|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 15081038
| Plan Review Stops For Permit 15081038 |
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-01-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
2016-01-26 |
Time |
16:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
2016-01-07 |
Time |
10:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-01-07 10:13:06 | RESUB ROUTED TO LLOUIE VIA SGRAHAM'S DESK |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-09-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-09-14 |
Time |
16:10 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-08-26 15:27:47 | ZONING |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-01-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
2016-01-26 |
Time |
16:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
2016-01-13 |
Time |
16:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-01-13 16:03:08 | MET WITH SIGN CONTRACTOR, DAN GITTERE, ON 1/15/16 TO | | | DISCUSS ZONING'S OUTSTANDING COMMENTS. CONTRACTOR WAS | | | EXPECTED TO RESUBMIT CORRECTED PLANS ON 1/19/16; | | | HOWEVER, REVISED PLANS WAS NOT RECEIVED UNTIL 1/26/15. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-09-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
2015-09-14 |
Time |
10:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
2015-09-14 |
Time |
10:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-09-14 10:11:04 | ** FAILED ** | | | | | | PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS. RESPOND TO THE | | | COMMENTS IN WRITING AND/OR ON THE PLANS WHERE | | | APPLICABLE. MORE INFORMATION ON THE PROPOSED SIGNAGE IS | | | REQUIRED FOR AN ADEQUATE REVIEW: | | | | | | 1.) WHERE ON THE PREMISE IS THE 14 FT. X 4.5 FT. SIGN | | | LOCATED? PLEASE ILLUSTRATE IN THE PROPOSED SIGNAGE | | | PLANS. | | | | | | 2.) THE GOOGLE STREET VIEW OF THE PROPERTY INDICATES | | | THAT THERE IS AN EXISTING CABINET SIGN LOCATED ON THE | | | EAST FACADE; PLEASE VERIFY IF THIS SIGN IS STILL | | | EXISTING ON THE PREMISE. THE PERMIT PLANS SEEM TO | | | INDICATE THAT THIS SIGN HAS BEEN REMOVED. | | | | | | 3.) FACADE DIMENSIONS ARE NEEDED IN ORDER TO CALCULATE | | | THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SIGN AREA. PLEASE | | | PROVIDE/ILLUSTRATE THIS INFORMATION IN THE PLANS. | | | | | | 4.) THE MAXIMUM SUM TOTAL AREA OF ALL SIGNS MOUNTED ON | | | THE FACADE OTHER THAN THE FRONT FACADE: 50 PERCENT OF | | | THE AREA SET FORTH IN SECTION 94-409 IF THERE IS ONLY | | | ONE (1) SIGN PROPOSED FOR THE EAST FACADE. [ZLDR | | | S.94-408(D)(1)(C.)] | | | | | | 5.) THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIGNAGE FOR EACH BUILDING: | | | ONE (1) SIGN FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL BUSINESS OCCUPANT OF | | | THE BUILDING, PLUS TWO (2) ADDITIONAL SIGNS. PLEASE | | | PROVIDE CURRENT IMAGES OF ALL FACADES OF THE BUILDING | | | TO ENSURE THAT THIS REQUIREMENT IS BEING MET. [ZLDR | | | S.94-408(D)(1)(D.)] | | | | | | PLEASE CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF YOU HAVE | | | QUESTIONS. | | | |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |
 |