Plan Review Details - Permit 15071108
Plan Review Stops For Permit 15071108
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2015-09-17 Cont ID  
Sent By skennedy Date 2015-09-17 Time 14:09 Rev Time 0.00
Received By skennedy Date 2015-09-17 Time 14:09 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2015-08-28 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2015-08-28 Time 07:27 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2015-08-28 Time 07:27 Sent To  
Notes
2015-08-28 07:31:19****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 1. OK
  
 2. SEE FBC 5TH EDITION 3105.3.1.1, FABRIC CANNOT BE
 LESS THAN 6'. A 7'6' HIGH FRAME IS PROPOSED WITH 6'8"
 (FROM GRADE) CLOTH DROP.
  
 EIGHT AWNINGS ARE PROPOSED. SOME APPEAR TO BE IN AREAS
 ACCESSIBLE TO THE PUBLIC. OTHERS APPEAR TO BE OVER
 LANDSCAPED AREAS. UPON REQUEST, THIS PERMIT CAN BE
 ISSUED WITH PROVISO - ALL PORTIONS OF AWNING CLOTH DROP
 ACCESSIBLE TO THE PUBLIC (INCLUDING AT DOORWAYS) SHALL
 NOT BE AT LESS THAN 7'.
  
 FBC 5TH EDITION EXISTING BUILDING SECTION 301.1,
 DESIGNER TO STATE WHICH METHOD OF ALTERATION IS ELECTED
 FOR THIS PROJECT.
  
 IT APPEARS THAT THIS IS A LEVEL I ALTERATION, NEW
 MATERIALS REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR
 NEW CONSTRUCTION.
  
 IF CONTRACTOR CAN PROVIDE A COPY OF THE PERMIT ISSUED
 FOR THE AWNING SHOWING CLOTH DROP AT 6'8" AS PROPOSED,
 I CAN INVESTIGATE WHETHER THE PERMIT WAS ISSUED IN
 COMPLIANCE WITH THE BUILDING CODE IN EFFECT AT THE
 TIME.
  
 FOR A PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST, CONTACT [email protected]
 OR [email protected].
  
  
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-08-03 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2015-08-03 Time 07:35 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2015-08-03 Time 07:35 Sent To  
Notes
2015-08-03 07:57:14****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 1. FBC3501.3.5, PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION TO SHOW THAT THE
 FABRIC MEETS THE REQUIREMENT OF NFPA701. NO TEST REPORT
 OR RESULT WAS PROVIDED.
  
 2. PROVIDE A SITE PLAN SHOWING PROPOSED LOCATION,
 HEIGHT AT LOWEST PORTION OF THE AWNING FABRIC, DISTANCE
 TO PROPERTY LINE, AND IF IT EXTENDS OVER THE PROPERTY
 LINE, INCLUDE THE SIDEWALK WIDTH AND DIMENSION FOR THE
 PORTION OF THE AWNING THAT WILL EXTEND OVER THE PUBLIC
 WAY, FBC 5TH EDITION BUILDING 3202, CITY OF WEST PALM
 BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SECTION
 107.
  
 3. FBC 5TH EDITION EXISTING BUILDING SECTION 301.1,
 DESIGNER TO STATE WHICH METHOD OF ALTERATION IS ELECTED
 FOR THIS PROJECT.
  
 IT APPEARS THAT THIS IS A LEVEL I ALTERATION, NEW
 MATERIALS REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR
 NEW CONSTRUCTION.
  
 NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED TO DETERMINE CODE
 COMPLIANCE.
  
 4. THIS CONTRACTOR WAS UNDER AGREEMENT TO CLOSE OUT 5
 EXPIRED PERMITS PER MONTH. THREE MORE PERMITS HAVE
 EXPIRED (TWO WHICH WERE SUPPOSED TO TAKE CARE OF
 EXPIRED PERMITS). FAILURE TO CLOSE OUT A SUBSTANTIAL
 NUMBER OF PERMITS IMMEDIATELY MAY RESULT IN A COMPLAINT
 FILED AGAINST THIS CONTRACTOR.
  
 MUCH TIME (BOTH BY ME AND BY DIANE FULCHER) WAS SPENT
 WITH JOE MATTEI AND DAWN MATTEI EXPLAINING HOW EXPIRED
 PERMITS ARE RESOLVED. WHEN RESUBMITTING, CONTRACTOR
 SHOULD HAVE A LIST OF EXPIRED PERMITS WHICH HAVE BEEN
 CLOSED. THERE ARE A TOTAL OF 26 REVOKED PERMITS, BUT
 TWO OF THE REPLACEMENT PERMITS HAVE EXPIRED, WHICH
 INDICATES THAT APPROXIMATELY 24 EXPIRED PERMITS HAVE
 BEEN RESOLVED.
  
 CONTRACTOR TODAY HAS A TOTAL OF 77 EXPIRED PERMITS. THE
 INITIAL AGREEMENT WHICH WAS, I BELIEVE, IN SEPTEMBER
 2014 WAS FOR 5 PERMITS A MONTH TO BE RESOLVED. RESOLVED
 = NEW PERMIT ISSUED, INSPECTED, CLOSED. OBTAINING
 PERMITS AND ALLOWING THEM TO EXPIRE IS NOT RESOLUTION
 OF AN EXPIRED PERMIT. NEW PERMITS WHICH WERE OPEN
 DURING THIS TIME PERIOD (9/14 TO PRESENT) HAVE EXPIRED.
  
 IN SEPTEMBER 2014, CONTRACTOR APPLIED FOR A TOTAL OF 9
 REISSUE PERMITS; 8 ARE CLOSED, ONE IS AGAIN IN EXPIRED
 STATUS. THE EIGHT RESOLVED WILL BE CONSIDERED AS
 SEPTEMBER 2014 COMPLIED WITH 5 EXPIRED PERMITS
 RESOLVED; OCTOBER 2014 HAD 2 RESOLVED (THE 2 EXTRA FROM
 SEPTEMBER, NEW EXPIRED DOESN'T COUNT TOWARDS RESOLVED
 PERMITS). CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE A LIST OF THE FIVE
 PERMITS PER MONTH WHICH WERE RESOLVED. IF NONE OTHER
 THAN THE 7 THAT I WAS ABLE TO IMMEDIATELY IDENTIFY WERE
 RESOLVED, PLEASE RESOLVE 48 OF THE 76 EXPIRED PERMITS
 AT THIS TIME (FIVE PER MONTH, OCTOBER THROUGH JULY).
  
 COMMENT #4 WILL NOT PREVENT THIS PERMIT FROM BEING
 ISSUED. HOWEVER, FAILURE TO RESOLVE 48 EXPIRED PERMITS
 (AT A MINIMUM, SUBMIT REISSUE PERMITS) MAY RESULT IN A
 COMPLAINT BEING FILED.
  
  
  
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2015-08-28 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2015-08-28 Time 08:30 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2015-08-20 Time 16:40 Sent To  
Notes
2015-08-25 18:05:108/25 TO SH DESK
  
2015-08-20 16:40:24ROUTED TO ZONING
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2015-08-03 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2015-08-03 Time 08:37 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2015-08-03 Time 08:37 Sent To  
Notes
2015-07-29 09:21:53ROUTED TO ZONING
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2015-08-21 Cont ID  
Sent By sgraham Date 2015-08-21 Time 15:43 Rev Time 0.00
Received By sgraham Date 2015-08-21 Time 15:43 Sent To B
Notes
2015-08-21 15:44:558/21/15 ZONING FAILED
  
 1. SUBMIT TWO UP TO DATE SURVEYS SHOWING THE LOCATION
 OF THE AWNINGS ON THE BUILDINGS.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-07-30 Cont ID  
Sent By sgraham Date 2015-07-30 Time 12:30 Rev Time 0.00
Received By sgraham Date 2015-07-30 Time 12:30 Sent To B
Notes
2015-07-30 12:31:277/30/15 ZONING FAILED
  
 1. SUBMIT 2- UP TO SURVEYS HIGHLIGHTING THE LOCATION OF
 ALL THE AWNING.


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved