| 2015-07-08 08:27:24 | 7/8/2015 |
| | PROJECT: FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH |
| | PERMIT#: 15020847 |
| | CODE: 2011EDITION OF THE NEC, FIFTH EDITION OF THE FBC |
| | , WPB AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, |
| | FBC SUPPLEMENTS. |
| | 1ST ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW REVISION #15070084 |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | REVISE YOUR PLANS IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1) THERE ARE TWO RISER DIAGRAMS. NEITHER ONE IS CODE |
| | COMPLIANT. MAKE SOME DELINEATION BETWEEN THE TWO IF |
| | NECESSARY TO KEEP BOTH. IF ONE IS FOR REFERENCE PURPOSE |
| | TO SHOW EXISTING AND ONE IS NEW THEN IDENTIFY THEM AS |
| | SUCH SO IT IS CLEAR WHICH IS WHICH AND THE PURPOSE THEY |
| | SERVE. |
| | |
| | 2) INDICATE ALL CONDUIT, WIRE, AND OCPD AND GROUNDING |
| | SIZES AND TYPES. THERE ARE NO SIZES INDICATED FOR |
| | CONDUITS, FEEDERS, GROUNDING ELECTRODE SYSTEM ETC... |
| | THE WIRE SIZES THAT ARE SHOWN ARE NOT APPROVED FOR THE |
| | OCPD INDICATED THAT THEY ARE CONNECTED TO. |
| | |
| | 3) PROVIDE A LOAD CALCULATION FOR THE ELECTRICAL PANELS |
| | AND SERVICE PROPOSED TO FEED THE LIGHT POLES. NEC 215.5 |
| | |
| | 4) VERIFY THE ELECTRICAL SERVICE DISCONNECTING MEANS |
| | HAS A FAULT CURRENT RATING THAT IS SUFFICIENT AT |
| | NOMINAL CIRCUIT VOLTAGE FOR THE CURRENT THAT MUST BE |
| | INTERRUPTED. NEC 110.9 |
| | |
| | 5) PROVIDE SAFETY LABELING FOR ARC FLASH PROTECTION FOR |
| | THE PANEL BOARDS AND MAIN DISCONNECTING MEANS. NEC |
| | 110.16. |
| | |
| | 6) PROVIDE MANUFACTURER PRODUCT INFORMATION |
| | DOCUMENTATION FOR THE LIGHT FIXTURES PROPOSED |
| | INDICATING OPERATING VOLTAGE AND LOAD AND COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH NEC 110.3 |
| | |
| | 7) THE LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE INDICATES THE SITE |
| | LIGHTING FIXTURES ARE DESIGNED TO OPERATE AT 120VOLTS. |
| | HOWEVER THE SITE CIRCUITING PLAN AND PANEL SCHEDULE |
| | INDICATE THE USE OF 2POLE BREAKERS OPERATING AT 208VOLT |
| | TO FEED THE LIGHT FIXTURES DESIGNED TO OPERATE AT |
| | 120VOLT. NEC 210.4(C) |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE |
| | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. SEE LINK: |
| | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEVELOPMENT/WP-CONTENT/UPLOADS/SITES/33/ |
| | 2013/09/APPLICATION_RESUBMITTAL_FORM_04132010.PDF |
| | |
| | A THOROUGH REVIEW CANNOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME, AS A |
| | RESULT OF THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY APPEAR THAT WERE NOT PART OF |
| | THIS REVIEW. |
| | ADDITIONALLY, IT IS REQUIRED TO INSERT THE CORRECTED |
| | PAGES INTO THE DENIED SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. VOID THE |
| | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS AND LEAVE FOR COMPARATIVE |
| | REVIEW. |
| | DAVID HAYES, ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER, PX3421, |
| | 561-805-6717 OR [email protected] |
| | |
