| Plan Review Stops For Permit 17010048 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2018-05-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2018-05-27 |
Time |
10:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2018-05-27 |
Time |
10:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2017-08-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2017-08-29 |
Time |
16:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2017-08-29 |
Time |
16:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-08-29 16:39:00 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014) | | | FBC B = FBC BUILDING | | | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING | | | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY | | | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION | | | | | | COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW: | | | | | | 1. OK | | | | | | 2. DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW PRODUCTS FOR COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE DESIGN DOCUMENTS PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL. | | | SUPERIMPOSED LOADS, DESIGN PRESSURES SHOULD BE REVIEWED | | | PRIOR TO SUBMISSION TO THE BUILDING DIVISION. | | | | | | 3RD REVIEW, UPDATED ENGINEERING WAS NOT REVIEWED. | | | PLEASE DO SO AT THIS TIME. | | | | | | 3. THREE SETS REQUIRED FBC 107. | | | | | | 3RD REVIEW, THREE SETS ARE STILL REQUIRED, TWO | | | SUBMITTED. | | | | | | 4-5. OK | | | | | | NEW COMMENTS: | | | | | | 6. THE ORIGINAL PACKAGE HAD CALCULATIONS WHICH WERE NOT | | | INCLUDED IN THIS RESUBMITTAL. PLEASE PROVIDE. | | | | | | 7. ONLY PYRAMID DRAWINGS SHOULD BE IN THIS SUBMITTAL. | | | THE GRAND STAIR WAS SUBMITTED UNDER A DIFFERENT | | | TRACKING NUMBER. PLEASE REMOVE AND RESUBMIT UNDER THE | | | CORRECT NUMBER. | | | | | | 8. CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE THREE IDENTICAL, ORIGINAL, | | | COLLATED SETS OF DRAWINGS FOR SUBMITTAL ISSUANCE. OLD | | | DENIED DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE RETAINED IN THE PACKAGE AND | | | MARKED "VOID". | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2017-06-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2017-06-15 |
Time |
07:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2017-06-15 |
Time |
07:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-06-15 07:40:31 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014) | | | FBC B = FBC BUILDING | | | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING | | | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY | | | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION | | | | | | 1. THE SKYLIGHT WAS DESIGNED TO FBC 2010, GOVERNING | | | CODE IS FBC 2014, REVISE. | | | | | | SEE SHEET 1 OF 13 PREPARED BY DUANE D. BOICE, PE, OTHER | | | LOCATIONS - ONE IS MARKED UP BY SEOR TO BE REVISED. | | | | | | 2. DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW PRODUCTS FOR COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE DESIGN DOCUMENTS PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL. | | | SUPERIMPOSED LOADS, DESIGN PRESSURES SHOULD BE REVIEWED | | | PRIOR TO SUBMISSION TO THE BUILDING DIVISION. | | | | | | 3. THREE SETS REQUIRED FBC 107. | | | | | | 4. DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED FOR | | | PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED, DATED ORIGINALS | | | FS471. | | | | | | 5. THE SHEET REFERENCED, S102, IS PART OF A REVISION | | | THAT HAS NOT YET BEEN ISSUED. UNTIL THAT SHEET IS | | | ISSUED, IT IS NOT A PART OF THE PERMIT RECORD SET. | | | | | | IT WAS SUGGESTED (MONTHS AGO) THAT APPLICANT SUBMIT | | | THAT ONE SHEET AS A REVISION. | | | | | | OR, GET REVISION 17020076 (MODIFICATION OF KITCHEN | | | LAYOUT)ISSUED. THE REVISION HAS PASSED ALL REVIEWS | | | EXCEPT FOR IMPACT FEES. BE ADVISED THAT ***NO WORK*** | | | UNDER THAT REVISION CAN BE INSTALLED UNTIL THE REVISION | | | IS ISSUED. EITHER REQUEST TO HAVE THE REVISION REVOKED | | | AND ALL INSTALLATION IS TO CONFORM TO THE PERMIT | | | DOCUMENTS ISSUED TO DATE, OR ADDRESS THE IMPACT FEE | | | COMMENT AND HAVE THIS REVISION ISSUED. | | | | | | IT IS NOT CLEAR WHY THIS HAS NOT BEEN ADDRESSED AS THE | | | IMPACT FEES DUE WILL LIKELY BE MINIMAL. IT IS MY | | | UNDERSTANDING THAT THE SQUARE FOOT AREA ADDED WAS LESS | | | THAN 200 FEET. | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2017-01-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2017-01-24 |
Time |
11:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2017-01-24 |
Time |
11:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-01-24 11:20:08 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | REVISED 1/27/17 | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014) | | | FBC B = FBC BUILDING | | | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING | | | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY | | | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION | | | | | | 1. THE CALCULATIONS SHOW A DP OF +30.2 / -83.6. SEE | | | SHEET S102, THIS DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM DESIGN | | | PRESSURES SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. | | | | | | 2. THE SKYLIGHT WAS DESIGNED TO FBC 2010, GOVERNING | | | CODE IS FBC 2014, REVISE. | | | | | | 3. DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW PRODUCTS FOR COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE DESIGN DOCUMENTS PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL. | | | SUPERIMPOSED LOADS, DESIGN PRESSURES SHOULD BE REVIEWED | | | PRIOR TO SUBMISSION TO THE BUILDING DIVISION. | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2018-05-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2018-05-27 |
Time |
10:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2018-05-14 |
Time |
16:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-05-15 16:14:25 | RESUB ROUTED TO SHILL |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2017-08-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2017-08-29 |
Time |
16:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2017-08-24 |
Time |
10:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-08-28 10:34:53 | SIGNATURES ROUTED TO SHILL'S DESK |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2017-06-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2017-06-15 |
Time |
07:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2017-05-26 |
Time |
10:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-05-30 10:22:34 | RESUB ROUTED TO SHILL |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2017-01-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2017-01-24 |
Time |
11:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2017-01-03 |
Time |
11:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-01-04 11:30:16 | SUBMITTAL ROUTED TO SHILL |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2017-08-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2017-08-29 |
Time |
16:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2017-08-29 |
Time |
16:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-08-29 16:41:43 | THIS IS NOT A DIGITAL SUBMITTAL. THIS WAS GIVEN A | | | "DIGITAL" DESIGNATION AT TIME OF INTAKE AS THE MASTER | | | WAS DIGITAL, AND WAS NOT CORRECTED UNTIL 8/29/17. | | | | | | |
|
|
