|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 16111009
| Plan Review Stops For Permit 16111009 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2018-05-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2018-05-27 |
Time |
10:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2018-05-27 |
Time |
10:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2017-06-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2017-06-03 |
Time |
16:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2017-06-03 |
Time |
16:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-06-03 16:27:05 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014) | | | FBC B = FBC BUILDING | | | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING | | | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY | | | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION | | | | | | 1. DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED FOR | | | PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED, DATED | | | ORIGINALS, FS471, FAC61G15-23.002. THIS APPLIES TO THE | | | SKYLIGHT ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS, NOT THE SEOR DELEGATED | | | ENGINEERING REVIEW LETTER. | | | | | | 2. SEE FAC 61G15-23.002(2)(B) REGARDING FORMAT FOR | | | INDEX SHEET. | | | | | | 3. SHEET 2 OF 6 IS NOT SIGNED; CHECK ALL. | | | | | | 4. PRIOR TO RESUBMITTING, HAVE (SKYLIGHT) ENGINEER | | | CONFIRM THAT ALL ENGINEERING IS SIGNED AND SEALED IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH FS471, FAC61G15-23, WHETHER LISTED IN | | | THIS COMMENT LIST OR NOT. THE FLORIDA STATUTE AND THE | | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CAN BE VIEWED ONLINE IN | | | VARIOUS LOCATIONS INCLUDING WWW.FBPE.ORG. | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2017-01-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2017-01-24 |
Time |
08:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2017-01-17 |
Time |
15:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-01-24 09:10:53 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | REVISED 1/27/17 | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014) | | | FBC B = FBC BUILDING | | | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING | | | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY | | | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION | | | | | | 1. THE CALCULATIONS SHOW A DP OF +30.2 / -83.6. SEE | | | SHEET S102, THIS DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM DESIGN | | | PRESSURES SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. | | | | | | 2. THE COMMENTS WERE ADDRESSED BY THE CONTRACTOR RATHER | | | THAN THE ENGINEER. AS THE CONTRACTOR IS NOT A DESIGN | | | PROFESSIONAL AND NOT LICENSED TO DESIGN THE SKYLIGHT, | | | THE BUILDING OFFICIAL HAS DETERMINED THAT IT IS | | | ACCEPTABLE FOR THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF RECORD TO | | | REVIEW THE LETTER PREPARED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND | | | CERTIFY THE INFORMATION ON THE LETTER ALONG WITH THE | | | RELATED DOCUMENTS. OR, SKYLIGHT ENGINEER CAN REVISE | | | DOCUMENTS TO INCORPORATE THE INFORMATION. | | | | | | 3. THE ARCHITECT'S REVIEW STAMP STATES THAT THIS WAS | | | REVIEWED FOR "GENERAL CONFORMANCE." DOES THIS INCLUDE | | | REVIEWING REQUIREMENTS SUCH AS SUPERIMPOSED LOADS ON | | | THE STRUCTURE, DESIGN PRESSURES? EITHER ARCHITECT OR | | | ENGINEER SHOULD REVIEW THESE ITEMS. IF THIS IS NOT | | | WITHIN THE PURVIEW OF THE ARCHITECT'S RESPONSIBILITY, | | | PLEASE HAVE THE SUBMITTAL REVIEWED BY THE ENGINEER. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-12-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-12-01 |
Time |
18:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-12-01 |
Time |
18:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-12-01 18:03:57 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014) | | | FBC B = FBC BUILDING | | | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING | | | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY | | | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION | | | | | | 1. SKYLIGHT CALCS COVER SHEET INCLUDES A STATEMENT | | | ?GLAZING DESIGNED BY OTHERS.? IT IS NOT CLEAR WHAT THIS | | | REFERS TO, FBC 107. | | | | | | 2. THE GLASS PROPOSED IS NOT CLEAR. THE GLASS LOAD | | | RESISTANCE REPORT STATES THAT OUTBOARD LITE IS ? FULY | | | TEMPERED, INBOARD LITE IS ? IN HEAT STRENGTHENED, IT IS | | | NOT CLEAR HOW THIS CORRELATES WITH THE SERIES 500 RIDGE | | | SKYLIGHT SPECIFICATIONS 3 B, WHICH APPEARS TO INDICATE | | | ADDITIONAL LAYERS OF GLASS. | | | | | | 3. THE GLASS SPEC REFERENCES SB72, PROVIDE SPECS AND | | | TEST REPORT OR PRODUCT APPROVAL, FBC 107. | | | | | | 4. THE SPECIFICATIONS STATE THAT THIS IS A SMALL | | | MISSILE HURRICANE TESTED PRODUCT. REVISE TO CLARIFY, IS | | | THE PRODUCT TESTED AS STATED? IF IT HAS BEEN TESTED, | | | PROVIDE A COPY OF THE TEST. IF THE PRODUCT UTILIZES A | | | TESTED PRODUCT, PLEASE REVISE PLAN TO CLARIFY. | | | | | | 5. SHEET 1 OF 6 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS STATES THAT THE | | | CURB AS SUPPLIED BY OTHERS SHOULD ACCEPT ALL LOADING | | | WITHOUT DEFLECTION. WHO HAS REVIEWED THIS? THE | | | ARCHITECT?S REVIEW STAMP IS NOT CLEAR THAT THIS THE | | | CURB WILL ACCEPT LOADING. EITHER HAVE THE ARCHITECT | | | CLARIFY OR HAVE THE ENGINEER (WHO DESIGNED THE CURB) | | | REVIEW. | | | | | | 6. FBC TABLE 601, 1 HOUR FIRE RATING REQUIRED FOR THE | | | ROOF (BUILDING TYPE IIA). | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2018-05-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2018-05-27 |
Time |
10:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2018-05-14 |
Time |
16:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-05-15 16:15:42 | RESUB ROUTED TO SHILL |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2017-06-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2017-06-03 |
Time |
16:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2017-05-26 |
Time |
10:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-05-30 10:24:04 | RESUB ROUTED TO SHILL |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2017-01-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2017-01-24 |
Time |
09:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2017-01-03 |
Time |
10:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-01-04 10:44:18 | RESUB ROUTED TO SHILL |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-12-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-12-01 |
Time |
18:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-11-22 |
Time |
09:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-11-23 09:13:56 | SUBMITTAL ROUTED TO SHILL |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |
|
