Plan Review Details - Permit 15090205
Plan Review Stops For Permit 15090205
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2015-12-09 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2015-12-09 Time 17:58 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date 2015-12-09 Time 14:45 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2015-12-08 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2015-12-08 Time 07:23 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date 2015-12-08 Time 05:58 Sent To  
Notes
2015-12-08 07:23:19BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
 W. P. B. PERMIT: 15090205
 ADD: 2497 OKEECHOBEE BLVD SUITE
 CONT: HEARTLAND RETAIL CONSTRUCTION INC.
 TEL: ( 407)654-2521 / RACHEL MEYERS
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
 2014 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W
 * 2014 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION,
  
 2014 EXISTING BUILDING CODE LEVEL II 701.3 COMPLIANCE.
 ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, SYSTEMS, AND
 SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING.
  
 4TH REVIEW
 DATE: WED. DEC. 09/2015
 ACTION: PASSED
  
 JAMES A. WITMER CBO
 SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 TEL: 561-805-6715
 FAX: 561-805-6676
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
  
  
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2015-11-12 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2015-11-12 Time 11:33 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date 2015-11-12 Time 09:54 Sent To  
Notes
2015-11-23 14:06:1711/23/15 ON MALBARRAN'S DESK. CP
2015-11-12 11:33:25BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
 W. P. B. PERMIT: 15090205
 ADD: 2497 OKEECHOBEE BLVD SUITE # ????????
 CONT: TBD
 TEL: ( 407)654-2521 / RACHEL MEYERS
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
 2014 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W
 * 2014 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION,
  
 2014 EXISTING BUILDING CODE LEVEL II 701.3 COMPLIANCE.
 ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, SYSTEMS, AND
 SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING.
  
 2ND REVIEW
 DATE: THURS. NOV. 12/2015
 ACTION: DENIED
  
 1)2ND REQUEST. NOTE ONLY ONE ORIGINAL SIGNED & SEALED
 COVER SHEET WAS SUBMITTED. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS BY
 JOHN DIDONONATO P. E. ARE COPIES NOT ORIGINAL
 SIGNATURES PLEASE SUBMIT (3) ORIGINAL SIGNED AND SEALED
 DOCUMENTS. THIS PROJECT WILL REQUIRE 3 OF ALL DOCUMENTS
 SINCE THERE WILL BE A RESIDENT INSPECTOR.
 PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS
 PREPARED BY THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AND BEING FILED FOR
 PUBLIC RECORD SHALL HAVE THE SIGNATURE AND SEAL OF THE
 DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AFFIXED TO THE DOCUMENT.
 61G15-23.002(2) FL. ADMIN. CODE.
  
 2) 2ND REQUEST. NOTE ONLY ONE ORIGINAL SIGNED & SEALED
 COVER SHEET WAS SUBMITTED. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS
 PREPARED BY JOHN DIDONONATO P. E. DO NOT HAVE EACH PAGE
 SEALED. 61G15-23.002(2) FL. ADMIN. CODE. A COVER SHEET
 OR INDEX SHEET FOR ENGINEERING SPECIFICATIONS MAY BE
 USED AND THAT SHEET MUST BE SIGNED IN RESPONSIBLE
 CHARGE OF THE PRODUCTION & PREPARATION OF EACH SECTION
 OF THE ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION WITH SUFFICIENT
 INFORMATION ON THE COVER SHEET OR INDEX LISTING HOW
 MANY PAGES ARE COVERED UNDER THE COVER SHEET OR INDEX
 SHEET.
  
 3)SEMI-COMPLIED. THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT HAS BEEN
 PROVIDED, THE CORRECT WIND EXPOSURE IS A C EXPOSURE, IF
 THE DESIGNER OF RECORD WISHES TO DESIGN THE STRUCTURE
 TO EXPOSURE D WITH THE HIGHER POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE
 PRESSURES WE WILL REVIEW AS SUCH. SHEET S0.1 PROVIDE
 THE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA AS 170 VULT, EXPOSURE D, WHAT
 IS NOT PROVIDED IS THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT OF THE
 STRUCTURE FOR THE ADJUSTMENT FACTORS FOR HEIGHT &
 EXPOSURE, 2014 FBC-B TABLE 1609.7(2).
  
 4) 2ND REQUEST. TO DATE THERE IS ONLY THE WIND DESIGN
 CRITERIA, THERE HAS BEEN NO WIND CHARTS SHOWING THE
 PRESSURES FOR ZONES 1-5 FOR THE VARIOUS SQUARE FEET. 10
 SQ. FT., 20 SQ. FT. 50 SQ. FT., & 100 SQ. FT.
 THE PLANS DO NOT PROVIDE THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING
 (MEAN ROOF HEIGHT. 2014 FBC-B TABLE 1609.7(2). PLEASE
 PROVIDE THE WIND DESIGN PRESSURES IN VASD SINCE ALL
 PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE IN VASD. 2014 FBC-B 1609.3.
  
 5) COMPLIED. DEFERRED SUBMITTAL. SUBMITTED PRODUCT
 APPROVALS WILL BE RETURNED NOT REVIEWED NOR STAMPED.
 . 2010 FBC-B 1609.1.2 PROTECTION OF OPENINGS,
 1609.6.4.4.1 COMPONENTS & CLADDING. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT
 OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS RULE 9N-3 NOV. 01/ 2010 (31)
 SUB-CATEGORY OF PRODUCTS OR CONSTRUCTION SYSTEMS THAT
 WILL REQUIRE PRODUCT APPROVALS:
 (31)(A) EXTERIOR DOORS.
 (B) WINDOWS
 (C) PANEL WALLS: STOREFRONTS, CURTAIN WALLS, WALL
 LOUVERS, LINTELS & EFIS SYSTEMS,
 (D) ROOFING PRODUCTS AND ASSEMBLIES
 (G) PRE-ENGINEERED A/C STANDS
  
 6)COMPLIED. DEFERRED SUBMITTAL.. 2010 FBC 107.3.4.1
 PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED
 BY THE DCA RULE 9N-03 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN
 WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL
 FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. FL 61G1-23.015 (2) THE
 ARCHITECT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SUPERVISING AND REVIEWING
 ALL PROJECT DATA, REPORTS, SHOP DRAWINGS ETC..
  
 EITHER THE DESIGNER OF RECORD OR CONTRACTOR CAN DEFER
 THE PRODUCT APPROVALS TO BE SUBMITTED AFTER PERMIT
 ISSUANCE AS A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL AS LONG AS THE
 PRESSURES ON THE BUILDING ARE CORRECT PLEASE REQUEST IN
 WRITING AS PART OF THE PERMIT DOCUMENTS. 107.3.4.2
 DEFERRED SUBMITTALS. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION,
 DEFERRED SUBMITTALS ARE DEFINED AS THOSE PORTIONS OF
 THE DESIGN THAT ARE NOT SUBMITTED AT THE TIME OF THE
 APPLICATION AND THAT ARE TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE
 BUILDING OFFICIAL WITHIN A SPECIFIED PERIOD. DEFERRAL
 OF ANY SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL HAVE THE PRIOR APPROVAL OF
 THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. THE
 REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE
 SHALL LIST THE DEFERRED SUBMITTALS ON THE CONSTRUCTION
 DOCUMENTS FOR REVIEW BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL.
 DOCUMENTS FOR DEFERRED SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED TO THE REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN
 RESPONSIBLE CHARGE WHO SHALL REVIEW THEM AND FORWARD
 THEM TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL WITH A NOTATION
 INDICATING THAT THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS HAVE
 BEEN REVIEWED AND FOUND TO BE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE TO
 THE DESIGN OF THE BUILDING. THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL
 ITEMS SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED UNTIL THE DEFERRED
 SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE BUILDING
 OFFICIAL.
  
 7)2ND REQUEST. PLEASE NOTE THAT WELDED AND BOLTED
 CONNECTIONS WILL REQUIRE EITHER THIRD PARTY
 CERTIFICATION OR A RESIDENT INSPECTOR. PLEASE PROVIDE
 WHICH THE DESIGNER OF RECORD OR THE CONTRACTOR WISHES
 TO USE ON THIS PROJECT. IF A RESIDENT INSPECTOR IS
 CHOSEN, FORMS WILL BE E-MAILED FOR THE REQUIRED
 SIGNATURES BY ALL INVOLVED PARTIES. 110.3.9 OTHER
 INSPECTIONS SERVICES.
  
 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING
 CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 110.3.9 OTHER
 INSPECTIONS SERVICES. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY MAKE,
 OR CAUSE TO BE MADE BY OTHERS, THE INSPECTIONS REQUIRED
 BY SECTION 109. HE/SHE MAY ACCEPT REPORTS OF INSPECTORS
 OF RECOGNIZED INSPECTION SERVICES, PROVIDED THAT AFTER
 INVESTIGATION HE/SHE IS SATISFIED AS TO THEIR
 QUALIFICATIONS AND RELIABILITY. A CERTIFICATE CALLED
 FOR BY ANY PROVISION OF THE TECHNICAL CODES SHALL NOT
 BE BASED ON SUCH REPORTS UNLESS THE SAME ARE IN WRITING
 AND CERTIFIED BY A RESPONSIBLE OFFICER OF SUCH SERVICE.
 THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY REQUIRE THE OWNER TO EMPLOY
 AN INSPECTION SERVICE IN THE FOLLOWING INSTANCES:
  
 1. FOR BUILDINGS OR ADDITIONS OF TYPE I OR II
 CONSTRUCTION
 2. FOR ALL MAJOR STRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS
 3. WHERE THE CONCRETE DESIGN IS BASED ON COMPRESSIVE
 STRENGTH (F ?C) IN EXCESS OF 3000
 POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH
 4. FOR PILE DRIVING
 5. FOR BUILDINGS WITH AREA GREATER THAN 20,000 SQUARE
 FOOT
 6. FOR BUILDINGS MORE THAN 2 STORIES IN HEIGHT
 7. FOR BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES OF UNUSUAL DESIGN OR
 METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION
  
 7A) RESIDENT INSPECTOR FORMS MUST BE SIGNED BY ALL
 PARTIES NOTARIZED AND RETURNED TO THE BUILDING
 DEPARTMENT.
  
 7B) FOR THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR PLEASE PROVIDE A RESUME'
 OF INSPECTION EXPERIENCE ON PREVIOUS PROJECT. THE
 RESUME' MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY ALL CERTIFICATES AS
 SPECIFIED HEREIN. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OR HIS DESIGNEE
 WILL REVIEW THE RESUME'. AFTER THE RESUME' IS REVIEWED,
 AN INTERVIEW WILL BE SCHEDULED. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES
 WILL AN INSPECTOR BE INTERVIEWED FOR WORK WITHOUT FIRST
 MEETING THE ABOVE CRITERIA.
 CONTACT: KEN CONRAD
 TEL: 561-805-6666
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
 7C) THE CONTRACTOR WILL PRODUCE A JOB SUMMARY OR
 HISTORY FOR THIS TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION. THIS MAY BE
 SUBMITTED TO KEN CONRAD BY E-MAIL. KEN CONRAD:
 [email protected]
  
 7D) NOTE FOR PAPER PLANS 3 SETS OF DOCUMENTS ARE
 REQUIRED. FOR DIGITAL PLANS, AFTER PERMIT ISSUANCE, THE
 PERMIT LIBRARIAN WILL E-MAIL YOU, THE APPROVED AND
 BATCH STAMPED PLANS SO YOU MAY PRINT YOUR PLANS, TWO
 SETS OF PLANS WILL NEED TO BE PRINTED IN COLOR, (1) FOR
 THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR, THE OTHER FOR THE MEP
 INSPECTORS.
  
 7E) PLEASE CALL THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH?S AUTOMATED
 TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS LINE (561) 805-6700) FOR
 IN-PROGRESS INSPECTIONS FOR AUDITING OF JOBSITE
 INSPECTIONS.
  
