Plan Review Details - Permit 16050792
Plan Review Stops For Permit 16050792
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2016-07-14 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2016-07-14 Time 11:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2016-07-14 Time 11:10 Sent To  
Notes
2016-07-14 11:34:42SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 ***PROVISOS***
  
 1. PERMIT ISSUED AT CONTRACTOR'S RISK
  
 THE PLAN SUBMITTED DOES NOT INCLUDE THE CALCULATIONS
 REQUESTED REGARDING NON RIGID SIGN (OR THE ISSUE OF
 PORTIONS OF LETTERS ACTING AS A CANTALEVER SUPPORTED ON
 ONE SIDE). THE FASTENING PATTERN PROPOSED DOES NOT
 APPEAR ADEQUATE AND ENGINEER HAS FAILED TO HELP ME TO
 UNDERSTAND THE RATIONALE BEHIND THE DESIGN. THE
 CALCULATIONS PROVIDED WERE FOR WIND PRESSURES ONLY,
 WHICH DOES NOT ADDRESS THE QUESTIONS RAISED IN PREVIOUS
 PLAN REVIEWS.
  
 A FASTENING PATTERN WAS PROVIDED, BUT FASTENERS ARE
 LACKING AT THE TOP LEFT SCRIPT PORTION OF THE LETTER
 CAPITAL "H" (BICKHAM SCRIPT FONT), THE BOTTOM LEFT
 PORTION OF THE LETTER CAPITAL "H", LOWER PORTION OF THE
 LOWER CASE "G".
  
 2. THE PLANS FROM SUBMITTAL #3 UTILIZE A DIFFERENT
 FASTENER THAN PREVIOUS REVIEWS. REVIEW #2 CALCULATIONS
 WERE FOR #14 SMS FOR PLYWOOD. SUBMITTAL #3 SPECIFIES A
 "3/16 (#10) THREADED STUDS WITH ADHESIVE LIQUID".
  
 THE SUBSTRATE IS NOT CLEAR. A THREADED STUD WITH
 ADHESIVE LIQUID IN A PLYWOOD SUBSTRATE DOES NOT APPEAR
 TO BE APPROPRIATE. IF THIS IS CONCRETE OR BLOCK, IT IS
 NOT CLEAR WHY CALCS FOR A PLYWOOD SUBSTRATE WERE
 SUBMITTED. NO MINIMUM EMBEDMENT WAS SPECIFIED. A
 BRAND/PRODUCT OR OTHER SPECIFICATION FOR THE "THREADED
 STUD" AND THE "ADHESIVE LIQUID" WERE NOT PROVIDED. DO
 THEY ALL HAVE THE SAME PROPERTIES AND STRENGTH,
 REGARDLESS OF MATERIAL AND BRAND?
  
 3. THIS PLAN HAS BEEN SENT FOR PEER REVIEW (FBPE). IF
 IT IS DETERMINED THAT ADDITIONAL FASTENERS ARE
 REQUIRED, OR THAT THE FASTENER SPECIFIED IS NOT
 APPROPRIATE OR ADEQUATE, CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO ADD
 OR CHANGE FASTENERS AT LOCATIONS DETERMINED BY THE PEER
 REVIEW ENGINEER. IF ANY OTHER DEFICIENCIES ARE FOUND IN
 PEER REVIEW, CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO CORRECT ANY NON
 COMPLIANT INSTALLATION. IT HAS BEEN SUGGESTED TO THE
 CONTRACTOR TO ADD THE THREE (OR MORE) FASTENERS WHICH
 ARE AT DISPUTE, COST OF WHICH SHOULD BE MINIMAL, AND
 TAKE GOOD PHOTOGRAPHS.
  
 4. AS THIS IS THE THIRD TIME THAT THE SAME DEFICIENCY
 WAS NOTED IN THE PLAN (BUT ENGINEER AND CONTRACTOR DO
 NOT AGREE PER MY DISCUSSION WITH CONTRACTOR), IF PEER
 REVIEW DETERMINES THAT THE SUBMITTALS WERE
 INSUFFICIENT, A 4X PLAN REVIEW FEE SHALL BE ASSESSED
 RETROACTIVELY AS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE
 553.80.2(B).
  
 THIS ISSUE WAS DISCUSSED WITH THE CONTRACTOR, WHO
 STATED THAT HE DREW THE FASTENER PATTERN WHICH WAS THEN
 SEALED BY THE ENGINEER, DISCUSSED, AND DETERMINED
 ADEQUATE BY BOTH THE CONTRACTOR AND THE ENGINEER.
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2016-06-29 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2016-06-29 Time 15:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2016-06-29 Time 15:10 Sent To  
Notes
2016-06-29 15:21:22****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 1. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED ANCHORS FOR
 THIS SIGN. "MIN" THREE PER LETTER ARE SPECIFIED, IT IS
 NOT CLEAR HOW THIS WILL BE ADEQUATE, FOR EXAMPLE, FOR
 THE LETTER "H". IS THE LOGO TO HAVE THE SAME FASTENING
 PATTERN AS LETTERS?
  
 2ND REVIEW, ENGINEER HAS ADDED A NOTE TO THE
 CALCULATIONS "USE MIN 3 ANCHORS PER LETTER, OR MORE
 WHERE NECESSARY (E.G. H, L, D, & HAWK LOGO)".
  
 IT APPEARS THAT CALCS FOR A RIGID SIGN WERE USED.
 DEPENDING ON LOCATION OF FASTENERS, IN PARTICULAR THE
 LARGER LETTERS, WOULDN'T A LOOSE END OF THE SIGN CREATE
 A MORE FLEXIBLE CONDITION? THE NOTE ADDRESSES FOUR
 ITEMS, BUT THE LETTERS K, D, AND G WERE NOT ADDRESSED.
 NO INFORMATION REGARDING FASTENER LOCATION WAS
 PROVIDED. WHO DECIDES WHEN IT IS "NECESSARY", AND HOW
 MANY "MORE" ARE REQUIRED? IT APPEARS THAT, IF
 ENGINEERING IS REQUIRED FOR SIGNS, THE ENGINEER SHOULD
 BE SPECIFYING THE FASTENING PATTERN AND NUMBER OF
 FASTENERS, NOT THE CONTRACTOR.
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2016-06-01 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2016-06-01 Time 08:43 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2016-06-01 Time 08:41 Sent To  
Notes
2016-06-01 09:12:27****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 1. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED ANCHORS FOR
 THIS SIGN. "MIN" THREE PER LETTER ARE SPECIFIED, IT IS
 NOT CLEAR HOW THIS WILL BE ADEQUATE, FOR EXAMPLE, FOR
 THE LETTER "H". IS THE LOGO TO HAVE THE SAME FASTENING
 PATTERN AS LETTERS?
  
 2. FBC 107, THE PLANS ARE TO INCLUDE THE PRINTED NAME
 AND SIGNATURE OF THE INDIVIDUAL TAKING RESPONSIBILITY
 FOR THE DESIGN. FINE PRINT ON THE PLAN EXCLUDES
 ELECTRICAL.
  
 3. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE CONTRACT FOR THIS JOB, FBC
 109.
  
  
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2016-07-13 Cont ID  
Sent By vperez Date 2016-07-13 Time 08:57 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vperez Date 2016-07-13 Time 08:57 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2016-06-23 Cont ID  
Sent By vperez Date 2016-06-23 Time 07:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vperez Date 2016-06-23 Time 07:44 Sent To B
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2016-05-31 Cont ID  
Sent By vperez Date 2016-05-31 Time 07:14 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vperez Date 2016-05-31 Time 07:14 Sent To B
Notes
2016-05-31 07:14:24INITIAL ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW
  
 APPLICABLE CODES IN EFFECT:
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2014 5TH EDITION
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ENERGY CONSERVATION 2014 5TH
 EDITION
 NFPA 70- 2011 NEC
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. PLEASE PROVIDE AND REFLECT ON ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS
 THE ELECTRICAL DATA INFORMATION, EXAMPLE VOLTAGE, TOTAL
 AMPS, CIRCUITS POWER SUPPLY INFORMATION ETC. FBC
 107.3.5- MINIMUM PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA
 2. ADD GENERAL NOTES TO INDICATE THAT ALL MATERIALS AND
 FASTENERS MEET 3004.4
 3. ALL ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS ARE UL LISTED AND APPROVED
 (GENERAL NOTE)
 4. SIGN TO BE GROUNDED ACCORDING TO NEC 600.7 (GENERAL
 NOTE)
 5. SIGN TO BE MANUFACTURED AND LISTED NEC 600.3 AND
 MARKED PER NEC 600.4(GENERAL NOTE)
 6. ALL BRANCH CIRCUITS PER NEC 600.5(B)1 AND B2(GENERAL
 NOTE)
 7. SIGN TO BE CONTROLLED BY PHOTOCELL OR TIME CLOCK PER
 FBC 2014 ENERGY CONSERVATION C405.2.4(GENERAL NOTE)
 8. VISIBLE 20AMP DISCONNECT PER SIGN PER CIRCUIT NEC
 600.6 A1 AND 2. (GENERAL NOTE)
 9. PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY
 QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS PROJECT.
  
 VALENTINO PEREZ
 ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER II
 561-805-6717
 [email protected]
  
  
  
  
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2016-07-14 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2016-07-14 Time 12:40 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2016-07-08 Time 09:54 Sent To  
Notes
2016-07-08 09:54:48RESUB ROUTED TO NJWIRA VIA ZONING INBOX
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2016-06-29 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2016-06-29 Time 15:21 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2016-06-21 Time 15:57 Sent To  
Notes
2016-06-21 15:57:20RESUB ROUTED TO NJWIRA VIA ZONING INBOX
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2016-06-01 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2016-06-01 Time 09:12 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2016-05-19 Time 14:55 Sent To  
Notes
2016-05-19 14:55:59ROUTED TO ZONING
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2016-07-12 Cont ID  
Sent By njwira Date 2016-07-12 Time 12:25 Rev Time 0.00
Received By njwira Date 2016-07-12 Time 12:25 Sent To E
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2016-06-22 Cont ID  
Sent By njwira Date 2016-06-22 Time 14:35 Rev Time 0.00
Received By njwira Date 2016-06-22 Time 14:35 Sent To E
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2016-05-26 Cont ID  
Sent By njwira Date 2016-05-26 Time 14:47 Rev Time 0.00
Received By njwira Date 2016-05-26 Time 14:47 Sent To E
Notes
***NONE***


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved