Plan Review Details - Permit 15071032
Plan Review Stops For Permit 15071032
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2016-02-09 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2016-02-09 Time 10:25 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2016-02-09 Time 10:15 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2015-11-30 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2015-11-30 Time 18:05 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2015-11-30 Time 18:05 Sent To  
Notes
2015-11-30 18:15:10****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 1. FBC 5TH EDITION 301.1, DESIGNER IS TO ELECT
 COMPLIANCE METHOD. EXISTING BUILDING IS BEING RENOVATED
 (BY AFFECTING THE EXITING AT THE REAR) AND THE PROPOSED
 CONSTRUCTION IS AN ADDITION.
  
 3RD REVIEW, METHOD OF ALTERATION NOT STATED.
  
 2. FBC 5TH EDITION CHAPTER 11, NO INFORMATION PROVIDED
 FOR THIS ADDITION TO AN ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY BUILDING
 REGARDING ANY OF THE ITEMS IN THIS CHAPTER. PROVIDE
 PLANS TO ADDRESS ALL. BASIC INFORMATION SUCH AS
 OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION (FBC CHAPTER 3) NOT PROVIDED.
 NO OCCUPANCY SEPARATION SHOWN, A 6" STEP IS SHOWN BUT
 NO ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE INFORMATION PROVIDED. THE
 PLAN APPEARS TO ROUTE TWO ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY EXITS
 THROUGH A NEW STORAGE ROOM (OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION
 NOT STATED, S1 OR S2?). THERE ARE MANY REFERENCES TO
 THE "NEW BUILDING" BUT TO BE CONSIDERED A SEPARATE
 BUILDING, A FIRE WALL IS REQUIRED, NONE SHOWN.
  
 3RD REVIEW, ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED BUT
 OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION NOT STATED, AND THE
 ELIMINATION OF TWO EXITS NOT ADDRESSED, ACCESSIBILITY
 NOT PROPERLY ADDRESSED. PROVIDE A LIFE SAFETY PLAN
 WHICH SHOWS HOW THE PROPOSED RENOVATION AFFECTS
 EXITING. INCLUDE OCCUPANT LOAD, EXIT LIGHTS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCE, ALL OTHER APPLICABLE INFORMATION, FBC CHAPTER
 10. A STATEMENT IN THE RESPONSE LETTER THAT
 ACCESSIBILITY AND EXITING IS MAINTAINED THROUGH THE
 FRONT IS NOT ADEQUATE.
  
 3. PROPOSED RENOVATION APPEARS TO ELIMINATE TWO EXITS,
 BUT NO LIFE SAFETY PLAN PROVIDED. PROVIDE A LIFE SAFETY
 PLAN TO SHOW HOW ELIMINATION OF TWO DOORS WILL AFFECT
 THE EXITING FOR THIS BUILDING.
  
 3RD REVIEW, NOT ADDRESSED. SEE COMMENT #2. EXITING AND
 ACCESSIBLE EXITING NOT CLEAR.
  
 A SET HAS BEEN RETAINED.
  
 4. CALCULATIONS FOR THE ROOF WERE PROVIDED. PROVIDE THE
 PRODUCT APPROVAL, FAC9N-3.
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2015-09-01 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2015-09-01 Time 15:45 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2015-09-01 Time 15:45 Sent To  
Notes
2015-09-01 16:27:10****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 1. FBC 5TH EDITION 301.1, DESIGNER IS TO ELECT
 COMPLIANCE METHOD. EXISTING BUILDING IS BEING RENOVATED
 (BY AFFECTING THE EXITING AT THE REAR) AND THE PROPOSED
 CONSTRUCTION IS AN ADDITION.
  
 2. FBC 5TH EDITION CHAPTER 11, NO INFORMATION PROVIDED
 FOR THIS ADDITION TO AN ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY BUILDING
 REGARDING ANY OF THE ITEMS IN THIS CHAPTER. PROVIDE
 PLANS TO ADDRESS ALL. BASIC INFORMATION SUCH AS
 OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION (FBC CHAPTER 3) NOT PROVIDED.
 NO OCCUPANCY SEPARATION SHOWN, A 6" STEP IS SHOWN BUT
 NO ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE INFORMATION PROVIDED. THE
 PLAN APPEARS TO ROUTE TWO ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY EXITS
 THROUGH A NEW STORAGE ROOM (OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION
 NOT STATED, S1 OR S2?). THERE ARE MANY REFERENCES TO
 THE "NEW BUILDING" BUT TO BE CONSIDERED A SEPARATE
 BUILDING, A FIRE WALL IS REQUIRED, NONE SHOWN.
  
 3. PROPOSED RENOVATION APPEARS TO ELIMINATE TWO EXITS,
 BUT NO LIFE SAFETY PLAN PROVIDED. PROVIDE A LIFE SAFETY
 PLAN TO SHOW HOW ELIMINATION OF TWO DOORS WILL AFFECT
 THE EXITING FOR THIS BUILDING.
  
 4. THERE IS A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF TEXT ON THIS PLAN.
 REMOVE ALL WHICH DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS SPECIFIC JOB.
 FOR INSTANCE, LEVELS 1, 2, AND 3 ALTERATIONS ARE LSITED
 UNDER "BUILDING CODES." IS ENGINEER STATING THAT THIS
 IS A LEVEL 3 ALTERATION? SHEET S1.2 MAKES REFERENCE TO
 THE RESIDENTIAL CODE; TO WHAT PART OF THE PROJECT IS
 THIS APPLICABLE?
  
 NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED FOR A COMPLETE
 REVIEW. SEE FBC 107:
  
 107.2 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
 SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTIONS
 107.2.1 THROUGH 107.2.5.
 107.2.1 INFORMATION ON CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS.
 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 DIMENSIONED AND DRAWN UPON SUITABLE MATERIAL.
 ELECTRONIC MEDIA DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED WHEN APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL.
 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT
 CLARITY TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE AND EXTENT OF
 THE WORK PROPOSED AND SHOW IN
 DETAIL THAT IT WILL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS
 CODE AND RELEVANT LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES
 AND REGULATIONS, AS DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING
 OFFICIAL. SUCH DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHALL
 CONTAIN INFORMATION, IN THE FORM OF NOTES OR OTHERWISE,
 AS TO THE QUALITY OF MATERIALS, WHERE
 QUALITY IS ESSENTIAL TO CONFORMITY WITH THE TECHNICAL
 CODES. SUCH INFORMATION SHALL BE SPECIFIC,
 AND THE TECHNICAL CODES SHALL NOT BE CITED AS A WHOLE
 OR IN PART, NOR SHALL THE TERM "LEGAL" OR
 ITS EQUIVALENT BE USED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR SPECIFIC
 INFORMATION. ALL INFORMATION, DRAWINGS,
 SPECIFICATIONS AND ACCOMPANYING DATA SHALL BEAR THE
 NAME AND SIGNATURE OF THE PERSON
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN. (SEE ALSO SECTION 107.3.5).
  
 A COMPLETE REVIEW WILL BE PERFORMED WHEN ALL TEXT NOT
 APPLICABLE TO THIS JOB IS REMOVED AND INFORMATION
 REQUIRED TO DETERMINE CODE COMPLIANCE IS PROVIDED.
  
 A SET HAS BEEN RETAINED.
  
  
  
  
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2015-08-04 Cont ID  
Sent By cpuell Date 2015-08-04 Time 08:41 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cpuell Date 2015-08-04 Time 08:41 Sent To  
Notes
2015-08-04 08:42:19NEW SURVEY CAME IN, IN THE MIDDLE OF REVIEW. OK PER
 SHILL
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2016-02-08 Cont ID  
Sent By mvaldes Date 2016-02-08 Time 10:39 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mvaldes Date 2016-02-08 Time 10:39 Sent To B
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2015-11-30 Cont ID  
Sent By mvaldes Date 2015-11-30 Time 11:36 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mvaldes Date 2015-11-30 Time 11:36 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-09-10 Cont ID  
Sent By ppetty Date 2015-09-10 Time 09:09 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ppetty Date 2015-09-10 Time 08:56 Sent To  
Notes
2015-09-10 09:09:41NEED 2 SETS OF PLANS
 LOCATION+SIZE OF SERVICE
 IN SMALL BIN V
 PHIL PETTY
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2016-01-26 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 2016-01-26 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 2016-01-26 Time 13:41 Sent To B
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2015-11-25 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 2015-11-25 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 2015-11-25 Time 13:45 Sent To E
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-09-02 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 2015-09-02 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 2015-09-02 Time 16:34 Sent To E
Notes
2015-09-02 16:55:18THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE
 MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1) ONLY ONE SET OF PLAN DRAWINGS WAS PROVIDED, TWO
 SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR FINAL APPROVAL.
  
 2) THERE APPEARS TO BE TWO DOORS LEADING FROM THE MAIN
 BLDG THAT MAY BE REQUIRED EXIT DOORS. EXIT DOORS CAN
 NOT PASS THRU A STORAGE AREA.
  
 3) PROVIDE A LIFE SAFETY PLAN.
  
 4) TWO CEILING FANS ARE BEING PROVIDED. IF THIS IS A
 STORAGE AREA, WHAT TYPE OF MATERIAL WILL BE STORED
 HERE.
  
 5) NO EXIT SIGN IS PROVIDED AT THE EXTERIOR DOOR.
  
 6) IS THE MAIN BUILDING SPRINKLERED OR CONTAIN A FIRE
 ALARM. ANY LIFE SAFETY SYSTEM SHALL BE EXTENDED INTO
 THE PROPOSED STORAGE AREA.
  
 7) NO EMERGENCY LIGHTING IS INDICATED.
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 5 Status N Date 2016-02-17 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2016-02-17 Time 09:30 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2016-02-17 Time 09:30 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2016-02-09 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2016-02-09 Time 12:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2016-01-25 Time 11:30 Sent To  
Notes
2016-01-26 11:30:38RESUB ROUTED TO FIRE
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2015-11-30 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2015-11-30 Time 18:15 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2015-11-24 Time 16:30 Sent To  
Notes
2015-11-24 16:31:08RESUB ROUTED TO FIRE
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2015-10-19 Cont ID  
Sent By skennedy Date 2015-09-10 Time 08:40 Rev Time 0.00
Received By skennedy Date 2015-08-03 Time 08:42 Sent To Z
Notes
2015-09-01 16:27:459/1 TO FIRE
  
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2015-08-04 Cont ID  
Sent By cpuell Date 2015-08-04 Time 08:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cpuell Date 2015-07-27 Time 14:13 Sent To  
Notes
2015-07-28 14:14:01ZONING BOX
Review Stop IMPACT COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2016-02-17 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2016-02-17 Time 09:29 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2016-02-17 Time 09:29 Sent To  
Notes
2016-02-17 09:30:05MU-2016-003588
 $1382.98 PAID
  
Review Stop IMPACT COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2016-02-09 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2016-02-09 Time 12:39 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2016-02-09 Time 12:39 Sent To  
Notes
2016-02-09 12:40:25****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 1. IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT BY PALM BEACH COUNTY REQUIRED
 PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE. THE PLANS ARE TO BE STAMPED
 AND THE RECEIPT PROVIDED.
  
  
Review Stop R ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2016-02-09 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2016-02-09 Time 12:34 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2016-02-09 Time 10:25 Sent To  
Notes
2016-02-09 12:34:56NOA 14-0611.01 AND CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED
  
Review Stop R ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-09-01 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2015-09-01 Time 16:31 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2015-09-01 Time 16:31 Sent To  
Notes
2015-09-01 16:32:01****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 1. SYSTEM E1 HAS BEEN SELECTED, -45 PSF DP. ENGINEER
 STATES THAT RING SHANK NAILS AND TIN CAPS ARE PROPOSED,
 BUT THE CALCS WERE PERFORMED USING THE FASTENER PATTERN
 FOR THE DRILL TEC FASTENERES.
  
 CLARIFY OR REVISE, FBC 1609.
  
 A SET HAS BEEN RETAINED.
  
  
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2015-08-04 Cont ID  
Sent By skennedy Date 2015-10-19 Time 08:41 Rev Time 0.00
Received By sgraham Date 2015-08-04 Time 11:57 Sent To B
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-07-29 Cont ID  
Sent By sgraham Date 2015-07-29 Time 12:31 Rev Time 0.00
Received By sgraham Date 2015-07-29 Time 12:31 Sent To B
Notes
2015-07-29 12:32:377/29/15 ZONING FAILED
  
 1. SUBMIT TWO UP TO DATE SURVEYS SHOW THE LOCATION OF
 THE NEW STORAGE AREA


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved