Plan Review Details - Permit 15090199
Plan Review Stops For Permit 15090199
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2016-03-07 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2016-03-07 Time 16:14 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2016-03-07 Time 16:14 Sent To  
Notes
2016-03-07 16:50:12****PROVISO****
 ****REVISION REQUIRED SUBJECT TO FIELD INSPECTOR'S
 DISCRETION****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 A BUCK DETAIL IS REQUIRED. WINDOW AND DOOR INSTALLATION
 METHOD PROPOSED IS NOT CLEAR AS THE BUCK SPEC WAS NOT
 PROVIDED, AND THE PRODUCT APPROVALS DO NOT INCLUDE
 STEEL SUBSTRATE. A REVISION (STRUCTURAL BUCK
 SPECIFICATION OR ENGINEERED WINDOW INSTALLATION INTO
 STEEL SUBSTRATE) MAY BE REQUIRED SUBJECT TO INSPECTOR'S
 DISCRETION.
  
 THE WALL DETAIL STUCCO SPECIFICATION IS NOT IN
 COMPLIANCE WITH FBC 5TH EDITION RESIDENTIAL 703.6. NO
 BARRIER IS SHOWN BETWEEN THE STUCCO AND PLYWOOD, NOT
 CLEAR WHETHER OR NOT A BOND BREAK IS PROPOSED. PROVISO;
 VAPOR BARRIER AND PAPERBACK LATHE REQUIRED BETWEEN
 PLYWOOD SHEATHING AND STUCCO. DEVIATION FROM THIS
 SPECIFICATION MAY REQUIRE A REVISION, SUBJECT TO THE
 INSPECTOR'S DISCRETION.
  
 BASED ON THE STRUCTURAL DETAIL FOR THE WALL, IT APPEARS
 THAT A STRUCTURAL MULLION MAY BE REQUIRED. PRIOR TO
 INSPECTION, HIGHLIGHT THE PROPOSED INSTALLATION METHOD
 FOR THE WINDOW AND DOOR. IF A MULLION IS REQUIRED,
 PROVIDE AT INSPECTION WITH THE INSTALLATION DETAILS
 HIGHLIGHTED. SUBJECT TO INSPECTOR'S DISCRETION, A
 REVISION MAY BE REQUIRED.
  
  
  
  

Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2016-02-03 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2016-02-11 Time 13:59 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2016-02-03 Time 13:53 Sent To E
Notes
2016-02-03 13:59:25****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS LIST NOT ADDRESSED.
 PAGES/DETAILS FROM PRESCRIPTIVE DESIGN NOT PROVIDED
 (SEE SUGGESTIONS IN PLAN REVIEW), CALCULATIONS TO
 JUSTIFY THE DESIGN PROPOSED NOT PROVIDED, AND
 STRUCTURAL FRAMING DETAILS REQUESTED WERE NOT PROVIDED.
 PLEASE DO NOT RESUBMIT WITHOUT THIS INFORMATION.
 (CALCULATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED ONLY IF ASCE7-10 IS USED
 FOR DESIGN - AT THIS POINT, APPLICANT HAS ELECTED TO
 USE A PRESCRIPTIVE DESIGN. IF THIS CHANGES TO ASCE7-10,
 BE ADVISED THAT CALCULATIONS TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE
 PROPOSED DESIGN COMPLIES WITH THE WIND DESIGN STATED
 MAY BE REQUIRED.)
  
 1. PLAN TO INCLUDE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA FBC 5TH ED.
 RESIDENTIAL 301.
  
 EXPOSURE STATED IS B, THIS IS EXPOSURE C, SEE AERIALS
 AND DEFINITION IN ASCE7 10.
  
 WIND SPEED NOT CLEAR; 250MPH AND 175 MPH STATED. ONE
 WIND SPEED TO BE APPLICABLE. COMPLIANCE WITH WIND
 DESIGN CRITERIA STATED WILL BE REQUIRED. 170MPH,
 EXPOSURE C, IMPORTANCE FACTOR II APPEARS TO BE
 APPLICABLE FOR THIS PROJECT.
  
 DESIGNER HAS DECLARED IMPORTANCE FACTOR I. THIS DOES
 NOT APPEAR APPROPRIATE AS, ONCE FULLY ENCLOSED, FAILURE
 OF THE DESIGN WILL BE HARMFUL TO ANYONE IN THE
 STRUCTURE. IT IS SUGESTED TO DESIGN TO IMPORTANCE
 FACTOR II OR PROVIDE RATIONALE (FOR IMPORTANCE FACTOR
 I) FOR BUILDING OFFICIAL CONSIDERATION. IF APPLICANT
 WISHES TO DESIGN TO IMPORTANCE FACTOR I, THAT RATIONALE
 IS TO BE SENT VIA EMAIL AND APPROVED PRIOR TO
 RESUBMITTAL.
  
 METHOD OF DESIGN NOT STATED. PRESCRIPTIVE IS NOT A
 DESIGN METHOD. SEE FBC 5TH EDITION RESIDENTIAL 301 FOR
 THE PRESCRIPTIVE OPTIONS AVAILABLE. IT APPEARS THAT
 THIS IS STEEL, SO THE STEEL PRESCRIPTIVE METHOD WOULD
 LIKELY BE APPLICABLE (AISI S230 07/S2 08).
  
 IF A PRESCRIPTIVE METHOD IS USED, PROVIDE DETAILS FROM
 THE PRESCRIPTIVE GUIDE. THIS STANDARD APPEARS TO BE
 AVAILABLE FOR FREE ON THE INTERNET. THIS IS NOT A
 GUARANTEE THAT THE WIND SPEED APPLICABLE FOR OUR AREA
 AND DESIGN SPECIFIC TO YOUR PROJECT, BUT IT IS
 SUGGESTED THAT YOU INVESTIGATE THIS GUIDE FOR DESIGN TO
 OBTAIN THE REQUIRED DETAILS.
  
 A STRUCTURAL FRAMING DETAIL IS REQUIRED.
  
 A BUCK DETAIL IS REQUIRED. A DETAIL WAS PROVIDED BUT
 BUCK SPECIFICATION NOT PROVIDED.
  
 A SPECIFICATION FOR FASTENING INTO FLOOR AND COLUMN,
 BUT NOT THE HEADER, AND IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW THIS DESIGN
 WAS DETERMINED AND HOW DESIGNER HAS DETERMINED THAT
 THIS MEETS THE WIND RESISTANCE REQUIREMENTS.
  
 BUCK STRUCTURAL SPECIFICATION WAS NOT PROVIDED). FBC
 5TH ED RESIDENTIAL 301.
  
 ELEVATION INFORMATION WAS NOT PROVIDED (RELATIVE TO
 FINISHED FLOOR IN EXISTING STRUCTURE, RELATIVE TO
 GRADE); PLEASE INCLUDE ON REVISED PLANS. THE PLAN
 STATES THAT THE EXISTING GRADE WILL NOT CHANGE AND THAT
 THE FLOOR WOULD REMAIN. SEE FBC 5TH EDITION RESIDENTIAL
 318.7, 6 INCHES REQUIRED BETWEEN THE EXTERIOR WALL
 COVERINGS AND FINAL EARTH GRADE. PROVIDE A DETAIL WHICH
 SHOWS COMPLIANCE. IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THE FINISHED
 FLOOR ELEVATION WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE RAISED (BUT NOT
 POSSIBLE TO DETERMINE AT THIS TIME DUE TO LACK OF
 INFORMATION).
  
 THE WALL DETAIL STUCCO SPECIFICATION IS NOT IN
 COMPLIANCE WITH FBC 5TH EDITION RESIDENTIAL 703.6. NO
 BARRIER IS SHOWN BETWEEN THE STUCCO AND PLYWOOD, NOT
 CLEAR WHETHER OR NOT A BOND BREAK IS PROPOSED, NUMBER
 OF STUCCO COATS NOT STATED. A COMPLETE REVIEW OF THE
 STUCCO SPEC WILL BE DONE WHEN SUBMITTED (AT THIS TIME
 NOT SURE IF THE THICKNESS PROPOSED COMPLIES WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM C 926 AND ASTM C 1063).
  
 SEE FBC 5TH EDITION EXISTING BUILDING CODE SECTION
 301.1, REVISE PLAN TO INDICATE METHOD OF COMPLIANCE
 SELECTED.
  
 REVISE PLAN TO SHOW ROOMS WHICH OPEN INTO THE PROPOSED
 ENCLOSED PORCH (PROVIDE ROOM DESIGNATIONS SUCH AS
 LIVING ROOM, KITCHEN, BEDROOM). IF BEDROOMS ARE
 AFFECTED, PLEASE ADVISE AS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WILL
 BE REQUIRED.
  
  
  
  
  
  

Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2015-11-03 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2015-11-03 Time 08:50 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2015-11-03 Time 08:50 Sent To  
Notes
2015-11-03 08:54:52****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 FROM PREVIOUS LIST:
  
 1. PLAN TO INCLUDE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA FBC 5TH ED.
 RESIDENTIAL 301. THIS IS TO INCLUDE WIND SPEED, RISK
 CATEGORY, EXPOSURE CLASSIFICATION, AND METHOD OF
 DESIGN. IF A PRESCRIPTIVE METHOD IS USED, PROVIDE
 DETAILS FROM THE PRESCRIPTIVE GUIDE. IF ENGINEERING IS
 USED (ASCE7-10), PROVIDE CALCULATIONS. PLANS TO INCLUDE
 ALL STRUCTURAL INFORMATION (AND, IF NOT SEALED BY A
 DESIGN PROFESSIONAL, CALCULATIONS AS APPLICABLE) AND
 ADEQUATE INFORMATION ABOUT THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT. NO
 ELEVATION INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED (RELATIVE TO
 FINISHED FLOOR IN EXISTING STRUCTURE, RELATIVE TO
 GRADE); PLEASE INCLUDE ON REVISED PLANS.
  
 A STRUCTURAL FRAMING DETAIL IS REQUIRED. IT APPEARS
 THAT METAL FRAMING IS PROPOSED; IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW THE
 IMPACT WINDOWS WILL BE INSTALLED (DIRECTLY INTO
 FRAMING? INTO BUCKS? NO BUCK DETAIL PROVIDED). FBC 5TH
 ED RESIDENTIAL 301.
  
 2. FLORIDA STATE OR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL REQUIRED FOR
 COMPONENTS AND CLADDING, FAC9N-3, FBC 5TH ED.
 RESIDENTIAL 301. A WINDOW PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS
 PROVIDED, BUT I COULD NOT LOCATE A DOOR PRODUCT
 APPROVAL. (I DID NOT GO THROUGH EVERY PAGE PROVIDED AS
 THERE WERE ABOUT 50 8.5"X11" SPEC SHEETS PROVIDED WHICH
 ARE NOT NEEDED FOR PLAN REVIEW).
  
 2ND REVIEW, NOT ADDRESSED. IT APPEARS THAT IMPACT
 WINDOWS ARE PROPOSED. PRODUCT APPROVALS NOT PROVIDED.
  
 3. WHEN RESUBMITTING, PROVIDE TWO COMPLETE COLLATED
 SETS OF PLANS FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE.

Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-09-19 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2015-09-19 Time 12:18 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2015-09-19 Time 12:18 Sent To E
Notes
2015-09-19 12:31:11****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 1. MANY UNNUMBERED 8.5"X11" PAGES WERE SUBMITTED. SPEC
 SHEETS FOR EACH COMPONENT OF THE PROJECT ARE NOT
 REQUIRED. PLANS ARE TO BE ARCHITECTURAL QUALITY, TO
 SCALE, PLEASE SEE FBC 107.2.1:
  
 107.2.1 INFORMATION ON CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS.
 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 DIMENSIONED AND DRAWN UPON SUITABLE MATERIAL.
 ELECTRONIC MEDIA DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED WHEN APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL.
 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT
 CLARITY TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE AND EXTENT OF
 THE WORK PROPOSED AND SHOW IN
 DETAIL THAT IT WILL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS
 CODE AND RELEVANT LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES
 AND REGULATIONS, AS DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING
 OFFICIAL. SUCH DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHALL
 CONTAIN INFORMATION, IN THE FORM OF NOTES OR OTHERWISE,
 AS TO THE QUALITY OF MATERIALS, WHERE
 QUALITY IS ESSENTIAL TO CONFORMITY WITH THE TECHNICAL
 CODES. SUCH INFORMATION SHALL BE SPECIFIC,
 AND THE TECHNICAL CODES SHALL NOT BE CITED AS A WHOLE
 OR IN PART, NOR SHALL THE TERM "LEGAL" OR
 ITS EQUIVALENT BE USED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR SPECIFIC
 INFORMATION. ALL INFORMATION, DRAWINGS,
 SPECIFICATIONS AND ACCOMPANYING DATA SHALL BEAR THE
 NAME AND SIGNATURE OF THE PERSON
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN. (SEE ALSO SECTION 107.3.5).
  
 2. PLAN TO INCLUDE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA FBC 5TH ED.
 RESIDENTIAL 301. THIS IS TO INCLUDE WIND SPEED, RISK
 CATEGORY, EXPOSURE CLASSIFICATION, AND METHOD OF
 DESIGN. IF A PRESCRIPTIVE METHOD IS USED, PROVIDE
 DETAILS FROM THE PRESCRIPTIVE GUIDE. IF ENGINEERING IS
 USED (ASCE7-10), PROVIDE CALCULATIONS. PLANS TO INCLUDE
 ALL STRUCTURAL INFORMATION (AND, IF NOT SEALED BY A
 DESIGN PROFESSIONAL, CALCULATIONS AS APPLICABLE) AND
 ADEQUATE INFORMATION ABOUT THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT. NO
 ELEVATION INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED (RELATIVE TO
 FINISHED FLOOR IN EXISTING STRUCTURE, RELATIVE TO
 GRADE); PLEASE INCLUDE ON REVISED PLANS.
  
 3. PROVIDE A FLOOR PLAN TO SHOW IF ANY SLEEPING
 ROOMS/EMERGENCY MEANS OF ESCAPE AND RESCUE ARE AFFECTED
 BY THE PROPOSED RENOVATION, FBC 107, FBC R310, FBC EB
 704.1.
  
 4. WINDOW PRODUCT APPROVALS PROVIDED ARE NON IMPACT.
 IMPACT PROTECTION REQUIRED, FBC R 301.2.1.2. PROVIDE
 PRODUCT APPROVALS AND, IF SHUTTERS ARE USED, COMPLETE
 THE SAMPLE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE (AVAILABLE IN THE
 LOBBY AND AT:
  
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEVELOPMENT/WP-CONTENT/UPLOADS/SITES/33/
 2013/09/SCHEDULE_FOR_INSTALLATION.PDF
  
 5. IT APPEARS THAT THE EXISTING SUNROOM IS BEING
 CONVERTED TO HABITABLE SPACE. REVISE FLOOR PLAN TO
 PROVIDE A ROOM DESIGNATION, FBC 107. IMPACT FEE
 ASSESSMENT BY PALM BEACH COUNTY MAY BE REQUIRED.
  
 6. FLORIDA STATE OR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL REQUIRED FOR
 COMPONENTS AND CLADDING, FAC9N-3, FBC 5TH ED.
 RESIDENTIAL 301. A WINDOW PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS
 PROVIDED, BUT I COULD NOT LOCATE A DOOR PRODUCT
 APPROVAL. (I DID NOT GO THROUGH EVERY PAGE PROVIDED AS
 THERE WERE ABOUT 50 8.5"X11" SPEC SHEETS PROVIDED WHICH
 ARE NOT NEEDED FOR PLAN REVIEW).
  
 7. A COMPLETE PLAN REVIEW CANNOT BE DONE AT THIS TIME,
 FBC 107. OTHER REVIEWS (SUCH AS MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL)
 AND INFORMATION (ENERGY CALCS) MAY BE REQUIRED AFTER
 SCOPE IS CLARIFIED.
  
  
  

Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2016-03-03 Cont ID  
Sent By albarran Date 2016-03-03 Time 12:05 Rev Time 0.00
Received By albarran Date 2016-03-03 Time 11:51 Sent To B
Notes
2016-03-03 12:45:31ALL PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED DEFICIENCIES HAVE BEEN
 SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. FILE ROUTED TO BLDG MISC. 1

Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2016-02-16 Cont ID  
Sent By albarran Date 2016-02-16 Time 11:40 Rev Time 0.00
Received By albarran Date 2016-02-16 Time 11:15 Sent To  
Notes
2016-02-16 11:42:19THE PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS HAVE NOT
 BEEN PROVIDE. THIS WILL NOT BE APPROVED UNTIL SUCH TIME
 AS ELECTRICAL COMPLIANCE IS ACCOMPLISHED. CONTACT WAS
 MADE W/MR. RYAN. HE WAS INFORMED THAT THE CLOSED IN
 ROOM HAS MINIMUM ELECTRICAL REQUIREMENTS WHICH HAVE TO
 BE MET. HE CLAIMS THAT THERE IS EXISTING ELECTRIC AND I
 TOLD HIM TO MARK THE DRAWINGS WITH THE ELECTRICAL THAT
 EXISTS AND IF COMPLIANT I WILL APPROVE THE PLANS.
 OTHERWISE THE ELECTRICAL WILL HAVE TO BE MADE
 COMPLIANT.

Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2015-11-05 Cont ID  
Sent By ppetty Date 2015-11-05 Time 12:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ppetty Date 2015-11-05 Time 12:38 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-09-29 Cont ID  
Sent By albarran Date 2015-09-29 Time 17:23 Rev Time 0.00
Received By albarran Date 2015-09-29 Time 17:06 Sent To I
Notes
2015-09-29 17:33:35PLEASE NOTE THAT I, MIKE ALBARRAN, ELECTRICAL PLANS
 EXAMINER HAVE COMPLETED THE ELECTRICAL REVIEW OF THE
 ABOVE MENTIONED JOB. BELOW ARE THE COMMENTS WITH
 REGARDS TO THE REQUIRED CORRECTIONS. THE PLANS SHALL BE
 REVISED TO ADDRESS FOLLOWING ITEMS; ONCE CORRECTED
 SHALL BE RESUBMITTED FOR ANOTHER REVIEW.
 1. YOU SHALL SUBMIT A COMPLETE ELECTRICAL DRAWING WITH
 PROPER OUTLET SPACING AS REQUIRED BY NEC 210.52
 2. YOU SHALL INCLUDE THE REQUIRED LIGHTING AS PER NEC
 210.70
 3. SEE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC
 SECTION 107 FOR FURTHER DETAILS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR
 YOUR DRAWINGS.
 4. ENCLOSING THIS ROOM WITH STRUCTURAL MEMBERS CONVERTS
 THIS INTO HABITABLE SPACE. YOU SHALL PROVIDE SUPPORTING
 DOCUMENTS OR ADJUST YOUR VALUATION ACCORDINGLY.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE
 LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY
 RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. PLEASE, ADDITIONALLY, INSERT
 CORRECTED PAGES INTO TO SUBMITTAL AND LEAVE THE
 PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS.
  
 IF YOU HAVE FURTHER QUESTIONS, PLEASE DON?T HESITATE TO
 CONTACT ME DIRECTLY.
  
 THANK YOU
  

Review Stop HIST HISTORICAL
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2016-03-03 Cont ID  
Sent By fmittner Date 2016-03-03 Time 09:57 Rev Time 0.00
Received By fmittner Date 2016-03-03 Time 09:57 Sent To B
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop HIST HISTORICAL
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2016-01-27 Cont ID  
Sent By fmittner Date 2016-01-27 Time 14:21 Rev Time 0.00
Received By fmittner Date 2016-01-27 Time 14:21 Sent To B
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop HIST HISTORICAL
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2015-11-02 Cont ID  
Sent By cpuell Date 2015-11-05 Time 14:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By fmittner Date 2015-11-02 Time 10:07 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop HIST HISTORICAL
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2015-09-10 Cont ID  
Sent By fmittner Date 2015-09-10 Time 09:23 Rev Time 0.00
Received By fmittner Date 2015-09-10 Time 09:23 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2016-03-07 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2016-03-07 Time 16:50 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2016-02-25 Time 09:43 Sent To  
Notes
2016-03-03 10:32:213/3 TO ELEC BOX
  
  
2016-02-26 09:43:47RESUB ROUTED TO FMITTNER VIA ZONING INBOX

Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2016-02-16 Cont ID  
Sent By albarran Date 2016-02-16 Time 11:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By albarran Date 2016-01-22 Time 12:00 Sent To  
Notes
2016-02-16 11:52:532/16/16 FAILED ELECTRICAL REVIEW. DUE TO LACK OF EMAIL
 ADDRESS, CONTRACT WAS MADE WITH BILL RYAN. I EXPLAINED
 TO HIM THAT THIS CLOSED ROOM REQUIRES OUTLETS AND
 LIGHTING. HE WILL CORRECT DRAWINGS AND RESUBMIT. FILE
 SENT TO SMALL "R". MA
2016-02-11 11:22:582/11 TO ELEC BOX
  
  
2016-02-03 13:51:362/3 TO SAK DESK
  
  
2016-01-25 12:01:48RESUB ROUTED TO FMITTNER VIA SGRAHAM'S DESK

Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2015-11-05 Cont ID  
Sent By cpuell Date 2015-11-05 Time 14:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cpuell Date 2015-10-28 Time 15:08 Sent To HIST
Notes
2015-11-03 08:55:0711/3 TO ELEC BOX
  

Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2015-09-29 Cont ID  
Sent By albarran Date 2015-09-29 Time 17:45 Rev Time  
Received By albarran Date 2015-09-04 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2015-09-29 17:39:069/29/15 FAILED ELECTRICAL REVIEW AS WELL AS OTHER
 TRADES. OWNER NOTIFIED VIA EMAIL. SENT TO SMALL DENIED
 BIN "R". MA
2015-09-19 12:42:039/19 TO ELEC BOX
  
2015-09-04 15:28:23ZONING (PER CONV W/F MITTNER OK TO ROUTE TO ZONING BOX
 FOR HISTORIC REVIEW)

Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2015-09-10 Cont ID  
Sent By fmittner Date 2015-09-10 Time 09:23 Rev Time 0.00
Received By fmittner Date 2015-09-10 Time 09:23 Sent To B
Notes
***NONE***


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved