| Plan Review Stops For Permit 17010773 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2017-08-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cthroop |
Date |
2017-08-08 |
Time |
09:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cthroop |
Date |
2017-08-08 |
Time |
08:25 |
Sent To |
FIRE |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2017-04-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cthroop |
Date |
2017-04-07 |
Time |
13:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cthroop |
Date |
2017-04-07 |
Time |
13:34 |
Sent To |
FIRE |
|
| Notes |
| 2017-04-07 13:41:09 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | 2014 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W/2010 WEST PALM BEACH | | | AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1 | | | ADMINISTRATION | | | | | | CHRISTOPHER S. THROOP, C.B.O. | | | PLANS EXAMINER, PX3169 | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DIVISION | | | TEL: 561-805-6726 | | | FAX: 561-805-6676 | | | | | | 1ST REVIEW | | | RESULTS: DENIED | | | ADDRESS THE ATTACHED COMMENTS AND RE-SUBMIT | | | | | | ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, SYSTEMS AND | | | SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING. | | | | | | 1. PROVIDE DETAIL FOR NEW FENCE POST TO DECK | | | CONNECTION. | | | 2. PROVIDE REINFORCING DETAIL FOR ALL NEW FENCE/WALL | | | LOCATIONS. | | | | | | FBC 107.2.1 INFORMATION ON CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. | | | CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE | | | DIMENSIONED AND DRAWN UPON SUITABLE MATERIAL. | | | CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT CLARITY | | | TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE AND EXTENT OF THE WORK | | | PROPOSED AND SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT WILL CONFORM TO THE | | | PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE AND RELEVANT LAWS, ORDINANCES, | | | RULES AND REGULATIONS, AS DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING | | | OFFICIAL. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2017-02-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cthroop |
Date |
2017-02-10 |
Time |
10:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cthroop |
Date |
2017-02-10 |
Time |
10:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-02-10 10:02:53 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | 2014 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W/2010 WEST PALM BEACH | | | AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1 | | | ADMINISTRATION | | | | | | CHRISTOPHER S. THROOP, C.B.O. | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER, PX3169 | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DIVISION | | | TEL: 561-805-6726 | | | FAX: 561-805-6676 | | | | | | 1ST REVIEW | | | RESULTS: DENIED | | | ADDRESS THE ATTACHED COMMENTS AND RE-SUBMIT | | | | | | 1. PROPOSED WORK MAY BE ALTERED DUE TO FIRE AND ZONING | | | COMMENTS. | | | 2. COMPLY WITH FIRE AND ZONING COMMENTS AND RE-SUBMIT. | | | 3. NO BUILDING REVIEW PERFORMED AT THIS TIME. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2017-08-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
2017-08-11 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2017-08-10 |
Time |
17:03 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2017-04-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
2017-04-10 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2017-04-10 |
Time |
13:20 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2017-02-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
2017-02-07 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2017-02-03 |
Time |
16:00 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2017-02-03 17:33:02 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE | | | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | 1) SHEET A1.1 - A WOOD FENCE IS INDICATED AT THE EXIT | | | PATH LEADING FROM THE EXIT STAIR DOOR AND HALLWAY EXIT | | | DOOR. | | | | | | PER NFPA 101, CHAPTER 7 MEANS OF EGRESS | | | | | | 7.2.2.5.2* EXPOSURES. | | | 7.2.2.5.2.1 WHERE NONRATED WALLS OR UNPROTECTED OPENING | | | ENCLOSE THE EXTERIOR OF A STAIRWAY, OTHER THAN AN | | | EXISTING STAIRWAY, AND THE WALLS OR OPENINGS ARE | | | EXPOSED BY OTHER PARTS OF THE BUILDING AT AN ANGLE OF | | | LESS THAN 180 DEGREES, THE BUILDING ENCLOSURE WALLS | | | WITHIN 10 FT (3050 MM) HORIZONTALLY OF THE NONRATED | | | WALL OR UNPROTECTED OPENING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS | | | REQUIRED FOR STAIRWAY ENCLOSURES, INCLUDING OPENING | | | PROTECTIVES. | | | | | | | | | THE NON RATED FENCE IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE | | | ABOVE, PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | | | | | | | | | 2) SHEET A1.1 - A CONCRETE WALL IS INDICATED NEXT TO | | | THE EXISTING BACKFLOW PREVENTOR. THERE IS NO SEPARATION | | | DIMENSION INDICATED AND OR ANY INDICATION THAT THIS | | | WALL WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH ANY REPAIR/TESTING AND/OR | | | MAINTENANCE WORK. | | | | | | PER NFPA 24, UNDERGROUND FIRE LINE | | | | | | 6.5 BACKFLOW PREVENTION ASSEMBLIES | | | 6.5.1 WHERE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 6.2.11(4), BACKFLOW | | | PREVENTION ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH THEIR INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. | | | | | | NFPA 13 | | | | | | 8.17.4.6* BACKFLOW DEVICES. | | | | | | A.8.17.4.6 WHERE BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICES ARE | | | INSTALLED, THEY SHOULD BE IN AN ACCESSIBLE LOCATION TO | | | PROVIDE FOR SERVICE AND MAINTENANCE. | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A SPECIFIC SEPARATION DIMENSION AND A | | | REVIEW/NARRATIVE FROM THE FIRE SPRINKLER | | | INSTALLER/MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR THAT IT COMPLIES WITH | | | THEIR REQUIRMENTS AND/OR THE CODE. | | | | | | | | | | | | 3) SHEET A1.1 - THERE IA A CONCRETE WALL/STRUCTUREL BY | | | THE BACKFLOW PREVENTOR THAT MAY CROSS OVER THE | | | UNDERGROUND FIRE LINE. | | | | | | PER NFPA 24, UNDERGROUND FIRE LINE | | | | | | 10.6 PROTECTION AGAINST DAMAGE. | | | 10.6.1 PIPE SHALL NOT BE RUN UNDER BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 10.6.5* PIPE JOINTS SHALL NOT BE LOCATED UNDER | | | FOUNDATION FOOTINGS. | | | | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAILED REVIEW FROM A CERTIFIED | | | ENGINEER OR OTHER QUALIFIED ENTITY REGARDING THE ABOVE | | | NOTE AND THAT THE WALL WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH ANY | | | POSSIBLE CONDITION OR MAINTENANCE/REPAIR CONCERNS. | | | | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2017-08-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2017-08-31 |
Time |
16:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2017-08-18 |
Time |
09:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-08-23 09:18:06 | RESUB ROUTED TO ESCHNEIDER VIA ZONING INBOX |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2017-08-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2017-08-23 |
Time |
09:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2017-07-19 |
Time |
14:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-07-20 14:49:48 | RESUB ROUTED TO FIRE ESCHNEIDER VIA ZONING INBOX |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2017-04-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2017-04-25 |
Time |
14:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2017-03-30 |
Time |
15:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-03-31 15:50:02 | RESUB ROUTED TO ESCHNEIDER VIA ZONING INBOX |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2017-02-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cthroop |
Date |
2017-02-10 |
Time |
10:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cthroop |
Date |
2017-01-23 |
Time |
09:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-01-25 09:20:29 | ROUTED TO ZONING |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2017-08-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2017-08-31 |
Time |
16:24 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2017-08-31 |
Time |
16:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-08-31 16:25:47 | FAILED | | | | | | PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES. | | | | | | 1) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PROPOSED INSTALLATION OF THE | | | WALL AND FENCES CHANGES THE APPROVED SITE PLAN AND THUS | | | REQUIRES THE APPROVAL OF A MINOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT | | | AMENDMENT PRIOR TO THE APPROVAL OF THIS PERMIT | | | APPLICATION BY ZONING. PLEASE SUBMIT AN APPLICATION TO | | | THE CITY'S PLANNING DIVISION. | | | | | | 2) ONCE THE MINOR AMENDMENT IS SUBMITTED ZONING WILL | | | APPROVE. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | [email protected] | | | | | 2017-08-24 14:50:41 | ROUTED TO ERIC SCHNEIDER |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2017-08-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2017-08-04 |
Time |
11:46 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2017-08-04 |
Time |
11:46 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2017-08-04 11:48:01 | FAILED | | | | | | PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES. | | | | | | 1) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PROPOSED INSTALLATION OF THE | | | WALL AND FENCES CHANGES THE APPROVED SITE PLAN AND THUS | | | REQUIRES THE APPROVAL OF A MINOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT | | | AMENDMENT PRIOR TO THE APPROVAL OF THIS PERMIT | | | APPLICATION BY ZONING. PLEASE SUBMIT AN APPLICATION TO | | | THE CITY'S PLANNING DIVISION. | | | | | | 2) THE LANDSCAPE PLANS IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE CHANGES | | | TO SHEET A1.1 (USE OF EXISTING RAIL INSTEAD OF THE NEW | | | SCREEN WALL AND THE CONCRETE WALL INSTEAD OF THE | | | ALUMINUM WALL). ALL PLANS NEED TO SHOW THE SAME | | | CONDITIONS. | | | | | | 3) ONCE THE MINOR AMENDMENT IS SUBMITTED AND THE PLANS | | | ALL MATCH, ZONING WILL APPROVE. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | [email protected] | | 2017-07-20 16:59:55 | ROUTED TO ERIC SCHNEIDER |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2017-04-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2017-04-25 |
Time |
14:04 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2017-04-25 |
Time |
14:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-04-25 14:05:15 | FAILED | | | | | | PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES. | | | | | | 1) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PROPOSED INSTALLATION OF THE | | | WALL AND FENCES CHANGES THE APPROVED SITE PLAN AND THUS | | | REQUIRES THE APPROVAL OF A MINOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT | | | AMENDMENT PRIOR TO THE APPROVAL OF THIS PERMIT | | | APPLICATION BY ZONING. PLEASE SUBMIT AN APPLICATION TO | | | THE CITY'S PLANNING DIVISION. | | | | | | 2) THE PLANS ARE INCONSISTENT. SHEET A1.1 - NOTE 1 | | | CALLS OUT AN ALUMINUM SCREEN WALL AND DETAIL A1/A1.2 | | | SHOWS THIS AS ALUMINUM, WHILE DETAIL A3/A1.2 DESCRIBES | | | THIS AS A NEW DECORATIVE WOOD FENCE. | | | | | | 3) REPEAT COMMENT: THE NEW SCREEN WALL WILL CREATE AN | | | UNSAFE SITUATION BETWEEN VEHICLES ENTERING THE SITE AND | | | THOSE EXITING THE LOADING BAYS BY BLOCKING THE | | | VISIBILITY AT THE INTERSECTION. THE VIEW IN THIS AREA | | | MAY NOT BE OBSTRUCTED. THIS WALL SEEMS TO HAVE LIMITED | | | SCREENING POTENTIAL. | | | | | | 4) REPEAT QUESTION: DRAWING L5 ON SHEET A1.2 SHOWS | | | VALET ENTRANCES ON EITHER SIDE OF THE WALL THAT IS | | | BEING TREATED WITH THE VENEER PANELS. PLEASE EXPLAIN | | | THIS NOTE (VALET ENTRANCE). THIS AREA IS NOT PERMITTED | | | FOR VALET OPERATIONS. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | | | | | | | | | 2017-04-11 16:08:37 | ROUTED TO ERIC SCHNEIDER |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2017-02-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2017-02-02 |
Time |
14:09 |
Rev Time |
0.75 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2017-02-02 |
Time |
14:09 |
Sent To |
FIRE |
|
| Notes |
| 2017-02-02 14:12:41 | FAILED | | | | | | PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES. | | | | | | 1) THE PROPOSED INSTALLATION OF THE WALL AND FENCES | | | CHANGES THE APPROVED SITE PLAN AND THUS REQUIRES THE | | | APPROVAL OF A MINOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT PRIOR | | | TO THE APPROVAL OF THIS PERMIT APPLICATION BY ZONING. | | | PLEASE SUBMIT AN APPLICATION TO THE CITY'S PLANNING | | | DIVISION. | | | | | | 2) THERE IS A PLANTING BED TO THE SOUTH OF THE BACKFLOW | | | PREVENTER, WHICH APPEARS TO BE IN DIRECT CONFLICT WITH | | | THE PROPOSED WALL LOCATION. YOU MAY NOT REDUCE THE | | | AMOUNT OF LANDSCAPE ON THE SITE. PROVIDE HOW THE | | | LANDSCAPE SQUARE FOOTAGE AND MATERIAL WILL BE | | | PRESERVED. | | | | | | 3) FLOOR PLAN KEY NOTE 5 ON SHEET A1.1 CALLS OUT AN 8 | | | FOOT CMU WALL; HOWEVER, THE WALL IS SHOWN AT 6 FEET IN | | | HEIGHT ON SHEET A1.2. | | | | | | 4) THE PROPOSED CMU WALL (AT EITHER SIX OR EIGHT FEET) | | | WILL BLOCK THE REQUIRED PEDESTRIAN AHEAD SIGN. PROVIDE | | | HOW THIS WARNING NOTICE WILL BE RETAINED IN A LOCATION | | | WHICH NOTIFIES DRIVERS OF THE UPCOMING PEDESTRIAN | | | WALKWAY AND CROSSING? | | | | | | 5) THE PROPOSED CMU WALL WILL OBSTRUCT DRIVERS FROM | | | SEEING PEOPLE EXITING THE STAIRWELL IN THE CASE OF A | | | EMERGENCY. | | | | | | 6) THE NEW CYPRESS WOOD SCREEN WALL WILL CREATE AN | | | UNSAFE SITUATION BETWEEN VEHICLES ENTERING THE SITE AND | | | THOSE EXITING THE LOADING BAYS BY BLOCKING THE | | | VISIBILITY AT THE INTERSECTION. | | | | | | 7) DRAWING L5 ON SHEET A1.2 SHOWS VALET ENTRANCES ON | | | EITHER SIDE OF THE WALL THAT IS BEING TREATED WITH THE | | | VENEER PANELS. PLEASE EXPLAIN THIS NOTE. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | | | 2017-01-26 14:15:07 | ROUTED TO ERIC SCHNEIDER |
|
|
