| 2015-09-01 08:40:45 | 2ND REVIEW: FBC 2014 5TH ED. |
| | |
| | COMMENTS FROM 1ST REVIEW: |
| | 1) REVISE THE CODE REFERENCE CITED ON SHEET FP AS IT IS |
| | INCORRECT. THE APPLICABLE CODE IS THE FBC 5TH EDITION |
| | EXISTING BUILDING VOLUME. |
| | COMPLIED |
| | |
| | 2) PLEASE NOTE THE WINDOWS HAVE BEEN PERMITTED UNDER |
| | SEPARATE PERMIT. NO ADDITIONAL REVIEW FOR WINDOWS WILL |
| | BE CONDUCTED. |
| | N/A |
| | |
| | 3) PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION OR MANUFACTURER?S |
| | INFORMATION ON THE CAST STONE FIREPLACE. WILL IT BE |
| | INCORPORATED INTO THE CHIMNEY TO REMAIN? IF SO, PROVIDE |
| | DETAIL REVIEWED BY THE ARCHITECT CONSISTENT WITH THE |
| | MANUFACTURER?S INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS. |
| | COMPLIED, PLANS NOTED AS DECORATIVE ONLY, FAUX, NON |
| | WORKING FIRE PLACE |
| | |
| | 4) AS FOR THE CHIMNEY, NOTES ARE PROVIDED IN THE |
| | CHIMNEY SUPPORT DETAIL AS FOLLOWS: #6 DOWELS @ 4" O.C.; |
| | 4" X6"X .25 "X 3.5' L; I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT THIS IS |
| | AND IF IT IS INTENDED TO SUPPORT THE CHIMNEY OR IF IT |
| | IS AN ELEVATED SLAB W/ UNEQUAL ANGLES CHIMNEY? IF STEEL |
| | ANGLES, IS THERE A WELD? |
| | PROVISIONALLY APPROVED. THE ARCHITECT HAS PROVIDED A |
| | CERTIFICATION FOR THIS WORK AS COMPLETED AND CHANGED |
| | THE DETAIL, HOWEVER, THE WORK DEPICTED ON THE PLAN IS |
| | UNCLEAR AND WILL BE SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE FIELD |
| | INSPECTOR. |
| | |
| | 5) PROVIDE DETAIL, PERHAPS BY THE STEEL FABRICATOR, AND |
| | REVIEWED BY THE ARCHITECT AS TO ALL STEEL CONNECTIONS |
| | SUCH AS COLUMN TO FLOOR, COLUMN TO BEAM, BEAM TO BEAM, |
| | & BEAM TO CONCRETE BEAM/BEARING PLATES. |
| | PROVISIONALLY APPROVED. THE ARCHITECT HAS PROVIDED A |
| | CERTIFICATION FOR THIS WORK AS COMPLETED HOWEVER, SOME |
| | CONNECTION DETAILS ARE STILL MISSING, AND WILL BE |
| | SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE FIELD INSPECTOR. |
| | |
| | 6) THERE IS A SINGLE 2X4 TOP PLATE OVER A STEEL BEAM TO |
| | BE CONNECTED BY STAGGERED THROUGH BOLTS. WILL THIS |
| | ALLOW FOR 5/8" EDGE DISTANCE CONSISTENT WITH FBCR602 ? |
| | PROVIDE A DETAIL. |
| | PROVISIONALLY APPROVED, SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE |
| | FIELD INSPECTOR. |
| | . |
| | 7) THE SINGLE TOP PLATE IS PROPOSED TO BE CONNECTED TO |
| | EXISTING ROOF FRAMING MEMBERS WITH A SIMPSON H10. THIS |
| | CONNECTOR IS DESIGNED FOR CONNECTION TO A DOUBLE, NOT A |
| | SINGLE TOP PLATE. PROVIDE AN ALTERNATE CONNECTOR. |
| | COMPLIED |
| | |
| | 8) PROVIDE AN ATTACHMENT SCHEDULE FOR THE DENS GLASS TO |
| | THE WOOD FRAMING. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL FRAMING DETAILS |
| | FOR STUDS TO TOP & BOTTOM PLATES AND SPECIFY |
| | CONNECTORS. PROVIDE THE THICKNESS OF STUCCO. |
| | COMPLIED |
| | |
| | AN ENERGY SUBMITTAL MAY BE REQUIRED UNLESS THE |
| | STRUCTURE IS EXEMPT PER FBCE 101.4.2, HISTORIC |
| | BUILDINGS |
| | HISTORIC, EXEMPT. |
| | |
| | STEVEN KENNEDY, CBO |
| | CHIEF PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6710 |
| | [email protected] |
| | 1ST REVIEW: FBC 2014 5TH ED. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
