Plan Review Details - Permit 15120647
Plan Review Stops For Permit 15120647
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2016-02-21 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2016-02-21 Time 11:29 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date 2016-02-21 Time 10:31 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2016-01-06 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2016-01-06 Time 14:02 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date 2016-01-06 Time 10:28 Sent To  
Notes
2016-01-06 14:02:31BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
 W. P. B. PERMIT: 15120647
 ADD: 222 LAKEVIEW AVE. PH 100
 CONT: TBD
 TEL: 561-373-3902 KARI
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
 2014 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W 2014 WEST PALM BEACH
 AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1,
 ADMINISTRATION
  
 2014 EXISTING BUILDING CODE LEVEL II 701.3 COMPLIANCE.
 ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, SYSTEMS, AND
 SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING.
  
  
 1ST REVIEW
 DATE: WED. JAN. 06/2016
 ACTION: DENIED
  
 1) SHEET S01.00 STRUCTURAL NOTES PROVIDE A PARTIAL WIND
 DESIGN CRITERIA, MISSING ARE;
  
 1A) MEAN ROOF HEIGHT, NEGATIVE PRESSURES ARE TAKEN AT
 THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT 2014 FBC-B TABLE 1609.7(2).
  
 1B) THE PRESSURES PROVIDED +41.2/ -45.1 DOES NOT
 PROVIDE AT WHAT SQUARE FEET THEY REPRESENT, 10 SQ. FT.,
 20 SQ. FT. 50 SQ. FT. OR 100 SQ. FT.? 107.2.1.3
 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED.
  
 2) SHEET S01.00 LIST THE MIAMI-DADE NOA?S 11-0915.06
 (WINDOW) & 11-1013.03 (DOOR) AS THE NEW COMPONENTS &
 CLADDING THE LIMITATION ON THE FRAME HEIGHT IS 120
 INCHES IN HEIGHT AND UNIT WIDTH D.L.O. NOT TO EXCEED 48
 INCHES. SHEET S01.01 THE OVERALL HEIGHT IS 12 FOOT 4
 INCHES. PLEASE PROVIDE HOW CODE COMPLIANCE WILL BE
 ACHIEVED IN MEETING THE ASSOCIATED WIND PRESSURES AND
 LIMITATIONS OF THE LISTED PRODUCT APPROVAL.
  
 3) PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLIANCE WITH 2014 FBC-B 1609.1.2
 PROTECTION OF OPENINGS, 1609.6.4.4.1 COMPONENTS &
 CLADDING.
 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS RULE 9N-3 NOV.
 01/ 2010 (31) SUB-CATEGORY OF PRODUCTS OR CONSTRUCTION
 SYSTEMS THAT WILL REQUIRE PRODUCT APPROVALS:
 (31)(A) EXTERIOR DOORS. SUBMITTED A FLORIDA APPROVAL
 WITH PRESSURE GOOD FOR +/- 50 PSF/ NOT REVIEWED BY THE
 DESIGNER OF RECORD.
 (B) WINDOWS & MULLIONS.
  
 SUBMIT (2) COPIES OF THE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE
 COMPONENTS AND CLADDING LISTED ABOVE.
  
 4) SHEET A8.01 DETAILS 5 & 7 ARE CUT SECTIONS THROUGH
 THE EXTERIOR WALL AT THE ATM AND FUTURE ATM. SHEET
 S02.00 ALSO HAS A DETAIL THROUGH THIS SECTION WALL OF
 WALL. BOTH WALL SECTIONS INDICATE THE WALL FINISH IS TO
 BE ARCHITECTURAL STONE TO MATCH EXISTING BUT NEITHER
 PROVIDES FOR THE SHEATHING OF THE WALL,
 NOR THE ANCHORING OF STONE VENEER IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 1405.7.
  
 5) THE PLANS FAIL TO SHOW HOW THE ATM WILL BE ANCHORED
 IN PLACE TO MEET THE WIND PRESSURES FOR THIS LOCATION,
 MAY REQUIRE A PRODUCT APPROVAL OR ENGINEERING FOR THE
 ANCHORING OF THE UNIT. 1609.4.4.1.1.
 6) THE ATM MACHINE WILL NEED TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH
 THE 2014 FBC-ACCESSIBILITY CODE 707.1-8.
  
 7) WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION
 & REMOVE ANY VOIDED SHEETS & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS
 NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL
 REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE
 REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION
 PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO
 EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED
 COOPERATION.
  
 JAMES A. WITMER CBO
 SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 TEL: 561-805-6715
 FAX: 561-805-6676
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2016-03-15 Cont ID  
Sent By rlecky Date 2016-03-15 Time 12:20 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rlecky Date 2016-03-15 Time 11:09 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2016-02-18 Cont ID  
Sent By rlecky Date 2016-02-18 Time 13:27 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rlecky Date 2016-02-18 Time 12:10 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2016-01-29 Cont ID  
Sent By rlecky Date 2016-01-29 Time 13:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rlecky Date 2016-01-29 Time 10:38 Sent To  
Notes
2016-01-29 13:45:1815120647
 222 LAKEVIEW AVE. # 100
 COMMERCIAL RENOVATION
  
 PLEASE REVISE THE PLANS IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS.
  
 TRANSFORMER PRIMARY AND SECONDARY CONDUCTORS FEEDING
 PANELBOARDS ?IG? AND ?MDPB? ARE UNDERSIZED. INCREASE
 THEIR SIZES FOR CONTINUIOUS LOADING ,APPLY THE DERATION
 REQUIRED FOR MORE THAN THREE IN A CONDUIT AND VERIFY
 THE FEEDERS HAVE AN AMPACITY EQUAL TO THE AMPACITY OF
 THE SECONDAY PANELS. NEC 215.2 (A)(1), 240.21(C)(2)(1),
 310.15 (B)(2)(A), 408.36
 PROVIDE A SAFETY LABELING SCHEDULE FOR FLASH PROTECTION
 FOR THE SERVICE, PANEL BOARDS AND MAIN DISCONNECTING
 MEANS. NEC 110.16, 110.22
 PROVIDE GFCI PROTECTION FOR GENERAL PURPOSE RECEPTACLES
 IN THE ELECTRICAL ROOM. NEC 210.8
 PROVIDE GFCI PROTECTION FOR GENERAL PURPOSE RECEPTACLES
 ON THE ROOF. NEC 210.8
 PROVIDE GFCI PROTECTION FOR CONTER TOP RECEPTACLES NEAR
 THE SINK. NEC 210.8
 PROVIDE AN ENGINEERED MOUNTING DETAIL FOR HANGING THE
 TRANSFOMERS. FBC 1604.1
 PROVIDE A DIMENSIONED DETAIL FOR THE ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT
 ROOM SHOWING ALL SAFETY CLEARANCES AND HEAD ROOM. NEC
 110.26
  
 ROBERT LECKY
 ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER
  
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2016-02-18 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 2016-02-18 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 2016-02-18 Time 10:48 Sent To  
Notes
2016-02-18 11:04:56THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS RE-POSTED FOR 2ND REVIEW.
  
 PLEASE CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING AS PROVISO:
  
 THESE PROVISO COMMENTS WILL BE VERIFIED AND CONFIRMED
 AT THE TIME OF FIRE INSPECTION. FAILURE TO FOLLOW THESE
 PROVISO COMMENTS WILL RESULT IN A FAILED FIRE
 INSPECTION.
  
 1. SHEET A 12.10 - ALL DOOR LOCKS AND HARDWARE SHALL
 COMPLY WITH NFPA 101, CHAPTER 7, INCLUDING BUT NOT
 LIMITED TO,
  
 7.2.1.5.5.1 EXTERIOR DOOR ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE PERMITTED
 TO HAVE KEY-OPERATED LOCKS FROM THE EGRESS SIDE,
 PROVIDED THAT ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA ARE MET.
 (1) THIS ALTERNATIVE IS PERMITTED IN CHAPTERS 11
 THROUGH 43 FOR THE SPECIFIC OCCUPANCY. ( IT IS
 PERMITTED UNDER CHAPTER 39, EXISTING BUSINESS
 OCCUPANCY)
 (2) A READILY VISIBLE, DURABLE SIGN IN LETTERS NOT LESS
 THAN 1 IN. HIGH ON A CONTRASTING BACKGROUND THAT READS
 AS FOLLOWS IS LOCATED ON OR ADJACENT TO THE DOOR LEAF.
 THIS DOOR TO REMAIN UNLOCKED WHEN THE BUILDING IS
 OCCUPIED.
 (3) THE LOCKING DEVICE IS OF A TYPE THAT IS READILY
 DISTINGUISHABLE AS LOCKED.
 (4) A KEY IS IMMEDIATELY AVAILABLE TO ANY OCCUPANT
 INSIDE THE BUILDING WHEN IT IS LOCKED.
 SHOULD ALL OF THE ABOVE NOT BE POSSIBLE:
 7.2.1.5.1 DOOR LEAVES SHALL BE ARRANGED TO BE OPENED
 READILY FROM THE EGRESS SIDE WHENEVER THE BUILDING IS
 OCCUPIED.
 7.2.1.5.3 LOCKS, IF PROVIDED, SHALL NOT REQUIRE THE USE
 OF A KEY, A TOOL, OR SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE OR EFFORT FOR
 OPERATION FROM THE EGRESS SIDE.
 7.2.1.5.10 A LATCH OR OTHER FASTENING DEVICE ON A DOOR
 LEAF SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A RELEASING DEVICE THAT HAS
 AN OBVIOUS METHOD OF OPERATION AND THAT IS READILY
 OPERATED UNDER ALL LIGHTING CONDITIONS.
 7.2.1.5.10.2 THE RELEASING MECHANISM SHALL OPEN THE
 DOOR LEAF WITH NOT MORE THAN ONE RELEASING OPERATION.
  
 AND
  
 PER SECTION 7.2.1.6.2, ACCESS-CONTROLLED EGRESS DOORS
 ARE PERMITTED PROVIDED THAT ALL SEVEN OF THE FOLLOWING
 CRITERIA ARE MET:
 1. A SENSOR SHALL BE PROVIDED ON THE EGRESS SIDE,
 ARRANGED TO DETECT AN OCCUPANT APPROACHING DOORS THAT
 ARE ARRANGED TO UNLOCK IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS UPON
 DETECTION OF AN APPROACHING OCCUPANT OR LOSS OF POWER
 TO THE SENSOR.
 2. LOSS OF POWER TO THE PART OF THE ACCESS CONTROL
 SYSTEM THAT LOCKS THE DOORS SHALL AUTOMATICALLY UNLOCK
 THE DOORS IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS.
 3. THE DOORS SHALL BE ARRANGED TO UNLOCK IN THE
 DIRECTION OF EGRESS FROM A MANUAL RELEASE DEVICE
 LOCATED VERTICALLY 40 TO 48 INCHES ABOVE THE FLOOR AND
 WITHIN 60 INCHES HORIZONTALLY OF THE SECURED DOORS.
 4. THE MANUAL RELEASE DEVICE SHALL BE READILY
 ACCESSIBLE AND CLEARLY IDENTIFIED BY A SIGN THAT READS
 PUSH TO EXIT.
 5. WHEN OPERATED, THE MANUAL RELEASE DEVICE SHALL
 RESULT IN DIRECT INTERRUPTION OF POWER TO THE LOCK,
 INDEPENDENT OF THE ACCESS CONTROL SYSTEM ELECTRONICS,
 AND THE DOORS SHALL REMAIN UNLOCKED FOR NOT LESS THAN
 30 SECONDS.
 6. ACTIVATION OF THE BUILDING FIRE ALARM SYSTEM SHALL
 AUTOMATICALLY UNLOCK THE DOORS IN THE DIRECTION OF
 EGRESS, AND THE DOORS SHALL REMAIN UNLOCKED UNTIL THE
 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM HAS BEEN MANUALLY RESET.
 7. ACTIVATION OF THE BUILDING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER
 SYSTEM OR AUTOMATIC DETECTION SYSTEM SHALL
 AUTOMATICALLY UNLOCK THE DOORS IN THE DIRECTION OF
 EGRESS, AND THE DOORS SHALL REMAIN UNLOCKED UNTIL THE
 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM HAS BEEN MANUALLY RESET.
  
 PER SECTION 7.2.1.5.5, ELECTRICALLY CONTROLLED EGRESS
 DOOR ASSEMBLIES ARE PERMITTED IF EQUIPPED WITH APPROVED
 LISTED HARDWARE THAT INCORPORATES A BUILT-IN SWITCH AND
 THE FOLLOWING FIVE CRITERIA ARE MET:
 1. THE HARDWARE FOR OCCUPANT RELEASE OF THE LOCK IS
 AFFIXED TO THE DOOR LEAF.
 2. THE HARDWARE HAS AN OBVIOUS METHOD OF OPERATION THAT
 IS READILY OPERATED IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS.
 3. THE HARDWARE IS CAPABLE OF BEING OPERATED WITH ONE
 HAND IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS.
 4. OPERATION OF THE HARDWARE INTERRUPTS THE POWER
 SUPPLY DIRECTLY TO THE ELECTRIC LOCK AND UNLOCKS THE
 DOOR ASSEMBLY IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS.
 5. LOSS OF POWER TO THE HARDWARE AUTOMATICALLY UNLOCKS
 THE DOOR ASSEMBLY IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS.
 NOTE: THESE REQUIREMENTS ARE DIFFERENT THAN THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF FOR MAGNETIC LOCKS WHEREBY AN OCCUPANT
 SENSOR AND PUSH TO EXIT BUTTON ARE NEEDED IN ON THE
 EGRESS SIDE.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2015-12-22 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 2015-12-22 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 2015-12-22 Time 12:07 Sent To  
Notes
2015-12-22 12:09:18THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 PLEASE CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING AS PROVISO:
  
 THESE PROVISO COMMENTS WILL BE VERIFIED AND CONFIRMED
 AT THE TIME OF FIRE INSPECTION. FAILURE TO FOLLOW THESE
 PROVISO COMMENTS WILL RESULT IN A FAILED FIRE
 INSPECTION.
  
 1. SHEET A 12.10 - ALL DOOR LOCKS AND HARDWARE SHALL
 COMPLY WITH NFPA 101, CHAPTER 7, INCLUDING BUT NOT
 LIMITED TO,
  
 7.2.1.5.5.1 EXTERIOR DOOR ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE PERMITTED
 TO HAVE KEY-OPERATED LOCKS FROM THE EGRESS SIDE,
 PROVIDED THAT ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA ARE MET.
 (1) THIS ALTERNATIVE IS PERMITTED IN CHAPTERS 11
 THROUGH 43 FOR THE SPECIFIC OCCUPANCY. ( IT IS
 PERMITTED UNDER CHAPTER 39, EXISTING BUSINESS
 OCCUPANCY)
 (2) A READILY VISIBLE, DURABLE SIGN IN LETTERS NOT LESS
 THAN 1 IN. HIGH ON A CONTRASTING BACKGROUND THAT READS
 AS FOLLOWS IS LOCATED ON OR ADJACENT TO THE DOOR LEAF.
 THIS DOOR TO REMAIN UNLOCKED WHEN THE BUILDING IS
 OCCUPIED.
 (3) THE LOCKING DEVICE IS OF A TYPE THAT IS READILY
 DISTINGUISHABLE AS LOCKED.
 (4) A KEY IS IMMEDIATELY AVAILABLE TO ANY OCCUPANT
 INSIDE THE BUILDING WHEN IT IS LOCKED.
 SHOULD ALL OF THE ABOVE NOT BE POSSIBLE:
 7.2.1.5.1 DOOR LEAVES SHALL BE ARRANGED TO BE OPENED
 READILY FROM THE EGRESS SIDE WHENEVER THE BUILDING IS
 OCCUPIED.
 7.2.1.5.3 LOCKS, IF PROVIDED, SHALL NOT REQUIRE THE USE
 OF A KEY, A TOOL, OR SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE OR EFFORT FOR
 OPERATION FROM THE EGRESS SIDE.
 7.2.1.5.10 A LATCH OR OTHER FASTENING DEVICE ON A DOOR
 LEAF SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A RELEASING DEVICE THAT HAS
 AN OBVIOUS METHOD OF OPERATION AND THAT IS READILY
 OPERATED UNDER ALL LIGHTING CONDITIONS.
 7.2.1.5.10.2 THE RELEASING MECHANISM SHALL OPEN THE
 DOOR LEAF WITH NOT MORE THAN ONE RELEASING OPERATION.
  
 AND
  
 PER SECTION 7.2.1.6.2, ACCESS-CONTROLLED EGRESS DOORS
 ARE PERMITTED PROVIDED THAT ALL SEVEN OF THE FOLLOWING
 CRITERIA ARE MET:
 1. A SENSOR SHALL BE PROVIDED ON THE EGRESS SIDE,
 ARRANGED TO DETECT AN OCCUPANT APPROACHING DOORS THAT
 ARE ARRANGED TO UNLOCK IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS UPON
 DETECTION OF AN APPROACHING OCCUPANT OR LOSS OF POWER
 TO THE SENSOR.
 2. LOSS OF POWER TO THE PART OF THE ACCESS CONTROL
 SYSTEM THAT LOCKS THE DOORS SHALL AUTOMATICALLY UNLOCK
 THE DOORS IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS.
 3. THE DOORS SHALL BE ARRANGED TO UNLOCK IN THE
 DIRECTION OF EGRESS FROM A MANUAL RELEASE DEVICE
 LOCATED VERTICALLY 40 TO 48 INCHES ABOVE THE FLOOR AND
 WITHIN 60 INCHES HORIZONTALLY OF THE SECURED DOORS.
 4. THE MANUAL RELEASE DEVICE SHALL BE READILY
 ACCESSIBLE AND CLEARLY IDENTIFIED BY A SIGN THAT READS
 PUSH TO EXIT.
 5. WHEN OPERATED, THE MANUAL RELEASE DEVICE SHALL
 RESULT IN DIRECT INTERRUPTION OF POWER TO THE LOCK,
 INDEPENDENT OF THE ACCESS CONTROL SYSTEM ELECTRONICS,
 AND THE DOORS SHALL REMAIN UNLOCKED FOR NOT LESS THAN
 30 SECONDS.
 6. ACTIVATION OF THE BUILDING FIRE ALARM SYSTEM SHALL
 AUTOMATICALLY UNLOCK THE DOORS IN THE DIRECTION OF
 EGRESS, AND THE DOORS SHALL REMAIN UNLOCKED UNTIL THE
 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM HAS BEEN MANUALLY RESET.
 7. ACTIVATION OF THE BUILDING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER
 SYSTEM OR AUTOMATIC DETECTION SYSTEM SHALL
 AUTOMATICALLY UNLOCK THE DOORS IN THE DIRECTION OF
 EGRESS, AND THE DOORS SHALL REMAIN UNLOCKED UNTIL THE
 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM HAS BEEN MANUALLY RESET.
  
 PER SECTION 7.2.1.5.5, ELECTRICALLY CONTROLLED EGRESS
 DOOR ASSEMBLIES ARE PERMITTED IF EQUIPPED WITH APPROVED
 LISTED HARDWARE THAT INCORPORATES A BUILT-IN SWITCH AND
 THE FOLLOWING FIVE CRITERIA ARE MET:
 1. THE HARDWARE FOR OCCUPANT RELEASE OF THE LOCK IS
 AFFIXED TO THE DOOR LEAF.
 2. THE HARDWARE HAS AN OBVIOUS METHOD OF OPERATION THAT
 IS READILY OPERATED IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS.
 3. THE HARDWARE IS CAPABLE OF BEING OPERATED WITH ONE
 HAND IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS.
 4. OPERATION OF THE HARDWARE INTERRUPTS THE POWER
 SUPPLY DIRECTLY TO THE ELECTRIC LOCK AND UNLOCKS THE
 DOOR ASSEMBLY IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS.
 5. LOSS OF POWER TO THE HARDWARE AUTOMATICALLY UNLOCKS
 THE DOOR ASSEMBLY IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS.
 NOTE: THESE REQUIREMENTS ARE DIFFERENT THAN THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF FOR MAGNETIC LOCKS WHEREBY AN OCCUPANT
 SENSOR AND PUSH TO EXIT BUTTON ARE NEEDED IN ON THE
 EGRESS SIDE.
  
  
  
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2016-03-16 Cont ID  
Sent By ccole Date 2016-03-16 Time 11:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ccole Date 2016-03-04 Time 12:47 Sent To  
Notes
2016-03-08 12:48:19RESUB ROUTED TO RLECKY'S DESK
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2016-02-22 Cont ID  
Sent By tklarge Date 2016-02-22 Time 07:22 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tklarge Date 2016-02-12 Time 09:51 Sent To  
Notes
2016-02-16 09:51:59C40
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2016-01-29 Cont ID  
Sent By rlecky Date 2016-01-29 Time 13:45 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rlecky Date 2015-12-18 Time 16:12 Sent To  
Notes
2015-12-18 16:13:02C03
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2016-03-16 Cont ID  
Sent By ccole Date 2016-03-16 Time 11:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ccole Date 2016-03-16 Time 11:46 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2016-02-19 Cont ID  
Sent By ccole Date 2016-02-19 Time 13:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ccole Date 2016-02-19 Time 13:53 Sent To  
Notes
2016-02-19 14:09:592ND REVIEW: FBC 2014 MECHANICAL
 PERMIT #15120647
 2/19/16
  
 1) SHEET M02.01: PLEASE REFER TO SECTION 606.2.2 FBC-14
 MECHANICAL- DUCT SMOKE DETECTORS ARE REQUIRED IN THE
 RETURN AIR SYSTEMS.
 2) M01.01: HP-4 AT 72MBH APPEARS TO BE OVERSIZED WHEN
 COMPARE TO THE SUBMITTED AC CALCULATIONS INDICATING A
 LOAD OF 37,5MBH- SEE SECTION C403.2.2 FBC-14 ENERGY
 CONSERVATION.
  
 CHRISTOPHER L. COLE
 MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER
 561-805-6719
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-12-23 Cont ID  
Sent By ccole Date 2015-12-23 Time 14:29 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ccole Date 2015-12-23 Time 14:29 Sent To  
Notes
2015-12-23 14:48:561ST REVIEW 2014 MECHANICAL
 PERMIT #15120647
 12/23/15
  
 1) PROVIDE AC COOLING AND HEATING CALCULATIONS IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH ASHRAE/ACCA STANDARD 183 OR ACCA MANUAL
 N- SEE SECTION C403.2.1 FBC-14 ENERGY CONSERVATION.
 2) SHEET M02.01, KEYNOTE #12: INDICATE HOW THE EXHAUST
 DUCT FROM THE SECOND FLOOR IS CONNECTING WITH THE ERV.
 3) M02.01: SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF THE ALL REQUIRED DUCT
 SMOKE DETECTORS AND PROVIDE NOTES TO CLARIFY CONTROLS
 OPERATIONS AND SUPERVSION- SECTION 606 FBC-14
 MECHANICAL.
 4) M02.01: NOTE #17 APPEARS TO BE POINTING TO AN
 EXHAUST DUCT INSTEAD OF A REMOTE KEY STATION: PLEASE
 CORRECT.
  
 CHRISTOPHER L. COLE
 MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER
 561-805-6719
 [email protected]
  
  
  
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2016-02-22 Cont ID  
Sent By tklarge Date 2016-02-22 Time 03:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tklarge Date 2016-02-22 Time 03:19 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-12-30 Cont ID  
Sent By tklarge Date 2015-12-30 Time 14:52 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tklarge Date 2015-12-30 Time 14:13 Sent To  
Notes
2015-12-30 14:40:101) SUBMIT MANUF. SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE DRAIN PUMP. WPB
 AMEND. TO FBC. SEC.107.2.1.
 2) THE PLUMBING RISER SHOWS A 3" W FROM DP 1 BUT THE
 DRAIN PUMP SCHEDULE ON SHT.P01.01 SHOWS THE DISCHARGE
 LINE AS 2". CLARIFY.
 3) THE PLUMBING RISER SHOWS THE 3"W FROM DP 1 ALSO
 CONNECTING TO THE VENT.IT APPEARS THAT THE WASTE WOULD
 ALSO BE PUMPED INTO THE VENT.CLARIFY.
 4) SHT.P01.01 - DETAIL #3 SHOWS A VALVE IN THE P & T
 LINE. 2014 FBC-PLUMBING SEC. 504.6 (12).
 5) MEANS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO CONTROL THERMAL EXPANSION
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 2014 FBC-PLUMBING SEC.607.3
 6) A VALVE IS REQUIRED IN THE WATER SUPPLY LINE TO THE
 WATER HEATER. FBCP SEC.503.1.
  
 PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW
 TIM LARGE
 CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR
 561-805-6692
 [email protected]
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved