| 2017-03-15 09:22:54 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3), SECOND BUILDING |
| | REVIEW CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | NOTE: ENGINEER OF RECORD MAY BE CHARGED FOUR TIMES THE |
| | PLAN REVIEW FEE AS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE |
| | 553.80(2)(B) WHEN THE PLANS ARE REJECTED THREE OR MORE |
| | TIMES. |
| | |
| | 1- NOW THAT FLOOR PLANS ARE COMPLETE SHOWING A COMPLETE |
| | LAYOUT OF THE FLOOR PLANS, INCLUDING ALL PLUMBING |
| | FIXTURES, IT IS CLEAR THAT THE FIRST FLOOR STUDY ROOM |
| | DOESN'T COMPLY WITH THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. |
| | R311.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. NEED TO HAVE A CONTINUOUS AND |
| | UNOBSTRUCTED PATH OF HORIZONTAL EGRESS TRAVEL FROM THE |
| | STUDY ROOM. PASSING THRU THE BATHROOM IN ORDER TO EXIT |
| | THE STUDY ROOM IS NOT ALLOWED. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | ALSO, THIS IS NOT A HALF BATHROOM. THIS IS A FULL |
| | BATHROOM. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 2- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | FAC 61G20-3.002(33) FOR: |
| | A) ARCHED SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS AS SHOWN ON |
| | PLANS/ELEVATIONS. |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | B) CASEMENT WINDOWS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | RESPONSE: NEED TO PROVIDEE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | COVER PAGE THAT INCLUDES DRAWINGS SUBMITTED. IF THERE |
| | IS NO FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL, THEN MANUFACTURER MAY |
| | SUBMIT COMPLETE SIGNED AND SEALED (ORIGINALS) DRAWINGS |
| | FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL. NOTE: DRAWINGS SUBMITTED |
| | ARE FOR VINYL WINDOWS. HISTORIC DOESN'T ALLOW VINYL |
| | WINDOWS. DRAWINGS SUBMITTED ARE FOR NON-IMPACT VINYL |
| | CASEMENT WINDOWS. NEED HURRICANE SHUTTERS PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | C) HURRICANE SHUTTERS. COORDINATE WITH ITEM #2(B) |
| | ABOVE. AND PROVIDE COMPLETE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. SEE |
| | CITY SAMPLE. |
| | |
| | D) ROOF TILE AS SHOWN ON PLANS |
| | RESPONSE: CLARIFY ROOF TILE ATTACHMENT. USING |
| | NAILS/SCREWS OR ADHESIVE. CLARIFY WHY FLORIDA PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL FL7804-R9 SUBMITTED IS HIGHLIGHTED ON PAGE 7 |
| | OF 9 WITH A MECHANICALLY FASTENED ATTACHMENT METHOD AND |
| | WHY SUBMITTING A PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR ROOF TILE |
| | ADHESIVE. IF USING , NAILS/SCREWS, THEN ENGINEER OF |
| | RECORD TO SPECIFY SIZE AND NUMBER OF SCREWS. SEC. |
| | 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS AND R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | E) ROOF TILE SELF-ADHERED UNDERLAYMENT AS SPECIFIED ON |
| | PLANS. |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | F) FLAT ROOF AS SHOWN ON PLANS FOR GARAGE AND ROOF DECK |
| | ABOVE FRONT PORCH. AND CLEARLY IDENTIFY WHICH APPROVED |
| | ASSEMBLY IS GOING TO BE USED. AND, PROVIDE SIGNED AND |
| | SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS IF SELECTED ASSEMBLY |
| | DOESN'T MEET THE CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURES. NOTE: |
| | VERIFY THAT SELECTED ASSEMBLY ALLOWS FOR RAS 117 |
| | CALCULATIONS. |
| | RESPONSE: THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | SUBMITTED: FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL FL16733-R3 AND NOA |
| | 13-0409.09. CLARIFY WHICH ONE IS GOING TO BE USED IN |
| | THIS PROJECT. OR IF USING BOTH, THEN CLEARLY SPECIFY |
| | WHERE EACH PRODUCT APPROVAL IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED: |
| | GARAGE OR MAIN HOUSE ROOF DECK ABOVE FRONT PORCH. |
| | NOTES: (1) SELECTED ASSEMBLY W-8 FROM FLORIDA PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL FL16733-R3 REQUIRES SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 |
| | CALCULATIONS FOR NAIL ENHANCEMENT AT PERIMETER AND |
| | CORNER AREAS. PROVIDE SUCH CALCULATIONS. (2) NONE OF |
| | THE ASSEMBLIES SUBMITTED WITH NOA 13-0409.09 CAN BE |
| | USED BECAUSE THEY ARE LIMITED BY GENERAL LIMITATION #9. |
| | GENERAL LIMITATION #9 DOESN'T ALLOW RAS 117 |
| | CALCULATIONS. NEED TO SELECT ASSEMBLY THAT IS LIMITED |
| | BY GENERAL LIMITATION #7 AND NEED TO PROVIDE SIGNED AND |
| | SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS TO MEET THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES OF SEC. R301.1 FB-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | G) ALL SIMPSON STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON PLANS |
| | AND DETAILS. PROVIDE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER |
| | PAGE AND PAGE SHOWING THE SPECIFIED CONNECTOR OR |
| | ENGINEER OF RECORD TO LIST THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | NUMBER NEXT TO EACH SPECIFIED CONNECTOR. |
| | RESPONSE: EVALUATION REPORT ESR-2549 AND ESR-2552 |
| | SUBMITTED EXPIRED ON JANUARY 2016 AND MARCH 2016 |
| | RESPECTIVELY. NEED PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR ALL CONNECTORS |
| | SPECIFIED ON PLANS AND NEED CURRENT FLORIDA PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL AND NEED CURRENT ESR REPORTS. |
| | |
| | H) WINDOW MULLION AS SHOWN ON PLANS. AND, CLEARLY |
| | SPECIFY SIZE TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE CALCULATED |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES. |
| | RESPONSE: NEED TO SPECIFY SIZE OF MULLION ON FLORIDA |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL FL11870-R4 SUBMITTED. AND, CLARIFY WHY |
| | SUBMITTING TWO COPIES OF DRAWINGS. |
| | |
| | I) RECTANGULAR AND ARCHED FIXED WINDOWS AS SHOWN ON |
| | PLANS. NOTE: NEED FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE |
| | THAT INCLUDES DRAWINGS SUBMITTED FOR THE RECTANGULAR |
| | WINDOWS. AND NEED PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE ARCHED |
| | WINDOWS. |
| | |
| | 3- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | RESPONSE: NOT ALL THE PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE REVIEWED |
| | BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. SOME PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE |
| | LEFT OUT WITHOUT THE ENGINEER'S APPROVAL. ENGINEER OF |
| | RECORD TO APPROVE IN WRITING EACH PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | 4- PROVIDE SOIL TEST REPORT (2 COPIES). SEC. R401.4 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | 5- PROVIDE DRAINAGE PLAN (2 COPIES) SHOWING COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH SEC. R401.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. NOTE: WATER NEEDS TO |
| | BE DIVERTED AWAY FROM THE FOUNDATION AND TO AN APPROVED |
| | POINT OF COLLECTION |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | 6- SECOND FLOOR WINDOWS NEED TO COMPLY WITH THE WINDOW |
| | FALL PROTECTION AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R312.2 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND |
| | SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE FOR THE WINDOWS ON |
| | THE SECOND FLOOR THAT NEED TO COMPLY WITH THIS SECTION. |
| | RESPONSE: EXTERIOR WINDOWS & DOORS NOTES ON SHEET A2.00 |
| | AND A3.00 ONLY MENTION TO HAVE A WINDOW SILL NOT LESS |
| | THAN 24" ABOVE FINISH FLOOR. BUT PLANS AND EXTERIOR |
| | ELEVATIONS DON'T SHOW HOW THIS IS ACHIEVED. WINDOW |
| | HEIGHT AND SIZES WERE NOT REVISED TO REFLECT THE WINDOW |
| | SILL LOCATION. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO COMPLY. NOTE: KEEP |
| | IN MIND EGRESS REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | 7- PROVIDE INFORMATION FOR THE ROOF VENTILATION AT THE |
| | SEPARATE GARAGE STRUCTURE SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. |
| | R806.2 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | 8- NEW COMMENT: PROPOSED SITE PLAN ON SHEET S2.00/C1.00 |
| | WAS REVISED. SETBACKS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN AND SETBACKS |
| | SHOWN ON THE SURVEY SUBMITTED DON'T MATCH. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 9- SHEET S3.00: PROVIDE COMPLETE FRAMING PLANS, DETAILS |
| | AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE FRONT |
| | PORCH. CLEARLY SPECIFY ALL COLUMNS, BEAMS, ROOF DECK, |
| | ETC. NOTE: 1ST FLOOR ROOF PLAN/FLOOR JOIST PLAN SHOWS A |
| | HEADER THAT LOOKS LIKE IS FLOATING ON THE AIR. HOW IS |
| | THIS HEADER SUPPORTED?. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R301.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | RESPONSE: (A) REPEAT COMMENT. CONSTRUCTION OF THE FRONT |
| | PORCH IS NOT CLEAR. ACCORDING TO PLANS SUBMITTED IT |
| | LOOKS LIKE THE FRONT PORCH DECK ON-THE SECOND FLOOR IS |
| | SUPPORTED ON THE AIR. SPECIFY ALL COLUMNS, BEAMS, |
| | SECOND FLOOR CONSTRUCTION IS NOT CLEAR EITHER. WHY |
| | CONCRETE SLAB AND FLOOR JOISTS?. INFORMATION SHOWN ON |
| | FLOOR PLANS AND CUT SECTION ON SHEET S3.00 DON'T MATCH. |
| | COORDINATE AND REVISE ALL THE INFORMATION AS REQUIRED |
| | TO SHOW A COMPLETE LOAD PATH. |
| | |
| | (B) IT'S NOT CLEAR HOW THE "FORM AND POUR HEADER" |
| | SPECIFIED BY THE FRONT PORCH AREA IS SUPPORTED. IN |
| | ADDITION, THIS IS NOT A "HEADER". THIS IS AN STRUCTURAL |
| | BEAM SUPPORTING THE SECOND FLOOR ABOVE. |
| | |
| | 10- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR |
| | GARAGE AND FRONT PORCH ROOF DRAINAGE SHOWING COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH SEC. R903.4 AND SEC. R903.4.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | SPECIFY ALL DRAINS, SCUPPERS AND OVERFLOW DRAIN, |
| | SCUPPERS. CLEARLY SHOW LOCATION, SIZES, ETC. |
| | RESPONSE: MISSING SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE GARAGE |
| | OVERFLOW DRAINS AND SCUPPERS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | R903.4.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. AND, THERE IS NO INFORMATION |
| | PROVIDED FOR THE FRONT PORCH. |
| | |
| | 11- PROPOSED SITE PLAN ON SHEET C1.00 DOESN'T MATCH |
| | SURVEY SUBMITTED. SETBACKS FOR GARAGE AND MAIN HOUSE |
| | DON'T MATCH.REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC. 107.2.1 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | 12- ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: |
| | A) PROVIDE COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION ON TOP OF |
| | FORM. PROVIDE CORRECT NAME OF BUILDER AND SPECIFY |
| | PERMIT OFFICE AND JURISDICTION NUMBER (604700). SEC. |
| | R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION |
| | (2014). |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | B) NUMBER OF BEDROOMS IS INCORRECT. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION |
| | (2014). |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | C) CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE DONE FOR THE ACTUAL |
| | ORIENTATION OF THE BUILDING NOT FOR THE WORST CASE |
| | SCENARIO. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | D) COOLING INFORMATION ON ITEM #12 IS INCORRECT. IT CAN |
| | NOT BE 18.0 KBTU/HR FOR A 2807 CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). COORDINATE WITH THE |
| | EQUIPMENT SIZING CALCULATIONS. |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | E) HEATING INFORMATION ON ITEM #13 IS INCORRECT. IT CAN |
| | NOT BE 21.5 KBTU/HR FOR A 2807 CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). COORDINATE WITH THE |
| | EQUIPMENT SIZING CALCULATIONS. |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | F) ITEM #15 IS TAKING THE CEILING FAN AND CROSS |
| | VENTILATION CREDITS. NOTE: PLANS DON'T PROVIDE ANY |
| | SPECIFICATIONS TO TAKE THESE CREDITS INTO |
| | CONSIDERATION. COORDINATE WITH ENGINEER OF RECORD. IF |
| | CREDITS ARE GOING TO BE TAKEN, THEN NEED TO PROVIDE |
| | COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH SEC. SEC. R405.7.6 AND SEC. R405.7.4 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | G) THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE CERTIFIED AT THE |
| | BOTTOM BY THE OWNER OR BY THE LEGALLY DESIGNATED AGENT |
| | AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R103.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED HAVE THE NAME OF THE PERSON WHO |
| | PREPARED THE CALCULATIONS AS THE OWNER OR AGENT. IS |
| | THIS PERSON LEGALLY DESIGNATED BY THE OWNER TO SIGN ON |
| | HIS/HER BEHALF?. PROVIDE DOCUMENT SHOWING THAT HE'S |
| | LEGALLY DESIGNATED OR OWNER TO PROVIDE NAME AND |
| | SIGNATURE AT BOTTOM OF FORM. |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | H) REVISE DOORS INFORMATION. CLEARLY SPECIFY WHERE ARE |
| | THE INSULATED DOORS LOCATED . PLANS DON'T SHOW ANY |
| | INSULATED DOOR. DOORS WITH GLAZING NEED TO BE |
| | INCORPORATED IN TO THE WINDOW AREAS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | R405.5.3.3 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | I) PROVIDE THE EPL DISPLAY CARD COMPLETED BY THE |
| | BUILDER AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R405.4.3 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | NOTE: LABELS FOR DOORS AND WINDOWS SHOWING THE U-FACTOR |
| | AND SHGC FACTOR SPECIFIED ON THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS |
| | WILL BE REQUIRED WHEN THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE NOT |
| | USING THE SOFTWARE DEFAULT FACTOR FOR GLAZING. |
| | |
| | 13- NEW COMMENT: 1ST FLOOR PLAN SHEET A3.00 SHOWS A |
| | "FORM AND POUR HEADER" OUTSIDE THE STUDY ROOM. IT'S NOT |
| | CLEAR WHY SHOWING THIS HEADER IN THIS FLOOR PLAN. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. NOTE: |
| | COORDINATE WITH SECOND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN. |
| | |
| | 14- INFORMATION ON THE GARAGE ROOF FRAMING PLAN IS NOT |
| | LEGIBLE. THERE IS OVERLAPPING INFORMATION. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | ***PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESING EACH |
| | COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | ***PLEASE REMOVE ANY REVISED DRAWING AND INSERT NEW |
| | DRAWING. DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS TO PLANS. SUBMITT |
| | OLD DRAWINGS FOR REFERENCE. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |