Plan Review Details - Permit 16071097
Plan Review Stops For Permit 16071097
Review Stop HIST HISTORICAL
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2016-08-12 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2016-08-12 Time 10:39 Rev Time 0.25
Received By eschneid Date 2016-08-12 Time 10:39 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2016-08-26 Cont ID  
Sent By cpuell Date 2016-08-26 Time 08:00 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cpuell Date 2016-08-25 Time 11:49 Sent To  
Notes
2016-08-25 11:49:48RESUB ROUTED TO ESCHNEIDER VIA ZONING INBOX
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2016-08-22 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2016-08-22 Time 11:39 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date 2016-08-15 Time 08:52 Sent To  
Notes
2016-08-16 08:52:27RESUB ROUTED TO ESCHNEIDER VIA ZONING INBOX
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2016-08-12 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2016-08-12 Time 10:41 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date 2016-07-26 Time 09:03 Sent To  
Notes
2016-07-27 09:03:38ROUTED TO ZONING
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2016-08-25 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2016-08-25 Time 17:45 Rev Time 0.50
Received By eschneid Date 2016-08-25 Time 17:45 Sent To PC
Notes
2016-08-25 17:45:46PASSED W/PROVISOS
  
 1) PER RES. NO. 379-10, GATES/FENCES MAY NOT BLOCK
 PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE ACCESS TO TUXEDO LANE.
  
 2) THE PBDA PLAT SHALL BE RECORDED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF
 FINAL 104 INSPECTION APPROVAL.
  
  
2016-08-25 13:49:42ROUTED TO ERIC SCHNEIDER
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2016-08-22 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2016-08-22 Time 11:30 Rev Time 0.75
Received By eschneid Date 2016-08-22 Time 11:30 Sent To  
Notes
2016-08-22 11:32:06FAILED
  
 PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES. PLEASE NOTE THAT CONTRARY TO
 WHAT IS STATED ON THE PLAN REVIEW RESUBMITTAL FORM,
 THERE WAS NO COVER LETTER RESPONDING TO THE AUGUST 12
 COMMENTS PROVIDED.
  
 1) THANK YOU FOR SUBMITTING THE REVISED ARCHITECTURAL
 SITE PLAN WHICH CORRECTLY SHOWS THE CURRENT AND FUTURE
 LAYOUT OF THE ENTIRE WESTERN PARKING AREA. THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN SUBMITTED WITH THIS PERMIT NOW
 INCORRECTLY SHOWS THE WESTERN PARKING AREA LAYOUT. ALL
 SUBMITTED PLANS SHALL SHOW THE SAME APPROVED, ACCURATE
 CONDITIONS. NOTE: THE LANDSCAPE PLAN IS NOT REQUIRED AS
 PART OF THE FENCE PERMIT AND IT MAY BE APPROPRIATE TO
 REMOVE IT AS IS SHOWS CONFLICTING INFORMATION WITH THE
 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN.
  
 2) AMENDED COMMENT: RESOLUTION NO. 379-10 GOVERNS THE
 LIMITED STREET CLOSURE OF COCOANUT AND TUXEDO LANES TO
 INCLUDE THE TIMES THE CLOSURE IS PERMITTED, THE GATE
 PLACEMENT AND PUBLIC ACCESS.
 A. SECTION 3 OF RESOLUTION NO. 379-10 REQUIRES THAT
 TUXEDO LANE AND COCOANUT LANE REMAIN OPEN TO PEDESTRIAN
 AND BICYCLE TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. THE CURRENT GATE
 LOCATIONS ALLOW PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLISTS TO GO AROUND
 THE GATES AND THUS MEET THIS REQUIREMENT. THE
 RESUBMITTED ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN DOES NOT SHOW THE
 LOCATION OF THE WESTERN GATE ON TUXEDO LANE, BUT RATHER
 JUST A NOTE IS PROVIDED. THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THE GATE
 AND THAT LOCATION, TO INCLUDE SWING POSITION WITH OPEN
 MEETS THE SECTION 3 REQUIREMENT. BLOW UP DETAILS AT THE
 GATES WOULD BE HELPFUL.
  
 3) REPEAT COMMENT: THE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN
 REFERENCES NEW GATES AND FENCING ON SHEET AS2.1. NO
 SHEET EXISTS. IS THIS SUPPOSED TO BE SHEET G2.5? STAFF
 WILL REVIEW IF G2.5 IS THE CORRECT SHEET. HOWEVER,
 SHEET G1.2 SHALL BE CORRECTED TO LIST THE CORRECT
 REFERENCE SHEETS.
  
 4) AMENDED COMMENT: IF FENCE C AND GATE C2 ARE NOT TO
 BE CONSTRUCTION FENCES, THEN THEY MAY HAVE NO SCREENING
 MATERIAL ON THEM. THIS COMMENT IS REPEATED DUE TO THE
 NOTE STATING "1X1 FABRIC COLOR T.B.D." LISTED ON THE
 PLANS. PLEASE CLARIFY NOTE. NOTE: THE LANDSCAPE PLAN
 PROVIDED CALLS THEM OUT AS CONSTRUCTION FENCES.
  
 5) FENCES A AND D, GATE A AT COCOANUT LANE, AND GATE A1
 MEET ZONING REQUIREMENTS.
  
 6) WHY DOES THE FENCE AT THE WESTERN EDGE OF THE FIELD
 WRAP AROUND THE TREES? IT WOULD SEEM THAT THE FENCE
 SHOULD RUN STRAIGHT NORTH/SOUTH WITH THE TREES ON THE
 OUTSIDE OF THE FENCE. EITHER WAY COMPLIES WITH CODE.
  
 7) THE PBDA PLAT SHALL BE RECORDED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF
 FINAL 104 INSPECTION APPROVAL.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
  
2016-08-16 14:01:42ROUTED TO ERIC SCHNEIDER
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2016-08-12 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2016-08-12 Time 10:39 Rev Time 0.75
Received By eschneid Date 2016-07-27 Time 13:50 Sent To  
Notes
2016-08-12 10:41:08FAILED
  
 1) THE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN INCORRECTLY SHOWS THE
 CURRENT AND FUTURE LAYOUT OF THE ENTIRE WESTERN PARKING
 AREA. PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE CORRECT EXISTING AND
 APPROVED BASE INFORMATION IS USED ON THE ARCHITECTURAL
 SITE PLANS.
  
 2) RESOLUTION NO. 379-10 GOVERNS THE LIMITED STREET
 CLOSURE OF COCOANUT AND TUXEDO LANES TO INCLUDE THE
 TIMES THE CLOSURE IS PERMITTED, THE GATE PLACEMENT AND
 PUBLIC ACCESS.
 A. THE PROPOSED GATE BY AUSTIN LANE IS LOCATED OUTSIDE
 OF THE LIMITED STREET CLOSURE AREA AND NOT AT THE
 APPROVED GATE LOCATION.
 B. THERE ARE ONLY TWO GATES PERMITTED, ONE AT EITHER
 END OF THE LIMITED STREET CLOSURE AREA AND NOT WITHIN
 THE STREET CLOSURE. THE GATE LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE
 EAST END OF THE FIELD IS NOT PERMITTED AND SHALL BE
 REMOVED FROM THE PLANS.
 C. SECTION 3 OF RESOLUTION NO. 379-10 REQUIRES THAT
 TUXEDO LANE AND COCOANUT LANE REMAIN OPEN TO PEDESTRIAN
 AND BICYCLE TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. THE CURRENT GATE
 LOCATIONS ALLOW PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLISTS TO GO AROUND
 THE GATES AND THUS MEET THIS REQUIREMENT. THE PROPOSED
 GATE LOCATIONS SEEM TO BLOCK ACCESS. PLEASE PROVIDE
 VERIFICATION THAT THE SECTION 3 REQUIREMENT CAN BE MET.
 BLOW UP DETAILS AT THE GATES WOULD BE HELPFUL.
  
 3) THE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN REFERENCES NEW GATES AND
 FENCING ON SHEET AS2.1. NO SHEET EXISTS. IS THIS
 SUPPOSED TO BE SHEET G2.5? STAFF WILL REVIEW IF G2.5 IS
 THE CORRECT SHEET.
  
 4) PLEASE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ON FENCE C AND GATE
 C2.
 A. HOW TALL IS FENCE C.
 B. FENCE C AND GATES C AND C2 ARE INDICATED AS
 CONSTRUCTION RELATED. PLEASE NOTE THAT IN ACCORDANCE
 WITH SECTION 94-450 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FENCES MAY
 ONLY BE ERECTED WHILE THERE IS AN ACTIVE BUILDING
 PERMIT OPEN FOR THE PROPERTY.
 C. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FENCES AND GATES ARE REQUIRED
 TO HAVE SCREENING THAT IS AT LEAST 85 PERCENT OPACITY.
 PLEASE PROVIDE THE SCREENING DETAILS.
 D. IF THE FENCE AND GATES ARE NOT TO BE CONSTRUCTION
 FENCES, THEN THEY MAY HAVE NO SCREENING MATERIAL ON
 THEM.
  
 5) FENCES A AND D AND GATE A MEET ZONING REQUIREMENTS.
  
 6) THE PBDA PLAT SHALL BE RECORDED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF
 FINAL 104 INSPECTION APPOVAL.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
  
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved