| 2015-08-28 11:59:08 | IN THE FUTURE, FOR A QUICKER TURN AROUND TIME, PLEASE |
| | CONSIDER FILING ELECTRONICALLY. IT IS NOT ONLY BETTER |
| | FOR OUR ENVIRONMENT, BUT EASIER TO HANDLE AND STORE THE |
| | DOCUMENTS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THAT I, MIKE ALBARRAN, ELECTRICAL PLANS |
| | EXAMINER HAVE COMPLETED THE REVIEW OF THE ABOVE |
| | MENTIONED JOB. BELOW ARE THE COMMENTS WITH REGARDS TO |
| | THE REQUIRED CORRECTIONS. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHALL BE |
| | CORRECTED AND THE PLANS RESUBMITTED FOR ANOTHER REVIEW. |
| | 1. FBC 107.2.1.4 BLDG. PLANS SHALL BE DRAWN TO A |
| | MINIMUM OF 1/8" SCALE, AND SHALL INCLUDE A DETAILED |
| | SCOPE OF WORK. FURTHER DEFINE YOUR SCOPE ON THE PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION AS WELL. |
| | 2. YOUR DEVICE COUNT ON THE SUBMITTED RISER DIAGRAM |
| | DOES NOT MATCH THE DEVICE COUNT ON THE LEGEND. |
| | 3. THE SUBMITTED RISER DIAGRAM DOES NOT MATCH THE |
| | DEVICE COUNT ON THE FLOOR PLAN |
| | 4. THE DEVICE LEGEND AND CALCULATION BOXES CALL FOR A |
| | DIFFERENT POWER SUPPLY THAN THE PROVIDED CUT SHEET. |
| | 5. PROVIDE A CUT SHEET FOR THE CEILING DEVICES. |
| | 6. THE PLANS SHALL INCLUDE THE RESPECTIVE CODE BY WHICH |
| | THE SYSTEM WAS DESIGNED. (NFPA 70, (NEC) 2011, NFPA 72 |
| | 2012) |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE |
| | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. PLEASE, ADDITIONALLY, INSERT |
| | CORRECTED PAGES INTO TO SUBMITTAL AND LEAVE THE |
| | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE FURTHER QUESTIONS, PLEASE DON?T HESITATE TO |
| | CONTACT ME DIRECTLY. |
| | |
| | |
