| Plan Review Stops For Permit 15071022 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-03-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-03-07 |
Time |
07:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-03-07 |
Time |
07:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-12-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2015-12-17 |
Time |
17:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2015-12-17 |
Time |
17:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-12-17 17:29:51 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ALTERATION, SECOND BUILDING REVIEW | | | CHECKLIST. | | | CODE: FBC-5TH EDITION (2014). | | | | | | NOTE: THE COMMENTS BELOW MAY BE APPROVED WITH PROVISO. | | | REVISION FEES MAY APPLY. CONTRACTOR TO ADVICE IF | | | PROVISO OPTION IS PREFERRED OR IF RE-SUBMITTING | | | REQUIRED INFORMATION BEFORE ISSUING THE PERMIT. | | | | | | | | | 1-PROVIDE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 811 | | | OF FBC-EXISTING BUILDING, 5TH EDITION (2014). | | | NOTE: PLEASE COORDINATE ENERGY CALCULATIONS WITH PLANS | | | SUBMITTED TO AVOID CONFLICTS OR DELAYS. | | | (10/1/15 GOT CONFIRMATION FROM FRIEDERIKE MITTNER. THIS | | | IS A CONTRIBUTING HISTORIC BUILDING. THEREFORE ENERGY | | | CALCULATIONS ARE NOT REQUIRED. | | | CALLED CONTRACTOR PAUL NEWMAN TO NOTIFY HIM ABOUT THE | | | ENERGY CALCULATIONS). | | | | | | RESPONSE: ENERGY CALCULATIONS WERE SUBMITTED ANYWAY. | | | ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED NO TO BE SUBMITTED BECAUSE THE | | | HOUSE A A TRUE CONTRIBUTING HISTORIC HOUSE. IF | | | CONTRACTOR WANTS TO SUBMITTED THEM, THEN THEY NEED TO | | | BE CORRECT. REVISE THE FOLLOWING: | | | A) REVISE ITEM #1. THIS IS EXISTING BUILDING NOT NEW | | | CONSTRUCTION. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 OF FBC-ENERGY | | | CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). | | | | | | B) REVISE ITEM #10. R-VALUE TO MATCH PLANS. SEC. | | | R101.5.1.1.2 OF FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION | | | (2014). | | | | | | C) REVISE THE ROOF TYPE SHOWN ON PAGE 2 OF 4. SEE PLANS | | | AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. THE ROOF TYPE IS NOT HIP. SEC. | | | R101.5.1.1.2 OF FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION | | | (2014). | | | | | | D) CLARIFY WHY THE CEILING R-VALUE ON PAGE 2 OF 4 IS | | | 0.1. SEE ITEM #10 ON COVER PAGE AND ARCHITECTURAL | | | PLANS. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 | | | OF FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). | | | | | | E) DOOR ORIENTATION ON PAGE 3 OF 4 IS INCORRECT. SEE | | | PLANS/SURVEY AND REVIEW AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 | | | OF FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). | | | | | | F) WINDOWS ORIENTATION ON PAGE 3 OF 4 IS INCORRECT. SEE | | | PLANS AND SURVEY AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. | | | R101.5.1.1.2 OF FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION | | | (2014). | | | | | | G) COMPLETE THE AIR BARRIER AND INSULATION INSPECTION | | | SHEET. SEC R405.4.2 OF FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH | | | EDITION (2014) | | | | | | NOTE: LABEL FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS SHOWING THE U-FACTOR | | | AND SHGC FACTOR SPECIFIED ON-THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS | | | WILL BE REQUIRED WHEN ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE NOT USING | | | THE SOFTWARE DEFAULT FACTOR FOR GLAZING. | | | | | | 2- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY | | | FAC 61G20-3.002(33) FOR: | | | A) PROPOSED ROOF SHINGLES AS SPECIFIED ON THE | | | ARCHITECT'S PLANS. | | | | | | RESPONSE: PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS NOT SUBMITTED. | | | | | | B) EXTERIOR SWING DOOR THAT MATCHES DOOR #2 SPECIFIED | | | BY THE ARCHITECT. AND NEED TO PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL | | | FOR THE CURRENT CODE VERSION 2014. FL15210-R4 SUBMITTED | | | IS FOR 2010 CODE VERSION. | | | | | | RESPONSE: PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS NOT SUBMITTED. | | | | | | 3- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO APPROVE ABOVE PRODUCT | | | APPROVALS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY | | | AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | 4- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS TOO | | | LOW. VALUATION TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, | | | CONTRACTOR'S OVERHEAD AND PROFIT AND ALL DESIGN | | | PROFESSIONAL FEES AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 109.3 CITY | | | AMENDMENTS. COORDINATE WITH ITEM #1 ABOVE AND REVISE | | | VALUATION AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | ***PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH | | | COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | (561)805-6712 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-09-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2015-09-22 |
Time |
11:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2015-09-22 |
Time |
07:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-09-22 11:30:05 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ALTERATION, BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS. | | | CODE: FBC-5TH EDITION (2014). | | | | | | 1- SCOPE OF WORK IS NOT CLEAR. THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT | | | SETS OF PLANS WITH TWO DIFFERENT DESIGN PROFESSIONALS | | | (ONE ARCHITECT AND ONE ENGINEER) AND SCOPE OF WORK IS | | | NOT CLEAR. ALSO, THERE IS A PERMIT APPLICATION FOR | | | INTERIOR DEMOLITION FOR WHICH THE SCOPE OF WORK WAS NOT | | | CLEAR EITHER. A PRE-INSPECTION IS REQUESTED AT THIS | | | TIME TO HELP DETERMINE THE ACTUAL SCOPE OF WORK. THEN, | | | PROVIDE ONLY ONE COMPLETE SET OF PLANS THAT DESCRIBES | | | ALL THE SCOPE OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED AND PROVIDE | | | COMPLETE EVALUATION AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 606.2.2.1 OF | | | FBC-EXISTING BUILDING, 5TH EDITION (2014). SEC. 107.2.1 | | | CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | NOTE: ALL STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS SPECIFIED FOR THE | | | WALLS, INCLUDING THE GABLE END WALLS NEED TO BE | | | DESIGNED TO TRANSFER ALL LOADS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. | | | R601.2 OF FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). | | | | | | 2- ARCHITECT'S SET OF PLANS SUBMITTED. (THIS WAS THE | | | SET OF PLANS THAT WAS REVIEWED. IT REFERENCES THE | | | CURRENT CODE IN EFFECT AND LOOKS MORE COMPLETE). | | | A) THE ADDRESS SHOWN ON THE TITLE BLOCK IS INCORRECT. | | | REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | B) THERE IS A CONFLICT WITH THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON | | | THE TYPICAL WALL SECTION AND THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON | | | THE STRUCTURAL WOOD NOTES. WALL SECTION CALLS FOR | | | ICYNENE INSULATION, WHILE STRUCTURAL NOTES CALL FOR 20" | | | X 7" SOFFIT VENTS. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH | | | SEC. R806 OF FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). | | | CLARIFY IF DESIGNING A VENTED OR UNVENTED ATTIC. | | | | | | C) IF USING ICYNENE, THEN PROVIDE CURRENT ICC | | | EVALUATION REPORT SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R316. | | | ICC ESR-3210 REPORT SUBMITTED IS EXPIRED AND IS FOR | | | ANOTHER TYPE OF INSULATION NOT ICYNENE AS SPECIFIED BY | | | THE ARCHITECT. IN ADDITION IT WAS REVIEWED/APPROVED BY | | | ANOTHER ENGINEER WHICH DOESN'T HAVE ANY RESPONSIBILITY | | | IN THIS PROJECT. | | | | | | D) DESIGN PRESSURES FOR OPENINGS: REVISE THE DISTANCE | | | FROM THE CORNERS FOR ZONE 4 AND 5. NOTE "A" ON FIGURE | | | R301.2(7) REQUIRES THE DISTANCE TO BE 4 FEET IN ALL | | | CASES NOT 3 FEET . REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 3- ENGINEER'S SET OF PLANS WAS NOT REVIEWED. IT DIDN'T | | | REFERENCED THE CURRENT CODE IN EFFECT AND IS MISSING A | | | LOT OF INFORMATION THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS ARE | | | PROVIDING. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | 4- PROVIDE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 811 | | | OF FBC-EXISTING BUILDING, 5TH EDITION (2014). | | | NOTE: PLEASE COORDINATE ENERGY CALCULATIONS WITH PLANS | | | SUBMITTED TO AVOID CONFLICTS OR DELAYS. | | | (10/1/15 GOT CONFIRMATION FROM FRIEDERIKE MITTNER. THIS | | | IS A CONTRIBUTING HISTORIC BUILDING. THEREFORE ENERGY | | | CALCULATIONS ARE NOT REQUIRED. | | | CALLED CONTRACTOR PAUL NEWMAN TO NOTIFY HIM ABOUT THE | | | ENERGY CALCULATIONS). | | | | | | 5- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY | | | FAC 61G20-3.002(33) FOR: | | | A) PROPOSED ROOF SHINGLES AS SPECIFIED ON THE | | | ARCHITECT'S PLANS. | | | | | | B) EXTERIOR SWING DOOR THAT MATCHES DOOR #2 SPECIFIED | | | BY THE ARCHITECT. AND NEED TO PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL | | | FOR THE CURRENT CODE VERSION 2014. FL15210-R4 SUBMITTED | | | IS FOR 2010 CODE VERSION. | | | | | | C) SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. INFORMATION SUBMITTED DOESN'T | | | HAVE THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER. PROVIDE | | | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE THAT CORRESPOND TO | | | DRAWINGS SUBMITTED AND MAKE SURE THE PRODUCT APPROVAL | | | IS FOR THE 2014 CODE VERSION. | | | | | | D) ALL SIMPSON STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON | | | PLANS. PROVIDE ONLY THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER | | | PAGE AND PAGE SHOWING THE SPECIFIED CONNECTOR OR DESIGN | | | PROFESSIONAL TO LIST THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL | | | NUMBER NEXT TO THE SPECIFIED CONNECTOR. | | | | | | 6- DESIGN PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD TO APPROVE IN WRITING | | | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL THE PRODUCT APPROVALS AS | | | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | 7- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS TOO | | | LOW. VALUATION TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, | | | CONTRACTOR'S OVERHEAD AND PROFIT AND ALL DESIGN | | | PROFESSIONAL FEES AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 109.3 CITY | | | AMENDMENTS. COORDINATE WITH ITEM #1 ABOVE AND REVISE | | | VALUATION AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | ***PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH | | | COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | (561)805-6712 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-03-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
albarran |
Date |
2016-03-29 |
Time |
09:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
albarran |
Date |
2016-03-29 |
Time |
09:12 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2016-03-29 09:28:07 | OCEAN ELECTRIC BROUGHT IN THE REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION | | | AND PERMIT WAS APPROVED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-03-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
albarran |
Date |
2016-03-23 |
Time |
14:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
albarran |
Date |
2016-03-23 |
Time |
14:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-03-23 15:48:13 | 5TH ELECTRICAL REVIEW NOTES FOR REVISION #:15071022 | | | REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH: 5TH EDITION FBC 2014 & | | | NFPA 70 2011 (NEC) | | | | | | CORRECTIONS REQUIRED: | | | THOUGH I SPOKE WITH MR. KERRY THE GC AND EXPLAINED TO | | | HIM WHAT WAS REQUIRED (I READ VERBATIM THE WORDING OF | | | THE PREVIOUS REVIEW (#4 SINCE THERE HAVE BEEN MANY | | | DIFFERENT OPTIONS BROUGHT TO THE TABLE FOR | | | DISCUSSION/APPROVAL, I DO NOT KNOW WHICH IS THE ONE | | | ACCEPTED. THEREFORE I ASKED FOR A SITE SPECIFIC DRAWING | | | OF WHAT IS THERE NOW AS WELL AS AN INDICATION OF WHAT | | | IS TO BE THE PROPOSED FINISHED PRODUCT. THESE DRAWINGS | | | ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL AND ISSUANCE OF | | | ELECTRICAL PERMIT. )) WE AGREED ON WHAT WAS TO BE DONE. | | | YESTERDAY SOMEONE CAME TO THE OFFICE TO SUBMIT A SINGLE | | | RISER DIAGRAM THAT INCLUDES ONLY PART OF THE SERVICE | | | WITH NO SITE PLAN OR SCOPE OF WORK. LOAD CALCS ARE | | | REQUIRED AS WELL. PER WPB CITY AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC | | | THE SCOPE OF WORK ALONG WITH THE NAME AND SIGNATURE OF | | | THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DRAWING SHALL APPEAR ON | | | THE PLANS WITH THE ADDRESS. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING, FOR A QUICKER RETURN ON YOUR | | | RE-SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER | | | (NARRATIVE) ADDRESSING EACH ITEM AND THE PAGE NUMBER | | | WHERE THE CORRECTIONS APPEAR ALONG WITH THE STANDARD | | | CITY RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE INSERT | | | CORRECTED PAGES INTO THE SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. MARK VOID | | | AND LEAVE THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS FOR | | | COMPARATIVE REVIEW. CLOUDING THE CHANGES WILL BE | | | GREATLY APPRECIATED. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE FURTHER QUESTIONS, PLEASE DON?T HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT ME DIRECTLY. | | | | | | THANK YOU, | | | MIKE ALBARRAN | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | PH: 561-805-6746 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-03-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-03-21 |
Time |
14:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
albarran |
Date |
2016-03-21 |
Time |
13:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-03-21 14:19:34 | TODAY I SPOKE W/KERRY THE NEW GC ON THE JOB TO DISCUSS | | | HOW TO PROCEED. SINCE THERE HAVE BEEN MANY DIFFERENT | | | OPTIONS BROUGHT TO THE TABLE FOR DISCUSSION, I DO NOT | | | KNOW WHICH IS THE ONE ACCEPTED. THEREFORE I ASKED FOR A | | | SITE SPECIFIC DRAWING OF WHAT IS THERE NOW AS WELL AS | | | AN INDICATION OF WHAT IS TO BE THE PROPOSED FINISHED | | | PRODUCT. THESE DRAWINGS ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR | | | APPROVAL AND ISSUANCE OF ELECTRICAL PERMIT. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-01-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
albarran |
Date |
2016-01-14 |
Time |
16:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
albarran |
Date |
2016-01-14 |
Time |
15:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-01-14 15:38:05 | YOUR RESUBMITTAL ADDRESSING THE PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED | | | DEFICIENCIES HAS ONCE AGAIN FAILED THE ELECTRICAL | | | REVIEW AS INDICATED BELOW. NEW COMMENTS IF ANY PROMPTED | | | BY ANOTHER REVIEW, MOST LIKELY DUE TO YOUR FAILURE TO | | | SUBMIT A RESPONSE LETTER (NARRATIVE) ADDRESSING THE | | | REQUIRED CORRECTIONS WILL BE NUMBERED IN CONTINUATION | | | OF ANY PREVIOUS COMMENTS. | | | | | | 1. YOU SHALL PROVIDE A SITE PLAN INDICATING THE | | | LOCATION OF THE MAIN SERVICE TO THE RESIDENCE. THOUGH | | | ZONING HAS PERMITTED THE SECOND METER, BOTH FPL & THE | | | NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE RESTRICT THE DROPS TO ONE PER | | | LOT. IT IS NOT MY INTENT TO DESIGN YOUR SERVICE, BUT I | | | CAN RECOMMEND THAT YOU MODIFY THE EXISTING SERVICE AND | | | ADD A TWO GANG METER SOCKET WITH A MAIN FOR THE COTTAGE | | | AND PROCEED FROM THERE TO THE REAR PANEL. PLEASE MAKE | | | CERTAIN TO INCLUDE A PROPER GROUND FOR THE DETACHED | | | STRUCTURE. | | | 2. A LAUNDRY CIRCUIT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED FOR THE | | | COTTAGE UNLESS IT IS TO BE A SEPARATE DWELLING. | | | THEREFORE, IF METERED SEPARATELY, A LAUNDRY CIRCUIT | | | SHALL BE PROVIDED. | | | 3. PER FBC-R 303.9, YOU SHALL PROVIDE HEAT CAPABLE OF | | | MAINTAINING 68 DEGREES F, THREE FT. ABOVE THE FLOOR | | | ETC. REVISE YOUR HVAC AND LOAD CALCS ACCORDINGLY. | | | 5. CORRECT YOUR LOAD CALCS TO INCLUDE THE REQUIRED HEAT | | | AND LAUNDRY CIRCUIT IF APPLICABLE. FIGURE THE LOADS AS | | | PER NEC 220.83. | | | | | | THE REST CAN BE ADDRESSED WITH NOTES ON THE PLANS. | | | 4. NEC 406.12 REQUIRES THAT ALL 15 & 20 AMP NON?LOCKING | | | RECEPTACLES IN DWELLING UNITS BE TAMPER?RESISTANT. | | | 6. NEC 314.27(A)(2), CEILING OUTLET BOXES SHALL BE | | | LISTED TO SUPPORT A MINIMUM OF 50LBS. | | | 7. NEC 314.27(C) REQUIRES THAT CEILING BOXES USED TO | | | SUPPORT CEILING FANS BE LISTED AND MARKED FOR THE | | | PURPOSE. | | | 8. NEC 406.12 REQUIRES THAT 15 & 20 AMP RECEPTACLES IN | | | WET LOCATIONS (OUTDOORS) BE LISTED WEATHER RESISTANT, | | | "WR". | | | 9. FBC-R SECTION 314 REQUIRES THAT YOU INSTALL SMOKE | | | DETECTORS. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY | | | RE?SUBMITTAL FORM. PLEASE, ADDITIONALLY, INSERT | | | CORRECTED PAGES INTO TO SUBMITTAL AND LEAVE THE | | | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS. | | | IF YOU HAVE FURTHER QUESTIONS, PLEASE DON?T HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT ME DIRECTLY. | | | | | | THANK YOU | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-12-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
albarran |
Date |
2015-12-28 |
Time |
14:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
albarran |
Date |
2015-12-28 |
Time |
13:49 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2015-12-28 14:52:41 | YOUR RESUBMITTAL ADDRESSING THE PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED | | | DEFICIENCIES HAS ONCE AGAIN FAILED THE ELECTRICAL | | | REVIEW AS INDICATED BELOW. NEW COMMENTS IF ANY PROMPTED | | | BY ANOTHER REVIEW, MOST LIKELY DUE TO YOUR FAILURE TO | | | SUBMIT A RESPONSE LETTER (NARRATIVE) ADDRESSING THE | | | REQUIRED CORRECTIONS WILL BE NUMBERED IN CONTINUATION | | | OF ANY PREVIOUS COMMENTS. | | | | | | THE PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE | | | EDITION OF THE NEC, (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE) AND THE | | | FBC, (FLORIDA BUILDING CODE) AS WELL AS THE CITY OF | | | WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF | | | SUBMITTAL. | | | 0- YOU FAILED TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING | | | THE ELECTRICAL DEFICIENCIES. | | | 1- YOU SHALL PROVIDE THE REQUESTED SITE PLAN MARKED | | | WITH THE LOCATION OF THE ELECTRICAL SERVICE DROP, THE | | | EXISTING SERVICE EQUIPMENT AND ANY PROPOSED NEW WORK TO | | | THE SERVICE AND/OR EQUIPMENT. INCLUDE ALL SERVICE | | | DISCONNECTS AS WELL. THIS IS TO ASCERTAIN COMPLIANCE | | | WITH NEC 230.2 | | | 2- NOT REQUIRED FOR THE COTTAGE. | | | 3? 5 SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. | | | 6? 9 YOU FAILED TO ADDRESS THE NOTED DEFICIENCIES. | | | CORRECT THE PLANS ACCORDINGLY | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING, FOR A QUICKER RETURN ON YOUR | | | RE-SUBMITTAL, YOU ARE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER (NARRATIVE) ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE | | | STANDARD CITY RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE | | | INSERT CORRECTED PAGES INTO THE SUBMITTAL AND LEAVE THE | | | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS FOR COMPARISON. | | | CLOUDING THE CHANGES WILL BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE FURTHER QUESTIONS, PLEASE DON?T HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT ME DIRECTLY. | | | | | | THANK YOU, | | | MIKE ALBARRAN | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | PH: 561-805-6746 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-09-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
albarran |
Date |
2015-09-16 |
Time |
16:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
albarran |
Date |
2015-09-16 |
Time |
14:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-09-16 16:13:04 | PLEASE NOTE THAT I, MIKE ALBARRAN, ELECTRICAL PLANS | | | EXAMINER HAVE COMPLETED THE REVIEW OF THE ABOVE | | | MENTIONED JOB. BELOW ARE THE COMMENTS WITH REGARDS TO | | | THE REQUIRED CORRECTIONS. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHALL BE | | | CORRECTED AND THE PLANS RESUBMITTED FOR ANOTHER REVIEW. | | | | | | 1. YOU SHALL PROVIDE A SITE PLAN INDICATING THE | | | LOCATION OF THE MAIN SERVICE TO THE RESIDENCE. THOUGH | | | ZONING HAS PERMITTED THE SECOND METER, NEC 230.2 ONLY | | | PERMITS A SINGLE SERVICE PER STRUCTURE, AND FPL WILL | | | GENERALLY ONLY HAVE A SINGLE DROP PER PROPERTY. | | | 2. WHETHER YOU USE IT OR NOT, NEC 210.11(C) & 210.52(F) | | | REQUIRE THAT YOU HAVE A DEDICATED LAUNDRY CIRCUIT. | | | PROVIDE ONE ACCORDINGLY. | | | 3. PER FBC-R 303.9, YOU SHALL PROVIDE HEAT CAPABLE OF | | | MAINTAINING 68?F THREE FT. ABOVE THE FLOOR ETC. REVISE | | | YOUR HVAC AND LOAD CALCS ACCORDINGLY. | | | 4. NEC 406.12, REQUIRES THAT ALL 15 & 20 AMP | | | NON-LOCKING RECEPTACLES IN DWELLING UNITS BE | | | TAMPER-RESISTANT. | | | 5. CORRECT YOUR LOAD CALCS TO MATCH PANEL SCHEDULE. | | | FIGURE THE LOADS AS PER NEC 220.83. | | | 6. NEC 314.27(A)(2), CEILING OUTLET BOXES SHALL BE | | | LISTED TO SUPPORT A MINIMUM OF 50LBS. | | | 7. NEC 314.27(C), REQUIRES THAT CEILING BOXES USED TO | | | SUPPORT CEILING FANS BE LISTED AND MARKED FOR THE | | | PURPOSE. | | | 8. NEC 406.12, REQUIRES THAT 15 & 20 AMP RECEPTACLES IN | | | WET LOCATIONS (OUTDOORS) BE LISTED WEATHER RESISTANT, | | | ?WR?. | | | 9. FBC-R SECTION 314, REQUIRES THAT YOU INSTALL SMOKE | | | DETECTORS. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY | | | RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. PLEASE, ADDITIONALLY, INSERT | | | CORRECTED PAGES INTO TO SUBMITTAL AND LEAVE THE | | | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE FURTHER QUESTIONS, PLEASE DON?T HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT ME DIRECTLY. | | | | | | THANK YOU | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
HIST |
HISTORICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-12-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
fmittner |
Date |
2015-12-11 |
Time |
15:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
fmittner |
Date |
2015-12-11 |
Time |
15:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
HIST |
HISTORICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-08-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
fmittner |
Date |
2015-08-21 |
Time |
16:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
fmittner |
Date |
2015-08-21 |
Time |
16:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-03-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
albarran |
Date |
2016-03-29 |
Time |
09:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
albarran |
Date |
2016-03-22 |
Time |
11:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-03-29 09:29:27 | 3/29/16 PASSED ELECTRICAL REVIEW AS NOTED. OCEAN | | | ELECTRIC WAITED FOR PERMIT. SENT FILE TO SP. MA | | 2016-03-22 11:18:12 | RESUB ROUTED TO MALBARRAN |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-03-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2016-03-22 |
Time |
11:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2016-02-08 |
Time |
14:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-02-08 14:38:02 | RESUB ROUTED TO MALBARRAN |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-01-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-12-28 |
Time |
15:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-12-02 |
Time |
10:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-09-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2015-09-22 |
Time |
13:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2015-07-27 |
Time |
14:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-03-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-03-07 |
Time |
09:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-03-07 |
Time |
09:40 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-12-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2015-12-21 |
Time |
12:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2015-12-21 |
Time |
12:55 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2015-12-21 13:05:56 | | | | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ALTERATION, SECOND MECHANICAL REVIEW | | | CHECKLIST. | | | CODE: FBC-5TH EDITION (2014). | | | | | | NOTE: THE COMMENTS BELOW MAY BE APPROVED WITH PROVISO. | | | REVISION FEES MAY APPLY. CONTRACTOR TO ADVICE IF | | | PROVISO OPTION IS PREFERRED OR IF RE-SUBMITTING | | | REQUIRED INFORMATION BEFORE ISSUING THE PERMIT. | | | | | | 1- REVISE THE EQUIPMENT SIZING CALCULATIONS. | | | A) WINDOW ORIENTATION IS INCORRECT. SEE PLANS AND | | | SURVEY AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE | | | DONE FOR THE ACTUAL ORIENTATION OF THE BUILDING AS | | | REQUIRED BY SEC. R403.6.1 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH | | | EDITION (2014). | | | | | | B) CENTRAL UNIT SPECIFIED ON PAGE 3 IS OVERSIZED. THIS | | | IS NOT ALLOWED BY SEC. R403.6.1.1 FBC-ENERGY | | | CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). | | | | | | 2- PROVIDE A/C PLAN WITH THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: | | | A) NAME AND SIGNATURE OF THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE | | | DESIGN. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | B) EQUIPMENT LOCATION, MANUFACTURER AND MODEL NUMBER. | | | SEC. 107.3.5.3(10) CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | NOTE: EQUIPMENT TO MATCH EQUIPMENT SIZING CALCULATIONS | | | AND ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED. | | | | | | ***PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSIGN EACH | | | COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | (561)805-6712 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-09-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2015-09-22 |
Time |
13:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2015-09-22 |
Time |
13:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-09-22 13:44:15 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ALTERATION, MECHANICAL REVIEW | | | COMMENTS. | | | CODE: FBC-5TH EDITION (2014). | | | | | | 1- PROVIDE HEATING AND COOLING EQUIPMENT SIZING | | | CALCULATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH ALL THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. R403.6.1 OF FBC-ENERGY | | | CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | (561)805-6712 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-12-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-12-08 |
Time |
06:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-12-08 |
Time |
05:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-09-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-08-03 |
Time |
06:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-08-03 |
Time |
06:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-09-17 06:56:29 | THERE IS A SET OF PLANS IN THE SUBMITTAL PACKAGE FOR | | | 1409 GEORGIA AVENUE AND ANOTHER SET OF PLANS WITH AN | | | ADDRESS OF 1401 GEORGIA AVENUE. CLARIFY. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-12-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
fmittner |
Date |
2015-12-11 |
Time |
15:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
fmittner |
Date |
2015-12-11 |
Time |
15:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-08-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
fmittner |
Date |
2015-08-21 |
Time |
16:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
fmittner |
Date |
2015-08-21 |
Time |
16:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|