| Plan Review Stops For Permit 15120235 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-06-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-06-02 |
Time |
09:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-06-02 |
Time |
09:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-04-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-04-18 |
Time |
13:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-04-18 |
Time |
13:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-04-18 13:49:55 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | 1. THE DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED DIGITALLY WERE NOT PROVIDED: | | | | | | PERMIT APPLICATION, PRODUCT APPROVALS, ESTIMATE, ANY | | | OTHER DOCUMENTS REQUESTED IN PREVIOUS PLAN REVIEWS. | | | | | | A REVIEW WILL BE DONE AFTER A COMPLETE PERMIT SUBMITTAL | | | IS PROVIDED. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-03-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-03-23 |
Time |
10:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-03-23 |
Time |
10:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-03-23 09:36:12 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | 1. DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED FOR | | | PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO SIGNED, SEALED, DATED ORIGINALS, | | | FS471. THE PLAN PROVIDED IS NOT DIGITALLY SIGNED AND | | | SEALED; HOW WAS TANER HAMZAWI, PE GOING TO SIGN AND | | | SEAL THIS DOCUMENT? | | | | | | 2. A TITLE BLOCK IN ACCORDANCE WITH FAC61G15-23.002 IS | | | REQUIRED ON PAGES PREPARED BY TANER HAMZAWI, PE. | | | | | | 3. SEE PREVIOUS LIST REGARDING EXPOSURE CLASSIFICATION | | | AND SEE DEFINITION, FBC 5TH EDITION RESIDENTIAL | | | 301.2.1.4. ENGINEER TO EXPLAIN RATIONALE FOR EXPOSURE | | | B. | | | | | | THE PLAN IN "DRAWINGS" STATES THIS IS EXPOSURE B. THE | | | PLAN, DATED 11/23/2015, IN "SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS", IS | | | EXPOSURE C. PLAN PAGES BELONG IN THE DRAWINGS FOLDER. | | | | | | THE PLAN ALSO LACKS DESIGN PRESSURES FOR THE WALL | | | COMPONENTS & CLADDING, FBC R 301. | | | | | | WHY IS THE DATE ON THE PLAN 11/23/15 WHEN THE PLAN | | | REVIEW COMMENTS WERE DECEMBER AND MARCH? NO DELTA ON | | | THE PLAN INDICATING CHANGES AND VERSION. | | | | | | 4. THE ESTIMATE WAS RECEIVED. WHO WILL BE DOING THE | | | LABOR FOR THIS PROJECT? FBC 109. | | | | | | 5. AS DESIGN PRESSURES WERE NOT PROVIDED, THIS HAS NOT | | | BEEN REVIEWED. IF MORE THAN ONE INSTALLATION METHOD IS | | | INCLUDED IN THE PRODUCT APPROVAL, INDICATE WHICH OPTION | | | IS PROPOSED. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-03-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-03-01 |
Time |
12:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-03-01 |
Time |
12:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-03-01 12:26:54 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | FROM PREVIOUS LIST: | | | | | | 1. VALUE IS TO INCLUDE LABOR, MATERIALS, OVERHEAD AND | | | PROFIT, FBC 109. PROVIDE A VERIFIABLE COPY OF THE | | | CONTRACT. | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW, NOT ADDRESSED. A COST BREAKDOWN (STICK | | | ESTIMATE) MAY ALSO BE REQUIRED. | | | | | | 2. THE DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL IS EXPIRED AND LACKS THE | | | COVER SHEET (WHICH SHOWS THE CODE, STATUS, AND OTHER | | | INFORMATION). WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG, FAC9N-3. | | | | | | 3. FLORIDA STATE OR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL REQUIRED FOR | | | THE HARDIPLANK, FAC9N-3, FBC 5TH EDITION 301. REPLACE | | | THE ICC EVALUATION REPORT WITH THE FLORIDA STATE | | | PRODUCT APPROVAL, INCLUDING THE COVER SHEET. | | | | | | 4. THE FLORIDA STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL SHOULD INCLUDE | | | EVALUTION REPORT AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. REPLACE | | | THE DOCUMENT UPLOADED, HARDIPLANK INSTALLATION | | | INSTRUCTIONS, WITH THE INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS IN THE | | | PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | | | | | NEW COMMENT: | | | | | | 5. THIS PARCEL IS LOCATED IN EXPOSURE C, REVISE PLAN. | | | | | | 6. TOO MANY DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED. SEE PREVIOUS | | | LIST, PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE EXPIRED (WRONG CODE). | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS HAVE BEEN UPLOADED AS SEVERAL | | | DOCUMENTS RATHER THAN ONE DOCUMENT. WHEN RESUBMITTING, | | | THE CORRECT DOCUMENT IS TO SUPERSEDE THE DOCUMENT WHICH | | | FAILED PLAN REVIEW USING THE SAME NAMING CONVENTION. | | | SINCE THIS WAS NOT DONE, IT APPEARS THAT THE OLD | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE STILL IN THE FILE, ALONG WITH NEW | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS. | | | | | | ONE OF THE NEW PRODUCT APPROVAL DOCUMENTS UPLOADED | | | (FL13192) REFERS TO FBC 2010. IT APPEARS THAT | | | ADDITIONAL EXPIRED DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN UPLOADED. | | | | | | IF APPLICANT IS UNABLE TO PROPERLY SUBMIT DIGITALLY, IT | | | IS RECOMMENDED THAT THIS BE SUBMITTED AS A PAPER | | | SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | IF APPLICANT WOULD LIKE TO CONTINUE WITH THE DIGITAL | | | PROCESS, ENSURE THAT EACH PRODUCT APPROVAL IS ONE | | | UPLOADED DOCUMENT AND IS CURRENT. EXPIRED DOCUMENTS ARE | | | TO BE REMOVED. IT APPEARS THAT, ALTHOUGH ONLY TWO | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE REQUIRED (SO THERE SHOULD BE TWO | | | DOCUMENTS), THERE ARE EIGHT PRODUCT APPROVAL UPLOADS. | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-12-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2015-12-22 |
Time |
09:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2015-12-22 |
Time |
09:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-12-22 10:00:46 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | 1. VALUE IS TO INCLUDE LABOR, MATERIALS, OVERHEAD AND | | | PROFIT, FBC 109. PROVIDE A VERIFIABLE COPY OF THE | | | CONTRACT. | | | | | | 2. THE DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL IS EXPIRED AND LACKS THE | | | COVER SHEET (WHICH SHOWS THE CODE, STATUS, AND OTHER | | | INFORMATION). WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG, FAC9N-3. | | | | | | 3. FLORIDA STATE OR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL REQUIRED FOR | | | THE HARDIPLANK, FAC9N-3, FBC 5TH EDITION 301. REPLACE | | | THE ICC EVALUATION REPORT WITH THE FLORIDA STATE | | | PRODUCT APPROVAL, INCLUDING THE COVER SHEET. | | | | | | 4. THE FLORIDA STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL SHOULD INCLUDE | | | EVALUTION REPORT AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. REPLACE | | | THE DOCUMENT UPLOADED, HARDIPLANK INSTALLATION | | | INSTRUCTIONS, WITH THE INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS IN THE | | | PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
HIST |
HISTORICAL |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-06-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
fmittner |
Date |
2016-06-01 |
Time |
13:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
fmittner |
Date |
2016-06-01 |
Time |
13:58 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
HIST |
HISTORICAL |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-04-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
fmittner |
Date |
2016-04-11 |
Time |
12:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
fmittner |
Date |
2016-04-11 |
Time |
12:28 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
HIST |
HISTORICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-03-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
fmittner |
Date |
2016-03-18 |
Time |
16:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
fmittner |
Date |
2016-03-18 |
Time |
16:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
HIST |
HISTORICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-02-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
fmittner |
Date |
2016-02-25 |
Time |
11:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
fmittner |
Date |
2016-02-25 |
Time |
11:39 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2016-02-25 11:40:39 | APPROVED BY HPB, NO STAMP NEEDED VIA SK |
|
|
| Review Stop |
HIST |
HISTORICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-12-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
fmittner |
Date |
2015-12-28 |
Time |
14:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
fmittner |
Date |
2015-12-28 |
Time |
14:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-12-28 14:54:17 | HARDI BOARD NOT PERMITTED IN HSITORIC DISTRICTS. FHM | | | E-MAIL CONTRACTOR. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-06-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-06-02 |
Time |
09:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-05-25 |
Time |
13:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-05-25 13:03:44 | RESUB ROUTED TO FMITTNER VIA ZONING INBOX |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-04-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-04-18 |
Time |
13:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-04-04 |
Time |
11:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-04-04 11:18:33 | RESUB ROUTED TO HISTORIC VIA ZONING |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-03-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-03-23 |
Time |
10:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-03-16 |
Time |
07:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-03-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-03-01 |
Time |
12:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-02-25 |
Time |
08:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-01-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2016-01-11 |
Time |
13:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2015-12-07 |
Time |
15:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-06-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cpuell |
Date |
2016-06-02 |
Time |
13:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cpuell |
Date |
2016-06-02 |
Time |
13:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-03-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-03-23 |
Time |
10:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-03-23 |
Time |
10:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-03-23 10:15:08 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | 1. HOW WILL THE DIGITAL SIGNATURE BE PROVIDED? THE | | | PLANS ARE NOT DIGITALLY SIGNED AND SEALED. IF PAPER | | | DOCUMENTS ARE PROVIDED FOR THE DIGITAL SIGNATURE, | | | PLEASE BE AWARE THAT THIS WILL REQUIRE A PLAN REVIEW | | | WHICH MAY TAKE UP TO A WEEK. | | | | | | 2. THE PLANS PREPARED BY THE ENGINEER LACK THE TITLE | | | BLOCK REQUIRED BY FS 471. | | | |
|
|