 8) COMPLIED. SHEET S5.1 DETAIL 8 PROVIDES THE
 ATTACHMENT OF THE CURB, WOOD BLOCKING MEMBERS AND TO
 THE STEEL FRAMING MEMBERS. THE MECHANICAL SHEET M1.2
 SHOWS A FEW DETAILS OF ROOF TOP CURBS FOR THE NEW RTU'S
 ON THE ROOF BUT THERE IS NO ANCHORING DETAIL FOR THE
 CURBS, THE STRUCTURAL SHEETS DO NOT HAVE ANY ANCHORING
 DETAILS FOR THE ROOF TOP CURBS. COMPONENTS AND CLADDING
 ROOF TOP CURBS 1609.1.2.
  
 9) 2ND REQUEST. SEMI-COMPLIED. THERE IS A DIFFERENCE IN
 HOW THE RTU UNIT IS TO BE ATTACHED BETWEEN SHEET A2.0
 DETAIL # 1 AND SHEET S5.1 DETAIL # 8 THEY DO NOT MATCH
 UP. 107.2.1.3 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS REQUIRED. THE
 MECHANICAL NOR STRUCTURAL PLANS PROVIDE THE ATTACHMENT
 OF THE RTU TO THE CURB. PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH
 COMPONENTS & CLADDING 1609.1.2.
  
 10) COMPLIED. SHEET S1.1 SHOWS THE EXISTING AND NEW
 LAYOUT FOR NEW RTU'S ON THE ROOF. NEITHER THE A OR S
 PLANS INDICATE HOW COMPLIANCE WITH 2014 FBC-B SECTION
 1509.6.4 EQUIPMENT AND APPLIANCES ON ROOFS OR ELEVATED
 STRUCTURES. WHERE EQUIPMENT AND APPLIANCES REQUIRING
 ACCESS ARE INSTALLED ON ROOFS OR ELEVATED STRUCTURES AT
 A HEIGHT EXCEEDING 16 FEET (4877 MM), SUCH ACCESS SHALL
 BE PROVIDED BY A PERMANENT APPROVED MEANS OF ACCESS,
 THE EXTENT OF WHICH SHALL BE FROM GRADE OR FLOOR LEVEL
 TO THE EQUIPMENT AND APPLIANCES? LEVEL SERVICE SPACE.
 SUCH ACCESS SHALL NOT REQUIRE CLIMBING OVER
 OBSTRUCTIONS GREATER THAN 30 INCHES (762 MM) HIGH OR
 WALKING ON ROOFS HAVING A SLOPE GREATER THAN 4 UNITS
 VERTICAL IN 12 UNITS HORIZONTAL (33-PERCENT SLOPE).
 PERMANENT LADDERS INSTALLED TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED
 ACCESS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM DESIGN
 CRITERIA:
 10.1. THE SIDE RAILING SHALL EXTEND ABOVE THE PARAPET
 OR ROOF EDGE NOT LESS THAN 30 INCHES (762 MM).
 10.2. LADDERS SHALL HAVE RUNG SPACING NOT TO EXCEED 14
 INCHES (356 MM) ON CENTER.
 10.3. LADDERS SHALL HAVE A TOE SPACING NOT LESS THAN
 6-INCHES (152 MM) DEEP.
 10.4. THERE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES (457 MM)
 BETWEEN RAILS.
 10.5. RUNGS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 0.75-INCH (19 MM)
 DIAMETER AND BE CAPABLE OF WITHSTANDING A 300-POUND
 (136.1 KG) LOAD.
 10.6. LADDERS OVER 30 FEET (9144 MM) IN HEIGHT SHALL BE
 PROVIDED WITH OFFSET SECTIONS AND LANDINGS CAPABLE OF
 WITHSTANDING 100 POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT (488.2 KG/M2).
 10.7. LADDERS SHALL BE PROTECTED AGAINST CORROSION BY
 APPROVED MEANS. CATWALKS INSTALLED TO PROVIDE THE
 REQUIRED ACCESS SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN 24-INCHES (610
 MM) WIDE AND SHALL HAVE RAILINGS AS REQUIRED FOR
 SERVICE PLATFORMS.
  
 11) COMPLIED. ZONING COMMENTS INDICATE THERE MAY HAVE A
 NEED TO SCREEN THE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ON THE ROOF.
 PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH? 1509.6.1 HEIGHT
 LIMITATIONS.
 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENS SHALL NOT EXCEED 18 FEET
 (5486 MM) IN HEIGHT ABOVE THE ROOF DECK, AS MEASURED TO
 THE HIGHEST POINT ON THE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREEN.
 PLEASE PROVIDE THE ATTACHMENT FOR SCREEN FRAMING AS
 WELL AS THE SCREEN MATERIAL ITSELF, SHOW COMPLIANCE
 WITH 1609.6 WIND DESIGN.
  
 12) WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE
 REVISION & REMOVE ANY VOIDED SHEETS & REPLACE ANY PAGES
 AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL
 REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE
 REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION
 PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO
 EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED
 COOPERATION.
  
 JAMES A. WITMER CBO
 SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 TEL: 561-805-6715
 FAX: 561-805-6676
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
  
  
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-09-28 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2015-09-28 Time 07:30 Rev Time  
Received By jwitmer Date 2015-09-28 Time 05:59 Sent To  
Notes
2015-09-28 07:39:27BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
 W. P. B. PERMIT: 15090205
 ADD: 2497 OKEECHOBEE BLVD SUITE # ????????
 CONT: TBD
 TEL: ( 407)654-2521 / RACHEL MEYERS
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
 2014 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W
 * 2014 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION,
  
 2014 EXISTING BUILDING CODE LEVEL II 701.3 COMPLIANCE.
 ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, SYSTEMS, AND
 SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING.
  
 1ST REVIEW
 DATE: MON. SEPT. 28/2015
 ACTION: DENIED
  
 1) STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS BY JOHN DIDONONATO P. E. ARE
 COPIES NOT ORIGINAL SIGNATURES PLEASE SUBMIT (3)
 ORIGINAL SIGNED AND SEALED DOCUMENTS.
 PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS
 PREPARED BY THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AND BEING FILED FOR
 PUBLIC RECORD SHALL HAVE THE SIGNATURE AND SEAL OF THE
 DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AFFIXED TO THE DOCUMENT.
 61G15-23.002(2) FL. ADMIN. CODE.
  
 2) STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS PREPARED BY JOHN DIDONONATO
 P. E. DO NOT HAVE EACH PAGE SEALED. 61G15-23.002(2) FL.
 ADMIN. CODE. A COVER SHEET OR INDEX SHEET FOR
 ENGINEERING SPECIFICATIONS MAY BE USED AND THAT SHEET
 MUST BE SIGNED IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE OF THE PRODUCTION
 & PREPARATION OF EACH SECTION OF THE ENGINEERING
 SPECIFICATION WITH SUFFICIENT INFORMATION ON THE COVER
 SHEET OR INDEX LISTING HOW MANY PAGES ARE COVERED UNDER
 THE COVER SHEET OR INDEX SHEET.
  
 3) SHEET S0.1 PROVIDE THE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA AS 170
 VULT, EXPOSURE D, WHAT IS NOT PROVIDED IS THE MEAN ROOF
 HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE FOR THE ADJUSTMENT FACTORS FOR
 HEIGTH & EXPOSURE, 2014 FBC-B TABLE 1609.7(2).
  
 4) THE PLANS DO NOT PROVIDE THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING
 (MEAN ROOF HEIGHT. 2014 FBC-B TABLE 1609.7(2). PLEASE
 PROVIDE THE WIND DESIGN PRESSURES IN VASD SINCE ALL
 PRODUCT APPOVALS ARE IN VASD. 2014 FBC-B 1609.3.
  
 5) THIS REVIEW NO PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR COMPONENTS AND
 CLADDING WERE SUBMITTED. 2010 FBC-B 1609.1.2 PROTECTION
 OF OPENINGS, 1609.6.4.4.1 COMPONENTS & CLADDING.
 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS RULE 9N-3 NOV.
 01/ 2010 (31) SUB-CATEGORY OF PRODUCTS OR CONSTRUCTION
 SYSTEMS THAT WILL REQUIRE PRODUCT APPROVALS:
 (31)(A) EXTERIOR DOORS.
 (B) WINDOWS
 (C) PANEL WALLS: STOREFRONTS, CURTAIN WALLS, WALL
 LOUVERS, LINTELS & EFIS SYSTEMS,
 (D) ROOFING PRODUCTS AND ASSEMBLIES
 (G) PRE-ENGINEERED A/C STANDS
  
 6) 2010 FBC 107.3.4.1 PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCTS
 WHICH ARE REGULATED BY THE DCA RULE 9N-03 SHALL BE
 REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF
 RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL.
 FL 61G1-23.015 (2) THE ARCHITECT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR
 SUPERVISING AND REVIEWING ALL PROJECT DATA, REPORTS,
 SHOP DRAWINGS ETC..
  
 EITHER THE DESIGNER OF RECORD OR CONTRACTOR CAN DEFER
 THE PRODUCT APPROVALS TO BE SUBMITTED AFTER PERMIT
 ISSUANCE AS A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL AS LONG AS THE
 PRESSURES ON THE BUILDING ARE CORRECT PLEASE REQUEST IN
 WRITTING AS PART OF THE PERMIT DOCUMENTS. 107.3.4.2
 DEFERRED SUBMITTALS. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION,
 DEFERRED SUBMITTALS ARE DEFINED AS THOSE PORTIONS OF
 THE DESIGN THAT ARE NOT SUBMITTED AT THE TIME OF THE
 APPLICATION AND THAT ARE TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE
 BUILDING OFFICIAL WITHIN A SPECIFIED PERIOD. DEFERRAL
 OF ANY SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL HAVE THE PRIOR APPROVAL OF
 THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. THE
 REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE
 SHALL LIST THE DEFERRED SUBMITTALS ON THE CONSTRUCTION
 DOCUMENTS FOR REVIEW BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL.
 DOCUMENTS FOR DEFERRED SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED TO THE REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN
 RESPONSIBLE CHARGE WHO SHALL REVIEW THEM AND FORWARD
 THEM TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL WITH A NOTATION
 INDICATING THAT THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS HAVE
 BEEN REVIEWED AND FOUND TO BE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE TO
 THE DESIGN OF THE BUILDING. THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL
 ITEMS SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED UNTIL THE DEFERRED
 SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS HAVE
 BEEN APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL.
  
 7) PLEASE NOTE THAT WELDED AND BOLTED CONNECTIONS WILL
 REQUIRE EITHER THIRD PARTY CERTIFICATION OR A RESIDENT
 INSPECTOR. PLEASE PROVIDE WHICH THE DESIGNER OF RECORD
 OR THE CONTRACTOR WISHES TO USE ON THIS PROJECT. IF A
 RESIDENT INSPECTOR IS CHOSEN, FORMS WILL BE E-MAILED
 FOR THE REQUIRED SIGNATURES BY ALL INVOLVED PARTIES.
 110.3.9 OTHER INSPECTIONS SERVICES.
  
  
 8) THE MECHANICAL SHEET M1.2 SHOWS A FEW DETAILS OF
 ROOF TOP CURBS FOR THE NEW RTU'S ON THE ROOF BUT THERE
 IS NO ANCHORING DETAIL FOR THE CURBS, THE STRUCTURAL
 SHEETS DO NOT HAVE ANY ANCHORING DETAILS FOR THE ROOF
 TOP CURBS. COMPONENTS AND CLADDING ROOF TOP CURBS
 1609.1.2.
  
 9) THE MECHANICAL NOR STRUCTURAL PLANS PROVIDE THE
 ATTACHMENT OF THE RTU TO THE CURB. PLEASE SHOW
 COMPLIANCE WITH COMPONENTS & CLADDING 1609.1.2.
  
 10) SHEET S1.1 SHOWS THE EXISITNG AND NEW LAYOUT FOR
 NEW RTU'S ON THE ROOF. NEITHER THE A OR S PLANS
 INDICATE HOW COMPLIANCE WITH 2014 FBC-B SECTION
 1509.6.4 EQUIPMENT AND APPLIANCES ON ROOFS OR ELEVATED
 STRUCTURES. WHERE EQUIPMENT AND APPLIANCES REQUIRING
 ACCESS ARE INSTALLED ON ROOFS OR ELEVATED STRUCTURES AT
 A HEIGHT EXCEEDING 16 FEET (4877 MM), SUCH ACCESS SHALL
 BE PROVIDED BY A PERMANENT APPROVED MEANS OF ACCESS,
 THE EXTENT OF WHICH SHALL BE FROM GRADE OR FLOOR LEVEL
 TO THE EQUIPMENT AND APPLIANCES? LEVEL SERVICE SPACE.
 SUCH ACCESS SHALL NOT REQUIRE CLIMBING OVER
 OBSTRUCTIONS GREATER THAN 30 INCHES (762 MM) HIGH OR
 WALKING ON ROOFS HAVING A SLOPE GREATER THAN 4 UNITS
 VERTICAL IN 12 UNITS HORIZONTAL (33-PERCENT SLOPE).
 PERMANENT LADDERS INSTALLED TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED
 ACCESS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM DESIGN
 CRITERIA:
 10.1. THE SIDE RAILING SHALL EXTEND ABOVE THE PARAPET
 OR ROOF EDGE NOT LESS THAN 30 INCHES (762 MM).
 10.2. LADDERS SHALL HAVE RUNG SPACING NOT TO EXCEED 14
 INCHES (356 MM) ON CENTER.
 10.3. LADDERS SHALL HAVE A TOE SPACING NOT LESS THAN
 6-INCHES (152 MM) DEEP.
 10.4. THERE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES (457 MM)
 BETWEEN RAILS.
 10.5. RUNGS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 0.75-INCH (19 MM)
 DIAMETER AND BE CAPABLE OF WITHSTANDING A 300-POUND
 (136.1 KG) LOAD.
 10.6. LADDERS OVER 30 FEET (9144 MM) IN HEIGHT SHALL BE
 PROVIDED WITH OFFSET SECTIONS AND LANDINGS CAPABLE OF
 WITHSTANDING 100 POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT (488.2 KG/M2).
 10.7. LADDERS SHALL BE PROTECTED AGAINST CORROSION BY
 APPROVED MEANS. CATWALKS INSTALLED TO PROVIDE THE
 REQUIRED ACCESS SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN 24-INCHES (610
 MM) WIDE AND SHALL HAVE RAILINGS AS REQUIRED FOR
 SERVICE PLATFORMS.
  
 11) ZONING COMMENTS INDICATE THERE MAY HAVE A NEED TO
 SCREEN THE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ON THE ROOF. PLEASE
 SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH ? 1509.6.1 HEIGHT LIMITATIONS.
 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENS SHALL NOT EXCEED 18 FEET
 (5486 MM) IN HEIGHT ABOVE THE ROOF DECK, AS MEASURED TO
 THE HIGHEST POINT ON THE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREEN.
 PLEASE PROVIDE THE ATTACHMENT FOR SCREEN FRAMING AS
 WELL AS THE SCREEN MATERIAL ITSELF, SHOW COMPLIANCE
 WITH 1609.6 WIND DESIGN.
  
 12) WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE
 REVISION & REMOVE ANY VOIDED SHEETS & REPLACE ANY PAGES
 AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL
 REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE
 REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION
 PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO
 EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED
 COOPERATION.
  
 JAMES A. WITMER CBO
 SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 TEL: 561-805-6715
 FAX: 561-805-6676
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
  
  
  
  
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2015-11-24 Cont ID  
Sent By albarran Date 2015-11-24 Time 18:31 Rev Time 0.00
Received By albarran Date 2015-11-24 Time 14:30 Sent To I
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-10-14 Cont ID  
Sent By albarran Date 2015-10-14 Time 09:19 Rev Time 0.00
Received By albarran Date 2015-10-13 Time 18:30 Sent To I
Notes
2015-10-14 10:00:39PLEASE NOTE THAT I, MIKE ALBARRAN, ELECTRICAL PLANS
 EXAMINER HAVE COMPLETED THE ELECTRICAL REVIEW OF THE
 ABOVE MENTIONED JOB. BELOW ARE THE COMMENTS WITH
 REGARDS TO THE REQUIRED CORRECTIONS. THE PLANS SHALL BE
 REVISED TO ADDRESS FOLLOWING ITEMS; ONCE CORRECTED
 SHALL BE RESUBMITTED FOR ANOTHER REVIEW.
 1. FOR THE FUTURE, I DON?T KNOW IF YOU ARE AWARE OF A
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENT TO THE FBC, SECTION
 107 WHICH REQUIRES THAT PLANS BE DRAWN AT NO LESS THAN
 1/8? SCALE. (CITY AMENDMENT 107.2.1.4)
 2. NEC 215.5 REQUIRES THAT YOU SUBMIT A COMPLETE
 FEEDER/RISER DIAGRAM INCLUSIVE OF LOAD CALCS AND
 CONDUCTOR SIZING.
 3. NEC 215.6 REQUIRES THAT THE FEEDER/RISER DIAGRAM BE
 COMPLETE INCLUSIVE OF ALL GROUNDING.
 4. NEC 408.4(A) REQUIRES THAT YOU PROVIDE A CIRCUIT
 DIRECTORY FOR EVERY PANEL. THE CIRCUIT DIRECTORY FOR
 PANEL ?P? DOES NOT MATCH YOUR RISER DIAGRAM WITH
 RELATION TO PANEL ?P2?.
 5. NEC 408.4(B) REQUIRES THAT ALL NON-RESIDENTIAL
 PANELS BE MARKED TO INDICATE THE LOCATION OF ORIGIN OF
 THE POWER TO THE PANEL.
 6. NEC 110.16 REQUIRES THAT ALL PANELS BE MARKED WITH
 AN ARC-FLASH HAZARD WARNING LABEL.
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE
 LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY
 RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. PLEASE, ADDITIONALLY, INSERT
 CORRECTED PAGES INTO TO SUBMITTAL AND LEAVE THE
 PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS.
  
 IF YOU HAVE FURTHER QUESTIONS, PLEASE DON?T HESITATE TO
 CONTACT ME DIRECTLY.
  
 THANK YOU
  
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2015-12-09 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 2015-12-09 Time 15:22 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 2015-12-09 Time 15:22 Sent To  
Notes
2015-12-09 15:22:52EXISTING WATER LINE NEAR REAR OF BUILDING TO BE FIELD
 LOCATED PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. NO CONSTRUCTION
 IS AUTHORIZED OVER WATER LINE.
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2015-11-03 Cont ID  
Sent By scaldero Date 2015-11-03 Time 15:02 Rev Time 0.00
Received By scaldero Date 2015-11-03 Time 14:59 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2015-09-10 Cont ID  
Sent By scaldero Date 2015-09-10 Time 13:13 Rev Time 0.00
Received By scaldero Date 2015-09-10 Time 13:00 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2015-12-09 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2015-12-09 Time 17:58 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date 2015-12-01 Time 10:41 Sent To  
Notes
2015-12-02 10:49:55C31
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2015-11-24 Cont ID  
Sent By albarran Date 2015-11-24 Time 18:34 Rev Time 0.00
Received By albarran Date 2015-10-28 Time 09:48 Sent To  
Notes
2015-11-24 18:34:4711/24/15 PASSED ELECTRICAL REVIEW BUT FAILED THE OTHER
 DISCIPLINES. RUNNER NOTIFIED VIA EMAIL SENT TO LARGE
 DENIED "TBD". MA
2015-10-30 09:49:20C31
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2015-10-14 Cont ID  
Sent By albarran Date 2015-10-14 Time 10:02 Rev Time 0.00
Received By albarran Date 2015-09-04 Time 09:05 Sent To  
Notes
2015-10-14 10:05:2010/14/15 FAILED ELECTRICAL REVIEW. PERMIT RUNNER
 NOTIFIED VIA EMAIL. SENT TO LARGE DENIED BIN "TBD". MA
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2015-12-04 Cont ID  
Sent By ccole Date 2015-12-04 Time 15:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ccole Date 2015-12-04 Time 15:48 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2015-11-06 Cont ID  
Sent By ccole Date 2015-11-06 Time 07:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ccole Date 2015-11-06 Time 06:53 Sent To  
Notes
2015-11-06 08:03:592ND REVIEW: FBC 2014 MECHANICAL
 PERMIT #15090205
 11/6/2015
  
 1) THE HEAT PUMP SCHEDULE ON SHEET M1.1 INDICATES
 OVERSIZING OF COOLING CAPACITY FOR RTU #6, WHEN
 COMPARED WITH THE CALCULATIONS ON SHEET M1.5- REFER TO
 SECTION C403.2.2 FBC-14 ENERGY CONSERVATION.
 2) THE EFFICIENCY RATINGS OF THE NEW HEAT PUMPS (11.8
 EER FOR RTU'S 2-6, AND 13 SEER FOR RTU-1) AS LISTED IN
 THE RE-SUBMITTED ENERGY CALCS DO NOT MATCH THE RATINGS
 LISTED IN THE SCHEDULE- (10.6 & 11.2 EER). A) THE
 REQUIRED INPUT DATA REPORT WAS NOT SUBMITTED WITH THE
 REVISED CALCULATION FORM 506-2014, AND THE MANDATORY
 REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST WAS NOT CHECKED OFF.
 B) PLEASE NOTE THAT DUPLICATE COPIES OF THE ENERGY CODE
 SUBMITTALS ARE REQUIRED- ONLY ONE FORM WAS SUBMITTED.
 3) SHEET M1.2, ROOFTOP UNIT DETAIL: PLEASE SHOW A DUCT
 SMOKE DETECTOR IN THE RETURN PLENUM OF THE RTU- SECTION
 606.2.1 FBC-14 MECHANICAL.
 4) COMMENT #10 FROM THE 1ST REVIEW REGARDING PERMIT
 VALUATION STILL EXISTS: PLEASE COMPLY.
  
 CHRISTOPHER L. COLE
 MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER
 561-805-6719
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-09-15 Cont ID  
Sent By ccole Date 2015-09-15 Time 11:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ccole Date 2015-09-15 Time 11:10 Sent To  
Notes
2015-09-15 12:01:161ST REVIEW: FBC 2014 MECHANICAL
 PERMIT #15090205
 9/15/15
  
 1) NEW RTU'S ARE SPECIFIED ON THE PLANS- PLEASE REFER
 TO SECTION C403.2.1 FBC-14 ENERGY CONSERVATION AND
 PROVIDE COOLING AND HEATING LOAD CALCULATIONS:
 CALCULATION OF HEATING AND COOLING LOADS.
 DESIGN LOADS SHALL BE DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 PROCEDURES DESCRIBED IN THE ASHRAE/ACCA STANDARD 183 OR
 ACCA MANUAL N AND SHALL BE ATTACHED TO THE CODE
 COMPLIANCE FORM SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT
 WHEN THE BUILDING IS PERMITTED OR, IN THE EVENT THE
 MECHANICAL PERMIT IS OBTAINED AT A LATER TIME, THE
 SIZING CALCULATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE
 APPLICATION FOR THE MECHANICAL PERMIT. HEATING AND
 COOLING LOADS SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO ACCOUNT FOR LOAD
 REDUCTIONS THAT ARE ACHIEVED WHEN ENERGY RECOVERY
 SYSTEMS ARE UTILIZED IN THE HVAC SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE
 WITH THE ASHRAEHVAC SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT HANDBOOK.
 ALTERNATIVELY, DESIGN LOADS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY AN
 APPROVED EQUIVALENT COMPUTATION PROCEDURE, USING THE
 DESIGN PARAMETERS SPECIFIED IN CHAPTER 3.
 2) THE SUBMITTED ENERGY COMPLIANCE FORM 504-2014 DOES
 NOT LIST ANY DATA FOR THE NEW AC SYSTEMS. PLEASE ADD
 THE REQUIRED DATA AND COMPLETE THE MANDATORY
 REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST- PLACE A CHECK IN THE YES, N/A,
 OR EX BOX ON EACH LINE.
 3) SHEET M1.0: DUCT SMOKE DETECTORS SHALL BE INSTALLED
 IN THE RETURN AIR SYSTEMS OF THE NEW RTU'S- SEE SECTION
 606.2.1 FBC-14 MECHANCIAL.
 3A) M1.2 DUCT DETECTOR DETAIL: PLACE A NOTE INDICATING
 ALL RTU'S ARE TO BE SHUT DOWN UPON ANY DUCT DETECTOR
 GOING INTO ALARM.
 4) M1.1: REVIEW AND REVISE THE VENTILATION SCHEDULE TO
 INDICATE COMPLIANCE WITH TABLE 403.3 FBC-14 MECHANICAL.
 PLEASE REMOVE THE NOTES SPECIFYING THE IMC.
 5) M1.0 & M1.1: PROVIDE A DUCT LAYOUT PLAN ON SHEET
 M1.0 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SCHEDULES SHOWN ON SHEET
 M1.1.
 6) A2.0, S5.1, & M1.2: REFER TO SECTION 301.15 FBC-14
 MECHANICAL AND PROVIDE WIND LOAD TIE DOWN ENGINEERING
 FOR THE ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT AND COMPONENTS. INDICATE ON
 THE PLANS THE WIND LOAD DESIGN CRITERIA, DESIGN
 PRESSURES, AND DETAILS FOR ATTACHMENT OF THE RTU AND
 FAN CURBS TO THE ROOF STRUCTURE, AND RTU'S AND FANS TO
 THE CURBS.
 7) S5.1: PROVIDE STRUCTURAL DETAILS FOR COVERING THE
 ROOF OPENINGS OF THE REMOVED RTU'S (WHERE APPLICABLE).
 8) PROVIDE A CONDENSATE DISPOSAL PLAN- INDICATE THE
 TYPE AND SIZE OF RTU CONDENSATE PIPES, SHOW THE PIPE
 RUNS, SHOW HOW THE PIPE WILL BE SUPPORTED AND PROTECTED
 FROM UV DEGRADATION, AND INDICATE THE DISCHARGE
 LOCATIONS- REFER TO SECTION 307 FBC-14 MECHANICAL.
 9) M1.1: IN REGARD TO THE NEW AC SYSTEMS AND
 ECONOMIZERS PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING
 SECTIONS OF THE FBC-14 ENERGY CONSERVATION:
 A) C403.2.5.1 DEMAND CONTROLLED VENTILATION.
 DEMAND CONTROL VENTILATION (DCV) SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR
 SPACES LARGER THAN 500 SQUARE FEET (50 M2) AND WITH AN
 AVERAGE OCCUPANT LOAD OF 25 PEOPLE PER 1000 SQUARE FEET
 (93 M2) OF FLOOR AREA (AS ESTABLISHED IN TABLE 403.3 OF
 THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, MECHANICAL) AND SERVED BY
 SYSTEMS WITH ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING:
 1. AN AIR-SIDE ECONOMIZER;
 2. AUTOMATIC MODULATING CONTROL OF THE OUTDOOR AIR
 DAMPER; OR
 3. A DESIGN OUTDOOR AIRFLOW GREATER THAN 3,000 CFM
 (1400 L/S).
 EXCEPTION: DEMAND CONTROL VENTILATION IS NOT REQUIRED
 FOR SYSTEMS AND SPACES AS FOLLOWS:
 1. SYSTEMS WITH ENERGY RECOVERY COMPLYING WITH SECTION
 C403.2.6.
 2. MULTIPLE-ZONE SYSTEMS WITHOUT DIRECT DIGITAL CONTROL
 OF INDIVIDUAL ZONES COMMUNICATING WITH A CENTRAL
 CONTROL PANEL.
 3. SYSTEM WITH A DESIGN OUTDOOR AIRFLOW LESS THAN 1,200
 CFM (600 L/S).
 4. SPACES WHERE THE SUPPLY AIRFLOW RATE MINUS ANY
 MAKEUP OR OUTGOING TRANSFER AIR REQUIREMENT IS LESS
 THAN 1,200 CFM (600 L/S).
 5. VENTILATION PROVIDED FOR PROCESS LOADS ONLY.
 B) C403.3.1.1 AIR ECONOMIZERS.
 AIR ECONOMIZERS SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTIONS C403.3.1.1.1
 THROUGH C403.3.1.1.4.
 C403.3.1.1.1 DESIGN CAPACITY.
 AIR ECONOMIZER SYSTEMS SHALL BE CAPABLE OF MODULATING
 OUTDOOR AIR AND RETURN AIR DAMPERS TO PROVIDE UP TO 100
 PERCENT OF THE DESIGN SUPPLY AIR QUANTITY AS OUTDOOR
 AIR FOR COOLING.
 C403.3.1.1.2 CONTROL SIGNAL.
 ECONOMIZER DAMPERS SHALL BE CAPABLE OF BEING SEQUENCED
 WITH THE MECHANICAL COOLING EQUIPMENT AND SHALL NOT BE
 CONTROLLED BY ONLY MIXED AIR TEMPERATURE.
 EXCEPTION: THE USE OF MIXED AIR TEMPERATURE LIMIT
 CONTROL SHALL BE PERMITTED FOR SYSTEMS CONTROLLED FROM
 SPACE TEMPERATURE (SUCH AS SINGLE-ZONE SYSTEMS).
 C403.3.1.1.3 HIGH-LIMIT SHUTOFF.
 AIR ECONOMIZERS SHALL BE CAPABLE OF AUTOMATICALLY
 REDUCING OUTDOOR AIR INTAKE TO THE DESIGN MINIMUM
 OUTDOOR AIR QUANTITY WHEN OUTDOOR AIR INTAKE WILL NO
 LONGER REDUCE COOLING ENERGY USAGE. HIGH-LIMIT SHUTOFF
 CONTROL TYPES FOR SPECIFIC CLIMATES SHALL BE CHOSEN
 FROM TABLE C403.3.1.1.3(1). HIGH-LIMIT SHUTOFF CONTROL
 SETTINGS FOR THESE CONTROL TYPES SHALL BE THOSE
 SPECIFIED IN TABLE C403.3.1.1.3(2).
 TABLE C403.3.1.1.3(1) HIGH-LIMIT SHUTOFF CONTROL
 OPTIONS FOR AIR ECONOMIZERS- NOTE: PER THIS TABLE IN A
 1A CLIMATE ZONE THE ALLOWABLE CONTROL TYPES ARE FIXED
 DRY BULB, DIFFERENTIAL DRY BULB, ELECTRONIC ENTHALPYA,
 DIFFERENTIAL ENTHALPY, DEW-POINT AND DRY-BULB
 TEMPERATURES. PLEASE INDICATE WHICH TYPE THE LENNOX
 UNITS ARE INCORPORATING.
 10) THE $90,000.00 PROJECT COST LISTED ON THE PERMIT
 APPLICATION IS UNDERVALUED FOR THE SCOPE OF THE WORK
 SHOWN ON THE PLANS. REFER TO 109.3 WPB AMENDMENTS TO
 THE FBC-14 AND ADJUST THE PERMIT VALUE ACCORDINGLY.
 109.3 BUILDING PERMIT VALUATIONS. IF, IN THE OPINION OF
 THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, THE CLAIMED VALUATION OF
 BUILDING, ALTERATION, STRUCTURE, ELECTRICAL, GAS,
 MECHANICAL OR PLUMBING SYSTEMS APPEARS TO BE
 UNDERESTIMATED ON THE APPLICATION, THE PERMIT SHALL BE
 DENIED, UNLESS THE APPLICANT CAN SHOW
 DETAILED, QUANTITY ESTIMATES, AND/OR BONA FIDE SIGNED
 CONTRACTS (EXCLUDING LAND VALUE) TO MEET THE
 APPROVAL OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. FOR PERMITTING
 PURPOSES, VALUATION OF BUILDINGS AND SYSTEMS SHALL
 BE TOTAL REPLACEMENT VALUE TO INCLUDE STRUCTURAL,
 ELECTRIC, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, INTERIOR FINISH,
 RELATIVE SITE WORK, ARCHITECTURAL AND DESIGN FEES,
 MARKETING COSTS, OVERHEAD AND PROFIT; EXCLUDING
 ONLY LAND VALUE. VALUATION REFERENCES MAY INCLUDE THE
 LATEST PUBLISHED DATA OF NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION
 COST ANALYSIS SERVICES (MARSHALL-SWIFT, MEANS, ETC.),
 AS PUBLISHED BY INTERNATIONAL CODE CONGRESS.
 FINAL BUILDING PERMIT VALUATION SHALL BE SET BY THE
 BUILDING OFFICIAL.
  
 CHRISTOPHER L. COLE
 MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER
 561-805-6719
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2015-09-26 Cont ID  
Sent By tklarge Date 2015-09-26 Time 11:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tklarge Date 2015-09-26 Time 10:50 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2015-12-08 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 2015-12-07 Time 07:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 2015-12-07 Time 07:41 Sent To  
Notes
2015-12-08 07:43:391.) SEPARATE PERMIT REQUIRED FOR SIGNAGE.
  
 REFERENCE: PB 1520K - MINOR DSI AMENDMENT TO ADD
 LOADING PLATFORM.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2015-11-04 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 2015-11-04 Time 16:24 Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 2015-11-04 Time 16:24 Sent To  
Notes
2015-11-04 16:29:13** FAILED **
  
 1.) APPROVAL FOR THE MINOR DSI AMENDMENT REQUIRED.
 MINOR DSI APPLICATION IS PENDING WITH THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION. ADDITIONAL
 INFORMATION FOR THE DSI APPLICATION WAS REQUESTED BY
 STAFF ON 11/2/15 FOR THE MINOR DSI AMENDMENT REVIEW
 (SPOKE TO APPLICANT, RACHEL SANCHEZ ON 11/3/15).
  
 CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE
 QUESTIONS.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-09-21 Cont ID  
Sent By dkittred Date 2015-09-21 Time 10:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 2015-09-18 Time 14:31 Sent To  
Notes
2015-09-21 10:54:30** FAILED **
  
 PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS. RESPOND TO THE
 COMMENTS IN WRITING AND/OR ON THE PLANS WHERE
 APPLICABLE:
  
 1.) THE PROPERTY IS A DEVELOPMENT OF SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
 (DSI). ANY CHANGES TO THE SITE WILL REQUIRE AN
 AMENDMENT TO THE DSI SITE PLAN. SINCE THE PLANS
 INDICATE THAT A NEW CONCRETE AND RECEIVING PAD AT THE
 REAR OF THE BUILDING (NORTH SIDE) IS BEING PROPOSED, A
 MINOR DSI AMENDMENT IS REQUIRED.
  
 2.) IS THERE EXISTING PARKING WHERE THE PROPOSED
 CONCRETE AND RECEIVING PAD WILL BE LOCATED? THE LATEST
 SITE PLAN FOR THE PLAZA SEEMS TO INDICATE SO. IF
 PARKING SPACES ARE TO BE REMOVED IN ORDER TO
 ACCOMMODATE THE CONCRETE AND RECEIVING PAD AT THE REAR
 OF THE BUILDING, THEN THE APPLICANT WILL BE REQUIRED TO
 DEMONSTRATE HOW THE REQUIRED PARKING FOR THE ENTIRE
 SHOPPING PLAZA WILL BE UNAFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED
 CHANGES. AN UPDATED SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY WILL BE
 REQUIRED WITH THE REVISED SITE PLAN.
  
 3.) THE APPLICATION FOR A MINOR DSI AMENDMENT CAN BE
 FOUND ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE, FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTP:
 //WPB.ORG/PLANNING/WP-CONTENT/UPLOADS/SITES/37/2013/04/
 2015-DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION-REVISED-06.17.2015.PDF
  
 4.) SEPARATE PERMIT APPLICATION AND REVIEW REQUIRED FOR
 SIGNAGE.
  
 5.) ALL ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SCREEN FROM VIEW BY
 THE PARAPET OR BY A STRUCTURAL SCREEN.
  
 PLEASE CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF YOU HAVE
 QUESTIONS.
  
2015-09-10 12:40:209/10/15


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved