Plan Review Details - Permit 16040833
Plan Review Stops For Permit 16040833
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 7 Status P Date 2017-04-10 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-04-10 Time 07:39 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-04-10 Time 07:39 Sent To Z
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 6 Status F Date 2017-03-22 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-03-22 Time 15:52 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-03-22 Time 15:52 Sent To  
Notes
2017-03-22 15:59:54****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING 5TH EDITION (2014)
 SECTION 1609:
  
 1. CALCULATIONS ARE FOR 20% SOLID SURFACE. PLANS ARE
 FOR 75% OPEN; REVISE SO THE TWO ARE CONSISTENT. (DESIGN
 CRITERIA HAS CHANGED FROM 80% OPEN TO 75% OPEN SINCE
 PREVIOUS REVIEW, COMMENTS REVISED TO REFLECT THE NEW
 DESIGN CRITERIA).
  
 2. SEE PREVIOUS LIST REGARDING WIND DIRECTION: THE
 PROPOSED GATE IS NOT MEET THE 75% OPEN CRITERIA
 (REQUIREMENT BASED
 ON THE GATE FOUNDATION ABILITY TO WITHSTAND WIND LOADS)
 UNLESS THE WIND IS PARALLEL TO THE GATE. IF THE
 WIND IS PERPENDICULAR TO THE GATE, THE WIND EFFECT WILL
 BE SIMILAR TO THE EFFECT ON A SOLID SURFACE.
  
 THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE BUILDING
 OFFICIAL. IF THE ENGINEER OF RECORD DISAGREES, PLEASE
 HAVE
 HIM CALL ROBERT BROWN, 561-805-6652 OR EMAIL RATIONALE
 FOR THIS DESIGN MEETING HIS REQUIREMENT OF 75% OPEN
 TO [email protected] (AND PLEASE CC [email protected]).
  
 3. THE FOUNDATION DETAIL (PREPARED BY EVAN KENNEDY, PE,
 NO DATE, 8.5 X 11) IS NOT SIGNED AND SEALED IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH FS471 AND FAC61G15-23.002; ALSO THIS
 APPEARS TO BE THE FOUNDATION DETAIL FOR THE GATE ARM. I
 HAVE VOIDED THIS PAGE.
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 5 Status F Date 2017-03-08 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-03-08 Time 12:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-03-08 Time 12:42 Sent To  
Notes
2017-03-08 13:01:15****CORRECTIONS****
 COURTESY REVIEW BASED ON PHOTOGRAPHS SENT VIA EMAIL
 FROM CONTRACTOR
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING 5TH EDITION (2014)
 SECTION 1609:
  
 COMMENT FROM PREVIOUS BUILDING REVIEW #4 DATED
 3/6/2017:
  
 THE GATE DETAIL WAS PROVIDED. THE PLAN STATES THAT
 DESIGN CRITERIA IS FOR "80% OPEN SIGN". CALCULATIONS
 ARE FOR 20% SOLID SURFACE.
  
 THE GATE DETAIL GRAPHICALLY APPEARS TO DEPICT A SOLID
 GATE. A NOTE STATES THAT THE LOUVERS HAVE A .5"
 OVERLAP. IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW THE GATE MEETS THE
 CRITERIA OF 80% OPEN.
  
 REVISE PLAN TO CLARIFY GATE DESIGN (NEEDS TO BE 80%
 OPEN) OR GATE DESIGN CRITERIA (CURRENTLY APPEARS
 TO REQUIRE THAT THE GATE IS 80% OPEN, BUT PLAN SHOWS A
 SOLID GATE).
  
 COURTESY REVIEW 3/8/17; PHOTOGRAPHS OF PROPOSED GATE
 SENT VIA EMAIL BY CONTRACTOR:
  
 BASED ON THE PHOTOGRAPHS PROVIDED, THE PROPOSED GATE IS
 NOT MEET THE 80% OPEN CRITERIA (REQUIREMENT BASED
 ON THE GATE FOUNDATION ABILITY TO WITHSTAND WIND LOADS)
 UNLESS THE WIND IS PARALLEL TO THE GATE. IF THE
 WIND IS PERPENDICULAR TO THE GATE, THE WIND EFFECT WILL
 BE SIMILAR TO THE EFFECT ON A SOLID SURFACE.
  
 THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE BUILDING
 OFFICIAL. IF THE ENGINEER OF RECORD DISAGREES, PLEASE
 HAVE
 HIM CALL ROBERT BROWN, 561-805-6652 OR EMAIL RATIONALE
 FOR THIS DESIGN MEETING HIS REQUIREMENT OF 80% OPEN
 TO [email protected] (AND PLEASE CC [email protected]).
  
 THE ENGINEERED DETAIL IS NOT CLEAR AS TO CONSTRUCTION,
 FBC 107. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL IS ALSO IN AGREEMENT
 THAT A SECTION IS REQUIRED TO SHOW THE ANGLE OF THE
 GATE LOUVERS; THE DRAWINGS PROVIDED DO NOT ACCURATELY
 DEPICT PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION. THE SECTION SHOULD
 PROVIDE ENOUGH DIMENSIONS TO CLEARLY DEPICT PROPOSED
 CONSTRUCTION.
  
 PLEASE ALSO REVISE REFERENCE TO "SIGN" DESIGN CRITERIA
 (APPEARS THAT THIS SHOULD REFERENCE "GATE") OR CLARIFY
  
 TO CLARIFY THE SEQUENCE OF SUBMITTALS AND PLAN REVIEWS:
  
 1/9/2017 REVIEW, A GATE DETAIL PREPARED BY SIVANANTHAN
 SRITHARAN, PE ON 2/09/2016 INCLUDES A DETAIL (2-S2)
 WHICH
 CLARIFIES THE PROPOSED DESIGN BUT LACKS INFORMATION
 REGARDING THE PERCENTAGE OF OPEN AREA.
 2/10/2017 REVIEW, THIS GATE DETAIL WAS VOIDED BY
 APPLICANT AND A REPLACEMENT DETAIL NOT PROVIDED.
 3/6/2017 REVIEW, A NEW DETAIL PREPARED BY EVAN KENNEDY,
 PE ON 1/27/2017 WAS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW.
  
  
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2017-03-06 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-03-06 Time 12:01 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-03-06 Time 11:49 Sent To  
Notes
2017-03-06 12:09:21****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014)
 FBC B = FBC BUILDING
 FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING
 FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY
 FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION
  
 THE GATE DETAIL WAS PROVIDED. THE PLAN STATES THAT
 DESIGN CRITERIA IS FOR "80% OPEN SIGN". CALCULATIONS
 ARE FOR 20% SOLID SURFACE.
  
 THE GATE DETAIL GRAPHICALLY APPEARS TO DEPICT A SOLID
 GATE. A NOTE STATES THAT THE LOUVERS HAVE A .5"
 OVERLAP. IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW THE GATE MEETS THE
 CRITERIA OF 80% OPEN.
  
 REVISE PLAN TO CLARIFY GATE DESIGN (NEEDS TO BE 80%
 OPEN) OR GATE DESIGN CRITERIA (CURRENTLY APPEARS TO
 REQUIRE THAT THE GATE IS 80% OPEN, BUT PLAN SHOWS A
 SOLID GATE).
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2017-02-10 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-02-10 Time 09:45 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-02-10 Time 09:25 Sent To  
Notes
2017-02-10 09:47:21****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014)
 FBC B = FBC BUILDING
 FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING
 FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY
 FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION
  
 SEE PREVIOUS LIST FOR COMMENTS TO BE ADDRESSED.
  
 THE RESUBMITTAL DOES NOT INCLUDE GATE ENGINEERING. ONE
 OLD SET OF PLANS WAS PROVIDED, AND THE GATE DETAIL IS
 MARKED "VOID".
  
 FBC 107, PROVIDE GATE ENGINEERING SO THE REVIEW CAN BE
 COMPLETE. NOTE THAT THE FIRST COMMENT LIST STATES THAT
 25% SOLID WAS A LIMITATION, BUT NEW PLAN SPECS 80% OPEN
 (SO ONLY 20% SOLID ALLOWED). THE NEW DETAIL IS TO SHOW
 COMPLIANCE.
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2017-01-09 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-01-09 Time 11:30 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-01-09 Time 10:10 Sent To  
Notes
2017-01-09 10:15:31****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014)
 FBC B = FBC BUILDING
 FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING
 FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY
 FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION
  
 1. FBC 107, WHEN RESUBMITTING APPLICANT IS TO PREPARE
 TWO IDENTICAL COLLATED SETS OF PERMIT DOCUMENTS FOR
 PERMIT ISSUANCE.
  
 OLD SHEETS ARE TO BE RETAINED IN THE SUBMITTAL, REMOVED
 FROM THE TWO PERMIT ISSUE SETS, AND THOSE DOCUMENTS
 SHOULD BE MARKED "VOID" OR "OLD SHEETS".
  
 THE TWO COLLATED PERMIT SETS ARE TO INCLUDE ANY
 DOCUMENTS PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED AS WELL AS
 THE NEW DOCUMENTS WHICH SHOULD ADDRESS ALL COMMENTS.
  
 A RESPONSE LETTER STATING HOW EACH ITEM WAS ADDRESSED
 WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PLAN REVIEW.
  
 2. AS NO SHEETS WERE VOIDED, IT IS NOT CLEAR WHAT IS
 PROPOSED.
  
 SWING GATE OPERATOR FOUNDATION IS DESIGNED TO 156 MPH,
 BUT LIMITS TO 25% MAX SOLID AREA. THE PLAN APPEARS TO
 PROPOSE A SOLID AREA GATE; CLARIFY.
  
 THE ENGINEER OF RECORD IS TO REVIEW ALL ITEMS DESIGNED
 BY OTHERS, FBC 107.
  
 GATE OPENER FOUNDATION ENGINEERING IS A PHOTOCOPY;
 PROVIDE ORIGINALS FS 471.
  
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2016-05-04 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2016-05-04 Time 16:09 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2016-05-04 Time 16:09 Sent To FIRE
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2017-02-28 Cont ID  
Sent By vperez Date 2017-02-28 Time 08:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vperez Date 2017-02-28 Time 08:55 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2017-02-08 Cont ID  
Sent By vperez Date 2017-02-08 Time 11:51 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vperez Date 2017-02-08 Time 11:51 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2017-01-05 Cont ID  
Sent By mvaldes Date 2017-01-05 Time 16:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mvaldes Date 2017-01-05 Time 16:31 Sent To B
Notes
2017-01-05 16:58:342ND REVIEW 2014 5TH FBC ED. NEC 2011
 MARIO VALDES
 ELECTRICAL PLAN EXAMINER
 561-805-6713
 [email protected]
  
  
 1] IN ADDITION TO THE MANUFACTURE SPECS PROVIDE AN
 ELECTRICAL DETAIL SHOWING CONDUIT & WIRE SIZE, CIRCUIT
 # & AMPERAGE OF THE BRANCH CIRCUIT FEEDING THE GATE
 SWING MOTORS. FBC 107 (2ND REQUEST).
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2016-05-05 Cont ID  
Sent By mvaldes Date 2016-05-05 Time 18:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mvaldes Date 2016-05-05 Time 18:17 Sent To  
Notes
2016-05-05 18:21:24REVIEW 2014 5TH FBC ED. NEC 2011
 MARIO VALDES
 ELECTRICAL PLAN EXAMINER
 516-805-6713
 [email protected]
  
  
 - PROVIDE AN ELECTRICAL DIAGRAM SHOWING ROUTING OF
 RACEWAY FOR GATE MOTOR AND THE LOCATION OF THE
 EQUIPMENT.FURTHERMORE GIVE ME A PANEL SCHEDULE TELLING
 ME THE WIRE AND BREAKER SIZE FOR THIS CIRCUIT. WPBA 107
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2017-03-01 Cont ID  
Sent By wjolin Date 2017-03-01 Time 15:12 Rev Time 0.00
Received By wjolin Date 2017-03-01 Time 15:06 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2017-02-03 Cont ID  
Sent By wjolin Date 2017-02-03 Time 16:47 Rev Time 0.00
Received By wjolin Date 2017-02-03 Time 16:35 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2017-01-05 Cont ID  
Sent By wjolin Date 2017-01-05 Time 13:00 Rev Time 0.00
Received By wjolin Date 2017-01-05 Time 12:59 Sent To E
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2016-05-05 Cont ID  
Sent By wjolin Date 2016-05-05 Time 13:49 Rev Time 0.00
Received By wjolin Date 2016-05-05 Time 13:47 Sent To E
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 6 Status N Date 2017-04-11 Cont ID  
Sent By cpuell Date 2017-04-11 Time 16:56 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cpuell Date 2017-04-06 Time 13:51 Sent To  
Notes
2017-04-10 07:39:474/10 TO ZONING BOX
  
  
2017-04-07 13:51:25RESUB ROUTED TO SHILL
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 5 Status N Date 2017-03-22 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-03-22 Time 16:00 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-03-22 Time 15:51 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2017-03-07 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2017-03-07 Time 15:35 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date 2017-02-21 Time 13:18 Sent To  
Notes
2017-02-22 13:18:34B22
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2017-02-10 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-02-10 Time 09:50 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-01-27 Time 15:58 Sent To  
Notes
2017-01-27 15:58:38B22
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2017-01-09 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-01-09 Time 11:30 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2016-12-16 Time 10:16 Sent To  
Notes
2016-12-19 10:17:16RESUB ROUTED TO ESCHNEIDER VIA ZONING INBOX
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2016-05-13 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2016-05-13 Time 09:59 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date 2016-04-18 Time 12:35 Sent To  
Notes
2016-05-04 16:10:165/4 TO FIRE BOX
  
  
2016-04-19 12:35:41ROUTED TO ZONING
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 5 Status P Date 2017-04-10 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2017-04-10 Time 17:00 Rev Time 0.25
Received By eschneid Date 2017-04-10 Time 17:00 Sent To PC
Notes
2017-04-10 11:53:35ROUTED TO ERIC SCHNEIDER
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2017-03-07 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2017-03-07 Time 15:35 Rev Time 0.25
Received By eschneid Date 2017-03-07 Time 15:29 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2017-02-07 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2017-02-07 Time 15:22 Rev Time 0.50
Received By eschneid Date 2017-02-07 Time 14:22 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2016-12-30 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2016-12-30 Time 10:40 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date 2016-12-30 Time 16:04 Sent To FIRE
Notes
2016-12-30 12:21:21FAILED
  
 PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES.
  
 1) THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN DOES NOT ACCURATELY DEPICT
 THE EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS. THE LIGHT POLE SHOWN ON
 THE GATE PLAN IS NOT SHOWN IN THE CORRECT LOCATION. THE
 LIGHT POLE, AS CONSTRUCTED, BLOCKS THE SWING OF THE
 PROPOSED GATE.
  
 2) THE SITE PLAN SHALL SHOW THE SETBACK DIMENSIONS FOR
 THE GATE SUPPORT POSTS AND THE MOTOR PADS FROM THE EDGE
 OF THE SIDEWALK PAVEMENT TO ENSURE THAT THE GATE IS
 INSTALLED IN THE CORRECT LOCATION SO IT DOES NOT
 ENCROACH INTO THE TRUCK TRAVEL PATH.
  
 3) THE AUTOTURN EXHIBIT CLEARLY SHOWS THAT THE SWING OF
 THE TRUCK TRAILER WOULD HIT THE OPEN GATE ARM.
  
 4) THE AUTOTURN EXHIBIT NEEDS TO BE REDONE TO SHOW A
 SMOOTH TRANSITION OF THE TURNS. THE AUTOTURN AS
 PRESENTED SHOWS UNNATURAL "JUMPS" IN THE TURNS. STAFF
 IS CONCERNED THAT THESE ARTIFICIAL TURNS HAVE BEEN USED
 TO ATTEMPT TO SHOW THE TRUCK AVOIDING THE GATE.
  
 5) AN AUTOTURN EXHIBIT SHALL ALSO BE SHOWN TO VERIFY
 THAT THE TRUCKS CAN LEAVE THE SITE WITHOUT HITTING THE
 GATES AFTER THE FINAL RECONFIGURATION OF THE FLORIDA
 AVENUE MEDIANS.
  
 6) PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE MOTOR PADS ON THE SITE
 PLAN.
  
 7) THE MOTOR MUST BE SCREENED FROM VIEW OF THE FLORIDA
 AVENUE RIGHT-OF-WAY. PROVIDE DETAILS ON HOW THIS WILL
 OCCUR.
  
 8) PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE GATE SWING ARMS ON THE
 SITE PLAN.
  
 9) THE DOUBLE LEAF GATE PLAN ON SHEET S-1 HAS A NOTE
 REFERENCING SECURITY LATCHES AND SHOWS WHAT APPEAR TO
 BE BOLLARDS. WHAT ARE THESE BOLLARDS AND WHERE ARE THEY
 ON THE SITE PLAN?
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446.
2016-12-20 11:09:1312/20/16
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2016-05-13 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2016-05-13 Time 09:42 Rev Time 0.50
Received By eschneid Date 2016-05-13 Time 09:42 Sent To  
Notes
2016-05-13 09:59:00FAILED
  
 1) THE APPROVED PLANS FOR THE LOADING AREA ARE FOR GATE
 ARMS NOT SWING GATES. THE USE OF SWING GATES MAKES THE
 EASTERNMOST LOADING SPACE NON-FUNCTIONING AS THE SWING
 ARM WILL BLOCK SPACE WHEN THE GATE OPENS. LARGE TRUCKS
 PARKED IN THE MIDDLE LOADING SPACE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO
 EXIT THE LOADING AREA WITH THE SWING GATES OPEN DUE TO
 THEIR LARGE TURNING RADII.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446.


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved