| Plan Review Stops For Permit 17030466 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2017-07-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2017-07-20 |
Time |
14:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2017-07-20 |
Time |
14:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2017-05-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2017-05-04 |
Time |
10:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2017-05-04 |
Time |
10:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-05-04 10:50:52 | 1) THE ICC LEGACY REPORT THAT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED IS | | | UNACCEPTABLE. THE REPORT IS BASED ON THE 1997 UBC WHICH | | | IS NOT RECCOGNIZED BY THE FBC AS A REFERENCED STANDARD. | | | NOTE: THE SUBMITTED UL ASSEMBLY DESIGN IS ACCEPTABLE AS | | | IT IS FOR A 2 HOUR ASSEMBLY IF THAT IS THE INTENT. | | | 2) THE HORIZONTAL SHAFT ENCAPSULATING THE DRAIN LINES | | | SHALLL BE 2 HOUR RATED. DRAWINGS 13A-A & 13A-B SHOW THE | | | SHAFT AS 1 HOUR RATED. CLARIFY. | | | 3) THE SUBMITTED NARRATIVE STATES THAT SHAFT ENCLOSURES | | | CONNECTING LESS THAN 4 STORIES REQUIRE A 1 HOUR RATING | | | WHICH IS CORRECT BUT THIS STRUCTURE IS 8 STORIES. | | | PLEASE CLARIFY THIS RESPONSE. | | | 4) THE NARRATIVE ALSO REFERS TO FBC SEC. 406.3.5 FOR | | | ALLOWING A 1 HOUR ROOF RATING. THIS SECTION IS FOR AREA | | | & HEIGHT IN THE 2010 FBC AND DOES NOT REFER TO ANY | | | HOURLY RATING. CLARIFY. | | | 5) THE NARRATIVE ALSO REFERS TO SEC. 713.4.2.1 OF THE | | | FBC - THIS SECTION IN THE 2010 FBC REFERS TO | | | NONCOMBUSTIBLE PENETRATING ITEMS THAT CONNECT NOT MORE | | | THAN THREE STORIES ARE PERMITTED. THIS SECTION APPLIES | | | TO NONFIRE - RESISTANCE RATED ASSEMBLIES. CLARIFY HOW | | | THIS APPLIES TO THIS ISSUE WHEN THE STAIR ENCLOSURE IS | | | A 2 HOUR RATED ENCLOSURE. | | | 6) THE NARRATIVE ALSO REFERS TO FBC SEC.708.4 WHICH | | | REFERS TO THE FIRE RATING OF SHAFT ENCLOSURES. THIS | | | STRUCTURE IS 8 STORIES AND REQUIRES A 2 HOUR RATING FOR | | | THE THE HORIZONTAL SHAFT ENCLOSURE. | | | AT THIS POINT DUE TO THE DISCRPANCIES IN THE SUBMITTED | | | DOCUMENTS I HAVE NO IDEA IF YOUR DESIGN IS GOING TO BE | | | 2 HOUR RATED OR IF YOU ARE STILL ATTEMPTING TO GET A 1 | | | HOUR RATING APPROVED WHICH DOES NOT MEET CODE. | | | | | | TIM LARGE | | | CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6692 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2017-03-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2017-03-14 |
Time |
12:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2017-03-14 |
Time |
12:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-03-14 12:17:18 | 1) INDICATE THE REQUIRED FIRE RATING OF THE STAIRWAY ON | | | THE DRAWINGS.FROM THE ORIGINAL DRAWINGS THIS IS A 2 | | | HOUR RATED STAIRWAY. | | | 2) INDICATE THE FIRE RATING OF THE ENCLOSURE FOR THE | | | PIPING ON THE DRAWINGS. THE DRAWINGS NOTE 2 LAYERS OF | | | 5/8 INCH TYPE X DRYWALL ON METAL STUD FRAMING WHICH | | | WOULD PROVIDE AN 80 MINUTE FIRE RATING WHICH IS LESS | | | THAN THE 2 HOUR RATING OF THE ENCLOSURE.THIS PIPING | | | ENCLOSURE SHALL BE THE SAME RATING AS THE ENCLOSURE IN | | | WHICH IT IS LOCATED.FBC 713..4, 713.5. | | | 3) INDICATE THE GAUGE OF THE METAL STUDS BEING USED. | | | | | | TIM LARGE | | | 561-805-6692 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2017-07-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleahy |
Date |
2017-07-18 |
Time |
17:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleahy |
Date |
2017-07-18 |
Time |
17:04 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2017-04-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vperez |
Date |
2017-04-19 |
Time |
10:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vperez |
Date |
2017-04-19 |
Time |
10:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2017-03-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vperez |
Date |
2017-03-13 |
Time |
14:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vperez |
Date |
2017-03-13 |
Time |
14:58 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2017-07-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2017-07-20 |
Time |
14:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2017-07-17 |
Time |
14:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-07-18 14:35:44 | RESUB ROUTED TO JLEAHY |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2017-05-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2017-05-04 |
Time |
10:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2017-04-17 |
Time |
12:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-04-18 12:51:47 | RESUB ROUTED TO VPEREZ |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2017-03-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2017-03-14 |
Time |
12:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2017-03-13 |
Time |
13:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-03-13 13:49:10 | VPEREZ'S DESK |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2017-07-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2017-07-20 |
Time |
14:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2017-07-20 |
Time |
14:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2017-05-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2017-05-04 |
Time |
10:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2017-05-04 |
Time |
06:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-05-04 08:56:25 | 1) THE ICC LEGACY REPORT THAT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED IS | | | UNACCEPTABLE. THE REPORT IS BASED ON THE 1997 UBC WHICH | | | IS NOT RECCOGNIZED BY THE FBC AS A REFERENCED STANDARD. | | | NOTE: THE SUBMITTED UL ASSEMBLY DESIGN IS ACCEPTABLE AS | | | IT IS FOR A 2 HOUR ASSEMBLY IF THAT IS THE INTENT. | | | 2) THE HORIZONTAL SHAFT ENCAPSULATING THE DRAIN LINES | | | SHALLL BE 2 HOUR RATED. DRAWINGS 13A-A & 13A-B SHOW THE | | | SHAFT AS 1 HOUR RATED. CLARIFY. | | | 3) THE SUBMITTED NARRATIVE STATES THAT SHAFT ENCLOSURES | | | CONNECTING LESS THAN 4 STORIES REQUIRE A 1 HOUR RATING | | | WHICH IS CORRECT BUT THIS STRUCTURE IS 8 STORIES. | | | PLEASE CLARIFY THIS RESPONSE. | | | 4) THE NARRATIVE ALSO REFERS TO FBC SEC. 406.3.5 FOR | | | ALLOWING A 1 HOUR ROOF RATING. THIS SECTION IS FOR AREA | | | & HEIGHT IN THE 2010 FBC AND DOES NOT REFER TO ANY | | | HOURLY RATING. CLARIFY. | | | 5) THE NARRATIVE ALSO REFERS TO SEC. 713.4.2.1 OF THE | | | FBC - THIS SECTION IN THE 2010 FBC REFERS TO | | | NONCOMBUSTIBLE PENETRATING ITEMS THAT CONNECT NOT MORE | | | THAN THREE STORIES ARE PERMITTED. THIS SECTION APPLIES | | | TO NONFIRE - RESISTANCE RATED ASSEMBLIES. CLARIFY HOW | | | THIS APPLIES TO THIS ISSUE WHEN THE STAIR ENCLOSURE IS | | | A 2 HOUR RATED ENCLOSURE. | | | 6) THE NARRATIVE ALSO REFERS TO FBC SEC.708.4 WHICH | | | REFERS TO THE FIRE RATING OF SHAFT ENCLOSURES. THIS | | | STRUCTURE IS 8 STORIES AND REQUIRES A 2 HOUR RATING FOR | | | THE THE HORIZONTAL SHAFT ENCLOSURE. | | | AT THIS POINT DUE TO THE DISCRPANCIES IN THE SUBMITTED | | | DOCUMENTS I HAVE NO IDEA IF YOUR DESIGN IS GOING TO BE | | | 2 HOUR RATED OR IF YOU ARE STILL ATTEMPTING TO GET A 1 | | | HOUR RATING APPROVED WHICH DOES NOT MEET CODE. | | | | | | TIM LARGE | | | CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6692 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2017-03-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2017-03-14 |
Time |
12:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2017-03-14 |
Time |
11:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-03-14 12:00:58 | 1) INDICATE THE REQUIRED FIRE RATING OF THE STAIRWAY ON | | | THE DRAWINGS.FROM THE ORIGINAL DRAWINGS THIS IS A 2 | | | HOUR RATED STAIRWAY. | | | 2) INDICATE THE FIRE RATING OF THE ENCLOSURE FOR THE | | | PIPING ON THE DRAWINGS. THE DRAWINGS NOTE 2 LAYERS OF | | | 5/8 INCH TYPE X DRYWALL ON METAL STUD FRAMING WHICH | | | WOULD PROVIDE AN 80 MINUTE FIRE RATING WHICH IS LESS | | | THAN THE 2 HOUR RATING OF THE ENCLOSURE.THIS PIPING | | | ENCLOSURE SHALL BE THE SAME RATING AS THE ENCLOSURE IN | | | WHICH IT IS LOCATED.FBC 713..4, 713.5. | | | 3) INDICATE THE GAUGE OF THE METAL STUDS BEING USED. | | | | | | TIM LARGE | | | CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6692 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|