| Plan Review Stops For Permit 16110007 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2017-01-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2017-01-25 |
Time |
07:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2017-01-25 |
Time |
07:03 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2017-01-25 08:02:54 | NOTE: SPEC SHEET FOR STOTHERM CI CLASSIC PROVIDED; ASTM | | | E 84 FLAME SPREAD 25, FBC 1403.5, ALSO TESTED NFPA 285 | | | TO 12" |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-11-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-11-16 |
Time |
14:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-11-16 |
Time |
06:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-11-16 14:12:24 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014) | | | FBC B = FBC BUILDING | | | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING | | | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY | | | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION | | | | | | 1. SEE IMPACT FEE REVIEW; REVISE PLAN TO INCLUDE | | | ADDITION SQUARE FOOT TOTALS. | | | | | | 2. PER MECHANICAL REVIEWER (CHRIS COLE, [email protected]), | | | HOW WILL THE INCREASE IN CONDITIONED SPACE AFFECT THE | | | EXISTING MECHANICAL UNITS? HAVE CALCULATIONS BEEN | | | PERFORMED? A MECHANICAL REVIEW HAS NOT BEEN DONE AT | | | THIS TIME AS NO INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED, BUT A | | | MECHANICAL REVIEW WILL BE DONE IN 2ND REVIEW CYCLE. | | | | | | 3. REVISE PLAN TO STATE METHOD OF COMPLIANCE ELECTED BY | | | APPLICANT, FBC EB 301.1. | | | | | | 4. REVISE PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC EB CHAPTER | | | 11, ADDITIONS. | | | | | | 5. ENERGY CALCS REQUIRED, FBC EC 103.1.1. | | | | | | 6. PROVIDE INFORMATION REGARDING THE EIFS COMPLIANCE | | | RE: COMBUSTIBILITY, FBC 602.2 (SUCH AS TEST REPORT, | | | SPEC SHEET). | | | | | | 7. SEE THRESHOLD REVIEW. | | | | | | 8. PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO BE REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF | | | RECORD, FBC 107. | | | | | | 9. FBC 449.1.1, SEE FS 553.80(C):?IN ADDITION TO THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF S. 553.79 AND THIS SECTION, FACILITIES | | | SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 395 AND PARTS II | | | AND VIII OF CHAPTER 400 SHALL HAVE FACILITY PLANS | | | REVIEWED AND CONSTRUCTION SURVEYED BY THE STATE AGENCY | | | AUTHORIZED TO DO SO UNDER THE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER | | | 395 AND PARTS II AND VIII OF CHAPTER 400 AND THE | | | CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. | | | FACILITIES SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF PART IV OF | | | CHAPTER 400 MAY HAVE FACILITY PLANS REVIEWED AND SHALL | | | HAVE CONSTRUCTION SURVEYED BY THE STATE AGENCY | | | AUTHORIZED TO DO SO UNDER THE REQUIREMENTS OF PART IV | | | OF CHAPTER 400 AND THE CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS OF | | | THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. | | | | | | PLEASE ACKNOWLEDGE REQUIREMENT. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2017-01-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
2017-01-17 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2017-01-17 |
Time |
09:37 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-11-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
2016-11-08 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2016-11-07 |
Time |
10:13 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2016-11-07 11:27:36 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE | | | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | | | | 1) ALL LIFE SAFETY SHEETS - UNDER THE LIFE SAFETY | | | GENERAL NOTES IT INDICATES "NO DEVICES OR EXIT OPENINGS | | | ARE ALTERED BY THIS PROJECT." HOWEVER, THERE ARE AD | | | SHEETS INDICATING SPECIFIC EXITS DOORS BEING REPLACED | | | WITH BLOCKED EXIT SIGNS AND REROUTING. | | | | | | PLEASE CLARIFY AND/OR CORRECT WITH AN APPLICABLE NOTE. | | | | | | | | | | | | 2) SHEETS AD 2.1 & 3.1 ARE NOT INDICATED WITH ANY FIRE | | | SPRINKLER PROTECTION COMMENTS. | | | | | | WILL THERE BE ANY SPRINKLER HEADS AFFECTED BY THE | | | CEILING AREA WORK? IF SO ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE BY | | | CERITIFED LIFE SAFETY CONTRACTORS UNDER SEPARATE SHOP | | | DRAWINGS. | | | | | | PLEASE CLARIFY AND/OR CORRECT WITH THE APPLICABLE NOTE. | | | | | | | | | | | | 3) SHEET A 1.0 - NOTE # 7 INDICATES THAT EXIT SIGNS AND | | | EXIT WILL BE BLOCKED WHEN DOORS ARE REPLACED. | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE THE LIFE SAFETY PLANS TO INCLUDE THE | | | ALTERNATE EXITS AND APPLICABLE TEMPORARY EXIT SIGNS | | | LOCATIONS, WHEN AND WERE THE EXITS WILL BE BLOCKED. | | | | | | | | | | | | 4) SHEET A1.0 & A 7.1 - THERE ARE DOORS INDICATED AS | | | BEING REPLACED; TG001 30.3.N, TG272 31.1.N, TG305 | | | 31.3.N, TG013 31.3.N, TG324 1.1.N, TG055 1.1.N, AND | | | TG049 1.1.N. ALL ARE INDICATED AS HAVING NO RATING. | | | | | | IT APPEARS THAT THESE DOORS ARE IN LOCATIONS THAT | | | REQUIRE FIRE RATING. PLEASE REVIEW THE ENGINEER OF | | | RECORD SPECS TO ENSURE THAT THEY ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE | | | RATED. | | | | | | | | | 5) SHEET A1.0 & A 7.1 - THERE ARE THREE (3) DOORS | | | INDICATED AS TG001 30.3.N. THE DOOR TYPES SCHEDULE, | | | UNDER SPECIAL DOOR TYPES, INDICATES DOOR TYPE 30 AS A | | | SLIDING DOOR. HOWEVER, TWO (2) OF THE TG001 DOORS ARE | | | DOUBLE SWING DOORS. | | | | | | PLEASE REVIEW, CLARIFY AND /OR CORRECT. | | | | | | | | | | | | 6) 5) SHEET A1.0 & A 7.1 - THERE IS A DOOR SET | | | INDICATED AS TG272 31.1.N. THE DOOR TYPES SCHEDULE, | | | UNDER SPECIAL DOOR TYPES, INDICATES DOOR TYPE 31 AS A | | | SLIDING DOOR. HOWEVER, THE TG272 DOOR IS A DOUBLE SWING | | | DOOR. | | | | | | PLEASE REVIEW, CLARIFY AND /OR CORRECT. | | | | | | | | | | | | 7) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET | | | REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE | | | ABOVE. | | | | | | | | | | | | 8) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE | | | RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. | | | | | | | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2017-01-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ccole |
Date |
2017-01-30 |
Time |
17:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ccole |
Date |
2017-01-11 |
Time |
11:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-01-25 09:25:41 | 1/25 TO MECH BOX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2017-01-12 11:13:31 | RESUB ROUTED TO FIRE INBOX |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-11-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-11-16 |
Time |
14:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-11-01 |
Time |
16:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-11-02 16:20:07 | ROUTED TO ZONING INBOX |
|
|
| Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2017-01-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2017-01-25 |
Time |
09:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2017-01-25 |
Time |
09:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-01-25 09:32:36 | MU 2016 30826, $17,302.28 | | | | | | RECEIPT SENT TO FILENET VIA EMAIL | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2017-01-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2017-01-24 |
Time |
17:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2017-01-24 |
Time |
17:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-01-24 17:58:36 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014) | | | FBC B = FBC BUILDING | | | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING | | | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY | | | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION | | | | | | MU 2016 30826, $17,302.28 | | | | | | THE PLANS HAVE BEEN STAMPED, BUT THE RECEIPT SHOWING | | | THAT FEES HAVE BEEN PAID WAS NOT PROVIDED. | | | | | | THE RECEIPT MAY BE SENT TO ME VIA EMAIL. AN EMAIL HAS | | | BEEN SENT TO THE CONTRACTOR. | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-11-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-11-16 |
Time |
12:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-11-16 |
Time |
12:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-11-16 12:33:27 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | 1. THIS APPEARS TO BE AN INCREASE IN HABITABLE SPACE | | | (UNDER AIR SQUARE FOOT AREA). REVISE PLAN TO PROVIDE | | | THE EXISTING SQUARE FOOT AREA (EACH FLOOR AND TOTAL), | | | PROPOSED ADDITION (EACH FLOOR AND TOTAL), NEW TOTALS | | | (EACH FLOOR AND TOTAL). | | | | | | IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT BY PALM BEACH COUNTY IS REQUIRED. | | | THE PLANS STAMPED BY THE COUNTY ARE TO BE SUBMITTED AS | | | WELL AS THE RECEIPT SHOWING THAT FEES DUE, IF | | | APPLICABLE, WERE PAID. | | | | | | PLEASE CONTACT 561-233-5025 FOR MORE INFORMATION. | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2017-01-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ccole |
Date |
2017-01-30 |
Time |
17:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ccole |
Date |
2017-01-30 |
Time |
17:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
NFIP |
NFIP REVIEW ACTIVITY |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-11-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-11-16 |
Time |
07:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-11-16 |
Time |
07:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-11-16 07:37:33 | THIS VERY LARGE PARCEL HAS A SMALL PORTION ON THE WEST | | | SIDE OF THE LOT LOCATED IN THE SFHA. THE STRUCTURE | | | UNDER THIS PERMIT, THE MAIN BUILDING (HOSPITAL), IS NOT | | | LOCATED IN THE SFHA. SEE FIRMETTE. THE PERMIT FILE | | | FLOOD FIELD IS NOW CHANGED TO C ZONE RATHER THAN AH | | | 17.0. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
THRESHOLD |
THRESHOLD INSPECTOR DOCUMENTS |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2017-01-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2017-01-27 |
Time |
17:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2017-01-25 |
Time |
06:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-01-25 06:44:08 | *****RESIDENT INSPECTOR**** | | | | | | SIGNED BY OWNER'S REP, GREG DALTON | | | CONTRACTOR, WESTRBOOKE CORPORATION, ROBERT F LAKE JR | | | | | | GFA INTERNATIONAL | | | HECTOR F VERGARA, PE 25764, SI 283 | | | MIKE ADAIR, BN 3227 | | | MARK SHARMAN, BN 4742 | | | JENNINGS HILL, BN 3142 | | | NOEL WOODALL, BN 2505 | | | | | | OK PER KC | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
THRESHOLD |
THRESHOLD INSPECTOR DOCUMENTS |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-11-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-11-30 |
Time |
14:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-11-30 |
Time |
14:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-11-30 14:06:52 | CONFIRMED WITH KC THAT, DUE TO THE SCOPE OF THIS | | | PROJECT, ALTHOUGH THIS IS NOT THRESHOLD (NO STRUCTURAL | | | WORK), A RESIDENT INSPECTOR IS REQUIRED. | | | | | | CONTRACTOR IS TO CONTACT SAMANTHA HILL (561-805-6724) | | | OR KEN CONRAD (561-805-6666) IF HE WOULD LIKE TO | | | DISCUSS | | | | | | PROVIDE: | | | RESIDENT INSPECTOR AGREEMENT SIGNED BY ALL PARTIES | | | INSPECTOR RESUME | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
THRESHOLD |
THRESHOLD INSPECTOR DOCUMENTS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-11-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-11-16 |
Time |
14:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-11-16 |
Time |
14:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-11-16 14:16:58 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | 1. CLARIFY; DOES APPLICANT CONSIDER THIS A THRESHOLD | | | BUILDING, FS552.79? IF YES, HAVE ENGINEER ADD THE | | | STATEMENT REQUIRED BY FS 553.79(7)(D) AND PROVIDE A | | | THRESHOLD INSPECTION PLAN. | | | | | | 2. IF IT IS AGREED THAT THIS IS A THRESHOLD PROJECT, | | | COMPLETE THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR AGREEMENT. THIS WAS SENT | | | VIA EMAIL TO [email protected]. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE RESUMES FOR THE CONTRACTOR, INSPECTORS, SI, | | | AND SI FIRM. | | | | | | 4. THRESHOLD DOCUMENTS MAY BE SENT VIA EMAIL FOR | | | PRELIMINARY REVIEW. | | | | | | 5. IF APPLICANT DISAGREES THAT THIS IS THRESHOLD, | | | PLEASE CONTACT ME TO DISCUSS. A RESIDENT INSPECTOR MAY | | | BE REQUIRED DEPENDING ON APPLICANT'S SCHEDULE AND THE | | | BUILDING DEPARTMENT'S ABILITY TO COMPLETE INSPECTIONS | | | TO MAINTAIN THE SCHEDULE. ALL OF THE SAME INFORMATION | | | IS REQUIRED FOR A RESIDENT INSPECTOR PROJECT, BUT THE | | | RESIDENT INSPECTOR AGREEMENT IS TO BE COMPLETED. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-11-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
njwira |
Date |
2016-11-04 |
Time |
14:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
njwira |
Date |
2016-11-04 |
Time |
14:23 |
Sent To |
FIRE |
|
| Notes |
|
|