 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 16020194
| Plan Review Stops For Permit 16020194 |
| Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-09-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-09-09 |
Time |
09:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-09-09 |
Time |
09:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-09-09 09:31:44 | OLD ADDRESS IN COMMUNITY PLUS FOR VIBROFLOTATION PERMIT | | | WAS 410 DATURA | | | NEW PRIMARY ADDRESS IS 499 EVERNIA STREET, PENDING | | | REPLAT AND NEW PARCEL ID | | | OTHER ADDRESSES ASSIGNED, WILL BE ENTERED INTO | | | COMMUNITY PLUS AFTER | | | UNIT NUMBERS PROVIDED BY OWNER (MR. ANDERSON) AND | | | APPROVED, PENDING REPLAT AND PARCEL ID | | | | | | PER MIKE ORIO, [email protected] | | | 561-494-1080 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-07-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-07-01 |
Time |
13:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-07-01 |
Time |
13:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-07-01 13:39:43 | IN ADDRESSING WITH MIKE ORIO | | | FINAL ADDRESSES WILL BE ASSIGNED PRIOR TO PERMIT | | | ISSUANCE (OR PRIOR TO C.O.) | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-03-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-03-18 |
Time |
08:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-03-18 |
Time |
08:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-03-18 08:36:05 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | 1. THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN FORWARDED TO OUR ADDRESSING | | | DEPARTMENT. ADDRESSING WILL BE COMPLETE PRIOR TO PERMIT | | | ISSUANCE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FROM DESIGNER OR OWNER | | | MAY BE REQUIRED. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2016-03-16 14:11:22 | ADDRESSING WILL BE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE, NOT A PART OF THE | | | FIRST REVIEW. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-10-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-10-21 |
Time |
13:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-10-21 |
Time |
13:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-10-21 14:01:26 | ****PROVISO**** | | | ****ISSUED AT CONTRACTOR'S RISK**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | 1. AS THE POOL COURTYARD OCCUPANT LOAD IS NOW OVER 500 | | | (WAS 395 IN PREVIOUS REVIEW), THREE MEANS OF EGRESS ARE | | | REQUIRED, FBC 1004.5, 1021.2.4. | | | | | | ALSO SEE FBC 1005.5 REGARDING LOSS OF AN EXIT. | | | | | | THE RESPONSE LETTER AND EGRESS CAPACITY TABULATIONS | | | CALCULATE GATE 161 AS A DOUBLE 4 FT, BUT THE PLANS | | | (A2.1, LS 0.1, OTHER SHEETS) DEPICT A SINGLE GATE. | | | | | | A SINGLE GATE IS SHOWN ADJACENT TO THE DOUBLE GATE 160. | | | AS THIS MEANS OF EGRESS IS REQUIRED, REVISE THE EGRESS | | | CAPACITY CALCULATIONS TO INCLUDE THIS GATE. | | | | | | PER ARCHITECT, THE POOL COURTYARD OCCUPANT LOAD WAS | | | OVERSTATED DUE TO AREAS OF LARGE PLANTERS / | | | LANDSCAPING. A REVISION SHOWING AN OCCUPANT LOAD UNDER | | | 500 OR THREE MEANS OF EGRESS IS REQUIRED. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-09-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-09-09 |
Time |
15:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-09-09 |
Time |
08:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-09-09 15:42:27 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | 1. AS THE POOL COURTYARD OCCUPANT LOAD IS NOW OVER 500 | | | (WAS 395 IN PREVIOUS REVIEW), THREE MEANS OF EGRESS ARE | | | REQUIRED, FBC 1004.5, 1021.2.4. | | | | | | ALSO SEE FBC 1005.5 REGARDING LOSS OF AN EXIT. | | | | | | THE RESPONSE LETTER AND EGRESS CAPACITY TABULATIONS | | | CALCULATE GATE 161 AS A DOUBLE 4 FT, BUT THE PLANS | | | (A2.1, LS 0.1, OTHER SHEETS) DEPICT A SINGLE GATE. | | | | | | A SINGLE GATE IS SHOWN ADJACENT TO THE DOUBLE GATE 160. | | | AS THIS MEANS OF EGRESS IS REQUIRED, REVISE THE EGRESS | | | CAPACITY CALCULATIONS TO INCLUDE THIS GATE. | | | | | | 2. THIS REVIEW CAN BE PASSED WITH PROVISO THAT AFFECTED | | | SHEETS ARE REVISED PRIOR TO BUILDING DRY IN. ARCHITECT | | | IS TO REQUEST PROVISO VIA EMAIL WITH AN EXPLANATION OF | | | POOL DECK MEANS OF EGRESS FUTURE REVISION. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-07-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-07-01 |
Time |
13:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-07-01 |
Time |
13:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-07-01 13:37:02 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | GOVERNING CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (FBC 2014) | | | | | | 1-6. OK; ALSO SEE THRESHOLD AND IMPACT FEE REVIEWS. | | | | | | 7. TWO DOCUMENTS WERE UPLOADED AS LAND AND TITLE SURVEY | | | (003-01 AND 004-02) BUT BOTH DOCUMENTS ARE ONE PAGE, | | | FIRST PAGE OF A TWO PAGE SURVEY. PROVIDE THE SECOND | | | PAGE, FBC 107. | | | | | | 8-10. OK | | | | | | 11. LS0.1, A SURFACE MOUNT FIRE EXTINGUISHER IS | | | DEPICTED ON THE RAMP (S2 TO BUSINESS/RESIDENTIAL) BUT | | | DOES NOT APPEAR ON SHEET A2.1; THIS DOES NOT APPEAR TO | | | COMPLY WITH FBC 1003.3, 1012.8, FBC 5TH ED. | | | ACCESSIBILITY 405.5. | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW, RESPONSE STATES THAT THIS WAS RELOCATED BUT | | | A SFE IS NOW SHOWN ON THE LANDING OF THE RAMP ON LS0.1, | | | BUT IS NOT ON SHEET A2.1 (AND RESPONSE LETTER APPEARS | | | TO IMPLY THAT INTENT WAS TO REMOVE IT FROM THE RAMP); | | | SAME COMMENTS APPLY. EITHER REMOVE OR CORRELATE WITH | | | A2.1 AND PROVIDE DIMENSIONS TO CLARIFY COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | 12-16. OK | | | | | | 17. LS 0.1, IT APPEARS THAT INTERMEDIATE HANDRAILS ARE | | | REQUIRED AT THE STAIR AT DOOR 115, FBC 1012.9. REVISE | | | THIS SHEET AND PROVIDE A DIMENSIONED DETAIL FOR THE | | | STAIR, FBC 107. | | | | | | RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT THIS WAS ADDED, BUT LS0.1 | | | AND A2.1 DO NOT APPEAR TO BE REVISED AT THIS LOCATION, | | | PLEASE CORRELATE. | | | | | | 18-20. OK | | | | | | 21. LS 0.1, REVISE PLAN TO CLARIFY THE NUMBER OF | | | OCCUPANTS EXITING THROUGH GATE 160. EXIT STAIR 4, EXIT | | | STAIR 6, POOL AREA, CLUBHOUSE, 1ST FLOOR RESIDENTIAL | | | LEAD TO THIS EXIT. | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW, OCCUPANCY CALCS AND RESPONSE LETTER SHOW AN | | | OCCUPANT LOAD OF 395. PLEASE REVISE; PLAN SHOWS AT | | | LEAST 468 (POOL DECK 375, POOL 50, GRILL AREA 20, A3 | | | COVERED 23) OR CLARIFY. ALSO INCLUDE THE AREA WHICH IS | | | NOT DESIGNATED ON THE LIFE SAFETY PLAN BUT IS SHOWN ON | | | A2.1 AS OUTDOOR LIVING. | | | LS0.1 EGRESS CAPACITY TABULATIONS INDICATE THAT THERE | | | IS A 38IN EXIT IN ADDITION TO TWO 68IN EXITS. I WAS | | | UNABLE TO LOCATE THE 38IN EXIT FOR THIS AREA, PLEASE | | | CLARIFY OR REVISE. NOTE THAT EXITING APPEARS COMPLIANT | | | WITHOUT THE THIRD EXIT. | | | | | | 22-25. OK | | | | | | 26. LS 0.2 AND OTHER SHEETS, A SURFACE MOUNT FIRE | | | EXTINGUISHER IS SHOWN WHERE IT APPEARS TO OBSTRUCT THE | | | ACCESSIBLE PARKING ACCESS AISLE. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS TO | | | SHOW THAT THE ACCESS AISLE IS NOT OBSTRUCTED. | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW, RESPONSE LETTER STATES THIS WAS MOVED BUT | | | THIS STILL APPEARS ON LS0.2, PLEASE CHECK ALL FLOORS | | | AND REVISE. | | | | | | 27. LS 0.2, LS 0.4, UNITS A1 AND C2, TENANT / OCCUPANCY | | | SEPARATION BETWEEN THE R2 UNITS AND THE A2 CORRIDOR IS | | | LACKING, FBC TABLE 508.4. | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW, RESPONSE LETTER STATES THIS WAS PROVIDED | | | BUT PLAN WAS NOT REVISED. PLEASE SEE WALL BETWEEN S2 | | | AND R2 ADJACENT TO STAIR 2. | | | | | | 28. LS 0.4, THE DOORS SERVING THE NORTH ROOF DECK ARE | | | TO SWING IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS TRAVEL, FBC | | | 1008.1.10. | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW, PLEASE ALSO CLARIFY COMPLIANCE WITH FBC | | | 1015.2.1. 11FT IS SHOWN BETWEEN THE TWO EXITS, BUT IT | | | APPEARS THAT THE DIAGONAL IS GREATER THAN 33. | | | | | | 29-30. OK | | | | | | 31. SHEET S1 2A, SPECIFY FLOOR LOADS FOR THE ASSEMBLY | | | AREAS (CLUBHOUSE ROOF DECK, GYM, EXERCISE ROOM). | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW, RESPONSE LETTER REFERS TO LS SHEETS BUT I | | | WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE THIS REVISION. PLEASE ALSO | | | INCORPORATE INTO THE APPLICABLE STRUCTURAL SHEET. | | | | | | 33-36. OK | | | | | | 36. S6.0, WALL PRESSURES SPECIFIED AND SOME PRODUCT | | | APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED BUT THE CHART IS A GENERAL | | | ONE, NOT SPECIFIC TO EACH OPENING. THE PRODUCT | | | APPROVALS ARE NOT MARKED TO INDICATE WHICH OF THE | | | OPTIONS IS PROPOSED. EITHER PROVIDE A SCHEDULE TO SHOW | | | DESIGN PRESSURES FOR EACH OPENING AND PRODUCT APPROVALS | | | MARKED TO SHOW WHICH OPTION PROPOSED FOR EACH OPENING | | | (OR ONE TO BE USED FOR ALL OPENINGS TO COMPLY WITH | | | WORST CASE), OR THIS WILL BE A PROVISO ITEM (PROVIDE | | | FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO INSTALLATION). | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW, RESPONSE LETTER DIRECTED ME TO THE PAGE | | | WHERE FOUR PRODUCTS ARE REFERENCED. THE FOLLOWING | | | ISSUES ARE NOTED: | | | | | | THE FIXED WINDOW PRODUCT APPROVAL REFERENCED ON SHEET | | | A4.7 IS FOR SMALL MISSILE IMPACT; LMI REQUIRED BELOW | | | 30FT (LMI NOA NOT INCLUDED IN THE PRODUCTS REVIEWED, | | | BUT NOA UPLOADED, PLEASE CORRELATE). | | | | | | THE SERIES 9500 LMI FIXED WINDOW WAS UPLOADED, BUT IS | | | NOT INCLUDED IN THE PRODUCTS REVIEWED (SHEET A4.7). | | | | | | THE FRENCH DOOR NOA 150611.10 PROVIDED DOES NOT APPEAR | | | TO INCLUDE PANIC BAR HARDWARE OPTION, SO THIS PRODUCT | | | CANNOT BE USED IN THE MEANS OF EGRESS FOR ASSEMBLY | | | OCCUPANCY. THIS HAS BEEN INCLUDED IN THE PROVISO LIST | | | (SUBMIT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION). | | | | | | ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH | | | WORST CASE DESIGN PRESSURES. MOST OPTIONS COMPLY. | | | PROVISO; COMPONENT AND CLADDING TO COMPLY WITH WORST | | | CASE DESIGN PRESSURES OR SUBMIT A SCHEDULE OF | | | APPLICABLE OPENINGS AND PROPOSED INSTALLATION. | | | | | | 37. 2ND REVIEW, THE SOFFIT DETAIL LACKS A BOND BREAK | | | REQUIRED (TWO LAYERS VAPOR BARRIER); PLEASE REVISE | | | DETAIL ACCORDINGLY, FBC 1403.2, ASTM C926. | | | | | | 38-40. OK | | | | | | 41. SEE PLUMBING COMMENTS REGARDING FAIR HOUSING. ALL | | | COMMENTS ARE ALSO APPLICABLE FOR BUILDING REVIEW. | | | | | | 42. REGARDING ENERGY CALCS, IT APPEARS THAT THERE IS A | | | 47,771 SF DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE AREA ON THE ENERGY | | | CALCS (CONDITIONED AREA 312,869) AND THE A SHEETS. | | | NUMBER OF STORIES ON EC IS 5, NOT CONSISTENT WITH PLAN. | | | THE DIGITAL SIGNATURE IS FOR VIVIANA FRANYIE, BUT THE | | | PRINTED SEAL IS FOR ALEJANDRO FRANYIE (THIS APPLIES TO | | | SOME OF THE FMEP SHEETS AS WELL, PLEASE CORRECT, | | | FS471). | | | | | | 43-46. OK | | | | | | 47. SIGNED & SEALED SOILS REPORT WAS NOT UPLOADED BUT | | | AN ORIGINAL WAS SUBMITTED WITH THE (ISSUED) | | | VIBROFLOTATION PERMIT, SO NOT REQUIRED FOR THIS PERMIT. | | | | | | THE STRUCTURAL CALCS ARE NOT DIGITALLY SIGNED AND | | | SEALED; PLEASE ADDRESS. | | | | | | 48-49. OK | | | | | | 49. PROVISO; | | | | | | 50. ADVISORY ONLY; SOME (BUT NOT ALL) PRODUCT APPROVALS | | | HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED. APPLICANT MAY ELECT TO DEFER | | | PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTAL. THEY CAN BE SUBMITTED AFTER | | | PERMIT ISSUANCE, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, WITH NO | | | ADDITIONAL FEES. | | | | | | 51. SEE ROOF REVIEW COMMENTS: | | | | | | ROOF NOAS FOR JM TPO SUBMITTED; 14-0618.03, 13-0529.02 | | | | | | A. ROOF PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED BUT THE | | | ASSEMBLY PROPOSED WAS NOT SELECTED AND ENGINEERING FOR | | | ENHANCED FASTENING (WOOD DECK) WAS NOT PROVIDED. IF | | | THIS INFORMATION IS NOT PROVIDED PRIOR TO PERMIT | | | ISSUANCE, THE INFORMATION WILL BE REQUIRED AT TIME OF | | | ROOF SUB PERMIT SUBMITTAL. AN "N" WILL BE ENTERED FOR | | | THE ROOF PLAN REVIEW. | | | | | | ROOF ASSEMBLIES SELECTED TO COMPLY WITH THE (VULT) | | | PRESSURES SPECIFIED ON SHEET S6-1. | | | | | | B. SHEET S6-1, CLARIFY THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE "ROOF | | | MEMBRANE DESIGN PRESSSURE" VS. "GROSS UPLIFT DESIGN | | | PRESSURES." THE DESIGN PRESSURES TO BE UTILIZED FOR THE | | | TPO ROOF IS NOT CLEAR. | | | | | | C. SHEET S6-1, IT APPEARS THAT ROOF PRESSURES SPECIFIED | | | USE ZONE 2 PRESSURES FOR ZONE 3. THE STAIR ROOFS, | | | ELEVATOR ROOFS, CANOPIES (DETAIL 1-S4.1, A SHEETS | | | BUILDING SECTIONS, OTHER PLACES) DO NOT INCLUDE A 3FT | | | PARAPET, FBC 1609, ASCE7 10 30.6-1 NOTE 7. SEE ALSO | | | ROOF REVIEW COMMENTS. IT IS NOT CLEAR WHICH DESIGN | | | PRESSURES ARE SPECIFIED FOR THE ROOF. | | | | | | D. PLAN SHEET S1.9C AND OTHER SHEETS INCLUDE AN | | | INDICATOR FOR DETAIL 1 S9.1A; UNABLE TO LOCATE THIS | | | SHEET (S9.1A). PLEASE PROVIDE SHEET OR REVISE DETAIL | | | INDICATOR TO CORRECT LOCATION. | | | | | | 54-56. OK | | | | | | RESPONSE LETTER STOPS AT COMMENT #56. AS IT IS NOT | | | CLEAR WHICH OF THE ITEMS HAVE BEEN REVISED, OR WHERE, | | | COMMENTS REMAIN. | | | | | | 58. A2.1, THE DOOR FOR UNIT 140 AND OTHER UNITS ARE NOT | | | LABELED, FBC 107. THE INDEX SHOWS A DOOR SCHEDULE FOR | | | THE AMENITY AREA. PLEASE ADVISE AS TO WHERE THE UNIT | | | ENTRY DOOR SCHEDULE IS LOCATED OR PROVIDE. | | | | | | 59. FBC 424.1.3.1.9, 424.2.17, POOL BARRIER PROPOSED IS | | | NOT CLEAR (WINDOWS LOCATED IN THE WALL WHICH SERVES AS | | | THE POOL BARRIER). | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW; A NOTE WAS ADDED TO STATE THAT ALL UNIT | | | BALCONY RAILINGS ARE AT 48IN (LS0.1). PLEASE REVISE | | | PLAN TO SHOW INTENT FOR POOL BARRIER FOR THE FIRST | | | FLOOR WINDOWS WHICH DIRECTLY FACE THE POOL. | | | | | | 60. SHEET A6.1, ITEM 68 SPECIFIES RIGID INSULATION, NOA | | | 11-0516.02; THIS IS THE NOA NUMBER FOR WATERPROOFING, | | | REVISE; ALSO SEE OTHER COMMENTS REGARDING NOA NUMBERS | | | ON THE PLAN. | | | | | | 61. PROVIDE A GRAB BAR BACKING DETAIL, FBC 107. | | | | | | 62. FHA, NOT ALL OF THE SLIDING GLASS DOORS PROPOSED | | | ARE 6FT; FOR INSTANCE, SEE UNIT S2, SHEET A4.1. SEE | | | PAGE 3.10 OF THE FAIR HOUSING ACT DESIGN MANUAL AND THE | | | GUIDANCE REGARDING SLIDING GLASS PATIO DOORS (SECONDARY | | | DOOR) AND REVISE PLAN TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | 63. DETAIL 2-S4.1 GRAPHICALLY DEPICTS AN EMBEDDED STRAP | | | BUT DOES NOT SPECIFY. PLEASE EITHER PROVIDE INFORMATION | | | AS TO WHERE THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND OR REVISE | | | PLAN TO SPECIFY CONNECTORS. | | | | | | 64. DETAILS 1 AND 2, S4.1, PLEASE PROVIDE DIRECTION AS | | | TO WHICH PLAN VIEW SHEET THE DETAIL INDICATOR FOR THESE | | | DETAILS ARE LOCATED. | | | | | | 65. FIRST FLOOR (LS 0.1 AND OTHER SHEETS), ADJACENT TO | | | STAIR 3, A RAMP IS SHOWN BUT NO STAIR TO ACCESS THE | | | RESIDENTIAL CORRIDOR FROM THE GARAGE. IT IS SUGGESTED | | | THAT AN ACCESSIBLE STAIR BE ADDED. THE RAMP ADDS | | | DISTANCE TO THE PATH OF TRAVEL WHICH COULD BE A | | | HARDSHIP FOR SOMEONE WHO IS DISABLED OR COMPROMISED, | | | DOES NOT USE A WHEELCHAIR AND IS ABLE TO NAVIGATE A | | | STAIR. | | | | | | 66. OK | | | | | | NEW COMMENT: | | | | | | 67. WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE AN UPDATED INDEX | | | SPREADSHEET TO INDICATE WHICH SHEETS CHANGED IN THIS | | | AND NEXT REVIEWS. ALL SHEETS HAVE NOT BEEN REVIEWED AT | | | THIS TIME AS ALL SHEETS WERE REPLACED DUE TO DIGITAL | | | SIGNATURE, ONLY SHEETS WHICH WERE AFFECTED BY THIS | | | COMMENT LIST. IF PROVIDED WITH A LIST OF ALL SHEETS | | | WITH CHANGES FOR THIS SUBMITTAL, THIS WILL EXPEDITE THE | | | LAST REVIEW AS ALL SHEETS WILL BE CHECKED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE. | | | | | | THIS LIST MAY BE SENT TO ME VIA EMAIL PRIOR TO | | | RESUBMITTAL AND THE SHEETS WILL BE REVIEWED IN THIS | | | CYCLE. | | | | | | THIS PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH THE FOLLOWING PROVISOS: | | | | | | 1. PER FS 553.79, ALL SHORING/RE-SHORE ENGINEERING IS | | | TO BE REVIEWED BY ENGINEER OF RECORD AND THREE SIGNED | | | AND SEALED ORIGINAL SETS ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR PLAN | | | REVIEW. THE SHORING/RESHORE ENGINEERING IS TO BE | | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO INSPECTION. THE CITY | | | APPROVED (CITY STAMPED) SHORING/RE-SHORE ENGINEERING IS | | | TO BE AVAILABLE ON THE JOB AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION. | | | | | | 2. PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, A SHORING/RESHORE GUARD RAIL | | | DETAIL IS TO BE SUBMITTED FOR PLAN REVIEW. THIS SHOULD | | | BE SUBMITTED WITH THE SHORING/RESHORE ENGINEERING. | | | | | | 3. A REPLAT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO C.O. AS THE PROPOSED | | | CONSTRUCTION CROSSES PROPERTY LINE, FBC 705.8. PROVIDE | | | THE BOOK AND PAGE WHERE THIS HAS BEEN RECORDED WHEN | | | AVAILABLE. | | | | | | 4. PROVISO, ACCESSIBLE MEANS OF EGRESS, FBC 5TH EDITION | | | ACCESSIBILITY 207, NO METHOD SELECTED; COMPLIANCE WITH | | | BOTH REQUIRED OR, IF ANY FIELD ISSUES ARISE, A REVISION | | | IS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 5. PROVISO, A SEPARATE ROOF PERMIT IS REQUIRED. PRODUCT | | | APPROVALS REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF RECORD IS TO BE | | | SUBMITTED WITH A PERMIT APPLICATION. CONTRACTOR IS TO | | | INDICATE ASSEMBLY PROPOSED AND, IF APPLICABLE, PROVIDE | | | ENGINEERING. | | | | | | 6. PROVISO; COMPONENT AND CLADDING TO COMPLY WITH WORST | | | CASE DESIGN PRESSURES OR SUBMIT AS A REVISION; PROVIDE | | | A SCHEDULE OF APPLICABLE OPENINGS AND PROPOSED | | | INSTALLATION. | | | | | | 7. PROVISO; SEPARATE PERMITS (APPLICATION, PLANS, FEES, | | | REVIEW) REQUIRED FOR POOL. THE PLANS HAVE BEEN MARKED | | | ?VOID? AND HAVE NOT BEEN REVIEWED. | | | | | | 8. PROVISO; THE FOLLOWING PRODUCT APPROVALS OR SITE | | | SPECIFIC ENGINEERING ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED AS A | | | REVISION AND REVIEWED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION: | | | | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS: | | | MECHANICAL LOUVERS | | | WINDOWS (WITH EXCEPTION OF NOAS ALREADY SUBMITTED) | | | SERIES 8000 ALUMINUM WINDOW WALL SYSTEM (15-0727.05, | | | SHEET A5.5) | | | EXTERIOR DOORS | | | ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY EXTERIOR DOORS | | | GENSTORM OPTION #1 LOUVER OUTSWING STEEL DOOR, DOUBLE | | | (A5.4) | | | OHD | | | BAR TELS FRAMELESS DOORS (A5.4) | | | ALL OTHER COMPONENTS AND CLADDING NOT SUBMITTED AND | | | REVIEWED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE | | | | | | DELEGATED ENGINEERING: | | | GREEN SCREEN ALUMINUM FRAME SYSTEM | | | 2ND LEVEL METAL CANOPY | | | TRELLIS | | | SHADE STRUCTURES | | | RAILINGS | | | PRECAST CONCRETE (S7.0, DELEGATED ENGINEERING | | | CONNECTIONS) | | | PRECAST STAIRS AND LANDINGS | | | AWNINGS AND CANOPIES | | | OTHER DELEGATED ENGINEERING ITEMS | | | | | | 9. PROVISO, ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS TO BE PRINTED IN AN | | | EASILY LEGIBLE FORMAT (PLAN PAGES MINIMUM OF 8.5X11IN | | | FULL SHEET OR, PREFERABLY 11X17). | | | | | | 10. PROVISO, THE FOLLOWING TEST REPORTS FOR THE | | | FLOORING UNDERLAYMENT WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO | | | INSTALLATION (INFORMATIONAL NOTE: PER S2.4, S3.1 FLOOR | | | SLABS ARE 8IN, SO STC AND IIC TESTS ON AN 8IN SLAB OR | | | LESS ARE ACCEPTABLE): STC (FBC 1207.2), IIC (FBC | | | 1207.3), ASTM E 84 (FBC 603.1). | | | | | | 11. FS 553.79(7)(C) ALL SHORING AND RESHORING | | | PROCEDURES, PLANS, AND DETAILS BE SUBMITTED TO THE | | | ENFORCEMENT AGENCY FOR RECORDKEEPING. SHORING/RESHORE | | | ENGINEERING IS TO BE SUBMITTED AT EACH LIFT. FAILURE TO | | | SUBMIT SHORING/RESHORE PLANS TO THE BUILDING DIVISION | | | FOR PLAN REVIEW AT THE TIME OF EACH LIFT MAY RESULT IN | | | A STOP WORK ORDER. AS THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN PROBLEMATIC | | | IN THE PAST, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT A NOTE BE | | | INCORPORATED INTO THE PLAN. | | | | | | 12. PROVISO, ALL DOORS AND GATES IN THE MEANS OF EGRESS | | | FOR ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY SHALL HAVE PANIC DEVICES OR FIRE | | | EXIT HARDWARE, FBC 1008. A REVISION INCLUDING PRODUCT | | | APPROVALS WITH PANIC DEVICES PROPOSED IS TO BE | | | SUBMITTED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-03-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-03-10 |
Time |
16:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-03-01 |
Time |
16:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-03-10 16:43:50 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | REVISED 3/25/16 | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | GOVERNING CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (FBC 2014) | | | | | | 1. FLORIDA STATUTE 553.71, THIS BUILDING QUALIFIES AS A | | | THRESHOLD BUILDING; ANY BUILDING WHICH IS GREATER THAN | | | (3) STORIES OR 50 FT. IN HEIGHT, OR WHICH HAS AN | | | ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION AS DEFINED IN THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE WHICH EXCEEDS 5,000 SF IN AREA | | | AND AN OCCUPANT CONTENT OF GREATER THAN 500 PERSONS. | | | | | | 2. AS A THRESHOLD BUILDING, THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: | | | | | | A. THRESHOLD INSPECTION PLAN; FS 553.79(5)(A), 2010 | | | WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING | | | CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION 109.3.6.1. THE | | | ENFORCING AGENCY SHALL REQUIRE A SPECIAL INSPECTOR TO | | | PERFORM STRUCTURAL INSPECTIONS ON A THRESHOLD BUILDING | | | PURSUANT TO A STRUCTURAL INSPECTION PLAN PREPARED BY | | | THE ENGINEER OR ARCHITECT OF RECORD. THE STRUCTURAL | | | INSPECTION PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY | | | THE ENFORCING AGENCY BEFORE THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING | | | PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A THRESHOLD BUILDING. | | | THE PURPOSE OF THE STRUCTURAL INSPECTION PLAN IS TO | | | PROVIDE SPECIFIC INSPECTION PROCEDURES AND SCHEDULES SO | | | THAT THE BUILDING CAN BE ADEQUATELY INSPECTED FOR | | | COMPLIANCE WITH THE PERMITTED DOCUMENTS. | | | | | | B. THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: WPB AMENDMENT 109.3.6.2 W.P.B. | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT REQUESTS FOR THRESHOLD | | | BUILDINGS A SPECIAL INSPECTOR AS REQUIRED BY FS | | | 553.79(5)(A) TO THE MINIMUM INSPECTIONS REQUIRED BY | | | THIS CODE. THE THRESHOLD INSPECTION FORMS ARE REQUIRED | | | TO BE FILED OUT BY ALL PARTIES, NOTARIZED AND RETURNED | | | TO THIS OFFICE, REVIEWED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO PERMIT | | | ISSUANCE. CONTACT KEN CONRAD, MANAGER OF THE SPECIAL | | | INSPECTOR PROGRAM, AT 561-805-6666 FOR ADDITIONAL | | | INFORMATION. | | | FORMS WERE SENT TO: [email protected] ON 3/1/16. | | | | | | C. SPECIAL INSPECTOR RESUME': PROVIDE A RESUME' OF | | | INSPECTION EXPERIENCE ON PREVIOUS PROJECTS FOR REVIEW | | | BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OR HIS DESIGNEE. AFTER THE | | | RESUME' IS REVIEWED, AN INTERVIEW WILL BE SCHEDULED. | | | UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES WILL AN INSPECTOR BE INTERVIEWED | | | FOR WORK WITHOUT FIRST MEETING THE ABOVE CRITERIA. THE | | | RESUME' IS TO BE SUBMITTED TO KEN CONRAD (AND COPY | | | SAMANTHA HILL), 561-805-6666, [email protected], | | | [email protected] | | | | | | ALL PROSPECTIVE INSPECTORS ARE TO BE APPROVED BY THE | | | CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR AND ALL ARE REQUIRED TO SIGN | | | THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR AGREEMENT. | | | | | | D. CONTRACTOR RESUME': PROVIDE A JOB SUMMARY OR HISTORY | | | FOR THIS TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION. THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED TO | | | KEN CONRAD, (PLEASE COPY SAMANTHA HILL) VIA E-MAIL | | | ([email protected], [email protected]). | | | | | | 3. ADVISORY ONLY; PER FS 553.79, ALL SHORING/RE-SHORE | | | ENGINEERING IS TO BE REVIEWED BY ENGINEER OF RECORD AND | | | THREE SIGNED AND SEALED ORIGINAL SETS ARE TO BE | | | SUBMITTED FOR PLAN REVIEW. THE SHORING/RESHORE | | | ENGINEERING IS TO BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO | | | INSPECTION. THE CITY APPROVED (CITY STAMPED) | | | SHORING/RE-SHORE ENGINEERING IS TO BE AVAILABLE ON THE | | | JOB AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION. | | | | | | 4. ADVISORY ONLY; PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, A | | | SHORING/RESHORE GUARD RAIL DETAIL IS TO BE SUBMITTED | | | FOR PLAN REVIEW. THIS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED WITH THE | | | SHORING/RESHORE ENGINEERING. | | | | | | 5. PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT BY | | | PALM BEACH COUNTY IS REQUIRED. PLEASE CONTACT | | | 561-233-5025 FOR MORE INFORMATION. | | | | | | 6. THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION CROSSES PROPERTY LINE, FBC | | | 705.8. PLEASE ADVISE; HAS A REPLAT BEEN FILED? | | | | | | 7. TWO DOCUMENTS WERE UPLOADED AS LAND AND TITLE SURVEY | | | (003-01 AND 004-02) BUT BOTH DOCUMENTS ARE ONE PAGE, | | | FIRST PAGE OF A TWO PAGE SURVEY. PROVIDE THE SECOND | | | PAGE, FBC 107. | | | | | | 8. ADVISORY ONLY; DEMOLITION OF EACH BUILDING REQUIRES | | | A SEPARATE PERMIT. PLEASE SEE THE DEMOLITION PERMIT | | | APPLICATION CHECKLIST ON OUR WEBSITE: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DE | | | PARTMENTS/DEVELOPMENT-SERVICES/CONSTRUCTION/PERMITS | | | | | | 9. DOOR 101 TO RESIDENTIAL LOBBY 143, PLEASE REVISE | | | PLAN TO SHOW MANEUVERING CLEARANCE (18IN MINIMUM), PULL | | | SIDE, SEE ANSI 117.1 FIG.B4.13.5 (PER FAIR HOUSING | | | ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES, REQUIREMENT 3, USABLE DOORS). | | | | | | 10. STAIR 2, A2.1 AND LS 0.1, DOES NOT HAVE A DOOR, | | | WEST SIDE, SEE FBC 1022.3.1. | | | | | | 11. LS0.1, A SURFACE MOUNT FIRE EXTINGUISHER IS | | | DEPICTED ON THE RAMP (S2 TO BUSINESS/RESIDENTIAL) BUT | | | DOES NOT APPEAR ON SHEET A2.1; THIS DOES NOT APPEAR TO | | | COMPLY WITH FBC 1003.3, 1012.8, FBC 5TH ED. | | | ACCESSIBILITY 405.5. | | | | | | 12. FIRST FLOOR, IT IS NOT CLEAR WHICH PARKING SPACES | | | SERVE THE BUSINESS OCCUPANCY AND RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCY, | | | REVISE PLAN TO CLARIFY AND SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC 5TH | | | EDITION ACCESSIBILITY TABLE 208.2, FHA REQUIREMENT 2. | | | PROVIDE THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES (FOR | | | BUSINESS AND RESIDENTIAL), NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE SPACES | | | (FOR BUSINESS AND RESIDENTIAL), SHEET GA2.1. NOTE THAT | | | ALL OF THE VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE ON THE | | | PUBLIC SIDE OF THE VEHICLE BARRIER GATE ARM AS WELL AS | | | SEVERAL ACCESSIBLE SPACES. MORE INFORMATION REGARDING | | | PARKING FOR RESIDENTS AND BUSINESS VISITORS IS NEEDED. | | | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME TO DISCUSS. | | | | | | 13. GA PAGES, FAIR HOUSING ACT REQUIREMENT 2, | | | ACCESSIBLE AND USABLE COMMON USE AREA, STATES THAT THE | | | BUILDING BE DESIGNED SO THAT THE PUBLIC AND COMMON USE | | | AREAS ARE READILY ACCESSIBLE TO AND USABLE BY | | | HANDICAPPED PERSONS. NONE OF THE ACCESSIBLE SPACES | | | INCLUDE A CHARGING STATION, AND NONE OF THE CHARGING | | | STATION SPACES INCLUDE AN ACCESS AISLE; PLEASE REVISE | | | TO COMPLY WITH THIS REQUIREMENT. | | | | | | 14. FBC 5TH EDITION ACCESSIBILITY 207, REVISE PLAN TO | | | STATE WHICH METHOD OF COMPLIANCE IS ELECTED FOR | | | ACCESSIBLE MEANS OF EGRESS (OFFICE SPACE). | | | | | | 15. LS0.1, NOTE UNDER PARKING GARAGE (MECHANICALLY | | | VENTILATED) STATES "AREA OF REFUGED #1", PLEASE | | | CLARIFY. | | | | | | 16. LS 0.1, REVISE PLAN TO INCLUDE GRILL AREA OCCUPANT | | | LOAD, FBC 1004. | | | | | | 17. LS 0.1, IT APPEARS THAT INTERMEDIATE HANDRAILS ARE | | | REQUIRED AT THE STAIR AT DOOR 115, FBC 1012.9. REVISE | | | THIS SHEET AND PROVIDE A DIMENSIONED DETAIL FOR THE | | | STAIR, FBC 107. | | | | | | 18. LS 0.1, THE HANDRAIL FOR THE RAMP IS SHOWN | | | GRAPHICALLY AS A PROTRUSION INTO THE PATH OF TRAVEL. | | | | | | 19. LS 0.1, THE CLUBHOUSE DOORS 170 AT THE VESTIBULE | | | ARE DOUBLE DOORS, BUT GATE 160 IS 3FT; FBC 1005.4. SEE | | | ALSO FBC 1008.2; GATES USED AS A COMPONENT IN A MEANS | | | OF EGRESS SHALL CONFORM TO THE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS | | | FOR DOORS. | | | | | | 20. LS 0.1, REVISE PLAN TO INCLUDE THE SIDEWALK WIDTH | | | FROM GATE 160 TO THE PUBLIC WAY, FBC 1005.4. | | | | | | 21. LS 0.1, REVISE PLAN TO CLARIFY THE NUMBER OF | | | OCCUPANTS EXITING THROUGH GATE 160. EXIT STAIR 4, EXIT | | | STAIR 6, POOL AREA, CLUBHOUSE, 1ST FLOOR RESIDENTIAL | | | LEAD TO THIS EXIT. | | | | | | 22. LS 0.1, EXIT STRATEGY FOR POOL DECK AMENITY AREA | | | AND CLUBHOUSE IS NOT CLEAR. EGRESS CAPACITY TABULATIONS | | | DOES NOT INCLUDE POOL DECK AREAS; REVISE TO INCLUDE. | | | | | | 23. LS 0.1, TOTAL OCCUPANTS IN THE POOL AREA IS 414 | | | (NOT INCLUDING THE GRILL AREA), WHICH REQUIRES 82.8IN | | | OF EGRESS WIDTH, 1005.3.2; 68IN PROVIDED. SEE ALSO FBC | | | 1005.5 (REGARDING LOSS OF ONE EXIT); IT APPEARS THAT | | | BOTH GATES (160, 161) ARE REQUIRED TO BE WIDER. | | | | | | 24. LS 0.1, WILL RESIDENTS HAVE ACCESS FROM THE STREET | | | SIDE OF GATE 160? THIS GATE LACKS THE MANEUVERING | | | CLEARANCE REQUIRED BY ANSI 117.1 (FHA), 18IN PULL SIDE, | | | ANSI 117.1 FIG.B4.13.5. | | | | | | 25. LS 0.1, IT IS NOT CLEAR IF GATE 160A HAS THE | | | MANEUVERING CLEARANCE REQUIRED BY ANSI 117.1 (FHA), | | | 18IN PULL SIDE, ANSI 117.1 FIG.B4.13.5. REVISE PLAN TO | | | CLARIFY. | | | | | | 26. LS 0.2 AND OTHER SHEETS, A SURFACE MOUNT FIRE | | | EXTINGUISHER IS SHOWN WHERE IT APPEARS TO OBSTRUCT THE | | | ACCESSIBLE PARKING ACCESS AISLE. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS TO | | | SHOW THAT THE ACCESS AISLE IS NOT OBSTRUCTED. | | | | | | 27. LS 0.2, LS 0.4, UNITS A1 AND C2, TENANT / OCCUPANCY | | | SEPARATION BETWEEN THE R2 UNITS AND THE A2 CORRIDOR IS | | | LACKING, FBC TABLE 508.4. | | | | | | 28. LS 0.4, THE DOORS SERVING THE NORTH ROOF DECK ARE | | | TO SWING IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS TRAVEL, FBC | | | 1008.1.10. | | | | | | 29. LS 0.4 IS LABELED LEVELS 4 THROUGH 7, BUT THE 4TH | | | FLOOR IS NOT THE SAME AS FLOORS 5 THROUGH 7, PLEASE | | | CORRELATE. | | | | | | 30. LS 0.5, UNIT C1 TO CORRIDOR LACKS THE 1 HOUR RATING | | | REQUIRED BY FBC 1018, PLEASE REVISE. | | | | | | 31. SHEET S1 2A, SPECIFY FLOOR LOADS FOR THE ASSEMBLY | | | AREAS (CLUBHOUSE ROOF DECK, GYM, EXERCISE ROOM). | | | | | | 33. SHEET A2.9 SPECS MIAMI DADE NOAS 14-0618.03, | | | 13-0529.02 (JM TPO) ROOF SYSTEM. ADVISORY ONLY; A | | | SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO A ROOFING PRODUCT WILL REQUIRE A | | | REVISION IF A DIFFERENT PRODUCT IS SELECTED AT TIME OF | | | INSTALLATION. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT, IF UNSURE OF | | | FINAL PRODUCT TO BE INSTALLED, REFERENCES ARE LEFT OFF | | | OF THE PLAN AND PRODUCT APPROVALS (REVIEWED BY DESIGNER | | | OF RECORD) SUBMITTED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. THIS | | | COMMENT DOES NOT NEED TO BE ADDRESSED SUBJECT TO | | | DESIGNER?S DISCRETION. | | | | | | 34. ROOF PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED BUT THE | | | ASSEMBLY PROPOSED WAS NOT SELECTED AND ENGINEERING FOR | | | ENHANCED FASTENING WAS NOT PROVIDED. IF THIS | | | INFORMATION IS NOT PROVIDED AT THIS TIME, THE | | | INFORMATION WILL BE REQUIRED AT TIME OF ROOF SUB PERMIT | | | SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 35. DETAIL 9-A2.9 SPECIFIES PLYWOOD SHEATHING; 1-S4.1 | | | SPECS WOOD FRAMED CANOPY (ALSO OTHER DETAILS THROUGH | | | PLANS). PLEASE SEE FBC 603 AND REVISE. | | | | | | 36. S6.0, WALL PRESSURES SPECIFIED AND SOME PRODUCT | | | APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED BUT THE CHART IS A GENERAL | | | ONE, NOT SPECIFIC TO EACH OPENING. THE PRODUCT | | | APPROVALS ARE NOT MARKED TO INDICATE WHICH OF THE | | | OPTIONS IS PROPOSED. EITHER PROVIDE A SCHEDULE TO SHOW | | | DESIGN PRESSURES FOR EACH OPENING AND PRODUCT APPROVALS | | | MARKED TO SHOW WHICH OPTION PROPOSED FOR EACH OPENING | | | (OR ONE TO BE USED FOR ALL OPENINGS TO COMPLY WITH | | | WORST CASE), OR THIS WILL BE A PROVISO ITEM (PROVIDE | | | FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO INSTALLATION). | | | | | | 37. DETAIL 1-S4.1, PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE SOFFIT (OR | | | ADVISE AS TO WHERE THIS INFORMATION IS LOCATED). PLAN | | | STATES ?STUCCO & OTHER FINISHES, REF. ARCHITECTURAL.? | | | | | | 38. SHEET S1.9A IS INCORRECTLY NAMED AS 8TH FLOOR | | | PARTIAL PLAN (BUT IS A PARTIAL ROOF PLAN), PLEASE | | | ADDRESS. | | | | | | 39. SHEET S6.1 STATES THAT PARAPET PRESSURES ARE BASED | | | ON A SOLID PARAPET WITH NO INTERNAL PRESSURE AND THAT | | | INTERNAL PRESSURE MAY NEED TO BE ADDED. THE PARAPETS | | | SHOWN ON S4.1 ARE WOOD FRAME. IT APPEARS THAT SOME OF | | | THE PARAPETS ARE NOT SOLID. PLEASE INCLUDE PARAPET | | | DESIGN PRESSURES FOR FRAME PARAPETS. | | | | | | 40. DETAIL 6-4.0, 1-S7.0 SPECIFIES A LINTEL, BUT I WAS | | | UNABLE TO LOCATE A LINTEL SCHEDULE, FBC 16, FBC 107, | | | PLEASE DIRECT OR REVISE TO INCLUDE LINTEL | | | SPECIFICATION. | | | | | | 41. SEE PLUMBING COMMENTS REGARDING FAIR HOUSING. ALL | | | COMMENTS ARE ALSO APPLICABLE FOR BUILDING REVIEW. | | | | | | 42. SEE MECHANICAL COMMENTS REGARDING ENERGY CALCS. ALL | | | COMMENTS ARE ALSO APPLICABLE FOR BUILDING REVIEW. | | | | | | 43. SHEET LS 0.1 STATES THAT STAIRS ARE PRESSURIZED BUT | | | I WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE STAIR PRESSURIZATION DETAILS, | | | PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | | | | 44. A5.3.1, ITEM 22, WOOD COMPOSITE PANELS ON METAL | | | CHANNELS, PLEASE ADVISE; IS THIS APPLICABLE FOR THIS | | | JOB, AND WHERE? FBC 603. | | | | | | 45. A5.4, SEE FBC TABLE 716.5, DOORS 106, 106A ARE | | | REQUIRED TO HAVE A 1.5 HR RATING AS THEY ARE LOCATED IN | | | A 2 HOUR WALL, 45 MINUTES SPECIFIED. DOOR 110 ON THE | | | PLAN IS DEPICTED IN A 1 HOUR WALL, BUT THE DOOR | | | SCHEDULE DOES NOT SPECIFY A FIRE RATING. CHECK ALL AND | | | REVISE AS NECESSARY PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 46. FBC 501.2, ADDRESS IDENTIFICATION REQUIRED. | | | | | | 47. THE SOILS REPORT IS NOT DIGITALLY SIGNED. THE | | | REPORT ALSO LACKS THE ENGINEERING COMPANY CERTIFICATE | | | OF AUTHORIZATION ON THE DOCUMENT. PLEASE REVISE TO | | | INCLUDE. IF THE ENGINEER (RAMAKUMAR V. VEDULA, PE) HAS | | | A DIGITAL SIGNATURE, PLEASE PROVIDE A DIGITALLY SIGNED | | | SOILS REPORT. IF THE ENGINEER DOES NOT HAVE A DIGITAL | | | SIGNATURE, PLEASE PROVIDE AN ORIGINAL SIGNED AND SEALED | | | SOILS REPORT. FS471, FAC61G15. | | | | | | THE STRUCTURAL CALCS ARE NOT DIGITALLY SIGNED; PLEASE | | | ADDRESS. | | | | | | 48. PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO BE REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF | | | RECORD, FBC 107. IF THE DESIGNER DOES NOT HAVE A | | | REFERENCE IN THE PLAN TO A SPECIFIC PRODUCT, A SHOP | | | DRAWING REVIEW STAMP ON EACH PRODUCT APPROVAL OR A | | | LETTER IS REQUIRED. THE ROOF PRODUCT APPROVALS AND SOME | | | WINDOWS AND DOORS (A4.7) ARE SPECIFICALLY REFERENCED IN | | | THE PLAN SO DO NOT REQUIRE DOR REVIEW STAMP. FOR ALL | | | OTHER ITEMS, PLEASE PROVIDE EVIDENCE OF DOR REVIEW. | | | | | | 49. NOA 14-0923.10 (AND OTHER PRODUCT APPROVALS) WERE | | | PRINTED AND UPLOADED WITH THE DRAWING PAGES REDUCED TO | | | HALF SIZE. THIS RESULTS IN ILLEGIBLE PRODUCT APPROVALS | | | WHEN PRINTED. PRODUCT APPROVALS IN THE FIELD ARE | | | REQUIRED FOR INSPECTION PURPOSES. PLEASE REPRINT THE | | | DRAWING PAGES IN LANDSCAPE ORIENTATION AND UPLOAD. THE | | | PAGES ON THE MIAMI DADE WEBSITE ARE DESIGNED TO BE | | | PRINTED 11X17, SO THE PAGES PROVIDED ARE 25% OF THE | | | INTENDED SIZE. CHECK ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AND UPLOAD | | | AS NEEDED. PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU NEED ADDITIONAL | | | INFORMATION. | | | | | | 50. ADVISORY ONLY; SOME (BUT NOT ALL) PRODUCT APPROVALS | | | HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED. APPLICANT MAY ELECT TO DEFER | | | PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTAL. THEY CAN BE SUBMITTED AFTER | | | PERMIT ISSUANCE, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, WITH NO | | | ADDITIONAL FEES. | | | | | | 51. SEE ROOF REVIEW COMMENTS: | | | | | | ROOF NOAS FOR JM TPO SUBMITTED; 14-0618.03, 13-0529.02 | | | | | | A. ROOF PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED BUT THE | | | ASSEMBLY PROPOSED WAS NOT SELECTED AND ENGINEERING FOR | | | ENHANCED FASTENING (WOOD DECK) WAS NOT PROVIDED. IF | | | THIS INFORMATION IS NOT PROVIDED PRIOR TO PERMIT | | | ISSUANCE, THE INFORMATION WILL BE REQUIRED AT TIME OF | | | ROOF SUB PERMIT SUBMITTAL. AN "N" WILL BE ENTERED FOR | | | THE ROOF PLAN REVIEW. | | | | | | ROOF ASSEMBLIES SELECTED TO COMPLY WITH THE (VULT) | | | PRESSURES SPECIFIED ON SHEET S6-1. | | | | | | B. SHEET S6-1, CLARIFY THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE "ROOF | | | MEMBRANE DESIGN PRESSSURE" VS. "GROSS UPLIFT DESIGN | | | PRESSURES." THE DESIGN PRESSURES TO BE UTILIZED FOR THE | | | TPO ROOF IS NOT CLEAR. | | | | | | C. SHEET S6-1, IT APPEARS THAT ROOF PRESSURES SPECIFIED | | | USE ZONE 2 PRESSURES FOR ZONE 3. THE STAIR ROOFS, | | | ELEVATOR ROOFS, CANOPIES (DETAIL 1-S4.1, A SHEETS | | | BUILDING SECTIONS, OTHER PLACES) DO NOT INCLUDE A 3FT | | | PARAPET, FBC 1609, ASCE7 10 30.6-1 NOTE 7. SEE ALSO | | | ROOF REVIEW COMMENTS. IT IS NOT CLEAR WHICH DESIGN | | | PRESSURES ARE SPECIFIED FOR THE ROOF. | | | | | | D. PLAN SHEET S1.9C AND OTHER SHEETS INCLUDE AN | | | INDICATOR FOR DETAIL 1 S9.1A; UNABLE TO LOCATE THIS | | | SHEET (S9.1A). PLEASE PROVIDE SHEET OR REVISE DETAIL | | | INDICATOR TO CORRECT LOCATION. | | | | | | | | | 52. ADVISORY ONLY, THE ART IN PUBLIC PLACES WAS SENT | | | VIA EMAIL, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CODE OF ORDINANCES | | | 78-123, 78-126. | | | | | | THIS PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH THE PROVISO THAT, | | | WITHIN 90 DAYS OF ISSUANCE, THE APPROVAL WILL BE | | | PROVIDED. PLEASE SEND A COPY OF THE APPROVAL WHEN | | | AVAILABLE VIA EMAIL TO [email protected] IN ORDER TO | | | DOCUMENT THE PERMIT FILE. | | | | | | PLEASE VERIFY THAT APPLICANT UNDERSTANDS THE | | | REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME FOR MORE | | | INFORMATION. | | | | | | 53. PROVISO; SEPARATE PERMITS (APPLICATION, PLANS, | | | FEES, REVIEW) REQUIRED FOR POOL. THE PLANS HAVE BEEN | | | MARKED ?VOID? AND HAVE NOT BEEN REVIEWED. | | | | | | 54. PROVISO; THE FOLLOWING PRODUCT APPROVALS OR SITE | | | SPECIFIC ENGINEERING ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED AND | | | REVIEWED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION: | | | | | | MECHANICAL LOUVERS | | | WINDOWS | | | SERIES 8000 ALUMINUM WINDOW WALL SYSTEM (15-0727.05, | | | SHEET A5.5) | | | DOORS | | | GENSTORM OPTION #1 LOUVER OUTSWING STEEL DOOR, DOUBLE | | | (A5.4) | | | OHD | | | BAR TELS FRAMELESS DOORS (A5.4) | | | ALL OTHER COMPONENTS AND CLADDING NOT SUBMITTED AND | | | REVIEWED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE | | | | | | GREEN SCREEN ALUMINUM FRAME SYSTEM | | | 2ND LEVEL METAL CANOPY | | | TRELLIS | | | SHADE STRUCTURES | | | RAILINGS | | | PRECAST CONCRETE (S7.0, DELEGATED ENGINEERING | | | CONNECTIONS) | | | PRECAST STAIRS AND LANDINGS | | | AWNINGS AND CANOPIES | | | OTHER DELEGATED ENGINEERING ITEMS | | | | | | 55. PROVISO, THE FOLLOWING TEST REPORTS FOR THE | | | FLOORING UNDERLAYMENT WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO | | | INSTALLATION (INFORMATIONAL NOTE: PER S2.4, S3.1 FLOOR | | | SLABS ARE 8IN, SO STC AND IIC TESTS ON AN 8IN SLAB OR | | | LESS ARE ACCEPTABLE): STC (FBC 1207.2), IIC (FBC | | | 1207.3), ASTM E 84 (FBC 603.1). | | | | | | 56. ADVISORY ONLY, FS 553.79(7)(C) ALL SHORING AND | | | RESHORING PROCEDURES, PLANS, AND DETAILS BE SUBMITTED | | | TO THE ENFORCEMENT AGENCY FOR RECORDKEEPING. | | | SHORING/RESHORE ENGINEERING IS TO BE SUBMITTED AT EACH | | | LIFT. FAILURE TO SUBMIT SHORING/RESHORE PLANS TO THE | | | BUILDING DIVISION FOR PLAN REVIEW AT THE TIME OF EACH | | | LIFT MAY RESULT IN A STOP WORK ORDER. AS THIS ISSUE HAS | | | BEEN PROBLEMATIC IN THE PAST, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT A | | | NOTE BE INCORPORATED INTO THE PLAN. | | | | | | 57. ADVISORY ONLY, WINDOW AND DOOR PRODUCT APPROVALS | | | SPECIFIED ON SHEET A4.7: | | | NOAS 15-0611.10, 15-0629.01, 13-0617.28, 14092309.09 | | | SPECIFIED. CHANGES FROM THE WINDOW AND DOORS SPECIFIED | | | WILL REQUIRE A REVISION (REVISED PLAN SHEET, NEW | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS). | | | | | | 58. A2.1, THE DOOR FOR UNIT 140 AND OTHER UNITS ARE NOT | | | LABELED, FBC 107. THE INDEX SHOWS A DOOR SCHEDULE FOR | | | THE AMENITY AREA. PLEASE ADVISE AS TO WHERE THE UNIT | | | ENTRY DOOR SCHEDULE IS LOCATED OR PROVIDE. | | | | | | 59. FBC 424.1.3.1.9, 424.2.17, POOL BARRIER PROPOSED IS | | | NOT CLEAR (WINDOWS LOCATED IN THE WALL WHICH SERVES AS | | | THE POOL BARRIER). | | | | | | 60. SHEET A6.1, ITEM 68 SPECIFIES RIGID INSULATION, NOA | | | 11-0516.02; THIS IS THE NOA NUMBER FOR WATERPROOFING, | | | REVISE; ALSO SEE OTHER COMMENTS REGARDING NOA NUMBERS | | | ON THE PLAN. | | | | | | 61. PROVIDE A GRAB BAR BACKING DETAIL, FBC 107. | | | | | | 62. FHA, NOT ALL OF THE SLIDING GLASS DOORS PROPOSED | | | ARE 6FT; FOR INSTANCE, SEE UNIT S2, SHEET A4.1. SEE | | | PAGE 3.10 OF THE FAIR HOUSING ACT DESIGN MANUAL AND THE | | | GUIDANCE REGARDING SLIDING GLASS PATIO DOORS (SECONDARY | | | DOOR) AND REVISE PLAN TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | | | | 63. DETAIL 2-S4.1 GRAPHICALLY DEPICTS AN EMBEDDED STRAP | | | BUT DOES NOT SPECIFY. PLEASE EITHER PROVIDE INFORMATION | | | AS TO WHERE THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND OR REVISE | | | PLAN TO SPECIFY CONNECTORS. | | | | | | 64. DETAILS 1 AND 2, S4.1, PLEASE PROVIDE DIRECTION AS | | | TO WHICH PLAN VIEW SHEET THE DETAIL INDICATOR FOR THESE | | | DETAILS ARE LOCATED. | | | | | | 65. FIRST FLOOR (LS 0.1 AND OTHER SHEETS), ADJACENT TO | | | STAIR 3, A RAMP IS SHOWN BUT NO STAIR TO ACCESS THE | | | RESIDENTIAL CORRIDOR FROM THE GARAGE. IT IS SUGGESTED | | | THAT AN ACCESSIBLE STAIR BE ADDED. THE RAMP ADDS | | | DISTANCE TO THE PATH OF TRAVEL WHICH COULD BE A | | | HARDSHIP FOR SOMEONE WHO IS DISABLED OR COMPROMISED, | | | DOES NOT USE A WHEELCHAIR AND IS ABLE TO NAVIGATE A | | | STAIR. | | | | | | 66. SEE THE ROOF REVIEW: | | | | | | ROOF NOAS FOR JM TPO SUBMITTED; 14-0618.03, 13-0529.02 | | | | | | A. ROOF PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED BUT THE | | | ASSEMBLY PROPOSED WAS NOT SELECTED AND ENGINEERING FOR | | | ENHANCED FASTENING (WOOD DECK) WAS NOT PROVIDED. IF | | | THIS INFORMATION IS NOT PROVIDED PRIOR TO PERMIT | | | ISSUANCE, THE INFORMATION WILL BE REQUIRED AT TIME OF | | | ROOF SUB PERMIT SUBMITTAL. AN "N" WILL BE ENTERED FOR | | | THE ROOF PLAN REVIEW. | | | | | | ROOF ASSEMBLIES SELECTED TO COMPLY WITH THE (VULT) | | | PRESSURES SPECIFIED ON SHEET S6-1. | | | | | | B. SHEET S6-1, CLARIFY PURPOSE OF "ROOF MEMBRANE DESIGN | | | PRESSSURE" VS. "GROSS UPLIFT DESIGN PRESSURES." THE | | | DESIGN PRESSURES TO BE UTILIZED FOR THE TPO ROOF IS NOT | | | CLEAR. | | | | | | C. SHEET S6-1, ROOF PRESSURES SPECIFIED USE ZONE 2 | | | PRESSURES FOR ZONE 3. IT APPEARS THAT THE STAIR ROOF, | | | ELEVATOR ROOF DO NOT INCLUDE A 3FT PARAPET, FBC 1609, | | | ASCE7 10 30.6-1 NOTE 7. | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-10-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vperez |
Date |
2016-10-25 |
Time |
14:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vperez |
Date |
2016-10-25 |
Time |
14:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-08-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
albarran |
Date |
2016-08-15 |
Time |
14:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
albarran |
Date |
2016-08-15 |
Time |
12:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-08-15 14:49:50 | STAMPED NEW SHEETS PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY | | | VP |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-06-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vperez |
Date |
2016-06-16 |
Time |
15:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vperez |
Date |
2016-06-16 |
Time |
15:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-02-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vperez |
Date |
2016-02-24 |
Time |
05:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vperez |
Date |
2016-02-24 |
Time |
05:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-02-24 05:25:43 | INITIAL ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | | | | | APPLICABLE CODES IN EFFECT: | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2014 5TH EDITION | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ENERGY CONSERVATION 2014 5TH | | | EDITION | | | NFPA 70- 2011 NEC | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. SHEET LT-1- PROVIDE A BLOCK NOTE INDICATING THE | | | REQUIRED SEPARATE PERMITS AND DATA CUT SHEET SUBMITTALS | | | FOR ALL SITE LIGHTING AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT. A NOTE | | | WILL SUFFICE. | | | 2. GENERAL NOTES- PROVIDE A BLOCK NOTE INDICATING THE | | | REQUIRED SEPARATE PERMITS AND DATA CUT SHEET SUBMITTALS | | | FOR FIRE PUMP ALL LOW VOLTAGE SYSTEMS TO INCLUDE BUT | | | NOT LIMITED TO FIRE ALARM, ACCESS CONTROLS, CCTV, PHONE | | | AND DATA, SIGNAGE, WIRELESS SYSTEMS, CAR CHARGING | | | STATIONS, ETC. A NOTE WILL SUFFICE. | | | 3. PLEASE PROVIDE DATA SHEETS FOR THE EMERGENCY | | | INVERTERS SHOWN ON DESIGN. FBC 107.3.5 | | | 4. SHOW TWO MEANS OF ACCESS AND EGRESS FOR THE MAIN | | | ELECTRICAL ROOM #1. COULD NOT DETERMINE SIZE OF THE | | | ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT IN ROOM. NEC 110.26C2 | | | 5. SHEET E3.3- PLEASE LABEL RECEPTACLE IN WORK ROOM TO | | | BE GFCI PROTECTED PER NEC 210.8B5- IF WITHIN 6FT OF | | | SINK ALL TO BE GFCI. | | | 6. SHEET E3.5- PLEASE LABEL RECEPTACLE IN KITCHEN AND | | | PRIVATE LOUNGE TO BE GFCI PROTECTED PER NEC 210.8B5- IF | | | WITHIN 6FT OF SINK, ALL TO BE GFCI. | | | 7. ON UNIT PLANS DRAWINGS CORRECT TYPO ON APARTMENT | | | FEEDER SCHEDULE TO INDICATE ALUMINUM CONDUCTORS BEING | | | USED NOT COPPER. PLEASE CORRELATE FBC 107.3.5 | | | 8. SHEET E5.2- RISER DIAGRAM; PLEASE CLARIFY MAIN 2 OF | | | 2 3500A MCB WITH 6 SETS OF 600 ALUMINUM WIRES. 600AL IS | | | GOOD FOR 340AMP AT 75 DEGREE TERMINAL RATINGS, NEC | | | 310.15B16. UNDERSIZED AS SHOWN FOR A 3500 MCB. CLARIFY | | | AND CORRECT. | | | 9. NOTE THAT PER NEC 230.2 THIS PROJECT MEETS THE | | | REQUIREMENTS FOR MULTIPLE SERVICES DUE TO CAPACITY | | | LIMITS. REGARDLESS, SPECIAL PERMISSION FROM AHJ TO BE | | | GRANTED PER DESIGN SHOWN. PROVIDE IN WRITING A REQUEST | | | PER CODE SECTION CITED TO AHJ. GENERAL NOTES TO BE | | | PLACED FOR FIRST RESPONDERS SAFETY. FIRE REVIEW MIGHT | | | REQUIRE OTHER MEANS TO SHUNT SERVICES. FBC 107.3.5 | | | 10. PROVIDE FROM UTILITY PROVIDER (FPL), ACTUAL | | | AVAILABLE FAULT CURRENT AT THE TRANSFORMERS. NOTE NOT | | | SUFFICIENT AT THIS TIME. FBC 107.3.5 | | | 11. PROVIDE AIC CALCULATION PER NEC 110.10- FBC 107.3.5 | | | 12. PROVIDE A NOTE/SIGN TO INDICATE THE REQUIREMENTS | | | NEC 110.24 THE MAX. AVAILABLE FAULT CURRENT SHALL BE | | | DURABLY MARKED AND DATED ON ALL ELECTRICAL APPARATUS | | | AND NEC 110.16 ARC-FLASH HAZARD WARNING LABELS | | | REQUIRED. | | | 13. PER FBC EC 405.7.3- SHOW VOLTAGE DROP CALCULATIONS | | | FOR FEEDERS AND BRANCH CIRCUITS. | | | 14. CLARIFY SELECTION OF SERVICE AND FEEDER CONDUCTORS | | | AS SHOWN ON RISER DIAGRAM. FOR EXAMPLE PANEL 3UDP SHOWS | | | A 3500A MCB WITH SERVICE CONDUCTORS SIZED AT 2040AMP (2 | | | SETS OF 4#600 AL.). THE CALCULATED LOADS ON SHEET E5.01 | | | FOR THE METER CENTERS IS SHOWN AT 608+680=(1288) * 2= | | | 2576AMPS DEMAND LOADS. PLEASE REVISIT LOADS AND | | | CONDUCTOR SIZES AS SHOWN. SEE NEC 240.4C- PROTECTION OF | | | CONDUCTORS. NEC 310.15B16 TABLE OF AMPACITIES BASED ON | | | 75 DEGREE COLUMN FOR TERMINAL RATINGS. NEC 110.14C. | | | VERIFY ENTIRE RISER DIAGRAM. | | | 15. COMMENTS MAY FOLLOW UPON RE-REVIEW. PLEASE FEEL | | | FREE TO CONTACT ME SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS | | | REGARDING THIS PROJECT. | | | | | | | | | VALENTINO PEREZ | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER II | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-07-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
Mgonzale |
Date |
2016-07-20 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mgonzale |
Date |
2016-07-20 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2016-07-20 08:55:16 | NO OBJECTION, PRJECT HAS FORMALLY BEEN SUBMITTED THRU | | | ENGINEERING. | | | | | | MANUEL JULIAN GONZALEZ | | | ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR | | | PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | | | (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402) | | | MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 | | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1085 | | | FAX: (561) 494-1116 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING | | | | | | IMPORTANT MESSAGE: AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015 THE CITY OF | | | WEST PALM BEACH | | | CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED, | | | MAKING KNOWN THAT "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD | | | FREE." | | | FOR MORE INFORMATION REFER TO THE LINK BELOW: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLI | | | CATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-03-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
Mgonzale |
Date |
2016-03-31 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
mgonzale |
Date |
2016-03-31 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2016-03-31 19:43:27 | PLAN REVISIONS WILL HAVE TO BE SUBMITTED TO REFLECT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW | | | SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | [email protected] | | 2016-03-16 14:10:18 | ENGINEERING REVIEW WILL BE PERFORMED DURING THE 2ND | | | REVIEW CYCLE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-09-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rlindow |
Date |
2016-08-31 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rlindow |
Date |
2016-08-29 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-08-29 15:53:53 | | | | | | | 8/29/2016 | | | R. LINDOW | | | | | | | | | APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING PROVISO: | | | | | | 1) THE FIRE PLACE IS NOT APPROVED AT THIS TIME. PROVIDE | | | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON GAS APPLIANCE TO COMPLY WITH | | | ALL APLICABLE REQUIREMENTS. THIS SHOULD INCLUDE | | | OPERATIONAL SAFE GUARDS, MAINTENANCE PROCESSES, | | | ETC...... | | | | | | 2) SHEET 039-LS-0.1 ADD ADDITIONAL DOOR/ GATE TO | | | ACCOMODATE OCCUPANT LOAD AT NORTH EXIT FROM POOL AREA. | | | | | | 3) "NO PARKING FIRE LANE" SIGNAGE IS REQUIRED. SEE | | | SHEET 012-C-09 | | | | | | 4) THE PROPOSED PROJECT SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF | | | THE 5TH EDITION OF FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE | | | INCLUDING THE 2012 EDITION OF NFPA 1 AND NFPA 101 AND | | | ALL OTHER APPLICABLE CODES OR STANDARDS. | | | | | | 5) SEPARATE PLANS AND PERMITS NEEDED FOR PRIVATE | | | UNDERGROUND FIRE LINE AND FIRE HYDRANTS. | | | | | | 6) EMERGENCY ILLUMINATION SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR A | | | MINIMUM OF 1.5 HOURS IN THE EVENT OF FAILURE OF NORMAL | | | LIGHTING. EMERGENCY LIGHTING FACILITIES SHALL BE | | | ARRANGED TO PROVIDE INITIAL ILLUMINATION THAT IS NOT | | | LESS THAN AN AVERAGE OF 1 FT-CANDLE AND, AT ANY POINT, | | | NOT LESS THAN 0.1 FT-CANDLE, MEASURED ALONG THE PATH OF | | | EGRESS AT FLOOR LEVEL. | | | | | | 7)PER SECTION 7.2.2.5.4 - STAIRWAY IDENTIFICATION: NEW | | | ENCLOSED STAIRS SERVING THREE OR MORE STORIES AND | | | EXISTING ENCLOSED STAIRS SERVING FIVE OR MORE STORIES | | | SHALL COMPLY WITH (A) THROUGH (L). | | | (A) THE STAIRS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH SPECIAL SIGNAGE | | | WITHIN THE ENCLOSURE AT EACH FLOOR LANDING. | | | (B) THE SIGNAGE SHALL INDICATE THE FLOOR LEVEL. | | | (C) THE SIGNAGE SHALL INDICATE THE TERMINUS OF THE TOP | | | AND BOTTOM OF THE STAIR ENCLOSURE. | | | (D) THE SIGNAGE SHALL INDICATE THE IDENTIFICATION OF | | | THE STAIR ENCLOSURE. | | | (E) THE SIGNAGE SHALL INDICATE THE FLOOR LEVEL OF, AND | | | THE DIRECTION TO, EXIT DISCHARGE. | | | (F) THE SIGNAGE SHALL BE LOCATED INSIDE THE ENCLOSURE | | | APPROXIMATELY 60-INCHES ABOVE THE FLOOR LANDING IN A | | | POSITION THAT IS VISIBLE WHEN THE DOOR IS IN THE OPEN | | | OR CLOSED POSITION. | | | (G) THE FLOOR LEVEL DESIGNATION SHALL ALSO BE TACTILE. | | | (H) THE SIGNAGE SHALL BE PAINTED OR STENCILED ON THE | | | WALL OR ON A SEPARATE SIGN SECURELY ATTACHED TO THE | | | WALL. | | | (I) THE STAIRWAY IDENTIFICATION LETTER SHALL BE LOCATED | | | AT THE TOP OF THE SIGN IN MINIMUM 1-INCH HIGH | | | LETTERING. | | | (J) SIGNAGE THAT READS ?NO ROOF ACCESS? AND IS LOCATED | | | UNDER THE STAIRWAY IDENTIFICATION LETTER SHALL | | | DESIGNATE STAIRWAYS THAT DO NOT PROVIDE ROOF ACCESS. | | | LETTERING SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 1-INCH HIGH. | | | (K) THE FLOOR LEVEL NUMBER SHALL BE LOCATED IN THE | | | MIDDLE OF THE SIGN IN MINIMUM 5-INCH HIGH NUMBERS. | | | MEZZANINE LEVELS SHALL HAVE THE LETTER ?M? OR OTHER | | | APPROPRIATE IDENTIFICATION LETTER PRECEDING THE FLOOR | | | NUMBER, WHILE BASEMENT LEVELS SHALL HAVE THE LETTER ?B? | | | OR OTHER APPROPRIATE IDENTIFICATION LETTER PRECEDING | | | THE FLOOR LEVEL NUMBER. | | | (L) IDENTIFICATION OF THE LOWER AND UPPER TERMINUS OF | | | THE STAIRWAY SHALL BE LOCATED AT THE BOTTOM OF THE SIGN | | | IN MINIMUM 1-INCH HIGH LETTERS OR NUMBERS. | | | | | | 8) WET FIRE HYDRANTS ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO, DURING AND | | | AFTER CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | 9) WHERE THE MOST REMOTE PORTION OF A NONSPRINKLERED | | | FLOOR OR STORY IS LOCATED IN EXCESS OF 150 FT (45.7 M) | | | OF TRAVEL DISTANCE FROM A REQUIRED EXIT CONTAINING OR | | | ADJACENT TO A HOSE CONNECTION OR THE MOST REMOTE | | | PORTION OF A SPRINKLERED FLOOR OR STORY IS LOCATED IN | | | EXCESS OF 200 FT (61 M) OF TRAVEL DISTANCE FROM A | | | REQUIRED EXIT CONTAINING OR ADJACENT TO A HOSE | | | CONNECTION, | | | ADDITIONAL HOSE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED, IN | | | APPROVED LOCATIONS, WHERE REQUIRED BY THE LOCAL FIRE | | | DEPARTMENT OR THE AHJ. | | | | | | 10) NFPA 13, A BUILDING, WHERE PROTECTED BY AN | | | AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM INSTALLATION, SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED WITH SPRINKLERS IN ALL AREAS EXCEPT WHERE | | | SPECIFIC SECTIONS OF THIS STANDARD PERMIT THE OMISSION | | | OF SPRINKLERS. | | | | | | 11) THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH REQUIRES CONSTRUCTION | | | TRAILERS LARGER THAN A SINGLE "DOUBLE WIDE" (OR TWO | | | "SINGLE WIDE") TO EITHER BE PROTECTED BY AN AUTOMATIC | | | SPRINKLER SYSTEM OR COMPLY WITH THE SEPARATION | | | REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 241. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION | | | TRAILERS OR MODULAR BUILDINGS WILL REQUIRE A PERMIT AND | | | COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: | | | PER NFPA 241- STANDARD FOR SAFEGUARDING CONSTRUCTION, | | | ALTERATION, AND DEMOLITION OPERATIONS, SECTION 4.2: | | | TEMPORARY OFFICES, TRAILERS, AND OTHER FACILITIES OF | | | COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION OR HOUSING COMBUSTIBLE | | | CONTENTS SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM ADJACENT BUILDINGS, | | | TRAILERS OR STRUCTURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH TABLE 4.2.1. | | | PER TABLE 4.2.1: | | | 1) 20 FEET EXPOSED LENGTH SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM | | | ADJACENT STRUCTURES BY AT LEAST 30 FEET | | | 2) 30 FEET EXPOSED LENGTH SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM | | | ADJACENT STRUCTURES BY AT LEAST 35 FEET | | | 3) 40 FEET EXPOSED LENGTH SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM | | | ADJACENT STRUCTURES BY AT LEAST 40 FEET | | | 4) 50 FEET EXPOSED LENGTH SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM | | | ADJACENT STRUCTURES BY AT LEAST 45 FEET | | | 5) 60 FEET EXPOSED LENGTH SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM | | | ADJACENT STRUCTURES BY AT LEAST 50 FEET | | | 6) GREATER THAN 60 FEET EXPOSED LENGTH SHALL BE | | | SEPARATED FROM ADJACENT STRUCTURES BY AT LEAST 60 FEET | | | **A 75 PERCENT REDUCTION IN SEPARATION DISTANCES SHALL | | | BE PERMITTED TO BE APPLIED, PROVIDED AUTOMATIC | | | SPRINKLER PROTECTION IS USED IN THE EXPOSING STRUCTURE. | | | | | | PER NFPA 241 SECTION 4.2.2: DETACHMENT BETWEEN | | | TEMPORARY STRUCTURES, ADEQUATE TEMPORARY FIXED FIRE | | | PROTECTION SYSTEMS, AND PORTABLE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED AS REQUIRED BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING | | | JURISDICTION. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-06-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rlindow |
Date |
2016-06-23 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rlindow |
Date |
2016-06-23 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-06-23 15:20:27 | ROY LINDOW-6/23/16 | | | FIRE PLANS EXAMINER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | [email protected] | | | | | | 1) SHEET 20?M3.1C, THIS SHEET SHOWS KITCHEN RANGE ON | | | DRAWING. THE EXHAUST HOOD SHOWN ON PLANS IS NOT SHOWN | | | OVER RANGE. KITCHEN EXHAUST AND FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM | | | REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMIT AND DRAWINGS. | | | 2) SHEET 094-A-5.4 & SHEET 095-A-5.4.1 DOOR SCHEDULE, | | | THE REMARKS KEY DOES NOT SHOW A SEPARATE KEY ITEM FOR | | | LISTED FIRE EXIT HARDWARE. PROVIDE A KEY FOR ALL FIRE | | | RATED DOORS TO HAVE LISTED FIRE EXIT HARDWARE. | | | | | | 7.2.1.7.2 ONLY APPROVED PANIC HARDWARE SHALL BE USED ON | | | DOOR | | | ASSEMBLIES THAT ARE NOT FIRE-RATED DOOR ASSEMBLIES. | | | ONLY APPROVED FIRE | | | EXIT HARDWARE SHALL BE USED ON FIRE-RATED DOOR | | | ASSEMBLIES. NEW PANIC | | | HARDWARE AND NEW FIRE EXIT HARDWARE SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | ANSI/UL | | | 305, STANDARD FOR SAFETY PANIC HARDWARE, AND ANSI/BHMA | | | A156.3, EXIT DEVICES. | | | | | | 3) SHEET 012-C-09, PROVIDE NO PARKING FIRE LANE SIGNAGE | | | (SEE PROVISO). | | | | | | 4) SHEET 042-LS-0.4, LEVELS 4-7, EXIT DOORS FROM THIS | | | SPACE ARE NOT REMOTE PER SECTION, | | | 7.5.1.3.3 IN BUILDINGS PROTECTED THROUGHOUT BY AN | | | APPROVED, | | | SUPERVISED AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH SECTION | | | 9.7, THE MINIMUM SEPARATION DISTANCE BETWEEN TWO EXITS, | | | EXIT | | | ACCESSES, OR EXIT DISCHARGES, MEASURED IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH 7.5.1.3.2, | | | SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN ONE-THIRD THE LENGTH OF THE | | | MAXIMUM OVERALL | | | DIAGONAL DIMENSION OF THE BUILDING OR AREA TO BE | | | SERVED. | | | | | | 5) SHEET 051-A-2.4, EXIT DOORS FROM ASSEMBLY AREAS AND | | | OTHER SPACES THAT EXCEED 100 OCCUPANT LOAD ARE NOT | | | PROVIDED WITH PANIC HARDWARE. COORDINATE WITH DOOR | | | SCHEDULE TO INDICATE CORRECT HARDWARE IS PROVIDED. | | | EXAMPLES OF DOORS (412, 413, ST 401, ST 403 AND ST | | | 406). | | | | | | 12.2.2.2.3 ANY DOOR IN A REQUIRED MEANS OF EGRESS FROM | | | AN AREA | | | HAVING AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF 100 OR MORE PERSONS SHALL BE | | | PERMITTED TO BE PROVIDED WITH A LATCH OR LOCK ONLY IF | | | THE LATCH OR | | | LOCK IS PANIC HARDWARE OR FIRE EXIT HARDWARE COMPLYING | | | WITH | | | 7.2.1.7, UNLESS OTHERWISE PERMITTED BY ONE OF THE | | | FOLLOWING: | | | | | | 6) SHEET 051-A-2.4, EXIT DOOR SHOWN ON PLANS AS ST-405 | | | SWINGS IN THE WRONG DIRECTION IN ADDITION IT IS NOT | | | INCLUDED ON THE DOOR SCHEDULE AND WILL ALSO REQUIRE | | | PANIC HARDWARE. | | | | | | 7) SHEET 044-A-2.1, DOORS SHOWN AS DOOR 139, 131 & 132 | | | APPEAR TO SWING GREATER THAT 50% OF THE REQUIRED EXIT | | | WIDTH AND EXCEED MAXIMUM PROJECTION PER SECTION, | | | 7.2.1.4.3 | | | | | | 8) THIS IS FROM A PREVIOUS LIST OF COMMENTS #12 ON | | | PREVIOUS LIST. | | | SHEET 040-LS-0.2, PROVIDE ONE HOUR RATING TO SEPARATE | | | CORRIDOR FROM GARAGE. | | | ARROW POINTS TO AREA IN QUESTION. | | | | | | 9) SHEET 092-A-5.2.2, DUPLICATE NOTE. PLEASE REMOVE GAS | | | FIREPLACE FROM PLANS. | | | | | | 10) SHEET 317-FS2.7B, AND SHEET 316-FS2.7A, REQUIRED | | | FIRE SPRINKLER COVERAGE IS NOT PROVIDED FOR ELEVATOR | | | MACHINE ROOMS. | | | | | | 11) SHEET-044-A-2.1, PROVISO NOTE ADDED TO PLANS. | | | | | | 12) GENERAL COMMENT, DO NOT UTILIZE EXIT MARKING | | | SIGNAGE AS A METHOD TO DIRECT VEHICLES OUT OF GARAGE. | | | | | | 13) SHEET 241-E2.7A AND SHEET 242-E2.7B, PROVIDE | | | REQUIRED EMERGENCY LIGHTING FOR EGRESS FROM ROOF. | | | | | | 14) PER NFPA 241 SECTION 8.7.2.3, WHERE UNDERGROUND | | | WATER MAINS AND HYDRANTS ARE TO BE PROVIDED, THEY SHALL | | | BE INSTALLED, COMPLETED, AND IN SERVICE PRIOR TO | | | CONSTRUCTION WORK. | | | | | | 15) REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AHJ SHALL NOT RELIEVE | | | THE OWNER, CONTRACTOR, ETC. OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF | | | COMPLIANCE WITH CODE (NFPA 1, SECTION 1.14.4). | | | | | | 16) EVERY ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY ROOM NOT HAVING FIXED | | | SEATS SHALL HAVE THE OCCUPANT LOAD OF THE ROOM POSTED | | | IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE NEAR THE MAIN EXIT FROM THE | | | ROOM. SIGNS SHALL BE DURABLE AND INDICATE THE NUMBER OF | | | OCCUPANTS PERMITTED FOR EACH ROOM. | | | | | | 17) FIRE-RATED WALLS | | | PER SECTION 8.3.2.4, EACH FIRE BARRIER SHALL BE | | | PERMANENTLY IDENTIFIED WITH SIGNS OR STENCILING READING | | | FIRE BARRIER-PROTECT ALL OPENINGS. CHARACTERS SHALL BE | | | AT LEAST 4-INCHES IN HEIGHT AND HALF-INCH IN WIDTH. | | | IDENTIFICATION SHALL BE SPACED NOT MORE THAN 15 FEET ON | | | CENTER. | | | PER SECTION 8.3.5.1, PENETRATIONS THROUGH A FIRE-RATED | | | WALL ASSEMBLY SHALL BE PROTECTED BY A FIRE STOP SYSTEM | | | OR DEVICE | | | . | | | 18) TACTILE SIGNAGE SHALL BE INSTALLED AT ALL EXIT | | | DOORS. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-03-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rlindow |
Date |
2016-03-17 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rlindow |
Date |
2016-03-08 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-03-08 13:24:10 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY ROY LINDOW( | | | [email protected]), FIRE INSPECTOR, BUREAU OF FIRE | | | PREVENTION, WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | 1) -SHEET 043- LS 0.5 | | | ONE HOUR RATED WALL IS NOT PROVIDED FOR CORRIDOR OF SE | | | CORNER OF BUILDING ACROSS FROM STAIR #4. | | | | | | 2) -SHEET 043- LS 0.5 | | | ADD REQUIRED EXIT SIGNS TO SOUTH AND NORTH CORRIDOR. | | | DISTANCE EXCEEDS MAXIMUM OF 100 FT. | | | | | | 3) -SHEET 043- LS 0.5 | | | ACCOUNT FOR CAPACITY OF EACH EXIT DOOR AND HOW | | | OCCUPANCY LOAD IS SPLIT UP. | | | | | | 4) -SHEET 042- LS-0.4 | | | ADD REQUIRED EXIT SIGNS TO SOUTH AND NORTH CORRIDOR. | | | DISTANCE EXCEEDS MAXIMUM OF 100 FT. | | | | | | 5) -SHEET 042- LS-0.4 | | | EXIT DOORS SWING WRONG DIRECTION FOR ASSEMBLY SPACE AT | | | NORTH SIDE OF BUILDING (TERRACE FLOOR 4). | | | | | | 6) -SHEET 042- LS-0.4 | | | ONE HOUR RATED WALL IS NOT PROVIDED FOR CORRIDOR OF SE | | | CORNER OF BUILDING ACROSS FROM STAIR #4. | | | | | | 7) -SHEET 042- LS-0.4 | | | PROVIDE ONE HOUR RATING TO SEPARATE THE ASSEMBLY | | | OCCUPANCY FROM APARTMENT OCCUPANCY. | | | | | | 8) -SHEET 042- LS-0.4 | | | ACCOUNT FOR CAPACITY OF EACH EXIT DOOR AND HOW | | | OCCUPANCY LOAD IS SPLIT UP. | | | | | | 9)-SHEET 041-LS-0.3 | | | ADD REQUIRED EXIT SIGNS TO SOUTH AND NORTH CORRIDOR. | | | DISTANCE EXCEEDS MAXIMUM OF 100 FT. | | | | | | 10)-SHEET 041-LS-0.3 | | | ACCOUNT FOR CAPACITY OF EACH EXIT DOOR AND HOW | | | OCCUPANCY LOAD IS SPLIT UP. | | | | | | 11) -SHEET 040-LS-0.2 | | | PER SECTION 6.1.14.4.1 | | | PROVIDE ONE HOUR RATING TO SEPARATE THE ASSEMBLY | | | OCCUPANCY FROM APARTMENT OCCUPANCY. | | | | | | 12) -SHEET 040-LS-0.2 | | | PROVIDE ONE HOUR RATING TO SEPARATE CORRIDOR FROM | | | GARAGE. | | | | | | 13) -SHEET 040-LS-0.2 | | | ADD REQUIRED EXIT SIGNS TO SOUTH CORRIDOR. DISTANCE | | | EXCEEDS MAXIMUM OF 100 FT. | | | | | | 14) -SHEET 040-LS-0.2 | | | ACCOUNT FOR CAPACITY OF EACH EXIT DOOR AND HOW | | | OCCUPANCY LOAD IS SPLIT UP. | | | | | | 15) -SHEET 039- LS-0.1 | | | TWO HOUR ENCLOURE FOR STAIR #2 MISSING DOOR. | | | | | | 16) -SHEET 039- LS-0.1 | | | ADD REQUIRED EXIT SIGNS TO GARAGE. DISTANCE EXCEEDS | | | MAXIMUM OF 100 FT. | | | | | | 17) -SHEET 039- LS-0.1 | | | ADD REQUIRED EXIT SIGNS TO SOUTH CORRIDOR. DISTANCE | | | EXCEEDS MAXIMUM OF 100 FT. | | | | | | 18) -SHEET 039- LS-0.1 | | | ELECTRIC ROOM, PER NFPA 70, PROVIDE REQUIRED PANIC | | | HARDWARE. | | | | | | 19) -SHEET 039- LS-0.1 | | | ACCOUNT FOR CAPACITY OF EACH EXIT DOOR AND HOW | | | OCCUPANCY LOAD IS SPLIT UP. | | | | | | 20) -SHEET 039- LS-0.1 | | | COMMON PATH OF TRAVEL EXCEEDED IN PARKING GARAGE(100 | | | FEET). | | | | | | 21) -SHEET 039- LS-0.1 | | | PLANS SHOW "AREA OF REFUGED#1"? PROVIDE ADDITIONAL | | | INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THIS AREA. | | | | | | 22) -SHEET 092-A5.2.2 | | | GAS FIREPLACE IS NOT PERMITTED. | | | PER SECTION 10.11.8.1- INCINERATORS, OUTDOOR | | | FIREPLACES, PERMANENT BARBECUES, | | | AND GRILLS SHALL NOT BE BUILT, INSTALLED, OR MAINTAINED | | | WITHOUT | | | PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE AHJ. | | | | | | 23) -SHEET 044-A-2.1 | | | 3' GATE IN THE MEANS OF EGRESS USED FOR ACCESS CONTROL | | | REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH FFPC PER SECTION 7.2.1.6.2 | | | | | | 24) -SHEET-090-A-5.1.6 | | | CONDITION SHOWN ON PLAN.SEPARATE FIRE SUPPRESSION AND | | | EXHAUST