|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 15080951
| Plan Review Stops For Permit 15080951 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-09-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2015-09-16 |
Time |
13:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2015-09-16 |
Time |
12:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-09-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2015-09-11 |
Time |
14:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2015-09-11 |
Time |
14:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-09-11 14:54:00 | PLAN | | | REVIEW COMMENTS | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW: FBC FIFTH EDITION (2014) | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561) 805-6714 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | DENIED BY BUILDING | | | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: | | | | | | 1) THE SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS FOR | | | ENHANCED FASTENING FROM A LICENSED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | | | THAT WERE SUBMITTED ARE FOR NOA NO.13-1022.15 WHICH IS | | | NOT THE PRODUCT APPROVAL THAT WAS SUBMITTED ( NOA NO. | | | 14-0611.01 ). FBC 107.2.1.3 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-08-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2015-08-26 |
Time |
10:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2015-08-26 |
Time |
09:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-08-26 10:41:50 | PLAN | | | REVIEW COMMENTS | | | | | | 1ST REVIEW: FBC FIFTH EDITION (2014) | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561) 805-6714 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | DENIED BY BUILDING | | | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: | | | | | | 1) SUBMIT 2 SETS OF SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 | | | CALCULATIONS FOR ENHANCED FASTENING FROM A LICENSED | | | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AS REQUIRED BY LIMITATION NUMBER 7 | | | ON PAGE 29 OF THE PRODUCT APPROVAL. ( NOA NO. | | | 14-0611.01 ) FBC 107.2.1.3 | | | | | | 2) IT IS NOT CLEAR FROM THE APPLICATION IF THE TWO NEW | | | SKYLIGHTS ARE REPLACING EXISTING ONES OR ARE NEW | | | INSTALLATIONS. A ROOFING CONTRACTOR CAN REPLACE | | | EXISTING SKYLIGHTS, BUT CAN NOT CUT AND FRAME OPENINGS | | | TO INSTALL NEW ONES. PLEASE CLARIFY. FS 489 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
HIST |
HISTORICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
2015-08-25 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
2015-08-25 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-08-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2015-08-26 |
Time |
10:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2015-08-25 |
Time |
09:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-08-26 09:00:22 | RMCDOUGAL |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |
|
