| Plan Review Stops For Permit 15100912 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-11-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cthroop |
Date |
2015-11-19 |
Time |
08:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cthroop |
Date |
2015-11-19 |
Time |
08:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-11-19 08:39:36 | CHRISTOPHER S. THROOP, C.B.O. | | | BLDG. PLANS EXAMINER ? PX3169 | | | (561) 805-6718 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-11-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2015-11-12 |
Time |
07:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2015-11-12 |
Time |
07:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-11-12 07:24:25 | PLAN | | | REVIEW COMMENTS | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW: FBC FIFTH EDITION (2014) | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561) 805-6714 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | DENIED BY BUILDING | | | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: | | | | | | 1) THE DETAIL FOR ANCHORING THE PANELS TO THE CONCRETE | | | ROOF TILE IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. THERE IS NO WAY FOR THE | | | INSPECTORS TO DETERMINE THAT THE CAVITIES UNDER THE | | | TILE TO WHICH THE BRACKET IS ATTACHED OR THE FIVE TILES | | | AROUND IT ARE FILLED COMPLETELY WITH DOW TILE BOND | | | ADHESIVE OR EQUAL. CONCRETE ROOF TILE MAY BE ATTACHED | | | MECHANICALLY AND WHEN ATTACHED WITH ADHESIVES THE | | | CAVITIES ARE NOT FILLED COMPLETELY. THE PERSON THAT | | | APPLIES THE ROOF TILE ADHESIVES IS REQUIRED TO BE | | | TRAINED AND CERTIFIED BY THE MANUFACTURER. THERE IS NO | | | TESTING TO SHOW THAT ATTACHING ANYTHING DIRECTLY TO | | | CONCRETE ROOF TILE WITH SCREWS IS ACCEPTABLE. THERE IS | | | NO ROOF TILE MANUFACTURER'S THAT WILL APPROVE THIS | | | ATTACHMENT METHOD USING THEIR TILE AS THE ANCHOR | | | SUBSTRATE. PROVIDE AN ANCHORING METHOD THAT USES A | | | SUITABLE SUBSTRATE. FBC-R905.3.7 | | | THE ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATE THAT WAS CIRCLED ON THE | | | DRAWING STATES "PROVIDE TAPCON SCREWS OF ADEQUATE | | | LENGTH TO SECURE BRACKET TO CEMENT TILE". |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-10-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2015-10-30 |
Time |
09:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2015-10-30 |
Time |
09:31 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2015-10-29 19:09:48 | PLAN | | | REVIEW COMMENTS | | | | | | 1ST REVIEW: FBC FIFTH EDITION (2014) | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561) 805-6714 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | DENIED BY BUILDING | | | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: | | | | | | 1) THE PLANS HAVE SEVERAL REFERENCES TO THE 2010 FBC. | | | THE FBC FIFTH EDITION (2014) WENT INTO EFFECT ON JUNE | | | 30, 2015. ALL NEW PERMITS APPLIED FOR ON OR AFTER THAT | | | DATE ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH AND REFERENCE THE FBC | | | FIFTH EDITION. | | | | | | 2) THE DETAIL FOR ANCHORING THE PANELS TO THE CONCRETE | | | ROOF TILE IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. THERE IS NO WAY FOR THE | | | INSPECTORS TO DETERMINE THAT THE CAVITIES UNDER THE | | | TILE TO WHICH THE BRACKET IS ATTACHED OR THE FIVE TILES | | | AROUND IT ARE FILLED COMPLETELY WITH DOW TILE BOND | | | ADHESIVE OR EQUAL. CONCRETE ROOF TILE MAY BE ATTACHED | | | MECHANICALLY AND WHEN ATTACHED WITH ADHESIVES THE | | | CAVITIES ARE NOT FILLED COMPLETELY. THE PERSON THAT | | | APPLIES THE ROOF TILE ADHESIVES IS REQUIRED TO BE | | | TRAINED AND CERTIFIED BY THE MANUFACTURER. THERE IS NO | | | TESTING TO SHOW THAT ATTACHING ANYTHING DIRECTLY TO | | | CONCRETE ROOF TILE WITH SCREWS IS ACCEPTABLE. THERE IS | | | NO ROOF TILE MANUFACTURER'S THAT WILL APPROVE THIS | | | ATTACHMENT METHOD USING THEIR TILE AS THE ANCHOR | | | SUBSTRATE. PROVIDE AN ANCHORING METHOD THAT USES A | | | SUITABLE SUBSTRATE. FBC-R905.3.7 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-11-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
albarran |
Date |
2015-11-10 |
Time |
08:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
albarran |
Date |
2015-11-10 |
Time |
08:44 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2015-11-10 08:58:27 | ALL PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED ITEMS HAVE BEEN SATISFACTORILY | | | ADDRESSED. | | | FILE WALKED TO ROBBIE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-11-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
albarran |
Date |
2015-11-02 |
Time |
13:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
albarran |
Date |
2015-11-02 |
Time |
13:04 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2015-11-02 13:18:12 | THE PLANS FOR THE ABOVE MENTIONED PERMIT APPLICATION | | | HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE 2011 EDITION | | | OF THE NEC, (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE); THE 5TH EDITION | | | OF THE FBC, (FLORIDA BUILDING CODE) AS APPLICABLE AND | | | BELOW ARE THE DEFICIENCIES NOTED. | | | THOUGH THE PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED DEFICIENCIES HAVE BEEN | | | ADDRESSED, THE NEW PLANS HAVE A COUPLE OF ITEMS NEEDING | | | CORRECTION: | | | 1. PER NEC REQUIREMENTS YOU SHALL PROVIDE A FEEDER | | | DIAGRAM INDICATING LOCATION OF DISCONNECT AND THE | | | PROPOSED DEVICE. THIS FEEDER DIAGRAM SHALL INCLUDE LOAD | | | CALCS, CONDUCTOR SIZING AND OVER-CURRENT PROTECTION. | | | 2. ACCORDING TO THE SUPPLIED LITERATURE THIS EQUIPMENT | | | WILL OPERATE ON EITHER 120 VAC OR 240 VAC INDICATE HOW | | | YOU WILL BE OPERATING THE DEVICE. | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING, FOR A QUICKER RETURN ON YOUR | | | RE-SUBMITTAL, YOU ARE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER (NARRATIVE) ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE | | | STANDARD CITY RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE | | | INSERT CORRECTED PAGES INTO THE SUBMITTAL AND LEAVE THE | | | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS FOR COMPARISON. | | | CLOUDING THE CHANGES WILL BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE FURTHER QUESTIONS, PLEASE DON?T HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT ME DIRECTLY. | | | | | | THANK YOU, | | | MIKE ALBARRAN | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-11-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cthroop |
Date |
2015-11-19 |
Time |
08:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cthroop |
Date |
2015-11-18 |
Time |
10:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-11-18 10:49:39 | RESUB ROUTED TO RMCDOUGAL |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-11-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
albarran |
Date |
2015-11-02 |
Time |
13:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
albarran |
Date |
2015-10-26 |
Time |
13:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-11-02 13:23:58 | 11/2/15 FAILED ELECTRICAL REVIEW. CONTRACTOR NOTIFIED | | | VIA EMAIL. SENT TO SMALL DENIED BIN "B". MA | | 2015-10-27 13:21:50 | ROUTED TO POOL INBOX |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-11-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-11-02 |
Time |
10:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-11-02 |
Time |
10:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-11-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-11-02 |
Time |
05:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-11-02 |
Time |
04:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|