HOOD PLANS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 25) -SHEET-249-E-4.1 | | | PLAN SHOWS SMOKE DETECTORS WHERE SMOKE ALARMS ARE | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | 26) -SHEET-012-C-09 | | | FIRE HYDRANTS ARE TO BE ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET | | | AS FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION. | | | | | | 27) -ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR | | | THIS DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED | | | AND IDENTIFIED ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH | | | THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. | | | | | | 28) -ALL FIRE DEPARTMENT SPRINKLER SYSTEM CONNECTIONS | | | (FDC,S) FOR THE PROJECT SHALL BE IDENTIFIED | | | AND COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. | | | | | | 29) -LIFE SAFETY PLANS AND ELECTRICAL PLANS. SHOW ALL | | | EMERGENCY LIGHTING. PLANS NEED TO BE SIMILAR IN | | | LOCATION AND IN CONCEPT. | | | | | | 30) - DOOR SCHEDULE DOES NOT INCLUDE ALL RATED DOORS IN | | | BUILDING. VERIFY ACCURACY TO INCLUDE ALL RATED DOORS. | | | | | | | | | | | | GENERAL COMMENTS NOTED BELOW: | | | | | | -ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A. | | | | | | -ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7 KEYWAY | | | SYSTEM. | | | | | | -CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE | | | PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. | | | A PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER | | | RELATED TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN | | | STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY | | | MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PROTECTION. | | | | | | -SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | -THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM ALL | | | ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. ADDRESS | | | NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND | | | AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT | | | WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | -DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE REMOVED | | | FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE | | | ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS. | | | | | | -ALL STAIRWELL ENCLOSURES. | | | PER SECTION 7.2.2.5.4 - STAIRWAY IDENTIFICATION: NEW | | | ENCLOSED STAIRS SERVING THREE OR MORE STORIES AND | | | EXISTING ENCLOSED STAIRS SERVING FIVE OR MORE STORIES | | | SHALL COMPLY WITH (A) THROUGH (L). | | | (A) THE STAIRS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH SPECIAL SIGNAGE | | | WITHIN THE ENCLOSURE AT EACH FLOOR LANDING. | | | (B) THE SIGNAGE SHALL INDICATE THE FLOOR LEVEL. | | | (C) THE SIGNAGE SHALL INDICATE THE TERMINUS OF THE TOP | | | AND BOTTOM OF THE STAIR ENCLOSURE. | | | (D) THE SIGNAGE SHALL INDICATE THE IDENTIFICATION OF | | | THE STAIR ENCLOSURE. | | | (E) THE SIGNAGE SHALL INDICATE THE FLOOR LEVEL OF, AND | | | THE DIRECTION TO, EXIT DISCHARGE. | | | (F) THE SIGNAGE SHALL BE LOCATED INSIDE THE ENCLOSURE | | | APPROXIMATELY 60-INCHES ABOVE THE FLOOR LANDING IN A | | | POSITION THAT IS VISIBLE WHEN THE DOOR IS IN THE OPEN | | | OR CLOSED POSITION. | | | (G) THE FLOOR LEVEL DESIGNATION SHALL ALSO BE TACTILE. | | | (H) THE SIGNAGE SHALL BE PAINTED OR STENCILED ON THE | | | WALL OR ON A SEPARATE SIGN SECURELY ATTACHED TO THE | | | WALL. | | | (I) THE STAIRWAY IDENTIFICATION LETTER SHALL BE LOCATED | | | AT THE TOP OF THE SIGN IN MINIMUM 1-INCH HIGH | | | LETTERING. | | | (J) SIGNAGE THAT READS ?NO ROOF ACCESS? AND IS LOCATED | | | UNDER THE STAIRWAY IDENTIFICATION LETTER SHALL | | | DESIGNATE STAIRWAYS THAT DO NOT PROVIDE ROOF ACCESS. | | | LETTERING SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 1-INCH HIGH. | | | (K) THE FLOOR LEVEL NUMBER SHALL BE LOCATED IN THE | | | MIDDLE OF THE SIGN IN MINIMUM 5-INCH HIGH NUMBERS. | | | MEZZANINE LEVELS SHALL HAVE THE LETTER ?M? OR OTHER | | | APPROPRIATE IDENTIFICATION LETTER PRECEDING THE FLOOR | | | NUMBER, WHILE BASEMENT LEVELS SHALL HAVE THE LETTER ?B? | | | OR OTHER APPROPRIATE IDENTIFICATION LETTER PRECEDING | | | THE FLOOR LEVEL NUMBER. | | | (L) IDENTIFICATION OF THE LOWER AND UPPER TERMINUS OF | | | THE STAIRWAY SHALL BE LOCATED AT THE BOTTOM OF THE SIGN | | | IN MINIMUM 1-INCH HIGH LETTERS OR NUMBERS. | | | | | | -FOR ASSEMBLY AND EDUCATIONAL OCCUPANCIES WITH AN | | | OCCUPANT LOAD OF 100 OR MORE PERSONS (50 PERSONS PER | | | THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE), PANIC HARDWARE SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED ON DOORS TO RELEASE THE LOCK/LATCH. NO OTHER | | | LOCKS OR LATCHES ARE PERMITTED THAT WOULD NOT BE | | | RELEASED BY THE PANIC HARDWARE. AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR | | | PANIC HARDWARE, THE MAIN ENTRANCE IS PERMITTED TO HAVE | | | AN INTERIOR KEYED DOOR LOCK (AND NO LATCH) WITH A | | | READILY VISIBLE SIGN STATING THIS DOOR TO REMAIN | | | UNLOCKED WHEN THE BUILDING IS OCCUPIED. SIGN LETTERS | | | SHALL BE AT LEAST 1 INCH IN HEIGHT. A THUMB TURN STYLE | | | LOCK IS NOT PERMITTED TO BE SUBSTITUTED FOR A KEYED | | | LOCK. | | | | | | -PROVIDE DRAWING NOTE INDICATING ALL CONSTRUCTION AND | | | DEMOLITION WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF | | | NFPA 241. TRASH AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS SHALL BE | | | REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY. SMOKING SHALL BE | | | PROHIBITED EXCEPT IN DESIGNATED EXTERIOR AREAS. ALL | | | OTHER DEMOLITION OR CONSTRUCTION AREAS SHALL HAVE "NO | | | SMOKING" SIGNS POSTED. WHERE SMOKING IS PERMITTED, SAFE | | | RECEPTACLES FOR SMOKING MATERIALS SHALL BE PROVIDED. | | | | | | -SEPARATE PLANS AND PERMITS NEEDED FOR PRIVATE | | | UNDERGROUND FIRE LINE AND FIRE HYDRANTS. | | | | | | -PROVIDE AN EXTERIOR KEY SAFE TO ALLOW EMERGENCY | | | RESPONDERS NON-FORCIBLE ENTRY INTO THE BUILDING DURING | | | NON-BUSINESS HOURS. A KEY SAFE CAN BE ORDERED FROM | | | WWW.KNOXBOX.COM. | | | | | | -PROVIDE A KNOX KEY SWITCH TO ALLOW GATE ACCESS TO | | | EMERGENCY RESPONDERS. KEY SWITCH CAN BE ORDERED FROM | | | WWW.KNOXBOX.COM. | | | | | | -PER SECTION 10.12.1.2 (NFPA 1), PROVIDE BUILDING | | | ADDRESS VISIBLE FROM THE STREET. NUMBERS SHALL BE | | | ATTACHED TO THE BUILDING AND BE AT LEAST SIX-INCHES IN | | | HEIGHT WITH 1-INCH STROKE AND SHALL CONTRAST THE | | | BACKGROUND. | | | | | | -PER SECTION 8.3.2.4 | | | EACH NEW FIRE WALL, FIRE BARRIER, FIRE PARTITION, SMOKE | | | BARRIER, SMOKE PARTITION, OR ANY OTHER NEW WALL | | | REQUIRED TO HAVE | | | PROTECTED OPENINGS SHALL BE PERMANENTLY IDENTIFIED WITH | | | SIGNS OR | | | STENCILING ABOVE ANY DECORATIVE CEILING AND IN | | | CONCEALED SPACES | | | WITH THE WORDING, "FIRE AND SMOKE BARRIER PROTECT | | | ALL OPENINGS" OR SIMILAR LANGUAGE. SUCH SIGNS OR | | | STENCILING | | | SHALL BE IN 4 INCH HIGH LETTERS, ? INCH STROKE, AND NOT | | | MORE THAN 15 | | | FEET ON-CENTER. | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-10-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2016-10-21 |
Time |
12:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2016-10-21 |
Time |
12:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-09-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2016-09-12 |
Time |
14:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2016-09-12 |
Time |
14:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-09-12 15:23:37 | 2ND REVIEW: FBC 2014 | | | | | | GEORGE JOHNSON | | | PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6711 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | GAS COMMENTS: 2ND REQUEST | | | | | | 1. CLEARLY SHOW ALL CUT SECTIONS OF PIPE AND | | | CORRESPONDING LENGTHS PER FBC-2014 FUEL GAS, SECS. | | | 402.4.1, 402.4.2. | | | | | | 2. SHOW TYPE OF PIPING MATERIAL BEING INSTALLED ON | | | RISER , ALL PIPE SIZES, AND THE EHD NUMBER OF | | | CORRUGATED STAINLESS STEEL TUBING FOR EACH PIPE SIZE IF | | | BEING USED. WPB AMENDMENTS TO FBC SEC. 107.2.1. | | | | | | 3. SHOW PIPE SIZE DOWN STEAM OF REGULATORS. WPB | | | AMENDMENTS TO FBC SEC. 107.2.1. | | | | | | 4. SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR COMBUSTION AIR ON RANGE PER | | | THE FBC-2014 FUEL GAS CODE SEC. 304. | | | | | | 5. SUBMIT MANUFACTURER?S SPECIFICATION SHEETS FOR ALL | | | GAS EQUIPMENT TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS NFPA | | | 54, NFPA 58, AND FBC-2014 FUEL GAS SEC. 402.2 | | | | | | 6. PLEASE CLARIFY SYSTEM PRESSURE IT APPEARS TO BE A | | | 2LB SYSTEM BEING REDUCED DOWN TO .5LB AT EACH APPLIANCE | | | BY REGULATORS. THE TABLES YOU REFERENCE INDICATE .5LB | | | PLEASE INDICATE ON THE RISER THE PRESSURE IN EACH | | | SECTION OF THE SYSTEM. PER WPB AMEND TO FBC 107.2.1 | | | | | | 7. PROVIDE EMERGENCY SHUT OF VALVE ON GAS SUPPLY TO | | | RANGE | | | | | | DO TO PLANS BEING INCOMPLETE OR UNCLEAR, A | | | COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW CANNOT BE DONE AT THIS TIME, | | | THERE MAYBE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ON RESUBMITTAL OF | | | PLANS. | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY | | | RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. PLEASE, ADDITIONALLY, INSERT | | | CORRECTED PAGES INTO TO SUBMITTAL AND LEAVE THE | | | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-06-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2016-06-16 |
Time |
08:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2016-06-16 |
Time |
08:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-06-16 08:39:03 | 1ST REVIEW: FBC 2014 | | | | | | GEORGE JOHNSON | | | PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6711 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | GAS COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. CLEARLY SHOW ALL CUT SECTIONS OF PIPE AND | | | CORRESPONDING LENGTHS PER FBC-2014 FUEL GAS, SECS. | | | 402.4.1, 402.4.2. | | | | | | 2. SHOW TYPE OF PIPING MATERIAL BEING INSTALLED, ALL | | | PIPE SIZES, AND THE EHD NUMBER OF CORRUGATED STAINLESS | | | STEEL TUBING FOR EACH PIPE SIZE IF BEING USED. WPB | | | AMENDMENTS TO FBC SEC. 107.2.1. | | | | | | 3. SHOW PIPE SIZE DOWN STEAM OF REGULATORS. WPB | | | AMENDMENTS TO FBC SEC. 107.2.1. | | | | | | 4. SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR COMBUSTION AIR PER THE | | | FBC-2014 FUEL GAS CODE SEC. 304. | | | | | | 5. SUBMIT MANUFACTURER?S SPECIFICATION SHEETS FOR ALL | | | GAS EQUIPMENT TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS NFPA | | | 54, NFPA 58, AND FBC-2014 FUEL GAS SEC. 402.2 | | | | | | | | | | | | DO TO PLANS BEING INCOMPLETE OR UNCLEAR, A | | | COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW CANNOT BE DONE AT THIS TIME, | | | THERE MAYBE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ON RESUBMITTAL OF | | | PLANS. | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY | | | RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. PLEASE, ADDITIONALLY, INSERT | | | CORRECTED PAGES INTO TO SUBMITTAL AND LEAVE THE | | | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-10-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cpuell |
Date |
2016-10-28 |
Time |
11:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cpuell |
Date |
2016-10-18 |
Time |
11:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-09-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-09-16 |
Time |
10:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-08-10 |
Time |
10:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-08-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2016-08-01 |
Time |
16:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2016-05-25 |
Time |
13:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-04-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cpuell |
Date |
2016-04-11 |
Time |
08:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cpuell |
Date |
2016-02-08 |
Time |
08:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-10-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-10-25 |
Time |
14:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-10-25 |
Time |
14:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-10-25 14:51:07 | ROUTED STAMPED PLAN TO RECORDS | | | | | | MU-2016-023753-0000 | | | MU-2016-24011-0000 | | | MU-2016-024046-0000 | | | | | 2016-10-25 12:42:44 | GIVEN TO SHILL |
|
|
| Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-10-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-10-25 |
Time |
08:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-10-21 |
Time |
14:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-10-21 14:35:11 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | PROVIDE THE PLAN STAMPED BY THE COUNTY | | | THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED AT ANY TIME (DO NOT NEED TO WAIT | | | FOR THE REVIEW CYCLE TO BE COMPLETE) | | | | | | MU-2016-023753-0000 | | | MU-2016-24011-0000 | | | MU-2016-024046-0000 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-06-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-06-07 |
Time |
07:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-06-07 |
Time |
07:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-06-07 07:36:37 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT BY PALM BEACH COUNTY REQUIRED | | | PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE. THE PLANS ARE TO BE STAMPED | | | AND THE RECEIPT SHOWING THAT FEES WERE PAID IS TO BE | | | PROVIDED. THIS MAY BE DONE AT ANY POINT DURING THE PLAN | | | REVIEW PROCESS. | | | | | | FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT 561-233-5025. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-03-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-03-01 |
Time |
17:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-03-01 |
Time |
17:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-03-01 17:16:27 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT BY PALM BEACH COUNTY REQUIRED | | | PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE. THE PLANS ARE TO BE STAMPED | | | AND THE RECEIPT SHOWING THAT FEES WERE PAID IS TO BE | | | PROVIDED. THIS MAY BE DONE AT ANY POINT DURING THE PLAN | | | REVIEW PROCESS. | | | | | | FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT 561-233-5025. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-10-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ccole |
Date |
2016-10-27 |
Time |
15:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ccole |
Date |
2016-10-26 |
Time |
18:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-10-27 15:31:27 | MECHANICAL PROVISOS | | | 10/27/16 | | | | | | 1) THE UPLOADED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS FOR ANCHORING THE | | | CARRIER, MITSUBISHI, AND FIRST COMPANY EXTERIOR UNITS | | | MUST BEAR THE ORIGINAL SIGNATURES AND SEALS OF THE | | | ENGINEERS WHO PREPARED THE DOCUMENTS. | | | | | | 2) PROVIDE AHRI CERTIFICATES FOR THE THORUGH THE WALL | | | APARTMENT AC SYSTEMS. | | | | | | 3) SEPARATE PERMITS AND PLANS ARE REQUIRED FOR THE | | | KITCHEN HOOD AND FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM IN THE | | | CLUBHOUSE. | | | | | | CHRISTOPHER L. COLE | | | MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6719 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-08-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ccole |
Date |
2016-08-26 |
Time |
08:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ccole |
Date |
2016-08-25 |
Time |
09:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-08-26 09:57:25 | 3RD REVIEW FBC-2014 MECHANICAL | | | PERMIT #16020194 | | | 8/26/16 | | | | | | 1) THE REVISED AC COOLING AND HEATING CALCULATIONS ARE | | | MISSING THE A1, A1 COR, A2, AND A3 SYSTEMS. | | | | | | 2) THE ENERGY/GAUGE COMPLIANCE SUBMITTAL IS MISSING THE | | | DATA FOR THE MITSUBISHI SYSTEMS. | | | | | | 3) COMMENT #1 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW HAS NOT | | | COMPLETELY ADDRESSED. A) PROVIDE A REVISED FAN SCHEDULE | | | ON SHEET M-5.2 THAT SHOWS THE NEW, LARGER CAPACITY | | | GARAGE EXHAUST FANS. B) SHEETS M-2.1A & M-2.2A: THE | | | 6000 EXHAUST CFM'S SHOWN AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE | | | GARAGE FOR LEVELS 1 & 2 DO NOT MATCH WITH THE EXHAUST | | | CFMS SHOWN ON THE RISER DRAWING ON SHEET M-6.2. | | | | | | 4) COMMENT #15 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW HAS NOT BEEN | | | COMPLETELY ADDRESSED. A) DEMAND CONTROLLED VENTILATION | | | IS REQUIRED FOR THE THEATRE- PLEASE PLACE A NOTE ON THE | | | PLAN AND SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF CO2 SENSORS. B) SUBMIT | | | MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE SENSORS REVIEWED | | | WITH SIGNATURE BY THE EOR. THE SPECS SHALL PROVIDE | | | INSTRUCTIONS FOR INSTALLATION OF THE SENSORS | | | | | | INCLUDING PLACEMENT AND SPACING OF THE DEVICES. | | | | | | CHRISTOPHER L. COLE | | | MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6719 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-06-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ccole |
Date |
2016-06-09 |
Time |
07:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ccole |
Date |
2016-06-07 |
Time |
15:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-06-09 08:39:50 | 2ND REVIEW: FBC 2014 MECHANICAL, ENERGY CONSERVATION | | | PERMIT #16020194 | | | 6/9/16 | | | | | | 1) REFER TO SECTION 404.2: THE TOTAL 153900 SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE OF THE GARAGE LEVELS 1-7 WILL REQUIRE AN | | | EXHAUST VENTILATION SYSTEM CAPABLE OF PRODUCING A | | | MAXIMUM VENTILATION AIR FLOW RATE OF 115,470 CFMS AT | | | .75 CFMS PER SF. GEF-3 WHICH HAS A MAX RATE OF 20,000 | | | CFMS IS ADEQUATELY SIZED FOR THE 2ND LEVEL GARAGE IT IS | | | SERVICING, HOWEVER THE ROOF-MOUNTED GEF-1 & 2 DO NOT | | | HAVE THE CAPACITIES TO SERVICE THE REMAINING LEVELS. | | | | | | 2) REFER TO SECTION 501.4 AND CLARIFY HOW MAKEUP AIR | | | FOR THE GARAGE EXHAUST SYSTEMS IS BEING PROVIDED: THE | | | CONTROL DIAGRAM ON M-6.3 DEPICTS NORTH AND SOUTH | | | OUTSIDE AIR SHAFTS AND SPECIFES SUPPLY FANS IN THE | | | SEQUENCE NOTES, HOWEVER THESE SHAFTS AND SUPPLY FANS DO | | | NOT APPEAR TO BE SHOWN ON THE GARAGE MECHANICAL PLANS. | | | | | | 3) SHEETS M-6.3 AND M-2.1A & M-2.2A: THE CONTROLS | | | DIAGRAM SHOWS THE AMS AT BOTH NORTH AND SOUTH LOCATIONS | | | FOR GARAGE LEVELS 1 & 2, HOWEVER THEY ARE NOT SHOWN ON | | | THE MECHANICAL PLANS FOR THE THOSE LEVELS. | | | | | | 4) REFERENCE WAS MADE TO SECTION C403.2.9 FBC-14 ENERGY | | | CONSERVATION (COMMENT #18) WHICH REQUIRES COMMISSIONING | | | OF THE MECHANICAL SYSTEMS ON THE PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | PLEASE REVIEW SECTION C408 AND SUBMIT A COMMISSIONING | | | PLAN IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION C408.2.1. | | | | | | 5) THE SUBMITTED AC COOLING AND HEATING SUMMARY | | | CALCULATIONS FROM DTM TECH INC. MUST BE SIGNED AND | | | SEALED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD- SECTION C403.2.1. | | | | | | 6) SHEET M3.1A: THE REDCIRCULATION OF AIR FROM THE DOG | | | PARLOR IS PROHIBITED PER TABLE 403.3 FOOTNOTE B. PLEASE | | | REMOVE THE TRANSFER DUCT. | | | | | | 7) M3.1A: THE SUPPLY AIR STREAM IN THE ZOOM LOCKER ROOM | | | SHALL NOT CONTAIN MORE THAN 10% OF REIRCULATED AIR FROM | | | THE SPACE. IT APPEARS THAT THE 48X6 RETURN AIR GRILL | | | WILL ALLOW RECIRCULATION EXCEEDING THE ALLOWABLE LIMIT. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A CALCULATION TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | 8) AS PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | ASHRAE 62.1 AND TABLE 403.3, PROVIDE VENTILATION FOR | | | THE TELECOM AND STORAGE ROOMS. | | | | | | 9) AS PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | ASHRAE 62.1 AND TABLE 403.3, PROVIDE EXHAUST SYSTEMS | | | FOR THE TRASH ROOMS. | | | | | | 10) M-2.2C: REFER TO SECTION 501.3.1(2) AND INDICATE | | | ALL REQUIRED CLEARANCE DISTANCES FOR THE TWO EXHAUST | | | OUTLETS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING. AS | | | PREVIOUISLY NOTED, FL. PRODUCT APPROVALS AND/OR | | | MIAMI-DADE NOA'S MUST BE SUBMITTED FOR THE EXHAUST | | | OUTLET LOUVERS WITH APPROVAL SIGNATURE BY THE EOR. THE | | | LOUVERS SHALL ALSO COMPLY WITH AMCA STANDARD 550. | | | | | | 11) M-3.1A, 3.1B: REFER TO COMMENT #10 ABOVE AND SHOW | | | COMPLIANCE FOR ALL EXHAUST OUTLETS ON THE WEST SIDE, | | | AND ALSO SEE SECTION 401.4 AND PROVIDE CLEARANCE | | | DISTANCE MEASUREMENTS FOR THE OUTDOOR AIR INLETS FOR | | | AC-4, 4A, 5, 6, 7, & 8. | | | | | | 12) M3.2C: PER THE NARRATIVE RESPONSE, THE LOCATION OF | | | CU-8 IS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN, HOWEVER THIS PLAN SHEET IS | | | NOT IN THE UPLOADED PLAN SETS ON THE INDEX. | | | | | | 13) M-2.7A & 7B: AS PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED PROVIDE SIZING | | | CALCULATIONS FOR THE ELEVATOR HOISTWAY VENTS IN | | | COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 3004.3 FBC-14 BUILDING. | | | | | | 14) M-3.1B: IT APPEARS THAT NON-METALLIC FLEXIBLE DUCTS | | | ARE BEING USED FOR EXHAUST IN THE POOL BATHROOMS PLEASE | | | PROVIDE A MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATION SHEET INDICATING | | | THE DUCTS CAN BE USED FOR THIS PURPOSE. | | | | | | 15) M-3.1C: PLEASE INDICATE HOW DEMAND CONTROLLED | | | VENTILATION IS BEING CONTROLLED AND SHOW THE LOCATION | | | OF THE C02 SENSORS. | | | | | | 16) M-7.2: AS PREVIOUSLY NOTED IN THE 1ST REVIEW, NOA | | | #07-0509.09 FOR THE ROOF STAND IS EXPIRED. PLEASE | | | PROVIDE THE CORRECT NOA # ON THE PLAN, AND THE WIND | | | LOAD DESIGN CRITERIA FOR ALL EXTERIOR INSTALLATIONS | | | SHOWN ON THE PLAN. | | | | | | 17) PLEASE PROVIDE AN AIR DEVICE SCHEDULE INDICATING | | | MAKES, MODELS, AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL SUPPLY DIFFUSERS | | | AND RETURN GRILLS, AND ACCESSORIES. | | | | | | 18) PROVIDE CONDENSATE DISPOSAL PLANS AND DETAILS FOR | | | ALL AC SYSTEMS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. IF LOCATED IN THE | | | PLUMBING DRAWINGS AND RISER DIAGRAMS, PLEASE INDICATE | | | ON WHICH PLAN SHEETS. | | | | | | 19) M-4.1, 4.2, & 4.3: SUBMIT MANUFACTURER'S | | | SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE DRYERS AND KITCHEN EXHAUST | | | HOODS. THE DRYER EXHAUST DUCT RUNS FOR ALL UNITS EXCEED | | | THE ALLOWABLE 35' MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE BY SECTION | | | 504.6.4.1, PLEASE NOTE THE DUCT RUN CHART ON SHEET | | | M-4.3 DOES NOT INDICATE THE MANUFACTURER. | | | | | | 20) M-4.1, 4.2, & 4.3: THE O/A INTAKES ON MANY OF THE | | | UNITS APPEAR TO BE LOCATED IN PROXIMITY OF THE | | | CONDENSER EXHAUST GRILLS. REFER TO SECTION 401.4 AND | | | ADD CLEARANCE MEASUREMENTS TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | 21) M-4.2: THE BEDROOM RETURN TRANSFER FOR ALL UNITS ON | | | THIS SHEET APPEAR TO BE POINTING IN THE WRONG | | | DIRECTION- PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | | | 22) EACH UPLOADED WIND LOAD ENGINEERING DOCUMENT FOR | | | THE CARRIER, MITSUBISHI, FIRST COMPANY UNITS, AND THE | | | ROOF STANDS AND WALL BRACKETS HAVE SCANNED ENGINEER'S | | | SEALS- EACH MUST BE DIGITALLY SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE | | | ENGINEER WHO PREPARED THEM. THE DOCUMENTS MUST ALSO BE | | | APPROVAL WITH SIGNATURE BY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF | | | RECORD. | | | | | | CHRISTOPHER L. COLE | | | MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6719 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-02-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ccole |
Date |
2016-02-24 |
Time |
16:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ccole |
Date |
2016-02-23 |
Time |
12:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-02-24 16:51:43 | 1ST REVIEW: FBC 2014 MECHANICAL | | | PERMIT #16020194 | | | 2/23/16 | | | | | | 1) DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE FIFTH EDITION 2014 ENERGY | | | EFFICIENCY COMPLIANCE FORM SUBMITTAL AND THE AC PLANS | | | AND EQUIPMENT SCHEDULES: | | | A) COMPLIANCE FORM LISTS RTU'S 1-5 AT 338,000 BTUH | | | COOLING EACH AT 11.30 EER EACH, | | | -THE AC SCHEDULE INDICATES 322,130 BTUH COOLING AT 12.8 | | | EER. | | | B) FORM LISTS THE FITNESS CENTER SPLIT SYSTEM AT | | | 150,000 BTUH COOLING AT 12 EER, | | | - THE SCHEDULE INDICATES 120,000 BTUH COOLING AT 11.2 | | | EER | | | C) FORM LISTS THE OFFICE 136 AND 137 SPLIT SYSTEMS AT | | | 42,000 BTUH COOLING AT 14 SEER, | | | - THE SCHEDULE INDICATES TOTAL COOLING CAPACITY FOR | | | EACH AT 30,000 BTUH AT 14 SEER. | | | D) FORM LISTS THE THEATER SPLIT SYSTEM AT 23,000 BTUH | | | COOLING AT 16 SEER, | | | - THE SCHEDULE INDICATES 24,000 BTUH COOLING AT 16.5 | | | SEER. | | | E) TWO LEASING CENTER SPLIT SYSTEMS ARE INDICATED ON | | | THE SCHEDULE WITH CAPACITIES AND EFFICIENCY RATINGS | | | THAT DON'T MATCH THE SINGLE LEASING CENTER SYSTEM | | | LISTED ON THE COMPLIANCE FORM. | | | F) FORM LISTS AHU-5 AT 46,000/14 SEER, THE SCHEDULE | | | LISTS 30,000/14. | | | G) FORM LISTS RES LOBBY-N & S AT 12,000/14 SEER, | | | SCHEDULE LISTS 9,000/14.5 SEER. | | | H) FORM LISTS THE CLUBHOUSE FITNESS AT 90,000/12 EER, | | | THE SCHEDULE ON SHEET M-5.3 LISTS THRE FITNESS ROOM AT | | | 2.5TON/15 SEER. | | | I) FORM LISTS ST1 & ST2 SYSTEMS AT 12,000/14 SEER, THE | | | SCHEDULE LISTS RESIDENTIAL AC-1.2 AT 15,000/14 SEER. | | | J) THERE IS NO COMPLIANCE DATA LISTED ON THE ENERGY | | | FORM FOR RTU'S A & B SHOWN IN THE SCHEDULE ON M-5.3, | | | AND FOR THE DUCTLESS SYSTEMS AC-1- AC-13 SHOWN ON SHEET | | | M-5.1. | | | | | | 2) THE AC IDENTIFICATION LABELS FOR THE RESIDENTIAL | | | UNITS USED IN THE ENERGY AND AC COOLING AND HEATING | | | LOAD SUMMARIES SUBMITTALS DO NOT DIRECTLY CORRELATE | | | WITH THE LABELING SHOWN IN THE SCHEDULE ON SHEET M-5.1. | | | THE LOAD SUMMARIES ARE ALSO INDICATING EACH SYSTEM AS A | | | SINGLE ZONE HOWEVER EACH OF THESE SYSTEMS ARE SHOWN ON | | | THE PLANS TO BE LOCATED IN MULTIPLE DIRECTIONAL | | | ORIENTATIONS- PLEASE REFER TO SECTIONS C407.4.2- | | | C407.5.2.3 FBC-14 ENERGY CONSERVATION- | | | MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS. | | | RESIDENTIAL SPACES SHALL BE MODELED USING ONE THERMAL | | | BLOCK PER SPACE EXCEPT THAT THOSE FACING THE SAME | | | ORIENTATIONS ARE PERMITTED TO BE COMBINED INTO ONE | | | THERMAL BLOCK. CORNER UNITS AND UNITS WITH ROOF OR | | | FLOOR LOADS SHALL ONLY BE COMBINED WITH UNITS SHARING | | | THESE FEATURES. | | | AS STATED IN THE ABOVE CODE SECTIONS CALCULATIONS SHALL | | | BE DONE USING THERMAL BLOCKS AND ZONES. REVISE THE | | | CALCULATIONS ACCORDINGLY AND PROVIDE A THERMAL ZONE | | | DIAGRAM AND SCHEDULE TO ACCOMPANY THE CALCULATIONS. THE | | | SCHEDULE SHALL CLEARLY INDICATE WHICH SYSTEMS ARE IN | | | WHICH BLOCK OR ZONE, AND THE DIRECTIONAL ORIENTATIONS. | | | A) PLEASE NOTE THAT AC CALCULATIONS HAVE NOT BEEN | | | SUBMITTED FOR THE DUCTLESS SYSTEMS. | | | B) THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE FITNESS ROOM INDICATE 127.9 | | | MBH OR 10.7 TONS, HOWEVER THE SCHEDULE IS INDICATING | | | 2.5 TONS FOR FITNESS ROOM RTU-A ON SHEET M-5.3. | | | C) THE SUBMITTED AC SYSTEM SIZING SUMMARY SHEETS MUST | | | BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY A LICENSED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | | | PER SECTION C403.2.1 FBC-14 ENERGY CONSERVATION. | | | | | | 3) SHEET M-5.3, OUTSIDE AIR CALCULATIONS: PROVIDE | | | CALCULATIONS FOR THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS, THE CORRIDORS, | | | THE BRIDGE AREA, THE WORK ROOMS, AND THE DOG PARLOR PER | | | TABLE 403.3 FBC-14 MECHANICAL. | | | 4) PROVIDE EXHAUST VENTILATION CALCULATIONS FOR THE | | | TRASH ROOMS, RESIDENTIAL BATHROOMS, POOL BATHROOMS, | | | POOL EQUIPMENT ROOMS, MAINTENANCE ROOMS, ELECTRICAL | | | ROOMS, STORAGE ROOMS, PUMP ROOMS, DOG PARLOR, OFFICE | | | 136 & 137 & OFFICE AREA TOILET ROOMS, SERVICE COURT, | | | AND THE FITNESS CLUB ROOM. | | | 5) PROVIDE AIR BALANCE CALCULATIONS. | | | 6) PROVIDE EXHAUST VENTILATION CALCULATIONS FOR EACH | | | LEVEL OF THE GARAGE- REFER TO SECTION 404.2 FBC-14 | | | MECHANICAL. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE GROUND AND SECOND | | | LEVEL PLANS M-2.1A AND M-2.1A APPEAR TO INDICATE A | | | SUPPLY AIR FAN "GE-1A" HOWEVER I AM NOT SEEING ANY DATA | | | FOR THE FANS IN THE SCHEDULES, NOR ARE THESE FANS SHOWN | | | ON THE 3RD- 8TH LEVELS. | | | 7) GARAGE- ALL LEVELS: INDICATE HOW ALL THE FANS, AC | | | CONDENSERS, AND OTHER MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND | | | COMPONENTS WILL BE PROTECTED FROM VEHICLE DAMAGE- | | | SECTION 303.4 FBC-14 MECHANICAL | | | 8) SHEETS M-2.1A- M-2.6B: VENTILATION NOT SHOWN FOR THE | | | ELECTRICAL ROOMS, THE TELECOM ROOMS, AND THE STORAGE | | | ROOMS ON ANY OF THE MECHANICAL FLOOR PLANS FROM THE | | | GROUND LEVEL TO LEVEL 8. HOW WILL THESE ROOMS BE | | | VENTILATED. | | | 8) SHEET M-2.1A: IT APPEARS THAT THE AMS IS MISSING FOR | | | THE GARAGE EXHAUST FAN AT THE NORTH END OF THE GARAGE. | | | 9) SHEET M-2.1A: LABEL THE AC UNIT IN THE TRASH ROOM | | | AND PROVIDE AN EXHAUST VENTILATION SYSTEM- TABLE 6-4 | | | ASHRAE 62.1-2010. | | | 10) M-2.1A: PROVIDE AN EXHAUST VENTILATION SYSTEM FOR | | | THE ZOOM LOCKERS ROOM- TABLE 6-4 ASHRAE 62.1-2010. | | | 11) M-2.1A: INDICATE THE HEIGHT FROM THE GARAGE FLOOR | | | TO THE BOTTOM OF THE RF-1 FAN ON ALL GARAGE FLOOR | | | LEVELS- SECTION 304.6 FBC-14 MECHANICAL. | | | 12) M-2.1C: THE NOTE IN THE SERVICE COURT REFERENCES | | | SHEET M2.2 WHICH IS NOT INCLUDED WITH THE PLAN SETS. | | | 14) M-2.2A: IT APPEARS THAT THE AMS IS MISSING FOR THE | | | EXHAUST FAN AT THE NORTH END OF THE GARAGE. | | | 15) M-2.2C: REFER TO SECTION 501.3.1 FBC-14 MECHANICAL | | | AND PROVIDE CLEARANCES FOR THE EXHAUST TERMINATIONS ON | | | THE NORTH SIDE. PLEASE NOTE THAT A FLORIDA PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL OR MIAMI-DADE NOA FOR THE EXHAUST LOUVER MUST | | | BE SUBMITTED WITH A REVIEW AND APPROVAL SIGNATURE BY | | | THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD. A) INDICATE THE | | | REQUIRED CLEARANCES FOR THE GARAGE AIR INTAKE ON THE | | | NORTH SIDE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 401.4. B) AS | | | PREVIOUSLY NOTED, THE "GE-1A" TAG BY THE GARAGE INTAKE | | | GRILL APPEARS TO BE INDICATING A FAN, HOWEVER I AM NOT | | | SEEING THE FAN IN ANY OF THE HVAC SCHEDULES: PLEASE | | | CLARIFY. | | | 16) M-2.2C: THERE IS A NOTE BY THE NORTH TELECOM ROOM | | | REFERENCING SHEET M3.1 WHICH IS NOT INCLUDED WITH THE | | | PLAN SETS. | | | 17) M-2.4B: INDICATE HOW THE BRIDGE WILL BE VENTILATED | | | 18) REFER TO SECTION C403.2.9 FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION | | | AND VERIFY COMPLIANCE FOR ALL EXHAUST AND SUPPLY FANS | | | TO BE USED ON THE PROJECT. | | | | | | 19) M-2.6A: IT APPEARS THAT THE AMS EQUIPMENT IS | | | MISSING FOR THE GARAGE EXHAUST FANS AT THE NORTH AND | | | SOUTH ENDS. | | | 20) M-2.7A & 7B: SITE SPECIFIC WIND LOAD ENGINEERING IS | | | REQUIRED FOR ANCHORING AND TIE-DOWN OF ALL ROOF TOP | | | MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND COMPONENTS INCLUDING THE ROOF | | | AND EXTERIOR WALL-MOUNTED FANS, THE RTU'S, THE CU'S, | | | THE RTU CURBS AND CU STANDS, THE DUCTWORK AND DUCT | | | STANDS AND BRACKETS, ETC. . PLEASE NOTE THAT FLORIDA | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS AND/OR MIAMI-DADE NOA'S ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR THE CURBS AND STANDS WITH REVIEW AND APPROVAL | | | SIGNATURES FROM THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD- | | | SECTION 301.15 MECHANICAL. | | | 21) M-2.7A & 7B: PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION OF CU-8 | | | ON THE ROOF PLAN. | | | 22) M-2.7A & 7B: REFER TO SECTION 3004 FBC-14 | | | MECHANICAL AND PROVIDE DETAILS FOR THE REQUIRED | | | ELEVATOR HOISTWAY VENTING. SEE SECTION 3004.3 FOR | | | SIZING. | | | 23) M-3.1A: EXHAUST SYSTEMS ARE REQUIRED FOR THE DOG | | | PARLOR AND THE ZOOM LOCKERS ROOM- TABLE 403.3 FBC-14 | | | MECHANICAL. | | | 24) M-3.1A: PROVIDE DIMENSIONED ELEVATION VIEWS OF THE | | | O/A INTAKES FOR AC- 4, 4A, AND 5 TO VERIFY THE | | | LOCATIONS MEET THE REQUIRED CLEARANCES AS OUTLINED IN | | | SECTION 401.4 FBC-14 MECHANICAL. | | | 25) M-3.1A: SHUT OFF DAMPER CONTROLS FOR THE O/A | | | INTAKES ARE REQUIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION | | | C403.2.4.4 FBC-14 ENERGY CONSERVATION- INDICATE | | | COMPLIANCE ON THE PLAN. | | | 26) M-3.1A: PLEASE CLARIFY HOW O/A IS BEING SUPPLIED TO | | | AHU-9 SERVICING THE RESIDENTIAL LOBBY-N. | | | 27) M-3.1B: PROVIDE DIMENSIONED ELEVATION VIEWS OF THE | | | O/A INTAKES FOR AC- 6, 7, & 8 TO VERIFY THE LOCATIONS | | | MEET THE REQUIRED CLEARANCES AS OUTLINED IN SECTION | | | 401.4 FBC-14 MECHANICAL. | | | 28) M-3.1B: SHUT OFF DAMPER CONTROLS FOR THE O/A | | | INTAKES ARE REQUIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION | | | C403.2.4.4 FBC-14 ENERGY CONSERVATION- INDICATE | | | COMPLIANCE ON THE PLAN. | | | 29) M-3.1B: PROVIDE A CLEAR AIR DISTRIBUTION PLAN WITH | | | NOTES AND DETAILS FOR AHU-8. | | | 30) M-3.1B: REFER TO SECTION 501.3.1 FBC-14 MECHANICAL | | | AND INDICATE ALL REQUIRED CLEARANCE DISTANCE | | | MEASUREMENTS FOR THE TOILET AND POOL BATHROOM EXHAUST | | | FAN OUTLETS. CLARIFY IF CONDITIONED SUPPLY AIR OR | | | MAKE-UP AIR WILL BE PROVIDED TO THE POOL BATHROOMS. | | | 31) M-3.1C: THE CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | | | DIVISION REQUIRES A SEPARATE PERMIT AND PLANS FOR | | | COMMERCIAL KITCHEN HOOD AND EXHAUST SYSTEMS. PLEASE | | | INDICATE THAT THE NOTES AND DETAILS ON THE PLANS ARE | | | FOR REFERENCE ONLY. A) PROVIDE NOTES AND DETAILS ON THE | | | PLAN INDICATING THAT THE KITCHEN HOOD SUPPLY AIR INTAKE | | | AND EXHAUST FAN DISCHARGE ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH | | | SECTIONS 401.4 AND 506.3.13.3 FBC-14 MECHANICAL. | | | 32) M-3.1C: VERIFY REQUIRED CLEARANCES FOR THE AHU-2 | | | O/A INTAKE AT THE SOUTH WALL OF THE THEATER. | | | 33) M-3.1C: PROVIDE WIND LOAD TIE-DOWN ENGINEERING FOR | | | CU-2 & 3, & RTU- A & B- SECTION 301.15 FBC-14 | | | MECHANICAL. | | | 34) M-3.1C: THE 450 O/A CFM'S FOR RTU-B LISTED IN THE | | | AIR BALANCE SCHEDULE DOES NOT MATCH WITH THE 325 CFM'S | | | FOR THE CLUB LOUNGE LISTED IN THE O/A CALCULATIONS ON | | | SHEET M-5.3. | | | 35) M-3.1C: DEMAND CONTROLLED VENTILATION IS REQUIRED | | | FOR THE FITNESS ROOM IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION | | | C403.2.5.1 FBC-14 ENERGY CONSERVATION. INDICATE HOW | | | COMPLIANCE WITH THIS SECTION WILL BE MET (I.E.) THE USE | | | OF CO2 DETECTORS. | | | 36) M-3.1C: PROVIDE ENLARGED TYPICAL DRAWINGS OF THE | | | AHU'S IN THE CLOSETS INDICATING REQUIRED CLEARANCES, | | | CONDENSATE DISPOSAL DETAILS, CLOSET CONSTRUCTION AND | | | LOUVERED DOOR MATERIALS- REFER TO SECTION 602.1 FBC-14 | | | MECHANICAL AND C403.2.7.2 FBC-14 ENERGY CONSERVATION. | | | | | | 37) RESIDENTIAL PLANS M-4.1, M-4.1, & M-4.3: | | | A) PROVIDE AHRI CERTIFICATES FOR THE AC SYSTEMS. | | | B) REFER TO COMMENT #2 OF THIS REVIEW FOR AC LOAD | | | CALCULATION REQUIREMENTS. | | | C) PLACE A NOTE THAT THE BEDROOM DOORS WILL EACH HAVE A | | | 1" UNDERCUT PER SECTION 601.5 FBC-14 MECHANICAL. | | | D) REFER TO COMMENT #3 FOR O/A CALCULATIONS REQUIRED | | | FOR THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND SHOW COMPLIANCE. | | | E) PROVIDE SHUTOFF DAMPER CONTROLS FOR THE O/A INTAKES. | | | F) PROVIDE CLEARANCE DISTANCE MEASUREMENTS OR NOTES ON | | | THE PLAN INDICATING COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 401.4 | | | FBC-14 MECHANICAL. | | | G) INDICATE COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 401.5 FOR THE O/A | | | OPENING PROTECTION. | | | H) PROVIDE A PRODUCT APPROVAL OR NOA FOR THE O/A | | | LOUVER. | | | I) KITCHEN VENTILATION: SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH TABLE | | | 403.3 FOR REQUIRED EXHAUST RATE IN THE KITCHENS. IF | | | RANGE HOODS ARE TO BE USED, PROVIDE AN EQUIPMENT | | | SCHEDULE ON THE PLAN AND SUBMIT SPECIFICATIONS REVIEWED | | | AND APPROVED BY THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD. | | | J) INDICATE THE TOTAL RUN LENGTHS OF THE DRYER EXHAUST | | | RUNS AND SUBMIT MANUFACTURER?S SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE | | | DRYERS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | | | OF RECORD. | | | | | | 39) M-7.1: DETAIL 10- INDICATE THAT THE LOUVERED CLOSET | | | DOORS WILL BE NON-COMBUSTIBLE FOR ALL AC CLOSETS | | | INCLUDING THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS. | | | 40) M-7.2: PROVIDE FIRESTOPPING DETAILS FOR DUCTS | | | PENETRATING FIRE-RATED WALLS AND SHAFTS. | | | 41) M-7.2, DETAIL 5: THE NOA #07-0509.09 SPECIFIED IS | | | OUTDATED AND HAS BEEN SUPERSEDED. PLEASE PROVIDE A | | | CURRENT NOA #. | | | 42) M-7.2, DETAIL 5: THE ASCE 7-05 REFERENCED IN THE | | | DETAIL IS OUTDATED. ASCE 7-10 IS THE CURRENT STANDARD | | | IN EFFECT. | | | 43) PROVIDE REFRIGERANT PIPING RISER DRAWINGS FOR THE | | | AMENITY AC SYSTEMS 4-9, AND MANUFACTURER?S LINE LENGTH | | | SPECIFICATIONS AND LIMITATIONS. B) PROVIDE THE TYPE AND | | | SIZE OF REFRIGERANT PIPE INSULATION AND INDICATE HOW | | | THE INSULATION SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM UV AND | | | WEATHERING DEGRADATION. | | | 44) REFER TO SECTION C403.2.10 FBC-14 ENERGY | | | CONSERVATION AND PROVIDE EVIDENCE OF COMPLIANCE- | | | C403.2.10.1 ALLOWABLE FAN MOTOR HORSEPOWER. | | | EACH HVAC SYSTEM AT FAN SYSTEM DESIGN CONDITIONS SHALL | | | NOT EXCEED THE ALLOWABLE FAN SYSTEM MOTOR NAMEPLATE HP | | | (OPTION 1) OR FAN SYSTEM BHP (OPTION 2) AS SHOWN IN | | | TABLE C403.2.10.1(1). THIS INCLUDES SUPPLY FANS, | | | RETURN/RELIEF FANS, AND FAN-POWERED TERMINAL UNITS | | | ASSOCIATED WITH SYSTEMS PROVIDING HEATING OR COOLING | | | CAPABILITY. SINGLE ZONE VARIABLE-AIR-VOLUME SYSTEMS | | | SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CONSTANT VOLUME FAN POWER | | | LIMITATION. | | | EXCEPTION: THE FOLLOWING FAN SYSTEMS ARE EXEMPT FROM | | | ALLOWABLE FAN FLOOR HORSEPOWER REQUIREMENT. | | | 1. HOSPITAL, VIVARIUM AND LABORATORY SYSTEMS THAT | | | UTILIZE FLOW CONTROL DEVICES ON EXHAUST AND/OR RETURN | | | TO MAINTAIN SPACE PRESSURE RELATIONSHIPS NECESSARY FOR | | | OCCUPANT HEALTH AND SAFETY OR ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL | | | SHALL BE PERMITTED TO USE VARIABLE VOLUME FAN POWER | | | LIMITATION. | | | 2. INDIVIDUAL EXHAUST FANS WITH MOTOR NAMEPLATE | | | HORSEPOWER OF 1 HP OR LESS. | | | | | | CHRISTOPHER L. COLE | | | MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6719 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-10-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2016-10-21 |
Time |
12:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2016-10-21 |
Time |
12:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-09-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2016-09-12 |
Time |
13:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2016-09-12 |
Time |
13:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-09-12 14:05:14 | 3RDT REVIEW | | | | | | | | | | | | GEORGE JOHNSON | | | PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER LL | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | | | BUILDING DIVISION | | | 561-805-6711 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | PLUMBING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. SHT. A-10.6 PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC ACC. | | | 604.7 DISPENSERS. | | | TOILET PAPER DISPENSERS SHALL COMPLY WITH 309.4 AND | | | SHALL BE 7 INCHES (180 MM) MINIMUM AND 9 INCHES (230 | | | MM) MAXIMUM IN FRONT OF THE WATER CLOSET MEASURED TO | | | THE CENTERLINE OF THE DISPENSER. THE OUTLET OF THE | | | DISPENSER SHALL BE 15 INCHES (380 MM) MINIMUM AND 48 | | | INCHES (1220 MM) MAXIMUM ABOVE THE FINISH FLOOR AND | | | SHALL NOT BE LOCATED BEHIND GRAB BARS. DISPENSERS SHALL | | | NOT BE OF A TYPE THAT CONTROLS DELIVERY OR THAT DOES | | | NOT ALLOW CONTINUOUS PAPER FLOW. | | | | | | 2. THE KITCHEN SINK IN CH 103 SHALL DRAIN THRU GREASE | | | INTERCEPTOR. PER FBC PL 1003.1 | | | | | | 3. SHT.P2.1B ON THE OUTLET SIDE OF GREASE INTERCEPTOR A | | | ONE DIRECTIONAL CLEAN IS SHOWN PLEASE SHOW A TWO WAY | | | CLEAN OUT. ALSO DOWN STEAM OF THE CLEANOUT WE REQUIRE A | | | TEST PORT MIN SIZE IS 6IN. PER WPB UTIL. DEPT. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-06-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2016-06-16 |
Time |
08:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2016-06-06 |
Time |
16:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-06-15 16:09:58 | | | | 2ND REVIEW: FBC 2014 | | | | | | GEORGE JOHNSON | | | PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6711 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | FAIR HOUSING AND ACCESSIBILITY COMMENTS: | | | | | | PREVIOUS COMMENTS | | | #3. DID NOT COMPLY PLEASE SHOW THE MIN AND MAX | | | DIMINSIONS OF THE REINFORCEMENT FOR THE GRAB BARS | | | MEASURED FROM FINISHED FLOOR TO THE BOTTOM AND TOP OF | | | REINFORCEMENT. PER FHA DESIGN MANUAL REQUIREMENT 6 | | | | | | #8 DID NOT COMPLY PLEASE SHOW DEMINSIONS OF VANITY FROM | | | FRONT TO BACK NOT SIDE TO SIDE. PER FHA DESIGN MANUAL | | | REQUIREMENT 5 | | | | | | #10 DID NOT COMPLY PLEASE SHOW DEMINSION OF THE WING | | | WALL ON RIGHT SIDE OF TOILET FROM BACK OF TOILET TO THE | | | END OF THE WALL. PER FHA DESIGN MANUAL REQUIREMENT 7 | | | PART B | | | | | | NEW COMMENTS: | | | 1. SHT. A-5.1.5 SHOW THE CLEAR FLOOR SPACE FOR ALL | | | ACCESSIBLE FIXTURES IN EACH BATHROOM AND BREAKROOM SINK | | | IN LEASING OFFICE. PER FBC ACC. SEC. 305 | | | | | | 2. SHT. A-5.1.5 DETAIL A THE URINAL IS SHOWN AS | | | STANDARD PER ACCESSIBILITY LEGEND IT NEEDS TO BE SHOWN | | | AS ACCESSIBLE. PER FBC ACC. SEC 605 | | | | | | 3. THE BREAKROOM SINK IN LEASING OFFICE SHALL COMPLY | | | WITH FBC ACC. SEC. 606.3 HEIGHT. | | | LAVATORIES AND SINKS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH THE FRONT | | | OF THE HIGHER OF THE RIM OR COUNTER SURFACE 34 INCHES | | | (865 MM) MAXIMUM ABOVE THE FINISH FLOOR OR GROUND. | | | | | | PLUMBING COMMENTS: | | | | | | PREVIOUS COMMENTS: | | | | | | #11 DID NOT COMPLY SHT. P-6.2 DETAIL #2 STILL SHOWS | | | SUCTION AS 5IN EVERYTHING ELSE IS SHOWN AS 6IN. PLEASE | | | CLARIFY. PER WPB AMEND. TO FBC SEC.107.2.1 | | | | | | # 18 DID NOT COMPLY PROVIDE DETAIL WITH THE DEMISIONS | | | AND THE SQUARE FOOTAGE THAT IT IS SERVING FOR OVERFLOW | | | SCUPPERS. PER WPB AMEND. TO FBC SEC.107.2.1 | | | | | | #20 DID NOT COMPLY PLEASE PROVIDE DEMINSIONS OF STORM | | | SUMP PIT. PER WPB AMEND. TO FBC SEC.107.2.1 | | | | | | NEW COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. CUB HOUSE KITCHEN SINK AND MOP SINK ALONG WITH 3 | | | COMPARTMENT SINK SHALL DRAIN THROUGH GREASE | | | INTERCEPTOR. PER FBC PL SEC. 1003.1 WHERE REQUIRED. | | | INTERCEPTORS AND SEPARATORS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO | | | PREVENT THE DISCHARGE OF OIL, GREASE, SAND AND OTHER | | | SUBSTANCES HARMFUL OR HAZARDOUS TO THE PUBLIC SEWER, | | | THE PRIVATE SEWAGE SYSTEM OR THE SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT | | | OR PROCESSES. | | | | | | 2. SHT. P-2.1B MATCHLINE P-2.1B APPEARS TO BE INCORRECT | | | IT SHOULD BE P-2.1A PLEASE CLARIFY. PER WPB AMEND. TO | | | FBC SEC.107.2.1 | | | | | | | | | DO TO PLANS BEING INCOMPLETE OR UNCLEAR, A | | | COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW CANNOT BE DONE AT THIS TIME, | | | THERE MAYBE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ON RESUBMITTAL OF | | | PLANS. | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY | | | RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. PLEASE, ADDITIONALLY, INSERT | | | CORRECTED PAGES INTO TO SUBMITTAL AND LEAVE THE | | | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-03-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2016-03-11 |
Time |
09:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2016-02-27 |
Time |
07:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-03-10 14:28:40 | 1ST REVIEW: FBC 2014 | | | | | | GEORGE JOHNSON | | | PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6711 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | PLUMBING COMMENTS: | | | | | | (FHA) | | | | | | 1. SHT. A-10.4 UNIT C2 WHAT SPECIFICATION IS THE MASTER | | | BATH. | | | UNDER FAIR HOUSING ACT DESIGN MANUAL REQUIREMENT7 PART | | | B | | | 2. A CLEAR FLOOR SPACE WITH A PARALLEL APPROACH IS | | | REQUIRED FOR ALL SHOWERS. | | | UNDER FAIR HOUSING ACT DESIGN MANUAL REQUIREMENT7 PART | | | B | | | 3. SHOW HEIGHT OF REINFORCEMENT FOR GRAB BARS AND | | | SHOWER SEATS. | | | UNDER FAIR HOUSING ACT DESIGN MANUAL REQUIREMENT 6 | | | 4. SHT. A-10.4 UNIT C1 ALL SHOWERS SHALL HAVE PARALLEL | | | APPROACH CLEAR FLOOR SPACE SHOWERS IN TYPE A BATHROOM | | | CANNOT COMPLY. | | | UNDER FAIR HOUSING ACT DESIGN MANUAL REQUIREMENT7 PART | | | B | | | 5. SHT. A-10.4 UNIT C3 A MEANS OF PROVIDING KNEE SPACE | | | FOR LAVATORY'S WITH FRONT APPROACH CLEAR FLOOR SHALL BE | | | SHOWN ON PLANS. | | | UNDER FAIR HOUSING ACT DESIGN MANUAL REQUIREMENT7 PART | | | B | | | 6. SHT. A-10.1 UNITS S1-S2-A4 SHOW CLEAR FLOOR SPACE | | | FOR TUBS. | | | UNDER FAIR HOUSING ACT DESIGN MANUAL REQUIREMENT7 PART | | | B | | | 7. SHT. A10.1 UNIT A1-3 MIN. DIMENSION OF SHOWER DOOR | | | SHOULD BE 32IN. WIDE. | | | UNDER FAIR HOUSING ACT DESIGN MANUAL REQUIREMENT7 PART | | | B | | | 8. PLEASE INDICATE DEPTH OF LAVATORY VANITY MAX. OF | | | 24IN. . | | | UNDER FAIR HOUSING ACT DESIGN MANUAL REQUIREMENT5 | | | 9. SHT.A01.4 UNIT C1 CLEAR FLOOR SPACE FOR TUB SHALL BE | | | FLUSH WITH CONTROL WALL OF TUB. | | | UNDER FAIR HOUSING ACT DESIGN MANUAL REQUIREMENT7 PART | | | B | | | 10. SHT. A-10.4 UNIT C3 WING WALL NEXT TO TOILET SHALL | | | BE MAX OF 24IN. | | | UNDER FAIR HOUSING ACT DESIGN MANUAL REQUIREMENT7 PART | | | B | | | 11. PLEASE SHOW IN ALL KITCHENS A 3'-4" CLEARANCE | | | BETWEEN APPOSING CABINETS AND APPLIANCES. | | | UNDER FAIR HOUSING ACT DESIGN MANUAL REQUIREMENT7 PART | | | A | | | | | | (PLUMBING) | | | | | | 1. SHT.P-2.1A STACK B1 SHALL CONNECT TO BUILDING DRAIN | | | DOWN STREAN OF THE POOL BATHROOM GROUP MENS BATH. | | | PER FBC PL SEC. 912.1 | | | 2. PLEASE PROVIDE MANUFACTURE SPEC SHEETS AND SIZING | | | CALCULATIONS FOR GREASE INTERCEPTOR IN KITCHEN OF | | | CLUBHOUSE. | | | WPB AMEND. TO FBC SEC. 107.2.1.3 | | | 3. THERE IS NO FLOOR DRAIN IN TRASH SHUTE ROOMWHERE | | | WILL WATER DRAIN WHEN FLOOR IS DRAINED. | | | WPB AMEND. TO FBC SEC. 107.2.1 | | | 4. SHT. P-5.5 MOP SINK IN MAINTANCE ROOM IS NOT SHOWN | | | ON RISER DIAGRAM PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | WPB AMEND. TO FBC SEC. 107.2.1 | | | 5. SHT. P5.3 STACK C-C1-C2 SHOWS THE WC, SH. AND LAV | | | BRANCH FITTINGS ARE STACKED ON TOP OF EACH OTHER, IS | | | THIS THE WAY IT WILL BE PIPED UNDER THE SLAB, IT WILL | | | BE DEFACUIT TO DO IT THAT WAYPLEASE CLARIFY. | | | MAY BE UNDERSIZED. | | | PER FBC PL TABLE E201.1 | | | 6. P-5.7 PROVIDE SANITARY AND WATER RISER DIAGRAM | | | BATHROOMS IN OFFICES AND LEASING CENTER. | | | WPB AMEND. TO FBC SEC. 107.3.5.1.3 | | | 7. SHT. C-09 THE TOTAL DFU'S OF THE BUILDING SEWER | | | EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED ON THE EXISTING 8" CITY | | | SEWER LATERAL . | | | PER FBC PL TABLE 710.1(1) CONTACT MANUAL GONZALEZ AT | | | 561-494-1040 EX.1085 | | | 8. SHT. P-5.1 UNIT C1- C2 THE 1/2" COLD WATER LINE | | | SUPPLING THE MASTER BATH AND WASHING MACHINE MAY BE | | | UNDERSIZED. | | | PER FBC PL TABLE E201.1 | | | 9. SHT. P-5.1 UNIT A1-4 THE 1/2" COLD WATERLINE | | | SUPPLYING BOTH BATHROOMS MAY BE UNDERSIZED. | | | PER FBC PL TABLE E201.1 | | | 10. SHT. P-5.2 RISER #3 MAY BE UNDERSIZED. | | | PER FBC PL TABLE E201.1 | | | 11. SHT. P-6.2 DETAIL #2 SHOWS 5" SUCTION AND DISCHARGE | | | DETAIL #3 AND SHT.P-5.7 SHOWS 6" PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | WPB AMEND. TO FBC SEC. 107.2.1 | | | 12. PLEASE PROVIDE MANUFACTURE SPECS FOR DOMESTIC | | | PUMP,WATER HEATERS, SUMP PUMPS, OIL SPILL ALARM. | | | WPB AMEND. TO FBC SEC. 107.2.1 | | | 13. SHOW DRAINS FOR ELEVATOR SUMP PITS ON SANITARY | | | COLLECTION DIAGRAM. | | | WPB AMEND. TO FBC SEC. 107.2.1 | | | 14. SHT. P-2.7A+B THE MATCH LINES REFER TO P-2.6 A+B IS | | | THIS CORRECT P-2.7 ARE ROOF PLANS AND P-2.6 ARE EIGHT | | | FLOOR PLANS PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | WPB AMEND. TO FBC SEC. 107.2.1 | | | 15. SHT. P-2.7 B RD ON TOP OF STAIRWELL #1 IS NOT SHOWN | | | ON RISER DIAGRAM PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | WPB AMEND. TO FBC SEC. 107.2.1 | | | 16. SHT. P-2.7A WHERE IS THE RAIN WATER FROM ELEVATOR | | | SHAFT ROOF DRAIN TO. | | | WPB AMEND. TO FBC SEC. 107.2.1 | | | 17. SHOW OVERFLOW SCUPPERS ON ROOF PLAN WITH DETAILS. | | | WPB AMEND. TO FBC SEC. 107.2.1 | | | 18. PLEASE CLARIFY HOW ARE YOU DRAINING ROOF OF | | | CLUBHOUSE SHT. P-5.8 SHOWS STORM DRAIN FOR CLUB HOUSE | | | BUT NO RISER DIAGRAM. | | | WPB AMEND. TO FBC SEC. 107.2.1 | | | 19. PROVIDE DETAIL FOR STORM SUMP PIT NEXT TO BICYCLE | | | RACK. | | | WPB AMEND. TO FBC SEC. 107.2.1 | | | 20. SHT. A-5.1.5 SHOWS TOILET CLEARANCE OFF SIDE WALLAT | | | 18 MIN. IT SHOULD SHOW 16" MIN 18" MAX TO COMPLY WITH | | | FBC ACC. SEC. 604.2 ALL PUBLIC ACC. TOILETS SHALL | | | COMPLY. | | | 21. FLUSHING RING REQUIRED ON TRASH AND RECYCLING | | | SHUTE. PROVIDE DETAIL AND SHOW ON WATER RISER DIAGRAM. | | | WPB AMEND. TO FBC SEC. 107.2.1 | | | | | | (IRRIGATION) | | | | | | 1. SHT. LR-1 NOTER ON WATER SUPPLY FOR FOUNTAIN TO PUMP | | | VAULT CONNECT BETWEEN PVB AND MASTER VALVE IS THAT | | | CONNECTION BEING MADE ON THE DOWN STREAM SIDE OF PVB. | | | WPB AMEND. TO FBC SEC. 107.2.1 | | | 2. SHOW LOCATION OF RAIN SENSOR. | | | WPB AMEND. TO FBC SEC. 107.2.1 | | | 3. SHT. LR-1A CLUBHOUSE DECK IRRIGATION SHALL HAVE | | | BACKFLOW PROTECTION IF CONNECTED TO POTABLE WATER | | | SYSTEM AND BE SHOWN ON RISER DIAGRAM. | | | WPB AMEND. TO FBC SEC. 107.2.1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-09-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-09-09 |
Time |
15:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-09-09 |
Time |
15:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-09-09 15:38:53 | PRODUCT APPROVALS REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF RECORD WILL | | | BE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED WITH A ROOF PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. | | | | | | ROOF CONTRATOR IS TO INDICATE ASSEMBLY PROPOSED AND TO | | | INCLUDE ENHANCED FASTENING ENGINEERING IF APPLICABLE. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-06-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-06-29 |
Time |
13:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-06-29 |
Time |
13:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-03-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-03-11 |
Time |
14:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-03-11 |
Time |
14:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-03-11 14:14:51 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | ROOF NOAS FOR JM TPO SUBMMITTED; 14-0618.03, 13-0529.02 | | | | | | 1. ROOF PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED BUT THE | | | ASSEMBLY PROPOSED WAS NOT SELECTED AND ENGINEERING FOR | | | ENHANCED FASTENING (WOOD DECK) WAS NOT PROVIDED. IF | | | THIS INFORMATION IS NOT PROVIDED PRIOR TO PERMIT | | | ISSUANCE, THE INFORMATION WILL BE REQUIRED AT TIME OF | | | ROOF SUB PERMIT SUBMITTAL. AN "N" WILL BE ENTERED FOR | | | THE ROOF PLAN REVIEW. | | | | | | ROOF ASSEMBLIES SELECTED TO COMPLY WITH THE (VULT) | | | PRESSURES SPECIFIED ON SHEET S6-1. | | | | | | 2. SHEET S6-1, CLARIFY PURPOSE OF "ROOF MEMBRANE DESIGN | | | PRESSSURE" VS. "GROSS UPLIFT DESIGN PRESSURES." THE | | | DESIGN PRESSURES TO BE UTILIZED FOR THE TPO ROOF IS NOT | | | CLEAR. | | | | | | 3. SHEET S6-1, ROOF PRESSURES SPECIFIED USE ZONE 2 | | | PRESSURES FOR ZONE 3. IT APPEARS THAT THE STAIR ROOF, | | | ELEVATOR ROOF DO NOT INCLUDE A 3FT PARAPET, FBC 1609, | | | ASCE7 10 30.6-1 NOTE 7. | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-10-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-10-27 |
Time |
17:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-10-27 |
Time |
17:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-10-28 09:32:47 | 10/28/16 | | | PLUMBING PROVISO: | | | | | | PLUMBING PAGES P2.1C ,P2.2C, P2.3C, P2.5B, P2.6B, P4.1, | | | P4.2, P4.3, P5.1, P5.2, P5.3, P5.4, P5.5, P5.7, P5.8, | | | P5.9, P6.1, P6.3, P6.4. HAVE A WET STAMP BY ONE | | | ENGINEER AND A DIGITAL STAMP BY A DIFFERENT ENGINEER. | | | PLEASE RESUBMIT THESE PAGES WITH A SINGLE ENGINEER. | | | | | | GEORGE JOHNSON | | | PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER LL | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | | | BUILDING DIVISION | | | 561-805-6711 | | | [email protected] | | | | | 2016-10-27 17:23:10 | PROVISO | | | | | | PLUMBING PAGES SIGNATURE DOCUMENT REQUIRED | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-10-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-10-27 |
Time |
16:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-10-27 |
Time |
16:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-10-27 17:22:28 | SOME PLUMBING SHEETS WERE PREPARED BY ONE ENGINEER AND | | | DIGITALLY SIGNED AND SEALED BY A DIFFERENT ENGINEER. | | | | | | | | 2016-10-27 15:15:52 | DIGITAL SIGNATURES FOR MECHANICAL PLANS AND | | | CALCULATIONS VERIFIED/CC | | | 10/27/2016 | | 2016-10-21 14:38:48 | 10/21/16 3RD BUILDING REVIEW, SIGNATURE / SEAL | | | VERIFICATION | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED: | | | | | | 9/9/16, 6/7/16 VERIFIED A & S SHEET DIGITAL SIGNATURES, | | | 2ND & 3RD REVIEW & BUILDING SUBMITTALS (SH) | | | | | | 9/9/16 DIGITAL SIGNATURE ON STRUCTURAL CALCS VERIFIED | | | ORIGINAL SIGNED & SEALED SOILS REPORT WAS PROVIDED FOR | | | PERMIT 16020199 (VIBROFLOTATION PERMIT) | | | DIGITAL SIGNATURES ON EACH SHEET (S, LS, A, GA) OK | | | ORIGINAL SURVEY NOT REQUIRED AS IT IS NOW SUPERSEDED BY | | | REPLAT RECORDED BOOK 122, PAGES 16-17. | | | | | | | | 2016-06-09 12:52:03 | 6/9/16 | | | CCOLE | | | | | | EACH UPLOADED WIND LOAD ENGINEERING DOCUMENT FOR THE | | | CARRIER, MITSUBISHI, FIRST COMPANY UNITS, AND FOR THE | | | ROOF STANDS AND WALL BRACKETS HAVE SCANNED ENGINEER'S | | | SEALS- EACH MUST BE DIGITALLY SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE | | | ENGINEER WHO PREPARED THEM. THE DOCUMENTS MUST ALSO BE | | | APPROVED WITH SIGNATURE BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. | | 2016-06-07 07:23:53 | 9/9/2016 FAILED | | | | | | 1. ENERGY CALCS AND SOME MECHANICAL PAGES (FOR | | | EXAMPLES, SEE SHEETS M2.6B, M2.3B, CHECK ALL) ARE | | | PREPARED BY ALEJANDRO FRANYIE, BUT IS DIGITALLY SIGNED | | | AND SEALED BY VIVIANA FRANYIE. | | | 2. SEE ALSO OTHER REVIEWER('S) LIST(S). | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED: | | | | | | 9/9/16, 6/7/16 VERIFIED A & S SHEET DIGITAL SIGNATURES, | | | 2ND SUBMITTAL & 3RD SUBMITTALS (SH) | | | | | | 9/9/16 DIGITAL SIGNATURE ON STRUCTURAL CALCS VERIFIED | | | ORIGINAL SIGNED & SEALED SOILS REPORT WAS PROVIDED FOR | | | PERMIT 16020199 (VIBROFLOTATION PERMIT) | | | DIGITAL SIGNATURES ON EACH SHEET (S, LS, A, GA) OK | | | ORIGINAL SURVEY NOT REQUIRED AS IT IS NOW SUPERSEDED BY | | | REPLAT RECORDED BOOK 122, PAGES 16-17. | | | | | | 3/16 ALL TITLE BLOCKS CHECKED, LICENSES VERIFIED | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-03-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-03-16 |
Time |
13:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-03-16 |
Time |
13:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-03-16 12:41:54 | 3/16 ALL TITLE BLOCKS CHECKED, LICENSES VERIFIED | | | DIGITAL SIGNATURE OR BACKUP DOCUMENTS REQUIRED FOR | | | SOILS REPORT, SURVEY, STRUCTURAL CALCS | | | SEE BUILDING COMMENT REGARDING SOILS REPORT | | | DIGITAL SIGNATURES ON EACH SHEET WILL BE REVIEWED PRIOR | | | TO PERMIT ISSUANCE | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
THRESHOLD |
THRESHOLD INSPECTOR DOCUMENTS |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-09-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-09-16 |
Time |
06:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-08-22 |
Time |
14:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-09-16 06:35:33 | 9/16 OK PER KC | | | | | 2016-08-22 14:55:44 | 8/22 ALL DOCUMENTS RECEIVED AND COMPLETE; ROUTED TO KEN | | | CONRAD DESK FOR APPROVAL | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
THRESHOLD |
THRESHOLD INSPECTOR DOCUMENTS |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-06-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-06-28 |
Time |
14:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-06-28 |
Time |
14:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-06-06 16:37:34 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | 1. A RESUME FOR ENRIQUE XAVIER BURBANO WAS SUBMITTED, | | | BUT THIS INSPECTOR HAS NOT SIGNED THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR | | | AGREEMENT. | | | | | | 2. A RESUME FOR THE CONTRACTOR (ALLIANCE RESIDENTIAL | | | BUILDERS) HAS NOT BEEN SUBMITTED. | | | | | | AFTER ALL DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED, THE PACKAGE | | | WILL BE FORWARDED TO KEN CONRAD FOR APPROVAL. THESE | | | DOCUMENTS MAY BE SENT VIA EMAIL. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
THRESHOLD |
THRESHOLD INSPECTOR DOCUMENTS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-03-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-03-01 |
Time |
17:13 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-02-29 |
Time |
18:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-03-01 17:13:38 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | PLAN REVIEW IN PROGRESS | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | SI AGREEMENT AND POLICY SENT TO [email protected] | | | VIA EMAIL ON 3/1/16 | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-10-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aaponte |
Date |
2016-10-26 |
Time |
09:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
2016-10-26 |
Time |
09:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-10-26 09:55:23 | PROVISO: 1. BEFORE FINAL CO A SIDEWALK ACCESS EASEMENT | | | WILL BE REQUIRED ALONG QUADRILLE BOULEVARD. | | | 2. BEFORE FINAL CO A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WILL BE | | | REQUIRED FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF ANY LANDSCAPE, | | | IRRIGATION, TREE GRATES AND SPECIALY PAVERS INSTALLED | | | WITHIN THE ROW. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-09-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aaponte |
Date |
2016-09-16 |
Time |
08:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
2016-09-16 |
Time |
08:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-09-16 09:25:54 | 1. REPLAT- DONE. | | | 2. BEFORE FINAL CO A SIDEWALK ACCESS EASEMENT WILL BE | | | REQUIRED ALONG QUADRILLE BOULEVARD. | | | 3. BEFORE FINAL CO A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WILL BE | | | REQUIRED FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF ANY LANDSCAPE, | | | IRRIGATION, TREE GRATES AND SPECIALY PAVERS INSTALLED | | | WITHIN THE ROW. | | | 4. NOT SAFISFIED- SECTION AA ON SHEET C-6 SHOWS THE | | | CROSS SLOPE BUT DOES NOT CONFIRM THE SIDEWALK ELEVATION | | | IS MAINTAINED AS IT CROSSES DRIVEWAY AREA. STAFF | | | SENDING E-MAIL WITH FURTHER EXPLANATION.- PLEASE | | | CONFIRM THAT ANY VEHICULAR ENTRANCE IS DESIGNED TO HAVE | | | THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING AREA AT THE SAME LEVEL OF THE | | | ADJACENT SIDEWALK.PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS WITH SECTION. | | | 5. DONE-PLEASE CONSIDER THE PROPOSED DESIGN FOR THE | | | PUBLIC OPEN SPACE TO LOCATE THE YARD DRAIN | | | LINESINDICATED IN CIVIL DRAWINGS. | | | 6.DONE- ANY ABOVE GROUND UTILITY EQUIPMENT SHALL BE | | | LOCATED AWAY FROM PUBLIC VIEW AND SCREENED WITH | | | VEGETATION. | | | 7. NOT-SATISFIED - PLEASE PROVIDE PHOTOMETRICS OF ALL | | | THE AREAS OUTSIDE THE BUILDING, INCLUDING THE SIDEWALK | | | TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH THE 0.6 FOOTCANDLE AT1 FOOT | | | ABOVE THE SIDEWALK AT THEBACK OF CURB LINE (SEC | | | 94-113(B)). | | | 8. DONE- THE REMOVAL OF THE WINDOWS ABOVE THE GARAGE | | | ENTRANCE IMPACTS THE APPEARANCE OF VEHICULAR ENTRANCE. | | | THE DOUBLE HEIGHT OPENING WAS ORIGINALLY MITIGATED BY | | | THE WINDOWS. PLEASE PROVIDE AN ALTERNATIVE TO MINIMIZE | | | THE VISUAL IMPACT OF THE GARAGE ENTRANCE. A DIFFERENT | | | DECORATIVE ELEMENT CAN BE PROVIDED AT THE FACADE LINE | | | TO REDUCE THE HEIGHT OF THE GARAGE OPENING TO THE | | | MINIMUM CLEARANCE NEEDED FOR VEHICULAR ACCESS. | | | 9. DONE-PLEASE INDICATE IF THE PROPOSED TENANT STORAGE | | | HAS AC AND IT IS FULLY ENCLOSED (SEE SEC 94-109 | | | DEFINITION OF GROSS BUILDING AREA). | | | 10. DONE- PARKING PAINTING DETAIL FOR ON-STREET PARKING | | | AND ON-SITE PARKING SHALL MEET CITY'S PAINTING DETAIL | | | INCLUDED IN SEC 94-485. | | | 11. DONE-PLEASE ADJUST ALL DRAWINGS FOR CONSISTENCY | | | WITH REVISED OPEN SPACE DESIGN. | | | 12. DONE-PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM | | | COMPLIANCE WITH COVERED AREAS FOR GARGARE ROOF LEVEL. | | | 13. PLEASE SUBMIT A RESPONSE LETTER EXPLAINING HOW THE | | | COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | 14. DONE-A SEPARATE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PERMIT IS | | | REQUIRED. PLEASE SUBMIT SEPARATE APPLICATION FOR | | | REVIEW. | | | FOR ADDIITONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT ANA MARIA | | | APONTE AT 561-822-1439. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-07-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aaponte |
Date |
2016-07-29 |
Time |
11:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
2016-07-29 |
Time |
11:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-07-29 13:10:59 | 1. REPLAT- DONE. | | | 2. A SIDEWALK ACCESS EASEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED ALONG | | | QUADRILLE BOULEVARD. | | | 3. A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE | | | MAINTENANCE OF ANY LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, TREE GRATES | | | AND SPECIALY PAVERS INSTALLED WITHIN THE ROW. | | | 4. PLEASE CONFIRM THAT ANY VEHICULAR ENTRANCE IS | | | DESIGNED TO HAVE THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING AREA AT THE | | | SAME LEVEL OF THE ADJACENT SIDEWALK.PLEASE PROVIDE | | | DETAILS WITH SECTION. | | | 5. DONE-PLEASE CONSIDER THE PROPOSED DESIGN FOR THE | | | PUBLIC OPEN SPACE TO LOCATE THE YARD DRAIN | | | LINESINDICATED IN CIVIL DRAWINGS. | | | 6. ANY ABOVE GROUND UTILITY EQUIPMENT SHALL BE LOCATED | | | AWAY FROM PUBLIC VIEW AND SCREENED WITH VEGETATION. | | | 7. PLEASE PROVIDE PHOTOMETRICS OF ALL THE AREAS OUTSIDE | | | THE BUILDING, INCLUDING THE SIDEWALK TO CONFIRM | | | COMPLIANCE WITH THE 0.6 FOOTCANDLE AT1 FOOT ABOVE THE | | | SIDEWALK AT THEBACK OF CURB LINE (SEC 94-113(B)). | | | 8. DONE- THE REMOVAL OF THE WINDOWS ABOVE THE GARAGE | | | ENTRANCE IMPACTS THE APPEARANCE OF VEHICULAR ENTRANCE. | | | THE DOUBLE HEIGHT OPENING WAS ORIGINALLY MITIGATED BY | | | THE WINDOWS. PLEASE PROVIDE AN ALTERNATIVE TO MINIMIZE | | | THE VISUAL IMPACT OF THE GARAGE ENTRANCE. A DIFFERENT | | | DECORATIVE ELEMENT CAN BE PROVIDED AT THE FACADE LINE | | | TO REDUCE THE HEIGHT OF THE GARAGE OPENING TO THE | | | MINIMUM CLEARANCE NEEDED FOR VEHICULAR ACCESS. | | | 9. PLEASE INDICATE IF THE PROPOSED TENANT STORAGE HAS | | | AC AND IT IS FULLY ENCLOSED (SEE SEC 94-109 DEFINITION | | | OF GROSS BUILDING AREA). | | | 10. PARKING PAINTING DETAIL FOR ON-STREET PARKING AND | | | ON-SITE PARKING SHALL MEET CITY'S PAINTING DETAIL | | | INCLUDED IN SEC 94-485. | | | 11. PLEASE ADJUST ALL DRAWINGS FOR CONSISTENCY WITH | | | REVISED OPEN SPACE DESIGN. | | | 12. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE | | | WITH COVERED AREAS FOR GARGARE ROOF LEVEL. | | | 13. PLEASE SUBMIT A RESPONSE LETTER EXPLAINING HOW THE | | | COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | 14. A SEPARATE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PERMIT IS | | | REQUIRED. PLEASE SUBMIT SEPARATE APPLICATION FOR | | | REVIEW. | | | FOR ADDIITONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT ANA MARIA | | | APONTE AT 561-822-1439. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-04-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aaponte |
Date |
2016-04-08 |
Time |
16:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
2016-04-01 |
Time |
11:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-04-01 11:43:37 | 1.PROPERTY RE-PLAT IS REQUIRED. ALLEY ABANDONMENT | | | PROCESS NEEDS COMPLETION (PAYMENT AND RECORDING) TO | | | PROCEED WITH THE RE-PLAT. RESULTING SITE AREA IS | | | 117,949SF (2.7 ACRE) ACCORDING TO RE-PLAT DOCUMENTATION | | | SUBMITTED NOV 18, 2015. PLEASE REVIEW AND CONFIRM | | | INFORMATION. | | | 2. A SIDEWALK ACCESS EASEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED ALONG | | | QUADRILLE BOULEVARD. | | | 3. A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE | | | MAINTENANCE OF ANY LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, TREE GRATES | | | AND SPECIALY PAVERS INSTALLED WITHIN THE ROW. | | | 4. PLEASE CONFIRM THAT ANY VEHICULAR ENTRANCE IS | | | DESIGNED TO HAVE THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING AREA AT THE | | | SAME LEVEL OF THE ADJACENT SIDEWALK. | | | 5. PLEASE CONSIDER THE PROPOSED DESIGN FOR THE PUBLIC | | | OPEN SPACE TO LOCATE THE YARD DRAIN LINESINDICATED IN | | | CIVIL DRAWINGS. | | | 6. ANY ABOVE GROUND UTILITY EQUIPMENT SHALL BE LOCATED | | | AWAY FROM PUBLIC VIEW AND SCREENED WITH VEGETATION. | | | 7. PLEASE PROVIDE PHOTOMETRICS OF ALL THE AREAS OUTSIDE | | | THE BUILDING, INCLUDING THE SIDEWALK TO CONFIRM | | | COMPLIANCE WITH THE 0.6 FOOTCANDLE AT1 FOOT ABOVE THE | | | SIDEWALK AT THEBACK OF CURB LINE (SEC 94-113(B)). | | | 8. THE REMOVAL OF THE WINDOWS ABOVE THE GARAGE ENTRANCE | | | IMPACTS THE APPEARANCE OF VEHICULAR ENTRANCE. THE | | | DOUBLE HEIGHT OPENING WAS ORIGINALLY MITIGATED BY THE | | | WINDOWS. PLEASE PROVIDE AN ALTERNATIVE TO MINIMIZE THE | | | VISUAL IMPACT OF THE GARAGE ENTRANCE. A DIFFERENT | | | DECORATIVE ELEMENT CAN BE PROVIDED AT THE FACADE LINE | | | TO REDUCE THE HEIGHT OF THE GARAGE OPENING TO THE | | | MINIMUM CLEARANCE NEEDED FOR VEHICULAR ACCESS. | | | 9. PLEASE INDICATE IF THE PROPOSED TENANT STORAGE HAS | | | AC AND IT IS FULLY ENCLOSED (SEE SEC 94-109 DEFINITION | | | OF GROSS BUILDING AREA). | | | | | | FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT ANA MARIA | | | APONTE AT 561-822-1439. | | | | | | | | 2016-02-16 16:16:28 | 2/16/16 |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |