Home Records and Reports Contractor Records Owner Records Permit Records Permit Reports Business Reports Property Records Business Tax My Account Code Enforcement Contact Us Log In/Out Print Plan Review Stops For Permit 16071058 Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) Rev No 6 Status P Date 2017-08-10 Cont ID   Sent By shill Date 2017-08-10 Time 12:56 Rev Time 0.00 Received By shill Date 2017-08-10 Time 12:56 Sent To   Notes 2017-08-10 12:57:06 ****PROVISOS****       SAMANTHA HILL   BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER   [email protected]   561-805-6724       FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014)   FBC B = FBC BUILDING   FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING   FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY   FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION       A. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR SITE AMENITIES, POOL,   POOL DECK, FENCING, PAVING, SIDEWALKS, FIRE ALARM, FIRE   SPRINKLER, FIRE UNDERGROUND, PARKING LOT & STRIPING,   TEMPORARY TRAILER, CONSTRUCTION OFFICES, SIGNS.   SEPARATE PLANS, PERMITS, REVIEWS, AND FEES REQUIRED.       B. WORK AREAS TO COMPLY WITH FBC ACCESSIBILITY (FBC A   902.1 ADVISORY, ABA) PER ARCHITECT       C. FLOORING ACOUSTICAL INSULATION REQUIRED BY FBC 1207   IS TO COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING:       (1) FBC 1207.2, FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLIES SEPARATING   DWELLING UNITS FROM EACH OTHER OR FROM PUBLIC OR   SERVICE AREAS SHALL HAVE A SOUND TRANSMISSION CLASS   (STC) OF NOT LESS THAN 50 (45 IF FIELD TESTED) FOR AIR   BORNE NOISE WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 90.   PROVIDE A COPY OF THE TEST REPORT (WITHOUT A DROPPED   GYPSUM CEILING ASSEMBLY).   (2) FBC 1207.3, FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLIES BETWEEN   DWELLING UNITS OR BETWEEN A DWELLING UNIT AND A PUBLIC   OR SERVICE AREA WITHIN THE STRUCTURE SHALL HAVE AN   IMPACT INSULATION CLASS (IIC) RATING OF NOT LESS THAN   50 (45 IF FIELD TESTED) WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH   ASTM E 492. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE TEST REPORT (WITHOUT   A DROPPED GYPSUM CEILING ASSEMBLY).   (3) FBC 720.2, FLAME SPREAD INDEX OF NOT MORE THAN 25   AND SMOKE DEVELOPED INDEX OF NOT MORE THAN 450   REQUIRED. PROVIDE TEST DATA IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E   84 OR UL 723.       TEST REPORTS, REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF RECORD, ARE TO BE   SUBMITTED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.       D. PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL COMPONENTS   AND CLADDING, FBC 1609. PRODUCT APPROVALS, REVIEWED BY   DESIGNER OF RECORD, ARE TO BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO   INSTALLATION. COMPONENTS AND CLADDING ARE TO COMPLY   WITH THE DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN ON SHEET S0. THE   OPTIONS SELECTED ARE TO BE MARKED ON THE PRODUCT   APPROVALS PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL.       E. A SEPARATE ROOF PERMIT IS REQUIRED. THE PRODUCT   APPROVAL REVIEWED BY DOR IS TO BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO   INSTALLATION. THE APPROVED ASSEMBLY PROPOSED IS TO BE   INDICATED AND ENGINEERING, IF APPLICABLE, SUBMITTED.       F. CIVIL PAGES WERE NOT REVIEWED BY BUILDING; PAVING   WILL BE REVIEWED UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT.       G. FAIR HOUSING COMPLIANCE; SHEET A1.00 HAS A NOTE:   1 BED 75 UNITS WITH TYPE B BATH   2 BED 50 UNITS WITH ONE TYPE A AND ONE TYPE B PER FHA       H. SHORING/RESHORE PLANS AND ENGINEERING REVIEWED BY   CONTRACTOR AND SPECIAL INSPECTOR ARE TO BE SUBMITTED,   REVIEWED AND ISSUED (AS A "SUBMITTAL" TO THE BUILDING   DIVISION) PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. NO AFFECTED WORK TO   COMMENCE WITHOUT THE SHORING/RESHORE ENGINEERING ON   SITE, REVIEWED AND ISSUED BY BUILDING DIVISION.       I. A CONSTRUCTION GUARDRAIL DETAIL, PREPARED BY A   DESIGN PROFESSIONAL LICENSED UNDER FS471 OR FS481, IS   REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED, AND ISSUED BY THE   CITY. SUBJECT TO FIELD INSPECTOR'S DISCRETION, THIS MAY   BE ACCEPTED IN THE FIELD AT TIME OF INSPECTION.       J. FILES SUBMITTED UNDER PERMIT APPLICATION #16071058   WERE REVIEWED. PER APPLICANT, THE SAME PLANS WERE   SUBMITTED FOR PERMITS 16070880, 16070916, 16071059. THE   PLANS APPEAR IDENTICAL. ANY (BUILDING REVIEWED)   DISCREPANCIES ARE SUPERSEDED BY THE PLANS REVIEWED   UNDER 16071058.       K. REGARDING THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS:       PAGE 35, F27 SHOWS A 4TH FLOOR WOOD SLAB; CLARIFY.   PAGE 11 OF 109 AUTO WIND LOAD CALCULATION SHOWS BASIC   WIND SPEED AS 136MPH, BUT PAGE 9 OF 63 IS 170MPH. ONE   APPEARS TO BE VASD, THE OTHER APPEARS TO BE VULT, BUT I   CANNOT FIND WHERE IT STATES THIS, AND IT IS NOT CLEAR   WHY THEY WOULD BE DONE DIFFERENTLY.   PAGE 30 OF 109, TABLE 4.5 STEEL FRAME SUMMARY, ROOF   LABEL C46 HAS A STATUS OF "WARNING: SEE MESSAGE". I WAS   UNABLE TO LOCATE THE MESSAGE IN THE 833 PAGE DOCUMENT.   PLEASE PROVIDE THE WARNING NOTED.           ******************************************   BUILDING DATA FOR CO & REPORTING (INTERNAL USE ONLY)       USC-404 TYPE 105 - NEW:RES FIVE OR MORE UNITS   SQUARE FEET - 4964       CONSTRUCTION TYPE: 14-V-B - 5TH ED TYPE V-B   UNITS: 6   FLOORS: 1   BEDROOMS: 8   ROOMS: 22   SQ FT LIVABLE: 4964   SQ FT FOOTPRINT: 4964   SQ FT ROOF: 4964       SETBACKS FRONT (USE THIS TO ENTER VERTICAL DATUM IF   KNOWN):   SETBACKS BACK (USE THIS TO ENTER FIRST FLOOR IF KNOWN):   XX.XX   SETBACKS LEFT (USE THIS TO ENTER SECOND FLOOR IF KNOWN:   XX.XX   OCC LOAD: 26   PROP USE: APARTMENT   SPRINKLER SYS? Y   SPRK REQ'D? Y   BATHRMS: 8       BLDG CODE: FL 2014   OCC CLASS: 5TH ED R-2     Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) Rev No 5 Status F Date 2017-08-09 Cont ID   Sent By shill Date 2017-08-09 Time 08:44 Rev Time 0.00 Received By shill Date 2017-08-08 Time 09:24 Sent To   Notes 2017-08-09 08:55:59 ****CORRECTIONS****       SAMANTHA HILL   BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER   [email protected]   561-805-6724       FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014)   FBC B = FBC BUILDING   FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING   FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY   FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION       1. THE INDEX PAGE, A0.01 INDEX, HAS BEEN REPLACED BY   ANOTHER SHEET, A0.01 PROJECT DATA. THEREFORE, THE   PROJECT DATA SHEET IS IN THE PLAN TWICE, AND THE 402   PAGE PLAN NOW LACKS THE FIRST PAGE OF THE INDEX.       RESTORE THE INDEX PAGE.       PROVISO ITEMS - **DO NOT** ADDRESS AT THIS TIME.   ADDRESS AFTER PERMIT ISSUANCE.       A. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR SITE AMENITIES, POOL,   POOL DECK, FENCING, PAVING, SIDEWALKS, FIRE ALARM, FIRE   SPRINKLER, FIRE UNDERGROUND, PARKING LOT & STRIPING,   TEMPORARY TRAILER, CONSTRUCTION OFFICES, SIGNS.   SEPARATE PLANS, PERMITS, REVIEWS, AND FEES REQUIRED.       B. WORK AREAS TO COMPLY WITH FBC ACCESSIBILITY (FBC A   902.1 ADVISORY, ABA) PER ARCHITECT       C. FLOORING ACOUSTICAL INSULATION REQUIRED BY FBC 1207   IS TO COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING:       (1) FBC 1207.2, FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLIES SEPARATING   DWELLING UNITS FROM EACH OTHER OR FROM PUBLIC OR   SERVICE AREAS SHALL HAVE A SOUND TRANSMISSION CLASS   (STC) OF NOT LESS THAN 50 (45 IF FIELD TESTED) FOR AIR   BORNE NOISE WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 90.   PROVIDE A COPY OF THE TEST REPORT (WITHOUT A DROPPED   GYPSUM CEILING ASSEMBLY).   (2) FBC 1207.3, FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLIES BETWEEN   DWELLING UNITS OR BETWEEN A DWELLING UNIT AND A PUBLIC   OR SERVICE AREA WITHIN THE STRUCTURE SHALL HAVE AN   IMPACT INSULATION CLASS (IIC) RATING OF NOT LESS THAN   50 (45 IF FIELD TESTED) WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH   ASTM E 492. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE TEST REPORT (WITHOUT   A DROPPED GYPSUM CEILING ASSEMBLY).   (3) FBC 720.2, FLAME SPREAD INDEX OF NOT MORE THAN 25   AND SMOKE DEVELOPED INDEX OF NOT MORE THAN 450   REQUIRED. PROVIDE TEST DATA IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E   84 OR UL 723.       TEST REPORTS, REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF RECORD, ARE TO BE   SUBMITTED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.       D. PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL COMPONENTS   AND CLADDING, FBC 1609. PRODUCT APPROVALS, REVIEWED BY   DESIGNER OF RECORD, ARE TO BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO   INSTALLATION. COMPONENTS AND CLADDING ARE TO COMPLY   WITH THE DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN ON SHEET S0. THE   OPTIONS SELECTED ARE TO BE MARKED ON THE PRODUCT   APPROVALS PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL.       E. A SEPARATE ROOF PERMIT IS REQUIRED. THE PRODUCT   APPROVAL REVIEWED BY DOR IS TO BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO   INSTALLATION. THE APPROVED ASSEMBLY PROPOSED IS TO BE   INDICATED AND ENGINEERING, IF APPLICABLE, SUBMITTED.       F. CIVIL PAGES WERE NOT REVIEWED BY BUILDING; PAVING   WILL BE REVIEWED UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT.       G. FAIR HOUSING COMPLIANCE; SHEET A1.00 HAS A NOTE:   1 BED 75 UNITS WITH TYPE B BATH   2 BED 50 UNITS WITH ONE TYPE A AND ONE TYPE B PER FHA       H. SHORING/RESHORE PLANS AND ENGINEERING REVIEWED BY   CONTRACTOR AND SPECIAL INSPECTOR ARE TO BE SUBMITTED,   REVIEWED AND ISSUED (AS A "SUBMITTAL" TO THE BUILDING   DIVISION) PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. NO AFFECTED WORK TO   COMMENCE WITHOUT THE SHORING/RESHORE ENGINEERING ON   SITE, REVIEWED AND ISSUED BY BUILDING DIVISION.       I. A CONSTRUCTION GUARDRAIL DETAIL, PREPARED BY A   DESIGN PROFESSIONAL LICENSED UNDER FS471 OR FS481, IS   REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED, AND ISSUED BY THE   CITY. SUBJECT TO FIELD INSPECTOR'S DISCRETION, THIS MAY   BE ACCEPTED IN THE FIELD AT TIME OF INSPECTION.       J. FILES SUBMITTED UNDER PERMIT APPLICATION #16071058   WERE REVIEWED. PER APPLICANT, THE SAME PLANS WERE   SUBMITTED FOR PERMITS 16070880, 16070916, 16071059. THE   PLANS APPEAR IDENTICAL. ANY (BUILDING REVIEWED)   DISCREPANCIES ARE SUPERSEDED BY THE PLANS REVIEWED   UNDER 16071058.       K. REGARDING THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS:       PAGE 35, F27 SHOWS A 4TH FLOOR WOOD SLAB; CLARIFY.   PAGE 11 OF 109 AUTO WIND LOAD CALCULATION SHOWS BASIC   WIND SPEED AS 136MPH, BUT PAGE 9 OF 63 IS 170MPH. ONE   APPEARS TO BE VASD, THE OTHER APPEARS TO BE VULT, BUT I   CANNOT FIND WHERE IT STATES THIS, AND IT IS NOT CLEAR   WHY THEY WOULD BE DONE DIFFERENTLY.   PAGE 30 OF 109, TABLE 4.5 STEEL FRAME SUMMARY, ROOF   LABEL C46 HAS A STATUS OF "WARNING: SEE MESSAGE". I WAS   UNABLE TO LOCATE THE MESSAGE IN THE 833 PAGE DOCUMENT.   PLEASE PROVIDE THE WARNING NOTED.     Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) Rev No 4 Status F Date 2017-07-28 Cont ID   Sent By shill Date 2017-07-28 Time 10:32 Rev Time 0.00 Received By shill Date 2017-07-27 Time 17:51 Sent To   Notes 2017-07-28 10:32:16 ****CORRECTIONS****       SAMANTHA HILL   BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER   [email protected]   561-805-6724       FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014)   FBC B = FBC BUILDING   FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING   FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY   FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION       1. THIS FILE STILL HAS DUPLICATE RECORDS; DOCUMENTS   PREVIOUSLY DENIED AND RESUBMITTED DOCUMENTS WHICH   SHOULD HAVE SUPERSEDED THE DENIED DOCUMENTS (BUT ARE   NOW IN THE PERMIT RECORD TWICE - THE NON COMPLIANT ONE   AND THE CURRENT ONE).       FOR INSTANCE, SEE ENERGY CALCS - THERE IS ONE DATED   "BLDG 2 ENERGY CALCS SIGNED" DATED 7/18/17. THERE IS   ANOTHER ENERGY CALC FOR THE SAME BUILDING NAMED   "BUILDING 2 ENERGY SIGNED" DATED 12/5/16. THIS IS ONE   EXAMPLE; THERE ARE MORE DUPLICATES IN THE PERMIT   RECORD.       PLEASE COORDINATE WITH CAROLINE AND LAURA (DIGITAL   LIBRARIANS) TO CLEAN UP THE FOUR PERMITS PRIOR TO   ISSUANCE. ALL NEW FILES SHOULD BE NAMED IDENTICALLY TO   THE OLD DENIED DIGITAL FILE, SO WHEN UPLOADED IT   SUPERSEDES THE DENIED DOCUMENT.       THIS IS ONLY ONE EXAMPLE. THE SOILS REPORT IS IN THE   FILE THREE TIMES. PLEASE RETAIN ONLY THE MOST CURRENT   VERSION; FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES, THE TWO OTHERS APPEAR   UNNECESSARY. EITHER RENAME SO THEY CAN BE PROPERLY   VERSIONED (SUBSEQUENT VERSIONS OVERWRITING PREVIOUS   VERSIONS), OR HAVE THE DOCUMENTS NOT NEEDED REMOVED.       THE LARGE NUMBER OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS, WHICH ARE NOT   IN ANY PARTICULAR ORDER AND DO NOT HAVE A CONSISTENT   NAMING CONVENTION, MAKES IT VERY DIFFICULT TO LOCATE   INFORMATION.       2. STRUCTURAL CALCS WERE MADE AVAILABLE TO ME VIA   DROPBOX. I REQUESTED THAT THEY BE UPLOADED TO THE   PERMIT RECORD. BUILDING OFFICIAL AND I REVIEWED A   CALCULATION REPORT WHICH WAS 541 PAGES LONG (ALL   BUILDINGS), COVER PAGE ETABS 2016, DATED 11/27/16.   ENGINEER LATER SENT ADDITIONAL REPORTS WHICH INCLUDED   THE SLAB, GENERATED FROM OTHER SOFTWARE PROGRAMS. THIS   IS NOT WHAT IS NOW IN PROJECTDOX - THERE IS ONLY ONE   CALC REPORT IN THE FILE, 62 PAGES, ETABS 2013, BUILDING   3 ONLY, NAMED 8/10/16 BUT WITH A DATE ON THE COVER PAGE   OF 7/14/2017.       THE ISSUE IS NOT THAT THE REPORT HAS ONLY ONE BUILDING,   BUT THAT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL AND I SPENT CONSIDERABLE   TIME REVIEWING A REPORT SENT BY THE ENGINEER. THE   ENGINEER STATED THAT THE REPORT I FAILED PREVIOUSLY WAS   "THE WRONG REPORT". PLEASE COORDINATE WITH HIM TO   ENSURE THAT THE REPORTS UPLOADED ARE THE CORRECT   STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS.       ALSO, IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THE PLANS IN EACH   PERMIT ARE IDENTICAL AND HAS BEEN REVIEWED THIS WAY   (REVIEW DONE ON 16071058 ONLY, AS OTHER PERMITS SHOULD   HAVE THE SAME DOCUMENTS). IS THIS NO LONGER THE CASE?   PRIOR TO ISSUANCE, A CHECK WILL BE DONE TO VERIFY THAT   ALL FOUR PERMITS HAVE THE SAME DOCUMENTS. PLEASE ENSURE   THAT THIS IS THE CASE PRIOR TO NEXT REVIEW.       IF THE OTHER PERMITS DO NOT HAVE THE SAME DOCUMENTS AS   THIS ONE, PLEASE ADVISE SO ADDITIONAL REVIEW CAN BE   DONE.       3. PROVISO, A DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAIL WAS ADDED ON   SHEET A1.01A. THIS IS SUBJECT TO ENGINEERING   DEPARTMENT'S APPROVAL.       4. SEE PREVIOUS LIST, ITEM 13. A6.11, OTHER LOCATIONS,   PLANS STILL REFER TO JOHNSONITE PROFILE SLT-XX-C 2MM   QT-SCU UNDERLAYMENT. PREVIOUS LIST STATED TO EITHER   REMOVE THE REFERENCE TO SPECIFIC PRODUCTS OR PROVIDE   THE 3 TEST REPORTS (STC, IIC, FLAME SPREAD) AT THIS   TIME. TO MY KNOWLEDGE ONLY ONE PRODUCT HAS ALL THREE   TEST REPORTS, ANOTHER MANUFACTURER MAY BE HAVING THEIR   PRODUCT TESTED. SPECIFIC UNDERLAYMENT AND TEST REPORTS   CAN BE A PROVISO ITEM, BUT THE PERMIT WILL NOT BE   ISSUED WITH A SPECIFICATION FOR A PRODUCT FOR WHICH   CODE COMPLIANCE HAS NOT BEEN DEMONSTRATED. PLEASE   REMOVE REFERENCE TO SPECIFIC PRODUCT SO THAT THIS CAN   BE A PROVISO ITEM.       5. PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY SHEET S-B1-2.3 AND OTHER S SHEETS   WERE REVISED. DOES THE STRUCTURAL CHANGE REQUIRE NEW   CALCULATIONS? IT IS SUGGESTED THAT ANY ADDITIONAL VE BE   DONE AFTER PERMIT ISSUANCE, AS A REVISION, TO AVOID NEW   COMMENTS.       PENDING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (NARRATIVE FOR   STRUCTURAL CHANGES, COMPLETE CALCULATIONS)       6. APPLICANT MAY CONSIDER APPLYING FOR A FOUNDATION   PERMIT TO MAINTAIN CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE, IF DESIRED.             Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) Rev No 3 Status F Date 2017-07-12 Cont ID   Sent By shill Date 2017-07-12 Time 12:47 Rev Time 0.00 Received By shill Date 2017-07-12 Time 12:47 Sent To   Notes 2017-07-12 12:49:48 ****CORRECTIONS****   IF ALL OTHER TRADES PASS REVIEW, PLEASE CONTACT ME   REGARDING A POSSIBLE PROVISO       SAMANTHA HILL   BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER   [email protected]   561-805-6724       THIS PERMIT INCLUDES FOUR BUILDINGS:       PERMIT #16070916 906 17TH STREET - 68 UNITS, 4 STORIES   (BUILDING 1) THRESHOLD BUILDING   PERMIT #16071059 808 17TH STREET - 45 UNITS, 3 STORIES   (BUILDING 2)   PERMIT #16071058 811 15TH STREET - 6 UNITS, 1 STORY   (BUILDING 3)   PERMIT #16070880 805 15TH STREET - 6 UNITS, 1 STORY   (BUILDING 4)       ALL FOUR BUILDINGS WILL BE REVIEWED UNDER THIS PERMIT   NUMBER.       COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW, NOT ADDRESSED:       1-10. OK       11. FS471, FBC CHAPTER 16, THE STRUCTURAL REPORT DATED   8.10.2016 HAS AN INVALID DIGITAL SIGNATURE, HOWEVER, IT   APPEARS THAT THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN HAS CHANGED. ALSO,   THE STRUCTURAL REPORT PREVIOUSLY UPLOADED HAS ERRORS   (FOR EXAMPLES SEE SHEETS 145, 146, "SHEAR STRESS DUE TO   SHEAR FORCE AND TORSION TOGETHER EXCEEDS MAXIMUM   ALLOWED").       PROVIDE UPDATED REPORT CONSISTENT WITH NEW STRUCTURAL   DESIGN, CONFIRM THERE ARE NO ERROR MESSAGES IN THE   REPORT PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL, OR EXPLAIN WHY ANY ERROR   MESSAGES ARE NOT RELEVANT.       3RD REVIEW, THE SAME REPORT WAS PROVIDED (WITH A VALID   SIGNATURE & SEAL). THEREFORE, THE SAME ERRORS ARE IN   THE REPORT. THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN CHANGED AFTER THIS   REPORT WAS PREPARED; IT APPEARS THAT A NEW REPORT IS   REQUIRED. REPORT SHOWS AN 8" SLAB (SEE TABLE 2.2 SHELL   SECTIONS SUMMARY), PLAN WAS REVISED TO 6". COLUMN AND   FOOTING LOCATIONS AND SIZES WERE REVISED.       12. FBC B 1803, FS471, PROVIDE THE SIGNED AND SEALED   SOILS REPORT PREPARED BY ARDAMAN & ASSOCIATES 3/28/16.       3RD REVIEW, THIS REPORT HAS BEEN UPLOADED TWICE BUT IS   NOT DIGITALLY OR ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED AND SEALED. A   PAPER ORIGINAL MAY BE SUBMITTED, OR A DIGITALLY OR   ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED AND SEALED REPORT CAN BE UPLOADED   TO PROJECTDOX.       13. SEE PREVIOUS LIST REGARDING THE THREE TEST REPORTS   REQUIRED FOR FLOORING UNDERLAYMENT. SHEET A6.11, 6.12   (AND POSSIBLY OTHER PAGES) SPECS ARDEX SD-P AND QT-SCU   UNDERLAYMENT. EITHER REMOVE THE NOTE OR PROVIDE THE   THREE TEST REPORTS AT THIS TIME. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT   THE NOTE BE REMOVED BUT INCORPORATE THE REQUIREMENT FOR   THE THREE TEST REPORTS TO BE SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED   PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.       3RD REVIEW, NOT ADDRESSED.       14-17. OK       18. SEE IMPACT FEE REVIEW.       19-21. OK       22-30. OK       WOOD TRUSSES ARE PROPOSED OVER THE CONCRETE ROOF. FOR   BUILDINGS 1 AND 2, WHICH ARE TYPE IIA BUILDINGS, REVISE   PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC B 603.       31. THIS PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH PROVISOS (DO NOT   ADDRESS AT THIS TIME):       A. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR SITE AMENITIES, POOL,   POOL DECK, FENCING, PAVING, SIDEWALKS, FIRE ALARM, FIRE   SPRINKLER, FIRE UNDERGROUND, PARKING LOT & STRIPING,   TEMPORARY TRAILER, CONSTRUCTION OFFICES, SIGNS.   SEPARATE PLANS, PERMITS, REVIEWS, AND FEES REQUIRED.       B. WORK AREAS TO COMPLY WITH FBC ACCESSIBILITY (FBC A   902.1 ADVISORY, ABA) PER ARCHITECT       C. FLOORING ACOUSTICAL INSULATION REQUIRED BY FBC 1207   IS TO COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING:       (1) FBC 1207.2, FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLIES SEPARATING   DWELLING UNITS FROM EACH OTHER OR FROM PUBLIC OR   SERVICE AREAS SHALL HAVE A SOUND TRANSMISSION CLASS   (STC) OF NOT LESS THAN 50 (45 IF FIELD TESTED) FOR AIR   BORNE NOISE WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 90.   PROVIDE A COPY OF THE TEST REPORT (WITHOUT A DROPPED   GYPSUM CEILING ASSEMBLY).   (2) FBC 1207.3, FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLIES BETWEEN   DWELLING UNITS OR BETWEEN A DWELLING UNIT AND A PUBLIC   OR SERVICE AREA WITHIN THE STRUCTURE SHALL HAVE AN   IMPACT INSULATION CLASS (IIC) RATING OF NOT LESS THAN   50 (45 IF FIELD TESTED) WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH   ASTM E 492. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE TEST REPORT (WITHOUT   A DROPPED GYPSUM CEILING ASSEMBLY).   (3) FBC 720.2, FLAME SPREAD INDEX OF NOT MORE THAN 25   AND SMOKE DEVELOPED INDEX OF NOT MORE THAN 450   REQUIRED. PROVIDE TEST DATA IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E   84 OR UL 723.       TEST REPORTS, REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF RECORD, ARE TO BE   SUBMITTED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.       D. PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL COMPONENTS   AND CLADDING, FBC 1609. PRODUCT APPROVALS, REVIEWED BY   DESIGNER OF RECORD, ARE TO BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO   INSTALLATION. COMPONENTS AND CLADDING ARE TO COMPLY   WITH THE DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN ON SHEET S0. THE   OPTIONS SELECTED ARE TO BE MARKED ON THE PRODUCT   APPROVALS PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL.       E. A SEPARATE ROOF PERMIT IS REQUIRED. THE PRODUCT   APPROVAL REVIEWED BY DOR IS TO BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO   INSTALLATION. THE APPROVED ASSEMBLY PROPOSED IS TO BE   INDICATED AND ENGINEERING, IF APPLICABLE, SUBMITTED.       F. CIVIL PAGES WERE NOT REVIEWED BY BUILDING; PAVING   WILL BE REVIEWED UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT.       G. FAIR HOUSING COMPLIANCE; SHEET A1.00 HAS A NOTE:   1 BED 75 UNITS WITH TYPE B BATH   2 BED 50 UNITS WITH ONE TYPE A AND ONE TYPE B PER FHA       H. SHORING/RESHORE PLANS AND ENGINEERING REVIEWED BY   CONTRACTOR AND SPECIAL INSPECTOR ARE TO BE SUBMITTED,   REVIEWED AND ISSUED (AS A "SUBMITTAL" TO THE BUILDING   DIVISION) PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. NO AFFECTED WORK TO   COMMENCE WITHOUT THE SHORING/RESHORE ENGINEERING ON   SITE, REVIEWED AND ISSUED BY BUILDING DIVISION.       I. A CONSTRUCTION GUARDRAIL DETAIL, PREPARED BY A   DESIGN PROFESSIONAL LICENSED UNDER FS471 OR FS481, IS   REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED, AND ISSUED BY THE   CITY. SUBJECT TO FIELD INSPECTOR'S DISCRETION, THIS MAY   BE ACCEPTED IN THE FIELD AT TIME OF INSPECTION.       ******************************************   BUILDING DATA FOR CO & REPORTING (INTERNAL USE ONLY)       USC-404 TYPE 105 - NEW:RES FIVE OR MORE UNITS   SQUARE FEET - 4964       CONSTRUCTION TYPE: 14-V-B - 5TH ED TYPE V-B   UNITS: 6   FLOORS: 1   BEDROOMS: 8   ROOMS: 22   SQ FT LIVABLE: 4964   SQ FT FOOTPRINT: 4964   SQ FT ROOF: 4964       SETBACKS FRONT (USE THIS TO ENTER VERTICAL DATUM IF   KNOWN):   SETBACKS BACK (USE THIS TO ENTER FIRST FLOOR IF KNOWN):   XX.XX   SETBACKS LEFT (USE THIS TO ENTER SECOND FLOOR IF KNOWN:   XX.XX   OCC LOAD: 26   PROP USE: APARTMENT   SPRINKLER SYS? Y   SPRK REQ'D? Y   BATHRMS: 8       BLDG CODE: FL 2014   OCC CLASS: 5TH ED R-2         Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) Rev No 2 Status F Date 2017-06-23 Cont ID   Sent By shill Date 2017-06-23 Time 09:51 Rev Time 0.00 Received By shill Date 2017-06-21 Time 16:48 Sent To   Notes 2017-06-23 09:54:25 ****CORRECTIONS****       SAMANTHA HILL   BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER   [email protected]   561-805-6724       THIS PERMIT INCLUDES FOUR BUILDINGS:       PERMIT #16070916 906 17TH STREET - 68 UNITS, 4 STORIES   (BUILDING 1) THRESHOLD BUILDING   PERMIT #16071059 808 17TH STREET - 45 UNITS, 3 STORIES   (BUILDING 2)   PERMIT #16071058 811 15TH STREET - 6 UNITS, 1 STORY   (BUILDING 3)   PERMIT #16070880 805 15TH STREET - 6 UNITS, 1 STORY   (BUILDING 4)       ALL FOUR BUILDINGS WILL BE REVIEWED UNDER THIS PERMIT   NUMBER.       1. FA1.00A (AND POSSIBLY OTHER PLACES) GOVERNING CODE   IS INCORRECT, REVISE AND CHECK ALL SHEETS.       2-9. OK       10. REVISE PLAN TO ADDRESS PLUMBING ACCESSIBILITY   COMMENTS WHICH ARE ALSO APPLICABLE FOR BUILDING REVIEW,   FBC 5TH EDITION ACCESSIBILITY.       11. FS471, FBC CHAPTER 16, THE STRUCTURAL REPORT DATED   8.10.2016 HAS AN INVALID DIGITAL SIGNATURE, HOWEVER, IT   APPEARS THAT THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN HAS CHANGED. ALSO,   THE STRUCTURAL REPORT PREVIOUSLY UPLOADED HAS ERRORS   (FOR EXAMPLES SEE SHEETS 145, 146, "SHEAR STRESS DUE TO   SHEAR FORCE AND TORSION TOGETHER EXCEEDS MAXIMUM   ALLOWED").       PROVIDE UPDATED REPORT CONSISTENT WITH NEW STRUCTURAL   DESIGN, CONFIRM THERE ARE NO ERROR MESSAGES IN THE   REPORT PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL, OR EXPLAIN WHY ANY ERROR   MESSAGES ARE NOT RELEVANT.       12. FBC B 1803, FS471, PROVIDE THE SIGNED AND SEALED   SOILS REPORT PREPARED BY ARDAMAN & ASSOCIATES 3/28/16.       13. SEE PREVIOUS LIST REGARDING THE THREE TEST REPORTS   REQUIRED FOR FLOORING UNDERLAYMENT. SHEET A6.11, 6.12   (AND POSSIBLY OTHER PAGES) SPECS ARDEX SD-P AND QT-SCU   UNDERLAYMENT. EITHER REMOVE THE NOTE OR PROVIDE THE   THREE TEST REPORTS AT THIS TIME. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT   THE NOTE BE REMOVED BUT INCORPORATE THE REQUIREMENT FOR   THE THREE TEST REPORTS TO BE SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED   PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.       14. OK       16. 16070916 (BUILDING 1) IS A THRESHOLD BUILDING,   FS553.79(7)(D). ALL PLANS FOR THE BUILDING WHICH ARE   REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE ARCHITECT OR   ENGINEER OF RECORD CONTAIN A STATEMENT THAT, TO THE   BEST OF THE ARCHITECT'S OR ENGINEER'S KNOWLEDGE, THE   PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE   MINIMUM BUILDING CODES AND THE APPLICABLE FIRESAFETY   STANDARDS AS DETERMINED BY THE LOCAL AUTHORITY IN   ACCORDANCE WITH THIS CHAPTER AND CHAPTER 633.       2ND REVIEW, ENGINEER'S RESPONSE IS THAT THIS IS ON   SHEET S0, UNABLE TO LOCATE. PLEASE CLOUD ALL CHANGES   FBC 107. THIS STATEMENT IS REQUIRED BY THE ARCHITECT   AND BY THE ENGINEER FOR BUILDING 1.       17. THRESHOLD INSPECTION PLAN REQUIRED, FS 553.79.       RESPONSE STATES THIS IS ATTACHED, UNABLE TO LOCATE.       18. SEE IMPACT FEE REVIEW.       19. VALUE HAS BEEN ADJUSTED PER ICC TABLES, FBC 109.   WHEN AVAILABLE, PROVIDE A COPY OF THE CONTRACT FOR THIS   JOB VIA EMAIL OR AT TIME OF RESUBMITTAL.       20. OK       21. A8.00, CLUB ROOM DOORS TO HAVE PANIC OR FIRE EXIT   HARDWARE, 1008.1.10. THE HARDWARE REQUIREMENT IS   APPLICABLE FOR ALL DOORS IN THE MEANS OF EGRESS.       2ND REVIEW, I WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE DOOR LABELS. SEE   A8.00, ONLY ONE DOOR (6A) HAS PANIC HARDWARE NOTE 19,   BUT CLUB ROOM IS ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY AND HAS TWO EXITS   (ONE DOUBLE DOOR, ONE SINGLE DOOR). REVISE AND CLARIFY.       22-30. OK       NEW COMMENTS:       PROJECT DATA A0.01, TRAVEL DISTANCE FOR RESIDENTIAL   SHOULD BE 250' MAX PER FBC B TABLE 1016.2; PLAN APPEARS   TO COMPLY BUT PLEASE CORRECT THE TABLE (325' STATED AS   MAX).       WOOD TRUSSES ARE PROPOSED OVER THE CONCRETE ROOF. FOR   BUILDINGS 1 AND 2, WHICH ARE TYPE IIA BUILDINGS, REVISE   PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC B 603.       31. THIS PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH PROVISOS (DO NOT   ADDRESS AT THIS TIME):       A. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR SITE AMENITIES, POOL,   POOL DECK, FENCING, PAVING, SIDEWALKS, FIRE ALARM, FIRE   SPRINKLER, FIRE UNDERGROUND, PARKING LOT & STRIPING,   TEMPORARY TRAILER, CONSTRUCTION OFFICES, SIGNS.   SEPARATE PLANS, PERMITS, REVIEWS, AND FEES REQUIRED.       B. WORK AREAS TO COMPLY WITH FBC ACCESSIBILITY (FBC A   902.1 ADVISORY, ABA) PER ARCHITECT       C. FLOORING ACOUSTICAL INSULATION REQUIRED BY FBC 1207   IS TO COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING:       (1) FBC 1207.2, FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLIES SEPARATING   DWELLING UNITS FROM EACH OTHER OR FROM PUBLIC OR   SERVICE AREAS SHALL HAVE A SOUND TRANSMISSION CLASS   (STC) OF NOT LESS THAN 50 (45 IF FIELD TESTED) FOR AIR   BORNE NOISE WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 90.   PROVIDE A COPY OF THE TEST REPORT (WITHOUT A DROPPED   GYPSUM CEILING ASSEMBLY).   (2) FBC 1207.3, FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLIES BETWEEN   DWELLING UNITS OR BETWEEN A DWELLING UNIT AND A PUBLIC   OR SERVICE AREA WITHIN THE STRUCTURE SHALL HAVE AN   IMPACT INSULATION CLASS (IIC) RATING OF NOT LESS THAN   50 (45 IF FIELD TESTED) WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH   ASTM E 492. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE TEST REPORT (WITHOUT   A DROPPED GYPSUM CEILING ASSEMBLY).   (3) FBC 720.2, FLAME SPREAD INDEX OF NOT MORE THAN 25   AND SMOKE DEVELOPED INDEX OF NOT MORE THAN 450   REQUIRED. PROVIDE TEST DATA IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E   84 OR UL 723.       TEST REPORTS, REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF RECORD, ARE TO BE   SUBMITTED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.       D. PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL COMPONENTS   AND CLADDING, FBC 1609. PRODUCT APPROVALS, REVIEWED BY   DESIGNER OF RECORD, ARE TO BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO   INSTALLATION. COMPONENTS AND CLADDING ARE TO COMPLY   WITH THE DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN ON SHEET S0. THE   OPTIONS SELECTED ARE TO BE MARKED ON THE PRODUCT   APPROVALS PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL.       E. A SEPARATE ROOF PERMIT IS REQUIRED. THE PRODUCT   APPROVAL REVIEWED BY DOR IS TO BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO   INSTALLATION. THE APPROVED ASSEMBLY PROPOSED IS TO BE   INDICATED AND ENGINEERING, IF APPLICABLE, SUBMITTED.       F. CIVIL PAGES WERE NOT REVIEWED BY BUILDING; PAVING   WILL BE REVIEWED UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT.       G. FAIR HOUSING COMPLIANCE; SHEET A1.00 HAS A NOTE:   1 BED 75 UNITS WITH TYPE B BATH   2 BED 50 UNITS WITH ONE TYPE A AND ONE TYPE B PER FHA       H. SHORING/RESHORE PLANS AND ENGINEERING REVIEWED BY   CONTRACTOR AND SPECIAL INSPECTOR ARE TO BE SUBMITTED,   REVIEWED AND ISSUED (AS A "SUBMITTAL" TO THE BUILDING   DIVISION) PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. NO AFFECTED WORK TO   COMMENCE WITHOUT THE SHORING/RESHORE ENGINEERING ON   SITE, REVIEWED AND ISSUED BY BUILDING DIVISION.       I. A CONSTRUCTION GUARDRAIL DETAIL, PREPARED BY A   DESIGN PROFESSIONAL LICENSED UNDER FS471 OR FS481, IS   REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED, AND ISSUED BY THE   CITY. SUBJECT TO FIELD INSPECTOR'S DISCRETION, THIS MAY   BE ACCEPTED IN THE FIELD AT TIME OF INSPECTION.                   ******************************   INFORMATION FOR C.O.:       16071058 BLDG 3   USC-404 TYPE 105 - NEW:RES FIVE OR MORE UNITS   SQUARE FEET - 4964       CONSTRUCTION TYPE: 14-V-B - 5TH ED TYPE V-B   UNITS: 6   FLOORS: 1   BEDROOMS: 8   ROOMS: 22   SQ FT LIVABLE: 4964   SQ FT FOOTPRINT: 4964   SQ FT ROOF: 4964       OCC LOAD: 26   PROP USE: APARTMENT   SPRINKLER SYS? Y   SPRK REQ'D? Y   BATHRMS: 8       BLDG CODE: FL 2014   OCC CLASS: 5TH ED R-2     Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) Rev No 1 Status F Date 2016-10-05 Cont ID   Sent By shill Date 2016-10-05 Time 08:01 Rev Time 0.00 Received By shill Date 2016-10-03 Time 09:43 Sent To   Notes 2016-10-05 08:02:04 ****CORRECTIONS****       SAMANTHA HILL   BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER   [email protected]   561-805-6724       THIS PERMIT INCLUDES FOUR BUILDINGS:       PERMIT #16070916 906 17TH STREET - 68 UNITS (BUILDING   1)   PERMIT #16071059 808 17TH STREET - 45 UNITS (BUILDING   2)   PERMIT #16071058 811 15TH STREET - 6 UNITS, 1 STORY   (BUILDING 3)   PERMIT #16070880 805 15TH STREET - 6 UNITS, 1 STORY   (BUILDING 4)       ALL FOUR BUILDINGS WILL BE REVIEWED UNDER THIS PERMIT   NUMBER.       1. A0.01, FA1.00A (AND OTHER PLACES) GOVERNING CODE IS   INCORRECT, REVISE AND CHECK ALL SHEETS.       2. A0.01 INCLUDES ONLY R2 OCCUPANCY WHEN SHOWING   COMPLIANCE WITH BUILDING HEIGHT AND AREA. REVISE PLAN   TO INCLUDE THE BUSINESS AND ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCIES.   REVISE PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC TABLE 503.       3. A0.01 FBC 508 BUILDING 2 IS A MIXED OCCUPANCY   BUILDING. INDICATE WHETHER THIS IS SEPARATED OR NON   SEPARATED MIXED USE.       4. A0.01 TRAVEL DISTANCE DOES NOT INCLUDE ASSEMBLY   OCCUPANCIES IN THE TABLE, REVISE, FBC 1016.       5. COMPLIANCE WITH FBC 5TH EDITION ACCESSIBILITY, FAIR   HOUSING IS NOT CLEAR. IF USING THE FAIR HOUSING DESIGN   MANUAL, REVISE PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH   SPECIFICATION A, SPECIFICATION B, NUMBER OF EACH.       6. A1.00, COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCESSIBLE   PARKING SPACES IS NOT CLEAR. PLANS STATE COMPLIANCE   WITH ADA, BUT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE PARKING REQUIRED   BY FBC ACCESSIBILITY 208.2.       REVISE PLAN TO CLEARLY INDICATE WHICH SPACES SERVE THE   AMENITY, RESIDENTIAL, LEASING, AMENITY, EMPLOYEES.   PROVIDE THE NUMBER FOR EACH AS WELL AS NUMBER OF   ACCESSIBLE SPACES FOR THE SEPARATE USES. LEASING OFFICE   TO COMPLY WITH ADA, RESIDENTIAL TO COMPLY WITH FHA   UNLESS DESIGNER IS OPTING FOR ADA AS AN ALTERNATE   DESIGN METHOD (IN WHICH CASE, NOT ENOUGH ACCESSIBLE   PARKING IS PROVIDED). AT THIS POINT IT IS DIFFICULT TO   DETERMINE REQUIREMENTS DUE TO LACK OF FAIR HOUSING   INFORMATION.       7. GENERAL COMMENT RE WORK AREAS, FBC ACCESSIBILITY   902.1 ADVISORY, ABA ALSO APPLIES TO FACILITIES   DESIGNED, BUILT, ALTERED, OR LEASED WITH FEDERAL FUNDS.   EITHER CONFIRM COMPLIANCE OR CONFIRM NO FEDERAL FUNDS   WERE USED. THIS MAY BE ADDRESSED IN THE RESPONSE   LETTER.       8. S0 HAS TEXT WHICH IS ILLEGIBLE (DESIGN CRITERIA),   REVISE.       9. SB3 2.1 IS NAMED CORRECTLY (ROOF) BUT THE DETAIL IS   LABLED GROUND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN, REVISE, FBC 107.       10. REVISE PLAN TO ADDRESS PLUMBING ACCESSIBILITY   COMMENTS WHICH ARE ALSO APPLICABLE FOR BUILDING REVIEW,   FBC 5TH EDITION ACCESSIBILITY.       11. FS471, FBC 1609, THE STRUCTURAL REPORT DATED   8.10.2016 HAS AN INVALID DIGITAL SIGNATURE, UPLOAD A   CORRECTLY SIGNED AND SEALED REPORT.       12. FBC 1803, PROVIDE THE SIGNED AND SEALED SOILS   REPORT PREPARED BY ARDAMAN & ASSOCIATES 3/28/16. IT IS   INCLUDED IN THE STRUCTURAL REPORT BUT THE SOILS REPORT   NEEDS TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE ENGINEER ON THE   SOILS REPORT TITLE BLOCK, FS 471.       13. FLOORING ACOUSTICAL INSULATION REQUIRED BY FBC 1207   IS TO COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING:       A. FBC 1207.2, FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLIES SEPARATING   DWELLING UNITS FROM EACH OTHER OR FROM PUBLIC OR   SERVICE AREAS SHALL HAVE A SOUND TRANSMISSION CLASS   (STC) OF NOT LESS THAN 50 (45 IF FIELD TESTED) FOR AIR   BORNE NOISE WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 90.   PROVIDE A COPY OF THE TEST REPORT (WITHOUT A DROPPED   GYPSUM CEILING ASSEMBLY).       B. FBC 1207.3, FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLIES BETWEEN   DWELLING UNITS OR BETWEEN A DWELLING UNIT AND A PUBLIC   OR SERVICE AREA WITHIN THE STRUCTURE SHALL HAVE AN   IMPACT INSULATION CLASS (IIC) RATING OF NOT LESS THAN   50 (45 IF FIELD TESTED) WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH   ASTM E 492. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE TEST REPORT (WITHOUT   A DROPPED GYPSUM CEILING ASSEMBLY).       C. FBC 720.2, FLAME SPREAD INDEX OF NOT MORE THAN 25   AND SMOKE DEVELOPED INDEX OF NOT MORE THAN 450   REQUIRED. PROVIDE TEST DATA IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E   84 OR UL 723.       THIS MAY BE A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL UPON REQUEST. TEST   REPORTS, REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF RECORD, ARE TO BE   SUBMITTED AS A REVISION PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.       14. PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL COMPONENTS   AND CLADDING, FBC 1609. THIS MAY BE A DEFERRED   SUBMITTAL UPON REQUEST. PRODUCT APPROVALS, REVIEWED BY   DESIGNER OF RECORD, ARE TO BE SUBMITTED AS A REVISION   PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. COMPONENTS AND CLADDING ARE TO   COMPLY WITH THE DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN ON SHEET S0. THE   OPTIONS SELECTED ARE TO BE MARKED ON THE PRODUCT   APPROVALS PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL.       15. A SEPARATE ROOF PERMIT IS REQUIRED. IF THIS   SUBMITTAL IS DEFERRED, THE PRODUCT APPROVAL REVIEWED BY   DOR IS TO BE SUBMITTED AS A REVISION PRIOR TO   INSTALLATION. THE APPROVED ASSEMBLY PROPOSED IS TO BE   INDICATED AND ENGINEERING, IF APPLICABLE, SUBMITTED.       16. 16070916 (BUILDING 1) IS A THRESHOLD BUILDING,   FS553.79(7)(D). ALL PLANS FOR THE BUILDING WHICH ARE   REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE ARCHITECT OR   ENGINEER OF RECORD CONTAIN A STATEMENT THAT, TO THE   BEST OF THE ARCHITECT?S OR ENGINEER?S KNOWLEDGE, THE   PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE   MINIMUM BUILDING CODES AND THE APPLICABLE FIRESAFETY   STANDARDS AS DETERMINED BY THE LOCAL AUTHORITY IN   ACCORDANCE WITH THIS CHAPTER AND CHAPTER 633.       CONFIRM ALL APPLICABLE PAGES INCLUDE THE REQUIRED   STATEMENT.       17. THRESHOLD INSPECTION PLAN REQUIRED, FS 553.79.       18. SEE IMPACT FEE REVIEW.       19. VALUE HAS BEEN ADJUSTED PER ICC TABLES, FBC 109.   WHEN AVAILABLE, PROVIDE A COPY OF THE CONTRACT FOR THIS   JOB VIA EMAIL OR AT TIME OF RESUBMITTAL.       20. FBC 107, FOR INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR C.O., PROVIDE   A TOTAL PER BUILDING:       ROOMS   BATHROOMS   BEDROOMS       21. A8.00, CLUB ROOM DOORS TO SWING IN THE DIRECTION OF   EGRESS TRAVEL AND TO HAVE PANIC OR FIRE EXIT HARDWARE,   1008.1.10. THE HARDWARE REQUIREMENT IS APPLICABLE FOR   ALL DOORS IN THE MEANS OF EGRESS. REVISE DOOR SCHEDULE   TO CLARIFY.       22. FBC 603, BUILDINGS 1 AND 2, IT IS NOT CLEAR UNDER   WHAT EXEMPTION THE COMBUSTBLE OUTLOOKERS ARE PROPOSED,   A3.00 AND OTHER SHEETS. SEE ALSO FBC 1406.       23. FBC 603, SHEETS A3.00, 3.01, BUILDINGS 1 AND 2, FBC   603.1(3), NOTE COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS FOR FOAM   PLASTICS FOR THE FOAM COLUMNS (OR REVISE PLAN TO SHOW   APPLICABLE EXEMPTION).       24. A2.05, THE WALL BETWEEN UNIT AND AMENITIES LACK THE   WALL TAG, FBC 107.       A0.01 INDICATES THAT BUILDINGS 3 AND 4 WILL BE   SPRINKLERED, BUT I WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE FIRE SPRINKLER   PLANS FOR THESE BUILDINGS, FBC 107, 903.2.8.       25. S 0, WIND DESIGN CRITERIA INCLUDES HVHZ. THIS   PROJECT IS NOT LOCATED IN HIGH VELOCITY, REMOVE NOTE.   PLEASE NOTE THAT HIGH VELOCITY IS NOT MORE STRINGENT   THAN NON HVHZ IN ALL CASES. THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF   THE FBC NON HVHZ ARE TO BE MET OR EXCEEDED.       26. ENERGY CALCS REQUIRED FBC 5TH EDITION ENERGY   CONSERVATION C103 (BUILDING 1), R103 (BUILDINGS 2, 3,   4).       27. A1.00, LEGEND 10 REFERS TO THE WRONG BUILDING CODE   AND ALSO REFERS TO ASCE 7 10. CLARIFY; IS THE POOL   FENCE TO RESIST WIND LOADS? IF SO, WHAT WIND LOADS?       28. A1.00, FBC 107, FBC 1004, OCCUPANT LOAD NOT SHOWN   FOR THE POOL DECK AREA. FBC TABLE 1004, POOL DECK IS TO   BE CALCULATED AT 15 SF PER PERSON, POOL SURFACE AT 50   SF. IT APPEARS THAT THE OCCUPANT LOAD WILL EXCEED 50.       29. A1.00, POOL GATES ARE TO COMPLY WITH THE   REQUIREMENTS FOR DOORS, FBC 1008.2. THE FOLLOWING IS   REQUIRED:   SWING IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS TRAVEL   INCLUDE PANIC OR FIRE EXIT HARDWARE   SWING AWAY FROM THE POOL AND COMPLY WITH ALL   REQUIREMENTS OF FBC 454.2.17.1.8   THE TWO PAIRS OF GATES ARE NOT REMOTELY LOCATED AS   REQUIRED BY       30. CLARIFY DOOR AND GATE OBSTRUCTION INTO THE EGRESS   PATH BETWEEN THE FOOD PREP ROOM AND POOL DECK, FBC 107.       31. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR SITE AMENITIES, POOL,   POOL DECK, FENCING, PAVING, SIDEWALKS, FIRE ALARM, FIRE   SPRINKLER, FIRE UNDERGROUND, PARKING LOT & STRIPING,   TEMPORARY TRAILER, CONSTRUCTION OFFICES, SIGNS.   SEPARATE PLANS, PERMITS, REVIEWS, AND FEES REQUIRED.     Review Stop E ELECTRICAL Rev No 5 Status P Date 2017-08-10 Cont ID   Sent By jpearson Date 2017-08-10 Time 13:28 Rev Time 0.00 Received By jpearson Date 2017-08-10 Time 13:28 Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop E ELECTRICAL Rev No 4 Status P Date 2017-07-21 Cont ID   Sent By jpearson Date 2017-07-21 Time 07:51 Rev Time 0.00 Received By jpearson Date 2017-07-21 Time 07:51 Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop E ELECTRICAL Rev No 3 Status P Date 2017-07-12 Cont ID   Sent By jpearson Date 2017-07-12 Time 13:42 Rev Time 0.00 Received By jpearson Date 2017-07-12 Time 13:42 Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop E ELECTRICAL Rev No 2 Status P Date 2017-06-16 Cont ID   Sent By jpearson Date 2017-06-16 Time 08:23 Rev Time 0.00 Received By jpearson Date 2017-06-16 Time 08:23 Sent To   Notes 2017-06-16 08:24:40 APPROVED WITH EXCEPTION. NEED AIC CALCULATIONS FOR EACH   SERVICE PRIOR TO ROUGH INSPECTION TO CONFIRM SIZING OF   SERVICE EQUIPMENT. NEC 110.9, 110.10   REVIEWED PER PREVIOUS COMMENTS ONLY, WITH ASSISTANCE   FROM JAKE LEAHY. Review Stop E ELECTRICAL Rev No 1 Status F Date 2016-08-29 Cont ID   Sent By vperez Date 2016-08-29 Time 09:33 Rev Time 0.00 Received By vperez Date 2016-08-26 Time 14:05 Sent To   Notes 2016-08-29 09:37:25 INITIAL ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW       APPLICABLE CODES IN EFFECT:   FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2014 5TH EDITION   FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ENERGY CONSERVATION 2014 5TH   EDITION   NFPA 70- 2011   COMMENTS:       1. E1.00-1.01- GENERAL NOTES TO CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS:   PLEASE PROVIDE A BLOCK NOTE INDICATING THE REQUIRED   SEPARATE PERMITS AND DATA SPECIFICATION SHEET   SUBMITTALS FOR ALL SITE LIGHTING AND ASSOCIATED   EQUIPMENT, ALL LOW VOLTAGE SYSTEMS TO INCLUDE BUT NOT   LIMITED TO FIRE ALARM, ACCESS CONTROLS (GATES), CCTV,   PHONE AND DATA, WIRELESS SYSTEMS, ETC. A NOTE WILL   SUFFICE.   2. PROVIDE A SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC EC 405.7.3,   405.7.4 SEE VERBIAGE IN THE CODE REGARDING VOLTAGE DROP   AND COMPLETIONS DOCUMENTS.   3. E1.00- PROVIDE A NOTE TO POOL TO BE UNDER SEPARATE   PERMIT.   4. E1.02- DELETE REFERENCE TO MIAMI DADE COUNTY   STANDARDS FOR LIGHTING ILLUMINATION PARKING AREA.   5. PLEASE ADDRESS FIRE COMMENTS RELATED TO EM LIGHTING   REQUIREMENTS.   6. PLEASE SHOW AIC CALCULATION BASED ON INFORMATION   PROVIDED BY FPL UTILITY FOR APPROVAL. NEC 110.24 FBC   107.   7. PROVIDE GENERAL NOTES TO ELECTRICAL RISER DIAGRAM TO   INDICATE NEC 110.16. ARC FLASH WARNING SIGNS AND NEC   110.24- AVAILABLE FAULT CURRENT- FIELD MARKINGS; SEE   VERBIAGE IN CODE.   8. PLEASE CLARIFY FIRE PUMP REFERENCE ON RISER DIAGRAM   FOR A COMPLETE REVIEW. FBC 107.3.5   9. COMMENTS MAY FOLLOW UPON RE-REVIEW. PLEASE FEEL FREE   TO CONTACT ME SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY           VALENTINO PEREZ   ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER II   561-805-6717   [email protected]         Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD Rev No 3 Status N Date 2017-07-18 Cont ID   Sent By SQ Date 2017-07-17 Time 09:02 Rev Time 0.00 Received By squinone Date 2017-07-18 Time 09:02 Sent To I Notes 2017-07-18 14:59:52 NO CIVIL SHEETS PROVIDED. PROJECT UNDER REVIEW THROUGH   ENGINEERING SERVICES. 2017-07-18 09:03:07 PROVIDE STATUS OF E16120006   ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL REQUIRED PRIOR TO   PERMIT ISSUANCE         Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD Rev No 2 Status F Date 2017-06-23 Cont ID   Sent By shill Date 2017-06-23 Time 11:41 Rev Time 0.00 Received By shill Date 2017-06-23 Time 11:41 Sent To   Notes 2017-06-23 11:42:23 ENGINEERING APPROVAL REQUIRED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE   ADVISE AS TO STATUS OF ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION   E16120006     Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD Rev No 1 Status F Date 2017-05-11 Cont ID   Sent By shill Date 2017-05-11 Time 08:28 Rev Time 0.00 Received By shill Date 2017-05-11 Time 08:28 Sent To   Notes 2017-05-11 08:28:19 ENGINEERING APPROVAL REQUIRED VIA A SEPARATE   ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL TO THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT         Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT Rev No 4 Status P Date 2017-07-21 Cont ID   Sent By wjolin Date 2017-07-21 Time 13:31 Rev Time 0.00 Received By wjolin Date 2017-07-21 Time 13:31 Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT Rev No 3 Status P Date 2017-07-05 Cont ID   Sent By wjolin Date 2017-07-05 Time 12:48 Rev Time 0.00 Received By wjolin Date 2017-07-05 Time 12:48 Sent To   Notes 2017-07-05 12:48:48 PERMIT #16070916 906 17TH STREET - 68 UNITS (BUILDING   1)   PERMIT #16071059 808 17TH STREET - 45 UNITS (BUILDING   2)   PERMIT #16071058 811 15TH STREET - 6 UNITS (BUILDING 3)   PERMIT #16070880 805 15TH STREET - 6 UNITS (BUILDING 4)       REVIEW COMMENTS - FIRE DEPARTMENT       **VERY IMPORTANT** GENERAL: PER NFPA 241 SECTION   8.7.2.3, WHERE UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS AND HYDRANTS ARE   TO BE PROVIDED, THEY SHALL BE INSTALLED, COMPLETED, AND   IN SERVICE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION WORK.       GENERAL: INDICATE IF ANY TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION   TRAILERS ARE INTEDED TO OCCUPY THE SITE: PER NFPA 241   SECTION 4.2.2: DETACHMENT BETWEEN TEMPORARY STRUCTURES,   ADEQUATE TEMPORARY FIXED FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, AND   PORTABLE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED AS REQUIRED BY THE   AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION.   PER NFPA 241- STANDARD FOR SAFEGUARDING CONSTRUCTION,   ALTERATION, AND DEMOLITION OPERATIONS, SECTION 4.2:   TEMPORARY OFFICES, TRAILERS, AND OTHER FACILITIES OF   COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION OR HOUSING COMBUSTIBLE   CONTENTS SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM ADJACENT BUILDINGS,   TRAILERS OR STRUCTURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH TABLE 4.2.1.   PER TABLE 4.2.1:   1) 20 FEET EXPOSED LENGTH SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM   ADJACENT STRUCTURES BY AT LEAST 30 FEET   2) 30 FEET EXPOSED LENGTH SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM   ADJACENT STRUCTURES BY AT LEAST 35 FEET   3) 40 FEET EXPOSED LENGTH SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM   ADJACENT STRUCTURES BY AT LEAST 40 FEET   4) 50 FEET EXPOSED LENGTH SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM   ADJACENT STRUCTURES BY AT LEAST 45 FEET   5) 60 FEET EXPOSED LENGTH SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM   ADJACENT STRUCTURES BY AT LEAST 50 FEET   6) GREATER THAN 60 FEET EXPOSED LENGTH SHALL BE   SEPARATED FROM ADJACENT STRUCTURES BY AT LEAST 60 FEET   **A 75 PERCENT REDUCTION IN SEPARATION DISTANCES SHALL   BE PERMITTED TO BE APPLIED, PROVIDED AUTOMATIC   SPRINKLER PROTECTION IS USED IN THE EXPOSING STRUCTURE.       REPEAT COMMENT - SHEET WS-2: NO FIRE DEPARTMENT   CONNECTIONS PROVIDED FOR BUILDING #3 OR #4.       REPEAT COMMENT - SHEET FA-1.00A: ALL OF THE CODES AND   STANDARDS REFERENCED IN NOTE #34 ARE OUT OF DATE.       DISCLAIMER: FBC SECTION 105.4.1 PERMIT INTENT: A PERMIT   ISSUED SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO BE A LICENSE TO PROCEED   WITH THE WORK AND NOT AS AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE, CANCEL,   ALTER OR SET ASIDE ANY OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE   TECHNICAL CODES, NOR SHALL ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT PREVENT   THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING A   CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN PLANS, CONSTRUCTION OR   VIOLATIONS OF THIS CODE. REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AHJ   SHALL NOT RELIEVE THE OWNER, CONTRACTOR, ETC. OF THE   RESPONSIBILITY OF COMPLIANCE WITH CODE (NFPA 1, SECTION   1.14.4).       NOTE: SEPARATE PERMITS ISSUED FROM THE BUILDING DEPT.   ARE REQUIRED FOR THE FIRE SPRINKLER, FIRE ALARM, AND   PRIVATE UNDERGROUND FIRE MAINS.       WESLEY JOLIN   ASSISTANT FIRE MARSHAL   WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE   [email protected] Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT Rev No 2 Status P Date 2017-05-31 Cont ID   Sent By wjolin Date 2017-05-31 Time 11:55 Rev Time 0.00 Received By wjolin Date 2017-05-31 Time 11:55 Sent To   Notes 2017-05-31 11:55:40 PERMIT #16070916 906 17TH STREET - 68 UNITS (BUILDING   1)   PERMIT #16071059 808 17TH STREET - 45 UNITS (BUILDING   2)   PERMIT #16071058 811 15TH STREET - 6 UNITS (BUILDING 3)   PERMIT #16070880 805 15TH STREET - 6 UNITS (BUILDING 4)       REVIEW COMMENTS - FIRE DEPARTMENT       **VERY IMPORTANT** GENERAL: PER NFPA 241 SECTION   8.7.2.3, WHERE UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS AND HYDRANTS ARE   TO BE PROVIDED, THEY SHALL BE INSTALLED, COMPLETED, AND   IN SERVICE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION WORK.       GENERAL: INDICATE IF ANY TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION   TRAILERS ARE INTEDED TO OCCUPY THE SITE: PER NFPA 241   SECTION 4.2.2: DETACHMENT BETWEEN TEMPORARY STRUCTURES,   ADEQUATE TEMPORARY FIXED FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, AND   PORTABLE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED AS REQUIRED BY THE   AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION.   PER NFPA 241- STANDARD FOR SAFEGUARDING CONSTRUCTION,   ALTERATION, AND DEMOLITION OPERATIONS, SECTION 4.2:   TEMPORARY OFFICES, TRAILERS, AND OTHER FACILITIES OF   COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION OR HOUSING COMBUSTIBLE   CONTENTS SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM ADJACENT BUILDINGS,   TRAILERS OR STRUCTURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH TABLE 4.2.1.   PER TABLE 4.2.1:   1) 20 FEET EXPOSED LENGTH SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM   ADJACENT STRUCTURES BY AT LEAST 30 FEET   2) 30 FEET EXPOSED LENGTH SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM   ADJACENT STRUCTURES BY AT LEAST 35 FEET   3) 40 FEET EXPOSED LENGTH SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM   ADJACENT STRUCTURES BY AT LEAST 40 FEET   4) 50 FEET EXPOSED LENGTH SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM   ADJACENT STRUCTURES BY AT LEAST 45 FEET   5) 60 FEET EXPOSED LENGTH SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM   ADJACENT STRUCTURES BY AT LEAST 50 FEET   6) GREATER THAN 60 FEET EXPOSED LENGTH SHALL BE   SEPARATED FROM ADJACENT STRUCTURES BY AT LEAST 60 FEET   **A 75 PERCENT REDUCTION IN SEPARATION DISTANCES SHALL   BE PERMITTED TO BE APPLIED, PROVIDED AUTOMATIC   SPRINKLER PROTECTION IS USED IN THE EXPOSING STRUCTURE.       REPEAT COMMENT - SHEET WS-2: NO FIRE DEPARTMENT   CONNECTIONS PROVIDED FOR BUILDING #3 OR #4.       REPEAT COMMENT - SHEET FA-1.00A: ALL OF THE CODES AND   STANDARDS REFERENCED IN NOTE #34 ARE OUT OF DATE.       DISCLAIMER: FBC SECTION 105.4.1 PERMIT INTENT: A PERMIT   ISSUED SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO BE A LICENSE TO PROCEED   WITH THE WORK AND NOT AS AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE, CANCEL,   ALTER OR SET ASIDE ANY OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE   TECHNICAL CODES, NOR SHALL ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT PREVENT   THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING A   CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN PLANS, CONSTRUCTION OR   VIOLATIONS OF THIS CODE. REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AHJ   SHALL NOT RELIEVE THE OWNER, CONTRACTOR, ETC. OF THE   RESPONSIBILITY OF COMPLIANCE WITH CODE (NFPA 1, SECTION   1.14.4).       NOTE: SEPARATE PERMITS ISSUED FROM THE BUILDING DEPT.   ARE REQUIRED FOR THE FIRE SPRINKLER, FIRE ALARM, AND   PRIVATE UNDERGROUND FIRE MAINS.       WESLEY JOLIN   ASSISTANT FIRE MARSHAL   WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE   [email protected] Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT Rev No 1 Status F Date 2016-08-18 Cont ID   Sent By wjolin Date 2016-08-18 Time 15:02 Rev Time 0.00 Received By wjolin Date 2016-08-18 Time 15:02 Sent To   Notes 2016-08-18 15:02:25 PERMIT #16070916 906 17TH STREET - 68 UNITS (BUILDING   1)   PERMIT #16071059 808 17TH STREET - 45 UNITS (BUILDING   2)   PERMIT #16071058 811 15TH STREET - 6 UNITS (BUILDING 3)   PERMIT #16070880 805 15TH STREET - 6 UNITS (BUILDING 4)       REVIEW COMMENTS - FIRE DEPARTMENT       **VERY IMPORTANT** GENERAL: PER NFPA 241 SECTION   8.7.2.3, WHERE UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS AND HYDRANTS ARE   TO BE PROVIDED, THEY SHALL BE INSTALLED, COMPLETED, AND   IN SERVICE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION WORK.       GENERAL: INDICATE IF ANY TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION   TRAILERS ARE INTEDED TO OCCUPY THE SITE: PER NFPA 241   SECTION 4.2.2: DETACHMENT BETWEEN TEMPORARY STRUCTURES,   ADEQUATE TEMPORARY FIXED FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, AND   PORTABLE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED AS REQUIRED BY THE   AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION.   PER NFPA 241- STANDARD FOR SAFEGUARDING CONSTRUCTION,   ALTERATION, AND DEMOLITION OPERATIONS, SECTION 4.2:   TEMPORARY OFFICES, TRAILERS, AND OTHER FACILITIES OF   COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION OR HOUSING COMBUSTIBLE   CONTENTS SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM ADJACENT BUILDINGS,   TRAILERS OR STRUCTURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH TABLE 4.2.1.   PER TABLE 4.2.1:   1) 20 FEET EXPOSED LENGTH SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM   ADJACENT STRUCTURES BY AT LEAST 30 FEET   2) 30 FEET EXPOSED LENGTH SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM   ADJACENT STRUCTURES BY AT LEAST 35 FEET   3) 40 FEET EXPOSED LENGTH SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM   ADJACENT STRUCTURES BY AT LEAST 40 FEET   4) 50 FEET EXPOSED LENGTH SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM   ADJACENT STRUCTURES BY AT LEAST 45 FEET   5) 60 FEET EXPOSED LENGTH SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM   ADJACENT STRUCTURES BY AT LEAST 50 FEET   6) GREATER THAN 60 FEET EXPOSED LENGTH SHALL BE   SEPARATED FROM ADJACENT STRUCTURES BY AT LEAST 60 FEET   **A 75 PERCENT REDUCTION IN SEPARATION DISTANCES SHALL   BE PERMITTED TO BE APPLIED, PROVIDED AUTOMATIC   SPRINKLER PROTECTION IS USED IN THE EXPOSING STRUCTURE.       SHEET WS-1 & WS-2: PROVIDE CHAIN WITH LOCK AND TAMPER   SWITCHES FOR SUPERVISING THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER IN THE   OPEN POSITION. PROVIDE LOCKING KNOX CAPS ON FIRE   DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS.       SHEET WS-2: NO FIRE MAINS OR FIRE DEPARTMENT   CONNECTIONS PROVIDED FOR BUILDING #3 OR #4.       SHEET PD-2: THE SOUTH ENTRANCE OFF 15TH STREET IS ONLY   12 FEET WIDE. PER SECTION 18.2.3.4.1.1 (NFPA 1), FIRE   DEPARTMENT ACCESS ROADS SHALL HAVE A SURFACE DESIGNED   TO ACCOMMODATE FIRE APPARATUS WEIGHING AT LEAST 36   TONS. ACCESS ROADS SHALL HAVE AN UNOBSTRUCTED WIDTH OF   NOT LESS THAN 20 FEET AND AN UNOBSTRUCTED VERTICAL   CLEARANCE OF NOT LESS THAN 13 FEET 6 INCHES.       SHEET LS1.05: THE CLUB ROOM IS AN ASSEMBLY ROOM WITH A   POSSIBLE OCCUPANT LOAD OF 60 TO140 PERSONS DEPENDING   UPON THE OCCUPANT LOAD FACTOR USED. DOOR C WILL NEED TO   HAVE THE SWING REVERSED TO SWING WITH EGRESS. DOORS C   AND D WILL NEED PANIC HARDWARE IF NOT ALREADY EQUIPPED.       SHEET LS1.05: WHEN OCCUPANTS LEAVE THE EXERCISE ROOM,   WHAT ROUTE IS BEING UTILIZED FOR THE SECONDARY MEANS OF   EGRESS? THE PRIMARY MEANS OF EGRESS IS TO THE EAST.       EXIT SIGNAGE: SOME OF THE CORRIDORS HAVE AN   INSUFFICIENT AMOUNT OF EXIT SIGNS. PER NFPA 101 SECTION   7.10.1.5.2 NEW SIGN PLACEMENT SHALL BE SUCH THAT NO   POINT IN AN EXIT ACCESS CORRIDOR IS IN EXCESS OF THE   RATED VIEWING DISTANCE OR 100 FEET, WHICHEVER IS LESS,   FROM THE NEAREST SIGN.       EMERGENCY LIGHTING: BUILDING 1 APPEARS TO ONLY HAVE   EMERGENCY LIGHTING IN THE STAIRS AND ELEVATOR LOBBY   AREAS. PER NFPA 101 SECTION 30.2.9 EMERGENCY LIGHTING   SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ALL BUILDINGS FOUR OR MORE STORIES   IN HEIGHT, OR WITH MORE THAN 12 DWELLING UNITS, UNLESS   EVERY DWELLING UNIT HAS A DIRECT EXIT TO THE OUTSIDE OF   THE BUILDING AT THE FINISHED GROUND LEVEL.       SHEET FA-1.00A: ALL OF THE CODES AND STANDARDS   REFERENCED IN NOTE #34 ARE OUT OF DATE.       FIRE ALARM ADA: NO VISUAL DEVICES PROVIDED IN THE ADA   UNITS.       FIRE SPRINKLERS: BUILDINGS 3 AND 4 ARE NOT PROTECTED BY   AN AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM. PER NFPA 101   SECTION 30.3.5.1 ALL NEW APARTMENT BUILDINGS SHALL BE   PROTECTED THROUGHOUT BY AN APPROVED, SUPERVISED   AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM.       DISCLAIMER: FBC SECTION 105.4.1 PERMIT INTENT: A PERMIT   ISSUED SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO BE A LICENSE TO PROCEED   WITH THE WORK AND NOT AS AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE, CANCEL,   ALTER OR SET ASIDE ANY OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE   TECHNICAL CODES, NOR SHALL ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT PREVENT   THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING A   CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN PLANS, CONSTRUCTION OR   VIOLATIONS OF THIS CODE. REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AHJ   SHALL NOT RELIEVE THE OWNER, CONTRACTOR, ETC. OF THE   RESPONSIBILITY OF COMPLIANCE WITH CODE (NFPA 1, SECTION   1.14.4).       NOTE: SEPARATE PERMITS ISSUED FROM THE BUILDING DEPT.   ARE REQUIRED FOR THE FIRE SPRINKLER, FIRE ALARM, AND   PRIVATE UNDERGROUND FIRE MAINS.       WESLEY JOLIN   ASSISTANT FIRE MARSHAL   WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE   [email protected] Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING Rev No 7 Status N Date 2017-08-10 Cont ID   Sent By shill Date 2017-08-10 Time 15:38 Rev Time 0.00 Received By shill Date 2017-08-10 Time 12:55 Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING Rev No 6 Status N Date 2017-08-09 Cont ID   Sent By shill Date 2017-08-09 Time 09:27 Rev Time 0.00 Received By shill Date 2017-08-04 Time 09:02 Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING Rev No 5 Status N Date 2017-08-04 Cont ID   Sent By lmarchan Date 2017-08-04 Time 15:20 Rev Time 0.00 Received By lmarchan Date 2017-08-04 Time 13:39 Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING Rev No 4 Status N Date 2017-07-31 Cont ID   Sent By cpuell Date 2017-07-31 Time 11:42 Rev Time 0.00 Received By cpuell Date 2017-07-19 Time 16:04 Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING Rev No 3 Status N Date 2017-07-17 Cont ID   Sent By cpuell Date 2017-07-17 Time 13:44 Rev Time 0.00 Received By cpuell Date 2017-07-03 Time 08:55 Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING Rev No 2 Status N Date 2017-06-24 Cont ID   Sent By shill Date 2017-06-24 Time 10:58 Rev Time 0.00 Received By shill Date 2017-05-18 Time 11:26 Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING Rev No 1 Status N Date 2016-10-20 Cont ID   Sent By cpuell Date 2016-10-20 Time 15:53 Rev Time 0.00 Received By cpuell Date 2016-08-15 Time 10:05 Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop IMPACT COUNTY IMPACT FEES Rev No 2 Status P Date 2017-08-07 Cont ID   Sent By shill Date 2017-08-07 Time 16:51 Rev Time 0.00 Received By shill Date 2017-08-07 Time 16:51 Sent To   Notes 2017-08-07 16:51:12 MU-2017-021132   125 UNITS     Review Stop IMPACT COUNTY IMPACT FEES Rev No 1 Status F Date 2016-09-17 Cont ID   Sent By shill Date 2016-09-17 Time 12:58 Rev Time 0.00 Received By shill Date 2016-09-17 Time 12:58 Sent To   Notes 2016-09-17 13:05:07 ****CORRECTIONS****       SAMANTHA HILL   BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER   [email protected]   561-805-6724       IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT BY PALM BEACH COUNTY IS REQUIRED   PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE. THE PLANS ARE TO BE STAMPED   AND THE RECEIPT SHOWING THAT THE FEES HAVE BEEN PAID IS   TO BE PROVIDED.       THIS MAY BE DONE AT ANY TIME DURING THE PLAN REVIEW   PROCESS, AND MAY BE DONE AFTER ALL OTHER PLAN REVIEWS   HAVE PASSED.       CONTACT 561-233-5025 FOR MORE INFORMATION.         Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C) Rev No 4 Status P Date 2017-07-20 Cont ID   Sent By ccole Date 2017-07-20 Time 12:49 Rev Time 0.00 Received By ccole Date 2017-07-20 Time 12:49 Sent To   Notes 2017-07-20 12:54:17 MECHANICAL PROVISOS   PERMIT #16071058   BUILDING #3   7/20/2017       1) PROVIDE A ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED AND SEALED COVER   SHEET AND INDEX FOR ALL THE OF AC SYSTEM SIZING   CALCULATIONS.       CHRISTOPHER L. COLE   MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER   401 CLEMATIS STREET   WEST PALM BEACH FL 33401   561-805-6719   [email protected]     Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C) Rev No 3 Status F Date 2017-07-14 Cont ID   Sent By ccole Date 2017-07-14 Time 15:39 Rev Time 0.00 Received By ccole Date 2017-07-14 Time 15:08 Sent To   Notes 2017-07-14 15:45:03 3RD REVIEW FBC-2014 MECHANICAL   PERMIT #16071058   BUILDING #3   7/14/17       PLAN REVIEW RESULTS: DENIED.       1) THE ENGINEER'S NARRATIVE AND THE CORRECTED PLANS   HAVE ONLY ADDRESSED COMMENT #3 FROM THE 2ND REVIEW. I   AM REPRINTING THE COMMENTS BELOW WITH COMMENT #3   REMOVED- PLEASE COMPLY.       2ND REVIEW FBC-2014 MECHANICAL   PERMIT #16071058   6/8/17       1) COMMENT #1 FROM THE 1ST REVIEW STILL EXISTS- MISSING   DOCUMENTS: THE SUBMITTED AC CALCULATION PACKET DOES NOT   INCLUDE THE AHU-A2/CU-2, AHU-A3/CU-3, & AHU-B2/CU-2,   SYSTEMS, AND ARE LISTING MIAMI AS THE LOCATION. A)   REVIEW THE AC SCHEDULE ON M-4.00 AS THE 4-TON SYSTEM   AHU-1 SYSTEM DOES NOT MATCH THE AHU-1 SYSTEM SHOWN ON   SHEET M-2.00 IN TERMS OF CAPACITY. B)       REFER TO SECTION C403.2.1 FBC-14 ENERGY CONSERVATION. A   COOLING AND HEATING CALCULATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR   EACH SYSTEM SHOWN ON THE PLAN, AND ALL SUMMARY   CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED BY A REGISTERED ENGINEER SHALL   BEAR THE SIGNATURE AND SEAL OF THE ENGINEER.       2) SHEET M-2.00: THE DRYER EXHAUST DUCTS IN UNITS A1,   A1 ACCESSIBLE, AND A3 ARE NOT PERMITTED TO RUN THROUGH   THE MECHANICAL CLOSETS PER SECTION 504.4.       4) MISSING DOCUMENTS: PROVIDE ENERGY COMPLIANCE FORM   R405-2014 FOR UNIT A1, AND FOR ENTIRE BUILDING #3.       CHRISTOPHER L. COLE   MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER   401 CLEMATIS STREET   WEST PALM BEACH FL 33401   561-805-6719   [email protected]             Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C) Rev No 2 Status F Date 2017-06-08 Cont ID   Sent By ccole Date 2017-06-08 Time 07:26 Rev Time 0.00 Received By ccole Date 2017-06-08 Time 07:01 Sent To   Notes 2017-06-08 07:27:27 2ND REVIEW FBC-2014 MECHANICAL   PERMIT #16071058   6/8/17       RESULTS: DENIED.       1) COMMENT #1 FROM THE 1ST REVIEW STILL EXISTS- THE   SUBMITTED AC CALCULATION PACKET DOES NOT INCLUDE THE   AHU-A2/CU-2, AHU-A3/CU-3, & AHU-B2/CU-2, SYSTEMS, AND   ARE LISTING MIAMI AS THE LOCATION. A) REVIEW THE AC   SCHEDULE ON M-4.00 AS THE 4-TON SYSTEM AHU-1 SYSTEM   DOES NOT MATCH THE AHU-1 SYSTEM SHOWN ON SHEET M-2.00   IN TERMS OF CAPACITY. B)       REFER TO SECTION C403.2.1 FBC-14 ENERGY CONSERVATION. A   COOLING AND HEATING CALCULATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR   EACH SYSTEM SHOWN ON THE PLAN, AND ALL SUMMARY   CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED BY A REGISTERED ENGINEER SHALL   BEAR THE SIGNATURE AND SEAL OF THE ENGINEER.       2) SHEET M-2.00: THE DRYER EXHAUST DUCTS IN UNITS A1,   A1 ACCESSIBLE, AND A3 ARE NOT PERMITTED TO RUN THROUGH   THE MECHANICAL CLOSETS PER SECTION 504.4.       3) M-2.01, UNIT B-1: AS PREVIOUSLY NOTED IN THE 1ST   REVIEW DRYER BOOSTER FANS ARE NO LONGER PERMITTED BY   CODE.       4) PROVIDE ENERGY COMPLIANCE FORM R405-2014 FOR UNIT   A1.       CHRISTOPHER L. COLE   MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER   401 CLEMATIS STREET   WEST PALM BEACH FL 33401   561-805-6719   [email protected]     Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C) Rev No 1 Status F Date 2016-08-29 Cont ID   Sent By ccole Date 2016-08-29 Time 12:04 Rev Time 0.00 Received By ccole Date 2016-08-29 Time 11:22 Sent To   Notes 2016-08-29 12:05:55 1ST REVIEW FBC-2014 MECHANICAL   PERMIT #16071058   ROYAL PALM PLACE, BUILDING-3.       1) THE SUBMITTED AC CALCULATION PACKET DOES NOT INCLUDE   THE AHU-A2/CU-2, AHU-A3/CU-3, & AHU-B2/CU-2, SYSTEMS,   AND ARE LISTING MIAMI AS THE LOCATION. A) REVIEW THE AC   SCHEDULE ON M-4.00 AS THE 4-TON SYSTEM AHU-1 SYSTEM   DOES NOT MATCH THE AHU-1 SYSTEM SHOWN ON SHEET M-2.00   IN TERMS OF CAPACITY. B) REFER TO SECTION C403.2.1   FBC-14 ENERGY       CONSERVATION: A COOLING AND HEATING CALCULATION SHALL   BE SUBMITTED FOR EACH SYSTEM SHOWN ON THE PLAN, AND ALL   SUMMARY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED BY A REGISTERED ENGINEER   SHALL BEAR THE SIGNATURE AND SEAL OF THE ENGINEER. SEE   ALSO SECTION C407.5.2.3 IF SUBMITTING A TOTAL BUILDING   PERFORMANCE ENERGY COMPLIANCE METHOD.       2) SHEETS M-1.09, M-2.00, & M-400: THE SPLIT AC   SCHEDULE DOES NOT INCLUDE THE AHU-2, AHU-3, AHU-B2, &   AHU-B3 SYSTEMS.       3) SHEETS M2.00 & M-2.01: THE EXCEPTION UNDER SECTION   504.6.1 THAT ALLOWED THE USE OF DRYER BOOSTER FANS HAS   BEEN REMOVED FROM THE FBC-14 MECHANICAL CODE. PLEASE   SUBMIT MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS AND EXHAUST VENT   INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.       4) THE PROPOSED BUILDING SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH   THE FBC-14 ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE. REFER TO SECTIONS   C101.2, C101.5, AND C401.2 AND SUBMIT COMPLIANCE   MATERIALS AND FORMS.       5) PROVIDE EQUIPMENT SCHEDULES FOR THE APARTMENT   OUTSIDE AIR FANS AND MOTORIZED DAMPERS, AND PROVIDE   CLEARANCE DISTANCE MEASUREMENTS FOR ALL AIR INTAKES-   SECTION 401.4       CHRISTOPHER L. COLE   MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER   561-805-6719   [email protected]             Review Stop P PLUMBING Rev No 4 Status N Date 2017-07-20 Cont ID   Sent By tklarge Date 2017-07-20 Time 09:39 Rev Time 0.00 Received By tklarge Date 2017-07-20 Time 09:39 Sent To   Notes 2017-07-20 09:40:23 APPROVED UNDER 3RD REVIEW WITH PROVISOS. Review Stop P PLUMBING Rev No 3 Status P Date 2017-07-14 Cont ID   Sent By tklarge Date 2017-07-14 Time 14:58 Rev Time 0.00 Received By tklarge Date 2017-07-14 Time 14:58 Sent To   Notes 2017-07-14 14:58:54 1) SHT. A6.08 - THE CLEAR FLOOR SPACE FOR THE LAVATORY   SHALL BE CENTERED ON THE FIXTURE PER THE FAIR HOUSING   ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES.IN ADDITION, PROVIDE THE CLEAR   LENGTH X WIDTH DIMENSIONS OF ALL REQUIRED CLEAR FLOOR   SPACE DIMENSIONS FOR THE FIXTURES PER THE FHAG.   2) SHT. A6.10 - SHOW THE DIMENSIONS OF THE CLEAR FLOOR   SPACE FOR THE WATER CLOSET IN THE A1 UNIT MODEL. COMPLY   WITH FHAG.   3) SHT. A 6.10 - UNITS A1 & B1 ARE SHOWN AS A TYPE "A"   & "B" DESIGN SPECIFICATION BATHROOM PER THE FHAG. IF   THESE ARE "UFAS" UNITS, IDENTIFY THEM AS SUCH. WPB   AMEND. TO FBC SEC. 107.2.1.   4) THE LETTTER FROM THE ARCHITECT REGARDING THE TOILET   FACILITIES FOR WORKERS IS VAGUE AND IS UNACCEPTABLE.   REFERENCE IS MADE TO A MAINTENANCE RESTROOM BUT THERE   IS NO MAINTENANCE RESTROOM IN BUILDING #1.SANITARY   FACILITIES FOR WORKERS IN THE MAINTENANCE AND TRASH   AREAS OF BUILDING #1 SHALL BE PROVIDED WITHIN 500 FEET   OF THESE AREAS. 2014 FBC SEC. 403.3.3   5) SHT. P4.05 - A URINAL IS NOT PERMITTED ON A WET VENT   THE RISER SHOWS THE URINAL IN THE MEN'S RESTROOM ACROSS   FROM THE EXERCISE ROOM DISCHARGING INTO A VERTICAL WET   VENT ABOVE THE LAVATORY. THE URINAL IS TO BE INSTALLED   ON IT'S OWN STACK & VENTED. 2014 FBC SECS.912.1,   912.1.1. 3RD REQUEST.   6) SHT. P2.05B - THE MEN'S AND WOMEN'S RESTROOMS ACROSS   FROM THE EXERCISE ROOM ARE STILL MISLABELED.PLEASE   REVISE.   7) THE LOCATION OF SANITARY RISERS S/24 & S/25 LOCATED   ACROSS FROM THE LAUNDRY ROOM ON SHT. P2.05B ARE   REVERSED AS TO THE LAYOUT ON SHT. P4.05, REFER TO   BUILDING # II, UNIT B1.2ND REQUEST.   8) THE DETAIL FOR THE "PLENUM RATED" WATER METERS ON   SHEET P5.00 WILL REQUIRE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION FROM   THE MANUFACTURER CWE. INFORMATION ON THEIR WEBSITE   INDICATES THEY DO NOT MANUFACTURE "PLENUM RATED WATER   METERS". THE MATERIAL COMPOSITION OF THE WATER METERS   SHALL MEET THE SMOKE- DEVELOPED INDEX AND FLAME SPREAD   RATING REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM E84 OR UL 723. THE FLAME   SPREAD INDEX SHALL BE NOT MORE THAN 25 AND THE   SMOKE-DEVELOPED INDEX SHALL NOT BE MORE THAN 50. 2014   FBC - MECHANICAL SEC. 602.2.1.2ND REQUEST.   9) SHT. P1.00 - THE ORIENTATION OF BUILDING # II IN   RELATION TO THE POINT OF COMPASS ON THE PLAN DOES NOT   CORRELATE WITH THE ORIENTATION OF BULDING II ON SHT.   P2.05. CLARIFY. 2ND REQUEST.       NOTE: THE ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE PROVISOS FOR APPROVAL OF   THESE PLANS FOR PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW. REVISED PLANS   SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE   ISSUANCE OF THE PLUMBING PERMIT.   T.LARGE, CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR   JULY 14TH, 2017.           TIM LARGE   CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR   PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW   561-805-6692   [email protected]         Review Stop P PLUMBING Rev No 2 Status F Date 2017-06-20 Cont ID   Sent By tklarge Date 2017-06-20 Time 6:15 Rev Time 0.00 Received By tklarge Date 2017-06-20 Time 05:44 Sent To   Notes 2017-06-19 14:26:19 1) SHT. A5.08 - ACCESSIBLE RESTROOM FIXTURE LEGEND -   THE TOILET PAPER DISPENSER SHALL BE LOCATED 7-9 INCHES   FROM THE FRONT OF THE WATER CLOSET TO THE CENTERLINE OF   THE FIRST TOILET PAPER DISPENSER, NOT TO THE CENTERLINE   OF THE UNIT AS SHOWN. 2014 FBC-ACCESS. SEC.604.7.   2) SHT.A6.15 - USABLE BATHROOM FIGURES - IDENTIFY ON   THE PLANS WHICH BATHROOMS ARE DESIGN SPECIFICATION "A"   OR "B" OF THE FHA. THIS SHEET HAS NOT BEEN REVISED AS   NOTED IN THE RESPONSE NARRATIVE. 2ND REQUEST.   3) SUBMIT A SEPARATE LETTER FROM THE DESIGN   PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD STATING THAT SANITARY FACILITIES   FOR THE MAINTENANCE WORKERS ARE LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET   OF THE TRASH ROOMS, MAINTENANCE ROOMS, ETC., PER 2014   FBC-PLUMBING SEC.403.3.3.   4) SUBMIT MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS/INSTALLATION   MANUAL FOR THE OIL SMART PUMP SYSTEM IN THE ELEVATOR   SHAFT.WPB AMEND. TO FBC SEC. 107.2.1.2ND REQUEST.   5) SUBMIT CALCULATIONS AS TO HOW YOU ARRIVED AT THE   SIZE OF THE SCHIER LAUNDRY INTERCEPTOR.2014   FBC-PLUMBING.2ND REQUEST.   6) ACCESS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE WATER SUPPLY VALVES   FOR THE STACKED WASHERS/DRYERS. I COULD NOT FIND THE   REVISED NOTE ON THE PLANS. CLARIFY. 2014 FPC   SEC.606.3.2ND REQUEST   7) SHT. P4.05 - A URINAL IS NOT PERMITTED ON A WET   VENT. 2014 FBC-PLUMBING SEC.912.1, 912.1.1. THE ADDED   STACK APPEARS TO HAVE A CLEANOUT ON IT BUT NO URINAL.   CLARIFY.   8) SHT.P2.05 - THE MEN'S AND WOMENS RESTROOMS ACROSS   FROM THE EXERCISE ROOM ARE STILL MISLABELED.THE SAME   ISSUE OCCURS ON SHT. P2.05B AND ON THE ENLARGED PLAN ON   P2.05B AND ALSO THERE ARE NO PLUMBING FIXTURES SHOWN IN   THE MEN'S RESTROOM ON SHT. P2.05B.   9) THE LOCATION OF THE SANITARY RISERS S/24 & S/25 ON   SHT. P2.05 B ARE REVERSED AS TO THE LAYOUT ON   SHT.P4.05. BUILDING # II, SEE UNIT B1.   10) THE LOCATION OF SANITARY RISERS S/24 & S/25 ON   SHT.SHT. P2.05 A DOES NOT CORRELATE WITH THE LOCATION   SHOWN ON SHT. P4.05.THE RISERS ARE REVERSED.   11) SUBMIT A DETAIL FOR THE SUB-WATER METERS IF THEY   ARE BEING INSTALLED IN THESE BUILDINGS. SHOW THE   LOCATION OF THE SUB-METERS IF APPLICABLE. MATERIALS   PLACED WITHIN RETURN AIR PLENUMS SHALL BE   NONCOMBUSTIBLE OR SHALL BE LISTED AND LABELED AS HAVING   A FLAME SPREAD INDEX OF NOT MORE THAN 25 AND A   SMOKE-DEVELOPED INDEX OF NOT MORE THAN 50 WHEN TESTED   IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E84 OR UL 723.2014   FBC-MECHANICAL SEC. 602.2.1.   12) SHT. P4.06 - A SHUTOFF VALVE IS REQUIRED ON THE 2   INCH WATER MAIN SUPPLY TO THE AMENITIES/LEASING AREA   PER 2014 FBC-PLUMBING SEC.606.2.   13) SHT.P1.00 - THE ORIENTATION OF BUILDING II IN   RELATION TO THE POINT OF COMPASS ON THE PLAN DOES NOT   CORRELATE WITH THE ORIENTATION OF BUILDING II ON SHT.   P2.05. CLARIFY.           TIM LARGE   CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR   PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW   561-805-6692   [email protected]                 Review Stop P PLUMBING Rev No 1 Status F Date 2016-09-26 Cont ID   Sent By tklarge Date 2016-09-26 Time 08:31 Rev Time 0.00 Received By tklarge Date 2016-09-24 Time 04:32 Sent To   Notes 2016-09-24 09:18:23 1) SHT.A-0.01 - PROJECT DATA - THE PLAN REFERS TO THE   2010 FBC. THE CODE IN EFFECT IS THE 5TH EDITION (2014)   VERSION OF THE FBC. REVISE THE NOTE.   2) SHT. A0.01 - PROJECT DATA - COMPLIANCE NOTE -   FLORIDA DOES NOT ENFORCE THE ADA. FLORIDA HAS IT'S OWN   ACCESSIBILITY CODE UNDER THE 2014 FLORIDA BUILDING   CODE. REVISE THE NOTE TO READ 2014 FBC-ACCESSIBILITY   VOLUME.   3) INDICATION THE DESIGN OPTION OF THE FAIR HOUSING ACT   (SPECIFICATION "A" OR SPECIFICATION "B" ) FOR THE   DWELLING UNITS. IF THERE IS A MIX OF SPECIFICATION A OR   B, INDICATE WHICH SPECIFICATION APPLIES TO WHICH UNITS.   WPB AMENDMENTS TO FBC SEC. 107.2.1.   4) THE W/S DRAWINGS HAVE NOT BEEN DIGITALLY SIGNED AND   SEALED AS REQUIRED BY FL. ADDMIN. CODE 61G15-23.001.   5) SHT. A1.01 - DETAIL #1 SHOWS A DRAIN IN THE DUMPSTER   AREA. PROVIDE DETAILS AS TO THE TERMINATION POINT OF   THIS DRAIN. I DID NOT SEE ANY THING ON THE SITE   PLAN/CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR THIS DRAIN.   6) SHT. A9.0 - DETAIL #1 - THE SIZING OF GUTTERS SHALL   COMPLY WITH 2014 FPC TABLE 1106.6. INDICATE THE SLOPE   OF THE GUTTERS AND THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE ROOF   DRAINING INTO THE GUTTERS.   7) SHT. A5.08 - ACCESSIBLE RESTROOM FIXTURE LEGEND -   THE TOILET PAPER DISPENSER SHALL BE LOCATED 7-9 INCHES   FROM THE FRONT OF THE WATER CLOSET TO THE CENTERLINE OF   THE DISPENSER. FAC SEC. 604.7.   8) SHT. A5.08 - SHOW THE DIMENSIONS (LXW) OF THE   REQUIRED CLEAR FLOOR SPACES FOR THE ACCESSIBLE   FIXTURES. COMPLY WITH FAC SECS. 305, 602, 604.3, 606.2,   9) THE MAXIMUM DEPTH OF LAVATORY VANITIES IN THE   DWELLING UNITS SHALL BE 24 INCHES IN ACCORDANCE WITH   THE FHA GUIDELINES REQ. #7. SEE SHT. A6.14.   10) SHT. A6.11 - DETAIL A & B - SHOW THE REQUIRED   CLEARANCE BETWEEN OPPOSING BASE CABINETS, COUNTERTOPS,   AND APPLIANCES PER REQUIREMENT #7 OF THE FHA   GUIDELINES.   11) SHT. A6.15 - USABLE BATHROOM FIGURES - IDENTIFY   WHICH BATHROOMS ARE DESIGN SPECIFICATION A AND B.   12) THE BUILDINGS HAVE TRASH ROOMS, MAINTENANCE ROOMS,   ETC. SANITARY FACILITIES FOR THE MAINTENANCE WORKERS   SHALL BE PROVIDED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THESE SPACES OF   THE BUILDINGS. 2014 FL. PLBG. CODE SEC.403.3.3.   13) SHT. P1.00 SHOWS A 4 INCH DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE   LINE TO NOWHERE IN THE NE CORNER OF THE SHEET (BLDG.   #2) ? CLARIFY.   14) THE PLUMBING SHEETS REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR THE   CONTINUATION OF PLUMBING LINES. INDICATE THE SPECIFIC   CIVIL SHEET WHERE THE LINE CAN BE LOCATED. WPB AMEND.   TO FBC SEC. 107.2.1.   15) THE PLUMBING PLANS REFER TO "SHEET DRAWINGS" FOR   THE CATCH BASINS. CLARIFY.   16) THE POINT OF COMPASS ON THE PLUMBING DRAWINGS DOES   NOT INDICATE "NORTH", OR IT IS SO LIGHT ON THE PLANS   THAT A DETERMINATION CANNOT BE MADE. CLEARLY SHOW   "NORTH" ON THE PLANS.WPB AMEND, TO FBC SEC. 107.2.1.   17) SHT. P-1.00 - IF POSSIBLE, IDENTIFY THE BUILDINGS   ON THE PLAN. WPB AMEND. TO FBC SEC. 107.2.1.   18) SHT. P-2.00 - PROVIDE A REFERENCE NOTE LEGEND FOR   THIS PAGE AND ANY OTHER PAGES WHERE IT IS MISSING. WPB   AMEND. TO FBC SEC. 107.2.1.   19) SHT.P-2.00 - THERE ARE STORM DRAIN LINES, RAIN   WATER LEADER LINES, SANITARY LINES AND DOMESTIC WATER   LINES EXITING THE BUILDINGS WITH NO CONTINUATION POINT   SHOWN OR REFERENCED, PLEASE REFERENCE THE DRAWING   /SHEET NUMBER FOR CONTINUATION AND AVOID GENERAL NOTES   SUCH AS "SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR CONTINUATION".WPB   AMEND. TO FBC SEC. 107.2.1.   20) SUBMIT MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS/INSTALLATION   MANUAL FOR THE OIL SMART PUMP SYSTEM IN THE ELEVATOR   SHAFT.WPB AMEND. TO FBC SEC. 107.2.1.   21) THE HUB DRAINS FOR THE ELEVATOR SUMP DRAIN SHALL BE   EQUIPPED WITH TRAP PRIMERS PER THE 2014 FPC SEC.1002.4.   22) SUBMIT CALCULATIONS AS TO HOW YOU ARRIVED AT THE   SIZE OF THE SCHIER LAUNDRY INTERCEPTOR.FPC SEC. 1003.2.   23) SHT. P-2.05 REFERS TO AN ENLARGED FLOOR PLAN OF THE   LAUNDRY, RESTROOMS ETC. ON THE SAME SHEET. THERE IS NO   SUCH PLAN ON THE SHEET. REFER TO SHEET P-2.05 B. REVISE   NOTE TO REFER TO CORRECT SHEET.   24) THE PLUMBING DRAWINGS SHOW STACKS IN THE WALLS WITH   IDENTIFICATION TAGS FOR THE RISERS BUT AN ARROW IS   INDICATING A DIFFERENT RISER THAN WHAT IS IDENTIFIED.   CLARIFY.   25) SUBMIT A DETAIL OF THE DRYWELL.WPB AMEND. TO FBC   SEC. 107.2.1   26) ACCESS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO WATER SUPPLY VALVES FOR   THE STACKED WASHERS/DRYERS. 2014 FPC SEC.606.3.   27) SHT. P-2.00 SHOWS RISER S/16 IN UNIT B1 ( #115 )   BUT THIS RISER IS NOT ON THE COOLECTION SYSTEM ON   SHT.P-4.01 - CLARIFY.   28) SHT. P-4.01 - RISER S/8 - UNIT A1 - (# 114 ) -   THERE ARE TWO RISERS WITH THE IDENTIFICATION TAG S/8 ON   THE COLLECTION ISOMETRIC BUT ONLY ONE S/8 RISER ON THE   PLAN VIEW ON SHT. P-2.00. CLARIFY.   29) SHT. P-4.01 - THE ELEVATOR SUMP DRAINS ARE NOT   SHOWN ON THE COLLECTION ISOMETRIC. CLARIFY.   30) SHT. P-4.03 - INDICATE THE RAINFALL RATE USED IN   SIZING THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM.THE RAINFALL RATE USED   FOR THE SIZING OF THE SYSTEM SHALL BE 5 INCHES PERR   HOUR. 2014 FPC SEC.1106.1.   31) INDICATE ON THE PLANS THE SLOPE OF THE PIPE FOR THE   STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM. COMPLY WITH 2014 FPC SEC. 1106.2   & 1106.3.   32) SHT. P-4.05 - A URINAL IS NOT PERNITTED ON A WET   VENT PER FPC SEC. 912.1, 912.1.1. ONLY THE FIXTURES IN   THE BATHROOM GROUP ARE PERMITTED TO DISCHARGE INTO THE   WET VENT. REFER TO THE DEFINITION OF "BATHROOM GROUP"   IN THE DEFINITIONS (SEC. 202) OF THE 2014 FPC.   33) SHT. P-2.05 B - THE MEN'S AND WOMEN'S RESTROOMS ARE   MISLABELED.   34) THE LOCATION OF RISERS S/24 AND RISER S/25 ON SHT.   P2.05 B ARE REVERSED AS TO THE LAYOUT ON SHT. P-4.05.   SEE BUILDING #2 - UNIT B1 ( UNIT #115 ).   35) SHT. P-4.05 - THE WASHING MACHINE STACKS SHALL BE A   MINIMUM OF 3 INCHES PER THE 2014 FPC SEC.406.2.   36) SHT. P-4.05 - THE DRAINS FOR THE ELEVATOR SUMP ARE   NOT SHOWN ON THE RISER DIAGRAM. SHOW ALL PIPING ON THE   SANITARY RISER. WPB AMEND. TO FBC SEC. 107.3.5.1.3.   37) THE LOCATION OF SANITARY RISERS S/24 AND S/25 ON   SHT.P-2.05 A DOES NOT CORRELATE WITH THE LOCATION OF   THE RISERS ON SHT. P-4.05. THE RISERS ARE REVERSED. THE   LOCATION OF RISER S/32 ON THE PLAN VIEW ON SHT.P-2.05 (   A) DOES NOT CORRELATE WITH THE LOCATION ON THE SANITARY   COLLECTION ISOMETRIC ON SHT. P-4.05.   38) SHT. P-4.05 - THERE ARE TWO SANITARY RISERS LABELED   S/23 AND ONLY ONE ON THE PLAN VIEW ON SHT,P-2.05 (A).   SEE UNIT B1 (#100).   39) SHT. P-2.05 A - RISER S/22 IS SHOWN ON THE PLAN   VIEW BUT NOT ON THE SANITARY COLLECTION ISOMETRIC ON   SHT.P-4.05. REFER TO WALL BETWEEN UNIT B1 ( UNIT #100 )   AND UNIT A1 ( UNIT # 101 ). THIS IS NOT MISLABELED AS   THERE IS A RISER S/23 FURTHER UPSTREAM.   40) SHT. P- 5.00 - WASHING MACHINE BOX DETAIL - ACCESS   IS REQD. FOR THE UNION & REMOVEABLE TRAP SHOWN ON THE   DETAIL PER THE 2014 FPC SEC.405.8.   41) SHT. P-5.00 - CHUTE DETAIL - A WATER HAMMER   ARRESTOR IS REQUIRED ON THIS WATER LINE FOR THE WASH   DOWN AS IT HAS A SOLENOID VALVE AND IS CCONSIDERED A   QUICK CLOSING VALVE. 2014 FPC SEC. 604.9.       TIM LARGE   CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR   PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW   561-805-6692   [email protected]                                                 Review Stop R ROOF PLAN REVIEW Rev No 1 Status N Date 2016-10-05 Cont ID   Sent By shill Date 2016-10-05 Time 06:52 Rev Time 0.00 Received By shill Date 2016-10-05 Time 06:52 Sent To   Notes 2016-10-05 06:53:01 ROOF INFORMATION NOT PROVIDED       THE PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO BE REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF   RECORD AND SUBMITTED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. THIS IS   TYPICALLY SUBMITTED WITH THE ROOF SUB PERMIT   APPLICATION.                 Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET Rev No 5 Status P Date 2017-08-10 Cont ID   Sent By shill Date 2017-08-10 Time 13:01 Rev Time 0.00 Received By shill Date 2017-08-10 Time 13:01 Sent To   Notes 2017-08-10 13:01:56 NEW SHEETS VERIFIED, ALL TRADES         Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET Rev No 4 Status P Date 2017-08-08 Cont ID   Sent By shill Date 2017-08-08 Time 08:43 Rev Time 0.00 Received By shill Date 2017-08-08 Time 08:43 Sent To   Notes 2017-08-08 09:23:35 PAPER PAGES 6.11, 6.12, 6.13   NEW SHEETS VERIFIED   ORIGINAL SOILS VERIFIED         Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET Rev No 3 Status F Date 2017-07-28 Cont ID   Sent By shill Date 2017-07-28 Time 10:33 Rev Time 0.00 Received By shill Date 2017-07-28 Time 10:33 Sent To   Notes 2017-07-28 07:33:09 SOILS REPORT DATED 1/6/17 IS DIGITALLY SIGNED AND   SEALED; REQUESTED THAT THE OTHERS BE REMOVED (OR   VERSIONED).       SIGNATURE REVIEW REQUIRED FOR REVIEW CYCLE #5                 2017-07-20 12:56:22 MECHANICAL DIG/SIGS VERIFIED. CCOLE- 7/20/2017 Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET Rev No 2 Status F Date 2017-07-19 Cont ID   Sent By shill Date 2017-07-19 Time 07:43 Rev Time 0.00 Received By shill Date 2017-07-19 Time 07:43 Sent To   Notes 2017-07-17 09:34:49 MECH DIG/SIGS VERIFIED- CCOLE   7/17/17 2017-07-12 13:05:00 SIGNATURE REVIEW REVISED 7/12/17, S.HILL       NEW SHEETS SUBMITTED FOR 4TH REVIEW CYCLE NEED REVIEW,   IF APPLICABLE       THE SOILS IS NOT DIGITALLY SIGNED AND SEALED. EITHER   UPLOAD A DIGITALLY SIGNED AND SEALED SOILS REPORT OR   THE ORIGINAL PAPER SIGNED AND SEALED SOILS REPORT WILL   BE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE.       CIVIL PAGES OK   STRUCTUAL PLAN PAGES OK   ARCHITECTURAL PLAN PAGES OK   FIRE ALARM, FIRE PROTECTION PAGES OK                                                         Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET Rev No 1 Status F Date 2017-06-16 Cont ID   Sent By shill Date 2017-06-16 Time 08:25 Rev Time 0.00 Received By jpearson Date 2017-06-16 Time 08:25 Sent To   Notes 2017-06-16 08:25:27 ELECTRICAL SHEETS APPROVED. 2016-08-17 15:14:09 SIGNATURE REVIEW REVISED 6/23/17, S.HILL       NEW SHEETS SUBMITTED FOR 3RD REVIEW CYCLE NEED REVIEW       STRUCTURAL REPORT (SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS FOLDER)   PREPARED BY ALISINA MALEK, PE HAS A DIGITAL SIGNATURE   WITH AN ERROR. CORRECT AND RESUBMIT.       THE SOILS IS NOT DIGITALLY SIGNED AND SEALED. EITHER   UPLOAD A DIGITALLY SIGNED AND SEALED SOILS REPORT OR   THE ORIGINAL PAPER SIGNED AND SEALED SOILS REPORT WILL   BE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE.       CIVIL PAGES OK   STRUCTUAL PLAN PAGES OK   ARCHITECTURAL PLAN PAGES OK   FIRE ALARM, FIRE PROTECTION PAGES OK                                                         Review Stop THRESHOLD THRESHOLD INSPECTOR DOCUMENTS Rev No 5 Status N Date 2017-08-10 Cont ID   Sent By shill Date 2017-08-10 Time 13:06 Rev Time 0.00 Received By shill Date 2017-08-10 Time 13:06 Sent To   Notes 2017-08-10 13:07:25 APPLICANT ELECTS TO USE CITY INSPECTORS AT THIS TIME   PER KEN CONRAD, RESIDENT INSPECTOR IS VOLUNTARY FOR   THIS BUILDING (NOT THRESHOLD) Review Stop THRESHOLD THRESHOLD INSPECTOR DOCUMENTS Rev No 4 Status F Date 2017-08-07 Cont ID   Sent By shill Date 2017-08-07 Time 14:20 Rev Time 0.00 Received By shill Date 2017-08-07 Time 14:20 Sent To   Notes 2017-08-07 14:37:50 ****CORRECTIONS****       SAMANTHA HILL   BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER   [email protected]   561-805-6724       FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014)   FBC B = FBC BUILDING   FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING   FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY   FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION       WASEEN QUADRI, PE HAS BEEN APPROVED BY K.CONRAD   GISELLE BARRERA, BN7157 HAS BEEN PRELIMINARILY APPROVED   BY K.CONRAD PENDING RECEIPT OF RESUME       AS RESIDENT INSPECTOR IS VOLUNTARY, IT IS POSSIBLE THAT   THIS PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT   ALL INSPECTIONS WILL BE PERFORMED BY CITY STAFF UNTIL   APPLICANT PROVIDES ALL REQUIRED RESIDENT INSPECTOR   DOCUMENTS.       GENERAL COMMENT: NOTARIAL CERTIFICATES AND NOTARY   PRACTICE TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW, WHETHER   SPECIFICALLY MENTIONED IN THIS LIST OR NOT. NEARLY   EVERY PAGE HAS AN ERROR. THIS INFORMATION (ACCEPTABLE   METHODS FOR NOTARIAL CERTIFICATE, OTHER REQUIREMENTS)   IS READILY AVAILABLE ONLINE. TO EXPEDITE REVIEW, PRIOR   TO SUBMITTING THE AGREEMENTS TO ME FOR REVIEW,   APPLICANT IS TO CONFIRM THAT THIS BASIC INFORMATION IS   CORRECT.       PLEASE RESOLVE THE FOLLOWING ISSUES WITH DOCUMENT "B.1   SPECIAL INSPECTOR AGREEMENT.PDF" (SI AGREEMENT FOR   PERMIT #16070916):       1. AS DISCUSSED WITH CHARLES DURING A PRELIMINARY   REVIEW OF THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR AGREEMENT, THE   INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE IS REQUIRED TO BE NOTARIZED.   GISELLE BARRERA HAS SIGNED THE AGREEMENT, BUT HER   SIGNATURE IS NOT NOTARIZED.       THE PAGE WITH WASEEM QUADRI, PE'S SIGNATURE MAY REMAIN   IN THE PACKAGE. ADD ANOTHER PAGE WITH GISELLE BARRERA'S   NOTARIZED SIGNATURE. ENGINEER SIGNS AT THE TOP OF EACH   INSPECTOR PAGE.       2. THE NOTARIAL CERTIFICATE FOR CONTRACTOR STATES THAT   "LEN RICARDO SAEZ" SIGNED, BUT MR. SAEZ APPEARS TO BE   THE NOTARY, NOT THE CONTRACTOR. PROVIDE A PERMIT   APPLICATION, NOTARIZED BY THE CONTRACTOR (THIS   APPLICATION IS STILL "TBD" IN OUR SYSTEM), AND PROVIDE   THE CONTRACTOR'S NOTARIZED SIGNATURE ON THE SPECIAL   INSPECTOR AGREEMENT.       3. PLEASE REMOVE THE FORM "AFFIDAVIT CERTIFICATE OF   CODE COMPLIANCE". THIS IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED   AFTER CONSTRUCTION, BEFORE C.O.       4. I AM UNABLE TO LOCATE A RESUME FOR THE PROPOSED   INSPECTOR, GISELLE BARRERA.       5. I AM UNABLE TO LOCATE A RESUME OF EXPERIENCE FOR THE   PROPOSED CONTRACTOR, CHRISTOPHER MORAN, LYNX   CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT.       6. ONLY ONE INSPECTOR HAS SIGNED THE AGREEMENT. IN OUR   EXPERIENCE, A BACKUP INSPECTOR IS RECOMMEDED AS NO   OTHER INSPECTOR WILL BE PERMITTED ON THE JOB WITHOUT   PRIOR APPROVAL. AS DISCUSSED WITH CHARLES, SOME   COMPANIES HAVE ALL OF THEIR (LICENSED) EMPLOYEES SIGN   THE AGREEMENT. WHETHER THIS WILL BE A RECOMMENDATION OR   A REQUIREMENT WILL BE AT KEN CONRAD'S DISCRETION. NOTE   THAT ADDITIONAL INSPECTORS MAY SIGN ON AT ANY TIME, BUT   PRIOR TO PERFORMING INSPECTIONS ON THIS PROJECT.       7. AS DISCUSSED, A COMPLETE THRESHOLD PACKAGE IS   REQUIRED. AFTER A COMPLETE PACKAGE IS PROVIDED, THE   PACKAGE WILL BE FORWARDED TO KEN CONRAD FOR APPROVAL.       IF INFORMATION IS SENT VIA EMAIL RATHER THAN VIA   RESUBMITTAL, PLEASE SEND A COMPLETE PACKAGE - SIGNED   AGREEMENTS, RESUMES FOR ALL PARTIES. THE COMPLETE   PACKAGE WILL BE FORWARDED TO KEN CONRAD. HE DOES NOT   HAVE ACCESS TO PROJECTDOX.       (NOTE - THRESHOLD INSPECTION PLAN OK, LOCATED IN   SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS "THRESHOLD INSPECTION GUID LINE")       ***************************************************   REVIEW FOR DOCUMENTS "B.2 RESIDENT INSPECTOR   AGREEMENT.PDF", "B.3 RESIDENT INSPECTOR AGREEMENT",   "B.4 RESIDENT INSPECTOR AGREEMENT".       1. CLARIFY RELATIONSHIP OF YASMIN K QUADRI (NOTARY) TO   WASEEM QUADRI, PE. THIS MAY BE DONE WITH A LETTER WHICH   DOES NOT NEED TO BE NOTARIZED, BUT PLEASE INCLUDE IN   THE AGREEMENT, FLORIDA STATUTE 117.107(11).       2. NOTARIAL CERTIFICATE FOR THE ENGINEER IS INCORRECT;   THIS LACKS A NAME ON THE LINE WHICH STATES WHO SIGNED   THE DOCUMENT.       3. NOTARIAL CERTIFICATE FOR THE CONTRACTOR IS   INCORRECT; NOTARY'S NAME IS INCLUDED RATHER THAN   CONTRACTOR'S NAME. CONTRACTOR'S NOTARIZED SIGNATURE IS   REQUIRED FOR THE AGREEMENT.       4. OWNER SIGNATURE OK.       5. ONLY THE ENGINEER, WASEEM QUADRI, PE HAS SIGNED THE   RESIDENT INSPECTOR AGREEMENT. CONFIRM THAT NO OTHER   INDIVIDUALS WITH BE PERFORMING INSPECTIONS FOR THIS   PERMIT, OR ADD ANY PROPOSED INSPECTORS TO THE   AGREEMENT. USE PAGE 1 FOR EACH INSPECTOR. A RESUME IS   REQUIRED FOR EACH.       6. A RESIDENT INSPECTOR INSPECTION PLAN IS REQUIRED. IT   IS POSSIBLE THAT THIS MAY BE A PROVISO ITEM.                 Review Stop THRESHOLD THRESHOLD INSPECTOR DOCUMENTS Rev No 3 Status F Date 2017-07-28 Cont ID   Sent By shill Date 2017-07-28 Time 10:34 Rev Time 0.00 Received By shill Date 2017-07-28 Time 10:34 Sent To   Notes 2017-07-28 10:38:20 IF AVAILABLE, PLEASE UPLOAD THE THRESHOLD PACKAGE TO   PROJECTDOX WHEN RESUBMITTING.       SI AGREEMENT SIGNED BY ALL PARTIES   RESUMES FOR SI, INSPECTORS, CONTRACTOR   COPIES OF LICENSES (OR PRINT PAGE FROM   WWW.MYFLORIDALICENSE.COM)       THIS MAY ALSO BE SENT VIA EMAIL ([email protected]). AFTER   RECEIPT OF THE COMPLETE PACKAGE, IT WILL BE FORWARDED   TO KEN CONRAD FOR FINAL APPROVAL. PRIOR TO   CONSTRUCTION, SCHEDULE A PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH   CONTRACTOR, KEN CONRAD, AND SI.       PLEASE ADVISE, IS APPLICANT USING A RESIDENT INSPECTOR   FOR THE NON-THRESHOLD BUILDINGS? IF YES, PLEASE PROVIDE   THAT AGREEMENT AS WELL.                     Review Stop THRESHOLD THRESHOLD INSPECTOR DOCUMENTS Rev No 2 Status F Date 2017-07-12 Cont ID   Sent By shill Date 2017-07-12 Time 13:02 Rev Time 0.00 Received By shill Date 2017-07-12 Time 13:02 Sent To   Notes 2017-07-12 13:03:17 ****CORRECTIONS****   THRESHOLD INSPECTOR REQUIRED FOR PERMIT 16070916   (BUILDING 1; 4 STORIES) ONLY   RESIDENT INSPECTOR FOR OTHER BUILDINGS RECOMMENDED BUT   OPTIONAL       SAMANTHA HILL   BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER   [email protected]   561-805-6724       THIS PERMIT INCLUDES FOUR BUILDINGS:       PERMIT #16070916 906 17TH STREET - 68 UNITS, 4 STORIES   (BUILDING 1)   PERMIT #16071059 808 17TH STREET - 45 UNITS, 3 STORIES   (BUILDING 2)   PERMIT #16071058 811 15TH STREET - 6 UNITS, 1 STORY   (BUILDING 3)   PERMIT #16070880 805 15TH STREET - 6 UNITS, 1 STORY   (BUILDING 4)       GOVERNING CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (FBC 2014)       1. FLORIDA STATUTE 553.71, THIS BUILDING QUALIFIES AS A   THRESHOLD BUILDING; ANY BUILDING WHICH IS GREATER THAN   (3) STORIES OR 50 FT. IN HEIGHT, OR WHICH HAS AN   ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION AS DEFINED IN THE   FLORIDA BUILDING CODE WHICH EXCEEDS 5,000 SF IN AREA   AND AN OCCUPANT CONTENT OF GREATER THAN 500 PERSONS.       2. AS A THRESHOLD BUILDING, THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED:       A. THRESHOLD INSPECTION PLAN; FS 553.79(5)(A), CITY OF   WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING   CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION 109.3.6.1. THE   ENFORCING AGENCY SHALL REQUIRE A SPECIAL INSPECTOR TO   PERFORM STRUCTURAL INSPECTIONS ON A THRESHOLD BUILDING   PURSUANT TO A STRUCTURAL INSPECTION PLAN PREPARED BY   THE ENGINEER OR ARCHITECT OF RECORD. THE STRUCTURAL   INSPECTION PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY   THE ENFORCING AGENCY BEFORE THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING   PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A THRESHOLD BUILDING.   THE PURPOSE OF THE STRUCTURAL INSPECTION PLAN IS TO   PROVIDE SPECIFIC INSPECTION PROCEDURES AND SCHEDULES SO   THAT THE BUILDING CAN BE ADEQUATELY INSPECTED FOR   COMPLIANCE WITH THE PERMITTED DOCUMENTS.       B. THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: WPB AMENDMENT 109.3.6.2 W.P.B.   CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT REQUESTS FOR THRESHOLD   BUILDINGS A SPECIAL INSPECTOR AS REQUIRED BY FS   553.79(5)(A) TO THE MINIMUM INSPECTIONS REQUIRED BY   THIS CODE. THE THRESHOLD INSPECTION FORMS ARE REQUIRED   TO BE FILED OUT BY ALL PARTIES, NOTARIZED AND RETURNED   TO THIS OFFICE, REVIEWED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO PERMIT   ISSUANCE. CONTACT KEN CONRAD, MANAGER OF THE SPECIAL   INSPECTOR PROGRAM, AT 561-805-6666 FOR ADDITIONAL   INFORMATION.   FORMS WERE SENT TO: [email protected] ON 9/29/16.       C. SPECIAL INSPECTOR RESUME': PROVIDE A RESUME' OF   INSPECTION EXPERIENCE ON PREVIOUS PROJECTS FOR REVIEW   BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OR HIS DESIGNEE. AFTER THE   RESUME' IS REVIEWED, AN INTERVIEW WILL BE SCHEDULED.   UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES WILL AN INSPECTOR BE INTERVIEWED   FOR WORK WITHOUT FIRST MEETING THE ABOVE CRITERIA. THE   RESUME' IS TO BE SUBMITTED TO KEN CONRAD (AND COPY   SAMANTHA HILL), 561-805-6666, [email protected],   [email protected]       ALL PROSPECTIVE INSPECTORS ARE TO BE APPROVED BY THE   CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR AND ALL ARE REQUIRED TO SIGN   THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR AGREEMENT.       D. CONTRACTOR RESUME': PROVIDE A JOB SUMMARY OR HISTORY   FOR THIS TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION. THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED TO   KEN CONRAD, (PLEASE COPY SAMANTHA HILL) VIA E-MAIL   ([email protected], [email protected]).       E. PERMIT DOCUMENTS: PAPER SUBMITTALS REQUIRE THREE   SIGNED AND SEALED (IF APPLICABLE) ORIGINAL SETS OF ALL   DOCUMENTS.       F. FS553.79(7)(D)ALL PLANS FOR THE BUILDING WHICH ARE   REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE ARCHITECT OR   ENGINEER OF RECORD CONTAIN A STATEMENT THAT, TO THE   BEST OF THE ARCHITECT'S OR ENGINEER'S KNOWLEDGE, THE   PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE   MINIMUM BUILDING CODES AND THE APPLICABLE FIRESAFETY   STANDARDS AS DETERMINED BY THE LOCAL AUTHORITY IN   ACCORDANCE WITH THIS CHAPTER AND CHAPTER 633. CONFIRM   ALL APPLICABLE PAGES INCLUDE THE REQUIRED STATEMENT.       3. ADVISORY ONLY; PER FS 553.79, ALL SHORING/RE-SHORE   ENGINEERING IS TO BE REVIEWED BY ENGINEER OF RECORD AND   THREE SIGNED AND SEALED ORIGINAL SETS ARE TO BE   SUBMITTED FOR PLAN REVIEW. THE SHORING/RESHORE   ENGINEERING IS TO BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO   INSPECTION. THE CITY APPROVED (CITY STAMPED)   SHORING/RE-SHORE ENGINEERING IS TO BE AVAILABLE ON THE   JOB AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION.       4. ADVISORY ONLY; PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, A GUARD RAIL   DETAIL IS TO BE SUBMITTED FOR PLAN REVIEW. THIS SHOULD   BE SUBMITTED WITH THE SHORING/RESHORE ENGINEERING.       5. SPECIAL INSPECTOR REQUIRED FOR BUILDING 1. DEPENDING   ON HOW AGGRESSIVE THE CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE IS,   APPLICANT MAY WANT TO CONSIDER USING THE SAME INSPECTOR   FOR BUILDINGS 2, 3, 4 (PER KEN CONRAD, CHIEF BUILDING   INSPECTOR). PLEASE CALL ME IF YOU WISH TO DISCUSS.                         Review Stop THRESHOLD THRESHOLD INSPECTOR DOCUMENTS Rev No 1 Status F Date 2016-09-29 Cont ID   Sent By shill Date 2016-09-29 Time 06:38 Rev Time 0.00 Received By shill Date 2016-09-17 Time 15:31 Sent To   Notes 2016-09-29 06:40:15 ****CORRECTIONS****   THRESHOLD INSPECTOR REQUIRED FOR PERMIT 16070916   (BUILDING 1; 4 STORIES) ONLY   RESIDENT INSPECTOR FOR OTHER BUILDINGS RECOMMENDED BUT   OPTIONAL       SAMANTHA HILL   BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER   [email protected]   561-805-6724       THIS PERMIT INCLUDES FOUR BUILDINGS:       PERMIT #16070916 906 17TH STREET - 68 UNITS, 4 STORIES   (BUILDING 1)   PERMIT #16071059 808 17TH STREET - 45 UNITS, 3 STORIES   (BUILDING 2)   PERMIT #16071058 811 15TH STREET - 6 UNITS, 1 STORY   (BUILDING 3)   PERMIT #16070880 805 15TH STREET - 6 UNITS, 1 STORY   (BUILDING 4)       GOVERNING CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (FBC 2014)       1. FLORIDA STATUTE 553.71, THIS BUILDING QUALIFIES AS A   THRESHOLD BUILDING; ANY BUILDING WHICH IS GREATER THAN   (3) STORIES OR 50 FT. IN HEIGHT, OR WHICH HAS AN   ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION AS DEFINED IN THE   FLORIDA BUILDING CODE WHICH EXCEEDS 5,000 SF IN AREA   AND AN OCCUPANT CONTENT OF GREATER THAN 500 PERSONS.       2. AS A THRESHOLD BUILDING, THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED:       A. THRESHOLD INSPECTION PLAN; FS 553.79(5)(A), CITY OF   WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING   CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION 109.3.6.1. THE   ENFORCING AGENCY SHALL REQUIRE A SPECIAL INSPECTOR TO   PERFORM STRUCTURAL INSPECTIONS ON A THRESHOLD BUILDING   PURSUANT TO A STRUCTURAL INSPECTION PLAN PREPARED BY   THE ENGINEER OR ARCHITECT OF RECORD. THE STRUCTURAL   INSPECTION PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY   THE ENFORCING AGENCY BEFORE THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING   PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A THRESHOLD BUILDING.   THE PURPOSE OF THE STRUCTURAL INSPECTION PLAN IS TO   PROVIDE SPECIFIC INSPECTION PROCEDURES AND SCHEDULES SO   THAT THE BUILDING CAN BE ADEQUATELY INSPECTED FOR   COMPLIANCE WITH THE PERMITTED DOCUMENTS.       B. THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: WPB AMENDMENT 109.3.6.2 W.P.B.   CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT REQUESTS FOR THRESHOLD   BUILDINGS A SPECIAL INSPECTOR AS REQUIRED BY FS   553.79(5)(A) TO THE MINIMUM INSPECTIONS REQUIRED BY   THIS CODE. THE THRESHOLD INSPECTION FORMS ARE REQUIRED   TO BE FILED OUT BY ALL PARTIES, NOTARIZED AND RETURNED   TO THIS OFFICE, REVIEWED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO PERMIT   ISSUANCE. CONTACT KEN CONRAD, MANAGER OF THE SPECIAL   INSPECTOR PROGRAM, AT 561-805-6666 FOR ADDITIONAL   INFORMATION.   FORMS WERE SENT TO: [email protected] ON 9/29/16.       C. SPECIAL INSPECTOR RESUME': PROVIDE A RESUME' OF   INSPECTION EXPERIENCE ON PREVIOUS PROJECTS FOR REVIEW   BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OR HIS DESIGNEE. AFTER THE   RESUME' IS REVIEWED, AN INTERVIEW WILL BE SCHEDULED.   UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES WILL AN INSPECTOR BE INTERVIEWED   FOR WORK WITHOUT FIRST MEETING THE ABOVE CRITERIA. THE   RESUME' IS TO BE SUBMITTED TO KEN CONRAD (AND COPY   SAMANTHA HILL), 561-805-6666, [email protected],   [email protected]       ALL PROSPECTIVE INSPECTORS ARE TO BE APPROVED BY THE   CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR AND ALL ARE REQUIRED TO SIGN   THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR AGREEMENT.       D. CONTRACTOR RESUME': PROVIDE A JOB SUMMARY OR HISTORY   FOR THIS TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION. THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED TO   KEN CONRAD, (PLEASE COPY SAMANTHA HILL) VIA E-MAIL   ([email protected], [email protected]).       E. PERMIT DOCUMENTS: PAPER SUBMITTALS REQUIRE THREE   SIGNED AND SEALED (IF APPLICABLE) ORIGINAL SETS OF ALL   DOCUMENTS.       F. FS553.79(7)(D)ALL PLANS FOR THE BUILDING WHICH ARE   REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE ARCHITECT OR   ENGINEER OF RECORD CONTAIN A STATEMENT THAT, TO THE   BEST OF THE ARCHITECT'S OR ENGINEER'S KNOWLEDGE, THE   PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE   MINIMUM BUILDING CODES AND THE APPLICABLE FIRESAFETY   STANDARDS AS DETERMINED BY THE LOCAL AUTHORITY IN   ACCORDANCE WITH THIS CHAPTER AND CHAPTER 633. CONFIRM   ALL APPLICABLE PAGES INCLUDE THE REQUIRED STATEMENT.       3. ADVISORY ONLY; PER FS 553.79, ALL SHORING/RE-SHORE   ENGINEERING IS TO BE REVIEWED BY ENGINEER OF RECORD AND   THREE SIGNED AND SEALED ORIGINAL SETS ARE TO BE   SUBMITTED FOR PLAN REVIEW. THE SHORING/RESHORE   ENGINEERING IS TO BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO   INSPECTION. THE CITY APPROVED (CITY STAMPED)   SHORING/RE-SHORE ENGINEERING IS TO BE AVAILABLE ON THE   JOB AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION.       4. ADVISORY ONLY; PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, A GUARD RAIL   DETAIL IS TO BE SUBMITTED FOR PLAN REVIEW. THIS SHOULD   BE SUBMITTED WITH THE SHORING/RESHORE ENGINEERING.       5. SPECIAL INSPECTOR REQUIRED FOR BUILDING 1. DEPENDING   ON HOW AGGRESSIVE THE CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE IS,   APPLICANT MAY WANT TO CONSIDER USING THE SAME INSPECTOR   FOR BUILDINGS 2, 3, 4 (PER KEN CONRAD, CHIEF BUILDING   INSPECTOR). PLEASE CALL ME IF YOU WISH TO DISCUSS.                         Review Stop Z ZONING Rev No 6 Status P Date 2017-08-10 Cont ID   Sent By jroach Date 2017-08-10 Time 14:16 Rev Time 0.00 Received By jroach Date 2017-08-10 Time 14:16 Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop Z ZONING Rev No 5 Status F Date 2017-08-08 Cont ID   Sent By jroach Date 2017-08-08 Time 13:00 Rev Time 0.00 Received By jroach Date 2017-08-08 Time 13:00 Sent To   Notes 2017-08-08 13:00:51 ZONING PLAN REVIEW   ___________________________________________       DATE OF REVIEW: 08.08.2017   PERMIT NO.: 16070880, 16070916, 16071058, 16071059   ___________________________________________       REVIEW STATUS: FAILED   ___________________________________________       PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING PLAN   REVIEW COMMENTS:       1. AT THE PROPOSED CROSSWALK BETWEEN BUILDINGS #2 AND   #4, THE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS ON BOTH SIDES OF THE SIDEWALK   SHALL BE EXPANDED TO A MINIMUM OF FIVE (5) FEET IN   WIDTH. ADDITIONALLY, THE SOUTHERN-MOST PROPOSED GUMBO   LIMBO SHALL BE PLACED IN THE ISLAND OPPOSITE THE   PROPOSED TRAFFIC SIGN.       2. PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 187-16, ALL IMPROVEMENTS   (INCLUDING UTILITIES AND REQUIRED SCREENING) SHALL BE   MODIFIED TO COMPLY WITH THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT PERMITTED   WITHIN THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE. THIS COMMENT WAS ISSUED   PREVIOUSLY AND HAS NOT BEEN FULLY ADDRESSED. THE   TRANSFORMER AND ASSOCIATED SCREENING LOCATED ON THE   NORTHWEST CORNER OF DIVISION AVENUE AND 15TH STREET   (L.A. KIRKSEY) SHALL BE RELOCATED TO COMPLY WITH SUCH   PROVISION.       3. SOME LIGHT POLES ARE SHOWN IN THE MIDDLE OF WALKWAYS   AND OTHERS CONFLICT WITH LANDSCAPING. THIS COMMENT WAS   ISSUED PREVIOUSLY AND HAS NOT BEEN ADDRESSED.       4. THE LANDSCAPE PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED UNDER A   SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT APPLICATION. THIS COMMENT WAS   ISSUED PREVIOUSLY AND HAS NOT BEEN ADDRESSED. PLEASE   NOTE THAT THE LANDSCAPE PLANS SUBMITTED WITH THE   BUILDING PERMIT PLANS DO NOT MATCH THE LATEST SUBMITTAL   MADE FOR THE MINOR PD AMENDMENT. ALL PLANS NEED TO BE   CONSISTENT.       5. ALL SITE LIGHTING SHALL BE DESIGNED SO AS NOT TO   EXCEED 0.5 FOOTCANDLES, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION   94-310(D), WHEN MEASURED AT THE BOUNDARY OF THE RPD.   THIS COMMENT WAS ISSUED PREVIOUSLY AND HAS NOT BEEN   ADDRESSED.   ___________________________________________       PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED   MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS.   ___________________________________________       QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:       JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER   CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH   DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION   401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147   WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402       P: 561.822.1448   F: 561.822.1460       E: [email protected]       W: WPB.ORG     Review Stop Z ZONING Rev No 4 Status F Date 2017-07-31 Cont ID   Sent By jroach Date 2017-07-31 Time 11:33 Rev Time 0.00 Received By jroach Date 2017-07-31 Time 11:33 Sent To   Notes 2017-07-31 11:33:16 ZONING PLAN REVIEW   ___________________________________________       DATE OF REVIEW: 07.31.2017   PERMIT NO.: 16070880, 16070916, 16071058, 16071059   ADDRESS: 805 15TH STREET, 906 17TH STREET, 811 15TH   STREET, 808 17TH STREET   CONTRACTOR/CONTACT:   TELEPHONE NO.:   SCOPE OF REVIEW: NEW MULTIFAMILY   ___________________________________________       REVIEW STATUS: FAILED   ___________________________________________       PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING PLAN   REVIEW COMMENTS:       1. LANDSCAPE PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED UNDER A SEPARATE   LANDSCAPE PERMIT APPLICATION.       2. AS THE PLANS HAVE BEEN REVISED SINCE THE ADOPTION OF   RESOLUTION NO. 187-16, A MINOR AMENDMENT TO THE DUNBAR   VILLAGE RPD SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY THE   DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION. IT   SEEMS THAT THE FOLLOWING MODIFICATIONS HAVE BEEN   MADE...       A. REMOVAL OF THE POOL.       B. RELOCATION OF STEPS INTO UNITS FACING DIVISION   AVENUE ? IT WAS EXPRESSED TO STAFF THAT THE ISSUES THAT   AROSE WITH SILVER PALM PLACE WOULD NOT BE EXPERIENCED   AT ROYAL PALM PLACE, AND THAT THE LOCATION OF THE STEPS   WOULD REMAIN AT THE ENTRANCES INTO THE UNITS.       C. MODIFICATION TO ON-STREET PARKING ALONG INTERNAL   NORTH/SOUTH ROAD.       D. REDUCTION IN THE AMOUNT OF PARKING (SEVERAL   ON-STREET PARKING SPACES NO LONGER PROPOSED).       E. MODIFICATION TO THE INGRESS/EGRESS POINT AT L.A.   KIRKSEY (15TH STREET). HAS THIS BEEN APPROVED BY   ENGINEERING? I THOUGHT THIS WAS TO BE A RIGHT-IN AND   RIGHT-OUT ONLY.       3. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMIT FOR   BUILDINGS #3 & #4 (STRUCTURES FRONTING 15TH STREET),   VARIATION SHALL BE PROVIDED TO DIFFERENTIATE THEM FROM   ONE ANOTHER. SUCH VARIATIONS DO NOT HAVE TO BE   SUBSTANTIAL STRUCTURAL MODIFICATIONS, BUT MAY CONSIST   OF DIFFERENT ARCHITECTURAL DETAILING, RAILINGS,   COLUMNS, ETC. VARIATIONS SHOULD BE PROVIDED BETWEEN   EACH 3-UNIT CLUSTER.       4. THE LOCATION OF ALL IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING BUT NOT   LIMITED TO ABOVE-GROUND UTILITIES AND REQUIRED   SCREENING, SHALL BE MODIFIED ACCORDINGLY TO COMPLY WITH   MAXIMUM HEIGHT PERMITTED WITHIN THE VISIBILITY   TRIANGLE.       5. SIDEWALK CROSSING THAT OCCURS BETWEEN THE HANDICAP   SPACES (NORTH OF BUILDINGS III AND IV) SHOULD BE   RECONFIGURED TO PROVIDE AN APPROPRIATE MID-BLOCK   CROSSING WITH LANDSCAPE ISLANDS, ETC.       6. CIVIL PLANS DO NOT REFLECT THE TWO (2) TREE GRATES   PROPOSED ALONG THE ON-STREET PARKING, SOUTHWEST OF THE   LEASING CENTER.       7. ALL SITE LIGHTING SHALL BE DESIGNED SO AS NOT TO   EXCEED 0.5 FOOTCANDLES, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION   94-310(D), WHEN MEASURED AT THE BOUNDARY OF THE RPD.       8. SOME LIGHT POLES ARE SHOWN IN THE MIDDLE OF WALKWAYS   AND OTHER CONFLICT WITH LANDSCAPING.       9. THE APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER SHALL SUBMIT FOR A TREE   ALTERATION PERMIT, PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A LANDSCAPE   PERMIT. THE TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL INCLUDE A TREE   SURVEY OF EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED.   ___________________________________________       PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED   MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS.   ___________________________________________       QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:       JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER   CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH   DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION   401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147   WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402       P: 561.822.1448   F: 561.822.1460       E: [email protected]       W: WPB.ORG     Review Stop Z ZONING Rev No 3 Status F Date 2017-07-17 Cont ID   Sent By jroach Date 2017-07-17 Time 13:04 Rev Time 0.00 Received By jroach Date 2017-07-17 Time 13:04 Sent To   Notes 2017-07-17 13:04:24 ZONING PLAN REVIEW   ___________________________________________       DATE OF REVIEW: 07.17.2017   PERMIT NO.: 16070880, 16070916, 16071058, 16071059   ADDRESS: 805 15TH STREET, 906 17TH STREET, 811 15TH   STREET, 808 17TH STREET   CONTRACTOR/CONTACT:   TELEPHONE NO.:   SCOPE OF REVIEW: NEW MULTIFAMILY   ___________________________________________       REVIEW STATUS: FAILED   ___________________________________________       PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING PLAN   REVIEW COMMENTS:       1. LANDSCAPE PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED UNDER A SEPARATE   LANDSCAPE PERMIT APPLICATION. IF THE DESIRE IS TO   OBTAIN CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY AT DIFFERENT TIMES FOR   EACH BUILDING, A LANDSCAPE PHASING PLAN MAY NEED TO BE   DEVELOPED TO DISTINGUISH WHICH LANDSCAPING IS REQUIRED   TO BE INSTALLED WITH EACH BUILDING. STAFF IS WILLING TO   DISCUSS THIS ISSUE FURTHER IF NEEDED.       2. AS THE PLANS HAVE BEEN REVISED SINCE THE ADOPTION OF   RESOLUTION NO. 187-16, A MINOR AMENDMENT TO THE DUNBAR   VILLAGE RPD SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY THE   DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION. IT   SEEMS THAT THE FOLLOWING MODIFICATIONS HAVE BEEN   MADE...       A. REMOVAL OF THE POOL.       B. RELOCATION OF STEPS INTO UNITS FACING DIVISION   AVENUE ? IT WAS EXPRESSED TO STAFF THAT THE ISSUES THAT   AROSE WITH SILVER PALM PLACE WOULD NOT BE EXPERIENCED   AT ROYAL PALM PLACE, AND THAT THE LOCATION OF THE STEPS   WOULD REMAIN AT THE ENTRANCES INTO THE UNITS.       C. MODIFICATION TO ON-STREET PARKING ALONG INTERNAL   NORTH/SOUTH ROAD.       D. REDUCTION IN THE AMOUNT OF PARKING (SEVERAL   ON-STREET PARKING SPACES NO LONGER PROPOSED).       E. MODIFICATION TO THE INGRESS/EGRESS POINT AT L.A.   KIRKSEY (15TH STREET). HAS THIS BEEN APPROVED BY   ENGINEERING? I THOUGHT THIS WAS TO BE A RIGHT-IN AND   RIGHT-OUT ONLY.       3. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMIT FOR   BUILDINGS #3 & #4 (STRUCTURES FRONTING 15TH STREET),   VARIATION SHALL BE PROVIDED TO DIFFERENTIATE THEM FROM   ONE ANOTHER. SUCH VARIATIONS DO NOT HAVE TO BE   SUBSTANTIAL STRUCTURAL MODIFICATIONS, BUT MAY CONSIST   OF DIFFERENT ARCHITECTURAL DETAILING, RAILINGS,   COLUMNS, ETC. VARIATIONS SHOULD BE PROVIDED BETWEEN   EACH 3-UNIT CLUSTER.       4. THE LOCATION OF ALL IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING BUT NOT   LIMITED TO ABOVE-GROUND UTILITIES AND REQUIRED   SCREENING, SHALL BE MODIFIED ACCORDINGLY TO COMPLY WITH   MAXIMUM HEIGHT PERMITTED WITHIN THE VISIBILITY   TRIANGLE.       5. SIDEWALK CROSSING AT DIVISION AVENUE DRIVEWAY   ENTRANCE SHOULD BE REMOVED - PEDESTRIANS SHOULD USE THE   CROSSING AT THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE. WHILE THE SIDEWALK   HAS BEEN RELOCATED, A DIVIDER MEDIAN HAS BEEN REMOVED   FROM THE ROW OF PARKING; PURSUANT TO THE CITY'S ZLDRS,   NO MORE THAN 10 CONIGUOUS PARKING SPACES SHALL OCCUR   WITH OUT THIS INSTALLATION OF A 5 FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPED   DIVIDER MEDIAN WITH SHADE TREE.       6. LOCATION OF THE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT NORTH OF THE   LEASING OFFICE, IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE ENTRANCE   INTO THE EXERCISE ROOM? MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT IS NOT TO   EXTEND MORE THAN FOUR (4) FEET INTO THE SETBACK.       7. PAVING PLANS DO NOT REFLECT THE TWO (2) TREE GRATES   PROPOSED ALONG THE ON-STREET PARKING, SOUTHWEST OF THE   LEASING CENTER.       8. POOL EQUIPMENT IS STILL BEING SHOWN ON THE SITE AND   LANDSCAPE PLANS, DESPITE THE REMOVAL OF THE POOL FROM   THE PROJECT.       10. ELEVATION D OF BUILDING II DOES NOT MATCH THE   FLOOR/SITE PLAN. THE PLANS INDICATE A DOUBLE-DOOR   EXITING THE EXERCISE ROOM ONTO 17TH STREET; THIS IS NOT   REFLECTED ON THE ELEVATION.       11. ELEVATION D OF BUILDING II INDICATES THAT THE   WINDOWS ALONG NORTH FA?ADE OF THE EXERCISE ROOM,   LEASING CENTER, ETC. ARE S-1 TYPE STOREFRONTS, WHICH   ARE IDENTIFIED AS HAVING A DOOR OPENING. ACCORDING TO   THE SITE PLAN, ONLY ONE OPENING IS TO HAVE A   DOUBLE-DOOR, WHILE THE OTHER OPENINGS APPEAR TO BE   FIXED STOREFRONT WINDOWS.       12. WHAT IS THE PROPOSED TREATMENT FOR THE FACES OF THE   VARIOUS RETAINING WALLS?       13. ALL SITE LIGHTING SHALL BE DESIGNED SO AS NOT TO   EXCEED 0.5 FOOTCANDLES, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION   94-310(D), WHEN MEASURED AT THE BOUNDARY OF THE RPD.       14. SOME LIGHT POLES ARE SHOWN IN THE MIDDLE OF   WALKWAYS, PARKING AREAS, ETC. ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS ARE   CONSISTENT AND THAT CONFLICTS AND INCONSISTENCIES ARE   ADDRESSED.       15. THE APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER SHALL SUBMIT FOR A   TREE ALTERATION PERMIT, PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A   LANDSCAPE PERMIT. THE TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL   INCLUDE A TREE SURVEY OF EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED.   ___________________________________________       PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED   MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS.   ___________________________________________       QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:       JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER   CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH   DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION   401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147   WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402       P: 561.822.1448   F: 561.822.1460       E: [email protected]       W: WPB.ORG     Review Stop Z ZONING Rev No 2 Status F Date 2017-06-14 Cont ID   Sent By jroach Date 2017-06-14 Time 10:18 Rev Time 0.00 Received By jroach Date 2017-06-14 Time 10:18 Sent To   Notes 2017-06-14 10:18:47 ZONING PLAN REVIEW   ___________________________________________       DATE OF REVIEW: 06.14.2017   PERMIT NO.: 16070880, 16070916, 16071058, 16071059   ADDRESS: 805 15TH STREET, 906 17TH STREET, 811 15TH   STREET, 808 17TH STREET   CONTRACTOR/CONTACT:   TELEPHONE NO.:   SCOPE OF REVIEW: NEW MULTIFAMILY   ___________________________________________       REVIEW STATUS: FAILED   ___________________________________________       PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING PLAN   REVIEW COMMENTS:       1. LANDSCAPE PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED UNDER A SEPARATE   LANDSCAPE PERMIT APPLICATION. IF THE DESIRE IS TO   OBTAIN CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY AT DIFFERENT TIMES FOR   EACH BUILDING, A LANDSCAPE PHASING PLAN MAY NEED TO BE   DEVELOPED TO DISTINGUISH WHICH LANDSCAPING IS REQUIRED   TO BE INSTALLED WITH EACH BUILDING. STAFF IS WILLING TO   DISCUSS THIS ISSUE FURTHER IF NEEDED.       2. AS THE PLANS HAVE BEEN REVISED SINCE THE ADOPTION OF   RESOLUTION NO. 187-16, A MINOR AMENDMENT TO THE DUNBAR   VILLAGE RPD SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY THE   DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION. IT   SEEMS THAT THE FOLLOWING MODIFICATIONS HAVE BEEN   MADE...       A. REMOVAL OF THE POOL.       B. RELOCATION OF STEPS INTO UNITS FACING DIVISION   AVENUE ? IT WAS EXPRESSED TO STAFF THAT THE ISSUES THAT   AROSE WITH SILVER PALM PLACE WOULD NOT BE EXPERIENCED   AT ROYAL PALM PLACE, AND THAT THE LOCATION OF THE STEPS   WOULD REMAIN AT THE ENTRANCES INTO THE UNITS.       C. MODIFICATION TO ON-STREET PARKING ALONG INTERNAL   NORTH/SOUTH ROAD.       D. REDUCTION IN THE AMOUNT OF PARKING (SEVERAL   ON-STREET PARKING SPACES NO LONGER PROPOSED).       E. MODIFICATION TO THE INGRESS/EGRESS POINT AT L.A.   KIRKSEY (15TH STREET). HAS THIS BEEN APPROVED BY   ENGINEERING? I THOUGHT THIS WAS TO BE A RIGHT-IN AND   RIGHT-OUT ONLY.       3. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMIT FOR   BUILDINGS #3 & #4 (STRUCTURES FRONTING 15TH STREET),   VARIATION SHALL BE PROVIDED TO DIFFERENTIATE THEM FROM   ONE ANOTHER. SUCH VARIATIONS DO NOT HAVE TO BE   SUBSTANTIAL STRUCTURAL MODIFICATIONS, BUT MAY CONSIST   OF DIFFERENT ARCHITECTURAL DETAILING, RAILINGS,   COLUMNS, ETC. VARIATIONS SHOULD BE PROVIDED BETWEEN   EACH 3-UNIT CLUSTER.       4. THE LOCATION OF ALL IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING BUT NOT   LIMITED TO ABOVE-GROUND UTILITIES AND REQUIRED   SCREENING, SHALL BE MODIFIED ACCORDINGLY TO COMPLY WITH   MAXIMUM HEIGHT PERMITTED WITHIN THE VISIBILITY   TRIANGLE.       5. SIDEWALK CROSSING AT DIVISION AVENUE DRIVEWAY   ENTRANCE SHOULD BE REMOVED?PEDESTRIANS SHOULD USE THE   CROSSING AT THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE.       6. LOCATION OF THE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT NORTH OF THE   LEASING OFFICE, IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE ENTRANCE   INTO THE EXERCISE ROOM? MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT IS NOT TO   EXTEND MORE THAN FOUR (4) FEET INTO THE SETBACK.       7. SITE PLAN, PAVING PLANS, ETC. DO NOT REFLECT THE TWO   (2) TREE GRATES PROPOSED ALONG THE ON-STREET PARKING,   SOUTHWEST OF THE LEASING CENTER.       8. POOL EQUIPMENT IS STILL BEING SHOWN ON THE SITE AND   LANDSCAPE PLANS, DESPITE THE REMOVAL OF THE POOL FROM   THE PROJECT.       9. THERE?S A LABEL ON THE SITE PLAN THAT INCORRECTLY   STATES THAT THERE ARE 143 OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES AND   22 ON-STREET PARKING SPACES?.THE DATA TABLE INDICATES   ONLY 156 PARKING SPACES.       10. ELEVATION D OF BUILDING II DOES NOT MATCH THE   FLOOR/SITE PLAN. THE PLANS INDICATE A DOUBLE-DOOR   EXITING THE EXERCISE ROOM ONTO 17TH STREET; THIS IS NOT   REFLECTED ON THE ELEVATION.       11. ELEVATION D OF BUILDING II INDICATES THAT THE   WINDOWS ALONG NORTH FA?ADE OF THE EXERCISE ROOM,   LEASING CENTER, ETC. ARE S-1 TYPE STOREFRONTS, WHICH   ARE IDENTIFIED AS HAVING A DOOR OPENING. ACCORDING TO   THE SITE PLAN, ONLY ONE OPENING IS TO HAVE A   DOUBLE-DOOR, WHILE THE OTHER OPENINGS APPEAR TO BE   FIXED STOREFRONT WINDOWS.       12. WHAT IS THE PROPOSED TREATMENT FOR THE FACES OF THE   VARIOUS RETAINING WALLS?       13. ALL SITE LIGHTING SHALL BE DESIGNED SO AS NOT TO   EXCEED 0.5 FOOTCANDLES, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION   94-310(D), WHEN MEASURED AT THE BOUNDARY OF THE RPD.       14. SOME LIGHT POLES ARE SHOWN IN THE MIDDLE OF   WALKWAYS, PARKING AREAS, ETC. ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS ARE   CONSISTENT AND THAT CONFLICTS AND INCONSISTENCIES ARE   ADDRESSED.       15. THE APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER SHALL SUBMIT FOR A   TREE ALTERATION PERMIT, PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A   LANDSCAPE PERMIT. THE TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL   INCLUDE A TREE SURVEY OF EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED.   ___________________________________________       PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED   MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS.   ___________________________________________       QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:       JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER   CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH   DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION   401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147   WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402       P: 561.822.1448   F: 561.822.1460       E: [email protected]       W: WPB.ORG     Review Stop Z ZONING Rev No 1 Status F Date 2016-10-03 Cont ID   Sent By jroach Date 2016-10-03 Time 14:24 Rev Time 0.00 Received By jroach Date 2016-10-03 Time 14:23 Sent To   Notes 2016-10-03 14:24:09 ZONING PLAN REVIEW   ___________________________________________       DATE OF REVIEW: 10.03.2016   PERMIT NO.: 16070880, 16070916, 16071058, 16071059   ADDRESS: 805 15TH STREET, 906 17TH STREET, 811 15TH   STREET, 808 17TH STREET   CONTRACTOR/CONTACT:   TELEPHONE NO.:   SCOPE OF REVIEW: NEW MULTIFAMILY   ___________________________________________       REVIEW STATUS: FAILED   ___________________________________________       PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING PLAN   REVIEW COMMENTS:       1. ALL ISSUES REGARDING GRADING, BUILDING ELEVATION,   ETC. THAT HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED IN RECENT MEETINGS SHALL   BE SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED.       2. LANDSCAPE PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED UNDER A SEPARATE   LANDSCAPE PERMIT APPLICATION. IF THE DESIRE IS TO   OBTAIN CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY AT DIFFERENT TIMES FOR   EACH BUILDING, A LANDSCAPE PHASING PLAN MAY NEED TO BE   DEVELOPED TO DISTINGUISH WHICH LANDSCAPING IS REQUIRED   TO BE INSTALLED WITH EACH BUILDING. STAFF IS WILLING TO   DISCUSS THIS ISSUE FURTHER IF NEEDED.       3. AS THE LANDSCAPE PLANS HAVE BEEN REVISED SINCE THE   ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 187-16, A MINOR AMENDMENT TO   THE DUNBAR VILLAGE RPD SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO AND   APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ?   PLANNING DIVISION.       4. ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS, THERE ARE NUMEROUS CONFLICTS   BETWEEN PROPOSED LANDSCAPING AND PROPOSED SITE   LIGHTING. ADDITIONALLY, SOME LIGHT POLES ARE SHOWN IN   THE MIDDLE OF WALKWAYS, PARKING AREAS, ETC. ENSURE THAT   ALL PLANS ARE CONSISTENT AND THAT CONFLICTS AND   INCONSISTENCIES ARE ADDRESSED.       5. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMIT FOR   BUILDINGS #3 & #4 (STRUCTURES FRONTING 15TH STREET),   VARIATION SHALL BE PROVIDED TO DIFFERENTIATE THEM FROM   ONE ANOTHER. SUCH VARIATIONS DO NOT HAVE TO BE   SUBSTANTIAL STRUCTURAL MODIFICATIONS, BUT MAY CONSIST   OF DIFFERENT ARCHITECTURAL DETAILING, RAILINGS,   COLUMNS, ETC. VARIATIONS SHOULD BE PROVIDED BETWEEN   EACH 3-UNIT CLUSTER.       6. THE APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER SHALL SUBMIT FOR A TREE   ALTERATION PERMIT, PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A LANDSCAPE   PERMIT. THE TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL INCLUDE A TREE   SURVEY OF EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED.       7. ALL SITE LIGHTING SHALL BE DESIGNED SO AS NOT TO   EXCEED 0.5 FOOTCANDLES, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION   94-310(D), WHEN MEASURED AT THE BOUNDARY OF THE RPD.       8. ALL PLANS SHALL ACCURATELY REFLECT VISIBILITY   TRIANGLES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF   SECTION 94-305(E). THE LOCATION OF ALL IMPROVEMENTS,   INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ABOVE-GROUND UTILITIES AND   REQUIRED SCREENING, SHALL BE MODIFIED ACCORDINGLY TO   COMPLY WITH MAXIMUM HEIGHT PERMITTED WITHIN THE   VISIBILITY TRIANGLE.   ___________________________________________       PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED   MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS.   ___________________________________________       QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:       JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER   CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH   DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION   401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147   WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402       P: 561.822.1448   F: 561.822.1460       E: [email protected]       W: WPB.ORG     Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved