| Plan Review Stops For Permit 15080781 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-12-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2015-12-15 |
Time |
15:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2015-12-15 |
Time |
15:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-10-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2015-10-07 |
Time |
11:47 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2015-10-06 |
Time |
12:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-10-07 11:54:27 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | 1. DUE TO INCREASED VALUE, THIS PROJECT NOW APPEARS TO | | | BE A SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENT. | | | | | | EITHER PROVIDE AN ELEVATION CERTIFICATE WHICH SHOWS | | | FULL COMPLIANCE WITH NFIP REQUIREMENTS (7.5'), OR | | | PROVIDE AN UPDATED VALUE OF STRUCTURE PRIOR TO | | | CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | THE VALUE GIVEN PREVIOUSLY THROUGH A CERTIFIED | | | APPRAISAL WAS $360,000 (MARKET VALUE). THE VALUE IS TO | | | BE THE VALUE OF THE STRUCTURE ONLY. THE CUMULATIVE | | | LIFETIME IMPROVEMENTS FOR THIS STRUCTURE, INCLUDING THE | | | ADDITION, IS $204,335. | | | | | | PLEASE SEE FEMA SI/SD DESK REFERENCE, PUBLICATION FEMA | | | P-758, PAGE 4-11 FOR OPTIONS FOR DETERMINING MARKET | | | VALUE. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-09-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2015-09-12 |
Time |
17:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2015-09-12 |
Time |
17:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-09-12 17:55:08 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | 1. VALUE PROVIDED FOR THE ADDITIONAL WORK IS $0. THAT | | | IS NOT A REASONABLE VALUATION, FBC 109. | | | | | | 2. PROVIDE A COST BREAKDOWN OF PROJECT, SIGNED AND | | | NOTARIZED BY CONTRACTOR AND OWNER, FBC 109. IT WOULD BE | | | HELPFUL IF ARCHITECT COULD CONFIRM SCOPE IN COST | | | BREAKDOWN. | | | | | | 3. SOME PAGES DO NOT HAVE CHANGES CLOUDED; FOR | | | INSTANCE, SP1, A4. SCOPE OF REVISION NOT CLEAR FBC 107. | | | | | | 4. PRODUCT APPROVALS TO BE REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF | | | RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL, FBC 107. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-08-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
malbarra |
Date |
2015-08-28 |
Time |
10:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-08-28 |
Time |
10:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-10-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2015-10-06 |
Time |
14:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2015-10-01 |
Time |
12:49 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-09-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2015-09-12 |
Time |
17:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2015-08-21 |
Time |
10:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-08-21 10:33:43 | LIBRARY |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-08-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-08-28 |
Time |
10:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-08-28 |
Time |
10:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
NFIP |
NFIP REVIEW ACTIVITY |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-12-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2015-12-15 |
Time |
15:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2015-12-15 |
Time |
15:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-12-15 15:39:12 | 12/15/2015: THE MASTER PERMIT WAS APPLIED FOR ON | | | 5/15/2013 AND ISSUED ON 9/23/2014. | | | | | | THE FIRST APPRAISAL WAS DATED 2/2014. THIS WAS DURING | | | THE BEGINNING OF THE RECOVERY OF THE LOCAL REAL ESTATE | | | MARKET AFTER A HISTORIC RECESSION. AFTER RECEIPT OF THE | | | FIRST APPRAISAL, APPLICANT REDUCED THE SCOPE OF WORK IN | | | ORDER TO REMAIN UNDER THE 50% THRESHOLD AND ARCHITECT | | | REVISED THE PLANS. OBTAINING NEW PLANS AND SUBSEQUENT | | | PLAN REVIEWS TOOK SEVERAL MONTHS. | | | | | | A NEW APPRAISAL WHICH INCLUDES THE HOUSE WITHOUT THE | | | 2ND STORY ADDITION USING SALES BETWEEN 4/2014 AND | | | 7/2014 (AFTER THE FIRST APPRAISAL BUT BEFORE THE PERMIT | | | WAS ISSUED) WAS PROVIDED. THE MARKET AT THE TIME THAT | | | THE FIRST APPRAISAL WAS DONE WAS ARTIFICIALLY LOW DUE | | | TO A MARKET THAT WAS IN THE EARLY STAGE OF RECOVERY. | | | THE SECOND APPRAISAL REFLECTS VALUES AT THAT TIME MORE | | | ACCURATELY. | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
NFIP |
NFIP REVIEW ACTIVITY |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-10-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2015-10-07 |
Time |
11:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2015-10-07 |
Time |
11:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-10-07 11:47:17 | SEE BUILDING REVIEW | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-08-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
sgraham |
Date |
2015-08-28 |
Time |
10:09 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-08-24 11:13:09 | 8/24/15 |
|
|
