|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 16080691
| Plan Review Stops For Permit 16080691 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-09-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-09-20 |
Time |
09:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-09-20 |
Time |
09:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-09-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-09-12 |
Time |
09:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-09-12 |
Time |
09:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-09-12 09:59:41 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | 1. THE BASE SHEET FASTENING FOR THE JOHNS MANVILLE | | | MODIFIED DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE CORRECT, FBC 1609. SEE | | | PERIMETER AND CORNER FASTENING; IT APPEARS THAT THE | | | PERIMETER REQUIRES 4" FASTENING FOR 3 FIELD ROWS, | | | CORNER ZONES REQUIRE 5". (IT APPEARS THAT THE WRONG | | | COLUMN WAS UTILIZED WHEN SPECIFYING FASTENING; | | | CALCULATIONS APPEAR CORRECT.) | | | | | | 2. WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE COLLATE THREE IDENTICAL | | | COMPLETE SETS FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-08-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-08-18 |
Time |
11:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-08-18 |
Time |
11:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-08-18 11:38:17 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | 1. TWO SETS OF THE ROOF PLAN WERE SUBMITTED. THREE | | | COMPLETE SETS REQUIRED, FBC 107. | | | | | | 2. TWO SETS OF THE ROOF TILE PRODUCT APPROVAL AND | | | ENGINEERING WERE SUBMITTED; THREE REQUIRED, FBC 107. | | | | | | 3. THE ENGINEERING FOR THE ROOF TILE ATTACHMENT IS A | | | PHOTOCOPY. FS471, DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ENGINEER AND | | | SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED | | | DATED ORIGINALS. | | | | | | 4. SEE PRIOR CORRECTION LISTS. IF A REVIEW LETTER IS | | | SUBMITTED IN LIEU OF AN INTIALED/DATED SHOP DRAWING | | | REVIEW STAMP DIRECTLY ON THE SUBMITTAL, THE LETTER IS | | | TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED (PER BUILDING OFFICIAL), FBC | | | 107. | | | | | | 5. PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO BE REVIEWED BY THE DESIGNER | | | OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL, FBC 107 (ROOF HATCH | | | PRODUCT APPROVAL). | | | | | | 6. THE ROOF HATCH PRODUCT APPROVAL IS ILLEGIBLE DUE TO | | | THE SIZE. THE DRAWING SHEETS WERE PRINTED HALF SIZE | | | (PORTRAIT ORIENTATION RATHER THAN LANDSCAPE). THIS | | | DOCUMENT IS USED FOR PLAN REVIEW, INSPECTIONS, AND | | | RETAINED AS A PART OF THE PERMIT RECORD FOREVER. A | | | CLEAR LEGIBLE COPY IS REQUIRED, FBC 107. | | | | | | 7. THE BASE SHEET CALCULATIONS ARE A PHOTOCOPY. | | | DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED FOR | | | PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED DATED ORIGINALS, | | | FS471. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-09-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-09-12 |
Time |
10:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-09-08 |
Time |
14:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-08-17 13:21:08 | SHILL'S DESK |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |
|
