| 2015-07-22 16:30:39 | 7/22/2015 |
| | PROJECT: LOFTIN PLACE SITE LIGHTING |
| | PERMIT#: 15070211 |
| | CODE: 2011 EDITION OF THE NEC, 5TH EDITION OF THE FBC, |
| | 2010 WPB AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC, CHAPTER ONE, |
| | ADMINISTRATION, 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS. |
| | 1ST ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | REVISE YOUR PLANS IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1) PAGE E-3 CLARIFY A DESIGN CONFLICT OF EXISTING |
| | ELECTRICAL SERVICE POINT B (OLIVE) THE TOP DESIGN OF |
| | THE RACK INDICATES A 300AMP MB WITH THREE CONTCTORS. |
| | THE DESIGN AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE INDICATES A 200AMP |
| | FUSED DISCONNECT. AND THE PANEL SCHEDULE FOR PANEL B |
| | INDICATES A 200AMP MLO. |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY WHICH DESIGN IS ACURATE? 300AMP? OR |
| | 200AMP? MAIN BREAKER OR MAIL LUG ONLY?LASTLY IS THERE |
| | ONE CONTACTOR CONTROLING THE WHOLE PANEL OR ARE THERE |
| | THREE CONTACTORS CONTROLLING THE BRANCH CIRCUITS? |
| | |
| | 2) PROVIDE LEGIBLE LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE AND LOAD |
| | CALCULATION SUMMARY. |
| | |
| | 3) INDICATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE FBC-ENERGY 505.2 |
| | |
| | 4) PROVIDE WIND LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR ALL LIGHT POLES |
| | INCLUDING LUMINAIRE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE FBC 1609 |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE |
| | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. SEE LINK: |
| | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEVELOPMENT/WP-CONTENT/UPLOADS/SITES/33/ |
| | 2013/09/APPLICATION_RESUBMITTAL_FORM_04132010.PDF |
| | |
| | A THOROUGH REVIEW CANNOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME, AS A |
| | RESULT OF THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY APPEAR THAT WERE NOT PART OF |
| | THIS REVIEW. |
| | ADDITIONALLY, IT IS REQUIRED TO INSERT THE CORRECTED |
| | PAGES INTO THE DENIED SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. VOID THE |
| | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS AND LEAVE FOR COMPARATIVE |
| | REVIEW. |
| | DAVID HAYES, ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER, PX3421, |
| | 561-805-6717 OR [email protected] |
| | |
