPARED BY A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IS
 REQUIRED TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC B TABLES 602, 705.
 THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED IS NOT SIGNED AND SEALED AND
 DOES NOT INCLUDE THIS INFORMATION.
  
 2ND REVIEW, SHEET A1.01 DOES NOT INCLUDE DIMENSIONS TO
 THE (PROPOSED NEW) PROPERTY LINES OR CENTERLINE OF
 STREET AS APPLICABLE. SEE FBC B TABLES 602, 705.
  
 7. FBC 109, PROJECT VALUE NOT CLEAR. A COPY OF THE
 CONTRACT, COST BREAKDOWN, OTHER INFORMATION MAY BE
 REQUIRED. AS SCOPE IS NOT CLEAR, A VALUATION ADJUSTMENT
 MAY BE DONE AT TIME OF 2ND REVIEW.
  
 2ND REVIEW, PROVIDE A COPY OF THE CONTRACT FOR THIS
 JOB. VALUE APPEARS LOW. A COST BREAKDOWN MAY BE
 REQUIRED.
  
 8. SEE PREVIOUS LIST REGARDING FBC B 503 COMPLIANCE.
 BUILDING APPEARS TO BE COMPLIANT BUT INFORMATION ON THE
 PLAN IS NOT CORRECT. SHEET A0.02 AND OTHER LOCATIONS,
 REVISE THE FOLLOWING (AND CHECK ALL):
  
 TYPE IIB AND TYPE IIIB CONSTRUCTION DECLARED (APPEARS
 TO BE TYPE IIIB, REVIEWED AS SUCH). REVISE; ONLY ONE IS
 APPLICABLE.
 A5 OCCUPANCY DECLARED; THIS IS FOR OUTDOOR SPORTS,
 REVISE, FBC B 303.5, 303.6.
  
 9. OK - UPDATE OCCUPANT LOAD IF ASSEMBLY OCC LOAD IS
 INCREASED
  
 10-11. OK
  
 12. SEATING AND SIGHT LINES FOR ASSEMBLY SEATING NOT
 CLEAR, REVISE PLAN TO CLARIFY FBC A 802. REVISE PLAN TO
 PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION ABOUT HOW THE SPACE WILL BE
 USED. IT APPEARS THAT COMPANION SEATING MAY ALSO BE
 REQUIRED. IF BLEACHER STYLE SEATING IS INCLUDED, WILL
 THE EXCEPTION OF FBC B 1006.2 BE USED? NO ELECTRICAL
 PLAN SUBMITTED; NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION PROVIDED TO
 DETERMINE CODE COMPLIANCE.
  
 2ND REVIEW, NOT CLEAR HOW THIS HAS BEEN ADDRESSED.
  
 13. OK
  
 14. 2ND REVIEW, SHEET A1.01 SHOWS A SAFE DISPERSAL AREA
 FBC B 1027.5 EXCEPTION (TO REQUIREMENT FOR EXIT
 DISCHARGE TO THE PUBLIC WAY). IF OCCUPANT LOAD IS
 INCREASED DUE TO OTHER COMMENTS, REVISE THIS PAGE.
 ALSO, REVISE THE PLAN TO LABEL THE ROW OF RECTANGLES
 (NOT CLEAR WHAT THIS IS).
  
 15. FBC A 207, REVISE PLAN TO DECLARE METHOD OF
 ACCESSIBLE MEANS OF EGRESS SELECTED. REVISE PLAN TO
 SHOW COMPLIANCE; SEE ALSO COMMENT #14.
  
 2ND REVIEW, NOT CLEAR HOW THIS WAS ADDRESSED. IBC2000
 OR IBC2003?
  
 16. THIS PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH PROVISO, COMPLIANCE
 WITH MEANS OF EGRESS ILLUMINATION, INCLUDING EXIT
 DISCHARGE TO THE PUBLIC WAY, IS TO COMPLY WITH FBC B
 1006.1. THIS WILL BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO C.O. REVISE PLAN
 TO NOTE REQUIREMENT.
  
 17-20. OK
  
 21. ENERGY CALCS WERE PROVIDED BUT APPEAR INCOMPLETE.
 INPUT REPORT DOES NOT SHOW WALLS, DOORS, WINDOWS,
 FENESTRATION, ROOF, ETC. FBC EC 103.
  
 NEW COMMENTS:
  
 22. SHEET A0.02, A0.03, POSSIBLY OTHER SHEETS, IT IS
 NOT CLEAR WHAT WORK IS EXISTING, COVERED BY OTHER
 PERMIT(S), OR PROPOSED UNDER THIS PERMIT. VERIFY THAT
 THE NORTH INDICATOR IS CORRECT ON ALL SHEETS. THE FLOOR
 PLAN FOR EXISTING BUILDING HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED AT
 THIS TIME. IF THIS IS TO BE INCLUDED IN THE SCOPE OF
 THIS PERMIT, REVISE PLAN TO INDICATE WHAT WORK IS
 PROPOSED. IF THIS WAS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATION ONLY,
 PLEASE LABEL AS SUCH.
  
 23. A0.04, SEE FIRE COMMENTS, FBC B 1004, PROVIDE
 RATIONALE FOR 15SF PER PERSON FOR THE GYMNASIUM. NO
 SEATING IS SHOWN. FOR ALL ASSEMBLY AREAS (PROPOSED, AND
 WHAT MAY BE EXISTING) THE PLAN LACKS CLARIFICATION
 REGARDING THE USE OF THE SPACES.
  
 F0R INSTANCE, GYMANSIUM; WILL THIS BE USED FOR ANY
 PURPOSE OTHER THAN A BASKETBALL COURT WHICH IS SHOWN
 GRAPHICALLY?.
  
 A0.02, WHAT IS THE USE OF THE 1,315 SF ASSEMBLY SPACE?
  
 24. A0.05 AND OTHER SHEETS, WHAT IS THE USE OF THE "FAB
 LAB", FBC 107, REVISE PLAN TO INCLUDE DESCRIPTON.
 A0.04, A0.05, POSSIBLY OTHER LOCATIONS, TEACHER
 PLANNING ROOM TEXT NOT LEGIBLE, REVISE.
  
 25. VESTIBULES 109A, 208A, REVISE PLAN TO SHOW 18"
 MANEUVERING CLEARANCE REQUIRED BY FBC A
  
 26. 3-A5.51 INCLUDES A REFERENCE TO "FBC 2015", REVISE
 AND CHECK ALL.
  
 27. FBC ACCESSIBILITY, PROVIDE DETAILS FOR BATHROOMS
 AND FIXTURES.
  
 28. FBC A 212.3, SHEET A 5.51, CLARIFY LOCATION OF
 SINKS DETAILS 2 AND 3.
  
 29. THREE COMPLETE IDENTICAL COLLATED SETS OF PERMIT
 DOCUMENTS AND PLANS REQUIRED, FBC 107. FAILURE TO
 PROVIDE THREE SETS FOR EACH REVIEW CYCLE MAY RESULT IN
 DELAY AT TIME OF ISSUANCE.
  
 30. THE DELEGATED ENGINEERING (BUILDING SHELL) IS
 REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED, SEALED, DATED ORIGINALS, FS471.
 THEY ARE TO BE REVIEWED BY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER OF
 RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL. THEY MAY BE PROVIDED IN THE
 NEXT SUBMITTAL OR MAY BE A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL
 (SUBMITTED, REVIEWED, AND ISSUED PRIOR TO
 INSTALLATION).
  
 31. FBC B TABLE 1607.1(26), SHEET S002 AND E1 OF 68,
 300# CONCENTRATED REQUIRED FOR ROOF, REVISE.
  
 32. FBC 107, PROVIDE THE COVER SHEET FOR EACH FLORIDA
 STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL. THIS WAS PROVIDED FOR SOME BUT
 NOT ALL OF THE PRODUCT APPROVALS. ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS
 AND RELATED INFORMATION (METHOD OF FASTENING PROPOSED)
 MAY BE A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL.
  
 33. VERIFY THAT PRODUCT APPROVALS HAVE PRINTED
 PROPERLY; SEE NOA 16-0208.08.
  
 34. ROOF DECK PRODUCT APPROVALS, WALL PANEL PRODUCT
 APPROVALS, INDICATE WHICH METHOD OF FASTENING IS
 PROPOSED, FBC B 1609. THIS MAY BE A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL.
  
 34. WHEN RESUBMITTING, PROVIDE THREE IDENTICAL COLLATED
 SETS OF PLANS AND PERMIT DOCUMENTS. THE SUPPORTING
 DOCUMENTS MAY BE IN A BINDER BUT IF SUBMITTED IN THIS
 MANNER SHOULD HAVE THREE BINDERS. REMOVE OLD SHEETS
 FROM THE BOUND SETS, MARK VOID AND RETAIN IN THE
 SUBMITTAL (BUT NOT IN THE PLANS FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE).
 ALL CHANGES SHOULD BE CLOUDED AND MARKED WITH REVISION
 #.
  
 35. FS553.80(2)(B), WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF
 DESIGN PROFESSIONALS? DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT
 FINDS IT NECESSARY, IN ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH
 THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT
 DESIGN DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE
 TIMES FOR FAILURE TO CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION
 SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY NOTED IN EACH REJECTION,
 INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION,
 STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING,
 VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS
 SYSTEMS, OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF
 THE FLORIDA BUILDING COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH
 TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED
 FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT
 OF THE PROPORTION OF THE PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS
 REVIEW.
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2017-05-02 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-05-02 Time 09:16 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-04-27 Time 07:32 Sent To  
Notes
2017-05-02 09:16:18****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014)
 FBC B = FBC BUILDING
 FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING
 FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY
 FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION
  
 GREENE SCHOOL CLASSROOM & GYMNASIUM EXPANSION
  
 1. A GEOTECHNICAL REPORT IS REQUIRED, FBC B 1803.1.
 SEOR IS TO REVIEW THE SOILS REPORT; PROVIDE A SHOP
 DRAWING REVIEW, A REVIEW LETTER, OR INCORPORATE
 REFERENCE INTO THE PLAN.
  
 THE REPORT SUBMITTED IS FOR A PROJECT AT ANOTHER
 LOCATION; IT IS NOT CLEAR WHY THIS WAS SUBMITTED, FBC B
 1803.1, FBC 107.
  
 3. SCOPE NOT CLEAR. THE APPLICATION IS FOR "PROPOSED
 NEW CLASSROOM & GYMNASIUM ADDITION TO EXIST. SCHOOL".
 THE EXPEDITED REVIEW REQUEST STATES "FOUNDATION &
 FOOTING/DEMO PER DISCUSSION W/JIM WITMER." THE COVER
 PAGE T1 APPEARS TO BE FOR THE COMPLETE BUILDING. OTHER
 PAGES STATE "REVIEW SET - SHELL & FOUNDATION
 DOCUMENTS." SOME OF THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MAY NOT BE
 APPLICABLE; AN ACCURATE REVIEW CANNOT BE DONE WITHOUT
 KNOWING SCOPE OF THIS PERMIT.
  
 IT IS NOT CLEAR WHETHER THIS APPLICATION IS FOR THE
 FOUNDATION, STRUCTURE, OR BUILDING.
  
 IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO OBTAIN A FOUNDATION PERMIT, THE
 FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED:
  
 PERMIT APPLICATION WHICH STATES SCOPE (FOR FOUNDATION
 PERMIT, TYPICALLY FOOTINGS OR FOOTINGS AND SLAB)
 GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
 SURVEY DRAWING
 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
 SITE PLAN
 1ST FLOOR ARCHITECTURAL PLAN
 ARCHITECTURAL CROSS SECTION(S) OF THE BUILDING
 FOUNDATION PLAN
 FOUNDATION DETAILS AND CROSS SECTIONS
 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER'S GENERAL NOTES
 UNDERGROUND PLUMBING PLAN (IF APPLICABLE)
 ELECTRICAL PLAN SHOWING ANY UNDERGROUND CONDUIT (IF
 APPLICABLE)
 ELECTRICAL GROUNDING TO STEEL DETAIL, IF APPLICABLE (OR
 EXPLAIN WHY THIS IS NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS PROJECT).
 IF REQUIRED, A DETAIL IS REQUIRED AS A REVIEW, PERMIT,
 AND INSPECTION ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONCRETE POUR
 PLAN SHOWING UNDERGROUND FIRE LINE
 THRESHOLD INSPECTION PLAN OR RESIDENT INSPECTION PLAN
 (AS APPLICABLE)
  
 4. EXPEDITED REVIEW REQUESTS THAT "DEMO" IS PART OF THE
 SCOPE. IF THIS IS FOR A FREE STANDING BUILDING WHICH
 NEEDS TO BE DEMOLISHED, THIS REQUIRES A SEPARATE
 PERMIT. SUBMIT A BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION AND THE
 INFORMATION REQUIRED BY THE DEMOLITION APPLICATION,
 DEMOLITION DEBRIS DISPOSAL FEE, AND DEMOLITION PERMIT
 APPLICATION CHECKLIST.
  
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/DEVELOPMENT-SERVICES/FORMS/B
 UILDING-PERMIT-FORMS
  
 IF DEMOLITION IS LIMITED TO THE NOTES ON SHEET A1.00,
 WORK WITHIN THE PROPERTY BOUNDARY WILL BE INCLUDED IN
 THIS PERMIT.
  
 5. THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT APPEARS TO CROSS PROPERTY
 LINES. IS A REPLAT OR UNITY OF TITLE PROPOSED? FBC
 CHAPTER 7, PROVIDE INFORMATION REGARDING THE REPLAT OR
 UNITY.
  
 THIS PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH PROVISO, REPLAT OR
 UNITY OF TITLE (AS APPLICABLE) REQUIRED PRIOR TO C.O.
  
 6. A SITE PLAN PREPARED BY A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IS
 REQUIRED TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC B TABLES 602, 705.
 THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED IS NOT SIGNED AND SEALED AND
 DOES NOT INCLUDE THIS INFORMATION.
  
 7. FBC 109, PROJECT VALUE NOT CLEAR. A COPY OF THE
 CONTRACT, COST BREAKDOWN, OTHER INFORMATION MAY BE
 REQUIRED. AS SCOPE IS NOT CLEAR, A VALUATION ADJUSTMENT
 MAY BE DONE AT TIME OF 2ND REVIEW.
  
 8. COMPLIANCE WITH FBC B TABLE 503 NOT CLEAR. SHEET
 A0.02 DECLARES TYPE III B CONSTRUCTION, 54,375 SF
 REQUIRED. HOW HAS THIS NUMBER BEEN ASCERTAINED? REVISE
 PLAN TO INCLUDE AREA INCREASE CALCULATIONS FBC B 506.
  
 IT IS NOT CLEAR IF THIS IS MIXED USE, SEPARATED OR
 MIXED USE, NON SEPARATED. PLAN NOTES THAT SEPARATION
 BETWEEN A AND E IS 0, BUT DOES NOT INCLUDE BUSINESS
 WHICH REQUIRES FIRE RATED SEPARATION IF THIS IS MIXED
 USE, SEPARATED.
  
 9. REVISE PLAN TO INCLUDE OCCUPANT LOAD TOTALS, SQUARE
 FOOT AREA TOTALS (OCCUPANCY ANALYSIS), FBC 107. THIS
 INFORMATION IS REQUIRED TO PRINT ON THE C.O.
  
 10. SUBMIT FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS, FBC 107.3.5.1.1.
  
 11. FBC A 201, 202.2, 206.3, CLARIFY THE GENERAL
 CIRCULATION PATH AND THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE. REVISE PLAN
 TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENT OF FBC A 206.3
 "ACCESSIBLE ROUTES SHAL COINCIDE WITH OR BE LOCATED IN
 THE SAME AREA AS GENERAL CIRCULATION PATHS. WHERE
 CIRCULATION PATHS ARE INTERIOR, REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE
 ROUTES SHALL ALSO BE INTERIOR."
  
 IT APPEARS THAT THE GENERAL CIRCULATION PATH FOR
 OCCUPANTS IN THE FIRST FLOOR ADDITION WHO SUBSEQUENTLY
 WISH TO ACCESS THE SECOND FLOOR VIA STAIRS HAS AN
 INTERIOR ROUTE VIA STAIRS, BUT IT APPEARS THAT AN
 OCCUPANT UNABLE TO UTILIZE STAIRS IS COMPELLED TO EXIT
 THE BUILDING TO ACCESS THE ELEVATOR.
  
 REVISE PLAN TO CLARIFY THE GENERAL CIRCULATION PATH,
 SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENT THAT THE ROUTE
 COINCIDES AND IS INTERIOR.
  
 FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU WISH TO DISCUSS.
  
 12. SEATING AND SIGHT LINES FOR ASSEMBLY SEATING NOT
 CLEAR, REVISE PLAN TO CLARIFY FBC A 802. REVISE PLAN TO
 PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION ABOUT HOW THE SPACE WILL BE
 USED. IT APPEARS THAT COMPANION SEATING MAY ALSO BE
 REQUIRED. IF BLEACHER STYLE SEATING IS INCLUDED, WILL
 THE EXCEPTION OF FBC B 1006.2 BE USED? NO ELECTRICAL
 PLAN SUBMITTED; NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION PROVIDED TO
 DETERMINE CODE COMPLIANCE.
  
 13. THE AREA OVER THE GYM IS CALLED A SECOND FLOOR IN
 SOME PLACES AND A MEZZANINE IN OTHERS. REVISE PLAN TO
 DEFINE WHETHER THIS IS TO BE TREATED AS A MEZZANINE OR
 SECOND FLOOR, SEE FBC B 505 (MEZZANINES), 404
 (ATRIUMS), REVISE PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE, INCLUDING
 APPLICABLE EXCEPTIONS UTILIZED.
  
 14. THE LIFE SAFETY PLAN IS NOT CLEAR AS TO EXIT
 DISCHARGE TO THE PUBLIC WAY, REVISE TO INCLUDE OR
 PROVIDE ANOTHER SHEET WHICH CLARIFIES, FBC B 1027. THE
 SITE PLAN PROVIDED IS NOT SIGNED AND SEALED AND
 THEREFORE CANNOT BE USED TO SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE.
  
 15. FBC A 207, REVISE PLAN TO DECLARE METHOD OF
 ACCESSIBLE MEANS OF EGRESS SELECTED. REVISE PLAN TO
 SHOW COMPLIANCE; SEE ALSO COMMENT #14.
  
 16. THIS PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH PROVISO, COMPLIANCE
 WITH MEANS OF EGRESS ILLUMINATION, INCLUDING EXIT
 DISCHARGE TO THE PUBLIC WAY, IS TO COMPLY WITH FBC B
 1006.1. THIS WILL BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO C.O. REVISE PLAN
 TO NOTE REQUIREMENT.
  
 17. FBC 481.321, ALL FINAL PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, OR
 REPORTS PREPARED OR ISSUED BY THE REGISTERED LANDSCAPE
 ARCHITECT AND FILED FOR PUBLIC RECORD SHALL BE SIGNED
 BY THE REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, DATED, AND
 STAMPED OR SEALED ELECTRONICALLY WITH HER OR HIS SEAL.
 THE PAGES WHICH APPEAR TO BE PREPARED BY JON E. SCHMIDT
 AND ASSOCIATES ARE NOT SIGNED AND SEALED.
  
 18. A0.13, DOOR HARDWARE INFORMATION IS LACKING. FBC B
 1008.1.10, NOTE PANIC OR FIRE EXIT HARDWARE REQUIRED.
  
 19. A0.2 OCCUPANCY ANALYSIS SQUARE FEET TOTALS 19,553
 (11,901 1ST FLOOR, 7,652 2ND FLOOR); THERE IS A
 DISCREPANCY OF 9,339, REVISE PLAN TO CLARIFY.
  
 20. A0.2 BUSINESS AREAS ARE SHOWN AS 3 OCCUPANTS BUT
 ARE OVER 300 SF; PLEASE REVISE TO 4, REVISE ANY OTHER
 FRACTION OF OCCUPANTS UP RATHER THAN DOWN, FBC 1004.
  
 21. FBC EC 103, SUBMIT ENERGY CALCS. THIS IS REQUIRED
 FOR A PERMIT FOR BOTH THE BUILDING AND STRUCTURE (SCOPE
 UNDER THIS PERMIT NOT CLEAR AT THIS TIME). THIS IS NOT
 REQUIRED FOR A FOUNDATION ONLY.
  
 22. SEE IMPACT FEE REVIEW.
  
 23. SEE THRESHOLD REVIEW. THRESHOLD STATEMENT TO BE ON
 ALL PLANS PREPARED BY ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER OF RECORD;
 THREE SETS REQUIRED; SI REQUIRED, SEE THRESHOLD REVIEW
 FOR SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS.
  
 24. FBC 107, THREE COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND PERMIT
 DOCUMENTS REQUIRED.
  
 25. THE SIGNATURE OBSCURES THE ARCHITECT'S PRINTED NAME
 AND LICENSE NUMBER; PLEASE RELOCATE THIS INFORMATION OR
 THE SIGNATURE AND SEAL, FS481. PLEASE DO THIS ONLY FOR
 SHEETS WHICH CHANGE.
  
 26. INDEX SHEET STATES THAT MEP IS NOT APPLICABLE FOR
 THIS SUBMISSION. IF THIS IS AN APPLICATION FOR THE
 BUILDING, PROVIDE PLANS, FBC 107. A COMPLETE REVIEW
 CANNOT BE DONE AT THIS TIME DUE TO INSUFFICIENT
 INFORMATION.
  
 27. MYFLORIDALICENSE.COM DOES NOT SHOW THAT ANDREW
 MORGAN, PE HAS TAKEN THE ADVANCED FBC COURSE REQUIRED
 BY FS 471.0195, PLEASE ADDRESS (PROVIDE EVIDENCE THAT
 THE COURSE WAS TAKEN TO FBPE, REQUEST THAT THE DBPR
 WEBSITE BE UPDATED).
  
 28. PERMIT APPLICATION 16080972 IS EXPIRED/ABANDONED;
 ADDRESS. OTHER PERMITS ARE ALSO EXPIRED OR APPEAR TO
 EXPIRE SOON, PLEASE ADDRESS AT THIS TIME - FOR
 INSTANCE, 16061325. THIS COMMENT WILL NOT DELAY PERMIT
 ISSUANCE, BUT PLEASE ADVISE AS TO HOW THIS IS BEING
 ADDRESSED.
  
 29. S002, REVISE LOAD CHART TO INCLUDE 2ND
 FLOOR/MEZZANINE ASSEMBLY AREA, FBC B TABLE 1607.1.
  
 30. RE: REBAR LAP DIMENSION, S001 NOTE 8 STATES 48 BAR
 "TYPICALLY", CLARIFY WHEN THIS IS NOT THE CASE OR
 REVISE NOTE, FBC 107.
  
 31. S401 NOTE 12 PROVIDES A SPEC FOR SHOWER SLAB; IT IS
 NOT CLEAR WHERE THE SHOWERS ARE LOCATED, REVISE PLAN TO
 CLARIFY, FBC 107.
  
 32. CONTRACTOR HAS OBJECTED TO THE CLASSIFICATION OF
 THRESHOLD BUILDING. THIS DETERMINATION WAS MADE PER
 FS553.71(11) AND INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE ARCHITECT
 ON THE PLAN:
  
 TWO STORY 28,892 SQUARE FOOT ADDITION TO AN EXISTING
 18,374 SQUARE FOOT EXISTING SCHOOL WITH AN
 OCCUPANT LOAD (ADDITION) OF 658 ON THE 1ST FLOOR,457 ON
 THE 2ND FLOOR, NO OCCUPANT LOAD/OCCUPANCY
 CLASSIFICATION INFORMATION PROVIDED FOR THE EXISTING
 SCHOOL (THAT INFORMATION DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE REQUIRED
 FOR THIS REVIEW)
  
 IF ARCHITECT DISAGREES THAT THIS IS TO BE CLASSIFIED AS
 A THRESHOLD BUILDING AND IF ARCHITECT ELECTS TO REDUCE
 THE OCCUPANT LOAD, THEN INFORMATION REGARDING THE
 EXISTING BUILDING IS REQUIRED - OCCUPANCY
 CLASSIFICATION BROKEN DOWN BY SQUARE FOOT, OCCUPANT
 LOAD INCLUDING FACTOR USED PER FBC B TABLE 1004.1.2.
  
 NOTE 9, SHEET A0.02 REGARDING THE MAX OCCUPANCY (400
 GYMNASIUM, 150 STUDENT CAP) IS ACKNOWLEDGED; HOWEVER,
 THIS APPEARS TO BE A ZONING OR LOGISTIC CAPACITY WHICH
 IS NOT TYPICALLY UTILIZED FOR THE PURPOSE OF LIFE
 SAFETY.
  
 IF ARCHITECT DOES NOT AGREE THAT THIS IS A THRESHOLD
 BUILDING, REVISE PLAN TO DETAIL THE PROPOSED USE OF
 SPACE(S) AND JUSTIFICATION FOR UTILIZING AN OCCUPANT
 LOAD LOWER THAN FBC B TABLE 1004.1.2.
  
 PLEASE NOTE THAT THE OCCUPANT LOAD ON THE PLAN
 SUBMITTED COMPLIES WITH THE TABLE AND IS ACCEPTABLE.
 THIS COMMENT IS MADE PURSUANT TO A NUMBER OF EMAILS
 FROM THE CONTRACTOR WHEREIN HE OBJECTED TO THE
 THRESHOLD BUILDING CLASSIFICATION.
  
 33. APPLICABLE TO ALL COMMENTS - IF DESIGN PROFESSIONAL
 DISAGREES WITH ANY OF THE COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT ME
 TO RESOLVE OR CLARIFY PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL.
  
 34. CIVIL SHEETS, PARKING LOT, NOT REVIEWED. A SEPARATE
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THE PARKING LOT, FBC 107.
  
 35. THE PLANS ARE NOT COMPLETE IF THIS APPLICATION IS
 FOR A BUILDING (AS PER THE PERMIT APPLICATION). IF THIS
 IS FOR THE BUILDING, PROVIDE PLANS (ACCESSIBILITY
 DETAILS, BATHROOMS, MEP, FIRE SPRINKLER, STAIRS, ETC.),
 FBC 107, FBC B 468.
  
 36. PROVIDE WALL TYPES. S SHEETS HAVE AN IDENTIFIER FOR
 INTERIOR MASONRY WALLS. FOOTINGS ARE NOTED AS WALL
 FOOTINGS BUT IT IS NOT CLEAR WHETHER OR NOT THERE ARE
 WALLS OVER ALL OF THE WALL FOOTINGS, SUCH AS THE
 BREEZEWAY. UNABLE TO LOCATE WALL TYPES ON A OR S
 SHEETS.
  
 37. ALL ITEMS OTHER THAN THE BUILDING STRUCTURE,
 MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING REQUIRE SEPARATE
 PERMITS - APPLICATION, PLANS, REVIEWS, FEES. SEPARATE
 PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR PARKING LOT, SITE LIGHTING,
 SIGNAGE, ETC.
  
 SEPARATE SUB PERMITS REQUIRED FOR MECHANICAL,
 ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING; SUBMIT SUB PERMIT APPLICATION
 PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT.
  
  
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2018-02-02 Cont ID  
Sent By jpearson Date 2018-02-02 Time 08:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jpearson Date 2018-02-02 Time 08:25 Sent To  
Notes
2018-02-02 08:26:30APPROVED WITH EXCEPTION. MUST PROVIDE LOAD CALCULATION
 FOR EXISTING SERVICE PRIOR TO INSPECTION. NEC 220
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2017-08-31 Cont ID  
Sent By jpearson Date 2017-08-31 Time 10:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jpearson Date 2017-08-31 Time 10:48 Sent To  
Notes
2017-08-31 10:48:12CODES IN EFFECT:
 FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2014 5TH EDITION
 FBC CE = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ENERGY CONSERVATION 2014
 5TH EDITION
 FBC RE = FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE 2014 5TH EDITION,
 PART VIII ELECTRICAL
 NEC = NFPA 70 2011 EDITION, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE
 FS = FLORIDA STATUTES
  
 ELECTRICAL REVIEW STATUS: DENIED, SEE COMMENTS BELOW.
  
 1. PROVIDE RECEPTACLE CONTROL REQUIRED BY ASHREA 90.1:
 8.4.2. FBC CE 405.7.1
 2. RISER DIAGRAM SHOWS EXISTING SERVICE BEING RE-FEED
 AND A "PANEL K" BEING ADDED. PROVIDE MORE DETAILS FOR
 THIS EXISTING SERVICE. WHY IS IT RE-FEED? WHY IS A
 PANEL BEING ADDED? WHAT IS THIS PANEL FEEDING? SHOW
 AREA OF WORK FOR PANEL K AND ALL ASSOCIATED
 INSTALLATION, PROVIDE PANEL SCHEDULE. WHAT IS THE LOAD
 CALCULATION FOR THIS SERVICE? WHERE IS THIS SERVICE
 LOCATED? WHAT IS THE DISTANCE FROM NEW CT LOCATION TO
 EXISTING SERVICE? PROVIDE VOLTAGE DROP CALCULATION.
 RISER SHOWS 3 SETS OF 4-400 KCMIL WITH A 2/0 EQUIPMENT
 GROUNDING CONDUCTOR (EGC). WHY DOES THIS CONDUIT HAVE
 AN EGC? IS THERE A MAIN DISCONNECT NOT SHOWN? WHAT IS
 THE ROUTING OF THIS CONDUIT WITH WIRES THAT HAVE NO
 OVERCURRENT PROTECTION? MANY DETAILS ARE NEEDED. FBC
 107.2.1
 3. PROVIDE MORE DETAIL FOR THE GROUNDING ELECTRODE
 SYSTEM. WHERE IS THE EXISTING GE SYSTEM AND HOW WILL
 THIS SYSTEM BE CONNECTED TO IT? SHOW ALL AVAILABLE
 GROUNDING ELECTRODES AND THE METHOD OF CONNECTION. NEC
 250.50; FBC 107.2.1
 4. PROVIDE A BLOCK NOTE WHERE APPLICABLE INDICATING THE
 REQUIRED SEPARATE PERMITS AND DATA SPECIFICATION SHEET
 SUBMITTALS FOR LOW VOLTAGE SYSTEMS, FIRE ALARM, CCTV,
 PHONE AND DATA, WIRELESS SYSTEMS, WALK-IN COOLERS,
 HOODS, SOLAR, ETC. FBC 105.1
 5. RISER SHOWS THE TESLA POWERWALL CONNECTED TO PANEL
 IT, BUT PANEL MDP SHOWS SOLAR TIE IN. PROVIDE
 CLARIFICATION. NEC 215.5, FBC 107.2.1
 6. PROVIDE AVAILABLE SHORT CIRCUIT CALCULATION FOR EACH
 PANEL INCLUDING INFORMATION FROM THE POWER COMPANY
 STATING WHAT THE AVAILABLE SHORT CIRCUIT CURRENT IS FOR
 THE SERVICE TO CONFIRM THE STATED AIC RATING OF THE
 SERVICE EQUIPMENT AND DOWNSTREAM PANELS IS ADEQUATE.
 NEC 110.9, 110.10
 7. PROVIDE NOTES TO INDICATE THE REQUIRED MARKING OF
 SERVICE EQUIPMENT FOR ARC FLASH HAZARD WARNING AND
 AVAILABLE FAULT CURRENT PER CODE. NEC 110.16, 110.24
 8. PROVIDE INTERSYSTEM BONDING TERMINATION POINT. NEC
 250.94
 9. PROVIDE NOTE THAT EXIT AND EMERGENCY LIGHTS WILL BE
 CONNECTED TO THE LIGHTING CIRCUIT IN THE AREA AHEAD OF
 ANY CONTROL. NEC 700.12(F)
 10. PROVIDE MANUFACTURERS SPEC SHEETS FOR LIGHT
 FIXTURES TO CONFIRM LISTING. NEC 110.3
  
 PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED
 MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. WHEN
 RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE
 LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY
 RESUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, INSERT CORRECTED PAGES
 INTO THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE OR VOID THE
 PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS.
  
 SINCERELY,
  
 JOHN PEARSON
 ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER
 561-805-6746
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2017-04-28 Cont ID  
Sent By jleahy Date 2017-04-28 Time 15:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jleahy Date 2017-04-28 Time 15:42 Sent To  
Notes
2017-04-28 15:43:10JAKE LEAHY
 ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER II
 BN1165, BU1753, PX163
 561-805-6713
  
  
 NO ELECTRICAL SHOWN ON PLANS.
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2017-09-26 Cont ID  
Sent By mgonzale Date 2017-09-26 Time   Rev Time 1.00
Received By mgonzale Date 2017-09-26 Time   Sent To ENG
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2017-04-27 Cont ID  
Sent By Mgonzale Date 2017-04-27 Time   Rev Time 1.00
Received By mgonzale Date 2017-04-27 Time   Sent To I
Notes
2017-04-27 10:26:27**** IMPORTANT ****
  
 #1 DISCUSS WITH CITY OF WPB ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
 CUTTING AND CAPPING OF EXISTING WATERMAIN.
 FORMAL SUBMITTAL SHALL BE MADE TO CITY OF WPB
 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT.
  
 #2 DISCUSS TIMELINE FOR WORK AND ENGINEERING ROW
 PERMIT.
  
 #3 PROVIDE ENGINEER'S COST ESTIMATE FOR UTILITY WORK.
  
 MANUEL JULIAN GONZALEZ
 ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR
 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR
 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401
 (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402)
 MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200
 DIRECT: (561) 494-1085
 FAX: (561) 494-1116
 EMAIL: [email protected]
 HTTP://WWW.WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS
 /FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2018-01-30 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 2018-01-30 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 2018-01-30 Time 10:47 Sent To  
Notes
2018-01-30 11:16:23THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 PLEASE CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING AS PROVISO:
  
 THESE PROVISO COMMENTS WILL BE VERIFIED AND CONFIRMED
 AT THE TIME OF FIRE INSPECTION. FAILURE TO FOLLOW THESE
 PROVISO COMMENTS WILL RESULT IN A FAILED FIRE
 INSPECTION.
  
  
 1) LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS-TYPE FLOOR AND ROOF SIGN IS
 REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE.
  
 THE TYPE OF DESIGN YOU HAVE INDICATED IS INCLUDED AS
 LIGHTWEIGHT FLOOR AND ROOF.
  
 633.222?BUILDINGS WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS-TYPE
 CONSTRUCTION; NOTICE REQUIREMENTS; ENFORCEMENT.?
 (1)?THE OWNER OF ANY COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL
 STRUCTURE, OR ANY MULTIUNIT RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE OF
 THREE UNITS OR MORE, THAT USES LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS-TYPE
 CONSTRUCTION SHALL MARK THE STRUCTURE WITH A SIGN OR
 SYMBOL APPROVED BY THE STATE FIRE MARSHAL IN A MANNER
 SUFFICIENT TO WARN PERSONS CONDUCTING FIRE CONTROL AND
 OTHER EMERGENCY OPERATIONS OF THE EXISTENCE OF
 LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS-TYPE CONSTRUCTION IN THE STRUCTURE.
  
 (2)?THE STATE FIRE MARSHAL SHALL ADOPT RULES NECESSARY
 TO IMPLEMENT THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION, INCLUDING,
 BUT NOT LIMITED TO:
 (A)?THE DIMENSIONS AND COLOR OF SUCH SIGN OR SYMBOL.
  
 (B)?THE TIME WITHIN WHICH COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, AND
 MULTIUNIT RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES THAT USE LIGHT-FRAME
 TRUSS-TYPE CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE MARKED AS REQUIRED BY
 THIS SECTION.
  
 (C)?THE LOCATION ON EACH COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, AND
 MULTIUNIT RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE THAT USES LIGHT-FRAME
 TRUSS-TYPE CONSTRUCTION WHERE SUCH SIGN OR SYMBOL MUST
 BE POSTED.
  
 (3)?THE STATE FIRE MARSHAL, AND LOCAL FIRE OFFICIALS IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH S. 633.118, SHALL ENFORCE THIS SECTION.
 AN OWNER WHO FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF
 THIS SECTION IS SUBJECT TO PENALTIES AS PROVIDED IN S.
 633.228.
  
  
 69A-60.0081 NOTICE REQUIRED FOR STRUCTURES WITH
 LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS-TYPE CONSTRUCTION.
 (1) PURPOSE: THE PURPOSE OF THIS RULE IS TO REQUIRE THE
 PLACEMENT OF AN IDENTIFYING SYMBOL ON STRUCTURES
 CONSTRUCTED WITH A LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS COMPONENT IN A
 MANNER SUFFICIENT TO WARN PERSONS CONDUCTING FIRE
 CONTROL AND OTHER EMERGENCY OPERATIONS OF THE EXISTENCE
 OF LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS-TYPE CONSTRUCTION IN THE
 STRUCTURE.
 (2) DEFINITIONS.
 (A) ?LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS-TYPE CONSTRUCTION? MEANS A TYPE
 OF CONSTRUCTION WHOSE PRIMARY STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS ARE
 FORMED BY A SYSTEM OF REPETITIVE WOOD OR LIGHT GAUGE
 STEEL FRAMING MEMBERS.
 (B) ?APPROVED SYMBOL? MEANS A MALTESE CROSS MEASURING 8
 INCHES HORIZONTALLY AND 8 INCHES VERTICALLY, OF A
 BRIGHT RED REFLECTIVE COLOR, DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE
 WITH FIGURE 1.
 (3) ANY COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, OR MULTIUNIT
 RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE OF THREE UNITS OR MORE, WHICH
 USES HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS-TYPE
 CONSTRUCTION IN ANY PORTION SHALL BE MARKED WITH AN
 APPROVED SYMBOL. TOWNHOUSES ARE NOT MULTIUNIT
 RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES AND THEREFORE NOT SUBJECT TO
 THIS RULE. EACH APPROVED SYMBOL SHALL INCLUDE WITHIN
 THE CENTER CIRCLE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING DESIGNATIONS:
 (A) STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS ROOFS SHALL BE
 MARKED WITH THE LETTER ?R?.
 (B) STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS FLOOR SYSTEMS
 SHALL BE MARKED WITH THE LETTER ?F?.
 (C) STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS FLOOR AND ROOF
 SYSTEMS SHALL BE MARKED WITH THE LETTERS ?RF.?
 (4) THE APPROVED SYMBOL SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN 24
 INCHES TO THE LEFT OF THE MAIN ENTRY DOOR AND:
 (A) BE PERMANENTLY ATTACHED TO THE FACE OF THE
 STRUCTURE ON A CONTRASTING BACKGROUND; OR
 (B) BE MOUNTED ON A CONTRASTING BASE MATERIAL WHICH IS
 THEN PERMANENTLY ATTACHED TO THE FACE OF THE STRUCTURE.
 (5) THE DISTANCE ABOVE THE GRADE, WALKING SURFACE OR
 THE FINISHED FLOOR TO THE BOTTOM OF THE SYMBOL SHALL BE
 NOT LESS THAN 4 FEET (48 IN.).
 (6) THE DISTANCE ABOVE THE GRADE, WALKING SURFACE OR
 THE FINISHED FLOOR TO THE TOP OF THE SYMBOL SHALL BE
 NOT MORE THAN 6 FEET (72 IN.).
 (7) IN SINGLE TENANT STRUCTURES WITH MULTIPLE MAIN
 ENTRY DOORS, SUCH AS BIG BOX RETAIL STORES, DEPARTMENT
 STORES AND GROCERY STORES, THE AUTHORITY HAVING
 JURISDICTION IS AUTHORIZED TO REQUIRE THAT OTHER MAIN
 ENTRY DOORS OF THE STRUCTURE BE MARKED WITH AN APPROVED
 SYMBOL TO CARRY OUT THE PURPOSE IN SUBSECTION (1)
 ABOVE.
 (8) IN MULTIPLE TENANT STRUCTURES AND COVERED MALL
 STRUCTURES WITH MULTIPLE MAIN ENTRY DOORS, THE
 AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION IS AUTHORIZED TO REQUIRE
 THAT OTHER MAIN ENTRY DOORS OF THE STRUCTURE BE MARKED
 WITH AN APPROVED SYMBOL TO CARRY OUT THE PURPOSE IN
 SUBSECTION (1) ABOVE.
 (9) IN MULTIPLE TENANT STRUCTURES AND COVERED MALLS
 WITH MULTIPLE MAIN ENTRY DOORS, THE AUTHORITY HAVING
 JURISDICTION IS AUTHORIZED TO REQUIRE THAT OTHER MAIN
 ENTRY DOORS BE MARKED WITH AN APPROVED SYMBOL TO CARRY
 OUT THE PURPOSE IN SUBSECTION (1) ABOVE. IN SUCH
 STRUCTURES, APPROVED SYMBOLS SHALL BE MARKED ON ONE
 SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE ONLY AND SPACED NOT CLOSER THAN
 100 FEET OR AT EACH END OF THE STRUCTURE WHEN SUCH
 STRUCTURE IS LESS THAN 100 FEET IN LENGTH.
 (10) THE OWNER OF EACH NEW STRUCTURE REQUIRED TO COMPLY
 WITH THIS SECTION SHALL MARK THE STRUCTURE WITH THE
 APPROVED SYMBOL PRIOR TO RECEIVING A CERTIFICATE OF
 OCCUPANCY.
 (11) THE OWNER OF EACH EXISTING STRUCTURE REQUIRED TO
 COMPLY WITH THIS SECTION SHALL MARK THE STRUCTURE WITH
 THE APPROVED SYMBOL WITHIN 90 DAYS OF THE EFFECTIVE
 DATE OF THIS RULE.
 (12) WHERE THE OWNER OF THE STRUCTURE AND THE AUTHORITY
 HAVING JURISDICTION DISAGREE AS TO THE USE OF
 LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS-TYPE CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE
 STRUCTURE, THE OWNER SHALL BE GRANTED NOT MORE THAN 45
 DAYS TO PROVIDE WRITTEN VERIFICATION FROM A LICENSED
 ENGINEER OR LICENSED ARCHITECT; OTHERWISE, THE OWNER
 SHALL COMPLY WITH THE RULE.
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED SIGNAGE.
  
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2017-08-28 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 2017-08-28 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 2017-08-25 Time 11:29 Sent To  
Notes
2017-08-25 14:06:392ND REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE
 MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
  
  
 1) IT IS UNCLEAR WHAT THE SCOPE OF WORK IS FOR THE
 SUBMITTED PERMIT, FOUNDATION, SHELL OR ENTIRE BUILDING?
  
 COMPLIED; FULL LIFE SAFETY REVIEW, ENTIRE
 BUILDING/SITE.
  
  
 2) SHEET A 0.01 - THERE ARE INCORRECT REFERNCES TO THE
 CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FIRE CODE INDICATED.
  
 NOT COMPLIED: THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE
 PREVENTION CODE IS 2014, AS NOTED IN MY COMMENTS
 PREVIOUSLY; 2015 WAS INSERTED AND IS INCORRECT.
  
 THE PROPOSED PROJECT SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
 5TH EDITION OF FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE INCLUDING
 THE 2012 EDITION OF NFPA 1 AND NFPA 101 AND ALL OTHER
 APPLICABLE CODES OR STANDARDS.
  
 FIRE SPRINKLER WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS
 OF NFPA 13, 2010 EDITION.
 FIRE ALARM WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF
 NFPA 72, 2010 EDITION.
 CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF
 NFPA 241, 2009 EDITION.
 FIRE EXTINGUISHERS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS
 OF NFPA 10, 2010 EDITION.
 ELECTRIC WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 70, 2011 EDITION.
 EMERGENCY AND STANDBY POWER SYSTEMS SHALL COMPLY WITH
 NFPA 110, 2013 EDITION.
  
 PLEASE CORRECT.
  
  
  
 3) SHEET A 0.02 - THE GYM ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY
 CALCULATION IS INDICATED 15/PERSON/SQ FT. OR 400. THERE
 IS NO SEATING PLAN INDICATED AND 15 CAN NOT BE USED,
 7/PERSON/SQ FT SHALL BE USED. THIS RENDERS ALL YOUR
 EGRESS CALCULATION INACCURATE.
  
 NOT COMPLIED. THIS AREA IS MORE THAN AN EXERCISE ROOM
  
 PER NFPA 101, CHAPTER 12, ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCIES AND
 CHAPTER 7 MEANS OF EGRESS.
  
 TABLE 7.3.1.2 OCCUPANCT LOAD FACTOR, CONCENTRATED USE,
 WITHOUT FIXED SEATING 7 NET IS TO BE USED.
  
 PLEASE REVIEW AND CORRECT.
  
  
  
 4) SHEET A 0.02 - NOTE # 7 INDICATES AN INCORRECT
 REFERENCE TO NFPA 13.
  
 NOT COMPLIED: THE CURRENT EDITION OF NFPA 13, AS NOTED
 IN MY COMMENTS IS 2010; 2016 WAS INSERTED AND IS
 INCORRECT.
  
 PLEASE CORRECT IT TO 2010 AS NOTED ABOVE.
  
  
  
 5) SHEET A 0.02 - NOTE # 9 INDICATES THAT THE GYM
 OCCUPANCY LOAD BE REDUCED AS A REFLECTION OF THE SCHOOL
 OCCUPANCY. THE CODE IS WRITTEN FOR THE POTENTIAL USE OF
 THE SPACE, NOT JUST THE OCCUPANCY OF THE SCHOOL. THERE
 MAY BE SPECIAL EVENTS OR OTHER ACTIVITES THAT MAY
 SUBJECT THE SPACE TO THE HIGHEST POTENTIAL OCCUPANCY
 LOAD.
  
 NOT COMPLIED.
  
 NFPA 101, CHAPTER & MEANS OF EGRESS.
  
 7.3.1.2* OCCUPANT LOAD FACTOR. THE OCCUPANT LOAD IN ANY
 BUILDING OR PORTION THEREOF SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN THE
 NUMBER OF PERSONS DETERMINED BY DIVIDING THE FLOOR AREA
 ASSIGNED TO THAT USE BY THE OCCUPANT LOAD FACTOR FOR
 THAT USE AS SPECIFIED IN TABLE 7.3.1.2, FIGURE
 7.3.1.2(A), AND FIGURE 7.3.1.2(B). WHERE BOTH GROSS AND
 NET AREA FIGURES ARE GIVEN FOR THE SAME OCCUPANCY,
 CALCULATIONS SHALL BE MADE BY APPLYING THE GROSS AREA
 FIGURE TO THE GROSS AREA OF THE PORTION OF THE BUILDING
 DEVOTED TO THE USE FOR WHICH THE GROSS AREA FIGURE IS
 SPECIFIED AND BY APPLYING THE NET AREA FIGURE TO THE
 NET AREA OF THE PORTION OF THE BUILDING DEVOTED TO THE
 USE FOR WHICH THE NET AREA FIGURE IS SPECIFIED.
  
  
 PLEASE REVIEW, CORRECT OR REMOVE THE COMMENT.
  
  
  
 6) SHEET A 2.01 - THERE ARE LIGHWIEGHT TRUSS DESIGNED
 FOR THIS PROJECT.
  
 NOT COMPLIED; A LIGHTWEIGHT TRUSS SIGN IS REQUIRED.
 PLEASE PROVIDE AN APPLICABLE NOTE OF COMPLIANCE.
  
 PER FLORIDA 69A-60.0081; NOTICE SIGNAGE IS REQUIRED FOR
 STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS-TYPE CONSTRUCTION.
 ANY COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, OR ANY MULTIUNIT
 RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE OF THREE UNITS OR MORE WHICH USES
 HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS-TYPE
 CONSTRUCTION IN ANY PORTION SHALL BE MARKED WITH A
 MALTESE CROSS SIGN MEASURING 8 INCHES HORIZONTALLY AND
 8 INCHES VERTICALLY, OF A BRIGHT RED REFLECTIVE COLOR.
 THE APPROVED SYMBOL SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN 24 INCHES TO
 THE LEFT OF THE MAIN ENTRY DOOR.
 1. STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS ROOFS SHALL BE
 MARKED WITH THE LETTER "R".
 2. STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS FLOOR SYSTEMS
 SHALL BE MARKED WITH THE LETTER "F".
 3. STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS FLOOR AND ROOF
 SYSTEMS SHALL BE MARKED WITH THE LETTERS "R/F".
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE FOR THE APPLICABLE SIGNAGE.
  
  
  
  
 7) SHEET A 1.00 - NOTE # 1 INDICATES "DEMOLISH EXISTING
 ALUMINUM STAIR AND STRUCTURE".
  
 NOT COMPLIED. NO REVISION SHEET FOUND, NO REVISION
 DRAWINGS FOUND ON ANY SHEET.
  
 THE EXISTING STAIR AND STRUCTURE IS A REQUIRED EXIT OF
 THE EXISTING SCHOOL.
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A LIFE SAFETY PLAN FOR THE EXISTING
 SCHOOL AND INDICATE IN DETAILS HOW THE EXITING OF THE
 EXISTING SCHOOL WILL BE MAINTAINED DURING ALL
 CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY UNTIL COMPLETION.
  
  
  
  
 8) SHEET 0.02 - IT IS NOT CLEAR THAT ALL EXITS LEAD TO
 A PUBLIC WAY.
  
 NOT COMPLIED. NO REVISION SHEET FOUND, NO REVISION
 DRAWINGS FOUND ON ANY SHEET.
  
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE AN ENTIRE SITE PLAN INDICATING PASSAGE
 TO A PUBLIC WAY OR AREA OF SAFETY.
  
  
  
 9) ALL SHEETS - IT APPEARS THAT MANY OF THE INTERIOR
 FLOOR PLANS WERE NOT INCLUDED, SO AN ACCURATE REVIEW OF
 THE ENTIRE PROPOSED SCHOOL BUILDING COULD NOT BE
 COMPLETED.
  
 COMPLIED
  
  
  
 10) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET
 REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE
 ABOVE.
  
  
  
 11) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE
 RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE.
  
  
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2017-05-03 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 2017-05-03 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 2017-05-02 Time 15:26 Sent To  
Notes
2017-05-03 12:31:34THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE
 MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
  
  
 1) IT IS UNCLEAR WHAT THE SCOPE OF WORK IS FOR THE
 SUBMITTED PERMIT, FOUNDATION, SHELL OR ENTIRE BUILDING?
  
 PLEASE CLARIFY.
  
 SOME OF THE COMMENTS MAY NOT APPLY TO A FOUNDATION AND
 SHELL PERMIT.
  
  
 2) SHEET A 0.01 - THERE ARE INCORRECT REFERNCES TO THE
 CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FIRE CODE INDICATED.
  
 THE PROPOSED PROJECT SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
 5TH EDITION OF FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE INCLUDING
 THE 2012 EDITION OF NFPA 1 AND NFPA 101 AND ALL OTHER
 APPLICABLE CODES OR STANDARDS.
  
 FIRE SPRINKLER WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS
 OF NFPA 13, 2010 EDITION.
 FIRE ALARM WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF
 NFPA 72, 2010 EDITION.
 CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF
 NFPA 241, 2009 EDITION.
 FIRE EXTINGUISHERS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS
 OF NFPA 10, 2010 EDITION.
 ELECTRIC WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 70, 2011 EDITION.
 EMERGENCY AND STANDBY POWER SYSTEMS SHALL COMPLY WITH
 NFPA 110, 2013 EDITION.
  
 PLEASE CORRECT.
  
  
  
 3) SHEET A 0.02 - THE GYM ASSEMBLE OCCUPANCY
 CALCULATION IS INDICATED 15/PERSON/SQ FT. OR 400. THERE
 IS NO SEATING PLAN INDICATED AND 15 CAN NOT BE USED,
 7/PERSON/SQ FT SHALL BE USED. THIS RENDERS ALL YOUR
 EGRESS CLAUCULATION INACCURATE.
  
 PER NFPA 101, CHAPTER 12, ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCIES AND
 CHAPTER 7 MEANS OF EGRESS.
  
 TABLE 7.3.1.2 OCCUPANCT LOAD FACTOR, CONCENTRATED USE,
 WITHOUT FIXED SEATING 7 NET IS TO BE USED.
  
 PLEASE REVIEW AND CORRECT.
  
  
  
 4) SHEET A 0.02 - NOTE # 7 INDICATES AN INCORRECT
 REFERENCE TO NFPA 13.
  
 PLEASE CORRECT IT TO 2010 AS NOTED ABOVE.
  
  
  
 5) SHEET A 0.02 - NOTE # 9 INDICATES THAT THE GYM
 OCCUPANCY LOAD BE REDUCED AS A REFLECTION OF THE SCHOOL
 OCCUPANCY. THE CODE IS WRITTEN FOR THE POTENTIAL USE OF
 THE SPACE, NOT JUST THE OCCUPANCY OF THE SCHOOL. THERE
 MAY BE SPECIAL EVENTS OR OTHER ACTIVITES THAT MAY
 SUBJECT THE SPACE TO THE HIGHEST POTENTIAL OCCUPANCY
 LOAD.
  
 NFPA 101, CHPATER & MEANS OF EGRESS.
  
 7.3.1.2* OCCUPANT LOAD FACTOR. THE OCCUPANT LOAD IN ANY
 BUILDING OR PORTION THEREOF SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN THE
 NUMBER OF PERSONS DETERMINED BY DIVIDING THE FLOOR AREA
 ASSIGNED TO THAT USE BY THE OCCUPANT LOAD FACTOR FOR
 THAT USE AS SPECIFIED IN TABLE 7.3.1.2, FIGURE
 7.3.1.2(A), AND FIGURE 7.3.1.2(B). WHERE BOTH GROSS AND
 NET AREA FIGURES ARE GIVEN FOR THE SAME OCCUPANCY,
 CALCULATIONS SHALL BE MADE BY APPLYING THE GROSS AREA
 FIGURE TO THE GROSS AREA OF THE PORTION OF THE BUILDING
 DEVOTED TO THE USE FOR WHICH THE GROSS AREA FIGURE IS
 SPECIFIED AND BY APPLYING THE NET AREA FIGURE TO THE
 NET AREA OF THE PORTION OF THE BUILDING DEVOTED TO THE
 USE FOR WHICH THE NET AREA FIGURE IS SPECIFIED.
  
  
 PLEASE REVIEW, CORRECT OR REMOVE THE COMMENT.
  
  
  
 6) SHEET A 2.01 - THERE ARE LIGHWIEGHT TRUSS DESIGNED
 FOR THIS PROJECT.
  
 PER FLORIDA 69A-60.0081; NOTICE SIGNAGE IS REQUIRED FOR
 STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS-TYPE CONSTRUCTION.
 ANY COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, OR ANY MULTIUNIT
 RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE OF THREE UNITS OR MORE WHICH USES
 HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS-TYPE
 CONSTRUCTION IN ANY PORTION SHALL BE MARKED WITH A
 MALTESE CROSS SIGN MEASURING 8 INCHES HORIZONTALLY AND
 8 INCHES VERTICALLY, OF A BRIGHT RED REFLECTIVE COLOR.
 THE APPROVED SYMBOL SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN 24 INCHES TO
 THE LEFT OF THE MAIN ENTRY DOOR.
 1. STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS ROOFS SHALL BE
 MARKED WITH THE LETTER "R".
 2. STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS FLOOR SYSTEMS
 SHALL BE MARKED WITH THE LETTER "F".
 3. STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS FLOOR AND ROOF
 SYSTEMS SHALL BE MARKED WITH THE LETTERS "R/F".
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE FOR THE APPLICABLE SIGNAGE.
  
  
  
 7) SHEET A 1.00 - NOTE # 1 INDICATES "DEMOLISH EXISTING
 ALUMINUM STAIR AND STRUCTURE".
  
 THE EXISTING STAIR AND STRUCTURE IS A REQUIRED EXIT OF
 THE EXISTING SCHOOL.
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A LIFE SAFETY PLAN FOR THE EXISTING
 SCHOOL AND INDICATE IN DETAILS HOW THE EXITING OF THE
 EXISTING SCHOOL WILL BE MAINTAINED DURING ALL
 CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY UNTIL COMPLETION.
  
  
  
  
 8) SHEET 0.02 - IT IS NOT CLEAR THAT ALL EXITS LEAD TO
 A PUBLIC WAY.
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE AN ENTIRE SITE PLAN INDICATING PASSAGE
 TO A PUBLIC WAY OR AREA OF SAFETY.
  
  
  
 9) ALL SHEETS - IT APPEARS THAT MANY OF THE INTERIOR
 FLOOR PLANS WERE NOT INCLUDED, SO AN ACCURATE REVIEW OF
 THE ENTIRE PROPOSED SCHOOL BUILDING COULD NOT BE
 COMPLETED.
  
 PLEASE REVIEW AND SEE # 1 ABOVE AND PROVIDE CLEAR SCOPE
 OF WORK.
  
  
  
 10) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET
 REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE
 ABOVE.
  
  
  
 11) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE
 RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE.
  
  
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
  
  
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 5 Status N Date 2018-03-22 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2018-03-22 Time 11:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2018-03-15 Time 14:20 Sent To  
Notes
2018-03-16 14:20:54RESUB ROUTED TO CCOLE
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2018-03-15 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2018-03-15 Time 15:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2018-02-28 Time 16:39 Sent To  
Notes
2018-02-28 16:39:29C37
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2018-02-28 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2018-02-28 Time 06:50 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2018-01-26 Time 15:49 Sent To  
Notes
2018-01-29 15:49:28C37
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2017-09-26 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-09-26 Time 16:47 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-08-21 Time 15:43 Sent To  
Notes
2017-08-23 15:44:04C37
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2017-05-11 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-05-03 Time 08:05 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-04-18 Time 13:24 Sent To  
Notes
2017-05-11 08:06:22TOOK OFF BOARD (CUSTOMER AWARE; CHECKED OUT ONE SET OF
 PLANS ON 5/3)
2017-04-19 13:31:10C19
Review Stop IMPACT COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2018-02-12 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2018-02-12 Time 08:13 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2018-02-12 Time 08:13 Sent To  
Notes
2018-02-12 08:13:52SEE IMPACT FEE UNDER REVISION 17100798:
 MU 2017-30025, $3,148.12
  
  
Review Stop IMPACT COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2017-04-27 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-04-27 Time 07:16 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-04-27 Time 07:16 Sent To  
Notes
2017-04-27 07:17:13IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT BY PALM BEACH COUNTY REQUIRED
 THE PLANS ARE TO BE STAMPED AND THE RECEIPT SHOWING
 THAT FEES HAVE BEEN PAID IS TO BE PROVIDED
  
 561-233-5025 FOR MORE INFORMATION
  
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 5 Status P Date 2018-03-19 Cont ID  
Sent By ccole Date 2018-03-19 Time 08:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ccole Date 2018-03-16 Time 17:09 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2018-03-12 Cont ID  
Sent By ccole Date 2018-03-12 Time 10:03 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ccole Date 2018-03-09 Time 16:35 Sent To  
Notes
2018-03-12 11:06:294TH REVIEW FBC-2014 MECHANICAL
 PERMIT #17040807
 3/12/18
  
 PLAN REVIEW RESULTS: DENIED.
  
 1) SHEET M2.1.1: AS PREVIOUSLY NOTED IN THE 3RD REVIEW,
 THE SHOP (FAB LAB) SHALL HAVE AN INDEPENDENT EXHAUST
 SYSTEM AND SHALL NOT BE CONNECTED TO THE TOILET ROOM
 EXHAUST DUCT.
  
 2) M2.1.1: RECIRCULATION OF AIR FROM THE FAB LAB IS
 LIMITED TO 10% PER FOOTNOTE G TABLE 403.3. THE PLAN
 DOES NOT CLEARLY SHOW IF AIR IS BEING RETURNED VIA THE
 30X16" DUCT- PLEASE CLARIFY.
  
 3) M2.2.1: FIRE DAMPERS ARE MISSING WHERE THE 28X16 AND
 22X12 DUCTS ARE PENETRATING THE FIRE-RATED SHAFT.
  
 CHRISTOPHER L. COLE
 MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER
 401 CLEMATIS STREET
 WEST PALM BEACH FL 33401
 561-805-6719
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2018-02-06 Cont ID  
Sent By ccole Date 2018-02-06 Time 12:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ccole Date 2018-02-06 Time 10:52 Sent To  
Notes
2018-02-06 13:17:193RD REVIEW FBC-2014 MECHANICAL, ENERGY CONSERVATION
 CODES
 PERMIT #17040807
 2/6/18
  
 PLAN REVIEW RESULTS: DENIED.
  
 1) THE SUBMITTED ENERGYGAUGE COMPLIANCE FORM, AND THE
 AC LOAD CALCULATIONS INDICATE AC SYSTEMS EXCEEDING 15
 TONS WHICH REQUIRES THE ENGINEER OF RECORD TO PROVIDE
 HIS SIGNATURE AND SEAL ON THE DOCUMENTS- SECTION
 C103.1.1.1.2 FLORIDA ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE.
  
 2) THE AIRSOCK DUCKWORK SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH CLASS
 0 OR CLASS 1 MATERIAL AND SHALL COMPLY WITH UL 181-
 SECTION 603.5. PLEASE PROVIDE A PRODUCT DATA SHEET WITH
 SHOP DRAWING APPROVAL STAMP BY THE EOR.
  
 3) ACCORDING TO THE RESPONSE NARRATIVE BY KAMM
 ENGINEERING THE FAB LAB IS ACTUALLY A METAL/WOOD SHOP.
 PLEASE SEE SECTIONS 510.2.1, 510.4, AND 511 AND PROVIDE
 AN INDEPENDENT EXHAUST SYSTEM FOR THE ROOM (NOT
 CONJLOINED WITH THE RESTROOM), AND A DUCT COLLECTION
 SYSTEM FOR THE SHOP EQUIPMENT.
  
 4) ACCORDING TO THE RESPONSE NARRATIVE BY KAMM
 ENGINEERING, THE WIND LOAD ENGINEERING IS BE PROVIDED
 BY OTHERS AS A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL:
  
 1) DEFERRED SUBMITTAL: 107.3.4.2 DEFERRED SUBMITTALS.
 FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, DEFERRED SUBMITTALS
 ARE DEFINED AS THOSE PORTIONS OF THE DESIGN THAT ARE
 NOT SUBMITTED AT THE TIME OF THE APPLICATION AND THAT
 ARE TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL WITHIN A
 SPECIFIED PERIOD. DEFERRAL OF ANY SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL
 HAVE THE PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. THE
 REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE
 SHALL LIST THE DEFERRED SUBMITTALS ON THE CONSTRUCTION
 DOCUMENTS FOR REVIEW BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL.
 DOCUMENTS FOR DEFERRED SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED TO THE REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN
 RESPONSIBLE CHARGE WHO SHALL REVIEW THEM AND FORWARD
 THEM TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL WITH A NOTATION
 INDICATING THAT THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS HAVE
 BEEN REVIEWED AND FOUND TO BE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE TO
 THE DESIGN OF THE BUILDING. THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL
 ITEMS SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED UNTIL THE DEFERRED
 SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE BUILDING
 OFFICIAL.
 2) DEFERRED SUBMITTAL. FBC 107.3.4.1 PRODUCT APPROVALS.
 THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY THE DCA RULE
 9N-03 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE
 DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR
 JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE
 LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY
 RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE INSERT
 CORRECTED PLAN SHEETS INTO THE SETS, REMOVE THE
 PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS AND MARK VOID ON THEM, AND
 KEEP THEM WITH THE SUBMITTALS.
  
 CHRISTOPHER L. COLE
 MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER
 401 CLEMATIS STREET
 WEST PALM BEACH FL 33401
 561-805-6719
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2017-09-06 Cont ID  
Sent By ccole Date 2017-09-06 Time 14:33 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ccole Date 2017-09-06 Time 14:33 Sent To  
Notes
2017-09-06 15:14:032ND REVIEW FBC-2014 MECHANICAL
 PERMIT #17040807
 9/6/17
  
 PLAN REVIEW RESULTS: DENIED.
  
 1) 2ND REQUEST FOR AC COOLING AND HEATING CALCULATIONS,
 AND ENERGY CALCULATIONS- PLEASE COMPLY.
  
 2) SHEETS M2.1.1 & M2.2.1: THE AC LAYOUT PLANS APPEAR
 INCOMPLETE. A) INDICATE WHAT TYPE AND SIZE OF LOW
 PRESSURE DUCTWORK IS TO BE INSTALLED AT THE OUTLETS OF
 THE VAV BOXES. B) LABEL THE DIFFUSER LOCATIONS IN THE
 LOW PRESSURE DUCTWORK AND INDICATE THE CFMS AT EACH.
  
 3) M2.1.1, M2.2.1, & M2.2.2: PROVIDE DUCT SMOKE
 DETECTORS IN THE RETURN AIR SYSTEMS OF THE NEW RTU'S-
 SECTION 606.2.1.
  
 4) M2.1.1 & M2.2.1: THE CORRIDORS CANNOT BE USED TO
 CONVEY RETURN AIR VIA THE TRANSFERS FROM THE CLASSROOMS
 AND OTHER ROOMS TO THE RTU'S- SECTION 601.2.
  
 5) M2.1.1 & M6.1: AN EXHAUST VENTILATION SYSTEM IS
 REQUIRED FOR THE LAB IN COMPLIANCE WITH TABLE 403.3
 FBC-14 MECHANICAL, AND TABLE 6-4 ASHRAE 62.1-2010. THE
 EXHAUST RATE IS CALCULATED AT A RATE OF 1.0 CFMS PER
 SQ. FT. REVISE THE PLANS AND CALCULATIONS TO SHOW THE
 REQUIRED SYSTEM, AND REVISE THE O/A TABLE TO INCLUDE
 THE FRESH AIR RATE FOR THE ROOM. PLEASE NOTE THAT
  
 RECIRCULATION OF AIR FROM THE SPACE IS PROHIBITED PER
 FOOTNOTE G.
  
 6) THE RTU EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE INDICATES THAT BOTH RTU-2
 & RTU-4 ARE EQUIPPED WITH ERV'S, HOWEVER NO EXHAUST
 SYSTEM IS CONNECTING TO RTU-4. PLEASE CLARIFY.
  
 7) M6.1: THE VENTILATION RATE FOR THE CLASSROOMS IS
 CALCULATED AT 0.12 CFMS PER SQ. FT. PLEASE CORRECT THE
 O/A SCHEDULE.
  
 8) PROVIDE COMPLETE STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND WIND
 DESIGN CRITERIA FOR INSTALLATION OF THE RTU'S- SECTION
 301.15.
  
 9) PROVIDE A CONDENSATE DISPOSAL PLAN FOR THE RTU'S-
 SECTION 307.
  
 CHRISTOPHER L. COLE
 MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER
 401 CLEMATIS STREET
 WEST PALM BEACH FL 33401
 561-805-6719
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2017-04-26 Cont ID  
Sent By ccole Date 2017-04-26 Time 08:18 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ccole Date 2017-04-26 Time 07:11 Sent To  
Notes
2017-04-26 08:22:011ST REVIEW FBC-2014 MECHANICAL
 PERMIT #17040807
 4/26/17
  
 1) PROVIDE COMPLETE SETS OF MECHANICAL PLANS,
 SPECIFICATIONS, AND AC AND ENERGY CALCULATIONS.
  
 CHRISTOPHER L. COLE
 MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER
 401 CLEMATIS STREET
 WEST PALM BEACH FL 33401
 561-805-6719
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2018-03-13 Cont ID  
Sent By gjohnson Date 2018-03-13 Time 08:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By gjohnson Date 2018-03-13 Time 08:17 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2018-02-12 Cont ID  
Sent By gjohnson Date 2018-02-12 Time 07:02 Rev Time 0.00
Received By gjohnson Date 2018-02-12 Time 07:02 Sent To  
Notes
2018-02-12 07:13:033RD REVIEW: FBC 2014 5TH EDITION
  
 PLUMBING COMMENTS: PREVIOUS COMMENTS NOT COMPLIED
  
 3RD REQUEST 2. PLEASE PROVIDE A FIXTURE COUNT
 BREAKDOWN. PER WPB AMEND TO FBC 107.3.5.1.3
  
 2ND REQUEST 1.THE CIRCUIT VENT CONNECTION SHALL BE
 LOCATED BETWEEN THE TWO MOST UPSTREAM WATER CLOSET
 DRAINS. THE VENT SHALL CONNECT TO THE HORIZONTAL BRANCH
 AND SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 905.
 THE CIRCUIT VENT PIPE SHALL NOT RECEIVE THE DISCHARGE
 OF ANY SOIL OR WASTE. PER FBC PL 914.2
  
 2ND REQUEST 4. CIVIL SHT. #7 OF 8 SHOWS A GAS MAIN
 RUNNING UNDER PROPOSED BUILDING GAS LINES SHALL NOT RUN
 UNDER BUILDING WILL NEED TO BE RELOCATED.PER FBC FG
 404.14
  
 2ND REQUEST 5. THE CIVIL SHT #7 OF 8 THE CONFIGURATION
 OF GREASE INTERCEPTOR DOES NOT MATCH EXISTING
 INSTALLATION UNDER PERMIT 16041215. PLEASE CLARIFY. PER
 WPB AMEND TO FBC 107.2.1
  
 2ND REQUEST 6. PROVIDE DETAILS FOR ACCESSIBILITY IN
 BATHROOMS, DRINKING FOUNTAIN AND CLASSROOM SINKS. PER
 FBC ACC CHAPTER 6
  
 PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED
 MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS.
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE
 LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY
 RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. PLEASE, ADDITIONALLY, INSERT
 CORRECTED PAGES INTO TO SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE OR VOID
 THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS.
  
  
 GEORGE JOHNSON
 PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
  561-805-6711
 [email protected]
  
  
  
  
  
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2017-09-13 Cont ID  
Sent By gjohnson Date 2017-09-13 Time 13:45 Rev Time 0.00
Received By gjohnson Date 2017-09-13 Time 11:07 Sent To  
Notes
2017-09-13 13:51:171ST REVIEW: FBC 2014 5TH EDITION
  
 PLUMBING COMMENTS: PREVIOUS COMMENT NOT COMPLIED
  
 2. PLEASE PROVIDE A FIXTURE COUNT BREAKDOWN. PER WPB
 AMEND TO FBC 107.3.5.1.3
  
 NEW COMMENT:
  
 1.THE CIRCUIT VENT CONNECTION SHALL BE LOCATED BETWEEN
 THE TWO MOST UPSTREAM WATER CLOSET DRAINS. THE VENT
 SHALL CONNECT TO THE HORIZONTAL BRANCH AND SHALL BE
 INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 905. THE CIRCUIT
 VENT PIPE SHALL NOT RECEIVE THE DISCHARGE OF ANY SOIL
 OR WASTE. PER FBC PL 914.2
  
 2. PLEASE PROVIDE SQFT DRAINED BY ROOF DRAINS. PER WPB
 AMEND TO FBC 107.2.1
  
 3. PLEASE EXPAND SANITARY RISER IT IS DIFFICULT TO READ
 AND WHEN IT IS SCANNED IN FOR OUR RECORDS IT WILL BE
 EVEN HARDER TO READ. WPB AMEND TO FBC 107.2.1.4
  
 4. CIVIL SHT. #7 OF 8 SHOWS A GAS MAIN RUNNING UNDER
 PROPOSED BUILDING GAS LINES SHALL NOT RUN UNDER
 BUILDING WILL NEED TO BE RELOCATED.PER FBC FG 404.14
  
 5. THE CIVIL SHT #7 OF 8 THE CONFIGURATION OF GREASE
 INTERCEPTOR DOES NOT MATCH EXISTING INSTALLATION UNDER
 PERMIT 16041215. PLEASE CLARIFY. PER WPB AMEND TO FBC
 107.2.1
  
 6. PROVIDE DETAILS FOR ACCESSIBILITY IN BATHROOMS,
 DRINKING FOUNTAIN AND CLASSROOM SINKS. PER FBC ACC
 CHAPTER 6
  
 PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED
 MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS.
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE
 LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY
 RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. PLEASE, ADDITIONALLY, INSERT
 CORRECTED PAGES INTO TO SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE OR VOID
 THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2017-05-02 Cont ID  
Sent By gjohnson Date 2017-05-02 Time 09:08 Rev Time 0.00
Received By gjohnson Date 2017-05-01 Time 15:31 Sent To  
Notes
2017-05-02 09:09:511ST REVIEW
  
 GEORGE JOHNSON
 PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER LL
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
 BUILDING DIVISION
 561-805-6711
 [email protected]
  
 PLUMBING COMMENTS:
  
 1. PLEASE PROVIDE FULL SET OF PLUMBING DRAWINGS. PER
 WPB AMEND TO FBC 107.3.5.1.3
  
 2. PLEASE PROVIDE A FIXTURE COUNT BREAKDOWN. PER WPB
 AMEND TO FBC 107.3.5.1.3
  
  
 PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED
 MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS, REMOVE AND REPLACE ANY PAGES
 AS NECESSARY. A NARRATIVE LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW
 COMMENT NUMBER WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE CHANGES MADE
 AND IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE
 THE CHANGE CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP EXPEDITE THE REVIEW.
  
Review Stop R ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2017-09-22 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-09-22 Time 08:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-09-22 Time 08:46 Sent To  
Notes
2017-09-22 09:05:33PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, ROOF PRODUCT APPROVALS, REVIEWED
 BY DESIGNER OF RECORD, TO BE SUBMITTED WITH ENGINEERING
 FOR ENHANCED FASTENING, IF APPLICABLE.
  
  
Review Stop THRESHOLD THRESHOLD INSPECTOR DOCUMENTS
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2017-09-20 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-09-20 Time 09:56 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-09-19 Time 15:11 Sent To  
Notes
2017-09-19 15:12:44SPECIAL INSPECTOR AGREEMENT, PORTIONS APPROVED:
 TIERRA SOUTH FLORIDA
 FRANCOIS THOMAS, PE 56381, SI 7021399
 PEDRO ROSA, BN3764
 ANDREW MORGAN, PE 57171 (SEOR)
  
 ***PROVISO***
 A RESUME WAS SUBMITTED FOR ENRIQUE BURBANO BUT HE HAS
 NOT SIGNED THE AGREEMENT AS OF 9/19/17. PROVIDE SI
 AGREEMENT PAGE 3 OF 4, SIGNED BY FRANCOIS THOMAS, PE,SI
 AND ENRIQUE BURBANO, BN4650
  
 ORIGINALS SENT TO RECORDS ON 9/20/17 UNDER PERMIT
 NUMBERS 17040807, 17060234
Review Stop THRESHOLD THRESHOLD INSPECTOR DOCUMENTS
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2017-04-27 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-04-27 Time 07:31 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-04-27 Time 07:31 Sent To  
Notes
2017-04-27 07:31:45****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014)
 FBC B = FBC BUILDING
 FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING
 FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY
 FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION
  
 THRESHOLD BUILDING / FL S. S. 553.71(7) "THRESHOLD
 BUILDING" MEANING ANY BUILDING WHICH IS GREATER THAN
 (3) STORIES OR 50 FT. IN HEIGHT, OR WHICH HAS AN
 ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION AS DEFINED IN THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE WHICH EXCEEDS 5,000 SQ. FT. IN
 AREA AND AN OCCUPANT CONTENT OF GREATER THAN 500
 PERSONS.
  
 SEE PAGES A0.02, A0.03 - 8,932 ASSEMBLY (A3 & A5),
 OCCUPANT LOAD 538.
  
 A) 109.3.6.1 THRESHOLD INSPECTION PLAN. THE ENFORCING
 AGENCY SHALL REQUIRE A (WRITTEN/ TYPED) SPECIAL
 INSPECTOR TO PERFORM STRUCTURAL INSPECTIONS ON A
 THRESHOLD BUILDING PURSUANT TO A STRUCTURAL INSPECTION
 PLAN PREPARED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. THE STRUCTURAL
 INSPECTION PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE ENFORCING
 AGENCY PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR
 THE CONSTRUCTION OF A THRESHOLD BUILDING. THE PURPOSE
 OF THE STRUCTURAL INSPECTION PLAN IS TO PROVIDE
 SPECIFIC INSPECTION PROCEDURES AND SCHEDULES SO THAT
 THE BUILDING CAN BE ADEQUATELY INSPECTED FOR COMPLIANCE
 WITH THE PERMITTED DOCUMENTS.
  
 B) THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: WPB AMENDMENT 109.3.6.2 W.P.B.
 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR THRESHOLD
 BUILDINGS A SPECIAL INSPECTOR AS REQUIRED BY FL S S
 553.79(5) FLORIDA STATUTES TO THE MINIMUM INSPECTIONS
 REQUIRED BY THIS CODE. THE THRESHOLD INSPECTION FORMS
 ARE REQUIRED TO BE FILED OUT BY ALL PARTIES WITH
 INTEREST, NOTARIZED AND RETURNED TO THIS OFFICE, AND
 REVIEWED AND APPROVED BEFORE PERMIT ISSUANCE WILL TAKE
 PLACE. CONTACT KEN CONRAD MANAGER OF THE SPECIAL
 INSPECTOR PROGRAM AT (561)805-6666 FOR FURTHER
 INFORMATION BEFORE THE PERMIT MAY BE ISSUED.
  
 C) THRESHOLD BLDG., REQUIRED STATEMENT W.P.B. AMENDMENT
 110.3.7.4.4, FS553.79(7)(D): ALL PLANS FOR THE BUILDING
 WHICH ARE REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE
 ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF RECORD CONTAIN A STATEMENT
 THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE ARCHITECT?S OR ENGINEER?S
 KNOWLEDGE, THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE
 APPLICABLE MINIMUM BUILDING CODES AND THE APPLICABLE
 FIRESAFETY STANDARDS AS DETERMINED BY THE LOCAL
 AUTHORITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS CHAPTER AND CHAPTER
 633.
  
 W.P.B. AMENDMENT 110.3.7.4.4 ALL PLANS FOR THE BUILDING
 WHICH ARE REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE
 ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF RECORD CONTAIN A STATEMENT
 THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE ARCHITECT'S OR ENGINEER'S
 KNOWLEDGE, THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE
 APPLICABLE FIRE-SAFETY STANDARDS AS DETERMINED BY THE
 LOCAL AUTHORITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION AND 633
 FLORIDA STATUTE.
  
 D) FOR THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR PLEASE PROVIDE A RESUME'
 OF INSPECTION EXPERIENCE ON PREVIOUS PROJECT. THE
 RESUME' MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY ALL CERTIFICATES AS
 SPECIFIED HEREIN. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OR HIS DESIGNEE
 WILL REVIEW THE RESUME'. AFTER THE RESUME' IS REVIEWED,
 AN INTERVIEW WILL BE SCHEDULED. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES
 WILL AN INSPECTOR BE INTERVIEWED FOR WORK WITHOUT FIRST
 MEETING THE ABOVE CRITERIA.
  
 E) THE CONTRACTOR WILL PRODUCE A JOB SUMMARY OR HISTORY
 FOR THIS TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION.
  
 F) NOTE FOR PAPER PLANS 3 SETS OF DOCUMENTS ARE
 REQUIRED. FOR DIGITAL PLANS, AFTER PERMIT ISSUANCE,
 PLEASE E-MAIL THE PERMIT LIBRARIAN OF THE PERMIT BEING
 ISSUED, THE PERMIT LIBRARIAN WILL THEN E-MAIL YOU THE
 APPROVED AND BATCH STAMPED PLANS SO YOU MAY PRINT YOUR
 PLANS, TWO SETS OF PLANS WILL NEED TO BE PRINTED IN
 COLOR, (1) FOR THE THRESHOLD INSPECTOR, THE OTHER FOR
 THE MEP INSPECTORS OTHER PLANS YOU WISH TO PRINT MAYBE
 IN BLACK & WHITE.
  
 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING
 CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 110.3.7 THRESHOLD
 BUILDINGS, GUIDELINES AND POLICIES FOR PROJECTS
 CONCERNING SPECIAL INSPECTORS.
  
 G) 110.3.7.4.3 ALL SHORING AND RESHORING PROCEDURES,
 PLANS AND DETAILS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ENFORCEMENT
 AGENCY FOR RECORDKEEPING. EACH SHORING AND RESHORING
 INSTALLATION SHALL BE SUPERVISED, INSPECTED AND
 CERTIFIED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE SHORING
 DOCUMENTS BY THE CONTRACTOR.
  
 H) PLEASE CALL THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH?S AUTOMATED
 TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS LINE (561) 805-6700) FOR ALL
 BUILDING INSPECTIONS FOR AUDITING OF JOBSITE
 INSPECTIONS WITHOUT THIS THE PERMIT EXPIRES IN 6
 MONTHS, ABANDONMENT OF JOB, NO INSPECTION ACTIVITY.
  
 I) 109.3.6 THRESHOLD BUILDINGS, OPERATING GUIDELINES
 FOR THRESHOLD INSPECTORS #26. ASSURE THAT THE DESIGNER
 HAS REQUIRED ON THE PLANS OR SPECIFICATIONS ONE
 MATERIAL, APPROVED FOR FIRE STOPPING PENETRATIONS, FOR
 WALLS AND CEILINGS.
  
 SI AGREEMENT AND POLICY SENT VIA EMAIL TO
 [email protected] ON 4/27/17.
  
 A RESIDENT INSPECTOR AGREEMENT WAS SUBMITTED. THIS DOES
 NOT MEET THE STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS OF FS 553.79.
  
 ANDREW MORGAN, PE SIGNED THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR
 AGEEMENT; THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR AGREEMENT IS REQUIRED
 AND THE ENGINEER'S SIGNATURE AND SEAL IS REQUIRED,
 FAC61G15-35.004.
  
 RICHARD AHRENS SIGNED AS GENERAL CONTRACTOR BUT THE
 NOTARARIAL CERTIFICATE HAS ANDREW MORGAN'S NAME AS
 SIGNING.
  
 NONE OF THE NOTARIAL CERTIFICATES INDICATE WHETHER ID
 WAS PRODUCED OR IF THE PERSON IS PERSONALLY KNOWN TO
 THE NOTARY.
  
 UNKNOWN PERSON SIGNED AS OWNER. THE NOTARARIAL
 CERTIFICATE DOES NOT INCLUDE A NAME.
  
 THE AFFIDAVIT CERTIFICATE OF CODE COMPLIANCE IS SIGNED
 BY THE CONTRACTOR AND ENGINEER, BUT THE CONSTRUCTION
 HAS NOT YET TAKEN PLACE. THIS DOCUMENT CERTIFIES THAT
 THE CONTRACTOR INSTALLED AND ENGINEER INSPECTED IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND
 CODES.
  
 WILL ANDREW MORGAN, PE BE THE ONLY INDIVIDUAL
 PERFORMING INSPECTIONS? A BACKUP INSPECTOR IS
 RECOMMENDED IN THE EVENT THAT MR. MORGAN IS
 UNAVAILABLE. ONLY INDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE SIGNED THE
 AGREEMENT AND HAVE BEEN APPROVED IN ADVANCE CAN PERFORM
 INSPECTIONS ON BEHALF OF THE SI.
  
 FS 553.79(5)(A) AND (C) I WAS UNABLE TO FIND THE
 SPECIAL INSPECTOR CERTIFICATION FOR ANDREW MORGAN, PE.
 PROVIDE.
  
  
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2018-02-28 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 2018-02-28 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 2018-02-28 Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2018-02-27 Cont ID  
Sent By LL Date 2018-02-27 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 2018-02-27 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-02-27 16:57:27** FAILED **
  
 PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS. RESPOND TO THE
 COMMENTS IN WRITING AND/OR ON THE PLANS WHERE
 APPLICABLE:
  
 1.) SITE PLAN WITH DIMENSIONS MISSING FROM PERMIT
 PACKAGE. PLEASE INCLUDE.
  
 2.) NEW ELEVATION DRAWINGS INCOMPLETE. PLEASE ADDRESS.
  
 NOTES:
  
 * REVISION MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE
 QUESTIONS.
  
 * ZONE: GC
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2017-09-19 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 2017-09-19 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 2017-09-19 Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2017-04-25 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 2017-04-25 Time   Rev Time  
Received By llouie Date 2017-04-25 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2017-04-25 11:37:58** FAILED **
  
 PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS. RESPOND TO THE
 COMMENTS IN WRITING AND/OR ON THE PLANS WHERE
 APPLICABLE:
  
 1.) ZONING APPROVAL IS SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF ISPR
 16-01B. ISPR 16-01B IS CURRENTLY PENDING WITH THE
 PLANNING DIVISION (STAFF WAITING ON A RESUBMITTAL BY
 THE APPLICANT).
  
  
 NOTES:
  
 * PLEASE NOTE THAT THE BUILDING PERMIT PLANS WILL NEED
 TO MATCHED THE PLANS PROVIDED IN APPLICATION ISPR
 16-01B ONCE APPROVED BY THE PLANNING DIVISION.
  
 * ANY REVISION MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE
 QUESTIONS.
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved